SMITH HAS NEW NEWS, ALL BAD , FOR RAYBURN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
29
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 24, 2005
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 18, 1961
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4.pdf3.88 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 ' ?ASU'GI ON r, I8,I96 9 engirieered,F This time it was a pair of Ito keep watch on the Cenraa 411 Bad, for Rayburn Chairman Howard W. Smith, dead set against the TV pro whose Rules Committee was posal and is reported not to enlarged because of liberal keen for the fuel policy mean complaints that it moved too' ure. Yesterday, Smith ferrete( slowly, continued his new out of the files dust-laden pro burst of activity yesterday and posals to halt spending with came up with more had news out specific congressional ar for Speaker Sam Rayburn. propriations and to set- up Joint House-Senate committee r~tt as New News, Government spending and to! He set them also for hear let Congress ride herd on the ing next week, despite the Central Intelligence Agency. fact that Rayburn is known tc oppose h(M Pf 9? -~ _...._x The Virginian already ha , discovered, and ordered fo hearings next week, long" pending resolutions to ope the House and its comanittee to radio and television broad- casts and to order a congres- sional study of a national pol- icy on fuels. Rayburn, who Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 D90 Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - DAILY DIGEST i `' )ruary 23 Committee Investigations: By voice votes the House adopted H. Res. 92, 55, 98, and 141, which authorized studies and investigations by the- following standing committees of the House, respectively: Interior and Insular Affairs, Science and Astronautics, Merchant Marine and Fisheries, and Education and Labor. Pages 2420-2421 Meteorology: The House complied with request of the Senate for the return of S. 681, authorizing the Secretary of Commerce to enter into contracts for the conduct of research in the field of meteorology. Page 2424 Calendar Wednesday: Pursuant to a unanimous-con- sent request the House agreed to dispense with Calendar Wednesday business of March I. Pages 2424-2425 Legislative Program: The legislative program for the week of February 27-March 4 was announced by the majority leader. Pages 2424-2425 Program for Monday: Adjourned at 3:53 P?m. until Monday, February 27, at 12 o'clock noon, when the House will act on 16 resolutions providing funds for the expenses of committee studies and investigations which have been authorized by the House. Committee Meetings FEED GRAIN Committee on Agriculture: Subcommittee on Livestock and Feed Grains met in executive session on H.R. 4510, to provide a special program for feed grains for 1961. No announcement was made and the subcommittee will continue on this subject Friday, February 24. MILITARY POSTURE Committee on Armed Services: Heard a briefing by Robert S. McNamara, Secretary of Defense, and Gen. L. L. Lemnitzer, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, in an executive meeting on military posture. The committee will continue in executive session on Friday, February 24, on this subject. ORGANIZATION Committee on Banking and Currency: Held an execu- tive organizational meeting. The subcommittees were appointed. MINIMUM WAGE Committee on Education and Labor: Special Sub on1- mittee on Labor began executive consideration of H.R. 3935, to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 in regard to increasing the Federal minimum wage to $1.25 an hour. No final action was taken on the bill. The committee will continue on this subject Friday, February 24. COMMITTEE EXPENSES Committee on House Administration: 0rdered favor- ably reported to the House the follow'n resolutions providing funds for expenses of r he f= )lowing com- mittees: H. Res. 94, Agriculture, $50,000; H. Res. 79, Armed Services, $150,000; H. Res. 144, Banking and Currency, $ s._c;,ooo; H. Res. 149, Education and Labor, $63 .;c,oo; H. Res. 61, Foreign Affairs, $150,000; H. Res. 70, Government Operations, $(4",000; H. Res. 158, House Administration, $2 %,E goo; H. Res. 128, Interior and Insular Affai ;, $6o,ooo; H. Res. 165, Interstate and Forei.-r Commerce, $435,000; H. Res. 68, Judiciary, $200,000; H. Res. 99, Merchant Marine and Fisl n:aged in all fields of intelligence. Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 Approved For Release S 5 P7 4R000600070001-4 8712 CONGRI, June 1 Mr. BROWN. We understand that they do not investigate muggings in Washington, but the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. BROWN] is aware of the fact that they do engage in certain intelli- gence activities, one way or another. I may add for the gentleman's benefit that if his committee has not studied the problem perhaps our subcommittee will. Mr. BOW. When any Foreign Service officer makes a report to the Secretary of State he is indulging in intelligence work. He reports as to the conditions in the country. But as far as other types of intelligence such as we have heard about recently are concerned, they are not a part of the functions of the State Department. Mr. BROWN. Let me ask the gentle- man this direct question, if I may: Has the gentleman's committee found any indication that any'so-called intelligence agent or any person engaged in intelli- gence activities, that is, in the State De- partment, has taken any action or had taken any action in connection with the situation in Cuba? Mr. BOW. None that I know of. Mr. BROWN. Prior to this time? Mr. BOW. Not that I recall. I should like to point out before clos- ing, and I am about to close, one other area that has disturbed me somewhat and that is the contributions being made by agencies of the United Nations to some of the, countries of the world through some of the organizations. Per- haps we can. go into all of these later on more in detail. I am using figures now from memory and not with the facts be- fore me, but I am pretty close to them, :I am quite shire. There are; as you know, certain agen- cies of the United Nations where we make very substantial contributions to these agenciesand have no control over the manner in which the money is being used. This : is a matter I think the proper committees of the House should go into, and our committee :perhaps at some time will go into it. I have in mind the Pan American Heath Organ- ization. We know that the United States is now contributing about 66 percent of the funds for Pan American Health. We also know that since the advent of Castro in Cuba, and particularly within the last year, they have about tripled the amount of funds going into Commu- nist Cuba. Here we have the strange situation of 66 percent of these funds being contributed by the United States to the United Nations in connection with the Pan American Organization, and then they use these funds to further the efforts of Mr. Castro in Cuba. This is a story that I think will unfcld later on and be of great interest to the members of the committee. You also have the so-called Hoffman project. The funds there are being di- verted for the use of Communist coun- tries. We are therefore making con- tributions to Communist pro;iects. Mr. GROSS. Mr. Chairman, will the gentleman yield? Mr. BOW. I yield to the gentleman from Iowa. Mr. GROSS. Not only that, but ap- parently we have no control over the assessments: placed on the taxpayers of this country by the United Nations. I questions of policy, but questions of ad- might also point out the uncollected m:inistrat;ion as well. Policy is not self- assessments of practically all these or- executing; it requires administrators ganizations. Your hearings show that , and techniques of administration capa- there is owing to the United Nations by the member nations almost $10 million, $9,500,000. In connection with the United Nations Emergency Force the unpaid assessments total $22,714,000, UNESCO, $2,208,000, and so on down the line. I do not think there Is a single organization connected with that Tower of Babel in New York that does not owe a substantial amount of money in un- paid assessments. But the taxpayers of this country pay promptly and right through the nose. Mr. BOW. There are a large number of delinquencies in the United Nations. It should be insisted that they be col- lected, because these amounts are being paid by the taxpayers of the United States and they are being diverted in many instances to the Communist Party. This should be checked on care- fully. When we say, "Why should we continue to contribute?" we are told we might be thrown out of these organiza- tions. It might be good to do that in some of these organizations. It might be just as well to withdraw from some of them. Mr. GROSS. Mr. Chairman, will the gentleman yield? Mr. BOW. I yield. Mr. GROSS. One Government offi- cial, and I cannot recall his name, who came before your committee, said it is the natural thing for the United States to put up the bulk of the money for these organizations--the natural thing for us to do. Mr. BOW. Well, we have been doing it and it is about time we stopped it or we are going to go broke, if we do not stop. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Bowl has consumed 34 minutes. (Mr. MARSHALL (at the request of Mr. ROONEY) was granted permission to extend his remarks at this point.) Mr. MARSHALL. Mr. Chairman, my work on the subcommittee on State, Justice, and Judiciary appropriations has been a satisfying experience. It is not it new experience since it was my privilege to serve on this important sub- committee in the 82d Congress during the troubled days of the Korean conflict. President Kennedy has called this "an hour of national peril and national op- portunity." He has also described for us his personal reactions upon assuming the Presidency: No man entering upon this office, regard- less of his party, regardless of his previous service in Washington, could fail to bestag- gered upon learning-the harsh enormity of the trials through which we must pass in the next 4 years-each day we draw nearer the hour of maximum danger. Responsibility for our posture in the face of this threat falls upon all of us. As elected Members of the Congress, this responsibility falls upon us in a special measure. POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION The very urgency that the President has continued to express concerning the role of our Government Involves not only In his first appearance before our sub- committee, Secretary of State Dean Rusk spoke this truth with admirable clarity : Administration must know what ends it is expected to serve; public administration, especially, must concern Itself with effec- tiveness and efficiency, for it uses public funds and must do so in the spirit of a trust. Policy, on the other hand, cannot be suc- cessful unless the tools of policy are well designed and capable of carrying it out. Administration is the handmaiden of pol- icy; it is not its own justification; it serves to accomplish the great national purpose we have in view. This requires that the structure and procedures of the Department of State be attuned to the central tasks of our Nation in the foreign policy field. It also means that deficiencies, waste, or fail- ures ought not to be accepted. In critical times such as these, we cannot afford the little mistakes which impede our effort; indeed, the impact of what some might call little things can be decisive as to our sue- cess in getting on with our great national policies. Anyone who has worked with appro- priations for various agencies of govern- ment has encountered policymakers who regard administration as beneath their dignity and outside their ken. They are impatient with questions of detail and prefer to deal in the generalities of high strategy. It is refreshing, therefore, to have the Secretary of State admit to a working interest in the operations of his Department. His candor and frankness have helped to make our work less ardu- ous and more meaningful. TRIBUTE TO CHAIRMAN By the same token, no man is more respected for his candor and frankness than our chairman, JOHN RooNEY. His careful and searching examination of every witness and every program is an indication both of his personal knowl- edge of all phases of each agency's work and his personal interest in their suc- cess. His discontent with evasion and his profound respect for ability help to make our hearings informative and useful. He is successful in eliciting the facts upon which we can make reasonable judg- ments in terms of both policy and ad- ministration. I know of no higher tribute to a hard-working chairman. The courtesy shown me by the other members of the subcommittee and by our able and, experienced clerk, Jay B. Howe, has made my return enjoyable and rewarding. rACE HARD CHOICES To realize the importance of the bill before us, we need only look to the world around us. The implementation and administration of our relations with the other nations of the world are an awe- some task in these critical times. In every crisis, men have thought their own time to be a turning point in his- tory. They have been. justified, just as we are justified, in recognizing contem- porary events as signposts to the future marking alternate roads. We are con- stantly faced with hard choices and the discouragement and frustration which must follow even temporary failures. Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE who are about to lfrse their jobs. They are about to be thrown on the unemploy- ment rolls. There will be great loss to businessmen and merchants in the area, to landlords, and td banks that are wait- ing for payments o be made on mort- gaged homes. It w it cause undue hard- ship in an area tl- at has already been suffering from the: impact of adjoining depressed areas. it is unbelievable to me, Mr. Speaker, that the Secretary of Commerce cannot; recognize the facts and approve this ships can be buil 3,000 persons who such shipbuilding. (Mr. O'NEILL permission to revi remarks.) The SPEAKER the previous order tleman from Mass is recognized for and include extra [Mr. CONTE'S here in the United tect the jobs of the was given extend his f the House the gen- husetts [Mr. CONTE] minutes. emarks will appear GOVERNME T SPENDING The SPVAKER )ro tempore. Under the previous ord ? of the House the gentleman from I wa is recognized for (Mr. GROSS as 'd and was given per- mission to revise a d extend his remarks and include extra eous matter.) Mr. GROSS. 1 r. Speaker, ever-in- creasing Governor nt spending is not a budget problem a bank-statement type of problem a one. It is a consti- Every addition t the spending power of the executive b anch alters the Con- stitution because affects the separa- tion of powers w ich the Constitution set up among the hree branches, and it alters the checks arid balances by which each branch was k pt in place. Big spending in stably swells the ex- ecutive power wh a it diminishes the legislative and judicial branches.. In- evitably the gxeccl ve wields such power over Congress and he courts, as to make restraints from th other branches vir- The executive with large spending powers is cumul ively assuming the legislative function because under con- gressionally delega ed power and in too many instances lid has been given the right to decide pot y issues and the size and shape of the executive agencies. With the growth of delegated power to the executive the courts become the mouthpiece of the xecutive because dis- senting judges are no longer appointed. Judges who will c ange judicial prece- dents most radicE lly are favored over those who hold to the historic interpre- tation of the Const tution. Historically the great threat to free- dom has been the i se of armed forces by those who aspire t dictatorship. In the industrial-money economy the same end can be achieved b those who assemble vast pools of spe ding money to buy obedient "armies" I who carry out their' directives in politics, business, and the press. Hitler demoostr*ted, 1932-36, that the unlimited spending power is as useful in establishing dictatorship today as, armed uprising was in earlier times. . The spenders would like to build up the myth that opponents of spending are pennypinchers, who care nothing! for people, and never see any Issue in larger terms than balance sheets. We take our stand on the ground that the executive power must be, limited. When vise add vast spending powers to its administrative and police powers, it becomes unlimited govern- ment, going down the steep slope to ! tyranny and dictatorship, however cleverly veiled. We take the position taken by the American colonists that we want no unlimited Executive power in this coun- try, whether it isithe Royal Governors and the Redcoat armies of George III, or the welfare Stste with its spending bureaucracy of the New Deal, Fair Deal, and New Frontier.' We say that the;Republican Party has missed a great historic opportunity. It has been satisfied tonly to cut Executive spending a little here and a little there. The Republican t Party has signally failed to point o*t that excessive Ex- ecutive spending s usurpation, and an erosion of the Cohstitution as effective as an attack upon it. When-will the Republican Party wake p ;Member marks and incledc ex ,r ineous matter.) Mr. DADDARTO. "'Ii Speaker, it is my purpose to uee thi t-me to initiate a discussion on what I bolieve to be one of the most vital is o s of American government todh y: th role and organi- zation of intelligeneg. The collection and I=eocessing of infor- mation by all a genci of the Govern- ment is a continuing 1 ?ocess. It is vital to the success of any government that all sources be exploited o the maximum degree, and that sued information be weighed and processe- with calm judg- ment so that the fact s nd estimates on which decisions nay t aken-decisions that affect the survi . a of us all-will be as complete and r -.wnd as man can assure. It has been almost ;'ears since Pearl Harbor-but that die ser showed how scattered our intellige 1co activities were. Congress insisted, of-='i the war, on a more unified approac=i. The success of the Office of Strateg- Services, during World War IT, prove he necessity for an instrument of spe-i*d capabilities to assist in this effort. -s time has passed and the need for a si perior intelligence capacity has grown, =.s'rries have been aroused over just ho. efficient our in- telligence communit may be, and whether we do, inde_c. have the best coordination of such r =.-tivities that could exist. It is apparent that Congress needs to exercise and most ex }rise more super- vision and surv?