(UNTITLED)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80R01441R000100020027-3
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 16, 2005
• Sequence Number: 27
• Publication Date: May 15, 1957
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2005/07/01 : CIA-RDP80R01441R000100020027-3
HE LEFT UNCHALLENGED, HOWEVER, A STATEMENT BY SECRETARY DULLES
-ESTERD AY THAT THE AL ASKAN-SIBERI AN-NORTHERN CANADIAN AREA MIGHT B
PEST PLACE TO SET UP A TRIAL OF AN AERIAL INSPECTION SYSTEM TO GUARD
AGAINST ANY SURPRISE ATTACK BY EAST OR, WEST.
INFORMED SOURCES SAID A DECISION FAVORING THIS NOTHERN AREA NAY BE
REACHED SOON.
5/15-P1118 A?
Approved For Release 2005/07/01 : CIA-RDP80R01441R000100020027-3
Nrc77 YaRK I 1.01E-5
/9.5 7
rife
? WASEON,0
lowing ;isthe t
record.. or. S
SECRET
will
ssess polic
s!stfisy14-2-0
Depaientent's mont4,.6
gilt of. Statetlat -pr*
jbv .t
'41icfqqaaVi.1
rs*:'
pod evi
Oomniun
are intro,
into the
Which d,
means s
COMpliai
agreeme
curnstan
roduc
re el.
Ves i
rea, r
ent
unceci
sh
L
adl
'United ,
is ma
riited
iRarciA. II
vised
refor
ey 1
iculE
S w
ohs
e r
gh
of
e wit
VC,
ron CtIrtain
Germany? ,
A.?The poll
States is not to
cedure along th
you indicates In
we do not accep
ment Svhtch
present partiCtO
And theft,Ste
some inisunders
theit se-called t
which, as sub
summit conferenc
volve any demitits,
all. It was a plan
cal inspection Of
ably would be mill
If the areas were/
I then your inspecti
rean in '
ch.
st.pl,ce,
r c-
up* s 6
Germanyt:
. -
n ng
r %spa
u
idncit
ed zoite at
r recipro-.
t presurns,
rizedAreasS'
cInots
e
Cleo on
Q.? /*tam psi
a jriy t? ..the Far
ts. poSsil) lity, Is? -roes
StateriAsilling to a,cceilt"
gella?
tie1llieRussi
for\ 'is part
exchat ' c ?,41asica ,
United 'S: tes West
Mississippi.? "
. =Well, I 'Woul
'
to tr.) to' define- liere what the,
?area ,,Would lie, because% A
. havnot yet had the vonsul'-'
talons- here in our owls -agsg,
erriment Which Would/144f to
an COnelusions a tir
? did say that. I,
the Ar9tle itrePI,
dense lY ,?'Po, pul,a.at 'et
the t areas: wipch
Viell,r' annPlieP- , ,
art osier place,
,.
ome for consultation?
A.?Well, I think that they
have reached a point there
where it may be appropriate
that he should come back
again. There have been plit
forward, I think, a total of fif-
teen different proposals; they
have gone through their
agenda; and I think thatit is
possible that a stage has been
reached to make it desirable
for Governor Stassen to come
back again. There has been
no final decision reached in
that respect, probably there
will not be for a day or two,
but that is one of the things
being thought about.
Q.?Mr. Secretary, just for
clarification, are you saying
that the reunification for Ger-
many is still a prime condition
for 'consideration of any secu-
rity arrangement in Europe?
A.?I said that we would
not deal with disarmament in
Europe in any way which could
bear upon the reunification of
Germany unless we were in
that respect working in close
cooperation with Chancellor
Adenauer and the Feaeral Re-
public.
Q.?Does that rule out that
pilot area for Central .Europe
that has been discussed as a
test for inspection and other
devices for security?
A.?Well, as I said in an-
swer to an earlier question, we
do not exclude the possibility
of having such a zone in ?Eur-
ope. If there is such a zone
?in Europe, it would have to be
worked out in cooperation with
S, NATO, With the Federal Re-
public. There are very con-
derable complications about
sikgems---
mind on-that from the Su-
preme,,Court ? A.?Yes. I will
do it through Mr, Beraing.
