REACTION IN CONGRESS: U.S. MUST NOT ACT ALONE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060036-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
July 15, 2005
Sequence Number: 
36
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 6, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060036-0.pdf104.73 KB
Body: 
J C-~t i a, CX 0 '1 Approved For Release 2005/07/25 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060036-0 Reaction in Congress: U. S. Must Not Act Alone By E. W. KENWORTHY Special to The New York Times . WASHINGTON, June 5-The dominant Congressional reac- tion today to the outbreak of hostilities between Israel and the Arab states was that the United States Should take no unilateral action. In both the Senate and the House of Representatives, the hope was that somehow the United Nations could get the belligerents to agree to a cease- fire. Failing this, there was hope that the Soviet Union would agree to meet with the United States, Britain and France to work out a big power approach to the crisis. Although two or three House members suggested that the United States should act alone, if necessary, in coming to the aid of Israel, no leader in either body supported such action. The prevailing sentiment was most forcibly expressed by Se _n- or Richard P.-Russell Demo- crat of Georgia, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the subcommit- tee on armed service appropria- tions. Russell Opposes Lone Action Mr. Russell, who has given undeviating support to the war in Vietnam even though he has always questioned the wisdom of the United States involve- ment there, told reporterd that he was "unalterably opposed to any unilateral intervention" in the Middle East. Whatever action the United States takes, he said, should be multilateral. And, he added, "the multilateral action should be multi-multilateral." At 9:30 A.M., after Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Secre- tary of Defense Robert S. Mc- Namara had briefed President Johnson at the White House, they went to Capitol Hill for a meeting with Congressional leaders and the chairman and ranking members of Senate and U.N. or Big-Power Attempt to Attain a Cease-Fire Is Generally Supported House committees most immed- iately affected. They were joined there by Richard Helms, director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Th meeting lasted just over one hour. Those who attended declined comment, beyond saying that the briefing had dealt solely with the military situation and not with policy decisions. They added that the two secretaries and Mr. Helms had, at that mo- ment, no clear idea of whether action had been initiated by Is- raeli or Arab forces nor what the situation was. Just 'Fragmentary Reports' Mike Mansfield, the Senate Democrat is leader, said, "You could have read the same things in the press. All they did was give us what fragmentary re- ports they had." The Administration, Mr. Mansfield told reporters, was taken by surprise. It had an- ticipated, he said, that there was still some room for diplo- matic activity because the Unit- ed States had asked Israel for restraint and "the Soviet Un- ion had supposedly asked Egypt to restrain themselves." There was no suggestion in the meeting with Secretary Rusk and Secretary McNamara, Mr. Mansfield said, that the United States take military ac- tion. "Now that the Flame had been lit," he said, "I would an- ticipate that the Security Coun- cil would, of necessity, be forced to face up to the situation. But what it will do remains to be seen." Asked whether the Adminis- tration was under much pres- sure from the Senate for unilat- eral action, Mr.. Mansfield said: "Both the Administration and the Senate have-to use a mod- ern colloquialism-kept their! cool about this." But he also said that there, might have been more pressure, to help Israel if it had not been for "the situation in Vietnam." There were differences of opinion over whether United States involvement in Vietnam, was directly related to Presi- dent Gamal Abdel Nasser's de cision to request the removal, of United Nations forces from' Egyptian soil and his subse- quent announcement of a' blockade of the Gulf of Aquaba.', There were also differences of opinion about how much en- couragement President Nasser had received from the So- viet Union to take his actions. Mr. Mansfield thought that "this had happened apart from the situation in Vietnam S' Sen- ator Russell expressed doubt that President Nasser meant to go as far as he had, and thought', he probably would not have done so if Secretary General Thant: of the United Nations had not yielded precipitately to his re- quest for the withdrawal of United Nations forces. In fact, Mr. Russell said, "what U Thant needed was a few good Southerners to fili- buster the situation." Senator J. W. Fulbri rht De ocrat of Arkansas, said that the Middle Eastern crisis was "an outgrowth of our involvement in Vietnam." Last week he had i expressed the hope that the So- viet Union would agree to use its influence with President Nas ser to ease the crisis in returnfor American agreement to de- escalate the war in Vietnam. ~ Today, Mr. Fulbright saidi that the Russians had "appar-1 ently missed a great opportun-1 ity to gain tremendous prestige" by acting as peacemakers. Regardless of these differ ences of view on the relation-' ship of the Vietnam 'War and the Middle Eastern crisis, it was apparent that the heavy in- volvement in Vietnam was, largely responsible for the sen- timent against any further uni lateral intervention. Approved For Release 2005/07/25 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060036-0