LETTER TO MR. ALLEN W. DULLES FROM LAURA HAZELWOOD

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 62
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: August 14, 2002
• Sequence Number: 77
• Publication Date: December 5, 1960
• Content Type: LETTER

Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CJA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
Mac. Laura P. hazelwood
Approved'For Release,2002/08/21: CIA-PDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
 \p
rove qtr, i
UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
TO
NAME AND ADDRESS
INITIALS
DATE
I
Col. Grogan
f IBCC
(. 2
2
ER
3
4
5
6
X
ACTION
DIRECJEPLY
PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL
"PATCH
RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT
FILE
RETURN
CONCURRENCE
X
INFORMATION
SIGNATURE
Remarks :
For your information and whateverrction
you may deem appropriate.
0e t
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. DATE
Ut. to the DCX 12/23/60
p rov
d KdKR6ffd9&EP00A/08/k1 cQN 8eBO 676 OOMOV
FORM N
I APR 55 23 7 which may be used.
(40)
U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1955-0-342531
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077,-4
Approved For Release 2002/08/2#' _ 1 4-RbOig60036'130'T>
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R00
PETER J. DOESWYCK
made his theological studies at the University
of Freiburg, Switzerland (1926-1933), and was
ordained a Roman Catholic priest for the
Diocese of Omaha, Nebraska. In 1938 he re-
signed from the priesthood. For the past 25
years Peter Doeswyck has specialized in the
studies of the Fathers, the Middle Ages and
the History of the Church. Having read every
available book written from the time of Christ
till the Reformation, he is recognized as one
of the greatest students of the original sources
of the Middle Ages. He has contributed many
articles to religious magazines and was granted
an honorary degree of Doctor of Divinity by
the Lighthouse Bible College in 1951. Through
his hundreds of lectures on Church History
he has gained national recognition.
CATHOLIC VICTORY
IN 1960?
Peter J. Doeswyck, D.D.
Former Priest and Church Historian
Approved For Release 2002/0$/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80
Printed in the United States
First edition:
First printing, Aug. 3, 1959
Second Printing, Sept. 10, 1959
Third printing, Oct. 19, 1959
Fourth printing, Jan. 25, 1960
Fifth printing, April 22, 1960
Second edition:
First printing, July 15, 1960
Second printing, Sept. 15, 1960
Copyright 1959, 1960
by
Peter J. Doeswyck
PETER J. DoESwYCK, D.D.
P. O. Box 1651
Long Beach, Calif.
The constitutions of Catholic countries like Spain, Argen-
tina, Paraguay, etc., require that the president or premier be
of the Roman Catholic faith, thus disqualifying all Protestants,
Jews and atheists. Constitutions of Protestant States often
required the candidate for office to believe in the divinity of
Christ, the inspiration of the Bible, etc. The constitution of
Texas still requires belief in "a Supreme Being" (Art. 1, Section
4). Because the United States has millions of good citizens
who are of Jewish, Arab, Chinese and Japanese extraction,
while millions of others have no religious affiliation at all, our
Constitution has ruled that "no religious test shall ever be
required as a qualification to any office" (Art. 6).
The sixth article of our Constitution refers to the candidate,
not to the voter. If it could be proved that the President of
Argentina was of the Jewish faith, his election would be invalid
and his authority illegal. If it could be proved that the Presi-
dent of the United States was of the Jewish faith, his election
would remain valid. No religious test, creed or affiliation is
required. As the sixth article does not refer to the voter, it
could not imply that the voter may not examine and weigh
the religious belief and philosophy of a candidate. Our Consti-
tution does not regulate the personal likes and dislikes of the
voter. The religious belief and philosophy of a candidate, such
as his stand on freedom of religion, separation of Church and
State, birth control, the overthrow of the government by force,
etc., are far more important than his personality and many
other qualifications which may have contributed to his election.
If the Constitution forbade our votes to be influenced by
religious issues, or by our religious preferences, it would not
only mean that millions of votes have been invalid, but that
the voter is no longer free to vote for the man of his choice.
It would then be equally unconstitutional for Catholics to vote
for a Catholic candidate because of his Catholic faith. The
existence of a "Catholic vote", however, is a recognized fact.
We all know, for example, that the Mennonites are a nice
and harmless group of Christians. Their religion holds that it
is a sin to bear arms in defense of one's country. As the President
CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
Approved For Release 2002/01 /21
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : Cl
of the United States is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed
Forces and has the duty to protect our land against our
enemies, there would be very few Protestants or Catholics who
would vote a Mennonite into the White House. This is using
good common sense. Those who would call this a case of bigotry
and anti-Protestantism are maliciously confusing the issue.
We all know, for example, that the Jehovah Witnesses are a
non-Catholic group who believe that it is a sin to salute the
flag. Voters who do not like an American President who would
be afraid to salute the American flag have the right to vote
for someone other than a Jehovah Witness. Those who main-
tain that the raising of such a religious issue is unconstitutional
are purposely misinterpreting our constitutional laws for selfish
reasons.
We all know, for example, that the Roman Catholic religion
differs from all other Christian faiths in that it has a hierarchy
which opposes democracy and which rules dictatorially over its
subjects. Rome uses anathemas and excommunications to force
Catholic leaders to obey its commands. Because the Pope is the
ruler of an independent State, and because every devout
Catholic believes that it is a sin to disobey his commands, many
non-Catholics hesitate to vote a subject of this foreign ruler into
the highest office of the land. It is their constitutional right and
privilege to cast their vote for the man of their own choice. To
legislate the preferences and decisions of voters is to abolish
democracy itself. To accuse the American voter (80% non-
Catholic) of bigotry and anti-Catholicism is in itself an act of
bigotry, of anti-Protestantism, if not anti-Americanism.
There are more Catholic representatives in Washington. than
of any other denomination. The local governments of our cities
are predominantly Catholic. It is almost impossible for a
Protestant to become mayor of such corrupt cities as Chicago.
It becomes evident that Protestants will be called bigots until
they have sold their birth rights one hundred per cent.
Non-Catholic presidents have been extremely cautious never
to use the power and dignity of their office to further the cause
of their particular creed. Many non-Catholic voters fear that a
Catholic President could be made an agent to promote both the
spiritual and political aims of Rome. Protestant. groups, for
6 Approved For Release 2002/0
example, are struggling to hold their own in cases of mixed
marriages (a totalitarian church has an advantage over a
democratic one). A Catholic President would not only give
Catholicism more prestige, but it would become more difficult
for Protestant parents to convince their children not to forsake
their own religion when marrying a Catholic. There is the fear
that our newspapers would give in to the constant pressure of
the Catholic press to show week after. week the President not
only worshipping in the Cathedral of Washington, but kneeling
before his Cardinal and kissing his ring. The latter would create
the false impression that the President is not the first citizen
of the land. Whenever a Catholic President would have to make
a difficult decision which enters the realm of conscience-such
as to declare war or to use the atom bomb-he would have to
confide State, secrets to his confessor, i.e. to a member of the
hierarchy. Under penalty of excommunication a Catholic Presi-
dent could be forced to declare war on certain nations, thus
forcing American boys to fight the wars of the Vatican. The
Roman hierachy might pressure a Catholic President to appoint
certain Catholics to his Cabinet, to pack the Supreme Court
with Catholics, to re-interpret the Constitution, to advocate
public funds for Catholic schools, to use the power of the White
House and of Congressional Committees to oppose or vilify
those who dare to fight for separation of Church and State.
This book will examine the evidence on which such fears are
founded.
Peter J. Doeswyck
/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
7
 Pope's Condemnation of Democracy
Bull "Immortale Dei" ------------------------------------------------------------------
Oath and Creed of Presidential Candidate ------------------------------
Jesuits ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Syllabus of Errors ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom of Religion --------------------------------------------------------------------
Murder of non-Catholics --------------------------------------------------------------
No Salvation for non-Catholics ................................................
Catholic Men Organized into Pressure Groups ......................
Catholic judges ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catholic Doctors --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catholic Control of News ------------------------------------------------------------
Catholic Movie Stars --------------------------------------------------------------------
Catholic "Bosses" --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catholic Underworld --------------------------------------------------------------------
Catholic Police Force ------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Funds for Catholic Institutions ......................................
Catholic Immigrants ....................................................................
American History Rewritten ........................................................
American Textbooks Rewritten ................................................
Origin of the "Church" and of the "Roman Church" ............
Temporal Power of the Pope ......................................................
Forgeries of the Roman Church ................................................
Papal States ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
False Decretals ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Immunity of Roman Clergy ........................................................
Ecclesiastical Dungeons --------------------------------------------------------------
Military Draft ..............................................................................
Catholic Loyalty in War ..............................................................
Roman Law above American Law --------------------------------------------
Secret Concordats with the Vatican ..........................................
Rape of Ireland and England ....................................................
Fascism --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
page
11
13
19
22
25
26
27
29
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
37
38
40
41
42
43
44
45
45
46
46
49
50
50
52
53
54
56
8 Approved For Release 2002/08/
page
South American Dictators ............................................................ 58
Vatican Spy System ...................................................................... 59
Stepinac, Artukovic, Mindszenty ................................................ 59
Public Schools ................................................................................ 60
Public Funds for Private Schools ................................................ 64
Jesuit Infiltration .......................................................................... 66
Secret Monks and Nuns ................................................................ 71
Free War Time Travel .................................................................. 76
Vatican Intrigue in War .............................................................. 76
Ex-Priests in U. S ......................................................................... 78
History of Monachism ................................................................ 78
Immorality of Monks and Nuns .................................................. 79
Penal Institutions .......................................................................... 80
Immunity from Inspection .......................................................... 81
Silence of the Press ...................................................................... 85
President Subject to Rome ............................................................ 86
Separation of Church and State .................................................. 87
Senator Kennedy's Statement ...................................................... 89
Democracy Condemned .............................................................. 91
No Divorce .................................................................................... 92
No Civil Marriage .......................................................................... 93
Only One True Religion .............................................................. 95
Freedom of Religion .................................................................... 95
Lincoln's Assassination ................................................................ 96
Political History of the Church .................................................. 98
Corruption of the Papacy ............................................................ 100
Pope and Labor ............................................................................ 104
Anti-Protestant Smear Campaign .............................................. 106
Catholic Victory in 1960? ............................................................ 109
Al Smith's Creed ............................................................................ 111
Kennedy's Creed .......................................................................... 112
Conclusion ...................................................................................... 113
Appendix ........................................................................................ 114
Bibliography .................................................................................. 117
1 : CIA-RDP801301676R00360007QJ77-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R0036000
Hitler wrote `Mein Kampf', a blueprint of aggression, and no
one took him seriously till he actually invaded all of Europe.
It would be catastrophical if the free world would make the
same mistake by ignoring the papal blueprints for the destruc-
tion of democracy.
Pope Leo XIII (d. 1903) in his infallible Bull "Immortale
Dei" attacks the democratic movements in Protestant countries
and singles out the American form of democracy, though care-
fully avoiding the name of our country. He denounces as heresy
the American principle that all men are created equal. Freedom
of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of the press are
termed principles of "unbridled liberty" (effrenatae libertatis).
When President Lincoln defined democracy as a government of
the people, by the people and for the people, the Pope de-
nounced it as the Rule of the Mob. He condemned majority
rule, because the majority can be wrong and may prefer evil
and heresy to justice and truth. Hence, he concluded, a govern-
ment by the mob cannot be of God. He attacks the democratic
system of voting because it forever endangers the office of
those in power.
The Pope denounces the American system of civil marriages.
He maintains that civil powers are subservient and subject to
ecclesiastical authority, and receive their authority and juris-
diction from God (or His Vicar), not from the people. He de-
nounces as heresy the American principle that the State may
not favor one religion over the other. He condemns the Ameri-
can principle that man may follow his own conscience in mat-
ters of religion, and -may, worship God as he sees fit. He con-
demns the American principle of separation of Church and
,State, and he calls it an. invention of the "lovers of the most
shameless liberty" (ab impudentissimae libertatis amatoribus.)
Though forbidding Roman Catholic laymen to meddle in the
politics of Roman Catholic countries, the Pope instructs the
Roman Catholics of Protestant countries (America) to run for
public office. He explains that by doing so they do not publicly
approve the democratic way of life, but by infiltration they will
10 Approved For Release 2002/0821 : CIA-RDP80B01676R00360007p077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21
obtain the necessary power to "change" the present system, to
infuse Roman Catholic principles into American life and legis-
lation, and to make America Roman Catholic.
