SUMMARY-I BACKGROUND 1946-1950

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
42
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 6, 2006
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 23, 1957
Content Type: 
SUMMARY
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7.pdf1.2 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000}0010002-7 This doCunt ha$ been approved for release through the EISTOR=L REVIEW PROGMK of the Central Intelligence Agency. 6 / 2 -7 7 1 -2f--Z--Approved For Release 2006/12/06:: CIA-RDP83-01034RO 200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 S UM4IARY T Background 1946-1950 This study traces the organizational development of the Central Intelligence Agency, using as a chronological guide the period covered by the administration of General falter Bedell Smith (October 7, 1950 - February 26, 1953.) It is concerned only incidentally with the Agency's clandestine activities. When General Smith became Director Central Intelligence (as Group and Agency) was almost five years old. The principal developments during that time had been as follows: (1) The Central Intelligence Group (CI G) was established as coordinating agent for the Secretaries of State, 'Jar, and Navy plus a personal representative of the President designated as the National Intelligence Authority (NIA), by a presidential letter of January 22, 19L6. GIG was to consist of a Director a_pointed by the President, assisted by persons and financed by funds to be supplied by the NIA. The Director was to (a) advise the NIA concerning needed modifications HS/HC-Z2 3 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 in the existing intelligence structure of their departments; (b) "correlate and Evaluate intelligence", and (c) establish "services of common concern" wherever there were "related to the national security". Under this directive, the first director, Sidney d. Souers (January 22, 1946 - June 10, 1946) formed two staffs: one for coordination, and the other for correlation and evaluation of intelligence. On February 8, 1946, the NIA, at the request of the President, added to CIE's duties by requiring a daily summary of current intelligence. Since CI G was dependent on the NU for funds and personnel, there was no real staff for personnel and administration under Souers. General Hoyt S. Vandenberg (June 10, 1946 - May 1, 1947) proceeded on the assumption that, as the President's appointee, he must take full responsibility for his acts as Director; he therefore sought commensurate authority and was empowered by the NIA to (a) hire and pay his own personnel; (b) receive and disburse independent funds, and (c) act as the "executive agent" of NIA members in dealings with their departmental subordinates. He was also empowered. to' Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0002O 010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 collect foreign intelligence apart from the regular departmental collection services, and to do independent research in intelligence under certain limitations. To assist him in coordination of ` intelligence activities, Vandenberg established the Interdepartmental Coordinating and Planning Staff (ICA.PS) consisting of representatives from all PNIP. intelligence organizations plus a chairman appointed by the Department of State. To discharge his functions with respect to correlation and evaluation of intelligence related to the national security, Vandenberg built up a full scale research organization called the Office of Deports and Estimates (0itE), which took charge of national current intelligence, intelligence estimates, basic intelligence, and interagency coordination of all three, plus a variety of other services including production of scientific, technical, and economic intelligence. In view of the independent authority now vested in the jirector, staffs for personnel, administration, and security were formed under the itrector's 1'Executive". Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-010348000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter (May 1, 1947 - October 7, 1950) retained all authority acquired by General Vandenberg with the exception of his position as 'executive agent' which Hillenkoetter renounced on June 26, 1947. On July 26, 1947, the National Security Act made the Group an Agency (CIA) and substituted the National 5ecur.ty Council (NSC) for the National Intelligence Authority. Between the passage of the Act and January 13, 1948, National Security Council Intelligence Directives (NSCIDt"s) issued in pursuance of the new law, defined relationships and allocated responsibilities among CIA and other intelligence organizations but not in such a way as to necessitate important changes in the existing CIA organization. This organization, as of January 1, 1949, consisted of (1) The Director advised by the Intelligence Advisory Committee (established under NSCID-1); (2) certain advisory groups; and (3) six offices: Collection and irissemination 03D), Scientific Intelligence (OSI); -4- Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Reports and Estimates (ORE), Operations (00), Special Operations (050), and olicy Coordination (OPC). During iIillenkoetter's administration, difficulties arose with respect to all of the principal CIA functions; Surveys undertaken during 197-1950 resulted in numerous recommendations, many of which were still pending when General Smith took office on October 7, 1950. II Organizational Revisions 1950-1953 In spite of many internal.and external changes (an increase of major organizational components in Washington; new leadership in key positions; jurisdictional realignments among CIA's operating units; reallocations of budgetary assets and personnel; changes in operating programs, priorities and the like; and a variety of modifications affecting CIA's relationships with other intelligence organizations)A t e administration of General Smith was characterized by important elements of stability in that basic legislation underlying the Central Intelligence system did not change; and the system remained decentralized among seven