(Sanitized))

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 9, 2001
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 5, 1973
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7.pdf189.07 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/05/06 CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430QM,- 73-1684 OGC SUBJ: DOMESTIC RELATIONS CSB 73-472 ~l .. 5 September 1973 25X1A. 25X1A om of EA Division '--25X1 A ll f i i r ng a ca v 1. After rece (CCS/OCB)advised the undersigned that had apparently decided tow?- 25X1A taro a divorce from his wife. He and his wife are currently in the United States on home leave. She had been safe-havened in Owhile he was officially 25X1A 25X1 stationed in she is a naturalized citizen (1970) of the United States. 25X1F 25X1 25X1 W1T TH She was former y etnammese from Chinese parentage. 2. Apparently the announcement of the divorce was a surprise to the wife and she, after getting over the initial shock, went to visit friends in North Carolina- who who is currently assigned to The undersigned discussed tI5X1A e mi. EA Personnel. He states that the wife was Witting !ffA-TOTHR And that she had retained a lawyer in Mitzi by the of has also retained a awyer ami by the name o (This lawyer is not cleared,.however has made a national 2 5X1A Agency trace and received a negative response.) 25X1 C 2 5X1 c 3. It was decided by the undersigned that: advise the lawyers that iwas an Agency employee. In order to forestall any possible later embarrassment resulting from any counter suits or claims, a call to Mr. OGC, confirmed that he was going to 0 on September 10 and 5X1 A ' u r, at that time. He was asked to do so and he stated that 25X14 he would. was told that Iras supposed to be in Headquarters 25X1 A Monde September 10 and that if we could get hold of him we would do so and ad- 25X1 4 vise I lof the result of our discussions with I iso that he 25X1 A would have this information available prior to his briefing of the lawyers. 25X1A 25X1A 25X14 Distribution: C orij - CCS/ci # ;.' Y I' = Mr. 1 Ch; 1 - Re ccS /c& cGC SECRET S2 IMPDET CL BY 063851 25X1A Approved For Release 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7 Approved For Release 2002/05/06: CIA-RDP75-007900100430005-7 14 November 1973 1. At 1530 Coda attorney, called the undersigned. With him was explained that and their son were with Judge Edward S. Klein, Judge, Dade County Circuit Court, in his chambers awaiting their return. He explained further that under a provision of Florida law the Judge had ordered a period of marriage counseling prior to hearing further argument on the divorce action. By statute this period of counseling may not exceed three months and according to it normally lasts about a month. At the time of making this order, the Judge directed counsels to ask the Agency two specific questions: (a) Would this cause his job with the Agency . ; an a, (b) During this period of counseling, would be paid? STATINTL STATOTHR STATINTL STATINTL 2. also explained that the counseling could be done by a psychiatrist, psychologist or a marriage counselor; that it would not necessarily have to be done in Florida, and even if done in Florida, it could be done on weekends or on a weekday at the beginning or toward the end of a workweek. I Approved For Release 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7 Approved For&lease 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-007900100430005-7 put the attorneys on hold and calle Chief, VNO/Personnel, who was not in. I spoke with STATINTL is de t who received the two questions STATINTL an en went to Chief, EA/P returned saying a a was 's position tha would not be fired and that, assuming that he continued to STATINTL STATINTL work at his job here in the area and undertake this counseling on his own time (weekends or annual leave) and at his own expense, he would of course continue to be paid. I relayed this information back to Messrs. Iwho said STATOTHR that they would so inform the Jud . STATOTHR STATINTL STATINTL 3. vised that he and had STATOTHR stipulated salary information an a he Judge had ordered t e case file to be sealed. STATINTL cc: VNO/Personnel Distribuution: Original - DOMESTIC RELATIONS 1 -0 Signer Approved For Release 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7 STATINTL Approved For Release 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430005-7 .,Approved For Relea 2/05/06: CIA-RDP75-00793R0001D0430.005-7 STATINTL 1 November 1973 STATOTHR MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, VNO Personnel SUBJECT: parties cou r-Inq4:- fn operty settlement but STATOTHR that he and attorney, had a couple of question is an agreement the property settlement and it provirl s for paying the trans- STATINTL portation of I the child, and their jointly owned household effects back to w ould the Government pay these costs? He based the request on the assumption STATINTL I Iwould be going to a new assignment in shortly. STATINTL STATINTL STATOTHR 2. I replied that given the existence of the divorce action, I could not see how the Government could pay for the transportation of and the child to lI With respect to the house o e ects, it might be possible to move ll a or part of them at Government expense, if s assi ne~ t However, I said I would have to check on both p and call him back, probably on Monday. The divorce hearing is scheduled for 14 November. 3. Could you please review circumstances and let me have EA's views on his assignment and the question sherd 7 F----I y GMB:ks Distribution: Dade County Circuit Court, Miami, [- Divorce Action, signed recalired a call today from Jattorney. He stated the STATINTL Apps f dtbk 2002/05/0?Cyo%)~ggA7A3MOOg1.289gOo5-7 1 -F--] Signer 1- Chrono