VIET MESS LAID TO CANADIANS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP66B00403R000200150001-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 1, 2006
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 1, 1964
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP66B00403R000200150001-1.pdf357.33 KB
Body: 
Approved For-Release 2006/08/01 CIA-RDP66B00403R000200150001-1 1964 COESSIONAL RECORD - APPENDI conference of Thursday and circulated to the "There is no justification for any sub- press. It amazed millers, bakers, and the stantial increase in flour prices this year, flour trade. nor will the price of wheat and flour justify BLIND Ttl FLbmIR RISE or To 84.60 CENTS higher bread prices. over ' the action of Secretary " that In the fact, there is announced flour ur price, preason to believe Amazement . Freeman in pointing to "no justification for . increases of any substantial increase in flour prices this up to 80 cents a hundredweight cannot be year" was aroused by the fact that the ad- sustained, vances in wheat `costs to mills over 1963, as During June, for example, millers paid reported by his own Agricultural Marketing less for a bushel of wheat than at any time Service, are equal to as much as 84.60 cents in the past 18 years. In Kansas City, the per hundredweight of flour. Other advances average price of wheat declined by 56 cents in wheat in the principal markets of the between April and June, or an equivalent Of United States, as reported by the AMS, range about $1.31 per 100 pounds of flour. Flour down to 11 cents a bushel or the equal of prices during June, however, were quoted at around 25 cents per hundredweight of flour. about April levels. and were slightly above May levels. CASH WHEAT PRICE COMPARISONS 'Mills operated at about 25 percent above Quotations on cash wheat on the princi- the June 1963 level in June 1964. This pal markets as of July 9 and a year ago, as action created a large flour inventory to compiled and published by the Grain carry bakers through the first weeks of the Division of the AMS of the Department of new crop year. Agriculture, together with the cost to mills "Even at the June asking price for flour for flour with the addition of the 70-cent from this inventory the milling industry processing tax follow per bushel: likely would enjoy strong profits since it ob- July 9 market July 9 with tax July 9, 1963 Kansas City No. I Hard Winter, 13 percent 2 R d $1.11-$1.71 $2.30-$2.42 $2.04-$2.15 e Chicago No. Winter___-________ 1.49 2,19 1.86 Toledo No. 2 Red Winter__:_________ 1.45 2.15 1.79 St. Louis No. 2 Red Winter______ ---- 1.47- 1.50 2.17- 2.20 1.84- 1.89 Minnesota No. Y Northern Dark Spring, 13 ppercent- Fort Worth No. i 1.74 2.44 2.31- 2.33 Hard Winter______ 1.87- 1.92 2.57- 2.62 2.34- 2.44 Portland No. I Soft White_____________ 1.53 2.23 1.96 1.97 The Kansas City market quotations are up 26 at 27 cents a bushel over ayear ago, including the processing tax of 70 cents, or the equal of as much as 63.45 cents per hundredweight of flour. On the Toledo market, No. 2 Soft Winter wheat is up 36 cents a bushel with the tax, equal to 86.4 cents per hundredweight. The statement by Mr. Freeman ignored the foregoing price facts on wheat of his own Department and even presented criticisms on mill asking prices on `flour absolutely without foundation so far as practical milling practices are concerned, BEFUDDLING ONPRICES OP BREAD In his continents on Bread prices, Mr. Free- man, presented loose, befuddling observa- tions that ignored existing realities. He at- tributed this season's lack of substantial bookings of flour by bakers to July asking prices of the mills in relation to June inven- tories of wheat when in fact the new weird wheat program with its tax has raised flour costs to levels which bakers cannot absorb through existing bread prices. SECRETARY'S, STATEMENT ON PRICING The text of Mr. Freeman's ?-statement on Wheat and flour, made to the press in mimeo- graphed form, follows: "All indications point to a very satisfactory ,transition from one wheat program to an- other during the past2 or 3 months. This is the product of close cooperation between the Department and the grain and milling trades. "The Kansas City Star reported Sunday that 'the transition from the old to the new wheat program last Wednesday at the Kansas City Board of Trade was as smooth as if the ,grain trade had been equipped with an auto- matic transmission.' "At the same time, there are reports that millers have raised flour prices and that bakers may raise bread prices as the new wheat program goes into effect. tamed the wheat at very low cost. But the higher July asking price on this Inventory is clearly out of line and the lack of any sub- stantial sales to date would indicate the