NPIC DATA SYSTEM DATA AND CONTROL SEGMENT ACQUISITION PHASE APPENDIX B4 RFP COMPLIANCE MATRIX

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 63
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 18, 2007
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: February 24, 1982
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9 _ _
UNCLASSIFIED
NPIC DATA SYSTEM
DATA AND CONTROL SEGMENT
ACQUISITION PHASE
APPENDIX B4
RFP COMPLIANCE MATRIX
STAT
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSi FI ED
NPIC DATA SYSTEM
DATA AND CONTROL SEGMENT
ACQUISITION PHASE
APPENDIX B4
RFP COMPLIANCE MATRIX
STAT
This data, furnished in connection with Request for Proposal 82-B-015 as amended, shall not be dis-
closed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for
any purpose other than to evaluate the proposal. If a contract is awarded to this offeror as a result of
or in connection with the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate,
use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the contract. This restriction does not limit the
Government's right to use information contained in the data if it is obtained from another source
without restriction.
STAT
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
We have fully complied with the D/C Segment Acquisition Phase RFP. This
appendix is provided to assist the Government in determining evaluating
this proposal in accordance with the RFP requirements.
A compliance Matrix for Proposal Volumes II through V is included. The
Matrix lists proposal preparation instructions and evaluator criteria, and
identifies the proposal sections and appendices that address that requirement.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSI FI ED
?
Section: 2. Requirements Analysis
Proposal Preparation Instructions
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The approach to and the results of a formal require- 2.1, 2.1.3
ments analysis effort must be presented.
The methodologies and tools used must be discussed. 2.1.1, 2.1.2
The contractor must demonstrate a solid understanding 2.1.3
of the BOC, IOC, and FOC requirements.
The contractor should identify significant missing or 2.2
incomplete requirements or critical TBRs/TBDs that re-
quire immediate resolution.
'The key performance and functional requirements must be 2.1.4
identified, discussed and related to architecture and
design consideration.
The contractor must discuss significant requirements is- 2.2
sues including significant TBRs/TBDs which may impact
cost, schedule or performance.
The contractor is encouraged to suggest changes to any 2.2
requirements or effectivities that would lead to a
significant improvement in program schedule or cost.
The contractor must clearly and comprehensively state 2.3
all requirements related assumptions which have impacted
the architecture, design or transition and discuss the
significant effects of those assumptions.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
?
Section: 20.1.1.1 Requirements Analysis (Section 2)
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
20.1.1.1 Requirements Analysis
The extent to which the contractor displays a clear un-
der standing of the D/C segment and NDP system
requirements.
The extent to which the contractor has displayed a ra-
tional, clear, and comprehensive analysis of the
requirements.
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
2.1.3, 2.1.4
The extent to which the contractor has clearly identi- 2.1.4
fied and justified the segment driving functional and
performance requirements.
The extent to which the contractor has identified
missing or incomplete requirements, requirements or
their effectivities which should be modified for the
good of the program or critical TBRs/TBDs which must be
resolved early.
The completeness and adequacy of the traceability of re- 2.1.2,
quirements. Appendix A3
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The contractor must present a clear and comprehensive 3.1
understanding of the sponsor's environment and tasking, 3.1.1
particularly the external interfaces, timeliness and 3.1.7
workload.
The proposal must clearly describe concepts for exploi- 3.1.1
tation which will be responsive to this tasking.
Topical reporting, 3.1.4
search, 3.1.5
softcopy support, 3.1.3
collateral support and 3.1.6
other major functional exploitation concerns should be 3.1.6
addressed.
The role of the D/C segment in the support of these con- 3.1.2
cepts must be clearly presented.
The contractor must demonstrate a clear understanding 3.1.2
also of the roles and scope of the E/R, C/I and 3.2
C/S segments.
The contractor must clearly present his concepts and his 3.2
preferred approach to the intersegment interfaces and
relate these to the System concept, other segment roles, 3.2
intersegment compatibility and the D/C segment role as
the user interface.
Command and control concepts, standard query language 3.2
approaches, security and intersegment protocols, as a
minimum, must be discussed.
?
The contractor must clearly and comprehensively design 3.3
the Integrated Work station role and functional concepts
for support of the exploitation process.
Emphasis should be placed on human engineering, produc- 3.1.7
tivity and intersegment considerations. 3.2, 3.3
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The adequacy of the contractor's understanding of the 3.1, 3.1.1
problem to be solved, understanding of the external inter- 3.1.2
face and
timeliness and concepts for the exploitation process.
3.1.3 - 3.1.6
The clarity and adequacy of the contractor's concept of 3.1.7
the D/C segment's role in the exploitation process and
the degree to which these concepts, enhance Imagery
Analyst productivity.
