AN OPEN LETTER TO FOREIGN DIPLOMATS RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES AND AMERICAN BUSINESS LEADERS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 8
• Document Creation Date: December 16, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 22, 2004
• Sequence Number: 37
• Publication Date: September 1, 1968
• Content Type: NSPR

Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
Copyright ? 1968, Geza Korda, New York, N.Y.
Vol. 3, No. 1. September, 1968
The Liberty of The Press Shall Be Inviolably Preserved"
5Trademark registered 1967 United
G.P.O. Box 174, New York, N.Y. 10001
AN OPEN LETTER TO FOREIGN DIPLOMATS RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES AND
AMERICAN BUSINESS LEADERS
The Solution Of World Problems Through East-West Trade
In a world of realities, penalties are heavy
for illusions. Human nature does not change. As
.Karl von Clausewitz, the German militarist-
theoritician said, war remained "the continua-
tion of politics by other means" and "an act of
violence for the purpose of compelling the ad-
versary to fulfill our will."
Politics is nothing but the -concentrated form
or economics. While human nature did not
change, the ways and means of individuals and
nations to achieve their aspirations and ends
are in a process of continuous change. Science
is most responsible for that change. But it has
no principles, religion, nationality or race.
Through science mankind arrived to the point
that if and when all available ways and means
would be applied in military war, the only victor
would be Death itself ; hence military war de-
feated its own purpose!
Does that mean that peoples of the world will
live together in peace? Of course, not! Peace
is the irrealistic object of daydreamers. War
must continue but since military war became
outdated and obsolete, we must use the next pos-
sibilities: the economic-political war. In such
war, as before, but in other ways, the inferior
struggles to become equal, and once equal he
tries to become superior by toppling down the
decaying pro forma superior. This perpetual
struggle and change, where the fittest survive
is in full accordance with the Natural Laic.
The purpose of my writing to you is to invite
you to a meeting where East-West trade can be
discussed. If you think that competition based on
initiative is the key of progress, if you promote
peace in respect to military war, progress and
prosperity and competitive co-existence between
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS
East-West Trade The Starting Process For The Federation Of Eastern Europea Countries
Man does not live by bread alone but first of
an by bread. rouct, shelter and clothes i.e. mate-
rialism preoccupies man. Once the materialistic
need is satisfied, then other aspects of life should
be taken into consideration and not before. If
a man is hungry and is freezing without adequate
clothes and shelter, it would be 'a sheer nonsense
to talk to him e.g. about the existence or non-
existence of God.
The above thoughts apply to primitive societies.
Developed and civilized societies have much more
problems. The progress made by science and its
use for military weapons, advanced communica-
tion and transportation created fundamental
changes at such rapid speed, that one really has
to stop once in a while and do some thinking;
what should and should not to be done.
In the following, I make an attempt to think
in writing concerning East-West relations with
the frame of mind of an Eastern European but
seeing it. from the U.S. Certainly, it is not an
easy task but worthwhile to try it.
The most practical approach to it, is to con-
sider facts. One must realize that since WW II
public opinion of the world has been most in-
fluenced by the propaganda machines of the two
superpowers, the U.S. and the Soviet Union. The
U.S. promotes such propaganda through dollar-
diplomacy, the Soviet Union through the various
cornmunjst parties outside the Soviet Union. For
practical and tactical purposes I consider both
superpowers as imperialistic and analyze them
1 y- illustrations (for lack of space a detailed
j ualysis is not possible) through the same stand-
(ft d of judgement.
I engage diplomatic and plain language. Also
tie "carrots-language" and the "stick-language"
ws hich ever is necessary the name the facts and
ec.'unterbalance the two propaganda machines.
T) !e struggle in the arena of international power-
pol.itics creates its own rules, regulations and
law s. Fictions are created to cover facts, if and
when, it =s necessary. One of my aims is that
the workers but first of all the American workers
understand mny writing.
First let's take the U.S.A.
In 1776 it had a territory of 386,000 sq.mi. In
the Following 130 years the U.S. enlarged its
posse: ;lion by war, seizure, annexion, purchase
or otherwise by more than 3,000,000 sa.mi. The
Historical Register of the U.S. Army published
in 1903 contains a list of 114 wars in which the
U.S. engaged after 1775. These wars involved
8,600 battles and engagements.
Here are the principa; enlargements : Louisiana
of 827,000 sq.mi. in 1803; Florida of 58,600 sq.mi.
in 1819; Texas of 389,000 sq.mi. in 1845; Oregon
of 286,000 sq.mi. in 1846; Utah, Arizona, New
Mexico and California of 529,000 sq,mi. in 1853;
Gadsen territory from Mexico of 30,000 sq.mi. in
1853. (2,119,600 sq.mi.)
In the second half of the century the U.S. added
another 716,666 sq.mi. to its national possession
which include Alaska in 1867; Philippines, Guam,
Porto Rico, Hawaiian Island in 1898-, Samoa in
1899; Panama Canal Zone in 1903 and Virgin
Islands in 1917.
Before entering WW I, the U.S. was a debtor
country of $3,000,000,000. After WW I, the U.S.
emerged as a creditor country to the extent of
816,000,000,000. According to the Soviet propa-
ganda the more blood is split, the bigger the
profits and wealth of the American munition
tycoons, who made $46,000,000,000 net profit
in WW I, and $123,000,000,000 net profit in
WW II.
U.S. Senator Cabot Lodge said on January 7,
1901: "The American people and the economic
forces which underlie all are carrying us for-
ward to the economic supremacy of the world."
Harry S. Truman said on December 19, 1945:
"Whether we like or not, we must recognize that
the victory which we have won has placed upon
the American people the continuing burder of
responsibility for world leadership." Theodore
Roosevelt once said: "I never take a step in
foreign policy unless I am assured that I shall
be able eventually to carry out my will by force."
Theodore Roosevelt believed in a policy of speak-
ing softly but carrying the Big Stick, i.e. if car-
rots do not work, use the Big Stick.
Lieut. Gen. A. C. Wedemeyer said on March 5,
1949: "We must think in terms of blood as well
as of money. We must have military support and
protection of our economic investments wher-
ever forces threaten everything that we hold
dear."
East and West that meeting will be of great
benefit to you or your representative.
Concerning the details of the subject-matter
to be discussed during the meeting, as a first
step, it would be necessary to read the 60 pages
I mentioned in the Open Letter to Secretary Gen-
eral of the United Nations. The Xerox-copies of
those 60 pages are available to you, if you request
them.
This copy also was mailed to 112 Ambassadors
of foreign countries in Washington, D.C., 124
Ambassadors of UN-Delegations and 177 Pres-
idents of large U.S. manufacturing and banking
corporations, and other persons in key positions
of economic-political leadership.
Your inquiries are welcome.
New York, September 1968.
7.7' ace General Srn,,Tev Hulce. C,.n"mr '-tn-
dant oi' the U.S. Corps, summed up his
experience as an imperialist gunman in the
November, 1935 issue of "Common Sense" : "I
spent thirty-three years and four months in
active service as a member of our country's most
active military force - The Marine Corps . . .
and during that time. I spent most of my time as
a high-class muscle man for big business, for
Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a
racketeer for capitalism . . . during those years
I had, as the boys in the back room would say,
a swell racket. Loekiu,ig buck on it, I feel I might
have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he
could do was to operate his racket in three city
districts. We Marines operated in three conti-
nents." By now the U.S. Armed Forces operate
in five continents'
One ww onders, what the Soviet Generals would
write - IF - they had the freedom to do so -
about the Soviet military onslaught against Hun-
gary in 1956 and the Soviet military invasion of
Czechoslovakia in 1968?
Vic- President Hnbert H. Humphrey said on
July 12, 1968: "We are not the world's police-
man. How people wish to govern themselves, and
how they wish to change their government -
that's their business." If the U.S. government
only would do what it is preaching and the ar-
rogant American imperialists in the late 40-s
and early 50-s represented by the Dulles-clique
only would have listened to General MacArthur
and Marshall Montgomery, the U.S. never would
have committed the blunder to engage a military
landsw ar in Asia. Neither in Korea nor in Viet-
nam. Nor they should engage in any military
action in the Middle Eeast!
Until now more than 30.000 Americans were
slaughtered in Vietnam. There are more than
180,000 casualties and more than $100,000.000,-
000 have been squandered in the senseless slaugh-
ter in Vietnam. On June 25, 1968 over the Quang
Bihn Province the 3,000:h L.S. aircraft was shot
down. The American Air Force has dropped on
Vietnam more bombs than were dropped on the
territory of Germany during WW II. For the
U.S. from both human and material points it
costs more to cause damage, than damage itself.
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
 Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
CREATIVE HUNGARIAN
(ALKOTO MAGYAR)
An economic-political publication.
Printed in U.S.A.
Copyright Geza Korda
New York, N.Y. Price 50y, a copy
Publisher and editor: Geza Korda
Address: G.P.O. Box 174
New York, N.Y. 10001, U.S.A.
For the U.S. Vietnam is a stupid war not only
from the military but also from the economic-
political view.
The great American dilemma is now: shall
we pull out from Vietnam? The answer is given
by those we follow the philosophy and tactics of
Mao The-tung: No! Stay there American im-
perialists until we break your arrogance, and
then the Vietnam war will come to end through
political settlement on our terms!!! Asia belongs
to the Asians.
And now, let's turn to the Soviet Union, the
"Paradise of the Workers".
The very existence of the Soviet Union started
in 1462 by the Grand Dutchy of Muskovy. Czar-
ist Russia expansion by territories of the peo-
ples in European part of the Euro-Asian con =
tinent is: 1462-1505: Samoyeds, Nentsis-Samo-
yeds, Komi-Zyrians, Permiaks, Kerelians; 1505-
1682: Edmurts, Tartars, Bashkirs, Mordovians,
Uralian Cossacks, Kalmucks, Cossacks on the
Dori, Cossacks on the Terek, Little Russians, Uk-
rainians; 1682-1725: Estonians; 1725-1796: Lat-
vians, Lithuanians, White Russians; 1796-1825:
Karachays, Ossentins, Kabardinians, Daghesti,
Armenians, Azerbaidzhani, Cherkessi, Abhazi,
Rumanians, Bessarabians, Poles, Fins; 1825-
1881: Georgians.
The Soviet Union followed the imperialism
of the Czarist Russia. 1920-1921: Ukraine, Geor-
gia, Armenia, Azerbaijan; 1939-1945: Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania; after 1945 with more or less
results: Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Po-
land, Rumania, Yugoslavia, and the Eastern part
of Germany.
