MILITARY , NAVAL AND AIR FORCE INSTALLATIONS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 14
• Document Creation Date: November 17, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 13, 1999
• Sequence Number: 21
• Content Type: OPEN

';',111.SSIONAL RECORD ? HOUSE 7921
mission w ? Abo 10- ror- EC nutfitr''''''rite'lliffelafeetafr
er5 Obtain irChcatTeactioafii?47ntirgori . After general debate,
0604)eld-8.01
.0A40,Dtiav_g:citFor-ermilionco lnnnq
public, whosfollOtarial duties are confined at the conference oh the disagreeing votes continue not to exceed ours, to equally
scilf?Jy to District of Collin:able, bUigneSS, of the two Houses on the amendinents rerr'clivided and controlled by the chairman and
,s,
the House to the bill (S. 727) to a.djust the ,. ranking minority member of the Committee
then the bond 'obtained btt the.COMMie- salaries of the Judges of the Municipal Court, 'on Armed Services, the bill shall be read for
siondrs shall be in lieu Of4that required of Appeals for the District of Columbia-; amendment under the 5-minute rule. At the
by law ' ? ,.',., a' e ? , the Municipal Court for the District oV' _conclusion of the consideration of the bill,
The bill was ordered,t0A8 yelicl a third Columbia, the Juvenile Court of the District for amendment, the Committee shall flee and
time, was read the thirdtrine,and pas report the bill to the House with such.
sed, of Columbia, and the District of Columbia .:
&Ind a motion to reconsider was laid on Tax Court. submit the following statement , amendments as may have been adopted, and '
the table - - , in explanation of the effect of the action the previous question shall be considered as,
agreed upon by the conferees and recom- ordered on the bill and amendments thereto
mended in the accompanying conference to final passage without intervening motion
report: except one motion to recommit. o
The first section of the Senate bill In- Mr. COLMER. I yield 30 minute's to
'
creased the salary of the chief judge of the the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Atiattil!.
Municipal Court of Appeals for the District and pending that I yield myself suc
of Columbia from $14,500 to $20.000 per an. - - . -?-.i,
num, and the salaries of the judges of stick time as I may consume.
court from $14.000 per annum to $19,500 per. Mr. Speaker, this is an open rtile''as?
annum. The corresponding section of the the reading would indicate providing for
House amendment provided an increase to 3 hours of general debate and then, the
$17,500 for the chief Judge and to $17,000 reading of the bill in Committee of the
for the Judges of such court. The confer- Whole under the 5-minute rule for
ence agreement fixes the salary of the chief amendment. -
judge to be 819.000 and the salaries of the .
judges to be $18,500. Mr. Speaker, this is a very important
Section 2 of the Senate bill Increased the piece of legislation. It is very extensive
salary of the chief Judge of the Municipal in its scope. I wonder at times whether
Court for the District of Columbia from We really appreciate the full significance
$13,500 per annum to $19,000 per annum, and of these tremendous authorizations and
the salaries of the judges of the Municipal appropriations. This one bill authorizes
Court from 413,000 per annum to $18,500 per the expenditure of more money than P03-
annum. The corresponding section of the Bibb, the cost of running this entire Gov-
House amendment provided an Increase to ernment during the first 25 years of its
$10,500 for the chief judge and to $18,000 for
the judges of such court. The conference existence.
agreement fixes the salary of the chief judge The bill is divided into five titles and
or such court to be $18,000 per annum and it proposes to provide construction and
the salaries of the judges to be $17,500. other related authority for the military
Section 3 of the Senate bill (which cores- departments within and outside the
sponds to section 4 of the House amendment United States and for the Central Intel-
and the conference substitute) established ligence Agency,
the salary of the judge of the Juvenile Court ' Nr. peaker, the total authorization in
of the District of Columbia at 818,500 per this bill is for the sum of $2,368,998,900.
annum. Under existing law the salary of
such judge is fixed under the Classification Breaking this figure down, Mr.
Act of 1999, and is at present $11,800 per Speaker, the Army would be given a to-
annum. The House amendment provided tal authorization of $551,105,000. This
that the salary of the judge of the Juvenile would be further broken down so that
Court should be $14.800. The conference $238,778,000 would be allotted for use
agreement fixes the salary of such judge to be inside continental United States. The
$17,500. sum of $78,334,000 would be authorized
Section 4 of the Senate bill (which corns- for outside the United States, while
sponds to section 3 of the House amendment $223,993,000 would be authorized for
classified use by the Army and $10 mil-
lion would be authorized for emergencies.
The authorization for the Navy in this
bill would be $596,140,900. of which
$331,607,200 is proposed to be spent in
continental United States while $107,-
191,300 is to be spent outside the coun-
try. The classified allocation for the
Navy is $151,342,400 while the sum of
;8 million is proposed to be authorized
for emergency use by the Navy.
The Air Force has received the largest
MILITARY, NAVAL, AND AIR FORCE authorization, for its total in H. R. 6829
INSTALLATIONS is $1,165,453,000. Out of this sum it is
proposed that $709,480,000 be allocated
Mr. COLMER. Mr. Speaker, by dire?. for expenditure within continental
tion of the Committee on Rules, I call uP United States while $450,973,000 would
the resolution (H. Res. 286) providi for be spent outside of continental United
, and finally $5 milli
idvattimen
COMMITTEE ON THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
,
Mr. fvleMILI,AN.',Mr. Speaker, I ask
unanimous eonsent 'that tip Committee
on the DiStrict of Columbia may have
until 12 o'clock tonight to file the con-
ference report on the judges' salary, bill.
The SPEAKER. Is there objection to
the request of the gentleman from South
Carolina? .
There was no objection.
The conference report and statement
are as follows:
corcrissimcs FtsPORT (H. lazier. No. 920)
The committee of conference on the dis-
agreeing votes of the two Houses on the
amendment of the House to the bill (8. 727)
to adjust the salaries of the judges of the
Municipal Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia, the Municipal Court for the
District of Columbia. the Juvenile Court of
the District of Columbia, and the District
Coittinran. Tax Court. having met, after
toll and free conference, have agreed to rec-
ommend and do recommend to their respec-
tive HOURRA as follown:
That the Senate recede from its disagree-
ment to the amendment of the Houma to
the text of the bill and agree to the same
with an amendment as follows:
in lieu of the matter proposed to be in-
serted by the House amendment insert the
following: "That the fourth sentence of the
Sixth paragraph of section 6 of the Act en-
titled 'An Act to consolidate the Police Court
of the District of Columbia and the Munici-
pal Court of the District of Columbia, to be
known as "The Municipal Court for the Dis-
trict of Columbia", to create "The Municipal
Court of Appeals for the District o
f OoIUffi-
bia". and f.r other purposes'. approved April and the conference substitute) increased the
1, 1992. R3 amended (D. C. Code, sec. 11-711). salary of the judge of the District of Colum-
is amended by striking out 114,500' and in- his Tax Court from $13,000 per annum to
serting in lieu thereof 119.000'. and by sink- $18,500 per annum. The House amendment
tng out '$14,000' and inserting in lieu thereof increased the salary of such Judge to $18,000.
118 teal'. The conference agreement fixers the salary of
-e ? 2 The fourth sentence of section 2 such judge to be $17,500.
of such Act of April 1, 1942, as amended
ID. C. Code, sec. 11-753), Is amended by
striking out 113,500' and inserting in lieu
thereof 118,000', and by striking out '813.-
000' and inserting in lieu thereof 117,500'.
-1-3Fc. S The first sentence of the second
paragraph of section 2 of title DC of the
District of Columbia Revenue Act of 1937,
as amended ID. C. Code, sec. 47-2402), is
amended by striking out 113,000' and in-
f.ertine In lieu thereof 117,500'.
"Sr.e. 4. The last sentence of section 19 of
? to, Juvenlie Court Act of the District of Co-
lumbia ka C, Code. sec 11-920) is amended
to react as lollows. *The salary of the judge
shall be 817,500 per annum.'"
And the House agree to the same.
That the Senate recede from its disagree-
ment to the amendment of the House to the
title of the WU and agree to the same.
JOON L. MCMILLAN,
OREN IIARRIS?
SID SIMPSON,
Jos P. O'HARA,
Managers on the Part of the House.
WAYNE MORSE,
ALAN BIBLE,
ROMAN L.. HROSKA,
Managers on the Part of the Senate.
Joni( L. MCMILLAN,
OREN HARRIS,
SID SIMPSON,
Joe. P. O'HARA,
Managers on the Part of the House.
the consideration of H. R. 68y
tary, naval, and Air Force instgiatiipaealemyriflelit tyl thp mampu d provide the
and for other purposes, and ask for itigilguntoof $ ,Nit to be allocated, if au-
ettithproired, r-t-e usic of the Chairman
re s crf Staff, while title V
orize the sum of $56
th?litentral Intelligence
2Ate4411111110a10411ates the grand total
obi $2,368,998,900.
Union for the consideration of th fila6 le 40Sntlitulspitaivintfresting to hote. Mr.
e829) to authorize certain condiffini tneskert,4hat-thereport indligttee that
military, naval, and Air Force installations, the Army authorization Units year, if
authorize certain constructio t
pit
n would be
Immediate consideration.
The Clerk read the resolution, as
lows:
Resolved. That upon the adoptt
resolution it shall be in order to
the House resolve itself into theq
of the Whole House on the S
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
tthetiment No.
Review of this detunreitt by titli bet
determij.d1bat
IA has Tio fblection to declass
o It roetaios II/emotion of CA
trierest Jibe most romoin
fitiviiied at TS S
s%therily: HA 10.2
2 It contrigans sighing of CIA interest
1/, Reviewer 6.7 6/ r
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
1955 aGRESMAL RECORD- HOUS1
.7925
Approved ForRease /08/16 ? CIA-RDP89zoi3zocioo5999ppfog-eth
Command installation and it will be. in You will note at the liottom of page say am r t e
the greater Milwaukee area, Wis. ? .? 1,5 and on p g
. . Although the Department of Defense'l the committee gave special consideration
'Submitted a good program, the commit-..": to several of the controversial items
tee added certain items which are ' set? which naturally arise in every public-
,
but on page 15, ?No new tem was added ' works bill. One of these is the land ac-
tor the Air Force, but a hospital at Camp , quisition in Okinawa, another was the
Jackson, S. C., was added for,the Army, expansion of Fort Sill; two of the Navy
and the Naval' Ali;Facility at the Naval proposals involving New Iberia and Port
Academy was added for the Navy, This Chicago were also in the same category.
Is the same facility I just mentioned. A number of the members of the Mary-
This air facility ,was recommended by land and Ohio delegations were heard
the Board` of Visitors at the Naval Acad- with respect to the proposed move of
emy, as were the other two items at Ann- the headquarters of the Research and
apolis-,7an additiento Bancroft Hall and
some of the till necessary to provide ad-
ditional land area,
Another important construction item
added by the committee appears in title
IV of the bill. This would authorize the
construction or rehabilitation of five
units of housing, a communications fa-
cility and other related items for the
. chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff and four
of his assistants. At the present time all
of the Chiefs of Staff are provided with
adequate housing. For example, the
Commandant of the Marine Corps has
some 15,000 square feet in his house.
while Admiral Radford's house is some-
thing a little over 3,000 square feet.
These buildings are to be erected on
land adjacent to the Naval Observatory.
Now, in addition to that, It is recom-
mended here that $56 million be made
available to the Central Intelligence
Agency to establish a permanent build-
ing to house its activities. There are a
great number of people employed by the
Central Intelligence Agency here in the
District of Columbia, and they are being
housed in some 33 or more buildings.
