TWA HIJACKING

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79M00467A002500090012-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 26, 2002
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 16, 1976
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79M00467A002500090012-3.pdf206.53 KB
Body: 
Approved For' Lease 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP79M0046 QiQ02500090012- 16 September 1976 J MEMORANDUM FOR: Ambassador Douglas Heck Director, Office to Combat Terrorism FROM SUBJECT TWA Hijacking 25X1A 1. As a participant in the management of the recent TWA hijacking, I would like to communicate to you a few of my thoughts regarding the handling of 25X1A the incident. I first want to express my appreciation for the opportunity to work with you, and I congratulate you on your performance in a most difficult role. I believe the outcome of this incident should be considered successful in that a minimum number of casualties were sustained and the perpetrators were apprehended for prosecution. 2. Organizational problems became apparent very early. I do not believe that the command and control aspects were understood in the same way by all the parties concerned. FBI and FAA apparently have a reasonably well worked out jurisdictional agreement for domestic skyjacking; when this event became international, and the Department of State "took control," the apparent change in leadership was probably resented and compounded an already difficult leadership problem. Indeed, the two organizations that, had the most control over the incident (TWA and host goernment) were the least subject to influence by State decisions. In developing a better organizational response to this type of incident it must be made very clear where the final authority lies, and a system to involve better liaison with the., private sector should. be considered. However, although jurisdictional problems can probably be solved by drawing up appropriate agreements among Agencies, operational success cannot be assured until there is mutual trust among the actors involved. This can only be achieved on the personal level. Stated simply, it means knowing whom to call for whatever information or action is desired. This ability seemed to be sadly lacking during this incident. Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP79M00467AO02500090012-3 Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP79M00 67A002500090012-3 3. The logistical and communication problems at the State operation center were solved to a great degree by moving to the FAA. The implications for developing a better physical plant are clear. 4. The frustrations that always occur in an incident of this nature generate a good deal of anger. In this incident several scapegoats developed, among which were the CIA, FBI, New York Police Department, Government of France, etc. This is not necessarily a bad thing, for discharge of anger in one direction can be important to prevent its being discharged in a potentially more dangerous direction. However, it can also be counterproductive in preventing the free flow of ideas and information. Again the issue of trust is important. 5. What I consider to be a potentially very dangerous example of the development of frustration occurred toward the end of this incident. This was at the time when we were receiving information that the skyjackers on the aircraft were resistant-to the suggestions of their comrade in the tower to give up. I noted at that time a surge of impatience on the part of many of the people in the command center. Of course, this is quite understandable. The skyjackers had been teasing us, and each time we anticipated their surrender they disappointed us. At this point there was talk in the room of the French storming the aircraft. What happened is that the phenomenon that we often. attribute to police forces began to occur in the presumably detached and objective observers and decision makers. An intolerable feeling of impotence and passivity was dealt with by a wish for action, and the concept of delay was all but forgotten (momentarily). 6. The problem of the interpretation and implementation of U.S. Government policy raised its ugly head throughout the incident. We have all talked about this at great length, and I know that you are aware of the importance of its resolution. One important aspect of it appeared to go unnoticed. It has to do with the responsibility of the host government. When the terrorists requested to speak to one of several U.S. Government officials, and we responded affirmatively, I am not aware that there was any consultation with the Government of France Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP79M00467AO02500090012-3 Approved For j1ease 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP79M0046 ,Q02500090012-3 about our decision. If there was none, it appears to me that this would amount to usurping some. of the responsibility for which we hold them accountable. I wonder if this may explain in part some of what appeared to us to be French intransigence, especially with respect to facilitating our communications. 7. I have spoken to you (both before and during the current incident) of some of the problems that .arise in a crisis of this nature. The above points are not all inclusive, and I hope we have an opportunity to discuss them in greater detail. 25X1A Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP79M00467AO02500090012-3 SENDER WILL CHECK C Uri LASSIFIED OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP "O NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INITIALS SAG 2 3 4 S 6 ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION COMMENT FILE RETURN CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE Remarks: 25X1A 25X1A 67- Att: DDA 76-4748 25X1A FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: NAME, ADDRE38 AND PHONE NO. DATE DD/Administration 7D24 II 9/23/76 UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET ~M$ NO. 237 Use previous editions '-?' 25X1A Itt: DDA 76-4748 Memo to Ambassador Douglas. Heck,: Director, Office of fr OMS, Subj : TWA Hijacking Distribution: Orig RS - DDCI w/cy att ?,. S -= EP. w/att 1 RS - DDA Subject w/att 1 RS - DDA Chrono w/o att 25X1 1, RS Chrono w/o att 1 -' D/OMS w/o att Combat Terrorism Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP79M00467A00250009Q01`2-3.