MINIMAL AWARDS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 67
• Document Creation Date: December 14, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 19, 2002
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: November 20, 1975
• Content Type: SUMMARY

Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
MINIMAL AWARDS
20 NOVEMBER 1975
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
El UNCLASSIFIED Appigectintbease 2003/01/29: CliQDROMAANT10003000
SECRET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
vietBJECT: (Optional)
FROM: EXECOTivE
SUGGESTION AND A.CilIEVEMENT
AWARDS COMMITTEE
5?E-54, HEADQUARTERS
EXTENSION
NO.
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
DATE
18 NOV 1975
RECEIVED FORWARDED
OFFICER'S
INITIALS
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
? DC/BSD
5h 69 Hqs.
'be`
2. C/BSD
5E 69 Hqs.
? DD/Pers/SP
SE 69 Hqs.
1 9 NOV 1975
4. DD/Pers
SE 58 Hqs.
20 NOV
7
? Chairman, SAAC
5E 58 Hqs.
8. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
SUGGESTION AND ACHIEVEMENT
AWARDS COMMITTEE
9. 5?E-541 HEADQUARTERS
10.
1 2.
13.
14.
1-4: For your information.
5: Attached are seventeen
(17) Minimal Awards
for your approval.
?
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 ? riti-RnpRn-n0706A000100030001 2
FORM 610 USE PREVIOUS UNCLASSIFIED
INTERNAL
EDITIONS El3-62 SECRET El CONFIDENTIAL 1,--1 USE ONLY
25X1
25X1A
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SECRET
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
25X1A
SUGGESTION NO. 73-298: dated 27 February 1973
NAIW
GS-11
Analyst
Directorate of Intelligence/CRS
A. Summary of Suggestion
The suggester proposed a Photo Briefing Album for
the various levels of each Directorate. Also, he
suggested that photos of the DCI, DDCI, IG and other
top level officials be included. The advantage would
be to provide all personnel with an awareness of the
appearance of their superiors and facilitate recognition
when such officers might appear within their office
area. Distribution would be limited to the Directorate
to which they applied. The suggester thought it would
be advisable to retain the albums in appropriate
Personnel Offices and make distribution semi-annually
together with the "Regulations on Conduct". Also,
a couple of blank spaces could be included for insertion
of appropriate Division and Branch Chiefs photos so
that the album could also be used in the orientation of
new personnel.
B. Evaluations
1. The Management Advisory Group (MAG) first
received this suggestion in response to their Headquarters
Notice of January 1973. The MAG said that they agreed
it was a worthwhile idea but could best be handled by
the Suggestion Awards Committee. Furthermore, in view
of the numerous high level personnel changes that had
recently taken place, MAG believed that this was a
valid suggestion and endorsed it.
SECRET]
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A00010000001-2
25X1
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
CRET
2. This idea was referred among the directorates
and key Agency Offices for study and evaluation and
was given much consideration. Summary of reports from
the various components;
a. The CIA Librarian, who had received the
suggestion for comment from the DDI Committee Member,
discussed the proposal with the suggester and two
members of the MAG group. It was concluded that:
many components in the Agency already had such books
and that if others would be added they all might not
reach as many employees as the suggester intended; and,
most employees might not likely go to the component
personnel office or administrative office for this
kind of information. One member of MAG suggested that
the CIA Library might be the appropriate place in
which to post the pictures of the officials which the
suggester wished to publicize. An area above the card
catalogs was suggested with photos of the officials
occupying the positions listed on the attached chart
and also include the Associate Deputy Director of each
directorate. Since the Library is locked at night,
this would provide some security.
b. OS had for several years posted pictures
of the DCI, DUCT, DD/A, Director of Security and
Deputy Director of Security in the OS Security Records
Division. OS added photos of the DDO, DDI and DD/SU
as a direct result of this suggestion.
c. DDO thought that such a photo briefing
album would serve a useful purpose and enable Directorate
personnel to recognize their key officers. For security
reasons, the DDO believed that only the name and title
of the individual should appear in the photo album with
no other identifying or biographic information. The DDO
evaluation stated that it would be a good point to have
photos of the DCI, DDCI and other top-level positions
in the album. Also, they thought that each Directorate
should have a photo of the Deputy Director and Associate
of each other Directorate in the album. Finally, the
album should be brought to the attention of incoming
personnel and annually or semi-annually be brought to
the attention of directorate personnel. However, the
DDO delayed action on this project because of the
alternate proposal under discussion to post pictures
of Agency officials in the CIA Library as mentioned in
a, above.
2
C.17 CRET
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
tt
d. NPIC and OC had photo albums which served.
to bring employees up-to-date on the key officers on
duty in their areas. Imagery Analysis Service, as a
management aid, uses a wall display which combines
individual photos with brief personnel and organizational
data butonly on IAS people.
e. PD/S1 has a Photo Briefing Album Similar
to that proposed in the suggestion. It is used for
briefing purposes. DI)/ST has encouraged the prepaxa-
tion and .use of similar albums at the office levels,
?
f. OL; OF and declined the use of such. STATSPEC
an album in their areas. Finally, the Fine Arts
Commission which at one time endorsed the concept of
having photos of senior Agency officials bung in the
Library- stated that the present'membership did not
believe that such photos would add to the attractiveness
of'our decor. FAC said that they believe it is a
question as to whether the benefits of having such a
display outweigh what they consider to be the artistic
disadvantages FAC concluded by saying that if it is
decided to go ahead with this project, they would be
glad to offer suggestions as to the most appropriate
method of mounting the display:.
Chief, CRS was then asked for a final
evaluation as to the advisability of having- a photo-
board in the CIA Library of senior officials and said
the practice of putting up pictures of senior officials
on the classified bulletin board seems to have made .
the suggestion at least in part obsolete; I don't think
the picture board would help the Libraryls ambiance and
would prefer not to have it there; and I don't think
this kind of a board is what the new employee needs
anyway; he needs something that is much more relevant
to his own environment and for that reason CRS has
a show-and-tell boot for new employees; and., I think
the ideal place for an Agency -level board would be on
the same wall as the employee bulletin board and that
the Associate Deputy Directors would be about as far
down as we would have to go.
Ii. In April 1974, Chief, BSD/OP, who is charged
with the operation of the Agency Classified Bulletin
Boards, stated tnat it is planned to continue to post
photos of selected senior officials on the classified
board and these will get greater exposure when classified
boards are placed in other buildings.
3
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
.44
Approved For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
i. Finally, after the CRS veto of a photo
board in the CIA Library, an answer was requested
of the DDO about the implementation of a photo briefing
notebook. Current DDO position as stated by the
Associate DDO is: "This is not a good time to adopt
this proposal for DDO." The DDO Committee Member
thought it might be best to ask the DDO about this
idea again in about nine months at which time there
may be new legislation, less demands for material,
less chance of security flaps, etc.
C. Comments and Recommendations of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. Comments:
a. This case, as will be noted, has had much
Agency-wide study and analysis which could be of value
if the subject is considered again at a later date.
To date, the suggestion has caused some offices, such
as OS, to enlarge their former photo coverage of Agency
officials. It has served to remind others of the
advantages of using their existing albums for briefing
new employees, etc.
b. Finally, during the lengthy period that
this proposal has been under evaluation, other measures
have been undertaken by Management in conjunction with
other programs which represent adoption of a portion
of the intent of the suggester's proposal. The
measures included the posting of photos of some Agency
senior officials on the Agency Classified Bulletin
Boards and the mounting of photos of DDI senior
officials to include office and staff chiefs on the new
DDI Classified Bulletin Board.
3. Recommend an interim award of $75 (MODERATE/
EXTENDED) and referral again to the DDO in about nine
months to ascertain if they then wish to implement
a Photo Briefing Album.
4
A y
cL..11
Approved For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
D.
25X1A
Approved For Release 20Ork IA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Decision of the Chairman
Chairrn
Awards Committee
Award
Att
CIA Organization Chart
--Karaevement
5
zo 7ir
Date
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
t?-.1
CR
Revised: 18 March 1975 (899)
DERUTY DOI!, !le
NATIONAL ,NTELL:GENCE OFFICERS
E,fECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
eM,CE s' the
CENERAE COL:NS:EL
DEHATY DIRECTOR
fs- :N7ELLIGENEE
C.:a OI if RAT (f)f,IfACEf.:7!
