HIGH SPEED PRECISION COORDINATOGRAPH

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04747A001600020118-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 19, 2000
Sequence Number: 
118
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 24, 1963
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04747A001600020118-3.pdf57.1 KB
Body: 
STATOTHR Mr. P. O. Box 1407 Main Post Office Washington STATD bTHR ^ January 24, 1963 Declass Review, NIMA/DoD Subject: Hlgh S eed IRrecision Coordinatograph Dear Mr~ STATOTHR &A-rb IHK' further technical discussions with personnel of your office,- has re-examined the detailed specifications for a High Speed Precision Coordinatograph as described in our letter of 27 November 1962. We would like to present the following recommendations for your consideration: STATOTHR 1. In the design of a piece of equipment of this type, considerable latitude exists for trading one characteristic for another, for example, accuracy versus speed, flexibility versus operating simplicity, etc. Since further information about your application for this plotter has indicated that additional speed capability is desirable, we recommend changing the specifications of our proposed system in accordance with the enclosed Addendum Ito Technical Proposal dated 27 November 1962. STATOTHR 2. Our discussions have also indicated that further studies of the design STATOTHR capabilities of this equipment and the flexibility offered by the_ system may very well lead to a more optimum set of specifications Approved i-or eleasel lbtddyd b~f0 '? 6 g~'DP $~ D I fi~b` 66'b~2bt1l' yted Approved For F ase 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP78BO747AO01600020118-3 P472 - 2 - January 24, 1963 401 to markedly affect the overall cost of the equipment, we strongly recommend that a cost-plus-fixed-fee type of contract be issued for this system. Under such a contract specific decisions affecting capability versus cost may be answered by your people to fit your problems and objectives as we both come to understand the overall problem better. Otherwise we would be forced at this point to freeze a set of specifications when we know least about your appli- cations and you know least about the benefits and penalties of individual specification items. Accordingly, we are submitting herewith our revised Cost Proposal which supersedes our Cost Proposal dated 27 November 1962. We are looking forward with pleasure to the opportunity to work with you in this program. If we can supply you with any additional information or assist you in expediting the award of this contract please let us know. STATOTHR Yours very truly, RWL: P Enclosure Vice President Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP78BO4747AO01600020118-3