Mr. Dulles, the head of the Central In-
telligence Agency, feels that being housed
In many units, as they are, jeopardizes
the security that is required. Now, you
know what the Central Intelligence
Agency is. So, we provide here an au-
thorization of $56 million for land and
a building.
Mr. GROSS. Mr. Chairman, will the
gentleman yield?
Mr. VINSON. I yield to the gentle-
man from Iowa.
Mr. GROSS. Are these buildings for
the Central Intelligence Agency, esti-
mated to cost $50 million, to be con-
structed within 30 or 35 miles of the
District of Columbia? Can the gentle-
man tell me?
Mr. VINSON. During the hearings
Mr. Dulles designated certain places.
Some were outside the District of Co-
lumbia. But, he did feel that it was
absolutely essential, in view of the char-
acter of the work he does, to be within
reasonable distance of the District of
Columbia. I would say 35 to 40 miles
from the District or probably more, but
that was the line of testimony.
rt that committee did with this bill, We worked
6 long weeks, and read every item. line
by line, in order to approve this pro7
posed atithorization of $2,369.000,000. .
It takes a long time to find out how; to
spend that, much moneY; and we 't00IC,,.
the time. ' ? ' "
We amended the bill in' 125 different
places and reduced the authorisatiOnte
quested. But when we added these ab-
thorizations in Maryland and South
Carolina. it increased the total. As I4
say, there were about. 125 amendments;
Development Command from Baltimore to the 'original bill, the total of which
to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, when it was' submitted was $2,354,000,,,'
Ohio. 000. The bill before you now, cans for
A matter of particular interest, as evi. ?, a total of $2,369,000.000, an Increase,0
denced by the mail which the commit-. ' about $14,500,000. '
tee has received, relates to the effect of In the process of its consideration, the
the Government's construction of family committee eliminated items in the.'
housing on Wherry projects.
I want to draw your attention to the
table set out on page 21 of the report,
which contains every installation at
which there is a Wherry project and
at which housing would be constructed
under this bill. If you will look at the
last column you will see that in every
Instance, even after taking into consid-
eration every conceivable kind of hous-
ing, there still is a large deficit at those
installations.
Of course, the second last column in-
dicates only about 4,500 housing unite
to be constructed at these bases. The
whole bill contains about 17,000 units,
but these other houses are to be con-
structed at bases where there is no
Wherry housing.
Last year Congress authorized 11,600
family housing units. This bill, as I saY,
will authorize about 17,000 units. They
will vary in cost, with the overall aver-
age in the United States being $13,480.
Of these 17,000 houses, 3,500 represent
replacements of quarters that can no
longer be lived in. Five thousand two
hundred and seventy-one are for officers.
and 11,700 are for enlisted men.
All of this housing will be of perma-
nent construction and located for the
most part at permanent installations.
Section 609 of the bill, appearing on
page 70, would permit a military de-
partment to acquire, upon the applica- Mr. VINSON. A great many sugges-
tion of the project owner, any Wherry tions come before the Committee on
housing project at an installation at Armed Services.' Oftentimes it seems
which housing would be constructed di- they are sowed in fertile soil and bear
rectly by the Government under this fruit. sometimes they fall among
bill. I want to draw your particular '
thorns and thistles. I am afraid that
attention to the fact that the project suggestion has fallen among thorns and
Owner has to want to get rid of his thistles. I do not think the gentleman
project and make application that it be need disturb himself about it, because
purchased by a military department be- Secretary Stevens said that he was go-
Tothis can be done. In g to examine it, he did examine it,?
To my mind a project owner would and concluded that the facts at this
probably want to have the department time did not warrant that proposal.
acquire his project only if it has proved
to be an unprofitable business venture. Mr. O'HARA of Illinois. I thank the
gtx t it gentleman. The gentleman will recall
amount of $33 million and added items
In the amount of $48 million. ?
Had it not been for the fact that we
felt the circumstances warranted it, such ","
as the hospital at Camp Jackson and ' ?
the activities at the Naval Academy, as
a result of our screening and careful
scrutiny of the bill, which we passed on
in a line by line consideration, there
would have been a reduction of $33
million.
I want to say this further. This is a
department measure_ It is recommend-
ed by the Director of the Budget. It is Pl
recommended by Mr. oete ffi
s oce,
which was created for the purpose of
scrutinizing and coordinating these pub-
lic works.
I ask that the bill be enacted because
the facts and circumstances warrant it.
It is absolutely essential to carry on this
public works construction to keep our
military forces in the shape in which
they should be kept.
Mr. O'HARA of Illinois. Mr. Chair-
man. will the gentleman yield?
Mr. VINSON. With pleasure.
Mr. O'HARA of Illinois. I notice on
page 17 of the report mention is made
of a suggestion of moving the Fifth
Army headquarters from Chicago to
Des Moines. Would the gentleman ex-
plain that?
There were about 125 amendments to In any ev
the original bill, which totaled at the is entirely a v. oluntary sot on the part that some weeks ago I telephoned him
time it was submitted. about $2,354,000,- of the private owner. when there was such a report in Chicago.
000. The bill that you have before you Mr. Chairman, I believe this is a good and asked him about it.
totals almost $2,369,000,000. This is an bill and that it represents a sound pro- Mr. VINSON. I want to compliment
increase of about $143/2 million. In the gram. It was unanimously reported by the gentleman who represents the city
process of its consideration, the corn- the House Armed Services Committee. of Chicago for being so alert. I have
mittee eliminated items in the amount I respectfully urge its passage. always known that he was right here on
of over $33 million and added items in Mr. Chairman, to show you how care- the job and his inquiry substantiates
the amount of about $48 million, fully we considered this bill, I should like my conclusion. ?
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
L_RE6401zu?Figiqusi,,'
Approved For Release zuuu/uon : J70R000500060021
.8 7941
1 91;:; 4GRESSIONA,
Mr. 'BROWNSON. Mr. Chairman, I j guidance to CIA modeled on that which (Roll No. 071
am voting "present" on the rollcall on
R. 6829, authorizing construction for
.the military departments and the Cen-
tral Intelligence Agency.
To me, this is the only sound position
open because. I have not been able to
find in the extensive hearings and the
report the facts I feel I need in order
to pass on this $2.36 billion authoriza-
tion for the purchase of more real estate
by the Department of Defense, which al-
ready holds properties costing more than
$24.8 billion with some of it being carried
at ridiculously low acquisition costs.
This holding comprises 61 percent of the
acquired real property of the United
States Government. In addition, the
Department of Defense leases 190 loca-
tions including 1,983,686 acres for which
it pays an annual rental of $19,697,000.
I cannot say that the armed services
do not need every facility provided
in the bill before us today?but, after
reading the hearings, I do have some rea-
sonable doubts. Neither can I say that
the armed services do need these facili-
ties and this land in every case.
In the brief of authorizations, under
title I, the Army lists $223,993,000, or 40
percent, of its construction authoriza-
tions as "classified." The Navy, under
title II, lists $151,342,400, or about 25
percent of its construction funds as
"classified." I am pleased that the Air
Force seems more detailed and forth-
right in its justifications throughout and
does not hide behind the term "classi-
fied" for projects most of which are being
built right here in the United States,
where all our citizens can observe daily
the steam shovels, bulldozers, and steel-
workers working on the projects so care-
fully "classified" from Congress.
I have been unable to discover just
what is the construction included in title
IV for the chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff. Evidently this $300,000 did not
appear in the original H. R. 5700 as in-,
troduced by the gentleman from
Georgia [Mr. Vnisoal, at least not in
title IV where it is now. Is this a house
for Admiral Radford? Is it an elite
housing project to provide for his per-
sonal staff, too? How many facilities
can you provide for an admiral for $300,-
000. I am not saying that this is neces-
sarily either an unwise or an unjustified
expenditure; I would just like to know
what it is for and what we get for the
money. Such items as "Chairman, JCS,
$300.000," do not explain to me what use
is to be made of the taxpayers' money
any more than I can be completely satis-
fied with general phrases such as "Op-
erational and maintenance facilities,"
"Community' facilities." and "Storage
facilities," as justifications for the ex-
penditure of billions of dollars.
I do not know whether the CIA needs a
$6 million building site and a $50 million
building, or not. I do not know or have
any idea of how many employees CIA
now has. I do not know what they do
or to whom they are really accountable.
Perhaps if I knew these things I would
want to increase the CIA construction
authorization, but I guess I will never
know. Perhaps those of us. in Congress
will, someday, create a Joint Committee
on Intelligence to provide congressional
the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy
has developed in its field. Certainly we AbbItt
exercise no controls over this super se- Abernethy
cret agency through a check on the purse Addonisio
Alger
strings. Allen, Ill.
The Committee on Armed Services de- Andersen,
serves due credit for their application
and diligent work on this piece of legis-'
lation. The hearings total 4,091 pages.
accumulated in approximately 50 hours
and 25 minutes of on-the-record hear-
ings spread over 21 days. Rapidly cal-
culating, I estimate that the committee
considered this authorization at about
the rate of $789,666 per minute of open
hearing time, an evidence of unusual
efficiency especially when you consider
that their considerations ranged from
Alaska to the Midway Islands including
the British West Indies, the Canal Zone,
Cuba, French Morocco, Hawaii, Iceland,
Italy, Japan, Johnson Island, Mariana
Islands, and the Marshall Islands in be-
tween. Without being able to tell what
went on in the off-the-record hearings,
one can wish the Army and Navy had
justified their requests as forthrightly as
the Air Force.
The Army will be authorized $551;-
105,000 in this bill as contrasted with
$236 million granted in fiscal 1955?an
Increase of over 100 percent. The Navy
will be authorized $596,140,900 in this bill
to accomplish public works as compared
with about $202 million for fiscal 1955,
an increase of well over 100 percent.
The Air Force will be authorized $1,165,-
456,000 in this bill, an'increase of more
than 300 percent over last year's author-
ization of $398,954,000.
Is this too much, or is it too little?.
Can we use this real estate instead of '
weapons against an enemy? I just do
not know. On the basis of the informa-
tion furnished me I have no Way -Cif?
reaching a sensible conclusion. So, I
voted "Present." . .
The CHAIRMAN. Under the rule the -
Committee rises. ? '
Accordingly the Committee rose, and
the Speaker having resumed the chair,
Mr. litxrcazr, Chairman of the Commit-
tee of the Whole House on the State of
the Union, reported that that Committee
having had under consideration the bill
(H. R. 6829) to authorize certain con-
struction at military, naval, and Air
Force installations, and for other pur-
poses, pursuant to House Resolution 283.
he reported the same back to the House
with sundry amendments adopted in
the Committee of the Whole.
The SPEAKER Under the rule the
previous question is ordered.
Is a separate vote demanded on any
amendment? If not the Chair will put'
them en grosse.
The amendments were agreed to.
The bill was ordered to be engrossed
and read a third time, and Was read the
third time.
The SPEAKER. The question Is on
the passage of the bill.
Mr. VINSON. Mr. Speaker. on anal
passage I ask for the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered:
The question was taken: and itberti
Were?yeas 316, nays 2, answering "pres-
ent" 2, not voting 114, as follows: -
H. Carl
Andresen,AUgUat
Andrews
Arenda
Ashley
Ashmore
Aspinall Clary ?
Auchlucltres (3111111
AveryGentry
e. George
Ayr
Gordon
Baker
Baldvrin Grant ost
Bass. N. 11;4 Green, Greif. Phillip.
, Philbin
Baas, Tenn. Gregory
Batas Griffiths Filcher'
YsAs-310 .
Fernandez ,Multer
Fin* , ' Murray, Tu.'
Fisher, 'Murray, Tenn.
Fiera . Hatcher ,
Flood lqiCh0190II
Flynt Norblad j?
Fogarty ,,Norren _
Parotid '-013rien, /IL ?
