SPECIFIES ON RESEARCH AND ON SAFE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83M00914R000700070023-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 27, 2006
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 11, 1982
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83M00914R000700070023-7.pdf46.69 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2@b9i16 18 :U~fA-Wb 83M00914R000700070023-7 DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE Science and Technology Advisory Panel STAP-0011/82 11 June 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: Specifies on Research and on SAFE suffered are far ahead and OSO is using STAY technologies of the '50s 25x1 1. With respect to your questions on 8 June 1982, it appears to me that the research effort in OTS in the last few years has concentrated on to such a degree that other projects have had to be curtailed or drop pe n ORD the cause in large part has been budgetary pressures but the result is a loss of personnel and their expertise. Some areas that have 2. In re SAFE, if it felt that yet another review group is necessary, I recommend using available personnel who are already knowledgeable of the SAFE concept. The names STAP suggests are: and a user representative that would be in a position to do the SAFE job would include: Science Application, Inc. (SAI) Stanford Research Institutes (SRI) RAND Bolt, Baranek & Newman, Inc. (BB&N) Cambridge, MA (developers and operators of the ARPANET, the university and contractor network for DARPA; also developed security gateways for COINS) Xerox (would probably be their own hardware) Universities with strong expertise Vv Brown, and Dartmouth. Approved For Release 20CUM2L (IWR3M00914R000700070023-7 11 - N name. Software houses that would interested in software, even without in this area would include Stanford,