The adequacy and reasonableness of the contractor's 3.2
intersegment interface concepts particularly in the 3.3
area of communications, work station processes and in-
teractions, data base query, data base synchronization,
reports generation and command and control.
The realism and cost effectiveness of the concepts 3.1.7
for staffing to support D/C operation.
?
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
?
Proposal Preparation Instructions
A. Analysis
The contractor must discuss the architecture selection
process
specifically addressing the role of key requirements,
alternative architecture considered, and
the analytical process used to focus to the desired
architecture and
the criteria that were used in that process.
The contractor must describe the recommended
architecture and
present a clear and comprehensive justification
for its selection.
Trade studies and analysis must be presented. Evolu-
tionary growth concepts and plans must be discussed.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
4.1.1
4.1.2, 4.1.3
4.1.4, 4.1.5
4.1
4.2.1, 4.2.2
4.1, 4.2.1,
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.1.4
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.1, 4.2.2
4.2.3, 4.2.1
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The extent to which the contractor demonstrated a 4.1
comprehensive and convincing analysis leading to 4.2.1
the recommended architecture. 4.2.2
Emphasis will be placed on the appropriateness of the 4.2.1
trades, analyses and extent of the justification for 4.2.2
the final selection.
The extent to which the architecture is responsive to 4.2.3
the segment requirements
with emphasis on ease of transistion reliability, 4.2.1
maintainability and availability consideration. 4.2.2, 4.2.3
The extent of the evolutionary growth potential for 4.2.3
the chosen architecture.
The degree and type of flexibility offered by the 4.2.3
recommended architecture.
The effectiveness with which the architecture satisfied 4.2.3
the inter-segment interface concepts.
UiVCLASSiFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The contractor must discuss the key segment requirements S.1
and assumptions which have shaped the recommended design.
Rationale and justification for selection as driving 5.1
requirements must be presented.
Proposal Preparation Instructions
A. Driving Requirements
B. Design
The contractor must describe the rationale and justify 5.2.1
the requirements allocations by functional requirements
groupings.
The resulting design shall be presented in overviews at 5.2
the segment level and expanded to more detail in the
discussion below.
The contractor must show that all functional require- 5.2.1%
ments will be met with this design.
BOC,
5.2':
IOC and 5 2%~
FOC design must be clear. 5,2~;
Performance budget allocations must be discussed. 5.2.1
The extent to which proven technology concepts have been 5.2.2
used in the design must be addressed.
Unique design features which minimize the impact of 5.2.2
hardware failure,
facilitate testing,
increase productivity, 5.2.2
facilitate software maintenance, 5,2,2
reduce. risk, 5.2 2
minimize cost, etc., should be discussed. 5,2,2
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The contractor must present the BOC, 5.3.1
Proposal Preparation Instructions
C. Hardware
FOC hardware configuration in additional detail 5.3.1
with appropriate justification.
Top level Configuration Item (CI) performance 5.3.2
specifications must be presented.
RMA impacts on the hardware design must be made clear. 5.3.1
The contractor must present the BOC, IOC, and FOC 5.4*
software configuration in additional detail with
appropriate identification of and justification for all 5.4.1
Computer Program Conficuration Items (CPCI) and
adequate rationale for the placement of CPCIs within 5.4.2
CIs.
The selection of the development language(s) to be 5.4.3
used must be justified.
Software sizing (LOC) data by CPCI and project phase must 5.4.1
be supplied.
The extent of retained baseline software must be 5.4.1
made clear.
The contractor must clearly present the data base design 5.5
and
must discuss data requirements and relationships, major 5.5.1
files, file structure, file sizing and
the data base management capabilities required to 5.5
meet the D/C requirements.
Data Base Management System (DBMS) selection criteria 5.5.3
and justification of the preferred DBMS must be
presented.
Data integrity issues, 5.5
query capabilities, and 5.5.3
archival consideration must be discussed. 5.5
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSi FI ED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The contractor must discuss the staffing requirements 5.6
imposed by the design and
must clearly present the philosophy, rationale and 5.6
capabilities provided for segment operation.
Position descriptions, 5.6
training, 5.6
maintenance and 5.6
system management must be addressed. 5.6
Proposal Preparation Instructions
F. Operations
The contractor must clearly and comprehensively
discuss the functional capabilities provided for the
user.
The design of the Integrated Work Station must be
clearly presented with emphasis on intersegment
interface impacts, human engineering, communications
and growth potential.
Alternatives considered and a comprehensive
justification for the preferred approach must be
presented.
Software impacts related to the eventual addition
of increased numbers of stations up to the FOC
configuration must be discussed.