Ford , Ill.
Forrester ' O'Hara, ?map.
Fountain
Frazier ,,Dennere
Friedel ,*Oeterta
Passma
tPatrnati
Fat
Perki
Baurnhart Gross
Belmar owinn
Belcher Haley
Bell Hand
Bennett, "Fla. Harden
Bennett, Mich. Hardy Priest ?
Bantle! Harris Prouty
Berry Harrison, Va. Rabaut
Betts Hays. Ark. Radwan. '
Blatnik Hays, Ohio Rains
BOMB Hayworth Ray
Bolling Htbert Reed. III.
Bolton, Henderson Rees, Kans. ,
Frances P. , Herlong Reyes .
Bow Hess Rhodes. Arig,
Bowler , Hiestand Rhodes, Fa.
Boyle Hill Richards
Bray Trilling' Riley
Brooks, La. Hinshaw Roberti
Brown. Ga. Hoffman, Mich. Robeson, Va.
Brown, Ohio Hollfield Rodino
Broyhill Holmes Rogers, Colo.
Rogers, Fla.
Rogers. Mass.
Rogers, Tex.
Rooney
Rutherford
Sadlack
Poage
'Poff
Preston,
Price ,
Buchanan Hope
Budge HOOMILT
Burleson Huddleston
Burnside Hull -
Bush Hyde
Byrd Jarman
Byrnes, Wis. Jenkins , Saylor ?
Cannon Jennings Schenck
Carlyle Jenszn Scott -
Carnahan . Johanson Scudder ..
Carr*. Johnson, Calif. Seely-Brown,'
Cederberg . Jones. Ala. Selden ?
Cellar Jones, N. C.. Sheehan
Chelf ,Judd ' ' eihelley-?'. ?
.Chenoweth- Karsten Short '
'Chips? mid Keating' .! -.-Shuford '
Christopher' ' Sienrinski
Chudoff ,Hebly,NT, ,. Sikes'
Church Keogh ? ? " Siler .."
Clark ? Kilburn Simpson. ?"
Clevenger Kilday Sisk
Cole Kilgore
Smith, Mies.
Colmar King, Calif. ? Smith, Va.
Cooley Kirvoui Smith, Wis.
Coon Kluczynski Spence.
Cooper Krueger -Springer
Corbett Landrum ? Staggers
Coudert Lane Steed '
Cramer Lanham Sullivan
Crete's Lankford Taber
Crumpacker Latham Tails _
Cunningham LeCompte Teague, Calif.
Thomas
Thompson,
Mich.
Thompson, N. I
Thomson, Wyo.
Thornberry
Toilets= ,
Trtmhle
Tuck
Curtis, Mass. Lipscomb
Curtis, Mo, Long
Mame McCarthy
Davis, Oa. McCormack
Davis, Wis. McCulloch
Dawson, Ill. McDonough
Dawson. Utah McDowell
Deane McMillan
Delaney McVey
Dempsey Macdonald Tumult),
Derounian Machrowics Udell
Devereux Mack, Wash. Van Zaadt
Madden Vinson
Mahon Vary&
Marshall Vureell
martin Wainwright
Mason Walter
Matthew. Watts
Metcalf Weaver
Miller, Calif. Westland
/*tiller, Md. Wharton
ulna. fleht. Whitten
Wickenhaft
lamina Wldnall
adenoma Wier
Moreno Wiggieerworth
Moo Williams, Mies,
Dies
Dixon
Doniver
Dondero
Donohue
Dorn, K. T.
Dorn. S. o.
Durban
NdmondsoN
Nihon
WM.
Fallon
Phan
!awed'
Yentas
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
Th".") 5 "ONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SEM: 2.
41.
mmApipE,9.vgAggE,80.1ggsaf?AcIWW/6 tilCIATREItill 0 141 KiNe51149 n is for
ness, which is H. R. 6829. operational facilities:',=',TrOop Ipt4sink
tieve/ spoken
Mr.. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Presi-
dent. -I.suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-
Pore. The Secretary will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call
the roll.
Mr JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Presi-
dent,.I ask unanimous consent that the
order for the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-
pore, Withont objection, it is so ordered.
,
APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE MARINE
CORPS
Mr. JOHNSTON of South Carolina.
Mr. President, I wish to take this oppor-
tunity' to thank the distinguished mem-
Lers of the Senate conference commit-
tee on defense appropriations for their
successful efforts which resulted in the
preservation of funds for the Marine
Corps,
It means that the Marine Corps will
be able to keep itself in trim shape and
be ready, as it has in the past, to defend
our Nation in time of emergency.
I feel that this is a major victory for
national defense, and, while my feelings
on this matter are well known, I wish
again to thank the distinguished mem-
bers of the conference committee, and
especially the distinguished Senator
from Georgia (Mr. RussEW.
I believe this action will prove in the
future to be very beneficial to our na-
tional defense.
MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSE
A message from the House of Repre-
sentatives, by Mr. Bartlett, one of its
clerks, announced that the House had
passed the bill (S. 2090) to amend the
Mutual Security Act of 1954, and for
other purposes, with amendments, in
which it requesteu the concurrence of
the Senate; that the House insisted upon
its amendments; asked a conference
with the Senate on the disagreeing votes
of the two Houses thereon, and that Mr.
RICHARDS, Mr. MORGAN, Mr. ZABLOCKI,
Mr. Volivs, and Mr. JUDD were appointed
managers on the part of the House at
the conference.
ENROLLED BILLS SIGNED ?
The message also announced that the
Speaker had affixed his signature to the
following enrolled bills, and they were
signed by the Acting President pro tern-
pore:
it R.928. An act for the relief of Eugenio
Malda: and
If It 3194. An act for the relief of E. S.
Berney.
CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN MILI-
TARY. NAVAL, AND AIR FORCE
INSTALLATIONS
Mr. JOHNSON of texas. Mr. Presi-
dent, I ask unanimous consent that the
Senate proceed to the consideration of
the unfinished business.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-
pore. Without objection, the Chair lays
140. 312-2
The Senate resumed the consideration
of the bill (H. R. 68291 to authorize cer-
tain construction at military, naval, and ?
Air Force installations, and for, other.
purposes.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tin
pore. The question Is on agreeing to the
committee amendment, which is in the
nature of a complete substitute for the
bill.
Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, the
Senate is considering the so-called mili-
tary construction bill for the budget year
1956.
The purpose of the bill is to authorize
construction by the military departments
and the Central Intelligence Mena in
a total amount of $2,357,313,300. This
authorization is distributed $527,027,000
for the Army; $571,620,300 for the Navy;
$1,205,170,000 for the Air Force; and
$53,500,000 for the Central Intellipnce,
rinvite attention of Senators
L?he fact that the committee report
contains a breakdown by States and by
military department of the authoriza-
tions contained in this bill. The bill as
introduced at the request of the Depart-
ment of Defense totalled $2,354,352,300.
However, subsequent to the bill's intro-
duction, the Department requested
amendments increasing the authoriza-
tion by some ;41 million. These amend-
ments were for the purposes of providing
additional facilities to accommodate the
Increased production of B-52's recently
approved by the Congress, and to provide
facilities for a new technique in air de-
fense. Thus, despite the fact that the
committee has made changes in the bill,
our reductions unfortunately have been
largely obscured by the addition of the
authorizations requested after the bill
was introduced.
In round figures, the pending bill as
now presented is $28 million under the
total budget estimate submitted, and $11
million, in round figures, under the bill
as it passed the House.
The reductions and additions made by
the committee are set forth in the com-
mittee report. in summary form at the
end of the title to which they pertain. At
the conclusion of my statement, I shall
be glad to discuss any item in which any
Senator is particularly interested.
In the Army title, $160 million, or 30
percent of the program, is for continu-
ing the antiaircraft facilities commonly
known as nike sites. Sixty-four million
dollars is for troop housing and troop
support facilities. Eighty-eight million
dollars is for family housing, $38 mil-
lion is for land acquisiton. Twenty-six
million dollars is to continue construc-
tion in Alaska and Okinawa, two of our
most important strategic areas today.
The remaining authorization, apprgx,irs
mately 30 percent of the total, is intended,
to provide facilities for research and deu"
velopment, training, community facili- ?
ties, medical facilities, and other miscel-
laneous requirements.
The Navy title, which totals $571 mil]
lion, constitutes another step in the pro
gram to keep the Navy's shore establislei,-?
ment adequate to service its ships, alfi"
craft, and weapons. Approximately sawmill itY
Docapieui Ner
which means barrackkaiidtachelor.offi-i?
Hon. Family housing iiiikes up $56
lion of the total. The remainder of the,
Navy program Is for, land acquisitions,
research and development, ' training' fit:
cillties, the acquisition of aViga,t1911.4,eas,
ments around naval air Stations;,"a:poll
tion abatement program, and 10 We
and recreational facilities.c?
The Air Force authorization
than that of the Army and ,
combined. As Senators know,
striving for a 137-wing Air Foree,,
This Air Force construction progi
Intended to provide the additional fad
ties to support that force level-1:1;4,A
Force construction is spread among 25[
bases-151 are in the United States' an
104 overseas. There are two new '13sist
in the Air Force program. One..it?
Buckingham Weapons Center in Florida
and the other a new Air Defense baSeIn
the Milwaukee, Wis., area. As has been
true in recent years, the Strategic Air
Command gets a lion's share of the Air
Force authorization. Viewing the pro-
gram from categories of construction,
airfield pavements is by far the largest
Item.
Title IV of the bill authorizes the con-, .
struction of a headquarters installation
for the Central Intelligence Agency. I
believe it is widely recognized, in Con-
gress at least, that the Central Intelll-
gence Agency is scattered among several
temporary buildings in Washington, and
that It could operate more effectively
and economically in buildings designed to
suit its requirements.
There is local opposition to some of
the items in this bill, principally those?
pertaining to land acquisition. The
committee has afforded everyone who ad-
vised us of his desire to do so, an op-
portunity to testify. Committee action
on the more controversial items is sum-
marized in the committee report on page
11. Some of our decisions were diffi-
cult ones and we claim no infallibility.
We have, however, exercised our best '
judgment, bearing in mind the require-
ments of national defense and the views
of the persons most directly affected by
our actions.
Of special significance, I think, is the
housing authorization contained in this
bill. Scattered throughout titles 1, II,
and III are authorizations for the con-
struction of almost 17,000 units of mill-
tary family housing. In the realization
that this request constitutes only a small
part of the requirements for family hous-
ing, these authorizations have been left
virtually intact. In approving this
authorization, we have not been un-
ndful of the military housin 1-
VindiMititothe
cers quarters, constant:44 Otit
c p
bill Vo ovi e $1
thbtYlbig V krantge m
nun ttee ?
Senate. That
0,002,000 in au-
tgares on hous-
Inguif0at4nillfttitri3flSflnei. This au-
teboritricetlltlinbezilladiloSIM. the next 3
Y %And') itpit 0114paglistould
,000 units. It is reported that
Med from th,
e unable tp,
?