baking industry reflects this view. "During consideration and since passage of the cotton-wheat bill in April, we pre- dicted that wheat and flour prices In the coming year would be near the levels of the last 2 years. Prices should be below 1962-63 levels and slightly above 1963-64 levels. "Bakers are expected to pay about as much for the wheat in a loaf of bread as they did in 1962-63 and about two-tenths of a cent more than last year. "Bread prices increased slightly in 1963 even though the cost of wheat declined, re- fleeting other cost factors than wheat and other farm commodities. Since bread prices did not come down when wheat prices de- clined, there is no justification for saying bread prices should go up when wheat prices increase. "Any Increase In the price of bread be- yond two-tenths cent will have to be at- tributed to other costs. We will be watch- ing the movement of prices closely to in- sure that consumers will be aware of the cause of any significant change in bread prices." QUESTIONS ANY TAX SIMILARITY Asked about the certificate levy of 70 cents a bushel which millers and bakers term a tax, Mr. Freeman said that it cannot be compared to the processing tax which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated in 1936. Various reports reaching Washington still indicate that suits will be filed to test the validity of the certificate or processing tax plan. The question and answer at the press con- ference on the constitutionality of the cer- tificate follows: "Mr. Secretary, as you may have heard, various associations are exploring the pos- sibilities of challenging the constitutionality of the wheat certificate program in the courts. And in view of the fact that a simi- lar plan was declared unconstitutional in 1938 by the Supreme Court, what would be your reaction?" Mr. FREEMAN. "Well, I don't think that this plan is a similar plan or is anyway com- parable to what would be declared uncon- stiti}tional. I am advised by the general counsel of this, Department that there is no really valid legal question and I would only say, personally, having looked at this rather closely, and having felt at one time that I was a very competent attorney, I say that now I don't think that there is any uncon- stitutional question here." A3905 KANSAS CERTIFICATES $100 MILLION In another statement made by Secretary Freeman at the press conference, in which he presented what he termed some "score- cards" for the coming political campaigns, data were presented on payments which farmers would receive through the certificate program. The statement presented an esti- mate of $100 million on the certificate value for the wheat farmers of Kansas alone with 100,395 participants. Mr. Freeman placed the average per Kansas farm at $1,070. But the secretary made no reference whatever in this statement to the fact that the drop in wheat supports for 1964 to an average of $1.30 as against $1.82 in 1963 means a po- tential shrinkage of $111 million in the basic returns of the Kansas farmers from their harvest of this year. Fair Legislative Apportionment EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. WILLIAM G. BRAY OF INDIANA IN THE f'IOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Tuesday, July 21, 1964 Mr. BRAY. Mr. Speaker, the recent decision by the Supreme Court that in States which have bicameral legislatures membership in both houses must be ap- portioned on the basis of population has caused widespread reaction. It is argued in many quarters that a complete reliance on population equal- ity does an injustice to other factors which might rightly be included in de- termining fair and adequate representa- tion. The case for a differentiation be- tween counties in factors other than population alone is well stated in the fol- lowing editorial, which appeared in the July 24, 1964, issue of the Indianapolis News. It is of interest that Earl Warren, then the Governor of California, at that time opposed reapportionment of the State senate on a strictly population basis. WARREN VERSUS WARREN The Supreme Court under Earl Warren has ruled that both houses of America's State legislatures must be apportioned on a strict population basis. This decision is revolutionary on two counts. It arrogates to the Federal Govern- ment the authority to rearrange the purely internal affairs of the States. And it at- tempts to impose by flat it populistic, level- ing notion of representation which was ex- plicitly rejected by this Nation's Founders. This being so, rebuttal from a high State official pointing out the fallacy of the War- ren Court's decision is very much in order. The "one man one vote" theory is fallacious, said this official on the following grounds: "Many * * * counties are far more impor- tant in