GRADE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AGENCY POSITIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R000200040005-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 17, 2002
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 26, 1965
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R000200040005-3.pdf127.63 KB
Body: 
M lORANI1JM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller SUBJECT . Grade Control System for Agency Positions B'1CE Action Memorandum A-436 dated 23 January 1965 1. This memorandum contains a recommendation for your approval in paragraph 6. 2. Action Memorandum A-436 states there shall be no upgradings until an appropriate monetary and grade control system is established. In view the of the stringent average salary controls that have been lev vied the Agency's Agency, it is necessary to maintain a very prudent approac to grade structure and any changes thereto 3. Upgrading of positions is but one of several ways in which the average grade level may be raised. Others are: establishment of a new position above the average grade, deletion of a position below the average grade, simultaneous establishment and deletion of positions at different grade levels, and overall reorganization of a component. to deny for any length of time all 1.. It is undesirable, however, and neces- approved least and so long sary of individual position g es or otherwise at sary organizational changes. We propose therefore that, as the current average grade and glary restrictions are in force, the following guides apply: osition upgradings be made only when compensating a. Individual p downgradings on an equivalent grsde_l?or-grade basis are made. aitions be established only with corresponding deletions b. Revs Po of positions of equal or higher grade. c. Addition of new positions without corresponding deletions must be at the average grade and salary level or below. d. overall reorganizations must be accomplished within the existing average grade and salary level. e. There shall be no increase in the t tt oicf sitio s at GS-l4 and above, including supergradaso Pay Schdule positions. required 5. Exceptions to the guides stated in paragraph 4 may be re?srequnr in some instances. For example, the elimination of several pint in as below average grade without establishing new positions may o increase in average grade. Also, the establishment of a new function requiring new positions may require an increase in average grade or the Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : G RDP B01 676R000200040005-3 do Release 2002/08/2 ? : A- P80BO1676RA200040005-3 SUBJECT: Grade Control System for Agency Positions addition of a position at GS-14 or higher. In order to hold such excep- tions to a minimum and to permit only those which are fully justified and defensible, we propose that exceptions require your approval. 6. It is recommended that the guides stated in paragraph 4 and the provisions for exceptions stated in paragraph 5 be approved. /s/ "1rr.,me~t D. 2e1ois Emmett D. Echols Director of Personnel CONCURRENCE: L. K. ite Deputy Director for Support The recommendation in paragraph 6 is approved. (signed) Lyman B. Kirkpatrick P. Kirkpatrick Executive Director-Comptroller Distribution: 0 - Return to D/Pers . .. BPAX 2_DD/S 1 D/Pers 2 > ON OWD (w/held) OP/BWD:I[(12 February 1905) Rewrittent Pers (17 February 1965) Date 8 MAR 1964 Date 2 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : Cbif0B01676R000200040005-3