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
Ft? 1.1 of tir.4s deconnot by CIA LIS
? t'--t
tioro to dPclasS
Ym--y ,en oi
st remain
En 70.2
!i iia,e;ting, 0 CA,
?
rt Cf
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
siet*se
831
Approved For Relea.41sirOt#08Thit. g-CRACRE19804111?11R000500060021 -8
urn ira.s made with ref- tioln South Dakota Mr_ CAstl. for the following enrolled bilis, and they vvert-
the benencial service record
5 very excellent work they have done on signed by tile Acting Peer *dent pro tem-
1,:reor?L r- Vinzant, The Seria.tor from the bill which the Senate has just passed. pore:
Mi,:irsaititi ;has .uiready,t. alluded to our. There are few measures which are more S. 727 An act to adjust the '
ti should to ;ssociate myself tedious and which require more exact-
ci r'emak5 alSod We believe,
ne.L the clerk o strhe, onitrirttee, have
roe hat the sace William Dar-
duet/Ie. , He has ,becn.
mdc-
o in his elittrOil, to ftirther 1,11e
y. oil.. of the euri411,4e, ge, as always
hold a i;olace ot,Tritorglatioo,?to us and
as :tie zrys been ready to SUp,Bly it. Re
aldvav5 on cat) whewyer we wanted
? ,
to ask tor infuxfpatione, ife,, ,,has cer-
ilminty done a goi?Od' jobs and, I should
Iii,ref,,re like thq tilCCORp? tg 114 aP-
pre*etalirni of his _good -
MI STENINTIS'il,r I trhaiOF tlia Senator
(ruin South th.lropt. ? `Me PrOViSions in
the bill reflect 04 ipart hia ,very fine
knowledge of the SubJectmMatter. There
is no way to calcialate or estimate the
t xtent of the valuable ,servieeS of the
Senator from Sbuth Dakota_ not only
t In, year, but also, in the previous years
when he acted aanchairman ,of the sub- Mr. JOHNSON of Texas Mr, Pres-
committee- Ile ?4as , carried a heavy
hiad. and he has ,iertctiri4 Made a line ident, I move that the Senate proceed
i contribution. to the consideration of Order No., 697.
m Senate plesoitition 120.
, I should like to? point to a proviso in
: the bill which 114 not been MelitiOned. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-
pore., The clerk will state the re4oIu-
It Rud.:'` tion by title for the information of the
. P :.t Idea far?ther, That at such time as
;
1 to( c--;*.tral Inrelhonce *agency occupies the Senate,
1,c, ((quarters erstai*tion authorized by this The LEGISLATIVE CLERK. A resolution
,t title the Acithltrktrator of General Services (S. Res. 120) providing for the manner
Is 4 tithOr2'.'f4 and directed Lo aCCotuplish the,. .0_,!. the APPothtill_erit.of the Select Corn-
Cit ir/'1 " lull Atitt ..r#411gr et pf0tternpornry Guy. Mittee on Small Business.
; err-rale:1r 0 44124,fg ,cc
mg work than does one of these com-
prehensive military construction au-
thorization bills. The subcommittee has
rendered a real service to the Senate and
to the country by the very careful at-
tention they have given to this measure.
Mr. President, I move that the Senate
insist upon its amendment, request a
Conference with the Rouse of Repre-
sentatives thereon, and that the Chair
appoint conferees on the part of the
Senate
The motion was agreed to; and the
Acting President pro tempore appointed
Mr. STENNIS, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. BYRD, Mr.
CASE of South Dakota, and Mr. SALTON-
sfru.i. conferees on the part of the Senate.
?
APPOIN'TMeal 1' OF SELECT COMMIT-
TEE ON SMALL BUSINESS
..,
?
('it) lb
i r e ; ii?t4 listil,,q;,;ig?,,,
011
*A,....
1 If tirli Pr6-4:-'11tf
f terid to th,fr ,, +9 .fl .
I t'tf the t ?40i),
* arid 011 '1 riTil
'1 DOW ne6lt" P r ,.
Fr-
,,
; ArrencY., 11,
wit disP,is
? PrOtriit 0,tri.,
ttle,,-aistrict The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tern-
at t9,4,441o., pore. The question is on agreeing to yamm
H. R. 1525. An act for the fe'fiei Arae,,
judges the mumetpal coot I appeal,. 1,?
the District of Columbia. the salaries of t'ir
judges of the munietpal cowl for the Dis
trict of Columbia, the StfalitTy 01 the Jude:-
of the District of ColuinkM! t ax ootr:.
the salary of the judge of the inveithe Cr,' ii
of the District of Columbia.,
H. R. 989. An act for the nitef of Dr Loots
J. sebine;
R 960. An act for the ellen ot raintko
Rlit Reich;
H.R. 1111. An act for the relief ,r1
Mack:
H. R. 1163. An act for react n Le,
noun and Lily Hu Lee Holm;
H. H. 1247. An act for the relief of Carol
Brandon (Valtrude Prubt):
H. R. 1'255, An act for the relief of Ferenc
Babothy:
H. R. 1281 An act for the relief ot Carlo
IT R.1283. An act for the relief of Olga
Joannou GeOriculea;
H. R. 1287. An act for the reiter of David
Eforrika, 13orenstajn, Itta Doren-stain 111,f.
Schipper, and Fella riorensta to Reicroingcr;
H. R. 1157, An act for the relief ot Chin
York Gay:
11. H. 1417, An act for the relief of Charles
(Carlos) Gerlicz;
Butch,
If.1467. An act for the relief of iititepo
H. R. 1472. An act for the H:lbei of
manuel Soares De Mendonca.
H. H. 1473. An act for the relief of Eleanore
Hauser;
H. R. 1474. An act for the relief of Ross
Sherman Trigg,
If, H. 1475. An act for the ,.ellef of Wine
Chong Chan:
ce-t4e.?,r4tOiOret4e #t;f1a,V.,4101,4maggifi. 1Alhacete , gA1,111147711,Aft_acx,..,tar--the relief of T (-!,
otiort-Was agreed " ; iiirdathe Elliott;
.,-4 CIL resolution is. _Res. 120) was considered if. H. 2933. An act for the relief at sirs
,
?apart,. arid agreed to, asfollows: Berta 1Vienserith*
_ie r Aelailit ..4aescaeed, Tha4 the chairmen and mem_ H. R. 3069. An act for the relief ol' Co. are- lora of the Seise% Committee on small flue- .
fronio D. Espina;
Intgiligerice- ttlass. t,reated by, Senate Resolution 58, 81st H. R.3070. An act for the relief of Mrs
? ? with._ congrelsa, iid 44044014,_ shalt apwinted, _Lee Tat Hung Cluan and Quail ::ltng.
ttige thp. ti.1, the.; b8Dle .111414 110-11,4a tha?esme it R.3075. An for the ;chef ot
rteni, -Wen knovvn as J '
An act., for the t ettel 01 Ji u1
,Q1/t t e (7,11.'1'111,r:4 32.7i. "'' '?
fl -Laoyd Smelcer
;, *,.1- 4tithe41,05,entce hg at each Cr4grea? ?
President, ?
of a qt10F ttt. -
's.
se
e AI No .404-Lem- - MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSEthseairxuedaieriary.4n4d, jrenpra3toe,dat5.tgtif:,Li,;.;sfotro$raktiho
5502. An act making appropriations
, yustice-
Fr9 _
0 454itive Ir-1)13tretIded, to ca11 A message from the House of _Repre- _purposes; and
roll. ITAthaePta4Velti. reading_ 16761:154.4rner.a_Miikalgrpti_itii,wprit,,,,,,.7,,
oar fOr, e quirt ,matlioinded o con erence ,tn the disagreeing votes ?
r. JG? ?SON ? presi_.? clerk. annound that the House had year u e 30. 1956 turd for ?tiler
1.1.ael
rifIr4r ?4,4,44 the agreed to the_ire"Port of the committee
The A04,Thici:
. ' - of the two Hottses on the ainellitiMents _
TI're MicAiori iftetirn, -' . e.- ma,k111.# _a ) roReticitf(tils?..f0f the Depart- .. The-Secretary of the Senate report 'd
("0111i/ill tee a?mendMax3 a., Amended, "'"rrillts ()ir SCate and .-r-314?tleS3lie JildiC1- that on today. July 1, 1955, ite prese,oi,,,i
The ahle"dille141 a....4,141F1A13404. was '.8. afid reratel 'agencies f9r..the mItseal to the President of the United Stater in,
"P'reed . I p 3 0 ' OH' 1 r g 0, , i g 444: e#444 i/itiler,30,e-190164ngfpx,p_?-thPr . enrolled bill (5. 727.) to adjust th ? i.
/lir, a r...rtm,..., two; , -0 tern- pilivose;; that the House receded from
?TMIt1"'"" '5'''F--"1-# . 149 -its disagreement to the amendments of
pan . The-que -non is OD the engross- the Senate numbered 2, 12 13, 27, 35,
n,rnt, of the anienciMelit and the third
I 0.:,,dlly,t Of ti14, hi 1,141,4, t 1? 37. and 46 to tli,e bill, and concurred
1 therein, and trial the House receded
The 3 Merldfilt ht 4,4tere4,tia be en- from its disagreement, to the amend-
'''. '181'ed and the in to.)e,-,,ratol a third xnents of the Senate numbered 30 and
111e II ,'[ lff ,' f 49 to the bill, and concurred therein,
"Ilit. bill (H R 029) was read the each with an amendment, in which it.
third time and 1),1,-,4ed. 1 II requested the concurrence of the Senate
Mt RUSSELL Mi. President. I wish - DEPAR,TIYIENTS OF STATE AND
dorf, Without otrj tag rA *tiered of the Senate 'to- tire R 02) , _ OLLED 13ILL PRE.,-...ENT EL
- irk
ries of judges of the municipal court ot
appeals for the District of Columbia.
the salaries of the judges of the mu-
nicipal court for the District of Colum-
bia. the salary of the judge of the tits-.
trict of Columbia tax court, and 11?.
salary of the judge of the ju court
of the District of Columbia,
at the. . ti to express my deep spine-
.
cation to the Senator frombalSaLSSInni ENROLLED Brtr-5 SIGNED TICE, AND JUDICIARY APPROPR IA -
TIONS--CONFElat,MB ktERORT
Mi STENtritsk .the_Betialorinfr.pai
Int: ton iM"Pfikkis.stMUkkor ftfi eggPs42PenttK aseirhis signature to the mit a report of the committee of con- l
) sookuRDR80,01 3E0 Rftfelift0.0W441-41...
Approved For Repase'2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-0V70R000500060021-88713
1955 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD?SENATE
school system, will do much to save our t
youth.
Then, thirdly, religion. The church and
hat if something of file utmost importance,
omething involving the very life and death
of our country had to be accomplished, then
he question of financial cost was not to be
considered at all. Thus, when it was de-
cided to create an atomic bomb?even
though no one was certain that it could be
achieved?we did not hesitate to spend what
was then, and still is, the astronomical sum
of $2 billion. We said then, and we say now,
that whatever the cost, it was worth it.
Something of the same spirit animated the
National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis
when it embarked upon its dramatic pro-
gram to stamp out this horrible disease.
Untold millions of dollars were spent and will
continue to be spent until this scourge is
completely eliminated from the world. Who
will say that its wasn't?and isn't?worth it?
Some such crash program, it seems to me,
is required if we are to win the war against
juvenile delinquency, a disease which is even
mode dreadful and more destructive than
polio or any other physical ailment. Let us
have more family counselors than we think
we need. Let us build more and better
schools and playgrounds than we think are
necessary. Let us hire better teachers, more
teachers and provide them with a wage to
which they are entitled. Let us engage more
youth directors than we believe we are going
to need. The cost will go up into the hun-
dreds of millions and billions of dollars, but
who will say that it isn't worth it?
At the present time juvenile delinquency is
problem number one in America. It is in-
finitely more serious than any other prob-
lem which we are confronted. The very
existence of our civilization depends upon its
solution. It must be solved and it can be
solved and it will be solved, when the citizens
of our Nation become aware of the respon-
sibilities devolving upon them. Yes, punish-
ment is necessary when crimes are commit-
ted, whether by juveniles or by adults. But
that doesn't solve the problem. It is the
delinquent society which creates delinquency
that requires our attention.
