REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATIOM

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP90-00610R000100040001-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 12
• Document Creation Date: December 14, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 17, 2002
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: February 22, 1956
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2002/10/10: CIA-RD
Calendar No. 1595
84TH CONGRESSI
2d Session J
JOINT COMMITTEE ON CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
REPORT
COMMITTEE ON
RULES AND ADMINISTRATION
UNITED STATES SENATE
EIGHTY-FOURTH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION
S. Con. Res. 2
TOGETHER WITH THE
INDIVIDUAL VIEWS OF MR. HAYDEN
I REPORT
No. 1570
FEBRUARY 23 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1956.-Ordered to be printed
UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1956
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
28 JOINT COMMITTEE OAT CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
CONCLUSIONS AND REC02MMENDATION
A Joint Committee on Atomic Energy was established because of
the particular nature of the nuclear problem and the fact that the
Federal Government was forced to go into private business on a mas-
sive scale. This had important domestic implications in a broad
range of fields. The intelligence activities, which it is proposed be
subject to a joint committee's scrutiny, are peculiarly the prerogative
of the Executive and intimately associated with the conduct of the
foreign relations of the country.
I am firmly convinced that Congress now, through its regular com-
mittees on Armed Services and on Appropriations has the opportunity
to get the necessary information from the Central Intelligence Agency
and the designated members of those committees are doing so without
in any way endangering the security of the information given them.
We must also remember that the Central Intelligence Agency carries
on its work outside the United States boundaries. Many of its agents
are in constant physical danger. 'G'4e, as Members of Congress, must
do our part to see that the work is carried on wisely, efficiently, and
with due security to the persons who are working in the interests of
our Government.
The contacts between the Central Intelligence Agency and the
Congress should never be allowed to prejudice or compromise the
highly secret work of that Agency. What the Congress has needed, to
know in the past it has been told. What the Congress will require to
know in the future it can obtain through means already in existence.
A new joint committee will only complicate the process.
For the above stated reasons I voted against reporting Senate
concurrent resolution 2 to the Senate and urgently recommend that it
be not agreed to.
CARL HAYDEN.
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-006.1 OR000100040001-2
ApprovedFor8elease-2002/I0Pf0 : CIA-RDP90-006108000100640001-2-
 I
p car _me eor Kelea.se=zuuz/1un1u~ZZPC=r 7P1 vt76~.crrtt~tfv4UiLa4uui~Js-"
Ipv 14A
more precisely, presiden
tial responsibil- Government unde,- the Comtitution. To
Representatives, by Mr. Bartlett, one of the contrary, in my judgment, if.presi
, announced that the
Itsreading clerks When it is openly stated by the Secre? dents had more frc quenti exercised this`
Speaker had affixed his signature to the tary of the Cabinet, Mr.- Rabb, that the Permissive right, it would have,. in. fact;.
following enrolled bills and joint reso- President has concentrated upon 5 per- strengthened theta- with the Con gre
lution, and they were signed by the cent of his tasks giving what time he has and with the country.
8''
President pro tempore: to spare to-the other 95 percent, there - What we see developing noun is rather
S. 1740. An act to authorize the payment is indeed a grave cause for concern. Let frightenirig. We =2ave the. ;.ccretary to
from the employees, Iife-h7suranr r,,,,a
f us hope, in the name of charity that M
- the a-1--_
s__ _
r
t
O
even a only au per- President of the United States concen-
mission in making certain beneficial also- cent of the delegated or discarded du- traces his time and effoa?s: oaf,about- 5
elation assumption agreements and to ties-and here, Mr. President I
extend th
use th Percent of l
ti
e
i
e
a
me for makih
c executive dthih
,uies, wcng suc agree - words that were used by Mr. Raab in the -means, of course Ar
the - means:
um s used by;
inti
ervew-were to be vested in appointed to the, White House spokesma.a are correct
importation n automobiles and party, tree, personnel, the thesis of the editorial ill the President delegates to others the rest i
Of of Wall auurpmobiles when intended solely for show strikiing. Street Journal. still remains of .his duties. SO what we really ltave'
g.