The Pope further explains that his Constitution and his laws
have priority over our Constitutional laws, and that all Roman
Catholics owe first and foremost allegiance and obedience to the
bishops of their church. No one is allowed to lead the double
life of pretending to be a Roman subject and an American citi-
zen at the same time whenever the laws of Rome conflict with
those of America. Last but not least, the pope instructs Roman
Catholic authors and newspapermen to forget their former
loyalties and to present the Roman cause in print everywhere.
Before we quote the most important passages of this papal
Bull, may we first refresh your memory with the terminology and
dates of a few American documents?
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, 1776.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that ALL MEN ARE
CREATED EQUAL, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable RIGHTS, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these
rights, governments are instituted among men, DERIVING
THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE CONSENT OF THE
GOVERNED."
BILL OF RIGHTS, 1791.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
RELIGION, or prohibiting the FREE exercise thereof; or
ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR OF THE
PRESS" (Amendment I).
LINCOLN'S GETTYSBURG ADDRESS, 1863.
"Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on
this continent a new nation, CONCEIVED IN LIBERTY, and
dedicated to the proposition that ALL MEN ARE CREATED
EQUAL. . . . that this nation, under God, shall have a new
birth of FREEDOM, and that GOVERNMENT OF THE
PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE shall not
perish from the earth."
Approved For
CONSTrrUTIO CHRISTIANA CHRISTIAN CONSTITUTION
or
"IMMORTALE DEI", ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII,
NOV. 1, 1885
Calling the demands of the masses for equality (egalite')
and for freedom of speech, of religion, of the press, etc., a
movement "OF UNBRIDLED LIBERTY' (ef f renatae liber-
tatis), Pope Leo (d. 1903) explains and condemns democracy
as follows:
"Eorum principiorum il-
lud est maximum: omnes ho-
mines, quemadmodum gene-
re naturaque similes intelli-
guntur, ita reapse esse in ac-
tione vitae inter se pares ...
cogitare de re qualibet quae
velit (agere quod lubeat),
libere posse ...
His informata disciplinis so-
cietate, -principatus non est
nisi populi voluntas, qui, ut
in sui ipsius unite est potes-
tas, ita sibimetipsi solus im-
perat . . . ita tamen ut im-
perii non tam jus, quam mu-
nus in eos transferat, idque
suo nomine exercendum.
In silentio jacet dominatio
divina ... (vel) principatus
cogitari posset ullus, cujus
non in Deo ipso causa et vis
et auctoritas tota resideat.
Quomodo, ut perspicitur, est
republica nihil aliud nisi ma-
gistra et gubernatrix sui mul-
"Of their (democratic) prin-
ciples this one is the most impor-
tant: that ALL MEN ARE UN-
DERSTOOD TO BE EQUAL by
birth and by nature, so that in
reality they are equals through-
out the course of their lives ...
that he should be FREE to think
what he likes in every matter ...
In a society guided under such
rule, there is no other legal au-
thority than the consent of the
people, who, as the power is ves-
ted exclusively in them, so they
alone govern themselves ... thus
they transfer not so much the
right as the function of the gov-
ernment to themselves, and that
to be exercised in their name.
Divine rule is passed over in si-
lence . . . as if there could be
any government whose whole
cause, power and authority was
not vested in God himself. In this
manner, as we see, the State is
nothing else than a MOB as its
own master and governor.
titudo.
Release 2002/08/1 : CIA-RDP801301676R003600070077-4
1 13
 ... Hinc profecto illa nas-
cuntur: exlex uniuscujusque
conscientiae judicum . . .
legum ecclesiasticarum nulla
habetur ratio: Ecclesia .. .
jubetur nihil attingere.
... Quare ad jurisdictionem
suam trahunt matrimonia
Christianorum.
... principio clamant, disso-
ciari Ecclesiae rationes a re-
ipublicae rationibus oppor
tere.
... Ejusmodi de regenda ci-
vitate sententias ipsa natura-
hs ratio convincit, a veritate
dissidere plurimum.
. . . timor aliquis turbarum
semper impendeat.
... HUJUSMODI DOCTRI-
NAS ... Romani pontifices
... impune abire nequa-
quam passi sunt:
Sic Gregorius XVI per Ency-
clical litteras hoc initio Mi-
rari vos, die xv Augusti anno
1832, magna sententiarum
gravitate ea perculit . . . in
culte divino nullum adhibere
delectum opertere: integrum
singulis esse, quod malint,
de religione judicare: solam
cuique suam esse conscien-
tiam judicem ...
be rationibus rei sacrae rei-
que civilis distrahendis sic
idem pontifex: `Neque lacti-
pprove or Release 2002/08/2
. .. Hence -the following princi-
ples have been born: the judg-
ment of every man's conscience is
above the law ... No considera-
tion is given to ecclesiastical laws:
the church is ordered not to in-
terfere in anything.
... Thus they bring under their
own jurisdiction the marriages of
Christians.
. . . They (democrats) start out
with shouting that the affairs of
the Church must be separated
from those of the State.
... Natural reason alone proves
that such principles concerning
the government of a State are very
far removed from the truth.
a certain fear of mass-re-
actions hangs forever over our
heads
... SUCH DOCTRINES ... the
Roman Pontiffs .. '. by no means
suffered to go without condemna-
tion:
Thus Gregory XVI in his Encycli-
cal Letter `Mirari vos' of Aug. 15,
1832, denounced in very grave
terms these doctrines ... namely,
that in matters of divine worship
no preference should be shown;
that it is right for individuals to
judge matters of religion as they
see fit; that the conscience of each
man shall be his sole guide ...
The same Pontiff spoke about the
motives for separating Church
and State as follows: `Neither can
lA pproved For Release 2002/08/2
ora et religion et principatui
ominari possemus ex eorum
votis, qui Ecclesiam a regno
separari . . . Constat quippe
pertimesci ab impudentissi-
mae libertatis amatoribus
concordiam illam ...
Ex its autem pontificum
praescriptis illa omnino. in-
telligi necesse est, ortum pu-
blicae. potestas a Deo ipso,
non a multitudine repeti o-
pertere.
.. (Officia religions nullo
loco numerare), vel uno mo-
do esse in disparibus gene-
ribus affectos, nefas esse pri-
vatis hominibus, nefas civita-
tibus: immoderatam sentien-
di sensusque palam jactandi
potestatem non esse in civi-
um juribus....
Haec quidem sunt, quae de
constituendis temperandis-
que civitatibus ab Ecclesia
Catholica praecipiuntur:
... nulla per se reprehendi-
tur ex reipublicae formis, ut
quae nihil habent quod doc-
doctrinae Catholicae repug-
net...
we expect more favorable results
either for religion or for the gov-
ernment from the wishes of those
who plan to separate the Church
from the State ... It is evident
that such a concord is naturally
feared by the lovers of the most
shameless liberty ..
From these verdicts of the Popes
it must be absolutely understood
that the origin of public power is
to be sought from God himself
and not from the mob.
... that it is a crime for private
individuals and a crime for States
. . . to treat different kinds of
religions in one and the same way;
that the unabridged power of
thinking and of publicly sounding
off one's opinion is not among the
rights of the citizens....
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH;
then, teaches concerning the con-
stitution and government of States
as follows:
... None of the various forms of
governments is per se condemned
so long as they have nothing
which is repugnant to Catholic
doctrine ...
As the government of the U.S. upholds the validity of civil
,marriages contracted by Christians; as it believes in government
of the people (mob), by the people and for the people; as it
believes that men are created equal and endowed with unalien-
able rights; as it believes that government derives its power from
the governed; as it upholds freedom of religion, freedom of
CIA-RDP80B01676R0036000709g7-4
 speech and freedom of the press, American democracy is contrary
to Roman Catholic doctrine and, therefore, is condemned.
Itaque in tam difficili re-
rum cursu Catholici homines,
si nos, ut oportet, audierint,
facile videbunt quae sua cu-
jusque sint tam in opinioni-
bus quam in factis officia.
Therefore, in such a complicat-
ed course of events, Catholic men,
if, as they should, they will listen
to Us, will easily see what are
their own and the others' duties
both in matters of thought and of
action.
... Item Catholicorum homi-
num operam ex hoc tanquam
angustiore campo longius ex-
currere, ipsamque summam
rempublicam complecti ge-
neratim utile est atque ho-
nestum. Generatim eo dici-
mus quia haec praecepta
nostra gentes universas at-
tingunt.
... Quamobrem perspicuum
est, ad rempublicam adeundi
causam esse justam Catholi-
cis: non enim adeunt, neque
adire debent ob earn cau-
sam, ut probent quod est hoc
tempore in rerurn publica-
rum rationibus non hones-
tum, sed ut has ipsas ratio-
nes, quoad fieri potest, in
bonum publicum transferant
sincerum atque verum; des-
tinatum animo habentes, sa-
pientiam virtutemque Ca-
tholicae religionis, tamquam
saluberrimum succum ac
sanguinem, in omnes reipu-
blicae venas inducere.
Haud aliter actum in pri-
mis Ecclesiae aetatibus .. .
... And so, in general, it is proper
and honorable that the concern of
Catholic men should be directed
beyond this narrow field and that
it should embrace the entire field
of public administration. We say
here, in general, because these
Our precepts reach unto all na-
tions.
... Wherefore it is clear that there
is a just reason for Catholics to
seek public office; for they do not,
nor must they seek office for the
reason that they may approve that
which is morally wrong in the
present form of government, but
in order that they may change this
very form, as far as possible, for
the common good, pure and true;
keeping in mind this goal: to in-
fuse into all the veins of govern-
ment the most healthy sap and
blood, that is, the wisdom and
virtue of the Catholic religion.
This same method was em-
ployed in the early centuries of
16 Approved For Release 2002/08/
Qua ratione celeriter institu- the Church . . . By this method
to christiana non modo in Christian principles found their
privatas domos, sed in cas- way not only into private homes,
tra, in curiam, in ipsam re- but into the army, the senate and
giam invexere. into the royal palace itself.
As the early christians infiltrated the government of pagan
Rome, so Roman Catholics must infiltrate the governments of
Protestant countries, by blindly following the written instruc-
tions of the Pope and the oral instructions of their bishops.
... Jamvero his temporibus ... Now, in our times it is fitting
consentaneum est, haec ma- that we renew these examples of
jorum exempla renovari. Ca- our forefathers. Catholics indeed,
tholicos quidem, quotquot as many as are worthy of the
digni sunt eo nomine, pri- name, must before all things be
mum omnium necesse est and be willing to show themselves
amantissimos Ecclesiae filios to be, most loving sons of the
et esse et videri velle: quae Church; all things inconsistent
res nequeant cum hac laude with this honor, they must without
consistere, eas sine cuncta- hesitation reject; they must use
tione respuere: institutis po- public institutions . . . and must
pulorum . . . uti: . . . dare labor to this end that the whole
operam ut ad eam, quam State shall be transformed into
diximus, christianam simili- what we have called a christian
tudinem et formam omnis image and likeness.
respublicae traducatur.
Harum rerum adipiscen- The means to obtaining these
darum ratio constitui uno ends cannot easily be regulated
certoque modo baud com- by one and the same method, be-
mode potest cum debeat sin- cause they must fit particular
gulis locis temporibusque, places and circumstances, which
quae sunt multum inter se differ considerably from each
disparia, convenire. Nihilo- other. Nevertheless, let unity of
minus conservanda in primis planning be maintained and let
est voluntatum concordia, uniformity of action be sought
quaerendaque agendorum above all things. And both will be
similitudo. Atque optime u- best attained if all regard the
trumque impetrabitur, si orders of the Apostolic See as the
Prescripta Sedis Apostolicae rule of life and take orders from
legem vitae singuli putent, the Bishops ...
1 : CIA-RDP801301676R003600039077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/0
atque Episcopis obtempe-
rent...
As the laws of the Roman Catholic Church and of the Protes-
tant States are incompatible, may a Roman Catholic politician
follow the double standard of obeying the laws of his church
in private life and obeying the laws of his country in public
life?
Pariter non licere aliam Likewise it is not permissible
officii formam privatim se- to follow one line of duty in pri-
qui, aliam publicae, ita sci- vate and another in public, so that
licet ut Ecclesiae auctoritas the authority of the Church shall
in vita privata observetur, in be observed in private, and repu-
pnl>lica respuatur . . . diated in public ...