COLLECTION GUIDANCE and
ASSESSMENTS SEAFF
CEFICE At II-J,,W,N7 !NT L.LI.ICINCA
Lb of GE'eaTEIDE: 'ESEARCH
i,L i
UI ICC I29LCIICAL RESEARCH
GEFICL of GEOGRAPHIC aes
EARTOGR^Hhi!C REErAorR
CEN ? RAE P., _REN...E SERVICE
IMAGERY ANALYSIS SERVICE
COVIREE STAFF
CIDDCE 01 the
LEGISLATIVE
COUNSEL
DIRECTOR
OF
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
Of-
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
DEPUTY OfRECTOR for
SC.LENCE and TECHNOLOGY
orric.T FhINT
OFF !GE RI DEVELOPMENT and
ENGINEERING
OFFICE ,1! WEAPONS :NTELLIGENCE
OFFICE of SC!ENT'FIC INTEEL:GENCF
()EPEE st RESEARCH ;:ncl
DEVELOP MI TNT
OFFICE 0! TECHNICAL SERVDDE
NATIONAL RHCFOGRAPHIC
INTERPREEATION CEN7ER
SIR
11111111.111?111.1???111?1011
DEPjhe 's DCI for fEe
GTEEAGENCE COM MU 5170
CIA VANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
OFFICES! the
INSPECTOR GENERAL
DEPUTd DiRECTOR
ADMINISTRAT!ON
0EFICE of CON' A1UNICA !ONS
OFFICE s! LOGISTICS
OFFICE of FINANCE A
OFFICE of SECURtTe
OFFICE of VEGICAL SERVICES
DEEICE 114.515150
j'FICE of PERSONNEL
OREICE of JOIN"'
COMPUTER SUPPORE
OFFICE o! the
COMPTROLLER
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
forOPERATfONS
I'. AND s7nr,
OEfERATIONS STAFF
SERM'CES STAFF
COVER and CCfAMERCIAL STAFF
COLINTER INTELL'GENCE
DeE RA7IONS
EG/GET/EAST EUROPEAN DIVISION
EAST ASIA DIetS,!ON
NEAR EAST and SOUTH
ASIA D!VISION
LATIN AMERICA 01515105
AER.ICA DIVISION
EUROPEAN DIVISION
MOLINZIMV0110
25X1A
25X1A
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
25X1A
iond
rod
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
oNFLENTIAL
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 74-172: dated 5 November 1973
., GS-11
Intelligence Analyst
Directorate of Administration/OC
A. Summary of Suggestion
Attached is a detailed description of the
suggestion to eliminate unnecessary steps in Agency
pouch accountability.
B. Evaluations
1. OC said that effective 1 April 1957, Head-
quarters return of receipted pouch manifests to field
stations was discontinued (Book Dispatch No. 226 from
Chief, Headquarters, RI, attached). In October 1972,
OC eliminated the return of receipted manifests to
Headquarters from Area Headquarters (RMS-72-038,
attached). OC adopted the recommendation to eliminate
the return of receipted manifests by field stations
to Headquarters. The receiving station is now respon-
sible for monitoring receipt of incoming pouches.
The return of receipted pouch manifests verifies receipt
of a pouch and is an important security check for
stations that receive or pouch infrequently. Since
many field lateral pouches are accomplished on an
infrequent and irregular basis, OC is continuing the
exchange of receipted manifests for lateral field
pouches. Annual tangible savings to OC are:
Signing and returning
receipted pouch manifests:
10 hours per year x $4.09
per hour (GS-5)
itIFIDENTIAL
40.90
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Relea -RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
a
Filing of receipted
manifests: 4 man-
hours per week x 52
weeks per year = 208
man-hours annually x
$4.09 per hour (GS-5)
Conducting pouch mani-
fest checks: 6 man-
hours per check x 8.67
checks per year (one
every six weeks) = 52
man-hours per year x
$4.09 per hour (GS-5)
$ 850.72
212.68
TOTAL $1,104.30
2. Forms 748 and 2439 were discontinued as a
result of this suggestion, resulting in the following
savings:
Form No. Annual Cost Annual Volume
748 $ 15.00 1,500
2439 720.00 2,000
$735.00 annual savings
by discontinuance
Because of the continuous annual reduction in the above
forms through the Organization's pouch system, intangible
benefits of MODERATE/LIMITED are believed appropriate.
Forms 255a and 255b were marked for abolishment by DDO/
RMO prior to receipt of the suggestion.
3. DDO/Records Management Officer said that the
suggestion will not be implemented throughout the DDO
because the requirements for good security and manage-
ment would place a burden on field installations beyond
that which we could reasonably expect to have carried
out. n; the I Ifield installations, less
than lhave full-time registry employees. Pouches
for the remaining installations are often handled by
persons who were often not trained in pouch handling.
It would be unwise to place on these persons the
responsibility to account for "missing" pouches sent
from Headquarters. Also, the receipt shows the exact
pouching time - this is frequently important especially
for lateral pouches; and, receipt allows for informal
2
Approved For Release 2q03/9-1428i.GyfiNIP80-00706A000100030001-2
LIL.11 IIAL
25X1A
4lierY
25X1A
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
alba
communications in regard to pouching - such as
correcting errors in content listings on manifests.
DDO/RMO concurred in the savings realized by OC
adoption of the suggestion.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $175 award based on annual savings of
$1,839 ($145) plus MODERATE/LIMITED intangible benefits
($30).
D. Decision of the Chairman
Atts
Chairman, suggestion ap.d Achievement
Awards Committee
ff117.5". c?17
Award
%.,c, Zs-
Date
3
Approved For Release
: ADP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved kap Reltialfittna.ICIA-RDP80-001116A000100030001-2
TITLE: Eliminating unnecessary steps in Agency pouch
accountability,
I. PRESENT METHOD - Agency pouch procedures require the return
of a receipted copy of a pouch manifest to the originating station
Headquarters, however, does not return manifests to field stations
and assumes receipt unless notified otherwise. OC Field stations
do return manifests laterally in addition to returning manifests
to Headquarters. OC procedures exempt OC Area Headquarters from
returning manifests to Headquarters. If a receipted manifest is
missing, Form 2439 or 748 (Pouch and Manifest Tracer) is employed.
II. Form 255 Pouch Manifest (3 part, NCR) is currently used
as follows:
1. Suspense Copy (Pink) of Form 255 is filed.
2. White and Yellow copies are sent to addressee-
Yellow copy is retained by addressee for their files.
3. White copy is receipted and returned to sender by
entering as a line item on a subsequent pouch
manifest to Hqs or a lateral station.
4. Headquarters "In Pouch Unit" checks off manifest and
outgoing manifest copy goes to file.
5. Manifests are arranged alphabetically (Station)
and then placed in numerical order.
6. Suspense copy (pink) is then removed from station
file and substituted with receipted white copy.
III. A manifest check is conducted periodically to determine
if a receipted manifest is missing.
IV. Forms 2439 and 748 (Pouch and Manifest Tracer)
are being used by OC and DDO (others?)
I. SUGGESTION(S):
1. Current Pouch procedures be amended to eliminate the return
of receipted manifests.
2. Each station be responsible for monitoring receipt of pouches.
Originating station will assume receipt unless notified other-
wise
3. Reduce Form 255 (pouch manifest) from present three parts to
two parts.
4. Eliminate Forms 2439 and 748
5. Eliminate receipted Pouch Manifest Check.
Approved For Release 2ORMEIMATP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For ReleClINEIDINDALIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
ADVANTAGES'w
If a pouch is missing either in Headquarters or Field, this
would be easily detected as pouches are controlled numerically.
To trace a "missing pouch" a routine administrative cable would
suffice. If this suggestion is implemented, it would eliminate
the need for Forms 2439 and 748. OC uses both cables and Pouch
Manifest Tracer. The latter is used to trace missing receipted
pouch manifests.
Most (all?) registrys conduct a receipted "Manifest
Check" by checking the appropriate files to determine if a
receipted pouch manifest has been returned. With the above
suggested method this procedure could be eliminated as a
"missing manifest" would be flagged by the routine administrative
cable mentioned earlier.
III. SAVINGS:
Am not able to compute the actual dollar savings,
personnel wise, however, the man hours involved, Agency
wide, would be tremendous. The cost of forms can be measured.
The Agency presently uses about 88,800 Pouch Manifests per year
The cost per 100 is $1.70 or $1,509.60 per year direct cost
as these forms are printed commercially. Reducing Form 255
to two parts would be an obvious saving. In addition, the
entire cost for printing forms 2439 and 748, would be saved.
Att: Copies of Forms
748 F 2439
Approved For ReleaseeliN
BAIRDP80-00706A000100030001-2
25X1A
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SECRET
(When Filled In)
Nirrof
I ?awe
STATION
DATE
IOUR RECORDS INDICATE THE FOLLOWING (FIELD/HQ POUCH NUMBER - HQ/FIELD RECEIPTED MANIFEST) AS BEING UN-
ACCOUNTED FOR:
iPOUCH NUMBER(S)
MANIFEST NUMBER(S)
DATE(S)
1
I
ADVISE PROMPTLY IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW AS TO THE DISPOSI-
NUMBER(S).
THAT THE ATTACHED DUPLICATE COPY(IES) OR THE WHITE SIGNATURE
FIELD/HQ POUCH NUMBER(S): PLEASE
TION OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED POUCH
1
HO/FIELD MANIFEST(S): IT IS REQUESTED
COPY(IES) BE SIGNED AND RETURNED.
1 REMARKS
1
I
I
REPLY
rTO:
DATE
1
I
I
I
I
F ORM 7u.g p RhpArsoygcl,Fpf Release 2003/01/29sE?WRDP80-00706A000100030001-2
(13)
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
CONFIDENTIAL
(When Filled In)
POUCH AND MANIFEST TRACER
.
FROM:
CHIEF,
DATEI
Our records indicate the following meadquartera pouch manifest(s) have not been returned. Please fill in the
date, if received, and sign below. If a pouch has not been received, notify Readquarters via RADNOTE cable.
POUCH AND MANIFEST NUMBER
DATE POUCHED
DATE RECEIVED
IN FIELD
MS
AM
SS
GNATURE:
Mg
DATE:
FORM 014340 ilsE PREVIOUS
1-.72 4. EDITIONS
dui
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
(13) STAT
ApprovedZpr Release 2003/01/29: CIA-R13080-CRW06A000100030001-2
WN Mn
1,..Vectiy Mr or Vouch-)
S-E-C-R-E-T
CLASSIFICATION
TO Chiefs of All Stations and Baserim
Chief, Headquarters RI
GENESIAL Administrative
SUBJECT
FROM
SPECIFIC Return of Pouch Manifests
Action Required: For information Only
.hIli1r1fi57.