-Illan ,e over this effort. We see and heap' cha: ,--s in the existing establishment, some excuses for past mistakes, promise of b,tter things, .but we do not have - uffici r it; information on which to base our owl- jidgment of these `hatters, so long; as r committee exists to-oversee the entire intelligence com- munity. Many Members (Congress have spoken frankly to ma )f their concern about this arm of ~ecutive govern- ment. They recogn_ e. as many have said, that inte'ilgen is the foremost line, the outpost line of our defense. It is needed, and must b organized, to pro- vide guidance to the ralicy, to the eco- nomic defense, is we'" as to the military defense of the United `rates. It has been said .;i it it is common knowledge the Cc's ral Intelligence Agency will soon los its present Direc- tor, who has intentic = of retiring soon. Another will be cho::c;r to succeed him. The present Director s enjoyed the full support of the Cong e :s. What guide- lines are being folio- -se i-and should be followed-in the sear=rh for a successor? This question, too, is matter of concern to the Congres,,. Congress, therefore, should consider seriously the e,tabhi''unent of a watch- dog committee on tie intelligence com- munity. In a time c 'particular tension, all Members have a right to be assured that every step is be.os taken to secure the information nec-wsary in connection with their ultimate ,* ponsibility under the Constitution ir -.natters affecting war. The Members -i we a right to be aware of matters pt t lining to the na- tional interest irisin 'rom covert intel- ligence operations. [1 ey have a respon- sibility and a right ;? exercise close su- up and take up ts task to cut down every spending avenue through which the spenders have'iworked systematically to erode the Constitution piece by piece without a sound? True Republicais in cooperation with constitutional Dertiocrats have only one task-to make war on the destruction of our Constitution at every point where the new absolutis*n is at work. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the previous orders of the House the gen- tleman from Oklahoma [Mr. EDMOND- SON] is recognized for 15 minutes. remarks and matter. pear hereafter in The SPEAKER the previous ord gentleman from n is recognized for (Mr. RANDALI permission to rev marks and inclue [Mr. RANDALI hereafter in the pro tempore. Under r of the House the issouri [Mr. RANDALL] 5 minutes. asked and was given se and extend his re- extraneous matter.) 'S remarks will appear Appendix.] CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the previous order of the House the gen- tleman from Connecticut [Mr. DADA- RIO] is recognized for 1 hour. (Mr. DADDARIO asked and was given permission to revise and extend his re- Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 1961 N. Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE Wr. CRAMER asked and was given perftission to'extend his remarks at this point'in the RECORD, and to include ex- traneos matter.) [Mr. CRAMER'S remarks will appear hereafter'~in the Appendix.] -tMr. HOFFMAN of Michigan ad- dressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in the Appendix.] THE NEED: FOR ORE CARRIERS The SPEAKER pro tempord.- Under previous ordet of the House, the gentle- man from Massachusetts [Mr. O'NErLL] is recognized for 10 minutes. (Mr. O'NEILL asked`and was given permission to revise and extend his re- marks.) Mr. O'NEILL. Mr. Speaker, I read in the Washington Post of Mohday, Sep- tember 25, in Drew Pearson'S3 column; how he gave; praise to Represltative CARL VINSON and also to Congressman HESERT of Louisiana because of the great interest that that committee has shiwn in the program of the U.S. Government concerning property of defense contrac- +,,.,.,, +h,,+ +1,n TT-,+.A G++.,+ae 1,,,;1+ ,,,. ,,_ stalled on their property. I certainly hope Mr. VINSON and Mr. HEBERT look into this matter thoroughly. I certainly hope that the: U.S. Government gets its full return; none of us have #.ny great sympathy for the big defense contrac- tors of the Nation who have done excep- tionally well. Mr. Speaker, also in the article he mentions that Bethlehem Steel Co. is trying to get a $15 million Government subsidy for two ore carriers, but they were stopped by the alert Secretary of Commerce Luther Hodges. Some 4 or 5 months ago, the Speaker pro tempore, Mr. MCCORMACK, Congressman JAMES BURKE who represents the Quincy area of Massachusetts where the huge Bethle- hem Shipbuilding concern is located and myself-and Ihave the Bethlehem Ship- building Repair Division in my East Bos- ton District--went