May Roman Catholic journalists, commentators and other
authors follow the policies of their paper, party, or country?
Omninoque istud praecep-
min teneant qui cogitationes
seas solent mandare litteris,
rnaximeque ephemeridum
auctores. In hac quidem de
rebus maximus contentione
niliil est intestinis concerta-
tionibus, vel partium studiis
reliquendum loci ... Si quid
igitur dissidiorum ante fuit,
oportet voluntaria quadam
oblivione conterere . . . et
pruecipuo quodam omnium
in Apostolicam Sedem obse-
quio redimendum.
... Hace quidem, Venerabi-
Ics Fratres, habuimus, quae
nniversis Catholici orbis gen-
tihns traderemus de civita-
tum Constitutione Christia-
na, officiisque civium singu-
lornm ...
And this Precept must be kept
unconditionally by those who are
wont to commit their thoughts to
writing, especially by those who
write for newspapers. In their
contention for the higher things
there is no room left for internal
conflicts or preferences of parties
If, therefore, there existed
some dissensions before, let them
be voluntarily done away with
and forgotten . . . and especially
by obedience to the Apostolic
See.
... These then, Venerable Breth-
ren, are the teachings which We
hold and which We hereby trans-
mit to all nations of the Catho-
lic world concerning the Christian
Constitution of States and con-
cerning the duties of their indivi-
dual citizens....
18 Approved For Release 2002/0
Datum Romae apud S. Given at Rome in the St. Peter,
Petrum die 1-novembris an- on the first day of November, in
no 1885, pontificatus nostri the year 1885, of our pontificate
anno octavo. the eighth.
Leo PP. XIII Pope Leo XIII
(Acts S. Sedis 18,161-180; Leonis XIII Acta 5, 118-150)
Presidents of the United States must take the following oath:
"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully ... preserve, protect
and defend the Constitution of the United States" (U.S. Consti-
tution, Art. 2).
No Roman Catholic is required to publicly renounce his faith
in his religious leader in Italy. Neither is a Roman Catholic
compelled to seek the presidential office of a Protestant or non-
Catholic country. However, when a Roman Catholic seeks the
presidency of a non-Catholic country with the intention of
breaking his presidential oath and of committing perjury and
treason, this man is not qualified for this highest office of the
land. These facts are self-evident, and those who present these
facts are not bigots but true patriots.
No Roman Catholic devotee, Roman Catholic sympathizer, or
non-Catholic secretly committed to Rome, is fit and worthy of the
American presidency unless he can conscientiously subscribe to
the following declaration:
WHEREAS the "Christian Constitution" of the Roman Cath-
olic Church (Bull "Immortale Dei") condemns the most funda-
mental laws of the American Constitution, and declares heretical
those democratic principles which are most highly revered by the
American people; and
WHEREAS the same Roman Constitution holds it unlawful
for a candidate of the Roman Catholic faith to protect and
defend in public life laws and principles which are contrary to
papal laws and principles;
I hereby solemnly swear, without any mental reservation, that
I denounce as heretical and subversive all papal doctrines, pre-
CIA-RDP80B01676R003600N0077-4
 pproved For Release 2002/08
cepts and directives which are repugnant to the laws and demo-
cratic principles of our American Constitution and our American
institutions.
CREED OF ANY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
As every loyal American citizen subscribes to the following
American principles, assuredly a worthy candidate for the Ameri-
can presidency could have no objection to subscribing to the
following declarations:
1. I believe in the United States of America as a government of
the people, by the people, for the people; and I do solemnly
swear that I owe no allegiance to any person or organization
which opposes this American principle and which seeks to cor-
rupt the minds of our citizens by defining democracy as the rule
by the mob.
2. I believe that the just power of the American government is
derived from the consent of the governed, i.e., the American
people, and that its authority is not vested in, not subordinate
to, nor dependent upon the consent and divine jurisdiction as-
sumed by any religious leader, foreign or domestic.
3. I believe this truth to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal; and I reject as heretical and subversive the theory that
certain privileged men and classes are predestined by birth, by
religion or by ordination to rule dictatorially over the secular
and civil affairs of their fellow citizens.
4. I believe that liberty is one of the certain unalienable rights
of men; and I reject as untrue the medieval concept that man by
nature is subject to masters and rulers in whose election or
elevation he had no voice, direct or indirect. I do solemnly swear
that I owe no allegiance to any person or organization which
denies that this nation was conceived in liberty.
5. I believe in freedom of religion; and I disown allegiance to
any leader or organization which holds that man is not free to
follow his own conscience and to worship God as he sees fit.
6. I believe in the unabridged freedom of speech and of the
press; and I disown allegiance to any person or group which
ridicules this American principle by calling it "unbridled liberty",
and which denies that this particular freedom is among the rights
20 Approved For Release 2002/08
7. I believe in separation of Church and State; and I disown al-
legiance to any religious leader who dares to anathematize and
excommunicate his subjects for adherence to this American
principle.
8. I believe that churches and people of all faiths have equal
rights and that Congress shall make no law respecting an estab.
lishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
and I do solemnly swear that I owe no allegiance to any person
or organization which rejects the Bill of Rights and which holds
that the Roman Catholic faith must be made the state religion of
all nations, that it must receive preference over all other religions
even when in the minority, and that it is a crime for private
citizens and for States to treat non-Catholic religions on an equal
basis.
9. I believe that the Protestant, Greek Orthodox, Roman Cath-
olic, Jewish and other faiths are to be treated equal according
to the Constitution of my country; and I promise that, if elected,
I will refuse to give diplomatic and political preference to any
particular religious ruler by appointing an American ambassa-
dor to him, by concluding a concordate with him, or by making
any secret commitments to him or to his American representa-
tives.
10. I believe that the American laws, constitutions and the
authority vested by the people in the President are supreme, and
not subordinate to foreign laws or a foreign constitution; and I
solemnly swear that I do not owe allegiance to any foreign ruler
or organization which holds that our Constitution is unconstitu-
tional and not binding in conscience wherever it is contrary to
ecclesiastical laws and pontifical decrees.
11. I believe that the marriages of American citizens performed
by the Justice of the Peace or before an authorized minister are
valid, regardless of the faith wherein the parties happened to be
baptized; and I disown allegiance to any person or organization
which holds that the State may not and cannot join in matrimony
certain citizens of certain faiths, and which holds that civil
marriages of certain parties are invalid and that the offspring
thereof is illegitimate.
21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600020077-4
 12. I believe that one is not faithful to his oath of office in case
one seeks the office of the President for the purpose of destroying
the democratic principles laid down by our Constitution; and 1
do solemnly swear that I do not owe allegiance to any person
or organization which demands its members to infiltrate the
branches of government for the direct purpose of overthrowing
our democratic form of government and supplanting it by a
foreign, religious, or fascist rule.
BULL "LIBERTAS PRAESTANTISSIMUM"
The same Pope Leo XIII (d. 1903) condemned our American
form of government on many other occasions. In his Encyclical
"Libertas praestantissimum" (June 20, 1888) he declared the
American principle of `Separation of Church and State' a "perni-
cious maxim", and he concluded:
"From what has been said, it follows that it is in no way lawful
to demand, to defend, or to grant promiscuous freedom of
thought, of speech, of writing, or of religion, as if they were so
many rights which nature had given to man."
As a Roman Catholic is forbidden to "defend" the very first,
article of the Bill of Rights, it follows that he cannot take the
oath of office to "defend the Constitution" without committing
perjury.
At this point we may warn our reader not to be misled by the
jesuitical adjective `promiscuous'. Jesuit authors are known
for employing certain adjectives which they want the reader to
interpret as being derogative, but which, in case of criticism,
can be falsely explained as qualifying. For example, Jesuits will
seldom or never denounce "communism pure and simple, but
always attack "atheistic communism 7', just in case communism
would be victorious. So they speak of promiscuous, unbridled,
unabridged and most shameless liberty, while clearly condemning
all forms of democratic freedom.
THE JESUITS
The Jesuit Order was founded after the Reformation under
g
1550) for the direct purpose of yie
l III (d
P~
.
pope Pau
Protestantism. As the early ChrisA -cWreWV ePjgg'62/08/
the upper classes of pagan Rome, so the Jesuits were to secretly
infiltrate the governments, seminaries, society and political
groups in Protestant countries. Contrary to the early Christians,
the Jesuits were allowed to use any means to obtain their ends,
such as spying, bribery, prostitution, blackmail, assassination,
revolution and war. Jesuitry is a Spanish invention with all the
fanatic intolerance and absolute disregard for human rights of
the Spanish Inquisition.
The most dangerous of all Jesuits are the `lay-jesuits' or secret
'externs' who may hide their real identity by posing as non-
Catholics or even as atheists (about which later). As early as
Dec. 1, 1581, Edmund Campion, a British Jesuit disguised as
a jewelry salesman, was hanged at Tyburn as a traitor for plan-
ning the assassination of Queen Elizabeth and for advocating
the overthrowing of her legal government by force. Dr. Joseph
McCabe, an ex-priest, relates how a disguised Jesuit taught for
years at a Lutheran College in Sweden (Truth about the Catholic
Church; Girard, 1926, p. 52). The Jesuits became such masters
of deceit, intrigue, greed and unscrupulousness that they
began to employ the same methods in Catholic countries and
became a menace to the papacy itself. Pope Clement XIV de-
creed that the Jesuit Order must be suppressed, abrogated,
abolished, "destroyed and extinguished for ever." (Bull of
Suppression, "Dominus ac Redemptor," July 21, 1773). The
Jesuits, however, continued to function in Russia and the United
States, and went underground in other countries.
Besides Protestantism, Rome was confronted with new enemies
within its own ranks: liberalism and democracy. In the days of
Voltaire (d. 1778), Thomas Paine (d. 1809), etc., the Vatican
was convinced that the papacy was at its end. With horror Rome
heard of the American Declaration of Independence (1776) and
the Bill of Rights (1791). The National Convention of France
(1792) ended the reign of the royal House of Bourbon and
created the First French Republic. Even Napoleon treated Pope
Pius VI (d. 1800) with total contempt. The democratic wave
which swept over two continents was considered far more dan-
gerous to papal supremacy than protestantism. Consequently,
Pope Pius VII (Aug. 7, 1814) was forced to call the dreaded
Jesuits back in power.
In 1814 the Jesuits again donned their clerical garb in those
1 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
23
 pproved For Release 2002/08/21 :
countries where they were not banned by civil law, but they kept
their huge army of underground members in civilian clothes.
Beginning with the reign of Pope Pius IX (1846-1878) the
Jesuits were in complete and permanent control of the papacy, or
rather they abolished it. Since the middle of the 19th century
the pope is nothing but a figure head, completely divorced from
the administration of his church, exclusively occupied with
official celebrations, shaking hands with dignitaries, blessing
the throngs of pilgrims, a dummy which only speaks when the
Jesuits pull the strings, and with no more political power than
the Queen of England. The first completely Jesuit-dominated and
Jesuit-guarded prisoner of the Vatican, Pope Pius IX, published
some 30 papal Bulls and Encyclicals, all of which were written by
the Jesuits. Every one of these papal writings is an attack
against both Protestant and democratic principles. To assure
themselves of totalitarian powers, the Jesuits declared their first
dummy pope "infallible", "supreme", and above any ecumenical
council of bishops (Vatican Council, Bull "Pastor aeternus", July
18,1870). After the Bull "Pastor aeternus" the "Syllabus of Er-
rors" is the most renowned of the alleged infallible writings of
Pope Pius IX.
24pproved For Release 2002/08/21
CIA-RDP80B0167
SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
(Acta et Decreta Concilii Vaticani, Freiburg, 1871)
SYLLABUS ERRORUM of Pope Pius IX, Dec. 8,1864
The "Syllabus", according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, is
"the name given to two series of propositions containing modern
religious errors condemned respectively by Pius IX (1864) and
Pius X (1907)" (C.E. 14, 368). The official title explains that
the contents of the Syllabus is nothing new, but a combination of
the chief errors already condemned in numerous other papal
writings. The real purpose of the Bull is an attempt to ridicule
Democratic Constitutions, or "to bring together under the form
of a Constitution the chief errors of the time and to condemn
them" (C.E. 14, 368). This papal ridicule of our Constitution
is "infallible", because "the binding force of the condemnation in
regard to all the propositions is beyond doubt ... All Catholics,
therefore, are bound to accept the Syllabus" (C.E. 14, 369).