Productivity consideration must be addressed. 5.7
User capabilities in BOC, 5.7
IOC, and 5.7
FOC time frames must be made clear. 5.7
?
The contractor must discuss both intrasegment and
intersegment interface design 5.9%~
and present rationale for the design. 5.9.3
UNCLASSI 0`i ED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
Proprosal Preparation Instructions
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
J. Security
The contractor shall specifically address the design
relative to intrasegment and
5.10
intersegment security requirements.
5.10
%'~ Criteria addressed at high level, supporting detail distributed
throughout Section 5.
?
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
Section: 20.1.1 (Section 5)
PROPOSAL
SECTION
Proposal Evaluation Criteria NUMBER
The clarity, completeness and reasonableness of the 5.2
allocation of segment requirements into the design
the clarity and credibility of performance budget 5.2.1
allocations.
The clarity and completeness of the design (BOC, IOC, 5.2*
FOC).
The technical merit of the design with emphasis on 5.2%r
performance,
human engineering, 5.2*
simplicity, 5.2'fi
transition impact, 5.2%`~
communications, 5.2*
data base, and 5.2*
inter-segment interfaces. 5.2%`
The degree to which the design was successfully 5.1
substantiated as meeting key driving functional
requirements.
The maturity of the design such that cost/schedules 5.2*
estimates are realistic
with emphasis on risks being adequately understood, 5.2.2
design issues recognized and addressed and 5.2.2
the planned use of proven concepts and technology. 5.2.2
The extent and nature. of the risk inherent in 5.2.2
the proposed design.
The clarity, comprehensiveness and degree of ingenuity 5.8
expressed in the integrated Work Station design
with special emphasis on the satisfaction of interseg- 5.8
ment operations concepts and interfaces and
the degree of human engineering employed to provide 5.8
a desirable user interface.
The effectiveness of the design in maximizing 5.2%~
the operability and maintainability of the segment.
%Y Criteria addressed at high level, supporting detail distributed
throughout Section 5.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
?
?
The contractor must clearly and completely describe
the tools and methodologies used in the validation
of segment performance.
Emphasis should be placed in the appropriateness
of and previous experience with these tools
and methodologies.
The proposal must clearly and comprehensively
state the objectives,
processing activity accomplished in the validations
of segment performance.
The results of the segment performance analysis must
be clearly and concisely stated and must clearly
demonstrate that the proposed design will meet
segment performance requirements.
Performance sensitivities, performance issues
and any further studies required must be
completely discussed.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
6.1.1, 6.2.1
6.3.1, 6.4.1
6.1.1, 6.2.1
6.3.1, 6.4.1
6.1.2, 6.2.2
6.3.2, 6.4.2
6.1.2, 6.2.2,
6.3.2, 6.4.2
6.1.2, 6.2.2,
6.3.2, 6.4.2
6.1.3, 6.2.3
6.3.3, 6.4.3
6.1.3, 6.2.3
6.3.3, 6.4.3
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
The extent to which the contractor demonstrates a
clear and comprehensive methodology for the
analysis of segment performance.
The clarity, traceability and technical adequacy
of the segment performance analysis
with special emphasis on model validation,
driving requirements traceability and
key assumptions.
The degree to which the design was successfully
substantiated as meeting key performance requirements.
The clarity, completeness and validity of the RMA
analysis, conclusions and impact on segment design.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
6.1.2, 6.1.3
6.2.2, 6.2.3
6.1.2, 6.2.2
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
The contractor must demonstrate to the sponsor that a
thorough and open study of risks for BOC, IOC, and FOC
has been conducted, that the rationale applied was
reasonable and that all areas of unusual risk have
been identified.
Key development items must be identified and
their risks addressed.
The contractor must clearly and comprehensively
describe the approach and specific plans for
reducing the risks identified above.
A reasonable and sufficient program of risk reduction
with specific objectives and schedules must be presented.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.2.1,
7.2.2
7.2.3,
7.2.4
7.2.5
7.2.1,
7.2.2
7.2.3,
7.2.4
7.2.5
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSi Ft EU
?
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The extent to which the contractor has demonstrated
a sound technical risk assessment program and has
sufficiently and adequately identified the key program
risks.
The clarity, completeness and reasonableness of the
contractor's planned risk reduction program.
UNCLASSIFIED
7.2.1, 7.2.2
7.2.3
7.2.4, 7.2.5
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNC;LAS~iF-ItU
?
?
Proposal Preparation Instructions
A. Plans and Schedules
The proposal must reflect a thorough, clear and traceable
transition plan and schedule.