the life of the State than their pop- ulation bears to the entire population of the State. It is for this reason that I have never been in favor of restricting their representa- tion in the senate to a strictly population basis. "It is for the same reason that the Found- ing Fathers of our country gave balanced representation to the States of the Union, equal representation in one house and pro- portionate representation in the other. "There was a time when [this State] was completely dominated by boss rule * * *. Any weakening of the laws would invite a Approved For Release 2006/08/01: CIA-R DP66B00403R00'0200150001-1 A8906 Approved For Release 2006/08/01: CIA-RQP66B004 000200150001-1 Pow s CONE SSIo AL'RECOItD AP ' ? " IX return bt boss rule, which we are now hap- rid of" 'lhs State.oIDclal In question? None other V= Earl Warren.. speaking some 16 years ago as Governor of the State of California. EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. ROMAN C. PUCINSKI or MUMOTS zN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday, July 1, 1964 Mr. PUCThlSKI. Mr. Speaker, the Chi- cago Tribune carried a most revealing article In its editions of Thursday, July 23, which puts a new perspective on our problems in Vietnai i. The article was written by the Trib- une's Canadian bureau chief, Mr. Eugene Griffin, who is a -'most highly respected journalist. I would, suggest, that the cynics and the skeptics who have been so quick to sell our own cottwitry' short ' in our efforts to deal with the, problem in Vietnam, care- fully analyze Mr. Griflln's article. It has become. popular In some quarters :to, Bee who can n1gSttl}oroughly belittle American, efforts , . in foreign policy. Those who have been selling our country short would d,o lvq~j ,to reflect on the many forces currently at work in Viet- nam whit have led to I1p present situa tion whicresident Joinsgn is attempt- ing to .resolve withoq`t involving the United S , ten in aA-out arniec conf;ict. Mr. rin's "ex To cellent ari~Te follows: VIBT Mzss LAtn CANADIANS--CHARGES TaOL VTrr 3oWaD TO REDS (By Eugene Griffin) QITAWA,, ONTAauo July 22.-Communist power has been butt u to Vietnam because of the Ineffective Cana team that repre- sents the West p the,Iz} ernational Control Commission, a former officer with the Can- adians has charged in Vancouver. Squadron Leader Hugh Campbell, now re- tired from the Aoygl Canadian Air Force, who served in 'hvj z am j# 1961 and 1962 as air adviser to the l anatlian mission, said that, "by 1962 the Canadians In North Viet- nam were, virtually prisoners under armed guard? Canada is on the Control Commission with India and Poland to see that South Viet- nam and Conununiat North Vietnam ad- here to the Geneva agreement of 1954, which forbids., the creatjgn of aggressive force. Campbell said `that ` Canada's performance has become a "W60" and an "international joke," as Canadians allow themselves to be pushed around by the Poles. Canadians on the 'Control Commission, he said, have accepted such "ridiculous cha- rades" as one 16-minute inspection a week of trains eatg lug_Vietnam on the most tm- plirtant railroad from Red Chlna-"the Canadiaps "being free to Inspect only empty boxcars." "Canadians were forbidden entry onto docks and air fields," Campbell said in the Vancouver Sun, "with such smirking ex- planations as, 'This is now a private civilian flying club'-the Pole standing by grinning." "During 10 years of Communist military buildup and Vietcong depredations," Camp- bell said, "when we should have been battling for every vantage point and screaming to high heaven whenever the Communists vio- Viiet Nees Laid to Cenad'iaoi sated the agreement ? ? 'we protested po- litely, . Ineffectually, and thrust our head back into the sand. "We made no serious attempt to win. On the contrary, so casual was our concern, we didn't bother to field our beet' team. We sent in a scrub team of iii-trained amateurs to face professionals--tough pros who made their own rules and clobbered the daylights out of us. "Canadians suffered chivvying and harass- ment and Indignities, and our efforts in Viet- nam became an International joke. We should have taken some action. Any action. Even petulant screams would have Indicated that at least we cared. "Instead, we blandly carry on ' ? ? quite unconscious of the fact that a large share of responsibility for today's unholy mesa in Vietnam is ours." Half "Drop Out" in Youth Labor Test EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. BURT L. TALCOTT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Tuesday, July 21, f964 Mr. TALCOTT. Mr. Speaker, the fol- lowing is a firsthand report of another attempt by desperate growers to find suf- ficient labor to prevent field crops from spoiling. In this YMCA-supervised ex- periment, half of the youths lasted only two weeks. This may be a high record of success for a youth employment proj- ect, but it gives little satisfaction to the grower whose crops may spoil within hours after maturity unless properly harvested. The following report is from the Sa- linas Californian of July 1. 