In the 21st chapter of the Book of Deuter-
onomy a very strange procedure is described
in connection with what is to take place
when a slain person is found in a field and
his murderer is unknown. The elders and
the judges of the city nearest the spot where
the body has been found are required
to offer a sacrifice, wash their hands over
it and then say, "Our hands have not shed
this blood, neither have our eyes seen it.
Forgive, 0 Lord Thy people Israel, whom
Thou had redeemed, and suffer not innocent
blood to remain in the midst of Thy people
Israel." In commenting on this unusual
proceeding, one of the ancient rabbis asked:
"Why is it that the good people, the re-
spectable people, the elders and the judges
are called upon to swear that their hands
were guiltless of this crime? Why were not
the cutthroats, the thieves, and the known
criminals of the community made to swear
that they did not perpetrate this crime?" To
these rhetorical questions he provided the
answer: "In order that we might always real-
ize that not the bad people, but the good
people are responsible for the evils of a
community: the evils of life will disappear
when the good folk assume the responsibili-
ties which belong to them." Amen.
the synagogue?when correctly understood t
and used by the parents?can and do play
a major role in the prevention of delin-
quency. The house of God and the religious
school must, however, not be regarded by
parents as good places to which to send
their children, but in which they have no
personal interest. How naive can parents be-
come when they say: "I sent them to church,
didn't I? I sent them to Sunday school,
didn't I? What kind of a church are you
running? You must have a pretty bad Sun-
day school if my children are turning out
this way."
Now, religious institutions, although they
can be exceedingly effective and are effective
in the training of character, cannot perform
miracles. Such institutions can imbue the
child with the highest concepts of morality
and unselfishness only when his parents par-
ticipate with him. Only then will the child
consider these institutions important.
Fourthly, the influence of the community
Upon the child's growth and development.
Good housing, it has been shown time and
again, prevents delinquency. And rec-
reational facilities, playgrounds and social
centers, operated by trained personnel, are
all unquestioned deterrents to delinquency.
The work of youth organizations like the
Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, YMCA's, YWCA's,
etc., all should be widely expanded
so that more and more of our youth will
come under their influence. The policy of
' the infiltration of street gangs by trained
youth leaders that is being pursued by our
own New York Youth Board is, to my mind,
an excellent method of dealing with this
problem. Yes, when the community influ-
ences are favorable, the child has a better
chance to be the kind of citizen that his
parents and that the community at large
would want him to be.
Finally, it is Well known that the moral
climate of a community has its effect upon
the youth. Stories of corruption involving
important Government officials, shady busi-
ness practices, stories of easy money and of
gangsters who are glorified and become he-
roes, the effebt of unwholesome movies, comic
books, TV programs are not without their
Influence upon the young. Dr. Fine tells
of a young thief who remarked to him:
"Yes, I stole $150 from 'a gas station. So
what? How much did Governor Hoffman
steal from the people of New Jersey?" It is
this attitude that is very easily developed
in the minds of impressionable youth. "If
they can do it, if they can get away with it,
Why can't I?"
I shall not go into the improvements that
must be made in the various agencies deal-
ing with our youth after they have become
delinquent?the juvenile police officers, the
juvenile courts, improved foster homes, de-
tention homes, training schools, etc.?but
desire merely to emphasize the need for im-
proving those media which will prevent juve-
nile delinquency, namely, the home, the
school, the church and synagogue, the com-
munity, the morale climate. To achieve
this purpose, we Must stop thinking in terms
of delinquent youth, but rather in terms of
our delinquent society. We know the causes.
We also know the cure. Our problem is not
that we demand that something be done
by someone else, but that We express our
willingness to accept whatever responsibility
devolves upon us as members of society and
to make whatever financial sacrifices that
may be necessary in order to build a finer,
healthier, and more Worthy community life
-for the young people of our country. No
task confronting us is more important, none
more essential to the well-being of our so-
ciety.
During the war a new expression, crash
program, came into frequent use. It means
Losing Trade in Latin America,' It goes
on to state that Japan and Europe, in-
cluding the Soviet bloc countries, are
cutting into the trade of Latin America
by offering lower prices and longer credit
terms.
This assertation was contained in a
United Nation's report which reviewed
the economy of the Latin America coun-
tries for the year 1954.
Mr. President, the Department of
Commerce reveals that our trade with
Latin America has dropped by almost
$250 million in the past 2 years, and
there is every indication that with our
little attention to the affairs of the
countries to the south of us, and in-
creased attention on the part of the
countries of Europe and the Soviet bloc
countries that trade between Latin
America and the United States will un-
fortunately continue to fall off.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous con-
sent to have printed in the RECORD at
this point the above-described article.
There being no objection, the article
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,-
as follows:
UNITED STATES IS LOSING TRADE IN LATIN
AMERICA
LOSS OF UNITED STATES TRADE IN
LATIN AMERICA
Mr. SMATHERS. Mr. President, to
those of us whb recognize the impor-
tance of .the Latin Americtureountries to
the economic well-being of our Nation,
the article whiai appeavad in the July
1 issue of thb- 'VV.hington Post and
Times Herald is Indeed frightening.
This article Pee/Aided 'ItTnited States Is
tfr -
UNITED NATIONS, N. Y., June 30.?Japan
and Europe, including Soviet bloc countries,
are cutting Into United States trade with
Latin America by offering cheaper prices and
easier credit terms, a U. N. report disclosed
today. Soviet bloc trading was sharply on
the upgrade, it said.
A review of Latin American economies for
1954 was made public here in advance of
the meeting of the U. N. Economic Commis-
sion for Latin America starting August 29 in
Bogota, Colombia.
Agriculture increases in Latin America as a
whole kept up with a population increase
and industry spurted 8.4 percent over 1953,
but there were gloomy notes in the review.
Investment in Latin America showed a de-
clining trend. Balance of payments surplus,.
was reduced by more than $700 million.
During 1951 and 1953 imports of European
rolling stock almost equaled those from the
United States, the review noted. The United
States also was losing ground in commercial
vehicles, not only to Europe but also to
Japan.
European exports to Latin America of
machinery for the pulp, paper, and timber
industries have more than doubled in 2 years,
while those of the United States and Canada
have fallen by 45 percent, the review said.
Japan was described as extremely active
in textile-machinery sales.
Eastern Europe and Japan have provided
strong competition in agricultural ma-
chinery, cutting considerably imports of
United States tractors.
The United States still holds an edge in
the sale of private automobiles and was
showing recovery in agricultural machinery,
oil drilling machinery and machine tools, the
review said.
MULTIPLE USE OF SURFACE OF
SAME TRACTS OF PUBLIC LANDS?
CONFERENCE REPORT
Mr. ANDERSON. Mr. President, I
submit a report of the committee on con-
ference on the disagreeing votes of the
two Houses on the amendments of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 5891) to amend
the act of July 31, 1947 (61 Stat. 681)
and the mining laws to provide for mul-
tiple use of the surface of the same
tracts of the public lands, and for other
Approved For Releale*2000/0,?411.; GIA-RDP80-01370R0
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-0137^00500060021-8
8714 -CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENA fE
purposes. I ask unanimous consent for
the present consideration of the report.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.
BARKLEY in the chair). The report will
be read for the information of the
Senate.
The legislative clerk read the report,
as follows:
The committee of conference on the dis-
agreeing votes of the two Houses on the
amendments of the Senate to the bill (IL R.
5891) to amend the act of July 31, 1947 (61
Stat. 681) and the 'mining laws to provide
for multiple use of the surface of the same
tracts of the public lands, and for other pur-
poses, having met, after full and free con-
ference, have agreed to recommend and do
recommend to their respective Houses as
follows:
That the House recede from its disagree-
ment to the amendment of the Senate and
agree to the same with a further amendment
as follows: On page 5, line 17, of the Senate
engrossed amendment, after the words
"United States" insert the words "subse-
quent to the location of the claim", and the
Senate agree to the same.
CLINTON P. ANDERSON,
HENRY M. JACKSON,
JOSEPH C. OWAHONEY,
EUGENE D. Mizasktn,
ARTHUR V. WATKINS,
Managers on the Part of the Senate.
CLAIR ENGLE,
WALTER ROGERS
LEE IvIrrcAL.r,
JOHN P. SAYLOR,
WILLIAM A. DAWSON,
Managers on the Part of the House.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there
objection to the present consideration of
the report?
There being no objection, the Senate
proceeded to consider the report.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
question is on agreeing to the conference
report.
/The report was agreed to.
J,
CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN MILI-
TARY, NAVAL, AND AIR FORCE
INSTALLATIONS - CONFERENCE
REPORT
Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, I sub-
mit a report of the committee of con-
ference on the disagreeing votes of the
two Houses on the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 6829) ,to au-
thorize certain construction at military,
naval, and Air Force installations, and
for other purposes. _I ask unanimous
consent for the present consideration of
the report.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The re-
port will be read for the information of
the Senate.
The legislative clerk read the report.
(For conference report, see House pro-
ceedings of July 7, 9.
.6,
The subcommittee did not know of the
objection of the people of Langley, Va.,
to the possible location of the new CIA
headquarters in that community.
I am not sure whether it has been
finally decided that the headquarters
will go to Langley, Va,. I think, how-
ever, that certainly the people of that
coniMunity should have an opportunity
to be heard before the Appropriations
Cominittee before any final decision is
reached. The committee was unaware
of the protest at the time the matter
was being considered.
There being no objection, the letter
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
JULY 8, 1955.
The Honorable HENRY M. JACKSON,
Senate Office Building,
Washington, D. C.
DEAR SENATOR JACKSON: We are residents
and property owners of the Langley-Great
Falls area of Fairfax County, Va., who are
concerned over the possible construction of
the Central Intelligence Agency headquar-
ters in the neighborhood. - On April 7 of
this year CIA announced publicly that it
was giving up any.plan to locate in Langley.
Then last week, without notice, language was
written into a military construction bill
which indicated that CIA was still very much
interested in Langley as a possible site. We
believe there are serious considerations
against locating CIA in Langley that should
be brought to the attention of the Congress.
Langley is a unique residential area of one-
family homes on large lots, country places,
and farms. There are no apartment build-
ings ahd virtually no commercial develop-
ment. A large Government office building
will bring great pressure for mass housing,
commercial construction, used-car lots, and
other changes which will destroy the char-
acter of the area.
Fairfax County is already hard-pressed to
provide water, sewerage, schools, roads,
police, and other facilities for a rapidly grow-
ing population. Water and sewerage may be
esranged for an office building itself, but the
great population increase which will follow
will throw an intolerable burden on the
community. For example, the water table
is already falling in the county, and new
mass housing in an area of individual wells
will lower the table disastrously and dry up
many existing wells.
To erect a large office building on this
river front property and to build a super
highway to it in the name of the George
Washington Memorial Parkway is directly
contrary to the purposes of the Capper-
Crampton Act. The Congress in 1930 author-
ized. the acquisition of the river front prop-
erty, including, the entire Virginia shore of
the Potomac from below Chain Bridge to a
point above Great Falls, for a memorial
to George Washington and for "the protec-
tion and preservation of the natural scenery
of the Gorge and the Great Falls of the
Potomac" (46 Stat. 482). a
The public Roads tract at Langley with
11/2 miles of riverfront is the only substan-
tial piece of United States property on the a
July 11
Virginia shore above Chain Bridge available
for park purposes. Other such property is
increasingly difficult to acquire. As with the
more highly publicized Maryland shore of .
the Potomac, the interest of protecting the
wilderness of the river and carrying out the
statutory purposes of the Capper-Crampton
Act must be balanced against the interest of
providing access for the motorist. Neither
consideration, however, suggests that large
Government office buildings should be lo-
cated on potential park land.