In Asia: 1462-1584: Mari, Chuvasi, Udmurts,
Manis-Voguls, Nentsis-Samoyeds, Ostyak-Khan-
tys; 1584-1689: Evenkis-Tungus, Yakuts, Kha-
kassis, Tuvinians, Buryats-Mongols, Yukagirs,
Chukchis-Luravetianys, Koryaks, Nymylanys,
Kamchadatics; 1689-1796: Oyrots, Altasi, Khal-
kas; 1796-1914: Kara-Kalpaks, Turkmen, Uzbeks,
Tadshiks, Kirghisi, Kurds. After 1945: Kurile
Islands and Sakhalin.
Sortie names appear twice, since those peoples
lived in European as well as in Asian territory.
Also, because some of them were liberated then
subjugated again.
The Soviet propaganda machine once had been
very effective but as time passed by more and
more people realized that under the cloak of Marx-
ism-Leninism the Soviet Union is practicising im-
perialism. The leaders in Moscow also have to
know: you can't fool all of the peoples all of
the times.
Let's consider the achievements of the Soviet
Union, and give the credit where it belongs. One
must realize it took England 300 years to de-
velop her industry; 150 years for the U.S.; 100
years for Germany; 75 years for Japan and 50
years for the Soviet Union. Each country bene-
fited from the previous developments. The Soviet
propaganda takes all credits. Further, it never
mentions the industrial know-how and material
assistance received from the U.S. in connection
with WW II and a 11 what they t o o k from
Germany after 1945. It never mentions the eco-
nomic exploitation of Eastern Europe through
"commercial" agreements, where the Soviet
Union sets the price as buyer as well as seller.
Of course, buying at much lower prices then
world market prices, and selling at a much high-
er price than world market prices. To assure
hughe profits the Soviet armed forces give full
guaranty. The Soviet Union is the worst of all
bad imperialists!
At Expo 67 in Montreal, Canada a great num-
ber of people saw the show-window of "socialist
realism" in the Soviet Union. At the Osaka World
Exhibition in 1970 the Soviet pavilion will re-
semble in shape of an unfurled red banner with
the emblem of the hammer and sickle. It will be
100 meters high covering an area of 20,000 square
meters. It is designed as a symbol of the Soviet
Union's dynamism. Like in Montreal it will show
Soviet "socialist realism" on the surface which
is nothing but glorification of the Soviet Union.
And now let's see American and Soviet im-
perialism side by side.
In order to clear the picture blurred by the
propaganda machines of Soviet and American
imperialists one must be first of all alert to the
use of semantics and of course separate facts
from fictions.
Freedom; liberty; law and order; peace at
home and abroad; one nation under God, invisible,
with liberty and justice for all; sincere friendship;
comeradely discussion; frank and comeradely ex-
change; socialist solidarity; socialist democracy;
independence; peace and security; territorial in-
tegrity; non-interference in internal affairs;
aggression and revenge ; war of liberation; just
wars; unjust wars; unbridled anti-socialist dem-
agogy ; treaties and agreements linking socialist
countries with one another ; commercial agree-
ments at mutual benefits; mutual obligations of
states and peoples based on the general aspira-
tion to defend socialism and ensure security of
the socialist countries; military assistance to de-
fend the achievements of socialism against its
enemies; and so 'Prth and so on, are only im-
persialists catchwords and slogans fabricated
by phrasemakers to mislead the masses. One
never should pay too much attention what the
imperialists say, but only what they do. The
word democracy e.g. is recklessly used in the
Soviet Union as well as in the U.S. In both coun-
tries it has no practical meaning. It's a bluff.
The worst misleading word is, however: EQUAL-
ITY.
It is necessary to nail down, we all are equal
twice in our life. At our birth and when we die.
Between those two times, we are UNEQUAL,
or expressed in a different way: some of us are
more equal than others.
Lenin said in 1920 at the Third all-Russian
Trade Union Congress: "We are conducting a
class struggle Our aim is to abolish classes; so
long as there still exist two classes, those of
peasants and workers, socialism cannot be real-
ized." It is a fact, there is no communism in the
Soviet Union. It will be, however, when the aim
of communism: from each according to his ability
to each according to his need, will be a reality.
Since 1917 this aim is not yet realized. What we
have now in the Soviet Union is a system, where
the principle: from each according to his ability
to each according to his work, prevails. That sys-
tem based on such principle is now called social-
ism in the Soviet Union and capitalism in the
United States.
In reality, however, the present economic sys-
tem in the Soviet Union is state capitalism in
form of state monopolism, the political system
is despotism of the ruling class.
In the U.S. the economic system is private
monopolism, which controls the U.S. government.
The U.S. government permits political freedom.
but makes it ineffective by the power of the purse
of private monopolism.
The ruling classes of both superpowers sup-
press truth but in different ways. Yet they are
not equal. The despotism in the Soviet union is
more oppressive than the same in the U.S.
Lenin wanted to abolish all classes and make
people equal. The statement of the Communist
and worker's parties of the socialist countries
on August 3, 1968 - as printed in Pravda -
recognized the existence of three classes in the
Soviet Union: working class, peasantry and in-
telligentsia. Hence, according to the concepts of
Lenin, not even socialism is existent in the Sov-
iet Union. It exists only in the propaganda of
the Soviet Union.
In 1943 the Soviet press hailed the appearance
of the first socialist millionaire comrade Berdy-
bekov (NY Times 7/4/1943 p.8E.col.3.).
V. Y. Vishinsky wrote in "Information Bul-
letin" published by the Soviet Embassy in Wash-
ington, D.C. on November 17, 1945: "The Soviet
system is the cradle of new classes, such as have
never before been known in history. Our work-
ing class and our collective farmers are in their
social nature new classes, as is also the new
a
September, 1968
Soviet intelligentsia, whose character has been
formed by the new socialist relations. The same
"Information Bulletin" writes on January 29,
1946: "The Constitution of the U.S.S.R. ensures
. . . the right to inherit and bequeth personal
property. In insuring this right, the Constitution
also insures the privileges of children born to
upper strata, to the offspring of Soviet mil-
lionaire Berdybekov, for example."
It is safe to say, in Orwellian terms, the Soviet
leaders know the language of the "new-speak".
Interestingly, the filmindustry of Hollywood
which is the biggest promoter of immorality
and crime and the servant of imperialists has no
intention to make a film of George Orwell's novel
"1984" written after WW II, and Imre Madach's
play "The Tragedy of Man", written in 1823.
Both writers were forecasting the battle against
tyranny in our century. The despotism of the
ruling classes of the two superpowers are sink-
ing deeper, and the determination of peoples for
freedom is rising higher. 30,000 Hungarians did
not die in vain in 1956 against the Soviet im-
perialists, and there are not 40,000 "counter-
revolutionists" in Czechoslovakia but 14,000,000
Slovaks and Czechs who are nothing but the
enemies of Soviet imperrialis'm!
Stalin said on February 9, 1946: "The election
campaign is the judgement of the electors of
the communist party, as being the party of the
rulers." One knows, however, that the existence
of rulers inescapably implies the existence of
the ruled.
Through the advance of science the survival
of a closed society is getting more difficult.
The most open society still exist in the U.S. and
the Soviet society is drifting away from being
a closed society. The intelligentsia is the ruling
class in the Soviet Union and the peasants and
workers the ruled class. The communist parties
outside the Soviet Union have a second thought
about the idea that all roads lead to Moscow.
Interesting is the communist party U.S.A. About
30ric of the "card-carrying communists" are
F.B.I. agents, the rest of them are nothing but
frustrated intellectuals.
In the U.S. the monopolists are the ruling class,
the rest is the ruled class not politically but eco-
nomically i.e. credit-system. Life for the ruled
is more bearable in the U.S. than in the Soviet
Union.
And now, let's see, how the ruling class live
in the Soviet Union, the "Land of Equality", the
"Paradise of the Workers".
Officially some Soviet citizens became more
equal than others through a speech of Stalin
when he attacked uravnilovka, i.e. the equality
of pay. Since then the officer caste of the armed
forces, managers, administrative officials, intel-
lectuals and professionals received 20, 30, 100
or even 300 times more payment than the work-
ers and peasants. But monetary income by no
means represents all the material benefits of
the Soviet un-socialist, un-democratic but despotic
ruling class. The dictatorship of the proletariat
in Lenin's concept does not exist any more. Of-
ficially it is replaced by the state of the entire
people. The ruling class controls the state, hence
they control the entire people i.e. the workers
and the peasants. For the ruled classes in the
Soviet Union freedom means to follow the orders
of the ruling class, or else.
The ruling class in the Soviet Union have a
house and a sumptuous one, a budget for pay-
ing a staff of servants, a car and a chauffeur,
the privilege of buying at exclusive stores where
goods otherwise unobtainable are sold at mod-
erate prices, vacations for themselves and their
families at exclusive resorts in the Soviet Uniola
and abroad. Free railroad and air transportatuic,ii
and in most cases exemption from paying taxe.;.
All these "nice things of life" are provided t o
them by the state, where the ruling class says :
l'Etat c'est moi !
Sons and daughters of the privileged bureau.
cratic ruling class enjoy all kind of priority, do
as they like and climb up the social ladder ra-
pidly, while those of workers, peasants and other
labouring people and the working youth are be-
ing squeezed out and discriminated against.
