POSSIBLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN CIA CAREER SERVICE PLAN AND STATUTORY RIGHTS OF VETERANS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80-01826R000700110003-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: November 11, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 9, 1998
• Sequence Number: 3
• Publication Date: September 6, 1955
• Content Type: MFR

Approved For lease 1999/0
RDPQ1
6 Septem er 1955
SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts Between CIA Career Service Plan and
Statutory Rights of Veterans
1. As a result of a telephone conversation between ;fro
of Personnel and Mr. Irons of the Civil Service Commission, a meeting
25X1A9a
was held in the office of John W. Steele
i
i
ildi
tt
d
d b
C
B
Room 171B, Civil Service
f
omm
ss
on
ng, a
u
en
e
y Mr,
Personnel and
o
25X1A9a
Mro , of the office of the General Counsel, from
25X1A9a
1130 to 1230 hours, 2 September 1955 (Mr. Steele may be reached on
Code 1719, Extension 5291),
2, The issue for discussion was as follows:
Under policy to be embodied in a revision of R 20.105,, CIA
would not credit military service toward the three year eligibility
period for the Career Staff except in those cases where the service
was undertaken at the request of CIA or in the performance of CIA
functions; would this violate any statutory rights. of veterans?
30 At the outset, we indicated to Mr. Steele that,, although we
could find nothing in the applicable legislation or CSC Regulations
directly in point, since the issue of possible conflict had been
raised internally, we wished to secure his advice as the Vetera.-a'
Preference expert of the Civil Service Commission, We explained to
him generally the concept of the CIA Career Service and told him
that the general philosophy behind such a program had been informally
approved in earlier discussions with the Commission,
4o Mr, Steele agreed that there was nothing in the statutes or
regulations directly bearing on the case, However, he felt that this
was because of the necessary broadness of statutory language and
because in devising regulations, the Commission had not considered
this type of situation, He pointed out that should a case arise
under our Career Service program and be brought to the Commission for
determination of the applicability of Veterans' Preference legislation,
the Commission would have to look to the intent of the statute, which
he felt sure was to prevent the veteran from losing any rights to
which he would otherwise have become entitled,, as a result of his
military service,
DOCNT NO.
NO CHANGE NN CLASS.
E-1 DECLASSIFIED
CLASS. CHANGED M TS S
NEXT REVIEW DATEa
AUTNi HR 70.2
DATEr 1 R11vM fWeQWftr Release
 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-R
1.r+
0-01826
54 Mr. Steele pointed out that it was most unlikely that a case
arising within CIA mould get to the Commission for determination,
1ovever, we emphasized that we wished to accord with the law and the
proprieties, whether or not the degree of our conformance was ever
open to question,
6, Some discussion ensued on the nature of the benefits that
would attach to membership in the Career Service, Mr, Steele
specifically askt if preference would be given to Career Employees
in any reduction in force. We replied that.. although no overall
RI plan had as yet been developed for the Agency, it was likely
that retention preference would be granted to members of the Career
Staff, Ve emphasized the obligation undertaken by those who applied
for an accepted membership in the Career Staff-the obligation of
unlimited mobility, We stressed the greater value, considering the
functions of this Agency, of a mobile employee, other things being
equal,
7, We then raised the key point that concerned us, that is,v the
extreme case of an individual whoa after a few days of civilian
service with CIA, might enter the military anda, upon restoration
to CIA civilian employment, would become immediately eligible for
consideration for the Career Staff, We pointed out that the various
criteria for meership were such that it would be almost impossible
to determine their applicability in such a case, since no one within
CIA would have had a fair opportunity to appraise the individual,
8o Mr Steelees conclusion was that although we must count
all military service for eligibility, since eligibility is based
solely upon length of service, and this is the very interest of the
veteran most specifically protected, there could be no objection to
our determining in individual cases that an eligible individual did
not yet meet the requirements of the selection criteriaQ
94 The overall conclusion of the oonference was that the most
satisfactory phrasing for CIA Regulation would be one counting all
military service in determining eligibility so as to avoid a possible
conflict0 It was also agreed that it would be violatory of the
spirit of the law, if not of its letter, to blanket out by adminis.
trative action all those who offered military service as part of
their three year eligibility period, although it is recognized that
there may be a higher percentage of rejects in this group simply
because of the difficulty of determining their suitability under
established criteria,
Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP80-01826R000700110003-4
 Approved For Re 1999/09/08 :
1O, The point was made to Mro Steele that CIA was not sure
whether or not it was subject to Veterans' Preference legislations
and Mr. SSteele conditioned his conclusions uptnn the assumption
that we were,,, or that (as we had stated) we wished to comply with
the policy of the legislation whether subject to it or noto
ls'
25X1A9a
/5/
25X1A9a
Approved For Release 1999
-RDP80= 926R000700
003-4
CO PY
a v r .~
01 0