CLASSIFICATION REVIEW PROCEDURE INFORMATION INDICATIVE OF QUESTIONABLE ACTIVITIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP93B01194R001000240037-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 28, 2002
Sequence Number: 
37
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 8, 1979
Content Type: 
REQ
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP93B01194R001000240037-5.pdf82.53 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 200 N F"ftt1194R001000243 37!5 Wo 8 August 1979 Classification Review Procedure CRP 79-33 INFORMATION INDICATIVE OF QUESTIONABLE ACTIVITIES 1. A serious responsibility rests on every reviewer to be alert during classification reviews of CIA material for any information on activities which have been challenged as questionable, or which appear to provide evidence of possible wrongdoing or of suggestions and recom- mendations for actions which could have led to wrongdoing had they been carried out. This may include information not only on actions readily recognizable as potentially illegal, but also on any which the majority of Americans might view as immoral, unethical, or reprehensible according to present standards and beliefs. The Agency has been criticized for alleged involvement in attempted assassinations, testing drugs on un- witting subjects, seeking ways to affect human behavior (often referred to under the umbrella cryptonym MKULTRA), mail censorship, operations involving student organizations, and the operational use of American journalists. 0 2. Reviewers should be alert to information concerning such activities as well as others which might also be considered questionable. All such cases should be noted, even those involving recommendations turned down and never implemented. This often happened, and in one sense has a positive connotation for the Agency by demonstrating that such sties were not acceptable as a policy matter even at the time. 3. If information concerning such activities is uncovered, CRD must ensure that the responsible Directorate or Office is-advised so that action can be taken to notify senior Agency management and intel- ligence oversight bodies as appropriate. Reviewers finding such infor- mation, or having questions as to whether certain information might fit within the defined categories, should bring it to the attention of the Branch Chief representing the Directorate involved. Branch Chiefs will be responsible for advising C/CRD and taking action as may be required with the appropriate Directorate or other component. Should a document requiring transmission to a component be found, the CRD Branch Chief concerned will forward a copy thereof to that component and obtain a receipt. 7 25X1A lZee Alsso S CA P"? S '~- ie , Classification Review Division ORIGINAL CL BY _ D DECL PS REVW ON ~" ~~yy~~ [ ~ ~1 IAI EXT BYND 6 YRS BY Approved For Release 2002/.0 24 Ft%A~R~"9 61194RfOA.8QOV 0037;,