My legal adviser got this up
'several weeks ago. '
Q.?Mr. Secretary, does that
now, mean that yOu are wait-
ing for the newspaper frater-
'ity to come up with a proPosal
still for meeting this .question
of newsmen traveling into Red
China?
have indicated that it
possible that the news gath-
ding :community might be
able to devise a plan suffi-
ciently limited so that I would
feet that it could be accepted
consistenly -with our foreign
policy objectives. A. number of
suggestions have been made
more or less of an In4tyidual
character, along those, lines ,
which we are studying.
Whether or not they can be
reconciled with the foreign
policy objectives, and whether
or not they mould be accepted
by the neWs gathering frater-
nity as a whole are two ques-
tions which Are not yet an-
swered, but both of which are
being studied.
Looks to Courts on Passports
Qs-ssMr, Secretary, there has
been some worry expressed in
editorial and on thte part of
publishers that the position
you have take non a Constitu-
tional question you enunciated
In your letter to Mr. Sulz-
berger means in essence, since
you control passports, that the
American press can cover for-
eign news only on the suffer-
ance of the Secretary of State.
Is this a correct interpreta-
Ural ?
/ would say it is
our s endpoint. ,
Q.?Mr. Secretary, do you
consider it possible or desir-
able for a foreigner to cover
:news for American news
sources? I don't think
is as desirable, but in these
matters you have got to strike
a balance of conveniece.
Q.?Mr. Secretary, doesn't
your policy amount to using
newsmen as a weapon to force
? the Red Chinese to do what
we want them to do? A.?It is,
I think, a policy which is de-
signed to secure respect for
American citizens, American
lives, and the American pass-
port throughout the world.
Q.?To put it another way,
sir: Is it not true that your
policy amounts to making the
press, the American press, an
Instrument of American for-
eign policy? A.?No. Because
our policy applies not only to
the American press, but to all
Americans.
? Q.?Mr. Secretary, could I
ask you an ethical point on
this: Would it be correct to in-
fer from what you have said
that we would not be violating
the spirit of your regulations
if we were to employ a foreign
national to cover news in Cons-
munist China?
A.?That is quite right, be-
cause the United States Gov-
ernment has no responsibility
for the tvelfare and safety of
the national of another coun-
try. Our responsibility is to
protect Americans wherever
they go, and there is no Amer-
ican that can even waive that
right. That is a right which
inheres in the nation. ;And, it
Is not consistent, I think, with
net a, correct interpretation. the dignity and respect for
5/01011?CiA-- R61 otri
Awaits Arab Envoys
Q.?Mr. Secretary, as you
know, over the week-end there
was made public a rather dra-
matic appeal by Messall Hadj
[president of the Algerian Na-
tional Movement] to President
Eisenhower? to speak out
against French atrocities in
Algeria, and, as a group of
Arab envoys are coming to see
you here later in the week on
the same issue, do you think
there is anything we can do
about that situation?
A.?Well, I don't know that
there is. We are waiting to
see, of course, what these gen-
tlemen have to bring to us,
.and wouldn't want to antici-
pate the result of 'their visit.
Q.?Mr. SecretarY, Presi-
dent [Synghman] Rhee of
South Korea has indicated that
the United States has assured
him that modern weapons will
be sent to Korea. Could you
say if this means the United
States is considering altering
the armistice agreement with
the Chinese Communists or
the North Koreans?
A,?The armistice agreement
has to be interpreted, I think,
In realistic way. It was made
nearly five years ago, presum-
ably for a brief duration, and
called for a replacement of
weapons only on a piece-by-
piece basis of comparable
quality. Well, now in the pass-
age of? that five years much
of the stuff that was there is
no longer made, has become
obsolete. Therefore, it is not
practical to replace it exactly
on a like:for-like basis, and
there must be some elasticity
there. Furthermore, we have
2173'
Col
an"
Euro
apprehe
tmospl
ssve
rangem
the pr,
Many,"
Nlaid le
anythin,
indir
pros
We won]
sert wit
The 3
Support
Were re
chat. Ti
:11.9t to
thf
Slatted.
are sho
the atm
many, a
supporte
Wants
Might ac
laical di
This is
reports -b
O f the r
Will try
?crate d,
German
late
ii
uts
Y 0
r. Di
e
MIPS