The Syllabus contains 80 articles, theses or propositions, pop-
ularly held by non-Catholics. Contrary to other Bulls, the Jesuits
chose the positive form of these alleged heresies in order to
phrase the democratic views in a more awkward manner. Thus
the Syllabus condemns as error the articles or propositions quo-
ted, and all Roman Catholics are bound under pain of excommun-
ication to hold the opposite as of true faith and morals.
Pope Pius IX, like all Jesuit-appointed popes, has been de-
scribed as a saintly man, but his former classmates knew better
and have publicly stated otherwise. As modern popes are actual-
ly prisoners of the Vatican and have their private lives shielded
far better than our secular rulers, we have no official records of
his immorality, as we have of nearly all medieval popes. How-
ever, a man may be judged by his friends. His close friend and
papal Secretary, Cardinal Antonelli, was so immoral that he was
feared throughout Italy. Antonelli, generally believed to have
been a secret Jesuit, denied that he ever had been ordained a
priest. This 'unordained' Cardinal left an estate of $20,000,000
which his illegitimate daughter, Countess Lambertini, publicly
claimed as her legal inheritance. His life story can be found in
the Encyclopedia Britannica, though a jesuitical pen re-edited
its contents in 1928.
Whether Pope Pius was a pious or impious man is of little
CIA-RDP80B0l 676R003600070077-4
25
 importance. His Syllabus of Errors is the work of Jesuits and
its teachings are still infallibly upheld by the Jesuits of today.
A large portion of the Syllabus was compiled by American
Jesuits, immediately after Lincoln's Gettysburg Address (Nov.
19, 1863), paving the way for his assassination (1865). We do
not have the space to comment on all of its articles, but we will
select a few of the most important ones, beginning with article
twelve. Therefore condemned and excommunicated is anyone
who holds that:
12. Apostolicac Sedis, Roma- 12. The decrees of the Roman
narumque Congregationum Congregations impede the free
decreta liberum scientiae progress of science.
progressum impediunt.
The truth of this condemned proposition can be demonstrated
by this example. In 1616 Pope Paul V and the Roman Congrega-
tion of the Index condemned the theory of Copernicus (Mirbt,
No. 510), and Pope Paul V, Pope Urban VIII and the Roman
Inquisition (1632) condemned the scientist Galileo for holding
that the earth moves (Mirbt, No. 515), a scientific fact known
by every seven year old child of this space age. Galileo was
thrown in a dungeon and forced to retract his `heresies'. Till
the 19th century Catholics were forbidden to read his books.
Yet, if a Roman Catholic should hold today that these papal
decrees impeded the progress of science, he is excommunicated.
Poverty and illiteracy are the characteristics of all Roman Catho-
lic countries. Rome now tries to remedy her shortage of scien-
tists by rewriting our text-books. The great Pasteur, for example,
was baptized as a child but left the Roman Church as a student
and died outside her pale. Yet, in 1928 a jesuitical pen rewrote
his life in the Encyclopedia Britannica and added that he was
a "devout Catholic".
15. Liberum cuique homini 15. Every man is free to embrace
est earn amplecti ac profiteri and profess that religious faith
religionem, quam rationis lu- which, guided by the light of rea-
mine quis ductus veram pu- son, he shall believe to be true.
taverit.
Contrary to our Constitution, this Roman Constitution con-
demns freedom of religion. "No Catholic can in conscience de-
26Approved For Release 2002/08/2
fend such an idea of freedom of religious worship. For, according
to Catholic principles, the only religion that has a genuine right
to exist is the Catholic religion" (Ecclesiastical Review, Oct.,
1943). "The Catholic Church ... must demand the right of free-
dom for herself alone, because such a right can only be possessed
by truth, never by error" (Civilta Cattolica, April, 1948, Italian
Jesuit monthly.) Rome does not only preach, but practices this
medieval intolerance wherever it is in power. In Catholic Spain
prostitution is publicly approved and supervised, but public
Protestantism is illegal. Though the U. S. has poured billions
of Protestant dollars into Spain under various pretexts, no Pro-
testant may publicly worship God. "Open-air ceremonies or
demonstrations other than those of the Catholic religion, shall
not be tolerated" (Spanish Charter of July 17, 1945, Art. 6 ).
This same prohibition of non-Catholic religious ceremonies is
to be introduced in all countries. Monsignor John A. Ryan,
professor of the Catholic University in Washington; D.C., pre-
tends to express a very liberal view about Protestant ceremonies
when he writes: "If these are carried on within the family, or
in such inconspicuous manner as to be an occasion neither of
scandal nor of perversion to the faithful, they may be properly
tolerated by the State" (John A. Ryan, The State and the
Church; New York, Macmillan, 1922, p. 35).
The very first Latin Father of the Church, .Bishop Tertullian,
wrote at the beginning of the third century: "It is a fundamental
human right, a privilege of nature, that every man should wor-
ship according to his convictions. It is certainly no part of religion
to spread itself by force. It must be embraced freely, and not be
imposed" (Migne, P. L. vol. 1, p. 777). Today, Rome not only
claims that her religion has the sole right to exist on this earth,
but she holds that she has the divine right to use physical force,
torture and the death penalty to compel non-Catholics to em-
brace her religion. Though this subject belongs rightfully under
Article 24, we will briefly comment on it here.
Pope Urban II (d. 1099) was the first pope to approve the
murder of heretics (Migne, P. L. 151, 394). Pope Innocent III
(1215) was the first to grant indulgences to those who kill
heretics, and more than one million Western Europeans were
thus murdered during his reign (Mansi 22, 982). St. Thomas
Aquinas (d. 1274) was the first Roman Catholic theologian to
CIA-RDP801301676R003600070f77-4
 approve the murder of heretics: "They deserve . . . to be shut
off from this world by death. For it is a much more serious
matter to corrupt faith ... than to counterfeit money ... With
much more justice the heretics, immediately upon conviction,
are not only to be excommunicated, but also to be put to death"
(Summa Theol. II, II, qu. 11). Catechisms of Roman Catholic
countries teach children that Rome has the right to murder
Protestants and other heretics: "Question. What are the other
penalties which the Church applies to the crime of heresy?
Answer. Confiscation of goods, imprisonment, exile and death"
(Catechisme Catholique Romain de St. Pie V. Bruxelles, 1827,
p. 256). All professors of Roman Catholic seminaries teach till
this day that Rome has the right to murder heretics. Cardinal
Lepicier, professor at the Roman University of De Propaganda
Fide, has written a work of 25 volumes on Dogmatics and has
an article on "The Church has the right to condemn heretics to
death," which follows the Rule of St. Benedict when it says:
"It is a wholesome and praiseworthy thing to put a person to
death for the good of the community... Perhaps this doctrine will
seem too drastic for this age ... When one considers what harm
it does to society, one will easily understand that, if traitors or
murderers are justly condemned to die, those who publicly
undermine the Catholic faith deserve more rightfully to be put
to death ... As proof of our argument we have the 24th con-
demned proposition of the SYLLABUS of Pius IX: `The Church
has not the right to use force" (Lepicier, De stabilitate et pro-
gressu Dogmatis, part 2, art. 6, p. 175). The Catholic Encyclo-
pedia teaches the same (C. E. 14, 768-769). American bishops
teach the same. The Diocese of Brooklyn, N. Y. teaches: "Heresy
is an awful crime . . . If the State has the right to punish
treason with death ...the Church ... has the right and power
to take means to safeguard its eistence" (Brooklyn Tablet,
Nov. 5, 1938). If Rome has the power and right to murder any
heretic, she has the right to murder an American president who
is not of her faith. Roman Catholics who hold that Rome may
not interfere with the individual belief of free citizens, and
does not have the right to murder non-Catholics, are excom-
municated, and become `heretics' themselves, subject to death.
16. Homirres in cujusvis re- 16. Men can find the way of eter-
28 Approved For Release 2002/08/;
ligionis cultu viam aeternae
salutis reperire aeternamque
salutem' assequi possunt.
17. Saltem bene sperandum
est de aeterna illorum omni-
um salute, qui in vera Chris-
ti Ecclesia nequaquam ver-
santur.
18. Protestantismum non ali-
ud est quam diversa verae
ejusdem Christianae religio-
nis forma, in qua aeque ac in
Ecclesia Catholica Deo pla-
cere datum est.
nal salvation and can obtain eter-
nal salvation in any kind of reli-
gion.
17. We may entertain at least a
well-founded hope of the eternal
salvation of all those who do not
belong to the true Church of
Christ.
18. Protestantism is nothing more
than another form of the same
true Christian religion, in which
it is possible to be equally pleas-
ing to God as in the Catholic
Church.
In another Bull the same pope explains that there is no sal-
vation for Roman Catholics either, unless they believe that the
Protestants have no salvation: "We must hold as of faith that
outside of the apostolic Roman Church there is no salvation;
Tenendum quippe ex fide est, extra apostolicam Romanam
Ecclesiam salvum fieri neminem posse" (Singulari quadam,'
Dec. 9, 1854). Dozens of other Bulls contain the same dogma.
Thus American Roman Catholics must hold that 80 per cent
of the American citizens are heading for hell. The recent Boston
incident (Father Feeney, S.J.) is an old Jesuit trick and huge
deception. It does not have the infallible sanction of Rome.
Besides, the term "invincible ignorance" implies total and per-
manent insanity, or complete impossibility of learning the truth.
Simple ignorance is no excuse. Hence the term does not apply
to American citizens. Even a `chance' or "well-founded hope"
must be ruled out. Those who dare to maintain that some well-
minded Protestants may obtain salvation are referred to as
"pests" (pestes), and Art. 21 anathematizes those who deny that
"the religion of the Catholic Church is the only true religion."
19. Ecclesia non est vera 19. The (Roman) Church is not
perfectaque societas plane a true, perfect and entirely inde-
libera, nec pullet suis pro- pendent society, nor does she en-
priis et constantibus juribus joy specific and perpetual rights
sibi a divino suo fundatore conferred upon her by her Divine
1 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600039077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : C
collatis, sed civilis potestatis Founder, but it belongs to the
est definire quae sint Eccle- civil power to define what are the
siae jura exercere queat. rights and limits within which the
Church may exercise her rights.-
Many other papal Bulls contain the same dogma; the State is
said to have no other rights than those delegated to her by the
Church.
22. Obligatio, qua Catholici 22. The obligation which binds
magistri et scriptores omni- Catholic TEACHERS AND AU-
no adstringuntur, coarctatur THORS applies only to those
in its tantum, quae ab infal- things which are proclaimed by
libili Ecclesiae judicio veluti the infallible judgment of the
fidei dogmata ab omnibus Church as dogmas of faith and as
credenda proponuntur. , binding to all.
The first professions to be organized by Rome as secret propa-
ganda and pressure groups were the school teachers, journalists
and authors of books. Once they were organized and had taken
their oath of fidelity, they were informed that their oath not
only bound them under pain of hell to set forth the religious
doctrines of Rome, but also bound them to further the political
aims of Rome.
Today, nearly all professional groups have been organized as
Catholic pressure groups. In Protestant Holland, for example,
we not only find buildings with big signs, reading: "Roman
Catholic Daily", "Roman Catholic Farmers' Loan Bank", "Roman
Catholic Labor Party", etc., but we find that every group, in-
cluding the "Roman Catholic Goat Breeding Association", has
been organized, and that Roman Catholics are forbidden under
pain of hell to join a neutral (non-Catholic) organization or to
read any neutral newspaper. Here in the U. S. we have been
acquainted with such organizations as the Knights of Columbus,
Holy Name Society, League of Decency, Catholic Men Society,
Catholic Veterans, Catholic police and firemen, etc., but now
find that Catholic doctors, Catholic druggists, Catholic lawyers,
Catholic bankers, etc., including Roman Catholic Television
Camera Operators, have been organized throughout our land,
seeking segregation in every field. The Catholic Almanac and
Directory list the following Catholic organizations:
4 proved For Release 2002/08/21
Association of Catholic Trade Unionists (A.C.T.U.)