intelligence and numerous non-intelligence -5- Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-010348000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 agencies of the government. The Smith administration was, nevertheless, motivated toward change when it took office, partly because of recommended changes already approved by the NSC and partly as a result of the Korean Jar. Organizational planning and advice were available to the new Director internally from: (1) the "Management Staff"; (2) the Coordination, Operations and Policy Staff (late ICAPS); (3) the Inspections and Security Staff; (4) the Budget Staff; (5) the Personnel Staff; (6) the Legal Staff; (7) the "Project Review Committee"; and externally from: (1) the Iti'berstadt" Committee's Report to the Hoover Commission (in 1948); (2) the "Dulles Committees" report to the National Security Council (1949); (3) the results of studies made by the State and Defense Departments in 1949 and 1950, and (4) studies promoted by the Bureau of the Budget. Of all these, the most important and compelling was the "Dulles Report", in that it was at the same time the most detailed, comprehensive, Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-010348000201010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-R DP - 034R000200010002-7 and objective, and a plan to whose implementation General Smith was committed. The principal changes indicated by the Lilles Report were as follows: (1) Creation of an "Estimates Division" to be small and carefully seleeted and to have charge of constructing "national" intelligence estimates in close cooperation with the other intelligence agencies. (2) Creation of a "Research and Reports .Division" to (a) produce whatever "departmental" intelligence CIA might need, (b) take charge of "basic" intelligence, (c) take charge of research in economic, scientific, and technological (including map) intelligence as well as any other type that might in the future be authorized as a "service of common concern", and (d) take over certain support services, chiefly the library, indexing, reference, and collation activities. k3) 1J merger of collection services and clandestine activities (OSO, 00, OPC) under a single Division, and with "covert" administration Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 compartmented from "overt" administration9 (Li) Creation of a "Coordination Division", as a staff to the hirector, concerned with interagency coordination, and to supervise the duties currently undertaken by the "Liaison Division" of OCD. Other important features of the wiles Report were: (1) Suggestions that CIA should relinquish activities in conflict with those of other agencies; (2) apecial criticism directed at ORE for having become a competitive producer of intelligence not properly classed as "national"; (3) Special criticism with respect to scientific intelligence; communications intelligence; and "domestic intelligence including counterintelligence and the points at which domestic and foreign intelligence overlappwd." Some but not all of the recommendations in the Tulles Report were adopted by the Smith Administration in complete or modified form. Another important influence on General Smith's planning for the Agency seems to have been a "Staff Study" issued jointly by the Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034ROOG300010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 State and Defense Departments on May 1, 1950. The plan here suggested would have involved a "'tional Intelligence Group" within CIA to produce both estimative and current intelligence (unlike the Dulles Report Plan in which current intelligence might well have been dropped from CIA activities). General Smith reorganized the Director's staff to include two members of the "Dulles Committee", Mr. William H. Jackson as Deputy Director of Central Intelligence and Mr. Allen Dulles h 'f as Deputy Director for Operations. The former took the lead in reorganizing the Agency and inter-agency apparatus for production of intelligence; while the latter took general charge of collection and clandestine operations. Smith also appointed a Deputy Director for Administration (i'Ir. Murray McConnel soon replaced by Mr. Walter R. Wolf) to supervise the administrative activities of the Agency minus the new office of Training which was given independent status. It was not until January 2, 1952, that the third deputy (for Intelligence) was added to superintend the work of the "overt" offices which eventually Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000220010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-O1034R000200010002-7 included national estimates, Current Intelligence, Research and Reports, Scientific Intelligence, Intelligence Coordination, Collection and Dissemination, and Operations. In the interim, Mr. Jackson took general charge of the overt components. While the Agency executive structure was being thus altered, Jackson and Smith gave immediate attention to the problem of re-asserting CIA's leadership in governmental intelligence. They proceeded conservatively, however, seeking to withdraw the Agency from fields where its "dominant interest" was not clear, rather than attempt to take on new functions. Jackson spent much of his time during his first weeks as Director in negotiating an agreement with the Department of State under which State nonce#ded a dominant interest in economic intelligence to CIA while CIA withdrew from the field of research in political intelligence . (Later, CIA also withdrew from certain fields of scientific and technological intelligence.) After the first interagency agreements were negotiated, Jackson made use of the Office of Intelligence Coordination (OIC) for study of interagency problems. - 10 - Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000J0010002-7 ApprQved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 General amith was quick to call upon the Intelligence Advisory Committee to aid him directly in problems of coordination of both activities and estimates. Luring the next two years, the IAG was convened almost one hundred times, occupying itself chiefly with detailed discussion of intelligence estimates prepared by all agencies under the leadership of CIA for presentation to the National Security Counfil. The IAC also reached agreement on a wide variety of inter- agency problems. Other coordinating boards which figured importantly during the Smith administration were; (1) the US Communications Intelligence Board of which the DCI became chairman in the fall of 1952; (2) the Operations Coordinating Board (formerly the Psychological Strategy Board) directly under the NSC, on which CIA was represented, the DCI acting for a time as chairman; (3) various primarily military intelligence coordinating committees in which CIA gained influence: the Joint Intelligence - 11 - Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0000010002-7 ? Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 STAT Indications Committee (which became the Watch Committee of the IAC); and the joint military organizations for exploitation of prisoners of war; enemy materials, and enemy documents. In the particular matter of inter-agency coordination overseas, General Smith gradually gained agreements in which the influence of STAT I The covert services continued to maintain their own arrangements for coordination abroad. Perhaps the most striking changes introduced into the intelligence system by the Smith administration were those related to the production of "national" intelligence as defined in NSCID-3. The following division of responsibilities was gradually evolved for production of intelligence in this category: (1) Estimates by the newly formed Office of National Intelligence which relied primarily upon the IAC organization for the material underlying these. Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034ROG 200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 (2) Basic Intelligence (the National Intelligence Survey) by a division under the Office of Research and Reports, acting as coordinating agent for research carried on by the 1.!C. (3) Current intelligence publications by the Office of Current intelligence (but national "indications" intelligence by an inter-agency group). This new division of responsibilities, which involved the abrupt abandonment of the Office of Reports and Estimates, was made necessary by the pressing international situation and the demands created by the National Security Council's endorsement of the Dalles Report. III The Inter-agency Coordination Problem It appeared essential to all CIA directors through General Smith to organize a personal staff for interdepartmental coordination of intelligence activities, to aid him in formation of decisions ultimately to be considered by the Intelligence Advisory Board (January 22, 191t6- July 26, 1947) and the Intelligence Advisory Committee (after December 12, 1947). - 13 - Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0002 ,0010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Admiral Souers organized such a staff (Central Planning Staff) which, during the four months of its existence (February - June 1946) conducted numerous studies of the points at which the existing intelligence organization of the government might be strengthened with reference to the national security. This staff was not primarily representative of the agencies from which the members came, but rather consisted of advisers responsible to the Y.I. General Vandenberg dissolved Souers' staff and organized an "Interdepartmental Coordinating and Planning Staff" (ICAPS) in its place. This consisted of representatives of all IAB members with a representative from the State Department as chairman. It was in part responsible to the DCI and in part to the IA.C chiefs. According to the functional description issued for ICAPS, it was to "ensure" cooperative activity by each agency as well as CIG. Admiral Hillenkoetter retained ICAPS after GIG had become CIA with much the same theoretical responsibilities as it had had before, adding to it a second staff celled the "Standing Committee". This - lL - Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-010348000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 committee differed from IC.P,PS primarily in terms of seniority. The ICi'S-Standing Committee system did not work well, primarily because the staffs lacked the confidence of the IAC. Admiral Hillenkoetter was not inclined to make regular use of the LAC itself in the process of coordination. In 1948 the Dulles Committee found the system for and results of coordination unsatisfactory on several counts. The Committee, however, emphasized what it considered to be failures in coordination of national intelligence estimates, for which the main responsibility in CIA lay in the Office of Reports and Estimates. According to the Dulles Group, rather than bring about the harmony of operation called for by the requirements of coordination, ORE had tended to create friction with respect to the type of material presented in intelligence reports and estimates; the manner of coordinating their substance; and in the field of intelligence research where ORE's activities impinged on the dominant interests of other departments. As to Hillenkoetter's immediate staff system for coordination of activities, the committee -15- Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0000010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 found it inadequate as constituted at the time of reporting. In place of ORE, the jteport proposed a small staff for estimating and a larger one for research and reports. In place of ICAPS, the Committee recommended a "Coordination Division" with somewhat broader responsibilities than those accorded to ICAPS. Although the National Security Council endorsed these recommendations, the only changes made in accordance with them up to ?ctober 7, 1950, entailed little more than a token internal reorganization of ORE, and a change in the name of I UPS to the Coordinating, Operations and Policy Staff (CORPS). The disposition made of the ORE problem by the Smith administration is outlined elsewhere in this study. COAPS remained in existence until December 1, 1950, when it was abolished in favor of the Office of Intelligence Coordination (OIC). (The "Standing Committee"" was retained until April 2, 1951 when it also was abolished.) No direct effort seems to have been made to establish a T1Coordination Division" in accordance with the Dulles Report specifications. - 16 - . Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R00(W00010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 CIC was established as a small staff, with Office status, to serve as an advisory, fact-finding, and management-consultant group on various kinds of inter-agency problems of an organizational, administrative, or procedural character. Though this staff was responsible to the Director, it worked primarily with the Deputy Director during its early development. On January 19, 1951, OIC was instructed to furnish a Secretary for IAC. In this capacity, the Assistant Drirectorfor Intelligence Coordination prepared studies and agendas for the IAC and was enabled to keep in touch with policies being formulated there. On this same date, the Assistant Director described OIC as an Office which (1) furnished aid where needed to other CIA offices, which, however, themselves carried on inter-agency ccordinationas it affected their own special fields; (2) assisted in making the IAC effective; (3) worked also with and through the regular meetings of the DCI..with his Assistant Directors; (14) developed an intimate knowlddge of the - 17 - ft: Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R00020010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 functions and activities of the IAC agencies as well as CIA; and (5) foresaw future problems in the course of planning in relation to coordination. The principal achievements of the Office of Intelligence Coordination to 1953 were described as: (1) Regularization of certain IAC practices and the IAC structure; (2) intelligence publications; (3) advice on and the negotiation of NSCID's and DCID's; resolution of jurisdictional problems among agencies regarding intelligence activities and stimulating cooperative action to meet urgent intelligence needs; (5) relation of services of common concern to the rest of the community and provision of uidance to those services; (6) support for DD/P and psychological warfare. After January 1952, OIL; was administratively responsible to the Office of the DDI but was not absorbed into that office during the Smith administration. Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034ROO J200010002-7 Approved-For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Iv The Conduct of Overt Collection The Office of Operations (00), an amalgamation of four organizations for collecting intelligence 1 from foreign broadcasts, foreign documents, domestic sources was originally formed as part of CI G on October 17, 19L46. The oldest of its constituent parts, the Foreign Broadcast Information Division came into being in 1940 and was transferred, as an entity, to CIJ on June 29, 1946. The next, the Foreign Documents Livision (FDD) originated as a military agency in 1944, and it was transferred to CIG on December 1, 1946. The third, the Contacts Division (00/C) originated within CI q for the Office of Gpecial Operations (OSO) in July 1946. It was transferred from OSO to 00 STAT STAT STAT TAT Th~"-f2rstMc?LC'ef- rr--#~ he?-~?-fic~--a~'~er~t'2t77is - 19 - STAT Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0002b0010002-7 ' Approved-For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 By NSCID-6 of December 12, 1947, CO's monitorin, activity was designated a "service of common concern" to "conduct all Federal monitoring of Foreign propaganda and press broadcasts required for the collection of intelligence information to meet the needs of all Departments and agencies in connection with the National Security". The work of 00/C received similar authorization by NSCID-7 o' February 1948. included were agreements with the FBI, which at first feared CIA interference with its domestic security responsibilities. STAT Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-010348000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 STAT The .Dulles Report corLnended the work of 00 in General but objected to its organization as a separate office. Instead, the Committee recommended that the Contact Division be made part of a proposed "operations Division" in which 030 and the Office of Policy Coordination should be the other two elements; that the Foreign Documents Division should be made part of the Committee's proposed Research and Reports Division; and that the Foreign Broadcast Information Division "should probably" be administered under the same. Admiral 1iillenkoetter rejected these proposals on the advice of the Assistant Director for 00. General Sr"ith at first seemed to agree with Admiral Hillenkoetter's position in that he told the NSC on October 12, 1550, that heopposed the OSO-OPC-00 merger. In November 1950, however, Smith changed his - 21 - Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0 200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 views to the extent of appointing Mr. Allen Dulles as Deputy Director for Operations (DDO), to superintend the work of 00, OPC, and OSO. This reversal of general Smith's views seems to have been motivated primarily by (1) r2) the need for coordination between overt STAT and covert collection problems; and (3) Mr. Dulles' special qualifications for collection work. In spite of this new dispensation for intelligence collection (published in chart form January 19, 1951) 00 remained intact as an office without important change in its functional assignments. Nevertheless, those in charge of the Office of Operations were not convinced of the wisdom of the merger. The 00 Assistant Director ,nade representations to the DCI and others to this effect during 1951 and 1952. The principal arguments against the merger were (1) STAT STAT STAT STAT Approved For Release 2006/12/06:: CIA-RDP83-01034R00.I 00010002-7 Approved For. Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 This proposal was adopted in February 1952, In spite of the above-described changes in 00's status, the Office continued to operato productively during 1950-1953 with STAT respect to all its various functions STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT Statistics for the period 1950-1953 show that: STAT (2) The Foreign Broadcast Information Division continued to represent a problem of both mass and quantity, as the Division increased its daily output, derived from monitoring an estimated oreign TIS/B _~C_ =1~3 STAT Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034ROO 200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 broadcasting stations. (3) The Foreign Documents Division continued to furnish a variety of translation, abstracting, and research services both for CIA and the IAC agencies. It also served as a coordination center to reduce duplication and confusion in the translation field. During the period it increased both its volume of service and the number of languages it could handle. - 25 - STAT Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R00Q 00010002-7 . Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 VI Problems of Scientific and Technical Intelligence The exceptional importance of establishing an efficient post-war apparatus to deal with scientific intelligence from the point of view of national security was recognized from 1946 on, but a long series of difficulties arose as attempts were made to deise an appropriate system. The first agreement of importance in this field established a Scientific Intelligence "Branch" within the Office of Reports and Estimates of CIG. This organization (which was severely criticized by the Dulles Committee on the basis of its 1948 survey) proved to be a failure for numerous reasons and was supplanted as of January 1, 1949, by an Office of Scientific Intelligence (OSI) in CIA. In September 1949, after the unexpected Soviet explosion of an atomic bomb, this Office complained that its mission was impossible of accomplishment under current circumstances. The principal reasons given were, first, that the Office of Special Operations did not furnish adequate scientific intelligence from the field; and second, that the Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R00(00010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 intelligence system under the IAC did not cooperate for scientific intelligence purposes. OSI proposed, in effect, that it be given a greater control Over OSO with respect to scientific intelligence and that the Director should assert complete authority over the IAC. Neither of these recommendations was carried out, but in the course of an ensuing controversy involving the Assistant :directors for Scientific Intelligence and Special Operations, the former resigned. As a result, a new Assistant Director for Scientific Intelligence took office seven months before the coming of the Smith administration under circumstances of some delicacy with respect to the internal organization of CIA. These special circumstances, along with general difficulties attending the 0:i7L-ONE-ORR reorganization in 1951, may have had a part in the tendency shown by the Smith administration at this time to concentrate on other problems than that of scientific intelligence. No attempt seems to have been made in 1950-1951 to transfer scientific and technical intelligence to ORR, as had been proposed by the Dulles Committee, or until 1952 to modify the arrangements Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000~O0010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 for inter-agency coordination that had been begun under the previous STAT Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 In origin it seems to have resulted from a compromise adopted by the IAC in preference to a. method of coordinating medical intelligence proposed by jecretary of Defense Forrestal in March 19249. Its principal mission was to produce coordinated estimates, for which purpose it relied on sub-committees specializing in various fields considered to be of scientific and technical importance. The Office of Scientific Intelligence itself, when General Smith became Director, was almost two years old but still largely in a formative stage of organization. Largely because it had been unable as yet to recruit a large enough and competent enough staff, its achievements to October 1950 had been limited. The Office had expressed dissatisfaction on numerous occasions with the quantity and quality of material collected by the field and made available to OSI. Under regulations promulgated by the amith Administration early in 1951, the emphasis with respect of 03I's functional responsibilities was STAT Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0002, 0010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 shifted in the direction of furnishing national scientific intelligence for use in estimates to be produced by ONE. At the end of fifteen months, the Scientific Intelligence Committee began to show signs of fundamental disagreement. This came to a head in April 1951 with a divided vote on a motion to abolish certain sub-committees considered to be engaged in work belonging exclusively to the military establishment. As a result of this and other disagreements, the matter of departmentl jurisdiction in various fields of scientific and technical intelligence came before the Intelligence Advisory Committee on August 2, 1951. No action was taken by the IAC at this ar'later meetings during 1951. The Scientific Intelligence Committee continued to function as usual, though its actions were under study by OIC. In Jaruary 1952, xna~ve , it was announced to the Committee that the Joint Intelligence Committee of the Joint Chiefs of Staff had established a technical subcommittee whose work would obviously duplicate that of the SIC. Closely following this new development came two new surveys of the scientific intelligence situation. Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R0002010002-7 Approved For Release 2006/12/06: CIA-RDP83-01034R000200010002-7 r-.a ?M .-? DCID 3/3 and the .IC were to be retained5 jt..i,