NSC ON KOREA 27 APRIL 1977

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79R00603A002500020017-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
July 13, 2005
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 28, 1977
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79R00603A002500020017-8.pdf72.8 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/07/20 CIA-RDP79R00603AO02500020017-8 TS 770131 C y 2 8 APR 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: D/DCI/NI FROM: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: NSC on Korea 27 April 1977 At the NSC meeting on Korea, General Brown took up the theme which you and I had injected into the PRC meeting on Korea last week --- that of diving the President a good evaluation of the risks and benefits of both pulling out and the possible ameliorative measures in so doing. He clearly indicated was not his opinion tat this had been done. 1. It is my view that we should develop a much more useful paper than the two-page one that I saw shortly before getting into that NSC meeting. It is also my view that we should specifically address our evaluation of the impact on t_hevarious parties concerne; e.g., Japan, China, North and-' ou Korea, of t e various offsetting measures that are pro ose ose measures as I understood t e' were: 7 a. Reaffirming our intent to maintain Naval and Air Force forces i n the Far East. b. Coming up with a phased reduction program rather than 'a sudden withdrawal. c. Public reaffirmation of our commitment to the.defense'of South Korea, indicating that the residual South Korean forces will be the equivalent of what has been there between US and the South Koreans in capability. 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/07/20 : CIA-RDP79R00603AO02500020017-8 Approved For Release 21Q5/ Q~ A R0P;79I 603AO02500020017-8 produce after the PRC meeting. d. Indicating a commitment to refurbish the South Korean military forces. It is necessary to build up their capability to an equivalency of what is there now, this to be done largely by South Korean procure- ment with their own funds from the United States, but perhaps partly with the leaving behind of equipment from the division we withdraw. (The question of Congressional approval for either type of action must be considered.) 2. Working with State, I think we should continue to develop the paper we set out to STANSFIELD TURNER Admiral, U.S. Navy Approved For Release 2005/07/20 : CIA-RDP79R00603AO02500020017-8