Responsibilities,
issues, dependencies,
user and operational impacts, and
intrasegment considerations, as a minimum, must be
addressed.
All phasing must be clearly described and justified.
An overview of the transitions must be presented.
B. Software
The contractor must expand the overview and clearly
describe the detailed plans for transitioning the
software through BOC, IOC, and FOC.
C. Hardware
The contractor must expand the overview and clearly
describe the detailed plans for transitioning the data
base through BOC, IOC, and FOC.
Plans for maintaining data currency, recovery procedures,
and data integrity must be discussed.
The contractor must discuss plans for transitioning
the communications, interfaces (non-user terminal)
through BOC, IOC, and FOC.
Delta Data 5600 terminals and associated communications
equipment, data paths and software and the introduction
of new terminals through BOC, IOC, and FOC.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
8.0, 8.1
8.1.1, 8.1.2
8.1.3
8.1.1, 8.1.2
8.1.3
s.l.l, 8.1.2
8.1.1, 8.1.2
8.1.3
8.1.1
8.1.2
8.0, $.1
8.1.1, 8.1.2
8.1.3
8.2
$.1.1, 8.1.2
8.1.3
8.4
8.1.1, 8.1.2
8.1.3
8.6
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The clarity, completeness and soundness of the 8.1.1, 8.1.2
transition plan and schedule with emphasis on the 8.1.3
BOC and the rationale for any incremental deliveries.
The clarity of the software and hardware transition
and the degree to which the transition plan
minimizes throwaway software, facility impacts
and system outages.
The degree to which the transition minimizes impacts
on users.
The clarity and completeness of the data base
transition plans and demonstrated understanding
of the risks involved.
8.1.1, 8.1.2
8.1.3, 8.3
The clarity, completeness and reasonableness of the 8.5
communication and user terminal transitions.
?
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
For each of the following areas of concern the contrac- 9.0
for must list specific requirements for Government fur-
nished equipment, services, or facilities. Delivery
schedules and potential impacts if not provided must
be stated.
C. Communications
Specifically address LAN/BIU requirements for the
development facility.
D.
E.
F.
Data
Documents
Services
G.
Other
?
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UIV(.:LA~Si t-I tU
?
?
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
GFE Requirements
No evaluation criteria was presented.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAI,
SECTION
NUMBER
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
All offeror recommendations which will provide the 10.0
sponsor with technical options for meeting the
milestone requirements faced by the DJC segment
shall be consolidated in this section. Reference to
other technical proposal sections should be made
where appropriate.
A. Delay implementation of the wide band IWS capabil- 10.0
ity until System FOC. Preacquisition planning and
system engineering activities for this capability
may begin prior to BOC; however, acquisition award
for the FOC capability will be no earlier than
1 October 1984.
Under this option the government would furnish all 10.0
required IOC Terminals (Delta Data with modifica-
tions as defined by the contractor) or the contrac-
tor may furnish the narrow band capability IOC
terminals of his choosing, in either event to cost
no more that including development cost.
B. The government is considering the installation of 10.0
a Univac 1100/8X (X=1, 2) as a maintenance support
processor in FY83 to meet the operational needs of
NPIC. The contractor is to consider the use of
only the existing 1100/84 with an 1100/8X (or its
equivalent) to support NPIC operations until after
IOC. The sizing of the 1100/8X (or its equivalent)
shall be defined by the contractor.
In developing this option,.the contractor shall
specifically address the use of shared processor
resources for both contractor development and NPIC
operational maintenance support.
UNCLASSIFIED
STAT
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSiFIE?
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
20.1.1.8 Alternate Technical Approaches 10.0
The degree of risk and/or cost reduction effectiveness
of the alternate technical approaches to meeting the
D/C segment requirements.
UIVCLASSi FI ED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
Volume: III - Management
,e
Section: 2. Corporate Commitment
Proposal Preparation Instructions
A. Corporate Structure
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The proposal must reflect an accurate corporate organi- 2.1
zational structure and
must reflect clearly the relation of the D/C Segment 2.1
program within the Corporate structure for the prime
and all principal subcontractors
B. Corporate Support
The proposal must clearly present the plan for corporate 2.2
support to the project.
Corporate and program responsibilities, reporting meth- 2.2
ods, reviews, problem detection and resolution methods,
as a minimum, must be discussed. Principal subcon~rac-
tors must be included in this discussion.
The proposal must define facility requirements and 2.3
present corporate plans to acquire such facilities on a 2.3
schedule commensurate with project requirements.
Potential project risks related to facilities must be 2.3
discussed.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
Volume: III - Management
Section: 20.1.2
The extent to which the corporation is clearly com-
mitted to provide the resources necessary to insure
that the D/C Segment meets its objectiveness on schedule
and within cost.
