LETTER TO COLONEL EDWARD G. LANSDALE FROM FRANK G. WISNER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80R01731R000300170007-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 25, 2003
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 9, 1958
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80R01731R000300170007-8.pdf218.17 KB
Body: 
1'3) , Approved For Release 2003/05/05: CIA-RDP80R01731R00900170007 Colonel :cAlward G. 1 sdal USA II Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Special Operations) Dear Ed: \C) DI ALITR-i.. HA 70-2 DATE: I2/ REVIEINE: My note on Cold War Intelligence, dated 9 June 1958, crossed your memorandum on DOD Cold V, ar Intelligence Requirements - For a Contested Free World Country of the same date. Yoi may recall that my note pointed out that I was not certain that a greater magnitude of collection or major changes in collation of intel- ligence information were necessary. Your draft, however, very effec- tively points up the kinds of questions that collated intelligence should answer for the purpose you have in mind. It may also possibly bring out some gaps in our collection guidance. Dick 1{elrre and I have both gone over your memorandum. In addition, I have had some of our more knowledgeable operations people interested in tl,is subject study the paper. I am giving you here a consolidation of all these views. We consider the draft an excellent and comprehensive compilation of the kinds of intelligence needed for the development and guidance of programs for forestalling and countering Communist efforts to take over free areas. In fact, one might call your draft the EFI for a. commander ,n the cold war. One of our elements is using some of your ideas in a study on a related subject. I note that though your draft is deocr bed as covering DOD require- ments, it actually goes across the board and includes sociological. political, and economic factors as well as those of a more strictly military character. I think it is a good idea to gather all these facets into a single package to insure balance and coordination. I assume, (F.XErEilf Approved For Release 2003/05/05 : CIA-RDP80R01731R000300170007-8 25 Approved For Release 2003/05105: CIA-RDP80R01731R000300170007-8 however, that you envisage that the various elements of the Government would take action within the scope of their respective charters. You will recall that in an earlier conference we agreed that there were numerous activities that could be tarried out appropriately without re- vising the present distribution of darter functions among Government agencies. I was particularly impressed with the emphasis you have given to looking forward so that cold war operations can concentrate on preventive action. As you well know, the 13.5. so often finds itself countering Com- munist activities as contrasted to precluding or frustrating them. The forward look is particularly appropriate in the subjects of paragraphs I a, 2, 4 and 10. It seems to me that in a redraft of the paper you might wish to spell this aspect out more specifically in respect to the subjects of paragraph 5 and 9 also. In addition, you might wish to make more specific mention of a need for information on trends in the political moti- vation and awareness of the people as a whole and of the ethnic and other groups making up the nation. As I mentioned in my earlier note, much of the information to ful- fill such requirements is already being collected. It is collated in a. wide variety of doctur.ents each as the NIS and other regional and country studies prepared in, or for, various government departments and agencies. The hand books being prepared by WRAF for the Army, certain Navy reports, U. S. L A. Country Papers, and some et our own documents come to rnind. What you have done, as I see it, is to propose analysis and collation of this material specifically for cold war operations purposes in respect to parti- cular countries. In the process, you have expressed in a new way, some requirements for information and a number of objectives against which to interpret and collate that information. I suppose the next step will he to have your requirements reviewed in the light of the intelligence guides now in the hands of collectors, so that indicated additions or changes may be made. After that, or perhaps simultaneously, I imagine the guides for such documents as the NIS would be reviewed against your proposals to see what modifications might be needed. V'e have been faced with a parallel problem. We realize that we are only one of the users of the NIS, so we have not pressed for adapting it to our particular needs. Accordingly, we prepare special analyses as required 2 Approved For Release 2003/05/05 : CIA-RDP80R01731R000300170007-8 Approved For Release 2003/05/05 : CIA-RDP80R01731R000300170007-8 and have established small elements to make collations of intelligence materials for some particular planning awl operational needs. We are always faced with a decision as to how far this refinement can and should go. We do not want our operators to be intelligence analysts. On the other hand, we do not like to have them spoon-fed to too great a degree. I think they need to study some original intelligence material to maintain a thorough understanding of the area. Furthermore. they need to study such material because the intelligence people are not always the best judges of what the operators need and intelligence processing of the material introduces an additional time delay. I am sure you will have to meet this issue in your situation in Defense. We have written this memorandum as a device for getting our thoughts in order. We are now ready to sit down with you and discuss ways and means of making this effort bear fruit. Sincerely, Frank G. Wisner Approved For Release 2003/05/053: CIA-RDP80R01731R000300170007-8