The McLean Citizens Association, drawing
Its members from the entire. area, consid-
ered the problem at a special meeting and
voted to opppose location of a CIA building
in Langley. At a subsequent meeting the
association recommended that park and rec-
reation areas be designated for the area, in-
cluding if possible the bulk of the Public
Roads property at Langley. Of several sites
now being considered by CIA, Langley is the
only one in which the local citizens associa-
tion has objected. In fact, other areas have
pleaded with CIA to locate there and have of-
fered free land and facilities.
No affirmative reason has been offered for
location of a huge Government office build-
ing on potential park land, in the midst of
an entirely residential area, against the
wishes of the community and in the face of
Strongly pressed invitations to locate else-
where. CIA has no need to have its employ-
ees walk in rural residential surroundings.
To locate in Langley would damage a unique
community with no offsetting gain to CIA.
We are presenting our views in this letter
to make clear that residents of the Langley
area have not changed their opposition to a
CIA building here. After the April 7 state-
ment we assumed that the mattter was
closed. If Langley is again to be consid-
ered by CIA, we wish to be heard. Surely
such a controversial proposal, with its serious
effects on long-established Federal park pol-
icy and on the orderly development of a
community, should receive full and careful
studydncluding an opportunity for all view-
points to be presented.
Respectfully yours,
BENJAMIN LEE BIRD.
G. BOWDOLN CRAIGHILL, Jr.
ROGER FISHER.
MANNING _GASCH.
ANTHONY Lgwis.
SAMUEL E. HEEL.
CYNTHIA ZLMMERMAN.
Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, I have
a short statement which is a sumary
of the conference report, and I ask unan-
imous consent that the statement may be
printed in the RECORD at this point in my
remarks.
There being no objection, the state-
ment was ordered to be printed in the
RECORD, as follows:
STATEMENT BY SENATOR STENNIS ON CONFER-
ENCE REPORT ON H. R. 6829, MILITARY CON-
STRUCTION AUTHORIZATION BILL.
A tabulation showing a comparison of the
uthorization contained in this bill as it
passed the House, as it passed the Senate,
nd as has been agreed to in conference is
s follows:
N RESSIONAL ECORD.)
The P S I 0 CER. Is there Comparative summary of military construction authorization bill (II. I? 6829)
objection to the present consideration of
the report?
? There being no objection, the Senate
proceeded to consider the report.
Mr: JACKSON. Mr. President, I ask
unanimous consent to have printed at
this point in the RECORD a letter which
I received from residents of Langley, Va.
House
Senate
Conferemo
Army
-
Nay
$551,
105, 000
596, 140,000
$527,
027, 000
$533,
904,
000
n
1,
165, 453, 000
1,
671,
205,
620, 300
170, 000
1,
564,
207,
224,
902,
000
300airnrIPP:ieW
CIA
300,
000
-Mit IMINallrelffitpliOrp--0-
86,000,
000
53,
100,000
54,
500,
000
Total
0'
ait illi
$ 11
usiwitimr
2,
368, 996,
900
2,
357,
317, 300
2,
360,
530,
300
Mos Pm Pe maim
110 41.011160104 *win* ti
Approved For Release 2000/08/16,?CIA-RDP8 00500060021-8
inissole erwiss. fp* SIN
Wq 01.0016411 int J. Ampex
eremoo*
1J155 Approved For Rele6yRdiggyMet:RHBugo
The total authorization agreed to in con-
ference is $3,213,000 more than had _been ap-
proved by the Senate and $8,468,600 less than
had been approved by the House.
Under the conference agreement the Army
would receive $533,904,000 or $6,877,000 more
than had been contained in the bill as it
passed the Senate. This difference repre-
sents, Senate agreement to add $5 million
for hospital facilities at Fort Jackson, S. C.
and to add $1,877,000 for cold storage facili-
ties at Schofield Barracks in Hawaii.
The Mavy would receive authorization In
the amount of $564,224,300, which figure is
$7,396,000 less than the Senate had ap-
proved. This net reduction derives from the
Senate's agreeing to the addition of $31,000
for pr9viding Navy family quarters in the
District of Columbia and to the addition of
$432,000 for a dispensary at Quantico, Va.,
with these additions being more than offset
by reductions of $6,098,000 at Camp Pendle-
ton' in California; $123,000 at the Naval
Powder Factory, Indian Head, Md.; and $1,-
683,000 for land acquisition at Port Chicago,
Calif. The decision to reduce the authoriza-
tion at Camp Pendleton results from a re-
luctance to provide additional facilities there
until an adequate water supply for the base
is assured. The land acquisition at Port
Chicago was deleted, pending an on-the-site
study by a subcommittee of the House
Armed Services Committee to determine
whether this land requirement can be co-
ordinatd with a similar requirement of the
Army in the same area. The relatively
small reduction at the Naval Powder Factory,
Indian Head, Md. was made after the De-
partment of the Navy advised that it no
longer required this small item.
The Air Force portion of the authorization
is $1,207,902,000, an increase of $2,732,000
over the authorization contained in the bill
as it passed the Senate. The addition of
$2,732,000 is to provide additional facilities
at the Charleston Air Force Base, S. C.
These facilities were originally scheduled
for authorization next year, but were in-
cluded in this bill in order to enhance the
effectiveness of this important base at an
early date.
The Senate had provided authorization for
the headquarters installation for the Cen-
tral Intelligence Agency in a maximum
amount of $53,500,000; $45 million of this
sum as intended for the construction of
buildings. If the headquarters installation
were placed at Langley, Va., $8,500,000 would
have been available for the extension of the
George Washington Memorial Parkway. If
a site other than Langley were chosen, $1
million would have been available for the
purchase of the necessary land. The House
had provided $50 million for the building,
and the Conferres agreed to add $1 million
to the Senate allowance of $45 million for
this purpose. Thus, the CIA is provided a
maximum authorization of $54,500,000, of
which $46 million is earmarked for the con-
struction of a headquarters installation. If
the Langley site is finally selected, an addi-
tional $5,500,000 is available for extension
of the George Washington Memorial Park-
way. If the Langley site is not selected, this
$8,500,000 is not available for authorization,
but $1 million would be available for the
? purchase of land.
The' House had provided an authorization
of $300,000 for the construction of quarters
and related communication facilities for the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his
'assistants. The conferees recognized the de-
sirability of providing suitable quarters for
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, but no
detailed justification for this construction
had been ppresented in the Benate, and it
was agreed that an authorization of this type
should be separately considered. Only this
Morning a subcommittee of the Senate Com-
mittee on Armed Services took testimony on
an alathorization for this purpose, and it is
possible that a separate bill to authorize
housing for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff will be reported in time for consid-
eration and action at this session of the
Congress.
There were two changes from the Senate
version of the general provisions contairibd
in title V. The Senate conferees agreed to
accept a House provision authorizing the
secretaries of the military departments to
acquire housing units insured by the Fed-
eral Housing Commissioner pursuant to title
VI or title IX of the National Housing Act
in those cases where the housing units are
adequate and suitable for housing military
personnel and their dependents. This pro-
vision, as it was originally inserted by the
House, was intended to be complementary to
a somewhat similar provision authorizing
the secretaries of the military departments
to assume, on application by the sponsor,
mortgage obligations on the so-called Wherry
housing units that had been insured under
the provisions of title VIII of the National
Housing Act. The Senate bill did not con-
tain the provision affecting the Wherry hous-
ing units. The House receded from its lan-
guage authorizing the acquisition of Wherry
housing units and the Senate accepted the
House language authorizing the acquisition
of title VI and title IX units.
The second change in the general provi-
sions as they had passed the Senate relates
to the provision requiring the secretaries of
the military departments to come into
agreement with the Armed Services Commit-
tees on the utilization of certain classified
and overseas construction authorization.
This section represented a continuation of
committee policy adopted originally in 1952.
However, the construction requirements, cost
estimates, and base agreements are much
more firm and definite today than was true
in 1952, and the Senate agreed to eliminate
this provision.
Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, the
conference report substantially follows
the bill as passed by the Senate.
With reference to the matter at Lang-
ley, Va., we did not locate the CIA build-
ing at Langley. There was no testimony
taken on that point.
I ask unanimous consent that a letter
from the county executive of the county
of Fairfax, Va., be printed in the RECORD
at this point.
There being no objection, the letter
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
Fairfax, Va., July 7, 1955.
Hon. JOHN C. STENNIS,
United States Senator,
? Senate Office Building,
Washington, D. C.
DEAR SENATOR STENNIS: It occurs to me that
it would be appropriate to advise you of the
position taken by the Board of County Super-
visors of Fairfax County, Va., relative to
possible location of the Central Intelligence
Agency's Office building near Langley in Fair-
fax County.
Our board has consistently welcomed the
CIA to this location and has expressed a
willingness to cooperate in every way pos-
sible in providing the facilties which this in-
stallation would require in order to make it
possible for the Langley site to be chosen.
The board has officially agreed to provide
sewage disposal for the installation and has
cooperated with the city of Falls Church
and the Virginia Department of Highways
relative to supplying water and providing
adequate highway facilities for same.
It is my understanding that a decision in
connection with this location will soon be
forthcoming and I am pleased to advise you
000500060021-8
8715
of the position taken by the Fairfax County
Board of County Supervisors.
With best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
CARLTON C. MASSEY,
County Executive.
Mr. THURMOND. Mr. President, I
should like to congratulate the members
of the conference committee upon the
action on the bill which the distin-
guished seniof Senator from Mississippi
has presented. The able and distin-
guished Senator from Mississippi and his
committee composed of the Senator from
South Dakota [Mr. CASE], the Senator
from Washington [Mr. JACKSON], and
the Senator from Massachusetts [Mr.
SALTowsrALL], performed a very fine
service, and I wish to commend them
for the excellent manner in which they
handled the bill.
On behalf of the people of South Caro-
lina I should like to say that we are
very appreciative of the consideration
given to the hospital at Fort Jackson.
Fort Jackson is one of the finest instal-
lations for training troops, and the hos-
pital will provide facilities which are
very badly needed there. We are very
grateful to the conference committee for
their action in the matter.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
question is on agreeing to the conference
report.
The report was agreed to.
Mr. JOHNSTON of South Carolina
subsequently said:
Mr. President, I should like to com-
mend the three Senate conferees on the
military construction bill for their suc-
cess in retaining certain items in the bill.
I wish to say something in behalf of the
Charleston transportation depot; and I
notice that there is $5 million allowed
for Camp Jackson, S. C., for medical fa-
cilities. I should like to invite the atten-
tion of the Senate to the fact that it is
not Camp Jackson. It is Fort Jack-
son. It was made a fort several years
ago.
Also, I notice that $427,000 has been
Included for the naval industrial reserve
shipyard, Charleston, S. C.; $1,650,000
for the Marine Corps record depot, Par-
ris Island, S. C.; $4,649,000 for the Ma-
rine Corps auxiliary air station, Beau-
fort, S. Q.; and $553,000 for community
facilities at the Naval Receiving Station,
Charleston, S. C.
There are several other items pertain-
ing to South Carolina, but I shall not go
into them in detail now.
I thank the committee of conference
for having included these items for
South Carolina. I think they are much
needed and can well be used in the de-
fense of our Nation at this time.
MRS. LORENZA O'MALLEY (DE
AMUSATEGUI) ET AL.
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate a message from the
House of Representatives announcing its
disagreement to the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 1003) for the
relief of Mrs. Lorenzo, O'Malley (de
Amusategui), Jose Maria de Amusategui
O'Malley, and the legal guardian of Ra-
mon de Amusategui O'Malley and re-
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
8716
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 :_c_JAzialIQP80,_01 R000500060021-8july
CONGRESSIONAL KLWItl)
questing a conference with the Senate on
the disagreeing votes of the two Houses
thereon.