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The clarity and soundness of the corporate plans to 2.2
monitor and control the project
with emphasis on the visibility provided this project 2.1, 2.2
within the corporate structure
The clarity, completeness and soundness of the contrac- 2.3
for plans for providing adequate facilities for the
performance of this contract.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
Volume: III - Management
Section: 3. Project Management
A. Organization
The contractor must present a clear description of the 3.1, 3.1.1
project organization including the organization of the
major subcontractors.
Defined responsibilities and the Organizational Break- 3.1.2
down Structure (OBS) must be related to the WBS and SOW.
Responsibilities for deliverables items must be expli- 3:1.2, 3.3
citly defined.
B. Project Management
The proposal must present a clear and concise manner an
overview of the project management plan.
Policies, procedures and methodologies in tasking, re-
view and reporting as a minimum must be presented.
The plan must relate to the project control discussion
in Section 4 and the project plan discussed in
Section 5.
Provisions for interacting with the Government and pro-
viding visibility to the Government must be discussed.
The extent of the project manager's authority over all 3.2
resources must be discussed.
3.2.1, 3.2.2,
3.3
s
C. Subcontractor Management
The subcontractor management plan must be presented.
Subcontractors responsibilities, review procedures,
Government visibility and the interrelationship of all
subcontractors must be discussed as a minimum.
D. Security
3.0, 3.2.1,
3.2.2, 3.3
The contractor must present an overview of the proposed 3.4, 3.4.1,
security plan in a manner such that the sponsor is as- 3.4.2
sured that the contractor can and will satisfactorily
comply with security requirements.
As a minimum, facility, ADP, personnel, access control, 3.4.1, 3.4.2
and document control shall be discussed.
The contractor shall present a clear and comprehensive 3.5
discussion of all programmatic issues of concern and
shall provide suggestions for resolving the issues.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
20.1.2.2 Project Management
The soundness of the project organization,
the clarity of defined organizational responsibilities
and the degree to which responsibilities related to the
WBS.
The clarity, completeness, consistency and soundness of
the project management plan
with emphasis on the subcontractor management plans and
relationship to the project control plans and segment
development plans.
The effectiveness and appropriations of the project is-
sues surfaced and recommendations made.
The acceptability of the project security plans.
The completeness, conciseness and clarity of the State-
ment of Work with emphasis on the degree of adherence
and traceability to the W$S and extent to which the SOW
manifests the Program Implementation Directive guidelines.
?
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
Number
3.1, 3.1.1
3.1.2, 3.2
3.2.1, 3.3
3.2.1, 3.3
3.4, 3.4.1,
3.4.2
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The contractor must present a complete and concise dis- 4.0 (all)
cussion of how project management intends to control
this project.
Approaches, methodologies, tools and related experience 4.0 (all)
must be discussed.
Plans for control of subcontractors must be addressed 4.1, 4.2.1,
4.3, 4.4,
4.5
methods for early detection and resolution of problems 4.1, 4.2..1,
shall be discussed. 4.2.2
A clear presentation of cost and schedule control and 4.2 (all)
reporting methods must be presented.
Provisions for sponsor visibility must be discussed. 4.1, 4.2.1,
4.2.2
The contractor must present an overview of the project 4.3
quality assurance plan such that the sponsor is assured
that the program is adequate and that a quality con-
trolled product will be delivered.
D. Configuration Management
The contractor must present an overview of the project 4.4
configuration management plan such that the sponsor is
assured that the plan is adequate and capable of pro-
viding the type and quality of control required in a
peoject of this scope.
E. Logistics Management
The contractor must present a comprehensive overview of 4.5
his proposed logistics management plan.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
a
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The clarity and soundness of proposed plans and method- 4.0 (all)
ologies for planning, controlling and reporting the ac-
tivities of this project to ensure an on-schedule,
within cost delivery.
The completeness and soundness of the plans for main- 4.2 (all)
taining cost and schedule control and appropriate. re-
porting to the sponsor.
The degree to which the contractor demonstrates~an ade- 4.3
quate quality assurance program.
The degree to which the contractor demonstrates an ef- 4.4
fective Configuration Management plan.
The extend and soundness of the Contractor's Logistics 4.5
Management Plan.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNC;LAS51 F-I tU
?
Volume: III - Management
The contractor must provide a comprehensive project
schedule showing, as a minimum, all project milestones,
major program reviews, major internal reviews, deliver-
ables, test activity and transition activities. Phased
or incremental program reviews must be justified if
presented.
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The proposal must present a comprehensive overview of
the system engineering plan.