Field registry personnel are ashed to note that, effective
1 April 1957, blue copies oT pouch manifests received in Head-
quarters will no longer be returned to field installations.
Delinquent pouches are discovered at Headquarters through a
careful chock og incoming manifests and are traced by means
oT the RI Pouch and Manifest Tracer, (rorm No. WC), thus
mating return ol the blue manifests a duplicate effort.
(6 March 1957)
Distribution:
1 - A11 Stations and Bases.
S-E-C-R-E-T
?
CLASSIFICATION
room tio. 5@p263v
ed For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
W111949
25X1A
la New'
Approfted Fite Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP864071161N000100030001-2
ri-)) T7167-I FIJI
Li L) 1.1 61
CASSIFICAFICIN
CO:s:FIbEJIAL
hicr,
PROCESSING ACTION
MARKEL) MR INDEXING
NO INDEXING REQUIRED
ONLY QUALIFIED DESK
CAN JUDGE INDEXING
om ,
hicf
?
4.110
veturn Pouch ilanifests - Form 255
WTMW
310, IEQUIRED ? REFERENCES
REF:
21X1A
Chapter V Para 2
1. Effective -upon receipt of this dispatch it will not be
ecessary to return to signed pouch manifests acknowledging
receipt. This procedure. applies only to Area Headquarters.
' 2. Area Headquarters will be responsible for the accountability
ef all pouches received from If a pouch is suspected to be
m: 7,ing, a connand cable should be forwarded to advising
Irepouch number involved.
. istributien:
. 4, less
251.1
SS RI RENCE TO
25X1
4.1
DISPATOI SYMBOL AND NUMBER
Approve For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP8 V0706A00010003901-2.
I'S.,
I.
1105 FIll hilIMEIFR
X1A
X1A
X1A
25X1A
25X1A
25X1A
Jul
AMP
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 74-309: ated 7c) Jnnilary 1Q7A
I
instructor
Directorate of Administration/
OTR
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background.
The fire extinguishers on the sixth floor of
Chamber of Commerce Building were Type A - e.g. wood
(non-electrical) fires. They contained a prohibition
for electrical use. The installation of the 20 computer
terminals and associated electrical equipment presented
a fire hazard in view of the known tenAancy for the
TT-37 power supply to overheat.
2. Suggestion
gip a. Install an electrical-type fire extinguisher
in Room 616 Chamber of Commerce Building.
am b. Make an Agency-wide survey to determine
other computer terminal installations which are
inadequately protected.
B. Evaluations
1. Safety Branch/OS, made a comprehensive safety
survey of all Agency facilities in the Washington. area
containing computer terminals. The survey revealed
that 275 rooms contained a total of 862 terminals. All
of these areas, however, did not present the same fire
potential, i.e., some rooms had only one terminal vs.
28 in others. One single terminal unit, regardless of
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
cost, presents a fire potential slightly more than an
IBM selectric typewriter. Five to twenty-eight
terminals, however, increases the fire potential. Some
of the larger areas are already protected with portable
fire extinguishers to meet the existing potential but
some are not. OS/Safety Branch recommended that the
terminals which are not provided with the adequate
protection be supplied with the proper extinguishers.
The CIA Safety Officer rated intangible benefits
MODERATE/BROAD.
2. Space Maintenance and Facilities Branch/OL,
installed additional fire extinguishers in Agency
buildings as requested by Safety Branch:
Headquarters 5 lb. Extinguisher 9 each
15 lb. Extinguisher 10 each
Ames 5 lb. Extinguisher 1 each
15 lb. Extinguisher 1 each
A total of 21 extinguishers were installed by General
Services Administration.
The total cost of purchase and installation of
the added fire extinguishers was $592.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $100 award (MODERATE/BROAD).
D. Decision of the Chairman
Chairm
Awards Committee
>i-/C,d,cc5
Award
Zo ricfrv
Achievement Date
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 74-364. dated 22 February 1974
claims Assistant
Directorate of Administration/
OP (Resigned)
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
Association Benefit Plan insurance policy holders
obtained itemized bills from their doctors and submitted
them to Insurance Branch for appropriate claims processing.
2. Suggestion
The suggester designed a form, attached, to be
completed by the doctor and submitted direct to the
Association Benefit Plan. This method simplifies the
process of making claims; often times policy holders
encountered difficulties in obtaining itemized doctor
bills. The form improves communication between physicians
and the insurance company, eliminates time and frustration
on the part of policy holders and reduces the number of
calls the insurance claims adjuster must make to the doctor
to obtain the needed information to finalize the claim.
B. Evaluation
1. Insurance Branch began using the new form in
mid-March 1975 (attached). It is estimated that 5,000 of
the forms will be used annually. The form improves
Insurance Branch efficiency and eliminates the filing and
storage of many separate physician statements as well as
saving time for the claimant.
2. Forms Management said that the forms cost about
$200 annually.
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
STP11
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $75 award (MODERATE/EXTENDED).
D. Decision of the Chairman
Atts
i475Chairman, Suggestiejand Achievement Date
Awards Committee
Award
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
*10
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HEALTH ASSOCIATION
CLAIM FORM
FORWARD COMPLETED CLAIM FORM TO: GERA, P. O. BOX 463, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20044
To Be Completed By Insured Member
1. Insured's name Date of birth
Address
2.
-3
(Street & Number) (City) (State (Zip Code)
Policy No.
Cert. No.
Date of
If claim is for a dependent, give name Relationship birth
Give nature of sickness or injury
DID THIS INJURY OR SICKNESS ARISE OUT OF OR IN THE COURSE OF EMPLOYMENT? Yes L:7 No L=7
If yes, please explain
DOUBLE COVERAGE (See section in your official brochure entitled "DOUBLE COVERAGE.")
.ca) Spouse's or other dependent's occupation Name of employer
(b) Are you or any member of your family covered under any other plan or plans for which
payroll deductions are made, or for which an employer makes a co tributign in whole or
in part, which provides benefits for accident or illness? Yes No L./
If "yes," give name and address of insurance company or other organization providing
such coverage
c) Are you or your spouse covered under Health
Security (Me care)?
SELF: Yes L/ No L=7 SPOUSE: Yes LI-7 No
If "yes," indicate your egverage by checki
SELF: Hospital Only Medical Only
SPOUSE: Hospital Only Medical Only
Insurance for the Aged under Social
appropriate blocks:
Hospital & Medical
Hospital & Medical
,f-eipy certify that the foregoing statements, including any accompanying statements, are
4,0 4;ne best of my knowledge and belief true, correct and complete. I hereby authorize any
AO
physician or any hospital to furnish and disclose all known facts concerning this disability.
understand that in executing this authorization I waive the right for such information to
be priviledged. A copy or photocopy of this authorization shall be as valid as the original.
Date
,19 Signed
Fika ATTAW gia
(Signature of Insured)
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 ._? CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
TO BE 5 i6 NED 8P(11)RD I r Bet4eFITS Akg 70 BE !hip To THE DoCrOat.
SIGNED (INSURED PERSON)
1; A ION TO PAY BENEM 5 TO PI ? :IAN: I hereby
poyment ditectly to the undersi(Into physician of tha
`,ninical and/or Medical Benefits, if any, otherwise payable to me
his services as described below but not to exceed the reason-
able and customary charge for those services.
Dote
sluanam BY ATTENDING PHYSICIAN
(To Be Completed by Attending Physicioni
And Forwarded To The Address Shown On The Revtiree)
08vew-se
rAT?ENTIS NAME
AGE
WAS PATIENT: HOSPITAL INPATIENT 0 HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT 0 DOCTOR'S OFFICE PAT1Et
SURGERY
OR
ODSTETRICS
2)
DATE PROCEDURE:
CHARGE
DATE ----PROCEDURE:
CHARGE
EMERGENCY
TREATMENT
1)
2)
DATE INJURED DATE SICKNESS BEGAN
DID INJURY OR SICKNESS ARISE FROM PATIENT'S EMPLOYMENT? 0 YES
0 NO
1100
COMPLAINTS
AND
DIAGNOSIS
1'; DISABILITY RELATED TO PREGNANCY? 0 YES 0 NO DATE 05 LMP
RELATED SERVICES RENDERED
orricr.
DATE
CHARGE
DATE
CHARGE
AND HOME
vvmrs
DATE
DATE
CHARGE
CHARGE
DATE
DATE
CHARGE
CHARGE
X .RAYS
X?RAY
DATE
CHARGE
X?RAY
DATE
CHARGE
AND
TEST
DATE
CHARGE
TEST
DATE
CHARGE
An TESTS
TEST
DATE
CHARGE
TEST
DATE
CHARGE
Tw3PITAL
DATES
EACH =
V (SITS
DATES
@s
EACH =
DATES
@s
EACH
TOTAL ALL CHARGES $
TYPE OR
ullycHciANtS NAME: PRINT M.D. DATE
Ar.N Hrop .
1.)A I.: 01
5EF2V ICE
M.D. PHONE NO.