% going On
i
th
.
n
H R. 5005. An act to
e Government i3 a pro
suspend for 2 years - Mr. President, I should lie to quote cedure whereby much' of the executive
the duty on crude chicory and to a
mend from the editil
ora:
the Tariff Act of 1930 as it relates to - administration is being baecl}~.d not by
the Ta r Executive privilege is a matter that the Persons elected- to office by the people of 1
H
Congress and th
H 8794 A
th
.
e executive bh h
n act to providxe
e United Stat" bt bt
..e emptionsrancave.es,uy appointees in - from the tax imposed onadmi a eke f
locked horns on a number of times
and un: the various ech
l
'
,
or ad-
e
ons of exec utwe
n l
organ--.7 P" loe to certain musical and dramaticess we are greatly mistaken. Congress has izatfon. When the Congress seeks a re-i
Peerformances and eertainathietic events never conceded that, as a matter of broad -.view, in effect, of what yiicasc=
r.R+9821_An act to amend and Iul le- policy` the executive branch has a-blanket have been a'.:.. 1 Per_
ma
errrq ed
July 11 Presidents have done so--mostl ? Lion which pertains to the lr .ictivime
. 1916 (39 Stet. 350. as amended and y for politi-
supplemented, and the act approved June 29, '.'la reasons to keep the opposition from mak , what are we met with?
, We are met
1956 (70 Stat. 374), to authorize sppropria_ in,
t much sunny hay-and when Presi_ With the plea; of executive We Nrivilege
bona ,foe continuing the construction a. dents have refused, the majority in Con- I shall not sa
I41 .
1
y,
President tht
a tt1 -highways, and for other purposes; and gress did- not think the Issue Important der - the separation-Of-powers doctrine-
m" H. J.Res.347 A enough to settle the question whether there , the present President or any other Pr
es--7
resolution, author- Is actually any legal right to executive privi -ident does not have .a. Conti i.driona2?fight
lung - the President to Invite the several .lege, or like Topsy, it just grew.
States and foreign countries to take part in a . ? ._ to raise such a plea. I doubt if 1 Would
the Pourth International Automation Con- My ,comment here, Mr. President, is, go so far as the Wall Street -rnur 1 .
grass and Exposition to be I-A - .-_ 4u- - .
f
-
rom fairly reflect the situation. ;But what 1 wish to suggest Lti that are
Jun June 13, 1958. There have been many,
individual can abuse a Permisive grant Thd fact
motors, on both sides of the aisle, who -'that under the enncttt?ti.,,, i
_e
s
tion
-arse :.bat we have permitted the prac- -.' I think that Is what Is LLhal,Pssi' = ber
certain newspapers. In my judgment, tice of executive privilege to grew rn,n_
they have riocemu.i +i,..-a aa___ ._ _ a...... ...L -_- ~. -
a
...
eau:d4 o . lFf gzjr,o a asg2@O c g-i pWlwe'o as nnd'er'the a eyaof Of the United.'
 .
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD SENATE sprit
~
The=trend tobi "
~' a ~ ~ -
c~ a +aear r awb-w, ,.- an oeptemoer 1955. He his administration--an inereasing1 ins -per- r. Eisennhow how yr rue wrarsiare: attacks:
y - on Mr, Eisenhower as a do-little" leader-, r:.
set"out deli6distely, to replace President T u-> -tent role these dava as the . P ..I,[-+ ,e+.
-- --a a -^ --- - 1-??-1- -a,- . ane rasxs 01 tae President wou,d-at,il make
ihae come its a breed known as special assist ?es and boil down policy recommendations ,it the moat ditacult job in the yarid." -
%;!ant9-.. Or:.; consultants...-.In. 1953_ nn1w l -_to a-few real choices- nr n A-- He
-+o _-__--. What ..>a.a,,, ?uoy yr true tasks the President perrorau :,.rid dis~-
"to- reduce -their ailing Chief's Workload-a - - don't make the decisions. What they do,. as card them or delegate them to oUiai s," Con.