The plan must discuss the organization and responsibili-
ties of the System Engineering group:
Objectives and plans for the analysis of requirements,
design, performance and risk;
plans for trade studies;
participation in interface control, test, configuration
management, logistics support, and performance
mnitoring;
provisions for design reviews;
schedules; and
methodologies and tools.
There should be adequate traceability from the plan to
the OBS and the Statement of Work.
C. Software Development
The proposal must present a comprehensive overview of
the software development plan.
The plan must provide an adequate discussion of the or-
ganization and responsibilities of the software develop-
ment groups; software management and
technical control methods; software QA methodology;
schedule and milestones;
configuration control; documentation and training meth-
ods; standards; and methodologies and tools.
There should be adequate traceability from the plan to
the OBS and the Statement of Work.
UNCLASSIFIED
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.3.2
5.3.3
5.3.2
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UN(;LASSI FI ED
Volume: III - Management
Section: 5. Project Plans
D. Hardware Development
The proposal must present a comprehensive overview of 5.4
the hardware development plan.
Organization and responsibilities must be discussed. 5.4.1
Management and technical control methods and plans must 5.4.2
be presented.
A detailed schedule and discussion of milestones must 5.4.3
be included.
There should be adequate traceability from the plan to 5.4.1
the OBS and the Statement of Work.
The proposal must present a clear, concise and compre- 5.5 (all)
hensive overview of the contractor's approach to seg-
ment verification and an overview of the segment test
plan.
The verification plan must discuss methodology of test 5.5.2
and traceability of requirements into the test plan.
The segment test plan must define that set of tests 5.5.2, 5.5.3
which will be required throughout the development, in-
tegration, factory test and site acceptance phases and
shall discuss testing philosophy, methods and tools.
?
The proposal must present a clear, concise and compre- 5.6 (all)
hensive overview of the Contractor's proposed Opera-
tions and Maintenance Plan.
The overview must discuss, through FOC, the 0&M organi- 5.6.1, 5.6.2
zation, philosophy, responsibilities, staffing, work
flow, reporting mechanisms, configuration control, pro-
blem reporting and resolution, and the site versus fac-
tory role.
G. The proposal must present a brief description of 5.7 (all)
the Contractor's plans for training of the Govern-
ment instructors.
User and Operator training packages must be discussed. 5.7.1
Facility requirements, computer system requirements and 5.7.1, 5.7.2,
impacts, Government personnel requirements, and 5.7.3
training approach and concepts, as a minimum, must also
be discussed.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
20.1.2.5 Project Plans
The comprehensiveness, logic and credibility of the Pro-
ject Schedule.
The extent to which the contractor demonstrates a com-
plete, coherent and timely System Engineering Plan,
demonstrate as appropriate use of methodologies and
tools
identifies appropriate studies and trates, and
relates to the SOW and the other plans.
The clarity, completeness and reasonableness of the
software and hardware development plans with emphasis
on
methodologies, tools, responsibilities and credibility.
The degree of compatibility with SOW tasks and Project
Schedules.
The clarity and completeness, consistency and adequacy
of the segment verification and test plans.
The clarity and completeness of the 0&M plan with em-
phasis on
organization definition, staffing requirements, posi-
tion responsibilities and 0&M philosophy.
The clarity and completeness of the training plan with
emphasis on the schedule, resource requirements, and
deliverables.
?
The extent to which subcontractor roles and responsibil-
ities are clearly defined.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
5.3.1, 5.3.2,
5.4.1, 5.4.2
5.3.1, 5.4.2
5.5 (all)
5.6
5.6.1, 5.6.2
5.7 (all)
5.2.1, 5.3.1,
5.4.1, 5.5.1,
5.6.1, 5.7.1
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The contractor must identify and justify all key project 6.1
positions and identify the person who shall be committed
to that position. Resumes are required to present the
qualifications of these prople. The contractor must
show that all key personnel are cleared or immediately
clearable on the day of contract award.
The proposal must present a clear and unambiguous defi- 6.2
nition of development staffing needs. A staffing pro-
file by fiscal year by skill and year must be presented.
The contractor must supply convincing evidence that the 6.2
people required can be made available in the time frames
needed.
? Plans for acquiring these people must be presented. 6.1, 6.2
Career management authority and reporting responsibil- 6.2
ities for project personnel must be discussed.
The proposal must reflect the clearance requirements for 6.2
the non-key personnel and substantiate that the person-
nel being made available are cleared, clearable or can
reasonably expect to be cleared by the time they are
needed.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UN(;LA55i t-I tU
?
?
PROPOSAI.
SECTION
NUMBER
The identification of key management and technical po- 6.1
sitions and
Proposal Evaluatio Criteria
20.1.2.4 Personnel
the commitment of cleared, experienced and appropriate 6.1, 6.2
personnel to those positions.