INDIVIDUAL PRACTITIONERS ? SS #
ALL OTHERS ? EMPLOYER I.D. #
MISCELLANEOUS ILLNESSES
COMPLAINT
OR DIAGNOSIS
TYPE OF SERVICE
SIGNATURE CITY AND
OF M.D. PHONE
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
CHARGE
TH iNSURANcL Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
,L CLAIM
ART A Nlie TO RE
Name and Address (Please in COMPLETED BY PATIENTude Zip Code)
Aloof
Date of Birth
;ured's Name if Patient is a Dependent
ame of Insurance Company
VITUAL OF OMAHA
Policy Number
5,000
Certificate Number
lame of Association through whom Insured
kird,OCIATED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, P.O. Box 1751, Washington, D. C. 20013
Signed (Insured Person)
Date
I MIN 10 ',AY null mn Ti) PHYSICIAN1 I hereby nurhoriro
ihr Il Oro mulorsiFund Physician of ha Surgical andier Medical
,1 ;Inv, oilicrwir,o payahin to tuu fur Ids serylcus as described below
ii 11)11 !anon:Alla nod customary charge for those sorvicos,
it Ai loll tO 111.11FIF INFORMATION) I hereby authoriza lb. under.
m of Information actluIrnd In tile t0111111 Of my
'
Signed (Patient, or Parent if Minor
Date
PART B ATTENDING PHYSICIAN'S STATEMENT
1 Diagnosis and Concurrent Conditions (If Diagnosis code other than ICDA* used, give name):'
am
Is condition due to injury or sickness arising out of patient's employment? Yes// No Li
Pregnancy? Yes T7 No /7 If Yes, approximate date pregnancy commenced. DATE:
eport of Services (or attach itemized bill)
Date of Services
Place of Services Description of Surgical (51..
Medical Services Rendered
Doctor's Office IH - Inpatient Hospital
- Patient's Home OH - Outpatient Hospital
*TCDA-International Classification of Diseases
*--J3T-Current Procedural Terminology (current edition)
NH- Nursing Home
OL-Other Locations
PROCEDDID:
CODE //, 11111:0
CODE OTIIER 1I1AN
CDT** 1,./SED4___GIVE NAME)._
Total Charges $
Amount Paid $
Balance Due
Charges
4,10 Date symptoms first appeared or accident happened.
. Date patient first consulted you
for this condition.
, Patient ever had same or similar condition?
Yes /7 No /7 If "Yes" when and describe.
. Patient still under your care for
this condition? Yes /7 No /7
Patient was continuously totally disabled
Mil (unable to work) From Thru
. Patient was partially disabled
From Thru
10. If still disabled, date patient should be able to
. return to work.
11. Patient was house confined.
From Thru
14i, Does patient have other health coverage?
Yes /7 No /7 If "Yes" please identify.
13.
I do not accept assignment.
5Tt4ePhysician's Name (print) Degree
Pt sician's Signature Telephone
vie
Individual Practitioners -SS#
All Others-Employer I.D.#
Must Be Furnished Under AuthoritY of Law
Street Address City or Town
State or Province Zip Code
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release
TTri
91;1:clARDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 74-521: dated 10 May 1974
L, GS-07
Intelligence Assistant
Directorate of Science and
Technology/NPIC
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
Holding film flat so that it would remain in
focus on the Zoom 240 Stereoscope presented a problem.
Photo interpreters used weighted rubber rings and "L's"
to solve the problem for the static viewing situation;
however, the weighted rings and "L's" were a problem
when the optics or the film was moved constantly during
the search phase.
2. Suggestion
The suggester designed a "Film Hold-Down
Collar" (photo attached) to fit around the barrel of
the 2x mono search lens of the Zoom 240 Stereoscope.
When in use, the collar is allowed to drop the film
surface where it holds the film beneath the lens flat
by the collar's own weight. The film or the optics
can be moved at will without further attention to the
collar. The collar keeps the film flat constantly when
searching with the 2x mono lens and eliminates constant
readjusting of the focus or moving of the Richards hold-
down rings.
B. Evaluation
1. NPIC said the prototype of the "Film Hold-
Down Collar" was made in-house. The collars are now
being made by an outside contractor at a cost of $7.04
each. The primary operation of NPIC/Imagery Exploitation
Approved For Release 20031614191J.'C1AL141V80-00706A000100030001-2
STATI NTL
awl NNW
ANI
STATI NTL
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
ADMINISTRATIVE
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Group is to search the film on a timely basis. This
suggestion is one of the few improvements to the search
function. Many human engineering studies performed
for NPIC have established the difficulties the photo
interpreter must overcome to maintain an alert search
posture throughout his workday. The need to constantly
refocus the Zoom 240 Stereoscope while searching or
use cumbersome hold-down rings or bars was a hindrance
in the Pl's ability to comfortably search during an
entire day. The collar rides with the film, over-
coming the necessity to constantly refocus the Zoom 240
Stereoscope as the PI searches. Use of the collar is
optional. If a PI chooses, he can slide it up the
barrel and out of the way. He also can do this when
switching from lx mono or stereo. The device is then
in place and ready to use when he returns to 2x mono.
2. NPIC/IEG purchased 330 of the collars for
distribution to each of their PI's; DIR-5 (DIA) purchased
225; IAS has 120 on order; and, SPAD has purchased some
of tne collars. Since any organization with a 2x barrel
scope can use the collar, NPIC will canvas the Intelligence
Community for other users.
C. Recommendation of the Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $200 interim award (SUBSTANTIAL/EXTENDED).
3. Review in one (1) year to determine further
use of the collar by Intelligence Community organizations.
D. Decision of the Chairman
Att
Chairman, Suggestiono/d Achievement
Awards Committee
4124,0
Award
20 Aloof
Date
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29,:,C1A+REIP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
"FILM HOLD-DOWN COLLAR"
lilmiletcr -
['eight
)11
1 1 / 4"
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Releas60itiliaTALRDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-44: dated 22 July 1974
1, GS-05
Information Control Clerk
Directorate of Operations/ISG
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
Incoming pouches received in Information
Processing/Dispatch and Pouch Section are unwrapped
(often 2 or more wrappings). The classified markings
are cut off and deposited in classified trash bags.
The unclassified portion of the wrappings were placed
in a trash truck for later disposal in the trash
room. The trash truck often had to be emptied more than
once a day and took up a large area of Dispatch and
Pouch Section.
2. Suggestion
Use a trash compactor to dispose of the
unclassified portion of pouch wrappings.
B. Evaluations
1. IP/Dispatch and Pouch Section purchased a
trash compactor at a cost of $3,300 and began using
it on 3 July 1975 (brochure attached). The trash
compactor is approximately the size of a four (4)
drawer safe, resulting in a savings of about three (3)
square feet of floor space over the former trash truck.
Use of the trash compactor minimizes the possibility of
mixing classified material with the unclassified trash.
LJAFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A0001 0030001-2
25X1A
25X1
IMO
-Noose
25X1A
Approved For Releak 11c AA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
On one occasion when manifests of incoming pouches
were being checked, it was discovered that one
pouch was missing. Upon further checking the pouch
was found in the unclassified trash. Apparently it
had slipped of the incoming mail cart.
2. C/IP/DU estimated man-hour savings to be
173 annually for two (2) employees to take the trash
to the trash room (20 minutes for each individual),
empty the trash, and return with the trash truck @ the
GS-04 rate of $3.84 per hour or an annual savings of
$664. Trash from the trash compactor is picked up
at the DU room by GSA personnel. Office of Security
concurred with the purchase of this equipment.
C. Recommendation of the Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $100 award base4 on annual savings of
$664 ($70), plus MODERATE/LIMITED ($30) intangible
benefits.
D. Decision of the Chairman
Att
75"
Chairman, Suggestionadd Achievement Date
Awards Committee
4C:ty
Award
2
,
5 .
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Ap_proved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
REFUSE
COMPACTORS
DESIGNED TO SOLVE
ALL SOLID WASTE
HANDLING SITUATIONS
A Division of UNION ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Symbol
HOW UNION-PAK
COMPACTORS FUNCTION
All solic waste, including
bottles and cans, regardless of
refuse Mix, is emptied into the
t),NIONTAK compactor. Rear
IRading,t.chute loading or
4tomat,c hopper loading
ITtodelS and accessories are
available providing total
loading flexibility.
?? i
The UNION-PAK solid, sturdy,
hydraulic ram compresses and
compacts waste and refuse to
a fraction of its original bulk,
(up to 20:1). With each stroke,
the automatic spray apparatus
deodorizes and disinfects.
Preiset package weight
capability automatically signals
when full. Built-in hand truck
"doily" provides for ease of
paclage handling.
Refuse is compacted into heavy
duty (5 mil.) plastic bags, or
wax-lined corrugated containers
or specially designed metal
containers. All UNION-PAK
models have a protective metal
sleeve that permits safe
Crpaction of metal and. glass
without fear of ripping or
tearino.
Compacted refuse takes up less space, cuts down danger of loo 'e refuse including rats, vermin, disease, ground
pollution, fire hazards. Compaction means labdr savings up to 59 percent in han4ling solid waste.
Only UNION-PAK Solid Waste Handling Systems offers unique l flexibility that means a solution to your solid
Waste Prdblem. There's flexibility in a wide range of basic compactor models, all built to UNIQN'S rugged quality
and ,perfdirmance standards, plus the flexibility of the UNION-PAK modular system that enables you to add
auxiliary equipment to any basic machine at any time in the future.