1964: NINE DROP Our IN YouTm L"oa Tzar Half of the 18 San Francisco YMCA youths who atartgd to work In the produce fields here June 17 have dropped out of the ex- perimental summer enjoyment program. Pete Bowers, the YMCA worker in charge of the group, said four of the boys returned to San Francisco after the first 3 days of work In the strawberry fields. Another four dropped out of the program before the first week ended. THREE JOIN Meanwhile, Bowers said, three additional boys from San Francisco joined those who are remaining here at Merrill Farms' Moon Camp with Bowers and his aavistant, Art Mays. Of the nine boys who returned to their homes, Bowers said, only one left the pro- gram for medical reasons. All of the f8 youths who came here went through a rigorous 3-week'training program to condition them for work in the fields. Bowes told the youngsters that they could expect it to take about 2 weeks before they'd become accustomed to the heavy physical demands of 12 bourn a day in the fields. HECOMINO ACCusTOMIED The YMCA supervisor said that the youths who remained are now becoming accustomed to their jobs and are determined to stick it out through the summer. Moreover, said Bowers, who chartered the experimental program as a source of summer employment for city youths. half the young- sters who dropped out of the program have indicated they'd like to come back down here and return to work- July 27 "That's up to Merrill Farms"' said Bowers, "but I don't think I would recommend them.- PICK BTRAWHERRIES During the first week here. the youngsters picked and hoed strawberries. Now the youths are loading celerly in the fields and picking strawberries. Bowers said the boys feel the food at the Camp is "top notch" and that they're now making contacts and becoming more familiar with the community, But, said the supervisor, "Their free time is precious and at a minimum." Most of the boys, who've now been here more than 2 weeks, have received their first paychecks and have started local bank ac- counts, Bowers said. Bowers said he hopes soon to launch a series of programs for the boys, including the scheduling of speakers during the week. "Also," he mid. "we hope to get the parents down here sometime, maybe on the rodeo weekend." EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. JOHN J. McFALL OF CALIFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Monday, July 27, 1964 Mr. McFALL. Mr. Speaker, Yosemite National Park is one of the most famous scenic wonders of the world. Just a few days ago, the 100th anniversary of the creation of this park was marked by appropriate ceremonies. My good friend and colleague, Repre- sentative HAROLD T. (Brcz) JOHNSON, who ably represents much of the mountainous area of California including Yosemite, traced some history of this world famed park in a speech prepared for the oc- casion. I would like to share this with my colleagues here in the House of Rep- resentatives and at this point I would like to insert his remarks into the RECORD. Just 100 years ago next Tuesday, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Yosemite grant. This grant-called the act of 1864-trans- ferred from the public domain to the State of California what is described in the lan- guage of the grant itself as the "cleft" or "gorge" In the granite peak of the Sierra Nevada Mountains, known as the Yo-Semite Valley, and what is known as the "Mariposa Big Tree Grove." The grant went on to say that It was made on the express condition that "the premises shall be held for public use, resort, and recreation * ? ? inalienable for all time." By this act or grant, Congress established a new concept of public land use-to protect and conserve a specified part of the public domain for recreation and enjoyment. Moreover, the action came when the Nation was torn by Civil War and at a time when much of the continent was still wilderness and unknown. It adds stature to the memory of Abraham Lincoln and to the greatness of the ideas and ideals upon which our Nation is founded to know that in that act of 1864 was laid one of the great foundation stones of conservation- a recognition by our Government that nature and natural beauty have a vital place in our country. This idea of preserving for all the people examples of their natural heritage was born in the minds of a few men who loved this Yosemite the vision to, see Approved For Release 2006/08/01 : CIA-R?P66B00403RO002OQ150001-1