Very interesting is to observe the diplon-iatic
representation of the Soviet Union. Natu?eally,
only the most trusted ones, the most privi,,eged
ones are sent abroad. In their social acti\.,ities
such as cocktail parties in their desperate att empt
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 :
 Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
September, 1968 ALKOTo MAGYAR Page 3
to cover their despotism at home and build up the story of the lords of wealth and their glit- they defy with impunity the law of the land : the
prestige and status abroad, they excel in lavish tering clans. The book explained how America U.S. Constitution. The actions of many members
extravaganza even the plutocratic Western ruling was ruled by a plutocracy of inherited wealth, of the U.S. Congress are motivated by expedi-
classes. Such social "events" are well attended even under the "New Deal". At that time he could ency not by principles. Their oath of office to
by the American imperialists or their represen- only provide a sampling. of the economic and protect and defend the U.S. Constitution became
tatives. Yet the Czarist splendor practiced by political patterns of those families. His present a formality not to take seriously. Some of them
Soviet leaders can not overshadow real life of book is more than updating the old one. It is, would like to see the U.S. Constitution as a
workers and peasants in the Soviet Union. rather a systematic study of the entire wealthy museum piece to be treasured as the ancient
The slogan "Workers of the world, unite!" be- class and its familial structure. The book shows, marble and dust of the Acropolis. Yet, there are
came meaningless under the leadership of Mos- there are 200,000 very wealthy individuals in a few exemptions. Those exemptions can cause
cow. On February 25, 1956 N. S. Khrushchev at the U.S. Most of them belong to some 500 bil- changes of important decisions, where quality
the XXth Congress of the Communist Party of lionaire families. Examples are 250 Du Ponts, is versa quantity.
the S.U. denounced despot Stalin, despite the 73 Rockefellers. Some 61% of the 200,000 in- One of the most suppressed book in the U.S.
fact he himself was one of Stalin's comrade- herited their wealth. These families are far is "Destroy the Accuser" by Frederick Seelig.
wealthier than ever before. As an example the (191 pp. 1967) It is fully documented about the
in-crime. book shows how a thrifty multi-millionaire could tyranny of the U.S. government. Mr. Seelig, a prostitute In the U. and clergymen intellectuals, expediency- ake a year $19,939,652.39 and pay no income distinguished American of Jewish faith had-been
orpcifit and clergymen and. csome laimed p that Stediency- taxes, while his chauffeur pays hundreds of tax tortured to death in American prisons and insane
ism for-p is rofit over in the Soviet cm Union. d The Daniel- hl- dollars. It shows, how placing mighty fortunes asylums, because he exposed the corruption with-Sinyavsky and Galanskov-Ginzburg "trials" once into foundations magnifies the financial power in the U.S. Government. The reader of that book
of the super-wealthy families and how the U.S. will realize that in many respect the American
classmore. Karl rl proved the Marx once despotism said: : "theThe Soviet existence of ruling Senate and House of Representatives bent their terror is not different from Soviet terror. Only
collective wisdom to write a tax law for one the U.S. Supreme Court acted in the spirit of
the state is inseparable from the existence stence of Soviet man's benefit. Indeed the book gives explanation the U.S. Constitution and restored freedom to
slavery." The existence of the state in the who really owns America and how they, keep Mr. Seelig, who after publishing the book died.
Union is a reality. their wealth and their power. It explains, how He was tortured to death while John F. Kennedy
Continuing the use of same standard of critic- they manipulate through tax-free investments, was the President, and Robert F. Kennedy was
ism, let's further see the American imperialism. and dozen other legal means through their law- the "chief officer of law enforcement". After
George Washington said in 1796 in his im- makers, the members of the U.S. Congress. How reading this book, those who tend to glorify the
mortal Farewell Address: ". . . the nation which the sons and daughters of these 500 super-bil- Kennedy-clan will be nauseated from the despot-
indulges toward another a habitual hatred or lionaires self-propelling and self-perpetualling ism of the Kennedy-clan. The book can be bought
a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave." plutocracy managed to increase their fortunates for $3.00 from: Freedom Press Publishing Co.,
It is true nations do not act against or for other and control of economic and political power of P.O. Box 462, Miami, Florida 33142 and Council
nations because they love or hate them. Actions the U.S. for Statehood, P.O. Box 1131, North Miami,
are decided on self-interest. But since nations One should recall the groaning of Shylock: Florida 33161.
consist of individuals and so leadership, it re- "You take my life when you take the means Recently a paperback book was published about
mains a question which is the self-interest of whereby I live." Those 200,000 Americans are contemporary economic-political personalities in
the nation, and which is the self-interest of an suffering of the "fear of powerty". To them to the U.S. describing them differently as -their
individual e.g. the hunger for power of a leaders take away their fortunes, means to take away Madison Avenue-made "public image". The book
having the power. by the consent of the governed? their life. That "fear of powerty" e.g. drove can be bought for $1.00 from The Revere Press,
When and how comes the self-interest of the Rockefeller to the point where he was seeking P.O. Box 766 Hamilton, Montana 59840.
leader in conflict with the self-interest of the the U.S. Presidency. Seemingly, he does not trust The NY Times from January 28 to March 28,
nation? History gives us many examples of lead- anymore his frontmen. The American people had 1968 published detailed reports about prisons
ers who betrayed the people. The U.S. is no a good chance to observe the mental dizzyness conditions in Arkansas. One had the impression
exemption. of Rockefeller, when he was not nominated. His by reading them, to read about conditions in
After WW II the U.S. leadership developed an power of the purse lost a battle. Siberian slaves camps.
attitude that the U.S. has the "mission" to ltn- Ferdinand Lundberg is somewhat pessimistic The distinguished U.S. Senator Sam J. Ervin,
pose democracy American style and the "Amer- about changing these conditions. In Menckenes- Jr. from North Carolina, Chairman of the Sub-
ican way of life" (for which no definition exists) que style he thinks the average men are boobs committee On Constitutional Rights of the Com-
on the rest of the world. At present the U.S. gov- and dolts who do not even try to curb the rich mittee of the Judiciary issued a 44-page Report
ernment is overcommitted through international and super-rich. It is true, the average Amer- (90th Congress, 1st Session. Senate, Calender No.
obligations to such an extent, that it is impossible icans so long they have prosperity will remain 519, Report No. 534) under the title "Protecting
to respect anymore those obligations. Since the calm. U.S. leadership maintained since WW II privacy and the rights of federal employees". It
U.S. leadership has not enough courage to ad- an artificial prosperity through "foreign aid" is a report about the tyranny of the U.S. govern-
mit their blunders and through arrogance, they and through continuous "little" wars, but the ment by using prostitute psychiatrists and insane
became the self-appointed policemen of the world. credibility gap is becoming wider and wider. asylums as a dumping place for lifetime without
The roots of this role go back to 1945 when they One should not forget that the very beginning any human rights for those who disagree with
became "drunk with victory-gin" and committed of the downfall of the Roman Empire was caused the U.S. government's policy.
the biggest international crime at Yalta. The by illiterate fishermen, and the very beginning One of the most interesting Report will be
specter of the "Holy Alliance" with Stalin haunts of the Great Russian Revolution was started by published in about October 1968 by the Subcom.
them. Stalin with the aid of his comrades--in- illiterate Moscow housewives. Americans are no mittee on Anti-trust and MMonopoly of the Senate
crime glorified himself as god-on-earth, despite docil sheep!!! Judiciary Committee about the June 1968 hear-
the fact that in the years of 1906-1907 he was Those who eat steaks do not often discuss the ing in regarding to defense contractors' profit
a professional bank-robber. His biggest job was stench of slaughter-houses. The professional so- i.e. those large American manufacturing, bank-
done in Tiflis. The "noble" Americans who par- cial scientists can learn a lot from Lundberg. ing and trading corporations which are making
ticipated in the "Holy Alliance" still are active They do not possess the intellectual honesty what huge profits from cold and hot wars but especial-
in Washington, D.C. They cannot tell the truth Lundberg does. Those who write about steaks ly in Vietnam war.
to the American people. They still carefully hide also must write about slaughter houses. Lund- The Fiat motor company is building a huge
the complete record of the crime at Yalta, which berg did! A spade is a spade! automobile plant in the Soviet Union. This Italian
they committed in 1945. In their desperation they There is another book "The Case against Con- company serves as cover for U.S. companies
try to create another "Holy Alliance" but with gress" by Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson - which are the suppliers of the needed equipments.
poor results. Today, the official leaders of the (473 pp.-1968) Under the Export Control Act, the U.S. Depart-
U.S. the flunkeys of the U.S. imperialists are In this vitally important book, Washington's ment of Commerce is not obliged to publish the
damned if they do, and damned if they don't. boldest reporting team tells an explosive story names of the participating U.S. companies in
Thomas Jefferson said once: "Timid men pre- of the nation's biggest scandal - the misconduct Fiat-Soviet Union ,joint-manufacturing. It will be
fer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of the men and women who are sent to the na- interesting to know, whether the above men-
of liberty." Alexis de Tocqueville 130 years ago tion's capital to write America's laws but who tioned Report will publish them. The NY Times
correctly seized up the American people in his all too often abuse their power and privilege by (June 19, 1968 p.8L.col.1.) already printed the
book "Democracy in America". The enemies of placing their own interests and the interests of first 100 names of U.S. corporations manufactur-
the American people prefer to say that dem- the others ahead of those of the American people. ing and selling under defense contracts to the
ocracy which existed in the U.S. 130 years ago is It is a story that Congress itself has tried to U.S. Armed Forces.
gone with the wind for ever. Nonsense!!! The sweep under the rug for too long now. Here are While on the surface the massproduction tele-
majority of the American people are ready for the Congressional wheeler-dealers who do the vision and radio programmes, the controlled
a head-on-clash with despotism, and when the bidding of their campaign contributors, who paid press, and the prostitute politicians and clergy-
hour will strike there are enough Patrick Henry their payrolls with friends and relatives, who men are serving the American imperialists
and Paul Revere type of Americans to save the use federal public works to reward their allies through Hollywood-inspired manners, under the
U.S. It is true the U.S. Constitution is some- and punish their enemies, who promote their own surface many Americans see clearly, and can-
what battle-worn but still strong enough to help financial interests - and those of their clients not be fooled. This also may apply to the peoples
Americans in their fight against tyranny. Here of their law firms - through their votes at in the Soviet Union but the despotism in the
are some examples. closed-door committee sessions and on the floor Soviet Union does not permit such type of pub-
There is a book on the American market "The of the Congress itself. This is the world where lications as mentioned above. Of course, above
Rich and the Super-Rich" by Ferdinand Lund- conflict-of-interests is a way of life, where pri- publications are unsuitable for the American
berg (812 pp.-1968). vate pleasures and conveniences come before the propaganda machine, e.g. Radio Free Europe.
Thirty years ago Lundberg wrote a book un- national welfare, where the best find themselves Interestingly, those who want to know the
der the title "America's Sixty Families". It told compromised by a venal system - and the worst, truth about the imperialists in Moscow also can
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
 Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
Dean Rusk before the Senate foreign relations
committee on July 10, 1968 as the victory of
American foreign policy.
Former U.S. Senator Paul H. Douglas wrote
a very valuable book under the title "America
in the market place". He does not write about
the "lofty ideals" of socialism or capitalism or
about Jewish-Christian love but about economic-
political matters. It's a down-to-earth approach
to realism. On page 159 he gives interesting de-
tails about the spheres of influences, exactly what
the imperialists deny.
One can easily realize to which extent the im-
perialists are confused. They preach fear about
thermonuclear war and extermination of man-
kind. Whatever they do, they consider it as their
"mission" e.g. Maj. Gen. V. Matsulenko wrote
an article in the "Soviet Military Review" under
the title "The liberating mission of the Soviet
army". They promote the idea of "Holy Alliance"
but they also fight each other. Now in Vietnam,
next time in the Middle East.
A leading U.S. magazine recently had an ad-
vertising: Life, consider the alternative. The
U.S. Post office department stamps a slogan on
letters "Pray for peace". The Pentagon - ac-
cording to Chinese propaganda - has another
slogan: kill all, burn all, destroy all.
Life, consider the alternative. Extermination
of mankind, including the imperialists? It's un-
thinkable! They want to live and not to die!