Rugged construction means less maintenance, less downtime. UNION-PAK performs better and lasts longer.
And _all over the United States and Canada UNION'S service and 'distribution network is there to help solve your
refu?e problems.
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
By removing the rear face plate of UNION-PAK compactor and
installing a customized trough-feeding device, quick, easy and
economical conversion for condemned chute-fed incinerators
is possible, without altering or modifying either the incinerator
chamber or the structure of the building. Union-Pak installation
engineers custom assemble feeding troughs on-site, utilizing
either 100, 200, or 300 series compactors. Machines converted
for manual trough-fed incinerator conversion are designated
Models 120D, 220, and 320.
Attached to the rear of Union-Pak compactors, Model 23U
Hopper Loaders are equipped with automatic sensing and
activating devices for non-attendant movement of refuse from
a building's built-in trash chute system directly into the Union-
Pak compactor for automatic non-attendant compaction.
Model 23U Hopper Loaders are protected with automatic
sprinkler systems for protection from fire, and have visual
and/or audio signaling devices to alert building maintenance
personnel when the machine has reached its preset package
weight. The Model 23U Hopper Loader is used in conjunction
with the Model 105D, 205 and 305 compactors.
Union-Pak compactors equipped with Automatic Hopper Load-
ers are designated and
respectively.
MODEL 21 THROUGH-WALL LOADER
A patented through-wall loading door developed for customized
built-in installations of Union-Pak compactors. The Model 21
features a safety devioe preventing its being opened during the
compaction cycle, and it is ideally suited for tenant-operated
apartment-house applications. The rear face-plate of the
Union-Pak compactor is removed, and the Model 21 loads
refuse into the back of the machine, allowing unimpeded
access to the front insertion opening for additional loading
capability, and to the hand-truck door for easy removal of the
refuse package.
Manufactured by
135 S. Nineteenth Street, Phila., Pa. 19103
THE ECOLOGY GROUP OF THE UNION CORPORATION.
Distributed and Serviced by:
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Of all thAePraiiiWttfiV Vtaregefi6buir,30001-2
only Union-Pak gives you
so many important benefits!
You can determine exactly how
much refuse you want com-
pacted in advance?and a red
light tells you when the pack-
age is filled to that point.
Rugged construction means
less maintenance, less down-
time. Union-Pak performs bet-
ter and lasts longer .
A protective sleeve prevents
bottles and cans from tearing
the b mil "union bag." The bag
catches liquids, keeps them
from spilling on floor. Saves
you time and mess.
A built-in dolly makes it much
easier to remove the package
filled with refuse. No struggle.
No strain. It simply rolls out.
I.
A special platen (ram) cover
prevents refuse arid liquids from
accumulating on top of the
platen (ram), reducing cleaning
maintenance.
You can feed the Union-Pak
through the front? or through
the rear. And you can easily
adapt it to be used with a can,
,lag, box or bale, i his flexibility
lets you get muci, inure use out
of the Union-Pak.
A layer of disin,ectant reduces
odor in the compactor and in
tile bags. It keeps things
cleaner and mo,e sanitary.
All in all, the UNION-PAK gives you 2i iii pur tarn
benefits. Some competitive models have SOry le of
these benefits. CAPPIrRIYAgIEPfiggiefftae)2803J017129
UNION-PAK and only UNION-PAK gives yo au i 21.
We invite you, encourage you, urge you to compare
before you buy. The more you know about all the
: cuakuNDOstileeddaftibvi URAioli_pe that UNION-
PAK gives you more compactor 617`your money.
03101M29:Jh
CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
t,
. i',
? ? . ?
The, e epl e9,' .,,, eons a e ecem er 1,1671, Sup riede ail
rikilotia informafron and spepifications relating to this
Pr-Improvement is a policy of
Ulriloil5tiEe-riri?ilirOC-n6riiii;frif;51-uc!?-1-15rpl'Prautioni,!herefpre all specifications
?111 0 ' IlmOitirCir
ate ect to thlihge'iatifout no ice.
SERIES 100
SERIES 200
SERIES 300
MODEL 23U
HOPPER LOADER
OVERALL
DIMENSIONS:
WEIGHT
(unloaded):
29" w. x 80.5" h. x 19.5" d.
900 lbs.
41" w. x 91%" h. x 25" d.
OVERALL DIMENSIONS:
50Y2" wide x 61" high x28" deep
1,800 lbs.
FLOOR SPACE
NEEDED:
WORK SPACE
NEEDED
IN FRONT OF
MACHINE:
SIZE OF
CHAMBER:
SIZE OF
OPENING:
_
29" x 191/1"
(approx. 3.6 sq. ft.)
_
41" x25"
SIZE OF SAFETY DOOR:
(TOP OF HOPPER)
50Y2" x 28"
9 sq. ft.
13 sq. ft.
17 sq. ft.
30" w. x24" h. x163/4" d.
13" x 24"
36" w. x 24" h. x 20" d.
20" x 36"
FLOOR SPACE:
28" x 28"
INSERTION OPENING TO
HOPPER.
24" x 24"
TIME OF CYCLE:
METHOD OF
PACKAGING:
31 seconds (approx.)
--
Cardboard box, plastic
bag, wire or rope ties,
covered with plastic bag.
27 seconds (approx.)
27 seconds (approx.)
SLOPE ANGLE
40?
Cardboard box, plastic Cardboard box, plastic
bag, rope or wire ties, bag, rope or wire ties,
covered with plastic bag. covered with plasticbag.
WEIGHT OF
PACKAGE:
(normal bulk
refuse)
SIZE OF
PACKAGE:
PACKAGE:
DENSITY OF
PACKAGE:
50 to 125 lbs.
125 to 225 lbs.
200 to 350 lbs.
24" w. x 24" d. x 16" h.
5.2 cu. ft.
4913 lbs. per Cu. yd.
based 00 100 lbs.
30" w. x 24" h. x 16%4" d.
36" w. x 24" h. x 20" d.
7.0 cu. ft.
10.0 cu. ft.
675 lbs. per cu. yd.
based on 175 lbs.
810 lbs. per cu. yd.
based on 300 lbs.
COMPRESSION
RATIO:
Adjustable up to 20:1
dependinf upon
type refuse
Adjustable up to 20:1
depending upon type
refuse.
Adjustable up to 20:1
depending upon type
refuse.
METHOD OF MACHINE
OPERATION:
Automatic operation by me-
chanical sensors which start
the compression return cycle
when trash is detected. Ma-
chine can automatically signal,
visually or audibly, and shut
down when full.
Manual operation (semi-auto-
matic) of compression return
cycle by push-button controls.
NOISE:
Sound-deadening construction
on the hopper loader reduces
noise entering the chute.
TOTAL
PRESSURE:
PRESSURE:
3 tons (6,000 lbs.)
ELECTRICAL:
1200 psi line
115 V 1-phase
Model 101D Manual
Model 1050 Automatic
SAFETY:
Model 1010
?two-hand control
Model 1050
?door lockout
5 tons (10,600 lbs.)
1500 PSI line
208-220-440V-3 phase
3 HP
Model 201?manual
Model 205?automatic
9 tons (18,800 lbs.)
1500 PSI line
SAFETY FEATURES:
Automatic chute shut-off on
trash overload or fire.
Fire and overload warning sig-
nals.
Built-in sprinkler head.
Loading door interlock.
Model 301?manual
Model 305?automatic
Model 201
?two-hand control
Model 205
?door lockout
Model 301
?two-hand control
Model 305
?door lockout
ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS;
Compatible with Series
100/2001300 compactors.
SPACE REQUIREMENTS:
Height of trash room-8 ft.
minimum; Width of trash room
?PA minimum; Length of
trash room-9 ft. minimum.
G.S.A. Contract 00,10c20 N
Approved by N.Y.C. Department of Sanitation
E:
*Patented. Manufactured under Pat. #3424078 and other '11!?E. Patents Pending
Approved For Release 203/01I29 :-GIA-RDP80-00706A00010003
A
Install a UNION-PAK n t e ca e er a 0 an e
refuse generated there. In other areas, a UNION-PAK can
handle all the refuse a school develops.
a I a UNION-PAK anyw er
trash accumulates. Install units on every floor or in a central
trash room.
There's a right UNION-PAK
model for every restaurant from
-the fast food hamburger spot to
the114st rastaurant or club.
UNION-PAK sales counselors
can help specify the right model
with the right accessories to
solve any restaurant's waste and
refuse problems.
nstall a UNION :P ? om
Waste room, and connect it to an existing incinerator
,
chute. .
Place UNION-PAK units In the utility room for tenant'
Operation.
Wherever you plate a UNION-PAK you'll have a
neatipr trash area and substantial labor savings in
handling'Watte and refuse. UNION offers a free
standing compactor shelter suitable for external use
In garden aOsirtMent complexes and other similar
applications.
AK COMPACTORS
-WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
i
Strategically positioned at riurs---
ing stations, refuse or linen
areaS Unlon-Pak not only as-
sists in reducing internal labor
assdiciated with waste move-
ment, but aids in curbing germ
emissions throughout the hos-
pital.
There's even a UNION mobile
unit for use ln schools and
office buildings.
?producing a refuse package
Of 76 . weight,
TOsuit-
able raal1 outlets, drive-
ins,aPattnimit s, hospitals, etc.