Catholic Labor Institute (with 2 offices in Los Angeles)
Catholic Petroleum Guild (for employees of oil companies)
Catholic Institute of the Food Industry
Guild of Catholic executives and employees of Insurance Companies
Guild of Catholic executives in the Liquor, Beer & Wine Industry
Guild for Catholic Airline employees
Guild for Catholic Railroad employees
St. Gabriel's Guild for Postal and Federal employees
All large city, county, state and federal offices have Catholic Action groups
organized into guilds:
City Police Dept.-Communion Breakfast Club
City Fire Dept.-Holy Name Society
Water, Gas & Electricity-Catholic Guilds
Telephone Company-Catholic Guilds
Dept. of Welfare; Dept. of Hospitals; Dept. of Finance; Office of the
Comptroller; Civil Service; etc.
Catholic Institute of the Press (for journalists)
Catholic Newsmen's Association (for newspaper employees)
All city papers have their Catholic Guilds which are incorporated into
Catholic Press Councils which again take orders from the Catholic Press
Department in Washington.
National League of Decency (to censor movies, books, etc.)
Catholic Broadcasters Associations (throughout the States)
Catholic Actors' Guild of America
Catholic Writers' Guild
Catholic Apostolate of Radio, T.V. and Advertising (organized by Irene
Dunne under the cloak of Communion Breakfasts)
Guilds of Catholic Physicians (organized into a federation like the AMA)
Guild of Catholic Psychiatrists
St. Apollonia Guild of Catholic Dentists
St. Cosmos & Damian Society for Catholic Pharmacists
Druggists' Guild of St. James (to prevent sale of contraceptives)
Catholic Court Attaches Guild for Judges
St. Thomas More Guilds for Catholic Lawyers
Catholic Teachers Association
Catholic Accountants Guilds (in 600 cities)
Catholic Hospital Association of the U.S.A.
All these pressure groups receive free publicity from our news-
papers:
"A television camera will be solemnly blessed at St. Joseph's
(by) ... Msgr. John J. Devlin. Archdiocesan head of motion
pictures activities ...The symbolic ceremony (will be) attended
by an assembly of TV stars, authors, producers, directors and
CIA-RDP80BOl 676R003600070077-4
 technicians . . . The special ceremonies will honor St. Clare,
newly appointed patroness of TV" (L.A. Mirror-News, 8-9-58).
"His Eminence James Francis Cardinal McIntyre will preside
at the traditional Red Mass to be sung at 1 p.m. Aug. 24 in St.
Vincent's Church ... in conjunction with the 81st annual meet-
ing of the American Bar Association here" (L. A. Mirror-News,
8-16-58).
"The Sts. Cosmos and Damian Society, an association of Catho-
lic pharmacists, will attend Mass at 9 a.m. tomorrow in St.
Vincent's Church (L.A. Mirror-News, 8-16-58).
"Doug Bridges of Paramount Pictures yesterday was unani-
mously elected ... as president of the Catholic Press Council
of Southern California. The election occurred at a communion
breakfast in Pucci's, Encino. Others elected ... Cornelio Baca
of the Alhambra Post-Advocate, treasurer, and Jack O'Mara of
KTTV, secretary. Named to the executive committee were Dave
Bongard of the Herald Express; Jack Granara of Universal
International Studios; Phil Hanna, public relations, and Chuck
Johnson, sports editor of Tidings" (L.A. Mirror-News, 2-16-59).
"More than 2,000 Catholic members of the Motion Picture
and Television Industry attended a Solemn Pontifical Mass
at the Church of the Blessed Sacrament in Hollywood yesterday"
(L.A. Mirror-News, 2-8-60).
The members, or at least the leaders, of nearly all these Cath-
olic organizations take oath or solemnly promise that they
will defend the Catholic cause in all phases of life. In spite of
the American practice of disqualifying jury members who are
prejudiced, and contrary to the oath of office taken by the
judges of our courts, the Pope, as reported in all our newspapers,
instructed Roman Catholic judges "that in any case involving
an interest of the Roman Church the judge is under moral com-
pulsion, as a Catholic, to rule in the church's favor." It is, there-
fore, a general practice in the U. S., where there is a rotation
of judges, to postpone cases of Roman Catholics till a Roman
Catholic judge takes the bench. Roman Catholic lawyers are
forbidden to handle separation and divorce cases without first
consulting the ecclesiastical court and following the orders of
their diocese. For example, the 50 Roman Catholic lawyers who
are members of the St. Thomas More Society of Allegheny
County, Pa. are bound by the Diocesan Statute which reads:
A proved For Release 2002/08/21
"Following a valid marriage, it is strictly forbidden for any
Catholic, whether as plaintiff or as attorney, to approach the
civil courts to obtain a separation, divorce or annulment, with-
out prior approval of the Bishop." Under the date line, Pitts-
burgh, Pa., July 5, 1958, the newspapers reported: "Roman
Catholic lawyers in the Pittsburgh Diocese were reminded here
of a diocesan ruling under which they must consult with the
chancery before handling divorce cases." Monsignor Shinar of
the chancery office explained to newsmen: "We maintain that an
attorney is not competent to judge the existence or non-existence
of the sacred contract of marriage" (L. A. Mirror-News, 7-5-58).
There are many other instances wherein Catholic judges
have violated their oath of office. For example in the matter of
eugenic sterilization, which is practised in 27 States but forbidden
.by Rome, Catholic judges are forbidden to enforce these laws
which conflict with Roman canon laws. There are numerous
cases.where Roman Catholic judges have confined non-Catholic
girls to Roman Catholic institutions, clearly following the in-
structions of their bishops. When officials of American courts
have no respect for American law; when they commit perjury
by breaking their oath of office; when they refuse to believe
in equality and justice for all; when they have a dual allegiance
or citizenship, Roman and American, and believe that Roman
law has priority over American law, these men are as subver-
sive as any other foreign agents who spit on our flag and trample
on our Constitution. The question now arises: should we vote
such men into office, even into the highest office of the land;
and are we guilty of intolerance when we cast our free vote
for a man whom we believe to be more dedicated to our country?
Like Catholic judges, Catholic doctors must also give priority
to Roman rules, even when contrary to medical ethics. For exam-
ple, therapeutic abortion to save the life of a mother is legal in
48 States, but forbidden by Roman canon law. When the
life of a non-Catholic mother could be saved by abortion, with-
out which both mother and child would die, the doctor of a
Catholic hospital may not even inform the mother (and give her
a chance to go to another hospital) but must let her die in ig-
norance. When a doctor not only refuses to perform a legal
operation to save the life of his fellow-citizen, but refuses to
inform her that any other doctor could save her life
d tL_
an
 willfully orphans her other children, he is a criminal. Rome
tries to force her medieval theology on public and county hos-
pitals as well. Protestant patients in New York's public hospitals
were refused medical therapeutic information by doctors and
county health officials who obviously followed orders of the
Roman hierarchy. Should a loyal American citizen vote such
Catholic doctors into public office; and if he wishes to cast his
free vote for a more loyal citizen, is he intolerant?
Catholic teachers have been organized not only to brainwash
parochial school children, but to bring the Public School under
Roman Catholic control, as we shall see under Article 45. Every
other profession has been organized to overthrow our democratic
heritage and to make our land subject to Roman Catholic rule.
By pressure, threats, boycott and censorship they have gained
control over most of our newspapers, radio, television and movie
industries. For example, when a Bishop warns a certain newspa-
per under penalty of boycott to suppress all scandal of the
Roman clergy (rape, theft, adultery, drunkeness, etc.), when
Roman Catholic businessmen and Roman Catholic news agencies
demand front page publicity of Catholic news under threat of
taking their advertisements elsewhere, our newspapers will
oblige for purely financial reasons. As there are no Protestant
pressure groups we have a situation wherein a minority can
have the picture of their pope almost daily on our front pages
while the activities of the greatest Protestant leaders are sup-
pressed; occasional scandals of the Protestant clergy are head-
lined, while the gross immorality of the Roman clergy is shielded.
Consequently, the unsuspecting public receives the false im-
pression that the Roman church is far more decent than the
Protestant churches.
Many non-Catholic owners of newspapers, knowing that they
are betraying their own people and their own religion, try to
bluff their way out by flatly denying that Rome uses pressure
on them. There are hundreds of cases of censorship, boycott
and blackmail on file. They could not have already forgotten
the Martin Luther film. They still must remember the banning
of "The Nation" not only from Catholic libraries, but from the
Public Schools of New York City, because Paul Blanshard had
written a series of factual articles on Roman Catholicism (June,
1948). The Newark, N. J. Boar Approducation banned ved For Relea ee 2Nation
002/08/21
34
as early as Jan., 1948. On Sept. 11, 1944, the San Francisco~News
innocently reported the story of the arrest of a Roman Catholic
priest and his woman companion for drunken driving. Though
the priest pleaded guilty and paid a fine of $250, Archbishop
Mitty of San Francisco was more outraged against the news-
paper than against the priest. As fully reported in Time Maga-
zine, the bishop organized the entire clergy and laity to boycott
the News and instructed businessmen to withdraw their adver-
tisements "until the News recognized the well-known weight of
the Church" (Time, Oct. 23,1944, p. 59).
As democracy cannot function without a free press, it is a
crime to suppress the news or to force others to suppress it.
Rome has founded a League of Decency which under the
cloak of religion and of decency tries to control the movie in-
dustry by its censorship, while Protestants regard such suppres-
sion of freedom unconstitutional. Since Hollywood is only inter-
ested in profits and it knows that the Roman League will con-
demn and boycott any movie which offends Catholic doctrine,
such as birth control, or anything derogatory and detrimental
to Catholic prestige, our movies are favoring Romanism over
Protestantism. Hollywood, for example, places Peter in Rome,
which the greatest historians have been unable to accomplish.
Ridiculous marriage scenes always have a Protestant minister
officiating, while solemn marriages are performed by a priest.
All these things, though they may seem trivial to some, have not
only great propaganda value, but have pushed Roman Catholic
actors, singers and entertainers into the industry, and this again
gave Rome the power to push the directors and even the owners
out of the industry.
At first, Roman Catholics had little chance of becoming top
stars unless they had British names, or changed their names,
and kept their religious preference to themselves. Slowly the
number of Catholic stars increased: Fred Allen (Sullivan),
Barbara Stanwyck (Ruby Stevens), Ethel Barrymore, Loretta
Young, Irene Dunne, Ann Blyth, Jimmy Durante, Rudy Vallee,
Bing Crosby, Bob Crosby, Gregory Peck, Lawrence Welk, Gi-
selle McKenzie, Jeanne Crain, Kim Novak, etc. etc. The Irish
were the first to invade the industry: Arthur Godfrey, Dennis
Day, Grace Kelly, Pat O'Brien, Margaret O'Brien, Maureen
O'Sullivan, Dorothy Malone, Lucille Ball, etc. etc. They were
CIA-RDP80BOl676R00360007007 -4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : IA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
soon followed by the Italians: Don Ameche, Lou Costello,
Perry Como, Frank Sinatra, Tony Martin, Dean Martin, Julius
La Rosa, Sal Mineo, Vic Damone, Pier Angeli, Anna Maria
Alberghetti, Rossano Brazzi, etc. etc. Rome is not only trying
to organize these stars into a Catholic union, but it tries to or-
ganize everyone connected with the industry to the last camera-
man. Such undercover designs to monopolize an industry which
controls public opinion is a danger to a free society.
Roman Catholic mayors, governors, congressmen and senators
are constantly used to further the political aims of Rome.
Through the gangster element within the Roman church a secret
Catholic party was set up to gain control of our cities. Tom
Prendergast, a gangster who went to Mass every day, became
the political czar of Kansas City. Mayor Jimmy Walker promoted
the Catholic cause in New York City. James Michael Curley,
mayor and political boss of Boston and governor of Massachu-
setts, served five months at a Federal institution until pardoned
by President Truman in 1950. He has a son who is a Jesuit.
Mayor Ed Kelly of Chicago; Ed J. Flynn, democratic boss of the
Bronx, N. Y.; Boss Mayor 'I-am-the-law' Frank Hague of Jersey
City, N. J. and many other `bosses' have made the United States
a Roman province. Frank Hague, for example, had the full
backing of the Catholic hierarchy and kept his enemies, like John
R. Longo, in jail on trumped-up charges. When Longo finally
managed to regain his freedom, he received a wire from former
Governor Edison which read: "Full and complete exoneration
is yours after five long years of persecution ... suffered under
the pernicious political machine which for too many years has
survived by imposing a dictatorship of fear and reprisal upon the
people of Jersey City"(N. Y. Times, Feb. 18,1948).