Mr. KILGORE. I move that the Sen-
ate insist upon its amendment, agree to
the request of the House for a con-
ference, and that the Chair appoint the
conferees on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; and the
Presiding Officer appointed Mr. KILGORE,
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. WELKER,
and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the part of
the Senate.
THOMAS F. HARNEY
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before
the Senate a message from the House of
Representatives announcing its disagree-
ment to the amendment of the SenEtte
to the bill (H. R. 2907) for the relief of
Thomas F. Harney, Jr., doing business
as the Harney Engineering Co., and re-
questing a conference with the Senate
on the disagreeing votes of the two
Houses thereon.
KILGORE. I move that the Sen-
ate insist upon its amendment, agree to
? the request of the House for a conference,
and that the Chair appoint the conferees
on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; arid the
Presiding Officer appointed Mr. KILGORE,
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. Weimm,
and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the part of
the Senate.
ORRIN J. BISHOP
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate a inessage fitiln the
House of Representatives announcing its
disagreement to the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 4249) for the
relief of Orrin J. Bishop and requesting
a conference with the Senate on the dis-
agreeing votes of the two Houses there-
on.
Mr. KILGORE. I Move that the Sen-
ate insist upon its amendment, agree to
the requestbf the House for a conference,
and that the Chair appoint the con-
ferees on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; and the
Presiding Officer appointed Mr. Knoorts,
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. WEL-
KER, and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the
part of the Senate.
DONALD HECTOR TAYLOR
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill
(S. 26) for the relief of Donald Hec-
tor Taylor, which was, in line 7, after
"fee" insert "Provided, That a suitable
and proper bond or undertaking, ap-
proved by the Attorney General, be de-
posited Eta prescribed by section 213 of the
said act."
Mr. KILGORE. The bill has been
amended 'by the House to provide for the
posting of a bond, as a guaranty that the
beneficiary will not become a public
charge. ,
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
ESTATE OF VICTOR HELFENBEIN
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before
the Senate a message from the House of
Representatives announding its dis-
agreement to the amendment of the Sen-
ate to the bill (H. R. 5078) for the relief
of the estate of Victor Helfenbein, and
requesting a conference with the Senate
on the disagreeing votes of the two
Houses thereon.
Mr. KILGORE. I move that the Sen-
ate insist upon its amendment, agree to
the request of the House for a conference,
and that the Chair appoint the con-
ferees on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; and the
Presiding Officer appointed Mr. KILGORE,
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. WELKER,
and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the part of
the Senate.
LUPE M. GONZALEZ
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
36) for the relief of Lupe M. Gonzalez,
which was, to strike out all after the en-
acting clause and insert:
That the Attorney General is authorized
and directed to discontinue any deportation
proceeding and to cancel any outstanding or-
der and warrant of deportation, any war-
rant of arrest and bond which may have
been issued in the case of Lupe M. Gozalez,
and the said Lupe M. Gonzalez shall not
again be subject to deportation by reason
of the sane facts upon which any such de-
portation proceedings were commenced or
any such warrants of arrest have issued.
Mr. ItELGORE. The amendment of
the House is to merely cancel outstand-
ing deportation proceedings rather than
granting the status of permanent resi-
dence to the beneficiary.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
Mr. KaLC+ORE. The bill has been
amended by the House to delete the
name of one of the beneficiaries inas-
much as he has departed from the United
States.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
ANNA C. GIESE
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
24) for the relief of Anna C. Giese,
which was in line 7, after "fee" insert
"under such conditions and controls
which the Attorney General, after con-
sultation with the Surgeon General of
the U t
ned States Public Health Service,
Departl ent of Health, Education, and
Welfare, may deem necessary to im-
pose." ,
Mr. KILGORE. The House amend-
ment provides that the Surgeon General
may inipose such conditions as he may
deem necessary, inasmuch as the bene-
ficiary has been afflicted with tuber-
culosis.
.I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The Motion was agreed to.
MARION S. QUIRK
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
758) for the relief of Marion S. Quirk,
which was, on page 1, line 7, after "fee"
insert ", under such conditions and con-
trols which the Attorney General, after
consultation with the Surgeon General
of the United States Public Health Serv-
ice, Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare, may deem necessary to
impose."
Mr. KILGORE. The bill has been
amended by the House to provide that
the Surgeon General may impose such
conditions as he may deem necessary,
inasmuch as the beneficiary has been
afflicted with tuberculosis.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
RELIt4, OF CERTAIN ALIEN SHEEP-
HERDERS
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
633) for the relief of certain alien sheep-
herders, which was, on page 1, line 5,
strike out "Panagiatis Demitreos Zeras,".
ELISEU JOAQTJIM BOA
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
1654) for the relief of Eliseu Joaquim
Boa, which was, to strike out all after
the enacting clause and insert:
That, notwithstanding the provisions of
section 212 (a) (9) and (19) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act, Bliseu Joaqgim
Boa may be admitted to the United States
for permanent residence if he is found to be
otherwise admissible under the provisions
of that act: Provided, That these exemptions
shall apply only to grounds for exclusion of
which the Department of State or the De-
partment of Justice had knowledge prior to
the enactment of this act.
Mr. KILGORE. The bill has been
amended by the House to grant a waiver
to the beneficiary of the bill, rather than
granting the status of permanent resi-
dence. This waiver will enable the bene-
ficiary to qualify for a visa as the hus-
band of a lawfully resident alien.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
DR. LUCIANO A. LEGIARDI-LAURA
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
467) for the relief of Dr. Luciano A.
Legiardi-Laura, which was, to strike out
all after the enacting clause and insert:
That, for the purposes of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, Dr. Luciano A. Legi-
ardi-Laura shall be held and considered to
have been lawfully admitted to the United
States for permanent residence as of the date
of the enactment of this act, upon payment
of the required visa fee. Upon the granting
of permanent residence to such alien as pro-
vided for in this act, the Secretary of State
shall instruct the proper quota-control offi-
cer to deduct one number from the appro-
Approved For Release 2000/98/16 : CIA7RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
779M92.0.069)00vP -july 1 1
Bridge ,available
TE
.or park purposes.? Other such property is
increasingly diffieUlt to acquire. ,Arkwith the
more highly publiebted*Varyltfridshore of
the Potonatie,'the.itnteritaTgifproteating the
wilderness Of the:irlyer:andsearrying'but the
statutory purposes of Ih'e'Capper-Crampton
Act must be balaneekagainst the interest of
providing access for the motorist. Neither
consideration, howeVer.Wgest.6 that 'large
10-
eGaovernmn
Government office land.id it?.6
ted o
The McLean Citizens Association, drawing
Its members from the entire ?rerit'- Consid-
ered the problem at a speelal1104 ing and
voted to opppose location dila, f1I*AliUtlding
In Langley. At a subsequent LZAtteling the
association recommended thit'13,fid rec-
reation areas be designated,for4ei ria',7 in-
cluding if possible the bulk of the Public
? nRoowadsbepinrospeeorntysidaetrLaednbgylezI.4:of,ur-41iitat
only one in which the local.citiEena,aasocia-
Von has objected. In fact, other arena have
pleaded with CIA to locate there and:have of-
fered free land and facilities. ,
No affirmative reason has been offered for
location of a huge Government office build-
.ing on potential park land, in the midst of
an entirely residential area, against the
wishes of the community and in the face of
strongly pressed invitations to locate else-
where. CIA has no need to have its employ-
ees work in rural residential surroundings.
" To locate in Langley would damage a unique
community with no offsetting gain to CIA.
We are presenting our views in this letter
to make clear that residents of the Langley
area have not changed their opposition to a
CIA building here. After the April 7 state-
ment we assumed that the mattter WAS
closed. If Langley is again to be consid-
ered by CM, we wish to be heard. Surely
such a controversial proposal, with its serious
effects on long-established Federal park pol-
icy and on the orderly development of a
community, should receive full and careful
study including an opportunity for all view-
points to be presented.
Respectfully yours.
BENJAMIN LEE BIRD.
G. BOWDOIN CItAIGHILL,Jr
Roam FISHER.
MANNING GASCIL
ANTHONY LEWIS.
SAMUEL E. NEEL.
CYNTHIA ZIMMERMAN.
Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, I have I
a short statement which is a summary
of the conference report, and I ask unan-
imous consent that the statement may be
printed in the RECORD at this point in my
remarks. .
There being no objection, the State-
ment was ordered to be printed 1k the
RECORD, as follows:
STATEMENT BY SENATOR STENNIS ON,CONFER-
ENCS REPORT ON H. R.. 6829. MILITARY CON..
,satiocriost Avrtionizarion Mt!,
A tabulation showing a comparison of the.'
authorization contained in this bill , as it
passed the House, as It passed the Senate,,
and as has been agreed to in conference is
as follows:
_ ..,:$3714. CONLIISIQ L ? SENA
Approved For Rele C
ase zuuu/uoPtg ? Rk$IWP80-1:013
, purp0,49? I ask unanimous cons r for The subcommittee did not know of
411e, present consideration of the irt. objection of the people of Langley, Va..,
' ,, PRESIDING OFFICER, .Mr. to the possible location of the new CIA
in the chair). The report will headquarters in that community.
' :Or the informatioh Of,r.th6' I am not 'Sure whether it has been
finally decided: that the . headquarters
isliiyoe , clerk read will go, te'PlinleY, Va. I think, how-
ever, thak, certainly the people of that
. ,
, community should have an opportunity ?
orinnittee of CI5nterente On the dis-
eeing votes of , the two Houies on the to be heard before the Appropriations
n&Inenta of the Senate to the bill (H. R, Committee : before any final decision is
amend the act of July 31, 1947 (el reached. -' The committee was unaware
091 L' and the mining laws to provide of the protest at the time the matter
Woe' use of the sinlate of the same was being considered." *
ttliOniblic lands and for other pur7 ' . There being no objection, the letter
ifiVing tnet, after full4ancl free con- was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
t hive' , agreed to reannmend and do - follows:
.-
reeo end -t.ci their respective Houses as JULY 8, 1955.
liows4' , .. ',,., ' . ., . The Honorable HENRY M. JACKSON, , ,
at Ole 2:10USe recede from its disagree- Senate Office Building,
the liniendment of the Senate and Washington, V. C.
the same with a further amendment
fellows' DEAR. SENATOR JACKSON: We are residents
On page 5, line 17. of the Senate
, and property owners of the Langley-Great
engrossed amendment, after the words Falls area of Fairfax County, Va., who are
"United States" insert the words "subse- concerned over the possible construction of
queni to the location of the claim", and the the Central Intelligence Agency headquar-
Semite agree to the same. tees in the neighborhood. On April 7 of
CLINTON Y. ANDL'RSON, L year CIA announced publicly that it
HENRY M. JACKSON, IUS was giving up any plan to locate in Langley.
Joszen C. O'MAIIONLY, Then last week, without notice, language was
EUGENE D. Muzricist, ?
written into a military construction bill
ARTHUR V. WATKINS, which indicated that CIA was still very much
Managers on the Part of the Senate. interested in Langley as a possible site. We
believe there are serious considerations
against locating CIA in Langley that should
be brought to the attention of the Congress.
Langley is a unique residential area of one-
family homes on large lots, country places,
and farms. There are no apartment build-
ings and virtually no commercial develop-
ment. A large Government office building
will bring great pressure for mass housing,
commercial construction, used-car lots, and
other changes which will destroy the char-
acter of the area.
Fairfax County Is already hard-pressed to
provide water, sewerage, schools, roads.
police, and other facilities for a rapidly grow-
ing population. Water and sewerage may be.
arranged for an office building itself, but the
great population increase which will follow
will throw an intolerable burden on the
community. For example, the water table
Is already falling in the county, and new
mass housing In an area of individual wells
will lower the table disastrously and dry up
many existing wells.