?pro. ucint Erref use pa age
of 175 lbs. nominal weight,
suitable for apartment houses,
industrial plants, larger res-
taurants, schools, retail out-
diEglielaelease 2003/01/29
pro. ? c ng a
of 275 lbs. nominal weight,
suitable for supermarkets,
large retail outlets, hotels,
high-rise apartments, office
Qikti/HaPaQINOWOOLOD010
_71
I 4
-
of 60 lbs. nominal weight, suit-
able for "Fast Food" stores,
drive-Ins, hospitals, schools or
wherever compactor mobility
cinema
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-103: dated 28 August 1975
Shop Foreman Assistant
Directorate of Administration/OL
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Former Method
Agency employees seeking the issuance of
driver's licenses to operate Government vehicles or
to sign out U-Drive-It vehicles walked to and from
the new Headquarters Garage in all kinds of weather.
2. Suggestion
Provide Agency bus service to and from the new
Headquarters Garage, particularly during inclement weather.
Individuals could be informed of the new service by the
Motor Pool Dispatcher at the time specific requests were
made. After the opening of the new Garage, consideration
was being given to parking U-Drive-It vehicles near the
Headquarters Bulking during the day for the convenience
of customers. This, of course, would interfere with the
problems of administrative control and maintenance.
B. Evaluations
Dispatcher
1. Upon relocation of the Motor Pool Room from
G B 1915, Headquarters to the new Garage, it was apparent
that the U-Drive-It vehicles would present some difficult
administrative problems. U-Drive-It customers, which daily
varied from 10 to 20 and used 14 vehicles, would obtain
the keys from the Dispatcher and find the car in the
South Loading Dock parking area. This had been the
practice since 1961. With the move to the Garage,
there were naturally requests from many customers to have
the vehicles remain at South Loading Dock. This was
undesirable for the following reasons:
a. The Office of Security demanded reduction
in vehicle congestion and stipulated that the vehicles
be parked at the Headquarters Garage at night.
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
b. Monitoring of the keys and attendant record
keeping would have to be taken over by some other unit
in Headquarters Building.
c. Delivery of the vehicles each morning
and reparking at night at the Headquarters Garage would be
very time consuming.
d. The daily maintenance, cleaning and
refueling of vehicles would be very difficult to
accomplish.
2. At this point it was decided by Logistics
Management tnat the U-Drive-It cars would be kept at
the Headquarters Garage, and that the mechanics or spare
drivers would shuttle the customers between the Garage
and the Headquarters Building. At the same time, but to
a lesser degree, were requests for transportation between
the tunnel entrance at Headquarters Building and the
Garage. Most of these customers needed Agency Driver's
permits.
3. This suggestion relieved the pressure to
establish a sub-pool at the South Loading Dock or any
area adjacent to the Headquarters Building. This was the
suggestion's greatest value. It is obvious that it saves
gasoline, wear and tear, and employees time, but this is
hard to accurately calculate. OL rated benefits
MODERATE/LIMITED. However, the committee's staff
believes the case merits MODERATE/EXTENDED intangible
benefits because it saves time for Motor Pool employees,
enhances vehicle control, saves a limited amount of gasoline
and relieved OL management of pressure to establish a
sub-pool of U-Drive-It vehicles. Such a pool would
require an estimated 520 gallons of gasoline and 520 man-
hours of time annually. However, awards credit for such
possible man-hours and gasoline savings is not believed
appropriate. The sub-pool alternative never began
operation because this suggestion solved the problem.
C. Recommendation of the Executive Secretary
l. Not line of duty.
2. $75 award (MODERATE/EXTENDED).
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
D. Decision of the Chairman
and
airman,
Achievement Awar1.s
Committee
31 76', 00
Award
-3-
zo jot/ 7S-
Date
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
25X1A
a?
Approved For Release 2003/1 00030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-119: dated 26 September 1974
II, GS-06
. .
Secretary
Directorate of Operations/EA
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
When using transmittal manifest self-reproducing
form package (1236a) the date was typed on the bottom
left of the form. Due to the form design, the date did
not appear on the first two (2) copies (sample attached).
There was also duplication of the classification and
classified by number.
2. Suggestion
Redesign Form 1236a so the date, classification
and classified by number will not have to be typed more
than once and appear on all copies of the form. Having
the date on all copies will aid in locating under separate
cover attachments.
B. Evaluation
1. Form 1236a was revised in March 1975 (attached).
ISG/DIM said that in accordance with instructions for
preparation of dispatches, the legend "CL BY
is to appear on headquarters copies only. Therefore,
in redesigning the form, the "CL BY" legend was printed
on copy number three which is the retention or head-
quarters copy. The instructions also specify that
transmittal manifests prepared in the field have the
date pouched entered at the upper right. Thus the date
now appears in tne upper right of the form, as the
result of this suggestion.
:?.11,!NFIDEN1IAL
IApproved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A0 0100030001-2
25X1
25X1A
Approved For ReleaseAzo4/eqw:lulPe-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
2. Agency Forms Management officials said that
11,000 sets of Form 1236a are used per month or
132,000 annually. They believe that little time will
be saved by components. Many were not adding the
"Classified By" number to the Parts 1 and 2, and the
classification was already going through to all parts.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $25 award (MODERATE/LIMITED).
D. Decision of the Chairman
Chairman, bugges L.LL)11 .0914 d Achievement
Awards Committee
#7Z.0
Award
Atts
2
Afov
Date
kilifig&NTIAL
Approved For Release 2003 : -RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A0001110030P-
.0. 1 2
AU I IU-15lank form requires
(CLASSIFY W APPROPRIATE WHEN FILLED IN)
TRANSMITTAL MANIFEST
DATE
TO
FROM
N2 7 0 3 0 2
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
.-
" I236a
_USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS
3-75
(13.47i
IIIIIIH
(CLASSIFY IF APPROPRIATE WHEN FILLED IN)
DATE
Annnwpri For Paloaca 9nnlinilla ? r.IA
SIGNATURE OF RELEASING OFFICER
ortrion rir....... A_??????es.? 1
FORM 0qAn I
3.75 I LA.,,,,C1 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS
CLASSIFIED BY:
(13-47)
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-127: dated 2 October 1974
rnotograpny uen.
Directorate of Administration/OL
A. Summary of Suggestion
Install water conservation kits on all OL/PUD
film processing equipment. The kit decreases the
water flow from 4 1/2 gallons to 1 gallon a minute when
the equipment is in the standby position. The equipment
in PUT is often in the standby position 5 to 6 hours
per day.
B. Evaluations
1. OL/PUD said that while on external training
to Eastman Kodak in Rochester, New York, the suggester
observed that their equipment was outfitted with
y available water conservation devices.
subsequently suggested that PUD outfit
eir equipment with water conservation devices.
OL/PUD Maintenance Shop concurrently initiated design
for the installation of units to conserve both water
and electricity for selected equipment. Although the
kits have been commercially available for some time,
the energy crisis and resulting rising costs has now
led to consideration of these kits to offset high
utility costs. It is impossible to determine if the
maintenance shop was influenced by the manufacturer's
advertisements, their independent observations, the
aggressive federal conservation campaign or the
suggestion itself. There is probably no mutually
acceptable way of computing savings. However, we
are conserving a limited resource.
2. OL has installed the kit on ten (10)
processors at a nominal cost. If energy costs, con-
tinue to rise, the significance of the change can be
quite meaningful. OL recommended a $100 advisory
award.
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
3. Both NPIC and OTS commented that there was
no application of the suggestion in their area.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $100 award (SUBSTANTIAL/LIMITED).
D. Decision of the Chairman
Chairman, ugg
Awards Committee
.41
iN/a.., 7s?
chievement Date
Award
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
IM
NO
'NNW
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
ADMINISTRATIVE
INTERNAL USE ONLY
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-193: dated 4 November 1974
GS-11
STATINTL
Finance Officer
Directorate of Science and
Technology/NPIC
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
a. NPIC had the following separate equipment
rental contracts: nine (9) with IBM for 17 MTST and
MCST typewriters; and six (6) with Xerox Corporation
for six (6) copying machines. Since each contract
had to be obligated separately, a total of 15 entries
which were made monthly on the "Obligation Abstract
Form" to the Office of Finance. OF in turn made the
same number of corresponding entries to the monthly
"Obligation Status Report".
b. Office of the Deputy Director for Science
and Technology required a separate Contract Menu
Sheets for each contract for the purpose of entering
certain detailed information into STEPS. Therefore,
15 Contract Menu Sheets were prepared and updated as
Contract changes occurred, and 15 separate line items
appeared on the STEPS printout.
2. Suggestion
Since all the equipment is budgeted for and
obligated under one Fan Account, NPIC/Logistics
Branch requested that Office of Logistics/Procurement
Division consolidate all the MTST and MCST type-
writers under one contract with IBM and all Xerox
machines under one contract with Xerox Corporation.
Thus, the number of existing contracts would be
reduced from 15 to 2.
, ,IST13.ATIVE
USE ONL1
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003491MT:s9Aff80-00706A000100030001-2
:qTrNAL USE OV-LY
B. Evaluations
1. NPIC said that prior to this suggestion,
33 separate contracts were written and maintained
on 33 separate items of equipment. This was the
result of monies being sequestered in separate
FAN accounts. As a result of consolidation of
funds for rentals of items of common equipment
in NPIC/Support Staff, it became possible to
consolidate the contracts. This suggestion was the
decisive factor in this action, and resulted in
the combination of 33 contracts into 12 for FY 1976.
