EC STAND ON OIL SHARING COULD DISTURB IEP PLANS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78S01932A000100170065-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 20, 2004
Sequence Number: 
65
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 25, 1974
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78S01932A000100170065-9.pdf86.61 KB
Body: 
25X1 c~p~o~i~cvHi~~vM ~i~oas Approv~IT~br~~~~'~fl04/10/08 :CIA-RDP~~S01932 J C. d 1 ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ {.f U .. R.1 CzAi~-E-iSS Stl13JCC'f ? EC STAND ON 02{ SHARING COULD DISTURB IEP PLANS IrlITIAL PRESS .ACCOUNTS OF A C~RJSSEI..S PRESS CONFERE:i~JCE TODAY BY EC ENERGY COMMISSTONE{2 SIi`IONET REPORT THE COMMISSION' S JUDGMEi?JT Ti-{AT , ALTH(?UGH THERE 1JOUL.D BE NOTHING :LLLEGAL ABOUT EIGNT OF THE NINE EC M~:~'1F3ERS JOINING 'i`HE US-BACKED INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY WI'4`HIN ~?{{E OECD a DIL SFIAI~ING--A KEY ELEMENT OF THE PROJECTED ; At:'CIVI'f'Y OF TH4 CONSUMER GROUP--?COUl.D NOT TAKE PLACE AMONG TI-{E '-:g~2(~H'I' II" FRAI~ICE E{ERE LOFT GOUT ~~ THE COMMISSION TS NOT OPPOSED TO THE OIL~~SH?ARING PLAN OF T{-iE PROJ~:C'i'ED AGENCYa BUT FEELS E30tJND BY EC RULES ON FREE MOUEMEN i' OF ..GOODS WIT~i:CN THE COMMUN'1"'I'Y TO POINT OUT THAT THE EC MEMBERS JOINING :A,?:>~~ Approve'~"I~e~IL~d~f~'~2~1`~~4~~ :~"L'~Id'-F~'F~7~~0'193~2A~001001~ 25X1 t~UT~C~~T1G ~~1~5~~~~ 25X1 ScrJ n Approved For Release 2004/10/08: CIA-RDP7$ $IG NAL CENTER VSE ONLY Gbl ACP TOG 7PE MRO DCI TRI ~ a f3. ~ G n ces 1 4 7 10 _~ z s s sl 3 6 D 12 THE CONSUMER GROUP,000LD NOT WITHHOLD OTL FROM FRANCE EVEN IF THE FRENCH D4 NOT PARTICIPATE TN THE OECD AGENCY. THE COMPASSION OPINION TS ALSO INTENDED, HOWEVER, TO BOLSTER TT5 PLEASJ~ FOR AN EC COMMON ENERGY POLICY. A NEW PROPOSAL !;JILL BE MADE QEFORE THE END OF THIS YEAR. TF THE ~COMMUNT~TY WORKED OUT TTS OWN OIL-SHARING PLAN, THIS COULD PRESUMABLY ~?BE FITTED INTO THE INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM WHETHER OR SNOT FRANCE JOINED THE LATTER ~:NDIVTDUALLY? . ]CU~f~~T IS DIFFICULT TO SAY WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF THE COMMTSS:I:ON OPINION aY TF~E EaGHT EC MEMBERS WOULD NECESSARILY FRUSTRATE THE PLANS OF THE CONSUMER AGENCY- EVEN WITHOUT AGREEMENT ON AN EC SHARING ARRANGEP)ENT, TT TS CONCEIVABLE THAT THE~TNTERNATxONAL. ARRANGEMEPJTS MIGHT BE IMPLEMENTED TN SUCH A WAY AS NO'f TO KEEP OTL FROM FRANCE', THE COMMISSION JUDGPIENT P1AY NEVERTHELESS RAISE ENOUGH CONCERNS ~:TQ THREATEN THE TIMETABLE FOR ESTA3LTSNING TFiE OECD AGENCY. E2 :f.MF' DET ? ~i ESPECIAL DISTC~ISUTTON ; OER h IaJ EUR DTV ~ P~JTO 25`X1 25X1 RF. i.f_l.~lNG QFP:C[R ~~]y~~J OV/c~(J] GOORI)~N.'.Tlr+Ci OFFIC LR."i 25X1 CIJ:_:itF lC i.ilC?N NFP~Q ry1~/Fa-~r~~f"t~e~e~~~;~-~Q,4.~~~/~(l~iir~1~4-~R~,~2~~~8~~~F~~~~~4$ 0100170065-9