TRENDS IN FOREIGN POLICY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82R00025R000400190006-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 11, 2005
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82R00025R000400190006-6.pdf167.1 KB
Body: 
Approved For Releas ' /k4 : CIA-RDP8R00025R000400190006-6 Tread* in Foreign Policy 1, .Although we believe foreign policy was not a principal cause of Khrushchev's downfall, the end of his highly personal rule does ant implications for the conduct of future Soviet foreign relations . A. A. collective leadership tench to be more conservative and lose venturesome, though this does not mean inactivity or an inability to make decisions. 1. During the coming months, and perhaps for a few years, internal Soviet polities are likely to influence foreign policy more than during T.hrushcheev's last years. nt collective leadership appears o have no clearly dominant figure. 3. This process of group rule probably ces the chances of aggressive Soviet action, but sets a limit on movement in the opposite direction - - movement toward concessions and agreements on major East- JTest issues. B. Thus, the short-term outlook is for a continuation of the main lines of Soviet foreign policy since the Cuban missile crisis. Approved For Release 2 Approved-For Release Q34: CIA-RDP82RUp025R000400190006-6 C. Soviet economic problems will also put some check an an aggressive foreign policy, particularly in Europe. D. The on-going confict with Communist China will continue to have contradictory consequences for Soviet policy. 1. On the one hand, it is clear that the Soviet$ are not going to compete with the Chinese by adopting their extreme revolutionary militancy. 2. On the other hand, Chinese activity in Africa and Asia calls forth competitive Soviet efforts which clash with U. S. interests. Soviets will stretch the concept of coexistence so as to permit them to pursue vehement anti-Western policies in the underdeveloped areas without paying a price in their direct relations with the West. E. The competition with the Chinese continues to influence the Soviet public posture on Cuha and "revolutionary movements" in Latin America. 1. Although the new Soviet leaders have r'ned zhrushchev's pledge to support Castro, ApprSle8 ir1 14AO2tb5 311 tOt14DP8 F 0(#281 0190006-6 Cuban-U. S. relations. Approvved For ReleS M C 3/24: CIA-RDP42R00025R000400190006-6 3 the c idtac t * om law This pro rd bringlug- on a 4 a Wwc. Approved For Release 20.01 CIA-RDP82R00025R000400190006-6 Approved For Releas3f24 : CIA-RDP842R00025R000400190006-6 The Chinese challenge is likely to spur the Soviets to make more strenuous efforts to exploit anti-U. S. movements and political developments in Latin America. 1. USSR apparently has endorsed decisions by a recent conference of Latin American Communists in Havana calling for more organized and coordinated propaganda and tactics. 2. Main objective is to break Cuba's isolation within the Western Hemisphere and to combat continuing Ti. . S., pressures against the Castro regir e. 3. The Communists promised pore active support for the Venezuelan revolutionary movement. 4. They also singled out "freedom fighters" in Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Paraguay and Haiti as deserving Communist support. However, this prospect of stronger Soviet verbal support for anti-U. S. movements in Latin America probably does not foreshadow important new Soviet political and economic commitments or acceptance of new risks of a clash with U. S. power. 44Approved For Release 2005&/,p : CIA-RDP82R00025R000400190006-6