TELEGRAM TO MRS. JAMES ANGLETON

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070238-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 4, 2001
Sequence Number: 
238
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 8, 1949
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070238-9.pdf113.97 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070238-9 OGC Has Reviewed TELEGRALZ Action, Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070238-9 Approved For Pease 2001/09/03 : CORDP84-00709R00007 8 July 1-47 WitORttTh! "C)TI ixc1irivr OFFICER, OSO nubjectt Telegram to t4:e. :amps Angleton I. min Is In answer to your memercndum of 7 July the ?bove sublottts ';(3 rind that we are unable to aorco fully with your arguments for charging thin expense to 1s loverrKzent. Particularly, In paragraph 3, you argue tt it wail necessary for us to serve as "cutout" from time to time. ict maintain that where lif4 merely act as Intermediary for personal =awes, whether for security reasons Gr otherwise, tie expenses should be borne b7 the Individua concurnedo Le In t,l'=s abaenee or obvious subterfuze or mieuso t,,fs office will never question an sdministrat.t1ve ruling on security aspects or operations. Consequently, we accept your statement that the subject telegram was net part of correspondence between the porsons involved, but was separste onerational =essase, intermediate to their morrow' pondence, whict, was requirsd in order to have Mrs* Angleton cease her efforts to get In touch with her huabends On this ground, and this ;round only, there is no legal objection to transferring this eharce for payment b7 unvouohered runda, As noted above, this in no way sets a precedent for passing ur peraunal mousawes. 3. We vish to point out that an Ltos or thli sort- tends to oast doubt on the administration or our unvouchered :fluade. The messalTe was, on its face, purely personal, and even on tne grounds f:Iven in paragraph 2 above, vie consider it a bu:oar line cant. If a message is truly operational, we belluvo it can 'noi-Taally be :pihraeed aa su040.11 which case It can 1,65 ?aid from vouchered funds when, as here, the mesaage itself did not contain classified information. LREseral liOnT1167r General Counsel Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070238-9