The clarity, completeness and credibility of the manning 6.2
profile and staffing plan with
emphasis on the depth of corporate resources with ade- 6.2
quate security clearances available in a timely manner
to provide the necessary staffing.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
?
Section: 7. Experience and Past Performance
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The Contractor must discuss previous experience that is 7.0
directly correlated with this project either in size,
scope, technical performance or methodologies employed.
Final cost, schedule and technical performance must be
summarized for each project. Each project discussion
must include a name, address and telephone number of
the Contracting Officer.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UN(;LASSi t-I tU
?
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
20.1.2.6 Experience and Past Performance
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The degree to which the contractor relates appropriate 7.0 (all)
experience and correlates the experience to this task.
The degree of demonstrated cost, schedule, and technical
performance sources on previous projects.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UIV(:L/-~5~ii t-I tU
?
Volume: III - Management
Section: 8. Alternate Management Approaches
Proposal Preparation Instructions
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
All Offeror recommendations which will provide the spon- 8.0
sor with management or programmatic options for reducing
the risk or costs associated with meeting the DJC Seg-
ment milestone requirements shall be consolidated in
this section. Reference to other proposal sections
should be made where appropriate.
The contractor shall specifically discuss the program- 8.0
matic impacts of the Government directed detailed in
Section II, Specific Instructions, P. II-12, Section 10,
Alternate Technical Approaches as amended. .
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
20.1.2.8 Alternate Management Approach
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The degree of risk and/or cost reduction of the alter- 8.0
Hate management approaches to meeting the D/C Segment
requirements.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSi FI ED
?
?
?
Proposal Preparation Instructions
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
Provide an overview of project costs, assumptions, 2.1, 2.2
and cost drivers. 2.3
UNCLASS10=1ED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
Section: 3. Project Data
Proposal Preparation Instructions
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
A. DD633 3.,1
B. Price ($) by GWBS Level 2 Element by FY82-87 3.2
Provide TOTAL PRICE for each GWBS level 2 element
in the format shown as EXHIBIT 1. Include forward
pricing rates and inflation as appropriate.
C. Price ($) by FY82-87 in 82 Dollars 3.3
Provide TOTAL PRICE for each fiscal years in
constant 1982 dollars using the format shown
as EXHIBIT 2.
D. Manhours by GWBS Level 2 Element by FY82-87 3.4
Provide TOTAL MANHOURS for each GWBS level 2 element
in the format show as EXHIBIT 3. Provide total
? manhours for prime contractor and each principal
subcontractor for each GWBS level 2 element in
format shown as EXHIBIT 3. Use separate sheet
for each contractor.
E. Distribution By Organization of GWBS Level 2
Element Manhours
Provide percent of TOTAL MANHOURS per GWBS level 2 for
PRIME and each SUBCONTRACTOR. Use the format shown as
EXHIBIT 4.
F. Price ($) For Non-Labor By GWBS Level 2 Elements
3.6
By FY82-87 .
Provide the Total Price of Non-labor (Total Price Minus
Price for Direct Labor) in the format shown as EXHIBIT 1.
G. Cost ($) For GFE
3.7
Provide the cost for all GFE by GWBS level 2 element by
FY82-87 in the format shown as EXHIBIT 1.
?
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSi FI ED
Proporsal Preparation Instructions
Repeat the following information for the Prime Contractor
and each principal Subcontractor.
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
A. Backup Data 4.1
1. Labor Skills and Rates - 4.1.1
Provide an explanation of labor skill levels and
rates.
Give examples by name of personnel working on the
DCP contract for each skill level.
Indicate if the base labor rate is based on
2,080 hours or a lesser number of hours.
Describe accounting and estimating procedures
for vacation, sick leave, holidays, etc.
Indicate estimated number of days for each
?
paid leave category and basis therefore.
Furnish the company overtime premioums and
night differentials and under what conditions.
2. Other Rates 4.1.2
Provide information on rate determination for
overhead, CAS 414, travel/TDY, inflation, and
any other rates pertinent to your proposal.
Provide a list of travel by FY82-87 giving
destination purpose, ~~ of people and ~~ of days
grouped by destination or purpose.
?
B. Organizational Breakdown Structure To GWBS Matrix 4.2
Provide the Company organization breakdown structure as it
will be applied to the GWBS by manhours.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
?
Section: 5. Assumptions
Proposal Preparation Instructions
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
Provide a complete discussion of all assumptions 5~1 through
used to develop the costs contained in this proposal. 5.12
Reference all discussions to the pertinent GWBS elements. 5.1 through
5.12
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
Proposal Preparation Instructions
Provide a complete discussion of all key cost
drivers including explicit references to all
affected GWBS elements.