8) Red China. Not all roads are leading to
Moscow. Peking is taking over the role of Mos-
cow as leader of Marxism-Leninism.
On October 10, 1911 the Chinese people under
the leadership of Sun Yat-sen did overthrow the
rule of the Ching-dynasty, and with that act
put an end to China's feudal monarchy which
lasted over 2,000 years. In September 1949 Mao
Tse-tung solemnly declared: "The Chinese, form-
ing one-quarter of mankind, have stood up." The
fight of the Chinese people which lasted for about
a century stopped not only domestic feudalism but
also foreign imperialism, economic stagnation
and social imperialism. The forces of Mao Tse-
tung returned to the Chinese people, their na-
tional identity and pride. A great country and
a great people started moving ahead in every
respect.
Napoleon once said: "Let China sleep, when
she awakes the world will be sorry." The im-
perialists are already sorry. Few American lead-
ers as Vice President Humphrey had the courage
to speak publicly about the necessity of an Amer-
ican-Chinese understanding. Red China is not
anymore a "living carcass" as the Western Eu-
ropean imperialists called it in the last century.
It is anticipated that by 1970 Red China will
have about 100 H-bombs and by 1973 it will have
rockets capable of hitting targets at the West
coast.
At present the American and Societ propa-
ganda machines still make mockery out of Red
China by considering their trend as grotesque,
tragicomic, absurd, fascist, racist and so on and
so forth. Indeed, judged by Western standards,
it is strange, how the thoughts of Mao Tse-tung
can help someone to win a ping-pong contest
or doctors to remove a 100 lbs. tumor from the
abdomen of a woman. But a careful study of the
selected works of Mao Tse-tung and the Chinese
philosophers and writers Lu Hsun and Lao Tzu
enables one to understand the 700,000,000 "blue
ants" by Chinese standards. Indeed, they are
on the right track by Chinese standards. It is
very possible that in some years the American
yellow journals will print "sensational" articles
about the "Chinese miracle". The manipulators
of American Massenver blodung are often com-
pelled to use methods of the Dark Middle Ages.
Those who are against Soviet imperialism and
the "Holy Alliance" of the two superpowers
should only welcome the trend in Red China. One
concept of the Massenverblodung is of course the
"yellow danger". The false prophets armed with
quotations of the bible are spreading fear that
the Chinese once will overrun the whole world.
The Zionists in the U.S. are the chief spokes-
men for the crusade against Red China, since
they sense a danger to their dreams to rule once
the world from Jerusalem. The Zionists are
also the leaders of those "anti-communist" move-
ment which prevented the UN-membership of
Red China. Interestingly the "yellow danger"
was once applied to the Japanese, now the Chin.
find the answer right here in the U.S. in a book
"Stalinist corruption of Marxism-A study in
Machiavellian duplicity" (125 pp.-1940) written
by Arnold Petersen a socialist following the
teaching of Daniel De Leon. Lenin had great
respect for De Leon.
What Khrushchev "exposed" in 1956, Mr. Pet-
erson exposed in 1940 while the U.S. government
already started the "Holy Alliance" with that
bank-robber Stalin, whom President Truman
called: good old Joe!!!
And now, let's see the Soviet-American im-
perialists handcuffed together. Here I have to
use the "stick-language" since the "carrots-lan-
guage" cannot describe the imperialists.
In European but especially in French political
circles the opinion prevails that the U.S. and the
Soviet Union are in a secret alliance which orig-
inated at Yalta, continued at Camp David and
further kept alive in Glassboro. According to this
assumption both superpowers divided the world
in spheres of influence for the purpose of eco-
nomic exploitation. There is little doubt about
it, if and when these two superpowers and their
despotic leaders once really arrived to a success-
ful cooperation, human freedom and rights would
be extinct as the dodo. But will they be true al-
lies? Here are some thoughts how and why,
they NEVER will be true allies.
1) Co-existence between the American eco-
nomic-political system called capitalism and the
Soviet economic-political system called socialism
is impossible, because the Constitutions of the
two superpowers are diametrically opposed on
irreconcilable principles. The acceptance of the
principles of the Soviet Constitution in the U.S.
would lead to a total economic-social collapse of
the U.S., and vice versa. The "Holy Alliance"
during WW II was based not on principles but on
temporary expediency. L. I. Brezhnev put it flat-
ly in his speech on March 29, 1968 at the Moscow
city party conference: "Our party has always
warned that in ideological field there can be no
peaceful coexistence, just as there can be no
class between proletariat and bourgeoise." Eco-
nomic-political competitive co-existence excluding
all military actions should be promoted, however.
2) The formation of power-centers and division
of spheres of influence for the purpose of ex-
ploitation, i.e. the subjugation of men by men
is nothing new in the history of world. But his-
tory teaches us, when empires have divided the
world between themselves and arrived to the
saturation point, then they have the tendency
to divide one another. Paraphrased it differently,
they become cannibalistic. A careful study of
American-Soviet relations since WW II reveals
such cannibalistic attitude, e.g. when Eisenhower
one of the most docil puppet of the American
monopolists invited Khrushchev to the U.S. and
he, like other "noble" Americans were bowing
their heads and bending themselves before
Khrushchev like abject servants, in the true men-
tality of abject servants, they also sent U-2 re-
connaissance planes over the Soviet Union. On
the other hand, despite the grinning and hand-
shaking and babykissing of Soviet diplomats at
cocktail parties in the U.S. the Soviet UN-MiS-
sion remains the biggest spyorganization for the
Soviet Union in the U.S.
3) In Vietnam the Soviet-American imperial-
ists are realizing that they are sinking in quick-
sand. They both are losing face and are desperate
to find a way out. They act now, like malicious
beasts after being trapped and trying to save
their hides.
4) Great will be the day, when the war is
over in Vietnam! The prostitute politicians will
praise their masters, and the prostitute clergy-
men will ring-the churchbells. The imperialists
will be described as the benefactors of man-
kind, but .. .
'5) Very few suspects, Vietnam is not the last
war. The imperialists are already carefully pre-
paring the Israeli-Arab war in the Middle-East.
This time not for a Blitzkrieg but for a long,
long war. The Soviet union will be with the
Arabs, the U.S. with Israel and the Zionists in
the U.S.
The Jews in Europe but especially in Eastern
Europe know by experience that Zionism means
to them the same disaster as Nazism did to the
Germans. The American Jews do not know yet
the true nature of Zionism. When European Jews
were fed into ovens, the Zionists i.e. Jewish
Nazis in the U.S. had deaf ears to their cries.
Many Zionists were willing collaborators with
the Gestapo. There is a fully documented book
in the U.S. "Perfidy" written by the late prom-
inent Jew, Ben Hecht. The book is out of print,
and suppressed by the Zionists.
There are few Jews who really believe that
they are God's chosen people and once they will
rule the world from Jerusalem. That's all religi-
ous hogwash. The great majority of Jews all over
the world but especially in the U.S. do not regard
Israel as their home. The Zionist controlled Amer-
ican press certainly do not admit that ten thou-
sands of Jews returned from Israel. But more
and more people including Jews know that Israel
is established to protect the interests of the U.S.
monopolies in the Middle East which have a cap-
ital investment there of $2,000-million and a
yearly net profit of $1,200-million, in other words
the U.S. monopolies make 60%r- yearly interest!
The interests of the Zionists in the U.S.; are
protected by the "Anti-Defamation League" of
the "B'nai B'rith".
According to a report (NY Times, July 24,
1968 p.17.L.col.14-6) 62%~, of Americans expect
a war between Israel and the Arab countries
within the next five years. 77% does not want
to help Israel, and 83%i% the Arabs. 9%i% want to
help Israel, and 2%Jc the Arabs. One should remem-
ber the often repeated statement of Ben Gurion:
"You cannot be an American and a Jew."
6) There are many interesting "feelers" to
which extent the imperialists can come to the
public with the idea of the "Holy Alliance", e.g.
an essay, titled "Thoughts on progress, peaceful
co-existence and intellectual freedom" by Prof.
Andrei D. Sakharov, the "father" of the Soviet
H-bomb. The essay was not printed publicly in the
Soviet Union. It was designed to be printed only
abroad with the tacit consent of the Soviet lead-
ers. The NY Times published it in full on July
22, 1968. Indeed, the essay is a remarkable
masterpiece for the benefit of the Soviet Union.
Prof. Sakharov admits that his "views were
formed in the milieu of the scientific-technological
intelligentsia", hence first of all Prof. Sakharov
belongs to the Soviet ruling class, and as such he
lost contact with the working class and peasants.
This is very natural also through the fact that he
has been a participant of the Pugwash con-
ferences which were promoted and under the
leadership of the Canadian-born American pluto-
crat Cyrus S. Eaton. Eaton won the Lenin-Prize,
since he never misses an opportunity to glorify
the Soviet Union.
The essay is written in a very eloquent language,
with honey on his lips but murder in his heart,
as the Chinese saying goes. While he writes about
the "lofty idealism of socialism", he repeats an
old trick of the bolsheviks. He proposes a 20'0
tax de facto to be paid by the American tax-
payers which tax would help to establish world-
wide Soviet-style "socialism". If Americans ever
will accept this blueprint of Soviet world leader-
ship, indeed, they reduce themselves to a huge
crowd of splendid idiots!
7) Promoters of the U.S.-Soviet "Holy Al-
liance" like Prof. Sakharov claim that the con-
verge of the superpowers are inevitable, other-
wise there will be a thermonuclear war which
means the extermination of mankind. They are
right, - IF -there would be such war! But
thanks God, mankind also includes the Amer-
ican and Western billionaires, millionaires, pri-
vate bankers and the Soviet intelligentsia and
so on and so forth. The American and Soviet im-
perialists do not want to exterminate themselves,
hence there will be no thermonuclear war. The
propaganda about the extermination of mankind
is, however, a necessity for both ruling classes.
In the Soviet Union they can rule with the aid
of K.G.B. terror, in the U.S. they can exploit
the American people through taxation. Fortunate-
ly by now, the wind blows in the face of the im-
perialist. The wheel of time is grinding them
slowly and thoroughly. While biting each other
like mad dogs, the "Holy Alliance" remains only
in propaganda.
One proof of the non-selfextermination policy
of the superpowers is the "Treaty on the non-
proliferation of nuclear weapons", also signed by
the two superpowers on July 1, 1968. It was
hailed by L. I Brezhnev at the Soviet-Hungarian
friendship rally in Moscow on July 3, 1968 as
the victory of Leninist foreign policy, and by
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
 Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
September, 1968
ese are the bogeymen. One should know Red
China has no foreign debt, even the Soviet debts
are paid. In Red China the Zionist influence is
zero!
