ADMINISTRATIVE AUDIT DIFFERENCE STATEMENT REFLECTING DISALLOWANCE OF $3.40 FROM TRAVEL CLAIM

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80R01731R000400130002-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 21, 2016
• Document Release Date: January 16, 2009
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: June 9, 1954
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2009/01/16: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000400130002-6
25X1 MENIORANDUIu1 T :
eci Assistant to the Director
25X1
25X1
9 June 19S7a.
EJECT: Administrative Audit Difference Statement
Reflecting Disallowance of 6-3.40 from
Travel Claim Covering Period 1 - 7 May 1954
4. In the case of your claim, air travel was utilized as the basis
for constructive 'cost determination for comparative purposes, since that
method of transportation resulted in the greater constructive cost and
such mode of travel could have been properly utilized by you. The time
of departure from Headquarters and New York selected for constructive
cost purposes were such as to assure arrival in New York by the time
of actual arrival and to have permitted departure at actual time of
departure.
n
M e Comptroller General
1. Your question to Colonel White regarding the propriety of the
subject disallowance has been referred to me for review.
2. A review of travel order number which constitutes
authority for reimbursement for the TDY trip to New York City and return,
reveals that allowance for use of privately owned automobile was limited
to "seven cents per mile, not to exceed cost by common carrier', (under-
scoring supplied). 3. In any case wherein a traveler is authorized to utilize a
privately owned automobile on a mileage basis subject to the limitation
that the cost shall not exceed the cost by common carrier, it is neces-
sary that the claim as submitted by the traveler be compared with the
constructive cost by common carrier, including the constructive cost
of per diem by that mode of transportation. The allowable reimburse-
ment in such case may not exceed the constructive cost by common
carrier. This comparison and basis of reimbursement has been affirmed
by decisio
f th
in order that your account may be cleared.-v The Administrative Au t
Difference Statement is attached.
5. In view of the above, it would appear that the disallowance
made in your claim was in order and required by the terms of your travel
order. Annnrt - ,1,r -- a
'ef, Finance Division
Approved For Release 2009/01/16: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000400130002-6
 Approved For Release 2009/01/16 CIA-RDP80R01731 R000400130002-6
ai;utui r
T LASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL
NW,
(SENDER WILL CIRCLE CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM)
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
25X1
I
INITALS
DATE
sistant tothe Direr
pecial
FS
or
L Building
4
5
FROM
ITIALS
DATE
i
Finance Division
June 54
2
3
I ~ APPROVAL II INFORMATION SIGNATURE
I I ACTION I DIRECT REPLY I RETURN
COMMENT PREPARATION OF REPLY I I DISPATCH
I J CONCURRENCE C~ RECOMMENDATION FILE
Remarks :
ECR T CONFIDENTIAL UNCLASSIFIED
^
^ _4 Previous editions maybe used. (40)
r. evcce 18-98548-7
Approved For Release 2009/01/1F7CIA-RDP80R01731R000400130002-6
 Approved For Release 2009/01/16: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000400130002-6
to ,
the
i. 4 a lwY 1.SY i ~.?" '' the f i c')lti
rod,; . S gSA~Z-cI'L i on ;q y s t+. x ici
ift`a' iJl t"" `e '. bt~' deductte E s"?'