over to see Mr. Hodges with regard to getting it subsidy for ore carriers for the Bethlehem Ship- yard. We are interested in the welfare of 5,000 men that are going to be laid off within a month in the Bethlehem Ship-' yard in Quincy. We are interested in the welfare and the economy of the area of our locale. We are interested in the de- fense of the Nation. We are interested in the problem of the ships. W6 have a great port up in our area..We have great shipyards up there. k quarter of the economy of the south shore area de- pends on the' shipyards/ and depends on the great Boston Harbor. There has not been an ore car:-ier built in the United States since 1946. At that time Bethlehem Steil built two ore car- riers. The constrfction of these two ships would miearl employment of 3,000 men, who are. due to be laid off in a short time fora period of a year and a half to 2 years. We were.-asking for $14 million as a subsidy. ,'$etlilehem Steel intends to build twri ore carriers. If we do not get this subsidy, what is the Bethlehem Ship Co. going to do? It is going to go to Approved Holland, where it can build those two ships at the price it would normally 'spend without the subsidy. It is interesting to note that there are at the present time only four American- flag ore carriers in existence, the ones built by Bethlehem under a construction subsidy in 1946, and these are now obso- lete. There are 146 ore carriers built abroad since 1946. On August 17, Mr. BURKE, and Mr. MCCORMACK and I wrote a joint letter to Secretary Hodges asking him under the act of 1946 if he would again con- sider and give to the Bethlehem Ship- yard in Quincy, Mass., a subsidy. This is the telegram we received on September 11,1961: I have held up - replying to your letter of August 17 on the subject of Bethlehem Steel Corp.'s application for construction differ- ential subsidy or, the building of two ore carriers pending a thorough review of the entire matter. I have now reached the con- elusion that it would not be feasible to ap- prove Bethlehem Steel's application as a matter of policy until: (1) the Secretary of Defense determines that the construction of the two ore carriers proposed takes priority over the construction of liner-type vessels in our regular ship replacement program., your telegram stating that "the Secre- tary of Defense determines that the construction of the two ore carriers pro- posed takes priority over tile. construc- tion of liner-type vessels in: our regular ship replacement program," let me say that the,, only four American.-flag ore carriers in .existence today are the ones built by Bethlehem under a construction subsidy in 1946 and these are now ob- solete. It is their present intention to replace these wit]} two 51,000-ton Ameri- can-flag ore carriers. For your informa- tion there have been 146 ore carriers built abroad since 1946. None have been built in the. United States with the ex- ception of the four mentioned. I have been infoYmed by good sources from the Navy Department that even though they could be converted into twb,t:ransports they would be of utmost importance for the purposes for which they---,are de- signed----to carry ore. Second, he says in the telegram: The chairmen of the House and Sevate Appropriations- Committees advise this be- partment that funds allocated for the coin- struction of liner-type vessels may be di- verted to the construction of the ore carriers under consideration. Well. Mr. Secretary Hodges, with ref- erence to that part of the telegram, there are funds in existence from the low bids received in connection with the ship re- placement program of the last year. It is my understanding there was $18 mil- lion available. Therefore, it is not nec- essary and it has never been necessary to obtain permission from the chairmen of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. This has always been done at the dis- cretion of the Maritime Administrator in the past. A simple notification to the chairman has always made it accept- able. I understand Secretary Hodges, from my conversation with him in the presence of Speaker pro tempore Mc- CORMACK and Mr. BURKE, said. he was opposed to subsidies. It is all right to 20135 be opposed to subsidies, if you are op- posed to subsidies in the whole program. But, I wonder where North Carolina and South Carolina would. be today if they did not have the subsidies on cot- ton and if they did not have the subsidies on peanuts. It is all right.to be against subsidies when you are against subsidies in the other fellow's backyard, but I wonder what the economy of the Caro- linas would be today if they did not have these subsidies. Their