In Red China Marxism-Leninism is not a dogma
but a guide for action through the endless re-
petition of the process: coming from the masses
and going to the masses. They prefer historical
materialism to idealism and metaphysics.
J. A. Hobson, British economist wrote a defini-
tion about imperialism in 1902: "Imperialism is
the endeavour of the great controllers of industry
to broaden the channels for the flow of their
surplus wealth by seeking foreign markets and
foreign investments to take off the goods and
capital they cannot sell or use at home." That
definition does not apply to Red China.
Red China's emergence as a world power is
one of the best assurances against the Soviet-
American "Holy Alliance". The trend in Red
China once more proves the effectiveness of the
Natural Law.
And now, let's compare the imperialists from
an other point.
How the ruling class in the Soviet Union
prevents criticising their wisdom. The answer
is simple: brutal force: prison, Siberia, insane
asylum or death. The courts of "justice" are
only windowdressing.
But how are conditions in the U.S.? Indeed,
there is political freedom in the U.S. There is
d
no K.G.B. in America. One can say anything an
write anything in the U.S. but the F.B.I. doe
not listen. They let everyone alone. Same applies
to the C.I.A. (There are many Americans who
do not let the C.I.A. alone.) Some judges are
crooked as e.g. well explained in the book "The
Bench is warped" by Alvin H. Gershenson. But
for every crooked judge - often judges are sent
to jail too - the majority of judges do their
best to render equal justice under law. How then
the ruling class is ruling Americans?
The answer is the I.R.S., the internal revenue
service or as often said: the tax-office. The Amer-
ican imperialists control the U.S. Congress which
makes the laws for I.R.S. Americans with no tar
little property seldom are effective against the
imperialists. Those who have property, either
belong to the imperialists in various ways and
of course do not fight against them. You can
not bite the hand which feeds you, as the saying
goes. Those who have property and decide an
open fight, will soon feel the iron hand of I.R.S.
and their property will not last too long.
All Americans know, that at I.R.S. Uncle Sam
is dead and is replaced by Uncle Shylock since
1913 when Congress voted for the federal in-
come tax. The voting was one of the worst
swindle in the American history.
I.R.S. can make the most pre,;osterous claim
against anyone, and then force him to disprove
it. If he can not disprove it - as in most cases
, then I.R.S. can seize any U.S. citizen's home.
automobile, bank account or any property or
source of income without offering the slightest
proof that he actually owns taxes. Yet I.R.S.
through the media of Massenverblodung suc-
ceeded in past years to make believe that those
who became their victims are unpatrioting Amer-
icans. In this respect "Reader's Digest" per-
formed a good service to the American people by
printing the articles of John Barron in August
1967 issue under the title "Tyranny in the In-
ternal Revenue Service" and in the September
1968 issue under the title "Time for reform in
the IRS".
The trend in the U.S. calls for more and more
taxes. I.R.S. of the federal government set a
good example for state and city government,
and American citizens became with all their po-
licital freedom the most overtaxed people of the
world. To make matters worse, they see that their
tax-money is used in such ways and for such
purposes which are against the American peo-
ple's interests. Very possibly an open clash be-
tween the U.S. government and the American
people will occur, because of taxation. That's
the way the U.S. started in 1773 with the Boston
tea party against the British government, and
that's the way Americans may end their own
freely elected government.
The U.S. is a good example that political free-
dom without economic freedom has little value.
Chief justice John Marshall correctly stated in
the case McCulloch vs. Maryland on March 6,
1819: "The power to tax includes the power to
destroy."
More details about Red China in "Alkoto Ma-
gyar" of September 1967. on pp.1-7 and p.16.
Col..
And now, let's turn to the American people.
In many countries, perhaps in most countries,
peoples have little or no understanding about
and for the American people. Let's take freedom
at first.
President Johnson said on July 8, 1968: "Free-
dom to speak, freedom to listen, the full and open
right to communicate and to reason together are
essential to our fulfillment as individuals." Nice
talk, indeed. President Johnson is not the first
U.S. President who talked nicely. What Presi-
dent Johnson did not say is: you Americans have
the right to speak, and we the U.S. government
have the right not to listen, and even if we listen,
we will do what we think is right. That's what
actually happens in the U.S.
Chief Justice Earl Warren said on July 5,
1968: "For a long, long time we have swept un-
er the rug a number of problems that are basic
American life. They have piled up."
Originally the judiciary was designed as the
eakest of the branches of the U.S. government,
ut with a do-nothing or do-wrong Congress and
a do-wrong Administration, the judiciary be-
came the strongest branch.
One may ask of course, why the American peo-
ple permits all this since they have their polit-
ical freedom? Are there not enough patriots like
in 1773? Is there something wrong with Amer-
icans???
L. I. Brezhnev at the Soviet-Hungarian friend-
ship rally at Moscow on July 3, 1968 claimed,
that the "Great Society" is a rotting, degrading
and disintegrating society. It is a fact that in
the U.S. since 1960, the rate of crime is up to
88% or 9 times more than the population growth.
One rape occurs every 21 minutes and a mugging
in every 2 minutes. One must only turn on a
television set to see how crime is glorified.
Last year in racial riots 84 Americans were
slaughtered and 1,950 injured with 16,471 ar-
rests and more than $160 million in property
damage. And yet, looters and arsonists are cod-
dled, kowtowed and rewarded by corrupt po-
liticians and clergymen, while the police remained
handcuffed. Major General Archibald Sproul re-
signed his National Guard Commission with the
following statement: "Our soldiers were not
only told that they could not load their weapons,
but they were told that they could not even use
their rifles as clubs to protect themselves or stop
looting." The streets of large cities are not any-
more safe even in day time. Why free Americans
permit this?
Why Americans considered to send abroad the
U.S. Armed Forces allegedly in defense of their
homeland in WW I & WW II? Why Americans
permitted the U.S. government - which is free-
ly elected by them - to establish about 3,000
military installations all over the world and be-
come the self-appointed policeman of the world?
Why the God-fearing Americans permitted the
slaughter of more than 30,000 Americans the
best sons of America? Why they permit killing
the innocent people of Vietnam, burning their
homes and destroying that little property what
they have? Why Americans permitted that their
prestige all over the world sunk to the level of
Nazi-Germany or Stalinist Soviet Union?
Here are some answers.
For centuries the U.S. have been protected by
the Atlantic and Pacific oceans against foreign
invasion. The U.S. Founding Fathers learned
from history. They included in the U.S. Constitu-
tion all those factors which were building up a
country and excluded those factors which destroy-
ed countries.
At the beginning of the century the Western
European colonial empires became restless.
Through their conflict of interest and by their
cannibalistic nature a showdown was prepared.
The events in Russia made matters even more
complicated. These circumstances gave a splendid
opportunity for greedy American profiteers, and
they sold the idea to the American people, that
their country is in danger and it is the duty
of Americans to "make the world safe for dem-
ocracy" with a "war to end all wars". Led by
a
Page 5
noble motives the American people decided to
interfere in other nations' internal affairs by
armed forces. The point of no return was passed!
The American opportunists having made their
huge profits became imperialists. Through deceit
right after WW I they sowed the seeds of WW II.
They found a maniac by the name of Adolf Hitler
to start WW II. The majority of the American
people did not want to participate in WW 11.
The fiction of the "four freedoms" and other
slogans were not sufficient for Americans to
enter WW II, so they had to be pushed in. Pearl
Harbor did it. On December 7, 1941 very few
Americans even thought, that they have been
betrayed by their own government.
Then came the victory and the big-sellout at
Yalta where the signatures of F.D.R. and that
of the bank-robber Stalin served the same pur-
pose. F.D.R. not only sold out Eastern Europe
but also the U.S. The Yalta agreement was an
international crime committed by governments.
Compared to that crime, the crimes of the Mafia
and Cosa Nostra are only kindergarten-plays.
Today in Vietnam not Europeans but Americans
are slaughtered. The roots of Vietnam are ' at
Yalta.
After WW II of course the Soviet-American
alliance outlived its purpose. Americans were
told that the U.S. became the last citadel of
freedom and as such must help the "good guys"
all over the world. Mr. & Mrs. America firmly
believed in Main Street that the "foreign aid"
billions of their tax-money help the "good guys"
abroad which, however, included the most cor-
rupt government exploiting peoples. Americans
are against the "bad guys" who always are
the communists.
Since Americans do not listen to foreign broad-
casts and do not read publications from abroad,
especially not from the socialist camp, they could
not realize, that the "good guys" government
only help the communists, since exactly the corn-
munists can tell the peoples that Americans are
supporting their corrupt government. And so,
the "foreign aid" made nothing but enemies to
the U.S. Correctly the -peoples-,of various coun-
tries claim Americans are responsible for their
government, after all there is political freedom
in the U.S.!
While the "good guys" and "bad guys" concept
costs billions of taxmoney, Americans realized
that the U.S. government remained idle when it
was necessary to act against the communists
economically and politically (not with military
force) in such cases as June 1953 in East-Berlin,
July 1956 in Posnan, Poland, October-November
1956 in Hungary and in August 1968 in Czecho-
slovakia. Except do-nothing promises, say-nothing
words and false crocodile tears, the U.S. gov-
ernment (lid nothing.
William C. Bullitt, once American Ambassador
to France said on August 18, 1940: "The prob-
lems of world affairs have become so complex,
in this day of volcanic changes, that the average
citizen has the greatest difficulty in understanding
them and judging what is the best for this coun-
try, before it is too late". That remarks was cor-
rect in 1940 and even more correct in 1968.
Rating poor in foreign languages, having not
the true facts of life abroad and preoccupied with
domestic problems, it is safe to say, the majority
of Americans are rather confused about the in-
ternational situation, e.g. they can not grasp how
the spyship was grabbed by North Koreans. The
case of the Pueblo remains a mystery to most
Americans.
There are various types of American, of cour,,c.
Some of them believe in their "god". By pray-
ing, they say: Oh Lord ! Almighty U.S. Dollar. ..
They have three things on their mind: dollars,
dollars, and more dollars. -
Some Americans have lost all their faith. They
think, that Armageddon is just around the cor-
ner, and only the reappearance of Jesus Christ
can save America (including the dollar) and
the rest of the world (after the U.S.).
Some Americans are fighting against "the in-
ternational communist conspiracy" and selling
signs of "Impeach Earl Warren" (the Chief,
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court).
And then there are the hippies, yippies, beatniks
and flapniks. They hate everything and every-
body, but most of all: The Soap!
While some of those Americans are getting
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
 Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
Page 6
a lot of publicity concerning the economic-polit-
ical life in the U.S. they amount to little or
nothing.
Bernard Shaw once wisely remarked : "A
healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality
as a healthy man of his bones. But if you break
a nation's nationality it will think of nothing
else but getting it set again."