The days of these democratic bosses are over for no other
reason than that they are no longer needed. Today, Rome seems
to obtain her ends through the labor unions. Governor Brown
of California - whose son is studying to be a Jesuit - defeated
Knowland in the 1958 election by more than a million votes,
as if the latter had been the greatest bum in the history of the
U. S. Senate.
Getting back to the "dictatorship of fear and reprisal" of the
old democratic bosses, the first thing it imposed on a city was
a Roman Catholic police force. This police force controlled and
still controls the Catholic underworld and collects from it mil-
lions of dollars to perpetuate itself in office. It is not a coinci-
dence that in Chicago, a city of prostitutes, bookmakers and gang-
sters, the Catholic bishop receives car license plate no. 1 to indi-
cate that he is the first citizen of that city. Underworld slayings,
though often forecast by our newspapers, are never solved by
such police departments. Illegal gambling is exhibited publicly
in the streets. Sometimes the Catholic police and the Catholic
underworld clash when the first tries to extort too much money
from the latter. "Three hundred of the city's biggest bookies,"
reported the New York papers, "shut down their telephone
services and went on strike against the exorbitant shakedowns
by police officials" (N. Y. Daily News, Feb. 7, 1947). Statistics
show that in that year (1947) New York City was 79% non-
Catholic, but its police force was 62.8% Catholic, while the
higher-ups in that department were 80% Catholic. Once it is in
control of a city, this gangster element makes the Catholic
bishop its first citizen. It is an ordinary thing in New York to
find 100 policemen at the steps of St. Patrick's during a society
wedding or funeral, while not a single one at the door of Rocke-
feller Center. The cathedral holds 2,000 people, the center
70,000.
Not only cities, but Protestant towns and counties often
have Roman Catholic chiefs and sheriffs. In places where mayors
are elected and the chief of police appointed, the Romanists
usually make a deal with the Protestant candidates and promise
the Catholic vote if one of their men will be appointed as chief.
In certain fields the chief of police has more power than a mayor
and even more power than the President of the United States.
It is a fact that every citizen and newspaper dares to attack the
policies of the President and call him names, but no local citizen
or local paper dares to attack the chief of police, unless City Hall
and the papers and the public attempt to oust the chief in a
united drive. Because of their power, these Catholic chiefs can
perpetuate themselves in office and make a farce out of democ-
racy. Like the bishops, who maintain a file of all scandals of
their priests in order to keep them under subjection, most of our
police departments in our bigger cities maintain files of men who
have no police records but are potential, political opponents.
Like the Jesuits, who own the state-controlled houses of prosti-
proved For Release 2002/08/21
 pproved For Release 2002/08/21 : (IA-RDP80B01676R003600
tution in Spain and secretly register their patrons, many of our
police departments have and are still controlling our houses of
prostitution and gambling establishments, and are using hundreds
of detectives to trail political opponents. Wiretapping and bug-
ging are the order of the day. Private detectives, invariably "ex-
police officers" or "bad Catholics", have access, direct or indirect,
to all police files and can blackmail almost any citizen. We have
also a situation in Washington where only a handful of senators
are still able to express their personal views without fearing
the hand of blackmailers.
Our presidential candidates crawl on their knees before Car-
dinal Spellman imploring the Catholic vote. The one who will
promise the most seems to get the vote. As Republicans and Dem-
ocrats are about equal in strength and as presidents are elected to
office often by less than one million votes, almost any minority
can swing the election one way or the other. This may explain
why overconfident Protestant Mr. Dewey lost the election, and
why Protestant Mr. Truman, contrary to the Constitution and
contrary to the wishes of 100 million of his fellowmen, sought
to appoint an American ambassador to the Vatican.
Government by blackmail, character assassination and im-
prisonment are the typical methods employed by international
jesuitry. Because modern political issues are so complex, it is
not always easy to prove where the Jesuits are at work. Under
the pretext of humanitarianism the New York Lincoln Square
Slum Clearance Project was approved on Oct. 2, 1957, comprising
320,230 square feet at the price of $16 per square foot. Soon
after the project's approval the public found out about a deal
which amounted to an indirect grant of $3,500,000 to the Jesuit
University of Fordham and another indirect subsidy of public
funds to St. Matthews Roman Catholic Church, permitting these
Catholic institutions to purchase this new property for only
$7 per foot, or $9 below the purchasing price.
Some years ago the Federal Communications Commission
refused to grant a Radio Station to the Mormons, because one
of their board members was a Canadian citizen while the law
forbids the granting of broadcasting privileges to foreign agents.
This same Federal Commission granted the Jesuits of New York
and New Orleans radio and television stations, though the
Jesuit Order is an international organization whose members
Approved For Release 2002/08/21
are not free to choose or to keep their citizenship and whose
totalitarian head is a Belgian citizen who resides in Rome.
Since Mussolini declared war on the U. S. and lost, our gov-
ernment has given more than two billion dollars to this con-
quered enemy. Recently the Senate passed a bill which marked
$964,199.00 of tax money to rebuild part of the summer resi-
dence of the pope, located in Italy proper. Christ warned the
apostles not to live in luxury (Matt. 10:10). It is not our concern
if a priest wants to live in a million dollar house, or wants to
spend that much on one corner of his summer cottage; but it
is a crime to confiscate this money from non-Catholic and non-
Italian tax payers.
The land of Alaska, government owned, is rich in uranium
and ore deposits. Some day Uncle Sam will have to sell it to
private owners. The Jesuits, under the direction of a so-called
"Glacier-priest", have been prospecting and surveying the land
for decades. On Jan. 18, 1956 the House of Representatives
passed without objections Bill #6376 which designates one mil-
lion acres in Alaska for a hospital (a territory much larger than
the whole State of Rhode Island). This hospital is to house 350
mental patients. The bill also gives the board of this proposed
hospital such totalitarian powers that it could permanently dis-
pose of any political enemy by declaring him insane. Not one
of our representatives seems to care any longer why so much
land is required and where it is located. It is not difficult to
figure out what the next move of the Jesuits will be. Throughout
our land public property is being donated or sold for a token
price to Roman Catholic hospitals. Non-Catholic business men
and public officials fear reprisals if they would dare to oppose
these jesuit deals.
Hundreds of Catholic hospitals are being built, subsidized
by Federal, State, County and City grants, donating two-thirds
of the cost while the private owners of these hospitals are sup-
posed to put up one-third. Staffed with `slave-labor' (nuns),
and filling each room with 4 patients at $20 a day each, this too
has become a gold mine. If motel owners without subsidy can
make a living by charging $5 for a room, hospitals certainly
ought to prosper. Yet the nuns collect funds from private citizens
and they organize bazaars, as if they were running a charitable
organization of socialized medicine. Within one generation the
IA-RDP80BOl 676R00360007007~94
 entire medical profession and the AMA will be forced to bow to
the Church of Rome.
The balance of the religious population of New York City was
upset by flying one million Puerto Ricans into that city and
placing the unemployed immigrants on relief. Two million Mexi-
cans entered by bus and train illegally into the States, and the
secret promoters coined the deceptive name of "Wetbacks".
Fifty-three per cent of our legal immigrants are Roman Catholics,
while Senator Kennedy introduced a new Immigration Bill
(S 2410) which would increase this number. Hundreds of Roman
Catholics enter the U. S. above quota by the ridiculous method
of a special Act of Congress. No one seems to raise a finger of
protest out of fear of being called anti-Catholic and thereby
losing the next election.
Secret Jesuits, disguised as Protestant laymen (about this
later), have infiltrated our government offices, labor unions
and other institutions, and seem to be able to use these public
institutions to ruin those individuals and organizations which
they were unable to subdue. International jesuitry, through
secret agents and stooges, is advocating merger of labor
unions, merger of the armed forces, greater concentration of
federal power, merger of news agencies, merger of magazines
and local newspapers, merger of charity drives, yea even merger
of Protestant denominations, because it is easier to control,
intimidate or bribe one person in power than dozens of inde-
pendent chieftains.
The Jesuits alone have founded 28 universities and colleges
in the United States, no less than thirteen law schools, which
turn out thousands of Jesuit-trained lawyers and other profes-
sional men who in turn must seek to infiltrate our local courts
as judges, thus obtaining a legal hold on and control of our
cities and Protestant towns. The National Catholic Welfare
Conference has set up in Washington, D. C. a shadow govern-
ment which is so complete with its own Departments of Edu-
cation, Law, Press, Youth, Catholic Action, Social Action, etc.,
that it could take over our government at one minute's notice.
A secret government within a government is the Jesuit's ideal,
constantly pressuring our representatives and senators who are
supposed to represent us. From a central government in Wash-
ington, D. C. all local Catholic organizations (press, law, school,
Approved For Release 2002/08/21
labor, etc.) are directed towards one goal: to place the govern-
ment of this land in the hands of the Catholic Church. By
organizing a secret `Catholic Party,' the Jesuits plan to control
all labor, all industry and all professions.
Even priests are being organized to play their part. Pope
Pius XII made it clear that Romanism is not just a religion, but
a political force as well: "The Church must reject, more em-
phatically than ever, that false and narrow concept of her
spirituality, which would confine her, blind and mute, in the
retirement of the sanctuary" (Pius XII, Feb. 20, 1946). The
American bishops explained the pope's remarks: "The Pope
wishes the clergy to enter politics, and not to confine them-
selves to the sanctuary. The idea that the church is not in poli-
tics is dangerous" (Chicago Tribune, May 5, 1946). Catholics
are no longer to act like ordinary citizens, they are no longer
to vote as Republicans or Democrats, but they must vote as
Catholics: "The time has arrived when Catholics should not
be blind voters in keeping with their long-time Democratic or
Republican faith". (Bishop John F. Noll of Fort Wayne, at Kan-
sas City, Sept. 23, 1946).
The entire history of the U. S. is being rewritten. Our found-
ing fathers are no longer Protestants but Catholics. Many cities
and churches in Arizona and New Mexico are now said to have
been founded by Spanish missionaries as early as 1540, while
in reality this territory was only visited by a small group of
explorers looking for gold and silver. The usual story relates
how Spanish missionaries in the 16th century converted the
Indians, built a beautiful church with a tabernacle of solid gold
and founded the town till they were driven away by hostile
Indians. All golden vessels and church treasures were safely
hidden in a cave before the missionaries fled. Some 200 years
later (actual founding of the town) the missionaries allegedly
returned, rebuilt the old church, but were unable to find the
hidden treasures and gold mines. The lying pens of the Jesuits
are exposed by hundreds of glaring anachronisms. For example,
there were no tabernacles in 1540. The Roman Catholic taber-
nacle was introduced locally in Milan in 1575 (Cath. Enc. 14,
424), but the novelty received so much opposition that the
custom did not become general till the 19th century.
Like the Communists of Russia, the Roman hierarchy in the
41
 pproved For Release 2002/08/21 : CAA-RDP80B01676R
U. S. is rewriting our text-books. Authors and publishers who
refuse to conform are unable to sell their material to Catholic
schools and libraries. When one compares, for example, the
editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica published before 1929
and after that period, one can see how a mysterious hand has
changed a reliable reference work. Articles on Galileo, In-
quisition, etc. were already written by Catholics and have
remained unchanged. Hundreds of other articles: Pope Adrian,
Albigensians, Antonelli, Democracy, Education, Heresy, Jesuits,
etc., appeared after 1928 with a mysterious "X" at the close of
the article, designating an unnamed reviser; latest editions omit
it altogether. Under the pretext of preserving space this revision
has been forced upon the American public, while actually much
material has been added. The following sentences, for example,
were erased: Pope Alexander VI: "Lucrezia lived with his mis-
tress Giulia"; Arnold of Brescia: "At the request of the Pope he
was seized ... and hanged"; Pope Benedict IX: "rapes, murders
and other unspeakable acts". How much space was saved by
omitting these short sentences? What space was saved by
changing Arthur of Britain from a mythical character to a real
Catholic King? The article on Reformation lost 9 pages, but
Pottery kept its 36 pages. The article on the Roman Catholic
Church contains 10 pages of propaganda and falsehoods which
have been refuted a thousand times. Under Torture this alleged
neutral work of scholarship refers to a Roman Council of 384
which, according to the greatest Catholic authority on the
councils, Bishop Hefele, was never held (See Migne, P.L.