References to discussions in the Technical and
Management Volumes should also be included
as appropriate.
UNCLASSIFIED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
6t1 through
6.7
6.1 through
6.7
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSi FI ED
?
?
?
.Proposal Preparation Instructions
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
Provide a complete discussion of proposal 7.1 through
fee provisions. ~?5
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
Section: 8. Offeror Schedule of Funding Requirements
Proposal Preparation Instructions
Offerors are requested to provide a schedule of
their funding requirements, including the following
performance periods:
Award to 30 September 1982
1 October 1982 to 30 September 1983
1 October 1983 to 30 September 1984
1 October 1984 to 30 September 1985
1 October 1985 to 30 September 1986
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The magnitude of the proposed total D/C Segment cost 2.1, 3.1,
and the appropriateness of phasing for BOC, IOC and 3.2, 3.3, 8,
FOC. C6, C7, C8
UNCLASSiO`IED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
Proposal Evaluation Criteria NUMBER
The scope, significance, degree of definition, 6.1 through
and clarity of key cost drivers. 6.7
C9, C11
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The degree of reasonableness, adequacy and 2.1, 2.3,
credibility of all manpower and other direct 4.1, 4.3, Cl
costs.
The extent to which assumtions and risk 2.2, 5.1
consdieration have been made clear. through 5.12
UNCLASSi FI ED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The extent to which the contractor has substantiated 3.1 through
how segment costs were derived and adequately 3.7, 4.3
related them to the cost assumptions and risk C1, C10
consideration. 5.1 through.
5.12
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
PROPOSAI.
SECTION
NUMBER
20.1.3.5 Completeness
The extent to which the proposal
adheres
2.1,
4.1,
to the RFP guidance and contains
necessary supporting data.
all
4.2,
8.
?
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
20.1.3.6 Traceability
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The degree to which the proposal is consistent
regarding traceability into the CWBS, Technical 4.3
and Management Volumes, Statement of Work, and C1 through
from higher to lower levels of cost C5, C10
breakout.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The extent to which all narrative, tables, graphs, 5.2
etc., present a clear and unambiguous proposal, C6 through
C8
The degree to which the contractor successfully 5.2
isolated BOC, IOC, and FOC costs. C6 through
C8
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
The extent to which the contractor has developed
innovative fee provisions which provide incentives
to economically achieve the desired performance
delivered on schedule at target cost.
The extent to which the contractor is prepared
to share risk.
UNCLASSI FI ED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
Approved For Release 2007/06/18 :CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSIFIED
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
2.4.2.5 Volume V - Alternate Configuration Analysis VOLUME V
The contractor shall present a competitive, alternate 1, 2
vendor, hardware configuration which will support the
proposed design in Volume II.
Associated costs and potential project impacts must be 2, 3
discussed.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSI FI ED
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The FOC hardware configuration, by CI, must be presented 1.2
to a level equivalent to that presented in Volume II 1.2
for the preferred alternative.
Where one-to-one replacements are not possible or fea- 1.2
sible, the alternatives must be clearly presented.
RFP Instruction
Section 1. Hardware Configuration
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLAS~iFIED
?
?
The contractor must present a complete discussion of
potential design impacts and risks,
development impacts and risks,
schedule impacts and risks and
performance impacts and risks if the Gogernment should
choose the alternate configuration.
Complete and rational justification is required.
justification is required.
UNCLASSi FI ED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
2.1,
2.5
2.2,
2.5
2.3,
2.5
2,4
2.1,
2.2,
2.3,
2.4
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSi FI ED
?
?
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
The contractor must present ROM cost deltas at level 2 3.0
of the GWBS that reflect the effort required to imple-
ment the recommended design on the alternate hardware
configuration.
UNCLASSi FI ED
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
 Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9
UNCLASSI FI ED
?
?
Volume: V - Alternate Configuration Analysis
Section: 20.1.4 Alternate Configuration Analysis
The extent to which the contractor has credibility and
adequately configured an alternate hardware configura-
tion for the proposed design.
The extent to which the contractor has effectively eval-
uated and discussed the impacts of the alternate con-
figuration on the porposed SOW tasks.
The magnitude, reasonabliness, completeness, consistency
and clarity of costs and the degree tp which the costs
have been substantiated.
UNCLASSi FI ED
PROPOSAL
SECTION
NUMBER
1.1,
1.2
2.1,
2.2,
2.3,
2.4,
2.5
3.0
Approved For Release 2007/06/18: CIA-RDP84T00037R000500070001-9