:taakthey're ptill'concerned with now. they seer it. is studv an issue mill. +?oa+l .. +.._
--r- --il r,:auuag aria v. s..' urg specldeationa
VILMbed from 250 to 294 just before Mr.- more Often, Sherman Adams and company for fish hatcheries or the,gchedu;e of Concerts-
Eisenhower was stricken. By mid-tars ,+ thrash out the 1Aauas mrtl, +r,e
.
ae
as the Dulles-3tasaen dispute that ended officials complain, too, Mr. Eisen
His?heart,attack. however' nnirYena.i +1,. --With Harold afr,.nan+. ...4,,,,.?+, - ko
Adams. j -- --.---~~,-?-. ruouuvwerpvraonaiiysettles and relieve the President of a?y4,??ving overs dispute -within his administration, such 300 such. measures eaci year
s~ rasxa Qura
WbitA Hou
;lines are brought --` ?' 1e* vuncenlratea W. the prat S years-.T ?~
eon, psychological warfare adviser. Two . B before the Cabinet, If they giving what time he has to spare to the other
others..eeonnmie aid f-hr,al 0-.,,,,- .._-, - `touch nn dnmm+4
ousayy eaperti a.-utier,now-listed as wr,.u &"a recession, nor example-.or to -ths _- ^.? - x..'~.. :-'
Special Assistants. were National Securlty` f-Mn,nn,l -ir +l Mr 1Ur, 1D C>~ wry `'
5
o
e
C
2rWs :and Arthur Laz?son, nombgaIIan ad---for actual pollcymakin , ablest Unfortunate that in the matte! or test
y $. IIsuall lie abides
M;v ing
iaer on c o l d - w a r , propaganda;"but actually-by MSjarit?sentiment ', fir. nuclear- weapons we have allowed the -:
merit, Lt. Gen.Elwood Quesaday Adviser to mum. More than hie two=lmmedlate prede- r 'Ms, Pre, Sd
r JVrr.
ceseors, Mar: Eisenhower relies FF,AT ,
the President on Airports and Air Traffi C
rnt ~t i
oa bi
,
oirdlnat.-~Goveinment atters u ? e? cv- appointed the Hratsecres Ale ,aas- ._ay?+~,14zrar. we all Kn.)w that i,he people
he involve secretary the Cabinet has of. this Nation and of
more than one Federal arencv: ...,Involve
the Western world
are, ever had, ubiquitous Max Rahn, i ha,- ,,,,.. n+.,.-.,
e
P_ 1 Pro ya -- Hoes ~ r r ? ;, c arches and temples and syn; rogues,
' The extent of the staff work in the Cab--- tha we have allowed Ourselves, to be
t HHarrcx rs:aosrr . In.+ ---- . .
r util' WlaUa
Of the State and Agriculture Departments on ; to Cabinet officials In advance attending !Laster- > services is, their
- Vnited States surplus far
m di
h
~? - -- -----_? ?- .-,.-r.......' ..guar+u tun ir?e
G
for gaOm Glad pea[.[: arid the
em John S.Bragdon,: example, keeps as manage the -.Cabinet's affairs: And individual worth of the person. It is
eye on Public works planning by some 42 Rabb has an assistant,' career civil servant-
_ r-~~ >oaa au eaun r?eaerai
de-e rent,lev l Consultaata anmdpnOh ffi1,,+ a .. $a*tme* known as the special assistants: } In any event, it.would certainly seen
.
P
-,
ia ed. by the - fast- that they , now have.-
^ so, Once- personnel management will TO carry out Cabinet decisions. a
- - ape,,x,r ---- -- 1, ro+pen their presents. -a enemy fuse' oe trial; the soviet'- an
Praj due:to account for 145workers=-` tion at. the meeting, :He - even briefs. Mr..-:nouncement, after the Soviet Limon had
one-thtrdof the total."Wbite,House payroil__ Eisenhower'just. before the. Cabinet session Completed its nuclear tests, Was prompt
itself. r
at`a cost?'of $1,450,000 for the year Ex it
e
as special projects=with a; budget, all the sub-Cabinet, a CO t nth trick on the part of the Soviet i7Aign,
I group composed of de
own;'TAlmost-100 People-Went to work for Pastmental under secretaries, to screen- 1s-. and that the attitude. ~tY Mr suJles-and_
thie'branch .when it was started in 1956, sues that will be brought before the Cabinet.;;,:,.?, ~ President may be to solve "xtent
crer[[at Delp, -- . -~- -U u,;ner write 1touse stall mem- Of course, it may lie
st new White?House branch-waa.born known hers, depending on the !agu thsi tii- IS' A
n - (Jerry) Persons, thePresideat's Rabb rides herd on -these .special: assist r those sets au p uvei
Ambassador to -Capitol Hill, drop in to see ants to-_iee that.- new policies are- imple.?, ggn,I,ess we take the Ie:ldershits an plans
hhss severallzmes a.,,... +,;
more cautious about barging In-on the Pres- to us from foreign Countries:' and that France is desperately tr~.in$ to
genii .,-YOU -Just t dent goo in to see him on Mr: Eisenhower is turning over more' of. "`develop one. Other nations also may
Wo .+u v aousestau techniques-be-1- the atomic ra
ce later on.