160, 66. Not in Mansi 3, 640; nor in He f ele 2, 40).
Legislation has been introduced to change the names of our
off-shore islands in order to make them fit the legends and
frauds of the Jesuits. Contrary to documented historical facts,
Father J.M.J. St. Cyr claims that Abraham Lincoln received
a Catholic education at home, because "the father and step-
mother of Abraham Lincoln both were Catholics" ("Columbia,"
Feb. 1957). Even the history of George Washington is being
rewritten: "He was a Catholic in spirit, so much so, that there
is a warrant for believing that he became a son of the Catholic
Church before he died" (Boston Pilot, Feb. 21, 1948). The
Father of our country bluntly stated: "If the United States ever
loses her liberty, it will be through the Romish Priesthood."
Aeroved For Release 2002/08/21
President Wilson warned: "Our liberties are safe until the
memories and experiences of the past are blotted out and the
Mayflower with its band of pilgrims forgotten; until our public
school system has fallen into decay and the Nation into ignor-
ance; until legislators have resigned their functions to ecclesia-
tical powers and their prerogatives to priests" (Public Papers
of Woodrow Wilson, authorized edition; New York, Harper, 1925,
vol. 1, p. 62). We are now living under these conditions.
We have briefly seen how Roman Catholics have been organ-
ized from the bottom to the top, from innocent first-graders who
illegally sell chances for Catholic institutions, to the Catholic
underworld which with its local bishops control the govern-
ments and elections of our major cities, all working in their
particular fields to make this country Catholic.
It is true that the average Roman Catholic farmer and laborer
is a nice fellow and a loyal American citizen who hates to see
his church enter into politics. As long as these `simple' Catholics
believe in Purgatory, Seven Sacraments, and other dogmas of
their church, Rome is satisfied. But Article 22 of the Syllabus
warns that those Roman Catholics who are professional men
are bound by more than dogmas. Under pain of hell they must
obey their bishops and diocesan statutes which have outlined
the duties of each professional group.
23. Romani Pontifices ... a 23. The Roman Pontiffs ... have
limitibus suae potestatis re- exceeded the limits of their power
cesserunt, jura principum u- (and) have usurped the rights
surparunt. of princes.
The thesis or proposition, here condemned as a heresy and
falsehood, is an established historical fact. The Encyclopedia
Britannica before 1929 under the heading Heresy once read:
"As long as the Christian Church was itself persecuted by the
pagan empire it advocated freedom of conscience." The Church
of Christ was founded in 33 A.D. in Jerusalem (Asia), not in
Rome (Europe). The city of Rome did not have a christian
community until 54 A.D., it had no bishop till 150 A.D., it had
no church building till the 4th century when Emperor Constan-
tine founded the Ecumenical Church with headquarters in Con-
stantinople. As long as the Ecumenical Church existed (325-
A-RDP80B0l 676R003600070077-4
 1054) the Emperor himself held the title of Supreme Pontiff
and the Church was governed democratically by an interna-
tional council which functioned very much like the United Na-
tions of today. There is not one authentic document which dates
from the first thousand years of christianity which makes mention
of an alleged papacy of the Universal Church. During the first
thousand years not one bishop of Rome ever claimed to be the
head of the church, not one ecumenical council was held in
Rome, convoked by the bishop of Rome, or presided over by
a pope. Ecumenicalism and Papalism are opposites. After the
Ecumenical Church split into two parts: East and West, the
Western half began to call itself the "Roman Catholic Church"
(first mentioned in history in 1059 A.D.) and became totalitarian.
By forgeries, fraud, intrigue, assassinations, wars, and excom-
munications the popes subjected the rulers of the West one by
one, and gained political control of Western Europe, falsely
claiming their authority came from God. The papal power was
shaken by the Protestant Reformation (16th century) and nearly
destroyed by the democratic movements of the 18th century.
Hence these vicious attacks by the Jesuits against both Protes-
tantism and Democracy.
24. Ecclesia vis inferendae 24. The Church has not the power
potestatem non habet, neque of resorting to force, nor has it
potestatem ullam tempora- any direct or indirect temporal
lem directam vel indirectam. power.
As we have seen, Rome claims the divine right to use force
to win converts, to use confiscation and the death penalty to
destroy heresy. It further claims the right and power to excom-
municate and dethrone temporal rulers. In the Middle Ages
the popes excommunicated and dethroned the kings of Europe,
beginning with Henry IV. In post-reformation times they ex-
communicated King Henry VIII, Queen Elizabeth, etc., absolv-
ing their subjects from the oath of allegiance and refusing the
Catholics the Sacraments of salvation until they had ousted
or murdered their ruler. In modern times the Vatican overthrew
the government of the excommunicated King of Italy and estab-
lished Roman Catholic Dictator Mussolini without a shot being
fired. It financed Roman Catholic Dictator Hitler in Germany.
It overthrew, with the help of Hitler and Mussolini, the new
Approved For Release 2002/08/21
44
Republic of Spain and placed Roman Catholic Dictator Franco
in power. It supported Peron in Argentina, and when the aging
dictator amended his life and neglected his "obligations" towards
the Vatican, he was excommunicated, and the head of the army
(one man) overthrew the legal government by force and took
the dictatorial powers for himself. As the usurper was not ex-
communicated, he clearly acted on instructions of the Vatican.
Rome claims that she has the right to resort to the sword, to
declare wars and to organize international armies of volunteers
to suppress her enemies in holy crusades. It demands recogni-
tion as a secular power with diplomatic offices in all capitals
of the world. It maintains the greatest spy system in the world.
It excommunicates anyone who dares to maintain that the pope
has no right to temporal power and to use physical force to
obtain his ends.
The bishop of Rome became a secular or temporal ruler in
the 8th century by pure forgery, fraud, theft and murder. All
Roman claims, without one exception, are based on forgeries.
For example, Peter, who was never in Rome, was made the
first Bishop of Rome through forgeries attributed to Rome's
first known presbyter, Clement. The "Clementine literature"
(Migne, P.G. 1) is a huge forgery admitted today by all schol-
ars. The Christian Church was not a `visible' or internationally
organized society till the 4th century, and its so-called "Aposto-
lic Constitutions", which Rome swore for 13 centuries (350-
1600) to be genuine writings of the Apostles, are now admitted
forgeries (C.E. 1, 636). The "Donation of Constantine" and
hundreds of other forgeries, first exposed by Protestant scholars,
are now publicly declared to be forgeries by the Catholic En-
cyclopedia itself (C.E. 5, 118). So the temporal power of the
pope is not by divine right, but by forgery. The so-called Papal
States were stolen from the Lombards, a Unitarian group in
Italy, to which the pope refers as "the most stinking race of
Lombards, a race which by no means can be considered human,
and from which the disease of leprosy originated" (Migne, P.L.
89, 1254). Pope Stephen III in 752 crowned the Frankish king,
Pepin, and by means of a now admitted forgery, "the Acts of
Sylvester," convinced this barbarian to come with his army to
Italy, to drive the Lombards out, and to give the stolen property
to the pope as 'his God-given right and possession'. Thus by
CIA-RDP80BO1676R0036000700-77-4
 force, intrigue, theft and blood the Papal States came into
existence and the pope became a secular ruler or king. When
the armies of Pepin left Italy the Lombards returned and re-
occupied their land. Then Pope Stephen fabricated a forgery
under the name of St. Peter himself, and mailed it to Pepin.
"I, Peter the Apostle, . . . protest and admonish ... and under
firm obligation conjure you . . . to save the beloved city of
Rome from the detested Lombards" (Migne, P.L. 89, 1004;
Baronius 12, 601). Flattered by this miraculous and celestial
letter, and fearing the apostolic curse, the ignorant king once
more came to Rome, and after a great blood bath, once more
handed the stolen property to the pope. This is the factual
history of the Papal States and of the Temporal Power of the
pope. This papal crime is now called a divine right. Those
Italian kings who gave this territory back to the starving peas-
ants, were excommunicated. Those who protest the wealth of
the church and demand land reform, are termed Communists.
Till this day the Italian peasants must pay millions to the Pope
as restitution for the Papal States of the Middle Ages (Vatican
Concordat with Mussolini).
30. Ecclesiae et personarum 30. The immunity of the Church
ecclesiasticarum immunitas a and of ecclesiastical persons de-
jure civili ortum habuit. rives its origin from civil law.
Rome takes it for granted that its clergy are immune, and that
no priest, bishop, cardinal or pope may be arrested and tried by
civil authorities even though a civil offense like rape, murder,
theft or treason has been committed. The issue here is not wheth-
er priests are outside the jurisdiction of civil authorities, but
whether this existing custom is a special privilege granted by
the State, or a God-given right defined by canon law. Those who
maintain that, like the exemption from military services, the
immunity of the Roman clergy is just a privilege which the
State could revoke, are excommunicated. Those who dare to
arrest the Roman clergy for any crime and those who dare to
bring the clergy in a civil court, who dare to testify against them
and who sentence them, are automatically excommunicated and
become subject to the penalties for heresy. Neither a raped girl
nor her mother can bring a guilty priest in court without excom-
munication (Canon 2341).
Like all Roman practices, the alleged immunity of its clergy
is not of divine origin, nor of apostolic origin, but was intro-
duced by fraud. The ninth century fabricated a document, called
the Decretals of Isidore, now known as the "False Decretals"
(Migne, P.L. 130,19), which granted the clergy immunity from
civil authorities and made them subject only to ecclesiasti-
cal authorities. For nine centuries (858-1650) Rome knew it to
be a forgery but falsely swore that this document was genuine
till the Protestant scholars of the 17th century exposed the fraud
to the world. The Catholic Encyclopedia writes: "False Decre-
tals ... a collection of canon laws composed about the middle
of the ninth century . . . Nowadays EVERYONE agrees that
these so-called papal letters are forgeries ... The Middle Ages
were deceived by this HUGE FORGERY ... the official edition
of the Corpus Juris in 1580 upheld the genuineness of these
false decretals . . . In 1628 the Protestant Blondel published
his decisive study: `Pseudo-Isidorus' . . . Since then the apocry-
phal nature . . . has been established as a fact" (C.E. 5, 773).
It would seem that Uncle Sam still believes that Roman immuni-
ty is of divine origin, because it is afraid to arrest the Roman
clergy while the Protestant clergy are dragged into courts and
vilified in our newspapers. This is a strange situation in a coun-
try which is 80% non-Catholic and which boasts of equality. It
would seem that we are no longer a democracy, but at the
mercy of totalitarian pressure groups. When a so-called `Pro-
testant', self-ordained, independent and non-denominational min-
ister sets fire to his church-barn in order to rebuild it, huge
headlines appear in our papers from coast to coast: "Protestant
Pastor sets fire to church to collect insurance." When a Roman
Catholic priest commits murder or rape, the papers are silent
and our police turn him over to his bishop. I know of a priest in
Nebraska who raped a high school girl and was never punished
by his bishop, because the scandal never became public. The
little girl was accused of having seduced the man of God and
was put in a Catholic institution; evidently out of fear for her
baby she signed some papers, became a cloister nun before she
became of legal age, and the hierarchy could rest assured that
she never could reclaim her baby or bring public suit against
the priest for the support of her baby. I know of a priest in
Nebraska who stole half of the funds for a new church, but was
ApphRved For Release 2002/08/21 : Cl -RDP80B01676R003600070077-447
 never tried in a civil court. He received life-sentence from his
bishop and was placed behind bars in a Catholic nunnery. I
know of another priest in Nebraska who stole the cemetery
Funds. I know of another Nebraska priest who was locked up
in an ecclesiastical penal institution in Council Bluffs, Ia. and
in Montreal, Canada, and when he regained his freedom he was
found dead, shot through the eyes, in a hotel of Sioux City, Ia.
Not one of the local or national papers mentioned his death.
He was buried from the Cathedral of Omaha by the bishop
himself, though canon law provides that a suicide must be re-
fused christian burial. The Omaha papers described his funeral
as if the priest had died a natural death. I know of a priest in
Wisconsin who went on a drunk with the doctor's wife. Because
the doctor committed suicide, the scandal became public. Be-
cause the priest had given 'public' scandal (secret scandal is
quite permissible) he was put in a `religious' institution, and his
name appeared in the Official Catholic Directory under the
Diocese of LaCrosse as being "on sick leave", without an address.
