MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL CARTER FROM H. KNOCHE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R000300040001-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
13
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 20, 2006
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 25, 1964
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R000300040001-6.pdf564.01 KB
Body: 
~r ~ !Sl~~ ,GIB'. o 25 April 1964 1. On the matter of DD/I-DD/S&T "coordination" of finished intelligence, the following is pertinent. After your "peace treaty" directive of 30 October (Tab A) DD/I and DD/S&T each found diffi- culty in translating this into a specific working arrangement. Among other things, DD/I was not able to designate a senior officer to ride herd on coordination until after was given the green light to assume his current position. 2. It was not until 1 March when ORR and OSI worked out an agreement on coordination that specific arrangements were laid on. This ORR-OSI agreement is at Tab B. 3. Prior to the 24 March ORR -OSI agreement, there was very little coordination in the true sense of the word. OSI did seek com- ments from various components of the DD/I but did not feel constrained to incorporate all the comments. These comments were usually sought in an early stage of the preparation of the report and:;the DD/I compo- nents did not know until after the report had appeared on the streets whether or not all of their comments were included. 4. In most cases the damage was not great because frankly most of the reports were not that important. 5. In the case of the nuclear warhead report which triggered DCI's concern and his memo to you of 20 April, ORR did not agree with the paper and said so in written commentary to OSI. ORR objected primarily on grounds that OSI's draft did not take cognizance of Soviet military doctrine. OSI took the view that they need not have included this objection because the paper was primarily scientific and technical. 6. Now that) is in the saddle in DD/I and with the 24 March agreement, the coordination procedures should improve, but there are several issues that are in need of resolution. These issues are: [510R'IIC::C'F Pav:es 4-a Approved For ReleasJ200&09~20. - 80B01676R00030~04k-01- 4 Approved For Release 2006/091 ,q IA-R DP80B01676R000300040001-6 DCI's memo to you of 20 April are attached as Tab C. a. Your directive of 30 October insists that there be coordination but does not specify what should occur when OSI and DD/I components cannot agree. It is my opinion that such cases should be bucked up the line to DD/I and DD/S&T and then onward to you or DCI if necessary. b. Your requirement that the reports be coordinated does not leave room for the publication of a report which may be at odds with NIE's or agreed views, but which would have the value of raising a controversial subject or an interesting hypothesis in order to generate fresh thinking in the community. In my opinion this could be solved by letting OSI or DD/I components publish such a report with a foreword or caveat which clearly specifies that the views are heretic and represent a sort of think-piece. c. There is a nebulous area in the dissemination of OSI reports. They go to members of USIB but it is difficult to say whether they go beyond, for example to people like Bundy; SecDef; Chairman, AEC; etc. This is too important a matter to be left to registries and bookkeepers and I think DD/I should have a voice in determining the dissemination of the OSI reports. d. The fact that no one showed up to explain to you that there was a difficulty in implementing your directive of 30 October and that the issue was not really set right until late March, suggests that you or Executive Director should have a meeting with DD/I, DD/S&T, Office heads in DD/I and OSI to assure yourself that things are now on the track. 7. The nuclear warhead report that raised the issue and the _~- pD ~ S~ Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80B01676R000300040001-6 IERacutiv3 Tj^vi; 30 October 1963 MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director Deputy Director (Intelligence) Deputy Director (Plans) Deputy Director (Science and Technology) Deputy Director (Support) SUBJECT : Relationships Between DD/I and DD/S&T The recent transfer of OSI to the Directorate of Science and Technology necessitates a statement of respective responsibilities of the DD/I and DD/S&T in certain areas. The following guidelines apply: 1. It is essential that this organizational change enhance the free flow of basic intelligence information and exchange of substantive views between the DD/I and DD/S&T at all levels. Well-established working relationships exist and will be encouraged to ensure that all appropriate substantive information and viewpoints are available and considered in connection with the production of finished intelligence of all types. 2. Over-all responsibility for production and publication of finished intelligence, and its dissemination outside of CIA, remains assigned to the DD/I. 3. The DD/S&T carries the basic responsibility for the production and publication of scientific and technical intelligence. Dissemination outside of CIA will have prior DD/I coordination. 4. The DD/I carries the basic responsibility for the integration of scientific and technical intelligence produced by DD/S&T with other types of intelligence in the development of finished intelligence. 5. The DD/I will coordinate all finished intelligence which incorporates scientific and technical material with the DD/S&T prior CIA, using existing channels for this coordina- Xf~ Goa- A3 Rai-1 ,,M77 ~~ 5 T " Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-R DP80B016~-6~000300040~N1-6 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 ? 6. Scientific and technical intelligence material will be routinely provided to the DD/I who will thus have an opportunity to fuse it with other types of intelligence in more broadly based CIA publications. This advance coordination will also ensure that the substantive views of all relevant DD/I analytical components will continue to be available to the Office of Scientific Intelligence. The DD/I will designate a senior officer to ensure that these comments are provided promptly to OSI so that an efficient production effort can be sustained. This provision for review of S&T intelligence will also encourage the normal and extensive exchange of draft reports between analysts. 7. Production of S&T intelligence reports, especially as they support National Intelligence Estimates and Current Intelligence or other CIA memoranda, will be scheduled so as to be responsive to DD/I needs. 8. OSI will continue to prepare draft contributions to pertinent National Intelligence Estimates, and will provide them to ONE and other interested offices of the DD/I. The same draft contributions will also be provided to the relevant USIB committees, where such drafts often form the basis for community agreement which is subsequently provided by the committees to ONE. These draft contributions will be clearly identified as DD/S&T working papers, so as not to be confused with final Agency positions. 9. It is essential that OCI and ONE continue to receive vigorous and effective support from the DD/S&T on current and national intelligence matters. The AD/SI will designate a senior officer to ensure that this support is rendered to OCI, ONE, and other elements of the DD/I. 10. The DD/S&T will act as the immediate link between the DCI and the USIB scientific committees, GMAIC, JAEIC, and SIC, while recognizing that these committees are elements of USIB and are not subordinate to either DD/I or DD/S&T. The DD/S&T will take the initiative in preparing briefing memoranda and position papers for the DCI on matters arising out of those committees, and will coordinate such matters with the DD/I. 11. The DD/I is responsible for establishing the CIA position on all USIB matters. He will rely heavily on the DD/S&T in framing the Agency position on matters which are primarily scientific and technical and will Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 ? 0 ensure that unresolved substantive differences between DD/S&T and Board Estimates are clearly evident. The DD/I will furnish the DD/S&T with copies of all pertinent USIB briefing memoranda for the DDCI and DCI. Marshall S. Carter Lieutenant General, USA Deputy Director cc: Inspector General Legislative Counsel Comptroller D/DCI/NIPE b/DCI (Mr. Elder) Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000300040001-6 Abbftved`For'Pelease 2 {~G11 31 { ~~A-R` (8 f R00 3' 564'00 -6 Laic" w . ! 0 ` 1ur=e , am. 1. < mw r= ,= +a .,,. 4 -, o 1575 on ~C //C cs. .~+ IP t1,m ~',e,'1 ,., ".' +? ~b,.t ~`.i.L ',~;;a Cv4 d.:, e Ww ?.e,a '~-'.' a 41c+.:.GS ? t~M+ Wvv V I T 3.i the In t w t ht e i fbr ' u 1:7'.: l' at z 1 ...,' .'tr# % :?~:?u 1 y oz&, ' ln'"z"'?$ z' .,,. `..,,, -.e',1v`la V.i C11--Acv C vcz c 3 a C Y ct" Q Str,-l w.:. tc