students of We Knee that
wen at any finis `ant since his lug given to noliticai eoi nre-... 12x,+?4? _, _
???,._ a uwr 4o open to -?-~u~, a++u do arum up euggestions:fot= fu ` l-1-unament before t.h,-. United
jhua at- an. times. Other staff men who spe- rthre Cabinet topics, f,, r'Nations and Other pubic Yortlriis of the
s cialize in-one field or another. may see him Mr Rabb is proud of the Cabinet organize World, and unless we face the it a[iecshlp .$
,nf i76tf at few times aweek~-sdmetimea even less "430n:. ?Hardly a week oassea.?? in-trving to cfinr, .,;-I
ti*F
g, one s^*+hnwes lieuten his duties as leader of the Repubifcas Party eventually have the hydrogen be rr,b, and
Y' Feast xpiains. Since' the President's stroke "to br
i
e
h
o
a ass
n t
sants, to
. The White House an
e situaition may be out of co'Iti'a1..
Mw; erTaid saM 'the tendency Me been to ewer to charges from GOP aolitiena +l;a+ +,,. i lase
$[rlntasieethc'Chief r ' ?" 1D +++++rcesasose rise chiefly been to columnist,Walter Lipp! lann, had t r Say
make, not. Eisenhower, but Mr. Adams more about the matter An his -1)
"Nevertheless staff mecnbeaa ass d
b avallabie to t
a
1
h
ro
1
1ri pui~
em. Mr Adams now eats
x to check something with -the President 10= more Republican. lawmakers with ?rin a+ Iished In the Washington Post tills nern="-
-
- ?--?+.. es- er regular ??'?'??g on.._..? - r~ Pearson said in his eolurln in the Wash.
Ling with, sayhis- Cabinet, the National The, President's associates still are search ington Post this morribig. '.It tonr.ains
Security Council or GOP legislative itadera -,.for ways to cut ._-
q.., .~,.-?- .-. -'s~,7 r,,;?'. t _ ~'f'.o u r- > "'Se ui? a r~t$ - aT.
y~- '1 --'-:. ?'?..5~?
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP9 -00610R000100040001-2
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
Contents of Legislation File
1. Paper by Harold P. Green, INFORMATION CONTROL AND ATOMIC
POWER DEVELOPMENT, published 1956.
2. Pamphlet WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT AEC SECURITY,
Revision, June 1957
3. House Report 2639, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, to accompany B. R. 9757
4. Joint Committee Print, December 1956, Atomic Energy Legislation
Through 84th Congress.
5. Letter dated 8 Jan 1959 from DCI to Stans, Director of BOB, Su` ject:
Views on the Atomic Energy Commission's draft Omnibus Bill for 1959
6. Letter from AEC, dated 28 November 1958, to Stans, BOB
7. Pamphlet by Becker and Huard, Vol. 44, No. 1, November 1955. TORT
LIABILITY AND THE ATOMIC ENERGY INDUSTRY
8. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Security, March 24 1955, AEC-1, 'CDA
Relationship
9. House Report 2660, Atomic Weapons Rewards Act of 1954, 16 Aug. 1954
10. P. L. 82-235, An Act, Amending the Atomic Energy Act of 1946
11. House Report 1104, Atomic Energy. Act amendments, 8 Oct 1951
12. Senate Report 894, Atomic Energy Act, 8 Oct 1951
13. Hearing before JCAE, Patent Aspects of the Atomic Energy Act
31 March 1950
14. P. L. 79-585, For the development and control of atomic energy
15. Joint Committee Print, Report on the Conference on the Statute of the
International Atomic Energy Agency, January 1957, 85th Congress, 1st cession
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
16. Senate Report 413, Principal Office Building for Atomic Energy
Commission, 6 June 1957
17. P. L. 85-287, To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
to increase the salaries of certain executives of the AEC, and etc.