very economy depends upon these subsidies, and yet the Secretary of Cornrnerce is hiding behind this telegram which was sent to Mr. MCCORMACK, Mr. BURKE: and myself. This is the'law of the land. This law was passed in 1946. It was the will of the Congress that we subsidize ship- building in this country and, yet, the Secretary of Commerce, Mr. Hodges, hides behind a telegram of this nature. ffere we have been during the last .3 weeks pondering and delaying, and today they came in with a compromise bill adding another $187 million to a bill that carries close to $4 billion in it that we are giving away to the nations of the world. Yet, in our area we have 5,000 people who are about to be unemployed, and we are asking for $14 million out of the $18 million that they have of surplus funds. I appeal to Mr. Hodges, the Secretary of Commerce. I appeal to Mr. Martin of the Maritime Commission to reconsider this matter. Think of the welfare of our area. Think of the economy of the area. Think of the dark and gloomy Christmas and Thanksgiving holidays that are going to come for the families of these men whom it is our duty to try to help. Yes, we should help the under- privileged nations of the world, but let us help those at home too. Mr. BURKE of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield? Mr. O'NEILL. I yield to the gentle- Mr. BURKE of Massachusetts. I de- sire to associate myself with the remarks of my distinguished colleague from Mas- sachusetts. I concur in every statement that he has made here today. In Quincy, Mass., and in the East Boston section, we have approximately 5,000 men who are about to lose their jobs. These conditions are especially to be de- plored when we realize that merely by a stroke of the pen, the Secretary of Com- merce, Luther Hodges, could approve this subsidy, and I remind my colleagues he would be approving this subsidy un- der. the law of the land, the law that pro- vidds that these ships should be built here In the United States. The employ- merit that would be afforded by the building by these ships would take care of 3,000 men. The drain on the unem- ployment eampensation funds alone, if these 3,000 teen lose their jobs, will ap- proximate close to $6 million, and it will mean a loss oi, over $27 million in sala- ries to these workers. It also means a loss in corporatl n taxes to the state and the Nation. And, of course, a loss in individual income taxes to the U.S. Treasury. Yet, we, find Secretary of Commerce Luther Hodges sitting down there quietly, unconcerned about the plight of these men, heads of families Approved For Release 2005/06/29 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000600070001-4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE 20137 pervision over the use of public funds, and Welfare, the Department of Agri- logical advances as well as ,x litical in- And they have a constitutional responsi- culture-all the large departments and tentions, thus creatin, ma. r obstacles bility, above all, to define the limits of many of the smaller ones not only have in the field of evaluation ar udgment. Executive power. special needs for intelligence, but capa- Judge Learned Hand coin well have I do not propose to discuss any in- bilities for producing it as well. been talking about intcllige :? and pol- formation based on classified matters. In short, intelligence is not just al icymaking when he ob: erved I do not intend to venture in my pre- source of concern to the Department of Life Is a series of judgment: ;:.ed on in- pared remarks toward the brink of Defense. Virtually every department or 1 sufficient evidence. classified information, and I will not re- agency has some intevrest in collecting in- fer to published information regarding formation which may be of use in quid-! So The is purpose policymakking an . i,itelliCellik ~r ce organ intelligence activities of this country ing its daily actions. And, further, just ization The is to make the evide ce as organ-' is founded on speculation-even about everyone is a potential producer of where that speculation may be, to my intelligence. In the private sector, busi- E plete as possible-and this s,;ould be the personal knowledge, well founded. ness and industry energetically collects' aim of our intelligence co.usdunity at I will offer, at the conclusion of my information and processes it to bear on F all times, and especially in lays of ten- remarks, a resolution for the establish- economic decisions. The major task that sion and global peril. ment of the type of committee I have in faces this Government. if it is to have a Accepting the analogy o i he wheel, or cycle, let us begin a d