Same applies to freedom. Americans never
were slaves or serfs. The acid test was not yet
made. Presently rather confused but still calm
and calculating Americans are not easily bluffed
either by the American or Soviet imperialists.
The rugged truth always triumphs over illusions
and deceit. The Patrick Henry and Paul Revere
type of Americans are here. The platform of
the Liberty Party of 1843: "When freemen un-
sheathe the sword, it should be to strike for
Liberty, not for despotism" still prevails. Amer-
icans did realized, they have been betrayed, and
now they are cautious. The claim that the Amer-
ican society is on its deathbed exist only in the
mind of the enemies of Americans. Perhaps,
Americans still need some more "bone-breaking",
more insults against their nationality and free-
dom, perhaps they had or having enough already.
The resistence to the gun control is significant.
Such control will not stop or even reduce crime,
solong TV-programs glorify crime. And besides
that in an open clash it means nothing. Hunga-
rians did not fight the 'tyrants in 1956 with
"bare hands" but with the guns of the Hungarian
Armed Forces. It is not the gun which decides
the victory but the spirit which handles the gun!
The most important cause of internal problems
of the U.S. - which are well exploited by the
enemies of the Americans - is the misunderstnd-
ing of the concept of equality based on the Decla-
ration of Independence, that: "All men art creat-
ed equal. They are endowed by their creator with
certain inherent and inalianable rights ...".
The original text of Thomas Paine reads: "All
men are created equal and independent: That
from that equal creation they derive rights in-
herent and inalianable". This statement is un-
equivocal. It is political truism. We are all born
equal, politically. From both a social and philo-
sophical point of view, the statement is incon-
trovertible. And when Thomas Paine wrote that
sentence he had in mind that kings and royalty
were not born, superior to other people. There
was no divine right in the political philosophy of
Thomas Paine. To simplify the statement, it
meant equality before the law : not equality in
person.
For those who do not believe in God, the state-
ment of the Declaration of Independence has no
meaning, since.those rights originate from God.
Those who believe in God, know that life is based
on the Natural Law where the fittest survive.
That is proved by the history of the world.
Solon, the lawgiver 2,500 years ago laid down
the maxim that "equality causes no war". Those
who believe in equality sooner or later will real-
ize that others believe in un-equality and ultimate-
ly will be subjugated. The struggle between
masters and slaves will go on forever !
The struggle over the concept of equality on
individual, national and international level caused
problems since ages. In Ancient Greece Aristotle
was wrestling with it, in his work of "Politics".
He found no solution. In Athene seemingly they
found a solution. Legally all citizens were equal,
but reality only the 90,000 citizens with property,
the rest of 500,000 Athenians were slaves and
were considered no citizens at all.
About 2,300 years later James Madison (The
Federalist; Other Writings of James Madison
Vo.IV.) tried to solve the problem of unequality.
He found no solution.
Some vote-chasing politicians and money-chas-
ing clergymen hope to solve that problem by
race-mixing. The results are race-riots in the
U.S. The human and material damage caused
by race-riots in 1968 is worse than in 1967. Years
ago the blackman in the U.S. had many friends
amongst whiteman. By now they have more
enemies. The whiteman knows his taxmoney sup-
ports the leaders of the race-riots. The leaders
of the two major political parties, the Tweedle-
dum Party and the Tweedledee Party are accus-
ing each other, while Americans know well, basi-
cally there is no difference between them. They
both are serving the interests of the American
imperialists. The water in the American kettle
is boiling and steaming. The steam is artifically
suppressed, so long the kettle will blow up. And
that is what the Soviet imperialists are wait-
ing for.
On the other hand the Soviet kettle is even in
worse condition than its American counterpart.
Prague was not the equivalence of Chicago. The
Soviet kettle already is blowing up, and that's
what Peking is waiting for. The Chinese are no
race-mixers, neither in Red China nor in the
U.S. or elsewhere. They know what they want,
and they are going to get it. Farseeing American
leaders do some serious thinking about the im-
proving of relations with Red China, instead of
the Soviet Union. One difficulty is the member-
ship of Red China at the United Nations. Already
Peking claims, the UN needs Red China more,
than Red China the UN. Time is changing fast
in our days !
Speaking of un-equality on international level
in East-West relations it is interesting to com-
pare the historic events of Hungary in 1956 and
the historic events of Czechoslovakia in 1968.
In 1956 the American-Soviet imperialists were
looking for another "little" war, i.e. anything
but WW III. Prof. Zbigniew Brezinski, director
,of the Columbia University's Research Institute
on Communist Affairs correctly stated the pos-
sibility of a Hungarian civil war in 1956 (NY
Times 8/22/68 p.20L+col.8) Janos Kadar pre-
vented the "little" war in Hungary. In 1968,
there is no need for "little" war. There is Viet-
nam.
In 1956 Hungarians like all other Eastern
Europeans believed in the "liberation" promises
of the Eisenhower-Dulles clique as were told
them through Radio Free Europe. Then the hour
stroke on October 23, 1956 and the "champions
of freedom" the U.S. government stood still.
The hypocrisy of the U.S. government was ex-
posed. Cowardly they pushed the whole matter
to the UN which kept on debating. The editorial
of the Wall Street Journal stated on December 11,
1956: "The Soviet world, at any rate, will never
be the same as was before October 23, 1956."
The Slovaks and the Czechs, like anyone else,
learned from the events in 1956. In 1968 they
expected nothing from the U.S. or the UN.
Janos Kadar saved Hungary in 1956 to become
a Vietnam. It was a brutal action but like a sur-
geon he knew it is better to lose a limb than the
whole body. Vietnam is more brutal than the
Soviet onslaught against Hungary in 1956. The
onslaught, nevertheless, remains unjustified by
Western moral and legal standards, and also ac-
cording to the teaching of Marxism and Lenin-
ism. In 1968 there was no need for a Janos Kadar
in Czechoslovakia.
The Slovaks and Czechs argued with the in-
vading Soviet troops in Russian language. There
was no fighting, only 100-300 deaths. Writing
about Czechs and Slovaks "Pravda" of August
22, 1968 stated : ". , . the century-old traditions
of Slav affinity ..." There is no Hungarian af-
finity to the Soviet Union. Hungarians belong
to the great family of Turanian peoples. They
are not Slavs. Hungarians did not argue with
the Soviet troops but actually defeated the Soviet
armed forces which occupied Hungary at that
time. Not with their "bare hands" but with Sov-
iet-made guns in full cooperation with the Hun-
garian Armed Forces. About 30,000 Hungarians
died in that battle.
Some professional Western observers (NY
Times of 9/10/68 p.1. col.2-4 & p.16.col.1.) glori-
fied the invasion of Czechoslovakia by Soviet
armed forces as a "brilliantly and faultlessly
executed military operation", and a "million-man
magnitude". They also claim "The Soviet force
employed in the intervention in Hungary in 1956
was both considerably smaller and much less ad-
vanced than what Moscow sent to Czechoslova-
kia in 1968".
The facts are that in 1956 the brainless bullies
in Moscow never in their worst nightmare fore-
saw the dead communist bodies dangling on the
lampposts of Budapest. The Hungarian people
used the element of surprise and completely de-
feated those Soviet armed forces which were oc-
cupying Hungary. In 1968 Moscow's leadership
of Marxism-Leninism in bad shape through Red
China, they tried to regain some of past "glories".
Therefore, after a careful preparation of six
months they invaded Czechoslovakia by knowing
September, 1968.
well that : a) The Slovaks and Czechs will not
fight; b) the U.S. remains an idle onlooker. The
invasion of Czechoslovakia remains the "magni-
tude" of frantic and desperate bullies. And those
"professional Western observers" who try to
glorify the shameful action of the Soviet armed
forces remain as phony as three-dollar bills.
The "observation" no doubt intends to create
fear for those who are against Soviet imperial--
ism. Indirectly it is, another form of promotion
for the "Holy Alliance".
In 1956 Imre Nagy (not to be confused with
Ferenc Nagy, a traitor paid by Radio Free Eu-
rope) wanted to withdraw from the Warsaw
Treaty and did establish a genuine multi-party
democracy in Hungary which lasted to November
4, 1956. Imre Nagy was executed by the Soviet'
imperialists.
In 1968 Alexander Dubcek said, that the "al-
liance with the Soviet Union is the alpha and
omega of our foreign policy," for which he was
arrested, beaten and humiliated. The Soviet im-
perialists recognize only complete subjugation.
Reporting about Czech refugees in Austria,
the NY Times writes 8/31/68 p.2.L+ col.6+7) :
". . . is fairly well dressed, drives his own car .. .
He is unlike the 200,000 ragged and desperate
individuals who fled from Hungary 12 years
ago . . ." About 80,000 of those "ragged and des-
perate" Hungarians already returned to Hun-
gary. There were some Hungarians who arrived
in car in Austria, e.g. the fascist-stalinist crim-
inal Monsignor Bela Varga who is on the pay-
roll of Radio Free Europe serving well the in-
terests of the American imperialists AND the
Vatican.
One may suspect the tacit approval of the U.S.
government for the events in 1956 and in 1968.
In 1956 it was Hungary with not the best rela-
tions to the U.S. In 1968 in the U.S. many leaders
saw in Czechoslovakia one of the principal sup-
plier of arms to North Vietnam.
The U.S. government under the Administra-
tion of President Truman returned the gold of
the Hungarian National Bank-which they seized
after WW II-to the stalinist criminal-regime of
Rakosi-Gero. It did not happened in the case of
Czechoslovakia. Fortunately, the U.S. did not
return the St. Stephan's Crown.
In the American emigration, there are few
Czechs and Slovaks participating in anti-com-
munist activities. Those who protested during
August 1968 were mostly American-born citizens.
The Hungarian emigration has strong anticom-
munist groups, yet they became totally ineffec-
tive, because their leaders have been the pretend-
ers and dissemblers of the semi-dictatorship of
Horthy regime, opportunists, and fascist and/or
stalinist criminals of Nazi resp. Stalinist regime.
The so-called Hungarian Committee under the
leadership of arch-criminal Monsignor Bela Var-
ga is paid by Radio Free Europe. That so-called
private organization in service of the American
imperialists nipped in bud all genuine attempts
of Hungarians as well as in the emigration to
improve the U.S.-Hungarian relations. Not by
force of course, but through the power of the
purse and hypocrisy Those bandits of the so-
called Hungarian Committee intend to "liberate"
Hungary. The chief bandit is Monsignor Bela
Varga. Next to him is Maj. Gen. Bela Kiraly, a
nazi warcriminal.