18. Letter to DCI, dated 16 Jan 1959 from Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Atomic Energy), Subject: Joint Atomic Information Exchange Group
19. Letter to Assistant Secretary of Defense, from DCI, dated 24 Dec. 195 ,
Subject same as above.
20. Letter to McCone, AEC, from DCI, dated 4 Aug 1958, Subject:
Amendment to section 143 of Atomic Energy Act of 1954
21. Memo for the Record, dated 10 Feb 1958, Subject: Atomic Energy
Legislation , signed by LRH
22. Letter from Mr. Houston, dated 29 January 1958, to Ramey, JCAE
23, Letter to Mr. Houston, dated 28 January 1958, from Ramey, JCAE
24. Letter to Strauss, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, from Pastore,
Chairman, Subcommittee on Agreements for Cooperation, dates 28
January 1958.
25. Letter dated 3 March 1957, from DCI, to Strauss, AEC
.26. Letter to DCI, dated 15 Feb 1957 from Chairman, AEC
27. Letter to Jones, BOB, dated 16 Nov 1956, from Norman Paul,
Legislative Counsel
28. Letter to Cook, AEC, dated 1 Sept. 1956, from Cabell, Acting DCI
29. Letter to DCI from Cook, AEC, dated 24 Aug 1956
30. Letter to Jones, BOB, from Paul, Legislative Counsel, 30 July 1956
31. Senate Report 2530, Amending Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 11 Ju'. y 195+1
To accompany S. 4203
32. S. 4203, Calendar No. 2569, In the Senate, 11 July 1956, To amend
Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100040001-2
33. Memo from Director Legislative Program, Secretary of Defense,
to Speaker Rayburn, Subject: Legislative and Public Affairs
34. Memo for DCI from Legislative Counsel, 13 July 1956, Subject:
Amendment to the Atomic Energy Act
35. Letter to Anderson, JCAE, dated 11 July 1956, from DCI
36. Memo for Mr. Houston from
Energy Statute, dated 27 June 1956
Subject: International Atomic
37. Memo for Mr. Houston, from Legislative Counsel, 7 June 1956
Subject: Atomic Energy Amendments
25X1
38. Letter from Cabell, dated 25 May 1956 to Strauss, AEC
39. Letter to Brundage, BOB, dated 25 May 1956 from Cabell
40. Letter to Strauss, AEC, dated 8 Sept. 1955 from Cabell
41. Letter to Jones, BOB, dated 24 May 1956, from Paul, Legislative Counsel
25X1 42. Memo for the Record by
OGC, 2 May 1956, Subject: A, E. Act of 54
43. Memorandum for General Counsel from Asst. Director /Scientific
Intelligence, dated 13 April 1956, Subject: Justification for Rev_sion
to Provisions of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which Limits Exchange
of Restricted Data with DOD Personnel
25X1 44.
25X1
Memo for Record from Q OGC, dated 22 March 1956, Subjs-,ct:
AEC - Clearance Duplication
45. Memo for Deputy Director (Intelligence) dated 2 April 1956, from
Mr. Houston, Subject: Atomic Energy Commission Clearances
46. Memo for Deputy Director (Support, dated 31 January 1956, from
OGC, Subject: Security Problems with AEC
47. Memorandum for the Record, dated 25 January 1956, by lI OGC, 25X1
Subject: AEC - Accessibility of Restricted Data Between DOD Personnel
and Those with Que Clearances from other Agencies.
48. Memo for Record, 18 Jan 1956, by
Deputy General Counsel, AEC
Subject: Meeting with Fer2uson,25X1
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100040001-2
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100040001-2
49. Memo for General Counsel, 12 Jan 1956, from Asst. Dir. Scientific
Intelligence, Subject: Transmission of Restricted Data to DOD Non-Que
Cleared Personnel
50. Memo for Director, 12 January 1956, from Mr. Houston, Subject
CIA Briefings of JCAE
51. Suggested Draft for AEC Letter to Atty. General Re. clearances.
52. Memo to attn: 25X1
Office of Genera L3 unse u aec Operational /Legal, Legal Problems
Relating to Peacetime Uses of Atomic Energy, 8 November 1956, JSW
53. Memo for Director, dated. 7 Feb 1955, by Mr. Houston, Subject:
54.