In future years, it may be possible to consolidate
these 12 contracts into 4.
2. Prior to initiation of this suggestion,
approximately 24 hours per month was spent servicing
and posting the 33 contracts. As a result of the
consolidation, 16 hours are spent to service and post
the 12 contracts or a savings of 8 hours per month.
This results in an annual savings of 96 hours x $9.38
(GS-11/7) per hour = $900.48. NPIC rated intangible
benefits MODERATE/LIMITED for the reduced use of
machine records and computers, fewer papers, and
easier access and reference to information.
3. OL/Procurement Division stated that they
have attempted for some time to consolidate as
many requirements as possible into as few contracts
as practicable.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
STATI NTL
1. Not line of duty. The consolidation of
contracts is not 1 Iresponsibility. The
contracts are initiated by Logistics Branch and
Finance Branch is merely responsible for ensuring
that money is available, payment is authorized,
and that proper financial procedures are followed
in obligating funds.
2. $125 award based on $900 annual savings ($90),
plus MODERATE/LIMITED intangible benefits ($35).
2
iDMINISTRATIVE
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
STATINTL
Approved For Release 20031.0112A-;;-PlATKW80-00706A000100030001-2
TaTJONAL USE ONLY
D. Decision of the Chairman
x.0 Aiikqs-
Chairman, Suggestiorzynd Achievement Date
Awards Committee
Award
3
Approved For Release 2003101/29 : CIA-RM0-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-266:
dated 17 January 1975
GS-07
Freight Traffic Assistant
Directorate of Administration/OL
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
The stamps affixed to pieces of parcel post
at I VFreight Traffic Branch had to be
reinked each time they were used.
STATI NTL
B.
STATI NTL
STATI NTL
2. Suggestion
Use a preinked stamp to affix "AIR MAIL",
"REGISTERED" and "MOM" (Military Official Mail) to
parcels. The preinked stamp would be less messy
to use and would speed up the stamp application.
STATI NTL
Evaluations
1. 1/Freight Traffic Branch
processes 14,600 pieces of parcel post annually. The
use of the preinked "MOM", "REGISTERED" and "AIR MAIL"
stamps reduces the time required to stamp packages
by one-half. Each parcel is stamped four (4) times,
taking 30 seconds under the former method and 15 seconds
under the present method or a savings of 60 hours
annually. Annual savings are:
60 hours annually x $6.02 per
hour (GS-7/5) = $361.12 - S20
(cost of 3 stamps) = $341.12
annual savings
LIMIIED.
/FTB rated intangible benefits MODERATE/
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
2. Chief, Mail and Courier Branch/OL has
purchased 5 preinked stamps for their use. M&CB
processes an average of 75 pieces of mail per day
or 19,500 pieces annually. It is estimated that
65 hours will be saved annually @ $4.29 per hour
(GS-05) or $278.85 annually less $22.50 for 5
stamps = $256.35 annual savings. Formerly, an open
stamp pad was the source of ink stains on desk tops
and other furnishings. M&CB rated intangible benefits
mai MODERATE/LIMITED.
3. OS/Special Facilities Unit is considering
adoption of this suggestion. However, they are not
sure at this time whether the savings would offset
the cost of the stamps.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $110 award based on annual savings of
$597 ($60), plus MODERATE/LIMITED ($50) intangible
benefits.
3. Check with OS/Special Facilities Unit in
6 months to determine if the suggestion has been
adopted and what additional recognition is due the
suggester.
D. Decision of the Chairman
STATI NTL
Chairman, Suggestion Achievement Date
Awards Committee
1//c.41?.
Award
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
owl
int
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
ADMINISTRATIVE
INTERNAL USE ONLY
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-348: dated 3 March 1975
STATINTL GS-6
WM
tml
Security Equipment Tech
Directorate of Administration/OS
A. Summary of Su gestion
Issue an employee bulletin to remind employees
that push button door locks are not approved to
secure classified material in a work area when left
unattended for a short time.
B. Evaluation
1. OS issued a Headquarters Notice
on 15 August 1975, copy attached, to clear up any
confusion that exists as to the purpose of the push
button locks. The notice should serve as a deterent
to inadvertent exposure of classified material.
2. Intangible benefits rate MODERATE/EXTENDED
as tide reminder applies to the entire Headquarters
area.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $50 award (MODERATE/EXTENDED)
IDAINISTRATIVE
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
STATI NTL
Approved For Release 2003/01128 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
1141:11,11E:n1A.1i.vE
IITERITAI USE ONLY
D. Decision of the Chairman
STATI NTL
Att
Chairman, buggehLiult
Awards Committee
chievement
Award
Approved For Releas
-
4
2
AvIl'aiiY
WAAL CiikaDp80-oo7o6A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
)040,4IN I STRAT IVE - INTERNAL US4.1,0')NLY
This Notice Expires 1 September 1976
SECURITY
USE OF PUSHBUTTON DOOR LOCKS
15 August 19/S
Employees are reminded that pushbutton door locks are
not approved to secure classified material in an unattended
area even for a brief period of time. Pushbutton door locks
are operated by pushing a series of buttons in a preset se-
quence. They serve as a convenience to allow authorized
personnel access to an area without requiring someone already
in the area to open the door.
FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE:
JOHN N. MCMAHON
Acting Deputy Director
for
Administration
DISTRIBUTION: ALL EMPLOYEES (1-6)
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
STATI NTL
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-418: dated 29 April 1975
Production Lontrol bpecialist
Automation
Directorate of Science and
Technology/NPIC
A. Summary of Suggestion
Coffee was made by the secretary or other employees
of NPIC's Human Resources Branch to accommodate visitors
using the NPIC Auditorium. This task was usually per-
formed about four times weekly and involved the handling
of money and purchase of coffee, sugar, cream and cups.
The suggester recommended that a coffee vending machine
be installPd (111 thP Rilctli floor alongside the north
corridor I This would enable employees of
the Human Resources Branch to perform their regular
duties on schedule.
B. Evaluations
1. The NPIC Suggestion Panel reported that:
a. NPIC sponsors or provides meeting areas for
numerous classes, committees, working groups and seminars
attended by Intelligence Community personnel. A large
number of these groups meet in the NPIC Auditorium which
is controlled by the Human Resources Branch.
b. Adoption of the employee's basic suggestion
for a vending machine had logistical and security aspects
such as: the proposed sixth floor location would require
an extensive, expensive plumbing run to accommodate such
a macnine to include the necesary power; such machines
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
RYA
_44
STAT
Approved For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
require constant care and maintenance if they are to
be kept in a sanitary and operational mode; the man-
power to maintain the area in an acceptable manner would
have to come from in-house personnel.
C. In lieu of a vending machine, the NPIC
Support Staff acquired new self-service coffee making
equipment which makes as much as 50 cups of coffee at
one time. NPIC Support Staff authorized the purchase
of coffee supplies from the Wilkins Company and a
schedule for new supplies was set up and paid for out
of petty cash in order to accommodate visitors from
the Intelligence Community. This suggestion triggered
the above action, and the NPIC Panel recommended a $50
award based upon MODERATE/LIMITED benefits. However,
the Committee's staff ascertained that the new system
has resulted in more effective use of secretarial
personnel. The former system took time by secretarial
personnel about four times weekly at a daily savings
of about 45 minutes or 3 hours weekly and apt,roximately
150 annually at $4.78 hourly (GS-06 rate) which realizes
an annual cost avoidance of $717. About 250 Intelligence
Community visitors weekly use this convenience. It is
just out of the question to use the NPIC Cafeteria on
the 1st floor for coffee needs by visitors using the
6th floor auditorium. The time and distances will not
allow for it as well a.s the escort problem
2. Normally, this type of case would not be
processed through the Suggestion System because it
involves services and benefits to employees such as
vending machines. Yet this case corrected a practice
that was causing expenditure of employee official work
time valued at over $700 annually. Therefore, the
Committee's staff believes that the initial $50 award
recommendation by NPIC is approi5riate.
C. Recommendation by Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $50 award (MODERATE/LIMITED).
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Sla'AT
D.
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
of the Chairman
Decision
Chairman, bUggu
Awards Committee
,cte
Award
Waievement
3
Dat
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 75-471: dated 10 June 1975
intorex Lead Uperator
Directorate of Operations/ISG
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
Data is keyed into machinable language using
the Inforex 1302 key to disk system in DDO/ISG. Verified
data is transferred to two (2) magnetic tapes (original
and backup). The data is then deleted from the Inforex
1302 disk and the original magnetic tape sent to OJCS
for computer set up and processing. After processing,
the original is degaussed by OJCS and returned to data
conversion as a scratched tape. The backup tape is
kept for 30 days, then degaussed by OJCS.
2. Suggestion
Rather than send two (2) magnetic tapes to
OJCS, send only one (1) tape. The tape should not
be degaussed after processing by OJCS, but rather
returned to data conversion for 30 day storage as a
backup tape. To insure against tape failure during
processing, the data on the Inforex disk not be
deleted until the tape is returned from processing
and the data verified. (Attachment 1 illustrates the
previous processing procedure; Attachment 2 is the
suggester's recommended system.)
B. Evaluation
1. ISG implemented the suggestion in June 1975.
Prior to this suggestion two (2) tapes were used;
however, now only one (1) tape is needed. There are
no tape savings because just prior to receipt of this
suggestion a supply of tapes was purchased. The
suggestion as adopted, saves approximately 5 minutes
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
time daily of a GS-5/2 ($4.43 per hour) or approximately
awl 20 hours annually for savings of $88.60. Intangible
benefits are very slight.