To erect a large office building on this
river front property and to build a super
highway to it in the name of the George
Washington Memorial Parkway is directly
contrary to the purposes of the Capper-
Crampton Act. The Congress in 1930 author-
ized the acquisition of the river front prop-
erty, including the entire Virginia shore of
the Potomac from below Chain Bridge to a
point above Great Falls, for a memorial
to George Washington and for "the protec-
tion and preservation of the natural scenery
of the Gorge and the Great Falls of the
Potomac" (46 Stat. 482).
The Public Roads tract at Langley with
11/2 miles of rlverfront is the only substan-
tial piece of United States property on the
(hLAIR BUGLE.
WALTER ROGERS
LITE METCALF,
JOHN P. SAYLOR,
WILLIAM A. DAWSON.
Managers on the Part of the House.
? The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there
objection to the present consideration of
the report?
There being no objection, the Senate
proceeded to consider the report.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
question is on agreeing to the conference
report. -
The report was agreed to.--
' CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN MILI-
TARY. NAVAL, AND AIR FORCE
? INSTALLATIONS ? CONFERENCE
REPORT
? Mr. ST-ENNIS. Mr. President, I sub-
mit a report of the committee of con-
ference on the disagreeing votes of the
two Houses on the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 6829) to au-
thorize certain construction at military,
naval, ahd Air Force installations, and
for other .purposes, I 'ask unanimous
consent for the present consideration of
the report. *
? The PRESIDiNG OFFICER. The re-
port will be read for the' information of
the Senate.
The legislative clerk read the report.
For conference report, see House pro-
ceedings of July 7, 1955, pp. 8661-8669.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.)
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there
objection to the present consideration of
the report?
There being no objection, the Senate
proceeded to consider the report.
Mr. JACKSON. Mr. President, I ask
unanimous consent to have printed at
this point in the RECORD a letter which
I received from residents of Langley, Va.
Comparative summary of military construction authorization bill (II. R. 0829)
lloilm
. Senate
Conference'
Army
Navy
Air Yore" .
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff.1
CIA
Total
Oil-
'1;3"
? mutaaloon
,, , 140, WO
11010C1033
I I
, go, ''II
I, 4t.t.v ' ?--
? , ,211
IV,411.1.1* I
1 sa, we, e00
Alli '',. ?( 904,00a
.z ''t 224 Soo
I. 20'4902,0mi
64, ma ow
u ___
14:4.445
xxiliti:i
ep221/iS,
10151814
" :,800
,iSt 111124 la
"Ki--187, 7,300
8111
2,360,530, Xiit
o ii touispo ptpu.waflou 04 ow
Nt.....kiv pug ua *Mown; is 4014192e
qstoLuittat-wsi
gement 01 op qoctuuou4 pA enr pre
Docnotiout
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
Document Do.
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80110111POROOOttY0V6V621-8
deter:T:1in tte
IMptclext to tlootato
it cora et DIA
TS S itinte'd q754
C
14'1'04 '
mttbing f CAintones
Li
Approved For ReleaSe 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8
1955 Approved For ReldasCgif66/014:4561PIN3P8OF#114,0R000500060021-8
'rhe total authorization agreed to In con-
ference is $3.213.000 more than had been ap-
proved by the Senate and $8,468,600 less than
had been approved by the House.
Under the conference agreement the Army
would receive $533,904,000 or $6,877,000 more
than had been contained In the bill as it
passed the Senate. This difference repre-
sents Senate agreement to add $5 million
for hospital facilities at Fort Jackson. S. C.
and to add $1,877,000 for cold storage facili-
ties at. Schofield Barracks in Hawaii.
The Navy would receive authorization in
the amount of $564,224,300, which figure Is
$7,396,000 less than the Senate had ap-
proved. This net reduction derives from the
Senate's agreeing to the addition of $81.000
for providing Navy family quarters in the
District of Columbia and to the addition of
$432,060 for a dispensary at Quantico, Va.,
with these additions being more than offset
by reductions of $6,008.000 at Camp Pendle-
tm in California: $1.23,000 at the Naval
Powtier Factory, Indian Head. Md.; and $1,-
C83.020 for land acquisition at Port Chicago.
Calif. The decision to reduce the authoriza-
tion, at Camp Pendleton results from a re-
luctance to provide additional facilities there
until an adequate water supply for the base
hi assured. Tlie land acquisition at Port
Chicago was deleted, pending an on-the-site
study by a subcommittee of the House
Armed Services Committee to determine
whether this land requirement can be co-
ordInatd with a similar reqUirement of the
Army in the same area. The relatively
small reduction at the Naval Powder Factory,
InaLiu Head. Md was made after the De-
partment of the Navy advised that it no
longer required this small item.
"I he Air Force portion of the authorization
is $1,207,9020'0, an increase of $2,732,000
over the authorization contained in the bill
as it passed the Senate. The addition of
#2,732,600 is to provide additional facilities
at the Charleston Air Force Base. S. C.
1 hese facilities were originally scheduled
tor authorization next year, but were in-
cluded in this bill in order to enhance the
effectiveness of this important base at an
early date,
The Senate had provided authorization for
the headquarters installation for the Cen-
tral Intelligence Agency in a maximum
ainount of $53,500.000; $45 million of this
sum as intended for the construction of
buildings. If the headquarters installation
were placed at Langley, Va., $8,500,000 would
have been available for the extension of the
George Washington Memorial Parkway. If
a site other than Langley were chosen. $1
million would have been available for the
purchase of the necessary land. The House
had provided $50 million for the building,
and the Conferres agreed to add $1 million
' to the Senate allowance of $45 million for
this purpose. Thus, the CIA is provided a
maximum authorization of $54,500,000, of
which $46 million is earmarked for the con-
struction of a headquarters installation. If
the Langley site is finally selected, an adc11,-
tional $8,500,000 is available for extension
? of the George Washington Memorial Park-
way. If the Langley site is not selected, this
$8.500.000 is not available for authorization,
but al million would be available for the
purchase of land.
The flouse had provided an authorization
of $300,000 for the construction of quarters
and related communication facilities for the
Chairtnan of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his
assistants. The conferees recognized the de-
:Arability of providing suitable quarters for
the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, but no
(let:Wed Justification for this construction
had been ',presented in the Senate. and it
was agreed that eh authorization of this type
should be separately considered. Only this
morning a subcommittee of the Senate COM.*
ttee on Armed Services took testimony on
an authorization for this purpose, and it is
possible that a separate bill to authorize
housing for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff will be reported in time for consid-
eration and action at this session of the
Congress.
There were two changes from, the Senate
version of the general provisions contained
in title V. The Senate conferees agreed to
accept a House provision authorizing the
secretaries of the military departments to
acquire housing units insured by the Fed-
eral Housing Commissioner pursuant to title
VI or title IX of the National Housing Act,
in those cases where the housing units are
adequate and suitable for housing military
personnel and their dependents. This pro-
vision, as it was originally inserted by the
House, was intended to be complementary to
a somewhat similar provision authorizing
the secretaries of the military departments
to assume, on application by the sponsor,
mortgage obligations on the so-called Wherry
housing units that had been insured under
the provisions of title VIII of the National
Housing Act, The Senate bill did not con-
tain the provision affecting the Wherry hous-
ing units. The House receded from its lan-
guage authorizing the acquisition of Wherry
housing units and the Senate accepted the
House language authorizing the acquisition
of title VI and title IX units.
The second change in the general provi-
sions as they had passed the Senate relates
to the provision requiring the secretaries of
the military departments to come into
'agreement with the Armed Services Commit-
tees on the utilization of certain classified
and overseas construction authorization.
This section represented a continuation of
committee policy adopted originally in 1952.
However, the construction requirements, cost
estimates, and base agreements are much
more firm and definite today than was true
in 1962. and the Senate agreed to eliminate
this provision.
Mr. STENNL9. Mr. President, the
conference report substantially follows
the bill as passed by the Senate.
With reference to the matter at Lang-
ley, Va., we did not locate the CIA build-
ing at Langley. There was no testimony
taken on that point.
I ask unanimous consent that a letter
from the county executive of the county
of Fairfax, Va., be printed in the RECORD
at this point.
There being no objection, the letter
as ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
follows:
COMMONWEALTH Or VIRGIN/A,
COUNTY Or FAIRFAX,
Fairfax, Va., July 7, 1955.
on. JOHN C. Brzrmrs,
United States Senator,
Senate Office Building,
Washington, D.C.
DEAR SENATOR STENNIS: It Occurs to me that
t would be appropriate to advise you of the
ition taken by the Board of County Super-
sors of Fairfax County, Va., relative to
ible location of the Central Intelligence
ency's Office building near Langley in Fair.
ax County.
Our board has consistently welcomed the
CIA to this location and has expressed a
willingness to cooperate in every way pos-
sible in providing the facilties which this in-
stallation would require in order to make it
possible for the Langley site to be chosen.
The board has officially agreed to provide
sewage disposal for the installation and has
cooperated with the city of Falls Church
and the Virginia Department of Highways
elative to supplying water and providing
equate highway facilities for same.
It is my understanding that a decision in
onnection with this location will soon be
forthcoming and I am pleased to advise you
8715
of the position taken by the Fairfax County
Board of County Supervisors.
With best wishes.
Sincerely yours.
CARLTON C. MAMMY,
County Executive.
Mr. THURMOND. Mr. President, I
should like to congratulate the members
of the conference committee upon the
action on the bill which the distin-
guished senior Senator from Mississippi
has presented. The able and distin-
guished Senator from Mississippi and his
committee composed of the Senator from
South Dakota [Mr. Cssz], the Senator
from Washington [Mr. JacicsoN], and
the Senator from Massachusetts [Mr.
SALTON5TALL1, performed a very fine
service, and I wish to commend them
for the excellent manner in which they
handled the bill.
On behalf of the people of South Caro-
lina I should like to say that we are
very appreciative of the consideration
given to the hospital at Fort Jackson.
Fort Jackson is one of the finest instal-
lations for training troops, and the hos-
pital will provide facilities which are
very badly needed there. We are very
grateful to the conference committee for
their action in the matter.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
question is on agreeing to the conference
report.
The report was agreed to.
Mr. JOHNSTON of South Carolina
subsequently said:
. Mr. President, I should like to com-
mend the three Senate conferees on the
military construction bill for their suc-
cess in retaining certain items in the bill.
I wish to say something in behalf of the
Charleston transportation depot; and I
notice that there is $5 Million allowed
for Camp Jackson, S. C., for medical fa-
cilities. I should like to invite the atten-
tion of the Senate to the fact that it is
not Camp Jackson. It is Fort Jack-
son. It was made a fort several years
ago.
Also, I notice that $427,000 has been
included for the naval industrial reserve
shipyard, Charleston, S. C.; $1,650,000
for the Marine Corps record depot, Par-
ris Island, S. C.; $4,649,000 for the Ma-
rine Corps auxiliary air station, Beau-
fort, S. C.; and $553,000 for community
facilities at the Naval Receiving Station,
Charleston, S. C.
There are several other items pertain-
ing to South Carolina, but I shall not go
into them in detail now.
I thank the committee of conference
for having included these items for
South Carolina. I think they are.much
needed and can well be used in the de-
fense of our Nation at this time.
MRS. LORENZA O'MALLEY (am
AMUSATEGUI) ET AL.
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid ,be-
fore the Senate a message from the
House of Representatives announcing its
disagreement to the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 1003) for the
relief of Mrs. Lorenra O'Malley (de
Amusategui), Jose Maria de Amusategui
O'Malley, and the legal guardian of Ra-
mon de Amusategui O'Malley, and 're-
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP80-01370R000500060021-8