Memo for Chairman, U. S. Atomic Energy Commision, from DCI
Subject: Removal from the Restricted Data Category of Information
Concerning the Atomic Energy Program of Other Nations.
55. Draft No. 1 of two drafts of language suggested by the Atomic Energy
Commission and forwarded by us to the Committee. 1 July 1954
56. Letter to Cole, JCA.E, dated 25 June 1954, from DCI
57. Draft 'r 1 and Draft #Z of Section 142 e in the legislation submitted to
JCAE
58. Memo for Director, dated 12 June 1954 from Mr. Houston, Subj 2ct:
Atomic Energy "Restricted Data" and Its Relationship to Intelligence Into
59. Draft dated 4 June 1954 of Memo for DCI from Mr. Houston, Subject:
Definition of Atomic Energy "Restricted Da.taP1 and its Relationship
to Intelligence Information
25X1,
60. Memo for Deputy Director (Administration), from Pforzheimer, dated(?)
Subject: Fifteenth Semiannual Report of the Atomic Energy Commission
61. Letter to Director of BOB, dated 21 December 1953, from Pforzheimer 25X1
62. Memo for Mr. Amory, 17 December 1953, Subject: Draft of Atomic
Energy Legislative Amendments
63. CIA Comment Concerning Amendments to the Atomic Energy Act of
1946, -17 December 1953
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100040001-2
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100040001-2
64. Letter to DCI from Jones, BOB, dated 2 Dec. 1953
65. Memo for Executive Secretary, National Security Council 2 Aug 1951
from I Sub?ect
67. Memo for Record, 18 June 1951, by Pforzheimer, Subject: Exchange-
of information in the field of atomic energy
68. Memo for File, from Chadwell, Asst Director Scientific Intelligence,
26 April 1951, Subject: Conversations between Messrs. Lay and
Gleason, NSC, and Messrs. Houston and Pforzheimer,
and Dr. Chadwell, on 25 April 1951 at 1500 hours.
69. Letter to Chairman, AEC, from Comptroller General, 30 Dec=mbea 49,
Controller of AEC salary rate
70. Letter from Chairman, AEC, to Warren, Comptroller General. dated
15 December 1949
71. Memo to Director, from Pforzheimer, 9 June 1948, Subject: Budget
request of the AEC. House Appropriations Committee report.
72. Letter dated 7 May 1948, from Executive Director to Staats, BOB,
Comments on S. 1004, to amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1946.
73. "Title 11 - Atomic Energy, Chapter 1 - Atomic Energy Commission,
Part 70 - Definition of Fissionable Material, from Chairman, AEC.
74. Memo for Director from Pforzheimer, dated 11 Feb 1948, Subject:
Functionsr.of the Atomic Energy Commission
75. Memo for Executive Director, dated 2 Feb 1948, from Executive for
Inspection and Security, Subject: FBI Clearance of Personnel
76. Memo for Executive Director , 30 September 1946, from Chief,
Legislative Liaison Branch, Subject: Clandestine Activities in the
Field.of Atomic Energy
77. Memo for DCI dated 24 September 1946, from Legislative Liaison
Subject: Summary of Memo dated 23 Sept 1946, Intelligence Imalicapio1Ls
of tApp "d< b ,924 0f1I : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100040001-2
25X1
25X1
25X1
 Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2
78. Memo for DCI, from Chief, Legislative Liaison Branch, Subject
Atomic Energy Act of 1946, dated 23 Sept. 1946
79. Memo for DCI from Legislative Liaison, dated 23 Sept, 1946, Subject:
Intelligence Implications in the Atomic Energy Act of 1946
80. Memo to Mr. Houston, from West, Office of the Chief of Staff,
Subject: Atomic Energy Legislation, 14 May 1946
81. Memo for Director, dated 29 April 1946, from General Counsel,
Subject Legislative Hearings for Atomic Energy Commission
82. Letter to West, Office of the Chief of Staff, from Mr. Houston,
26 April 1946, Subject: S. 1717 and Atomic Energy Bill.
83. Memo for File from Mr. Houston, 22 April 1946, Subject: GAG and
Unvouchered Funds
84. LEGAL PROBLEMS RESULTING FROM INDUSTRIAL USE OF ATOMIC
ENERGY.
Approved For Release 2002/10/10 : CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000100040001-2