2. ISG commented that this suggestion is
representative of a succession of attributes displayed
by this individual which directly influenced the recent
decision to award her with a Quality Step Increase.
ad
STAT
me
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. Certificate of Appreciation.
D. Decision of the Chairman
Chairman, Suggestion ai Achievement ilc;?Dit5e?
Awards Committee
Atts
11/4/0t., 7.5- evt, 16/ 6440?'
Awa d
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Chart ID: Chart Name: t Program Name:
ptpe-divFor Release 2003/01/29: CIA-R11030-0W06A000100030001-2
Ti
-
-c;-
-
r
4
OJCS/ISPB
DEGAUSSE
IS/AS/D
OJCS/ISPB
DEGAUSSE
_
DELETE
DATA SET
FROM
DISK
Is/AS/Q
7!. ?
OJCS/ISPB
PROCESS
?
is/ASID
?
G 4 ?
Approved For Release 2003/01/29: CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
"
c5 ?
r-6
-
Fold under at dotted line.
IV
Program Name:
Chart ID: rLart Name:
r vett:, Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RWO-0006A000100030001-2
ATT 2
IS/AS/D
1
4
_
_ _4_
-
r-F- 1? -
1 OJCS/ISPB
PROCESS
-
r?G3-
i.
- - -
DELETE
DATA SET
FROM
DISK
C4
4
L
a
L? -
-
_
OJCS/ISPB
DEGAUSSE
TAPE CS)
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-R0P80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 76-21:
datpd 11 .Tilly 197C
Library Assistant
Directorate of Intelligence/CRS
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
Form 3180, Film Processing Record, (TAB A)
is used to process and control film and videotape
accessioned by CRS/Pictorial Services Branch. Much
of the information requested on the form is no longer
required by PSB.
2. Suggestion
Revise Form 3180 (TAB B) to delete unneeded
sections and include additional space for the return
address, language, and film length.
B. Evaluation
1. CRS revised From 3180 as proposed, in July
1975 (TAB C). All relevant information contained on
the form was updated, standardized and consolidated on
a form half the size of the previous form. As a result,
it is estimated that fifteen minutes per day at the
GS-07/1 level is being saved in the preparation, processing,
filing and retrieval of the revised form. Form 3180
currently controls over 29,000 films and videotapes.
2. In addition, the form requires less filing space
and will be easier to microfilm as a permanent record
of processing activity. Approximately 2,000 forms are
added to tne system annually. Tangible savings are as
follows:
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
65 man-hours annually
(GS-7/1) $5.31 per
hour $345.15
Printing and material
cost savings 60.00
Total Annual Savings $405.15
3. CRS said that the revised form is considered
to be an important improvement to internal PSB pro-
cessing activities; it is used or handled by five or
six persons during the course of accessioning newly
acquired motion picture films or videotapes. CRS
rated intangible benefits SUBSTANTIAL/LIMITED.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $140 award based on annual savings of $405
($45), plus SUBSTANTIAL/LIMITED intangible benefits
($95).
D. Decision of the Chairman
Atts
Chairma ,
Awards Committee
24,r isic;il7S?
hievement Date
Award
2
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
CONFIDENTIAL
(When Filled In)
Approved Pi* Re[erly ?imam G 411ifteltr80-00,110tA000100030001-2
'
AY MO.
1 1
YR.
1
LOT
ITEM
OF
REQUEST CODE
REQUEST NUMBER
ITEM
SERV.OFF.CLASS.
FILM NUMBER
PRINT
'-ITLE
CONTROLS
,OR? T ?
S" 4C # *AAA"' itit # 11E0
R A t
PRODUCER
DISTRIBUTOR
NT ACT
A T TA C k m Eor
14
. OUR
r
DAY
MO.
YR.
SOURCE NUMBER
BY
DAY
MO.
WITH
COURIER
MAIL
PK.UP
DAY MO.
EMARKSr _ 9110k ' i
10
44 _____
* 40 0 1 I 14. 4t&I I k OA Li C 441 A e EA& At
ri. Xl"
4
1 I PA I kilk A I I i . A I WAY 1 VA 1 WillWr A IL" F '
,,,,,MO.
REQUESTS
' THIS'ACTION AT ON RETURN OUT IN
tUR-14
RECEIVED
CODE
NUMBER
SHOW SEND
PX-UP HOUR DAY DAY MO. DAY
MO DAY MO
_
? Y
RETURN
ilir,
10
/ 1 A
ig
**A
D
/\
A .4,464111k1
27 y 1 Ka eil
Al III,
Orl koNdk
VS 1 11
11111.11AVA 1644
Noit&N ipt
k 1 I I IMP 1 So4 1 PA
ii
k A Aihma 4
vrippw),
Aillikk
A, llibV .
ititi,
nuIME
: T
r
CONDITION
wv
Mito V 111111k
Ilk 1161.
Et
lialidUA, /
SIZE
REELS
CASES
CORES
OTHER
/
r
10 rol,A
'am.
. ,\
4110,
A.
I6mm.
r
MEN MA)N ilk Ver
\------
4 11
4
\ ,X.
i_
. \
. \'..,
1.1
lir
'
\ \
4
\
' i r e A63,I
1 Fi
Vi
FORM 3180 usE PacVious CONFIDENTIAL
(p5)
1
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
%we
lame
Fit. v CoTAPC., PRoc-E SS.IN6- Recoil
PAY
-
M110. , Wt.
LOT
ITEM
vi;
I1111110-e
he QueST cc4e/gequzi.r tot.+.
(
5eive. okV,
Flt.M is*.
PnA
C. LAS$ I F IcATIGK,
.
'ilie
it
pAY
A.,
1 i
v..
Sc..,..elCc. NO,
OY
0ii-r--
I
no.
ve,rtt
cootork
PlAit.
Pre-wr
PAY
MD.
lwre?racup,oecr
(.4>NTACT
MI I
I
i
! A T TA CHMEKY1- e)
,
RETUall To
. ,
MP.
Vtif?4945
r.o.AY
-leer
IY/?0
1
RErup.44
OM
I
.
p,Dirsoo
t-A#4 on cC
rnm
co
OW
ytivre
pCe.r
itf ELS,
(.APS
C.A5.ES
ortif R.
-.....,
REGru es.-ra.
DFFice
gEQues.-r 14o.
n,...oror.36 ()Are
DATE SENT
Ottr E DUE
PCTO?4,1
i
izrvi
re
3 IS eorrtop,
CeOFIOEN1-111
wi-krin) PILLED ta)
ces:2
owl
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Approved Foil&lease 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-0070%?00010003 001-2
-
FILM/VIDEOTAPE PROCESSING RECORD
CONFIDENTIAL(When Filled In
DAY
MO.
,
Y.
LOT
ITEM
OF
REQUEST CODE/REQUEST NO.
SERV.OFF.
FILM NO.
PN
CLASSIFICATION & CONTROLS
TLE
I
)UR
DAY
MO.
YR.
SOURCE NO.
RY
DAY
MO.
RITA
COURI
MAIL
PK-UP
DAY
MO.
DATE RETURNED
:00/DIST
CONTACT
RETURN TO:
AY MO
REMARKS
RECEIVED
RETURN
-ONDITION
LANGUAGE
MM
CS
SW
TIME
FEET
REELS
CANS
CASES
OTHER
REQUESTOR
OFFICE
REQUEST NO.
BOOKING DATE
DATE SENT
DATE DUE
RETURN
75 3180 ji:T'rr(NrOus
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
25X
*ore
mil
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
CHFIDENTiAL
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION NO. 76-31: dated 22 July 1975
GS-08
Logistics Field Support Officer
Directorate of Science and
Technology/OTS
A. Summary of Suggestion
1. Background
The suggester noted that surreptitious-entry
could be gained to South Building by lifting the metal
grate on the northeast corner of the building and
dropping into the pit adjacent to the mechanical room
window. The walls of the pit would provide protective
cover while the individual crawled through the easily
accessible window into the building basement.
2. Suggestion
Install a grating on the window of the north-
east basement corner of South Building with a padlock
to prevent entry.
B. Evaluations
1. Chief, Physical Security Division/OS said the
suggester's observation was valuable. The work was
completed in late July 1975. The suggestion has
intangible benefit by improving the security posture of
the Agency. OS recommended an award of $50 to $100 based
upon the above discovery.
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
25X1A
25X1
Aloe
Approved For Release 2003/0
Ii6L0706A000100030001-2
2. Thereafter, Chairman, OTS Suggestion Panel,
in checking the completion of the above proposal, noted
another vulnerable area and had it corrected. The
OTS Chairman recommended a $150 award for the improvements
to the security of both South and East Buildings. (The
basement area of each building is connected by a tunnel
which is open on a 24-hour daily basis).
3. OTS Security Officer commented that the
suggester's recommendation was of significant importance.
He rated it as an excellent "find" relative to the
vulnerability of their building security. The OTS
Security Officer recommended a $100 award for the
suggester's alertness and initiative. The DD/SU
Suggestion and Achievement Awards Committee Member
Concurred.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $125 award (SUBSTANTIAL/EXTENDED).
Ape D. Decision of the Chairman
25X1A
Chairmaj7?giTion a J Achievement
Awards Committee
Award
2
Date
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
STAT Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/01/29 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000100030001-2