There is a big difference between Hungary and
Czechoslovakia. Historic Hungary was dismem-
bered after WW I through the dictate of Trianon
by the Western European colonial powers and
the tacit approval of the U.S. Hungary lost two-
third of its territory and population, e.g. Transyl-
vania which was an integral part of Historic
Hungary for 900 years was "given" to Rumania.
Czechoslovakia also benefited. In order to "jus-
tify" the dictate of Trianon the West felt com-
pelled to defame and slander Hungarians in every
conceivable ways. In 1956 the West rather em-
barassed by the Hungarian events, praised the
Hungarians. In 1968 the Slovaks but especially
the Czechs from the point of propaganda had
no difficulties in the West.
In 1956 there was absolutely no anti-semitism
in Hungary, despite the facts that about 800
of the Rakosi-Gero Stalinist criminal regime con-
sisted of the Jews. The Jews in Hungary (about
100,000 of the 10,000,000 Hungarians) were also
against the Rakosi-Gero regime.
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
 Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
September, 1968
Very little is known about the "triangle", i.e.
the interlocking connections between: 1) Hun-
garian revolt, 2) Israel's aggression against
Egypt, 3) U.S. Presidential election.
There are 14,000 Jews in Czechoslovakia out
of 14 million Czechs and Slovaks. In 1968 was no
anti-semitism in Czechoslovakia but all sign in-
dicate Zionism was involved.
In 1956 the traight head-on-clash with the Sov-
iet Union temporarily failed. The "social scient-
ists", "Kremlinologists" and other "experts"
claimed Hungarians committed a mistake. In
1968 the Czechs and Slovaks used a different ap-
proach, the Good Soldier Schweik method, result-
ing in surrender by the 14 points e.g. that Czecho-
slovakia's political course "be changed in ac-
cordance with the Soviet type of socialism".
In certain respects 1956 and 1968 created sim-
ilarities. The Hungarian people like the Slovaks
and the Czechs consider the Soviet troops as oc-
cupation troops, and the Soviet Union as an op-
pressor. In 1956 Hungary and in 1968 Czechoslo-
vakia became the paradise for opportunitists, trai-
tors and puppets of Moscow. Having abandoned
ture Marxism-Leninism and following the path
of imperialism the Soviet leaders have no other
choice then do what they did in 1956 and in
1968: betraying Marx and Lenin!
There are few written definitions in the West
about opportunists. The best definition was writ-
ten by V. I. Lenin, as reproduced in "Alkoto
Magyar" of September 1967 (p.9.col.2.). That
definition can be applied to all opportunists every-
where and at any time.
Concerning Soviet imperialism related to Hun-
gary the motions of two distinguished U.S. Sen-
ators should be mentioned.
According to U.S. Congressional Records of
August 31, 1960, p.18785, col.1+2, Congressman
Michael Feighan from Ohio, the U.S. State De-
partment sent a telegramme to Tito of Yugosla-
via on Friday, November 2, 1956 with the follow-
ing text: "The government of the United States
does not look with favor upon governments un-
friendly to the Soviet Union on the borders of
the Soviet Union." Senator Frank J. Lausche
from Ohio requested the U.S. State Departrreiit
to clarify this alleged statement. On June 20,
1963 Frederick G. Dutton, Assistant Secreta
of State replied in a two-page letter stating tha
"No such message was sent". Who is telling the
truth? Or, maybe did the C.I.A. send such
message???
Senator Vance Hartke from Indiana, on July
15, 1968 proposed to offer a haven for Cardinal
Mindszenty in the U.S. Cardinal Mindszenty is
the living symbol of unconditional and uncom-
promising resistance against all tyrannies. His
spirit is as unbroken as before. It is a mistake,
however, to think Cardinal Mindszenty has great
sympathy for the U.S. The U.S. Embassy in Bu-
dapest, de facto is his prison. It is a big ques-
tion, whether his writings ever will be published
as actually he wrote them. If Cardinal Mind-
szenty could leave his prison in Budapest in such
dignity which he deserves, based on the respect
and admiration of all freedom loving peoples,
then Senator Hartke's proposition should be sup-
ported by all means.
Cardinal Mindszenty always kept Bela Varga
in contempt, yet Bela Varga pretends to have
the same ideas as Cardinal Mindszenty. While
Cardinal Mindszenty suffered from Nazi as well
as Stalinist tyrannies, Bela Varga that Mephisto-
pheles, a stooge of the Zionists and imperialists
served both the Nazis and the Stalinists. Yet
Lela Varga, who is responsible for Law VII. in
jungary which was used against Cardinal Mind-
nty by the Rakosi-Gero Moscow puppets Sta-
linist gangsters, still informs the American public
about his "anti-communist" feelings, e.g. on
August 21, 1968 during a television appearance.
Varga is responsible for the murder of thousands
and thousands of innocent true Hungarians.
At this point one may ask: what all the fore-
going has to do with East-West trade, and the
establishment of the Federation of Eastern Eu-
ropean Countries?
Here are the answers: 1) politics is nothing
but the concentrated form of economics. It is
unrealistic to consider East-West trade purely
from commercial point of view' 2) through in-
terlocking connections one problem can not be
detached from the other. Economic, national, in-
ternational, religious and racial matters are in-
fluencing each other, according to the skill, talents
and effectiveness of the leaders. A narrow-
minded rigid attitude in international matters
simply is out-of-date. It's passe. The world did
not shrink together. It remained the same size
but there are all kind of advancements. One can
not say anymore, that such and such country is
far away, hence out of interests. There is no
country far away anymore. One must take the
whole world as a unit, and handle it as it is, not
as one thinks, it should be!
But what is the role of Eastern European coun-
tries in this world? And, what will be? One must
consider the past in order to understand the
present and calculate the future.
In the past Western European colonial empires
used the Eastern European countries as a protec-
tive belt against the invasions of the East e.g.
the Mongol and 'Ottoman empire. Fomenting reli-
gious, national differences and hatred, they pre-
vented any type of unity. Divide and rule was
their method. They succeeded for centuries. By
now, the colonial empires disappeared and two
powers the Soviet Union and Red China emerged.
The whiteman is hated all over the world because
of Western European colonialism and their U.S.
support. Eastern Europeans never were colonial
exploiters. This facts already have been well ex-
ploited by Eastern European traders by pro-
moting commerce in former colonial countries.
But there are more possibilities for Eastern
Europeans. In the beginning of this century
Western European imperialists became cannibal-
istic and destroyed themselves. At our present
the two superpowers demonstrate the same can-
nibalism for the benefit of the world. Since 1911
with the defeat of the Ching dynasty in China,
and 1917 with the defeat of the Romanoff dyn-
asty in Russia the center of gravity if internation-
al powerpolitics moved toward the East. The fu-
ture of Eastern Europeans are in the East, not in
he West. The West still considers Eastern Euro-
ean countries as a safety belt. 1956 and 1968
re the best proofs of this observation.
The West through hypocrisy under the cloak
of Jewish-christian religions lost credit every-
where. In Asia Red China and the Soviet Union
emerged. The Moslem world of 500,000,000 people
are searching for unity.
In Europe one must realize that the heart is
Germany and the soul is France. Today Europe's
heart is divided by Yalta, and the soul refused
to be an American satellite. One of the most in-
teresting book about the real trend in Europe is
described in a book "An Empire of 400,000,000
people" by Jean Thiriart (52, avenue Louise
Bruxelles 3, Belgium). All sign indicate that the
old nations of Europe in the West as well in the
East are able to co-operate more and more. Those
who consider Eastern European countries as
protective belt are losing their power. As the
trend continues Eastern and Western European
countries will be united but free from all influence
of the Soviet Union and the U.S.
There is an interesting diplomatic work by
Prof. Edmund Malnasi, President of the Hun-
garian Union in Vienna, Austria, under the title
"after disengagement - Peace in Europe after
disengagement from Russia and U.S.A." (20 pp.
copyright 1963), generally known as Malnasi-
Plan.
Prof. Malnasi gives a plan for a Federation of
Eastern European countries, which he calls:
Danube Union. This plan is based on past and
present economic-political realities and can be
regarded as the modernized form of a plan which
was propagated by the Grand Orient Lodge of
Free Masons between 1935-1939.
Prof. Malnasi was born in Transylvania and
is the author of 47 economic-political scientific
works. His works are well-known throughout the
Moslem world and Asia. As socialist all his life
he was a prisoner of ten years of the Rakosi-Gero
Moscow-puppet Stalinist criminal regime in Hun-
gary.
Hungary is the most natural cultural and com-
mercial bridge between East and West. Not only
geographically but through the fact that Hun-
garians are neither Slavic nor Germanic people
but belong to the Great Turanian Family of peo-
ples whose ancestors were the Sumerians. Tura-
nian peoples live on the Euro-Asian continent.
There is no need to start bridge-building be-
tween the Turanian peoples, since it has been
Page 7
existing for ages but it had been partly neglected
by the Turanian peoples themselves, and partly
obscured by others.
A good example for this existing bridge is the
following cooperation. The Pak-Friends of Hun-
gary in Rawalpindi, West Pakistan under the
leadership of Capt. H. A. Ayaz Khan is the same
organization as the World Hungarian Union, in
Vienna Austria, under the leadership of Prof.
Edmund Malnasi. Dr. Malnasi in the West has
the most up-to-date file about economic-political
factors of Hungary. He promotes true Christian
principles. Dr. Ayaz Khan is also the President
of the Tiszta Magyar Corporation in Rawalpindi,
and is in close cooperation with the Pee-Jee
Brothers Trading Corporation in Sialkot, West
Pakistan. He promotes the true principles of
Islam. The Kadar-regime is fully aware of Turan-
ism and with the aid of their real friends in
Pakistan, the Hungarian state export corpora-
tions are able to sell quality product Made in
Hungary not only in Pakistan but throughout
the Moslem world.
The Rawalpindi group cooperates directly, the
Vienna group, indirectly with the Kadar-regime.
All participating parties make their fair share
of profit.
"Alkoto Magyar" closely cooperates with the
Rawalpindi AND the Vienna groups. Without
any direct cooperation with the Kadar-regime it
is established to participate in creating condi-
tions favorable for investment-triangle trade be-
tween East and West but especially between the
U.S. and Hungary based not on peaceful but on
competitive co-existence.
Politics is the concentrated form of economics.
Wladyslaw Gomulka correctly stated (Przemo-
wienia 1959, Warsaw, 1960 p. 562) : "The coun-
try which does not develop new methods of pro-
duction . . . both in industry and agriculture, has
only one prospect - the prospect of backward-
ness, poverty and weakness. And the lesson of
history is clear: the backward and the weak are
always beaten. The backward and the poor are
the rubbish of history". This is an excellent state-
ment for reality, and against all illusions and
delusions of the concept of equality.
