GENERAL COMMENTS ON DRAFT SPEECH - - SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01495R000100140022-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
July 7, 2005
Sequence Number: 
22
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 22, 1969
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01495R000100140022-5.pdf44.06 KB
Body: 
Z Approved For Re a 2005/07/22:CI RDP80B01495R000.100140022-5 IAW 22 May 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Intelligence SUBJECT General Comments on Draft Speech-- Senate Foreign Relations Committee 1. This speech is a frontal attack against the Department of Defense's expressed intelligence justi- fications for the Safeguard program. As such, it seems designed and constructed sharply to cut ground out from beneath the Administration'.s position on Safeguard, and to cause those Senators who have not yet made up their minds to doubt the Administration's. ..credibility. 2. The "authoritative" source of the rebuttal intelligence used in the speech transparently is CIA, although the United States Intelligence Board is the only intelligence entity named in the speech. 3. The writer or writers show skill and care in choosing which of the Defense Department's intelli- gence points to refute. The attack hits hard and accurately at most of Defense's principal "threat" arguments in their most vulnerable quoted expressions. 5. Whoever the writer, he had access to and used-- verbatim in many instances--the answers provided to the Gore subcommittee's questions. He probably also had access to the transcript of the Director's 23 April appearance before that group. The answers to the Gore subcommittee's questions were stamped TOP SECRET- BRUCE C. CLARKE, Jr. Director Strategic Research 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/07/22 : CIA-RDP80B01495R0001.00140022-5