Eastern European countries must develop their
countries by all means through all countries but
there is absolutely no need that the Soviet Union
plays the leading role. The U.S. is in a much bet-
ter situation to develop the industry and agricul-
ture of Eastern European countries than the
Soviet Union. The U.S. has more know-how, more
material and its imperialists are not so reckless
as the imperialists of the Soviet Union. Remem-
ber 1956 and 1968! The Soviet Union has no
moral right to preach about Marxism-Leninism
anymore. They have thrown those teaching over-
board and replaced it with their naked and brutal
imperialism.
While American imperialists are trying harder
and harder to come to an agreement with the
Soviet imperialists, there are realistic Amer-
icans who know if goods do not cross the fron-
tiers guns will. As the saying goes, an ounce of
prevention is more worth than a pound of cure.
East-West trade is the best prevention of a mili-
tary war between the East and West. The East-
West detente is a negative concept. Nobody ever
created anything in this world with a negative
attitude. East-West trade is the positive and
creating approach to settle international prob-
lems. East-West trade is the vehicle of creative
forces.
On page 11 of the September 1967 issue of
"Alkoto Magyar", there is the resolution of the
American Bankers Association for Foreign Trade.
That resolution is the finest blueprint for East-
West trade void of all hypocrisy and in accordance
with the Natural Lazv. One must realize, that
bankers are no promoters of charitable institu-
tions. Banks, even if one calls it a national asso-
ciation are established to lend money to those
who are the best prospect to make profit for
themselves and also for the bankers. The best
prospects to make profit are those who realistic-
ally are able to seize up and satisfy the need of
the people. The large U.S. manufacturing cor-
porations are the best proofs for this statements.
Those corporations are not built on any abstract
ideology but on the support of their satisfied
customers first of all, and then of the satisfied
stockholders and employees. Any type of pro-
paganda can try to twist these facts, only to
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
 Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4
Page 8 ALKOTo MAGYAR
s
September, 1968
find out in the long run, the promoters of that and national hatred amongst Eastern Europeans relocation of the world's resources away from
propaganda have fooled only themselves. which artificially was created by Western Euro- massive military budgets and concentrate more
The association of Eastern European countries pean colonial powers. Fortunately, throughout of human developments.
with U.S. manufacturing corporations through Eastern Europe the role of the churches is on September, 1968.
investment and triangle trade can be the first the decline.
practical step toward the Federation of Eastern The Yugoslav pattern -for investment and tri
Evropean Countries, since such association will angle trade, where the foreign corporation can
create cooperation between Eastern European not own more than 49~/-, already has proven as
countries based on mutual interest. Such mutual workable.
interest will eclipse the centuries old religious East-West trade ultimately will permit the
P.S. This Open Letter and a copy of the Mal-
nasi-Plan were sent to the Economic and Social
Council of the United Nations as certified mail
No. 088437.
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS
A Basic Right: The Right To Criticize Governments
The Charter of the United Nations was agreed
at the San Francisco Conference on June 26,
1945. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
was adopted by the General Assembly in Paris
on December 10, 1948 by a vote of 48 to 0. The
Charter of the UN starts as: We the peoples of
the United Nations determined . . . to reaffirm
faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity
and the worth of human person .. .
According to the interpretation of the Charter,
in any country, a person who suffers a legal
wrong and can get no redress from the courts,
is a victim of the tyranny of the government.
It is understood practically the UN can not be
expected to render justice to all those persons
who suffered injustice from the tyranny of gov-
ernments. It is also reasonable to expect that
the UN consider such injustices where a great
number of people e.g. an entire nation is in-
volved.
Does that mean, however, that an individual
case should be disregarded? It can't be, since the
great masses of peoples consist of individuals.
An individual case just because it is an indi-
vidual case can affect the masses of the peoples.
In an individual case a government expects the
least resistance, opposition and retaliation, and
for these reasons, its tyranny becomes the most
brutal. Precisely an individual case of legal in-
justice is the most suitable to demonstrate to
which extent a government tramples on funda-
mental human rights and discard human dignity.
Indeed an individual case can expose the bar-
barous despotism of a government. And the only
way to bring a despotic government under con-
trol is to expose its hypocrisy and brutality be-
fore the great masses of peoples. Then and only
then, they will realize the worth of the human
person !
Criminal libel case No. 3495/1961 of Manhat-
tan is an excellent case to prove the tyranny of
the U.S. government. On November 1, 1961 I
Reflections -
If I were a Republican
Or called a Democrat
I shall confess I could not tell
Which party was a bat.
"Republican" and "Democrat"
Ere long will not be heard;
It's "liberal" or "conservative"
Each one a dirty word.
The pressure groups now rule
the land,
And politicians scare;
They'll give and give and
give again
Until the cupboard's bare.
And then will come the
man and horse
His countrymen to save,
And all too late the fools will find
Each has become a slave.
For history repeats itself;
Pied Pipers peep and peep.
And many of our brain-washed men
Will follow them like sheep.
With compliments to
ROY S. CHRISTIE
3 East Crescent Ave.
Mahwah, N. J. 07430
was publicly indicted for criminal libel by the
grand jury of Manhattan. After that, for the
net four years not I, the accused, but the de
facto accusers did not dare to come to the court
- a jury trial -. The prosecution postponed the
case thirty-seven (37) times until the case could
not come to trial anymore, because of legal-tech-
nical matters. Through these 37 postponements
the U. S. government did b r u t a I 1~ violate
the U.S. Constitution (Bill of Rights, Phar.VI.),
the fundamental principles of the Charter of the
United Nations, and The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (Articles 5,6,7,8,9,10 and 11).
Pe se from the point of legality and morality, it
makes no difference that the government of a
member-nation of the UN violated the principles
of the Charter involving one individual or the
masses. The question is to which extent it com-
mitted that violation, and whether the UN tole-
rates such violation? Since,, if the Charter can
be violated without impunity by its members,
the Charter becomes worthless, hence the UN
defeats its own purpose!
In criminal case No. 3495/1961 the U.S. gov-
ernment violated all internationally accepted legal
and moral standards and displayed its moral
weakness. Pages. 19-20 of the September 1967
issue of "Alkoto Magyar" and my letter to the
District Attorney of Manhattan of September 10,
1968 give sufficient expalanation of the case. More
details can be read from various letters to various
addresses all of them dated as July 3, 1968, ex-
cept marked otherwise. The first number i
parentheses indicates the number of pages,
second number is that of the certified mail.
are the following:
U.S. State Department (4-088417
tagon (2-088418) ; Federal Bureau
tion (2-088419) ; Central Intelligence Agency
(20088420) ; Life magazine (5-330056) ; NY
Daily News (2-088416) ; NY Times (1-088415) ;
NY Independent (2-088421) ; The White House
(2-088422) ; Four U.S. Senators (5-088426-27-
28-088436) ; Three U.S. Representatives (3-
088423-24-25) ; District Attorney of Manhattan
(2-088429; Answer of the District Attorney of
Manhattan of July 18, 1968 (1) ; my reply to the
District Attorney of Manhattan of Septemb
1968 (3-088435) ; The Vatican, registere
(3) ; and courtrecord of criminal lib
3495/1967 (3) ; altogether 60, pad
My circular letter of 8-page ted as July 1,
1967 under the title: The wast of American tax-
payers' money by the C.I.A." gives further in-
formation through interlocking connections about
case No. 3495/1961. It gives indications how the
U.S. government operates Radio Free Europe
which finances the so-called Hungarian Commit-
tee. In this circular some data is given about the
fascist-Stalinist background of Monsignor Bela
Varga - the president of the Hungarian Com-
mittee - who is protected by the U.S. government
AND the Vatican. The opportunists, pretenders,
dissemblers and criminals of the so-called Hun-
garian Committee greatly influence the American
public and all of them pose as "anti-communist"
claiming to represent the Hungarian people. Ac-
tually they represent only themselves and their
paymasters. The arch-criminal remains Bela
Varga.
It is a fact that Bela Varga as the president of
the so-called Hungarian Committee received huge
amounts of money from American individuals and
corporations for those Hungarians who arrived
in the U.S. under the label of "freedom fighters".
All signs indicate that Bela Varga has stolen
the money and used for himself. He invested it
in legitimate business enterprises but paid no
income and other taxes. I notified I.R.S. and
I.R.S. acknowledges my letter but seemingly
nothing is done against Bela Varga. Either he
is smarter than Al Capone, or I.R.S. just leaves
the present Al Capones undisturbed.
Chapter XV, Article 100 of the Charter of the
United Nations writes: In the performance of
their duties the Secretary-General and the staff
shall not seek or receive instructions from any
government or from any other authority external
of the organization.
The purpose of this letter is to find out whether
there is a possibility to hold an open hearing
within the UN to expose all facts of criminal
libel case No. 3495/1961 including the tyranny
of the U.S. government, which suppressed those
facts. The record of that open hearing should be
available to all those who request it.
The question is now, is the UN able and willing
to bite the hand which feeds it i.e. is the finan-
cial support of the U.S. government to the UN
more important, than upholding the principles
upon which the UN was built? Further does
the UN respect its own rules and regulations?
Legal technical obstacles are subordinated to the
principles and can be changed. If there is a will,
there is a way.
This writing has many purposes and objectives.
One of them is - in moral terms - the indict-
ment against the U.S. government. Morality is
superior to legality, and legality is superior to
brutal force.
There is an American saying: It's better to
light a candle, than curse the darkness. Tyrants
do not understand the meaning of that simple
saying. Therefore, they have to be hauled before
the people, and make them understand!
New York, September, 1968.
Geza Korda
P.S. This Open Letter, the mentioned 60 pages
and circular letter of July 1, 1967 were sent to
the Secretary-General of the UN as certified mail
No. 884471. - (Signed for printing on 9/16/'68)
What Kind Of A "Nut"
He
He
He
He
He
He
He
He
He
Is He?
wants to run his own business.
wants to select his own doctor.
wants to make his own bargains.
wants to buy his own insurance.
wants to select his own reading matter.
wants to provide for his own old age.
wants to make his own contracts.
wants to select his own charities.
wants to educate his own children as he
wishes.
He wants to make his own investments.
He wants to select his own friends.
He wants to provide his own recreation.
He wants to compete freely in the market
place.
He wants to grow by his own efforts.
He wants to profit from his own errors.
He wants to compete with ideas.
He wants to be a man of good will.
What kind of a nut is he? He's an American
who understands and believes in the Declaration
of Independence, that's what kind.
Aren't you glad you are, too? And don't you
wonder why so many of our fellow Americans are
trying so hard to destroy the kind of life that has
made us the aim and the envy of every other peo-
ple on earth?
The question is: What kind of nuts are they?
By Bob Segal, Editor
Brownsville (Texas) Herald
From the Odessa (Texas) American
Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100010037-4