Within two years this healthy, young and strong priest was listed
in the obituary of the same Address Book. An almost identical
case happened in Crookston, Minn. There are hundreds of crim-
inal cases which never came before our civil courts, and there
are hundreds of priests, though they had a right as American
citizens to a trial by jury, who are now confined to the penal
institutions of the Roman Church. The Official Catholic Direc-
tory under its more than 120 dioceses, lists about one thousand
priests on sick leave without an address. Those who are actually
sick usually have an address. It is difficult to liberate these
prisoners because the institutions which house them have im-
munity from investigation, they do not keep records, they can
transfer a man from one institution to another, they can and will
deny that any person is kept there, and because of lack of proof
on our part, they will bring libel suit against any informer. The
idea that these imprisoned priests and nuns are insane is ruled
out, not only because of their numbers, but because it is in no
way 'religious' to keep relatives and friends away from sick
people and to prohibit them from visiting the sick, buying
presents for them and praying over them. Any U. S. official who
would dare to raid these secret concentration ~~ camps would make
headlines from WashingtMpporoveods? r Rel having 8/21
invade the sanctity of a holy nunnery. whose sacred constitution
rules that no male may set foot within its gates except a priest.
The raiding official could never be re-elected, nor would his
life be safe for one minute.
Bishops who commit crimes or disobey orders, are locked up
in the Vatican. When they make their quadrennial visit to Rome
or are summoned for a 'promotion', they never know whether
they will ever return to their homeland alive. A bishop of Los
Angeles became "ill" in Rome and stayed there for years till
they shipped his body back. On rare occasions the papers men-
tion the imprisonment of Prelates. Bishop Jan Olaf Smit of Nor-
way accidentally was mentioned in the papers because a Nor-
wegian lady shot him in the St. Peter at Rome. Because Mon-
signor E. P. Cippico managed to escape from the Vatican dun-
geon and the Italian police had to be notified, his name hap-
pened to appear in the papers (N. Y. Times, March 5, 1948).
Such publicity is the exception to the rule. The average Ameri-
can bishop can disappear in Rome without any investigation
by our ambassadors.
Since our courts do not try the Roman Catholic clergy (ex-
cept for cases which became so public that it could not be
'fixed'), our newspapers report only on criminal cases involving
clergy of non-Catholic faiths. The propaganda value alone is
incalculable. This is what is meant by the immunity of the
Roman clergy, a custom which according to historical records
originated in the 9th century, and which Uncle Sam, contrary
to the Constitution which demands equality of religion, seems
to regard as a "divine right". Those who dare to deny it are
excommunicated.
31. Ecclesiasticum forum pro
temporalibus clericorum cau-
sis sive civilibus sive crimi-
nalibus omnino de medio
tollendum est, etiam incon-
sulta et reclamante Aposto-
lica Sede.
31. Ecclesiastical courts for tem-
poral cases of the clergy, whether
civil or criminal, ought by all
means to be abolished, even with-
out consultation or against the
protest of the Holy See.
A See which is Holy ought to be immune to crime, but should
not seek immunity for its admitted criminals. Yet any American
official who should dare to defend our Constitution, who would
RDP80B0l 676R003600070077-4
49'
 demand equality of religion, and who would oppose immunity
for one privileged class, is ipso facto excommunicated, and no
Roman Catholic may vote for him or have any other dealings
with him. The same dogma can be found in many other papal
Bulls.
32. Absque ulla naturalis 32. The personal immunity, which
juris et aequitatis violatione, exempts the clergy from military
potest abrogari personalis service, may be abolished without
immunitas, qua clerici ab violation either of natural right
onere subeundae exercendae or of equity.
militiae eximuntur.
Pagan religions, long before christianity, granted exemption
from taxes and military service to its pagan priests because they
had such a hold on the credulous mob that they could demand
these privileges. Besides, they were few in number. The United
States solved this problem by granting this ancient privilege to
the clergy of all faiths. The clergy may volunteer for a commis-
sioned post as chaplain, but cannot be drafted. Doctors have
sought similar privileges, but the AMA is evidently not as power-
ful as the Vatican. Rome, however, reserves the right to draft
its own clergy for preaching crusades or for instigating wars.
It further claims the right to forbid its subjects to participate
in wars which it may deem unjust or anti-Catholic.
The Jesuits always bring up the ridiculous argument that
Roman Catholics are loyal citizens because they fought in two
world wars side by side with the Protestants and their military
graves are a testimony of their loyalty. No one has ever doubted
that the average Roman Catholic farm boy is as loyal as a non-
Catholic. The disloyalty and subversion is found in the profes-
sional groups of teachers, priests, judges, journalists, police,
sheriffs, mayors, senators, etc., who by papal Bulls are bound
to written and secret `obligations' which are contrary to the
interest of the United States and contrary to its Constitution.
Sons of American Communists have also their military graves,
yet this does not prove that every Communist is a loyal citizen.
Catholic boys served in the army because they were drafted
like all others and they would have been punished like all others
if they had dared to evade it. A test of loyalty pre-supposes
the existence of two opposite powers or directives. Here in the
United States we have never had a papal directive forbidding
Approved For Release 2002/08/21 C
Roman Catholics to participate in a certain war, but Rome
claims the right to do so. Until Roman Catholics receive from
Washington and from the Vatican two opposite instructions
regarding military services, their loyalty has not been tested,
and we can only guess what the majority may do.
To get back to clerical -immunity from military draft, the
issue here is not whether the priest should be exempt, for this
the Roman Church takes for granted. Rome excommunicates
anyone who denies that the Roman clergy is exempt by divine
right. If it were by American law it could be repealed.
37. Institui possunt nationa-
les ecclesiae ab auctoritate
Romani Pontificis subductae
planeque divisae.
37. It is possible to establish na-
tional: churches which are severed
and plainly separated from the
authority of the Roman Pontiff.
. Schism and heresy are punishable by death. As the Jesuit
Order was founded to exterminate Protestantism, the Domini-
can Order was founded to exterminate medieval heresy. St.
Dominic preached the holy crusade against the Albigenses and
Pope .Innocent III (13th cent.) with ,the aid of an international
army of indulgenced Catholics exterminated with the sword an
entire denomination of over one million men, women and chil-
dren. Such are the divine rights claimed by Rome. If the Catholic
Church of the United States should wish to separate from Rome,
as did the Catholic Church of England, the Pope could grant
plenary indulgence to all Catholics of South America and Cana-
da who joined the crusade for the extermination of American
schismatics. Such a crusade could be quite successful if the
President and the head of unified military forces were loyal
Roman Catholics. Any Roman Catholic candidate for the Ameri-
can presidency ought to be asked what he thinks of these papal
dogmas which enter the realm of international and domestic
political affairs.
39. Reipublicae status, ut- 39. The State is the origin and
pote omniuin jurium origo et source of all rights.
fons.
Like the Bull "Immortale Dei", this Bull condemns as hereti-
cal the American principle that all just power is derived from
the consent of the governed, i. e. the people, and that all rights
-RDP801301676R003600070077g
 of the citizens are guaranteed and all duties of the citizens
are regulated by the laws of the land and by them alone, re-
gardless of the racial or religious background of the individual.
Nevertheless, a loyal American must hold that no special rights
and privileges can be granted to certain minorities or classes by
foreign or domestic religious leaders who claim divine powers.
42. In conflictu legum utri- 42. In the case of conflicting laws
usque potestatis jus civile between the two powers (Church
praevalet. and State), the civil law ought to
prevail.
According to Rome, every Roman Catholic in the U. S. has
dual citizenship and dual loyalty, Catholic and American, and
the latter is inferior. The same Pope Leo XIII (d. 1903) decreed;
"If the laws of the State are manifestly at variance with the
divine.law . . . then truly, to resist becomes a positive duty;
to obey, a crime" (Encycl. Chief duties of Christian citizens).
`Divine laws', of course, means the laws of Pope Leo. This pope
also ordered Catholics to change their national constitutions
and bring them in harmony with his constitution: "All Catholics
should exert their power to cause the Constitution of States to
be modeled on the principles of the true Church" (N. Y. Herald,
Nov. 7, 1885). "The real glory of being a citizen of the Unit-
ed States is that it always comes second . . . Being a Catholic
... comes first" (Commonweal, Dec. 2, 1949; vol. 51, p. 231).
No Roman Catholic President could uphold both the Catholic
Constitution (Immortale Dei) and the American Constitution.
No Roman Catholic judge could hold that the marriage of a
Protestant convert (ex-Catholic) before a Protestant minister
is both valid and invalid. Wherever there is a conflict between
American law and Canon law, a loyal Roman Catholic is bound
under pain of eternal damnation to repudiate our civil laws and
democratic principles.
43. Laica potestas auctorita-
tern habet rescindendi, de-
clarandi ac faciendi irritas
solemnes conventiones (vul-
go Concordata) super usu
jurium ad ecclesiasticam im-
43. The civil power has the right
to rescind, to declare and to ren-
der void the solemn conventions
(commonly called: Concordats)
concluded with the Apostolic See,
re ar ve'a tI- e u of Ter M 2/08/21
Ap~rove or a ea e
munitatem pertinentium taining to ecclesiastical immunity,
cum Sede Apostolica initas, without Rome's consent, and even
sine hujus concensu, immo against her protest.
et ea reclamante.
All Vatican Concordats, whether verbal or partially in writing,
are secret. All governments which maintain diplomatic relations
with the Vatican, like Buddhistic China or Shintoistic Japan,
make some secret agreements and concessions, such as the im-
munity and protection of Catholic missionaries and other privi-
leges, in return for which they receive some Catholic concessions,
such as vital information obtained through her vast spy system.
American diplomats openly advocate American diplomatic re-
lations with the Pope, claiming that the Vatican maintains the
greatest secret intelligence service in the world and that her
information is essential for American security. Whether President
Roosevelt cleverly sent a `personal' representative to the Vatican,
whether President Truman allegedly used the offices. of Cardinal
Spellman, or whether President Eisenhower appointed a Cath-
olic `convert' as ambassador to Italy, it would seem that some
American presidents or presidential candidates have made secret
concessions to Rome and maintained secret relations. Newspaper
photos, showing the late Secretary of State Dulles (whose son
is a Jesuit) or Vice-President Nixon bowing before the Pope,
are not intended to get the votes of our Protestant citizens. We
wonder whether these politicians believe in the Jesuit saying:
"The Pope is either ... the Vicar of Christ on earth, or he is an
impostor with whom no respectable person should have dealings"
(Jesuit Weekly "America", April 27, 1940). Our government
officials would not grant immunity to the Catholic clergy and
prosecute the Protestant clergy, unless the United States had
a secret concordat with the pope. If Protestant politicians can
be forced into such un-American activities, what will Rome be
able to do with Catholic politicians? Under pain of excommuni-
cation a Catholic president could be forced not only to honor
all secret and illegal agreements made by former politicians,
but to make many new commitments contrary to the interest
of our country.
The political intrigue of the popes is as old as the papacy.
First, by means of forged documents, the popes tricked kings
IA-RDP80B(11676R003600D70077-4
 and emperors into bestowing great -privileges and powers on
them Then, by means of false accusations and excommunica-
tions of rulers, by means of interdicts (depriving entire nations of
the means of salvation), the popes were able to subdue the
rulers of Western Europe, to subject them to feudal taxes
(Peter's Pence) and to absorb their independent churches into
the Roman Catholic Church. The political struggles between
the popes and the rulers of medieval Europe (Henry IV; Fred-
erick I & 11, Philip IV, etc.) are historical facts, recorded in
government documents and annals by contemporary medieval
authors like Bishop Bonizo, Bishop Otto of Freising, Radevicus,
Matthew of Paris, Aventinus, Villani, Glaber, Peter de Vinea,
Albert Bohemus, Ferretus Vincentius, Berthold, Bruno, etc. etc.,
-(See Migne, Muratori, Monumenta Germ., Pierre Dupuy, 1. L. A.
Huillard-Breholles, Thomas Rymer, etc.). We should like to
give a sample of papal intrigue by giving a short history of the
Church of England and Ireland.
Pope Hildebrand (Gregory VII, 1073-1087) was the, first
Roman pope to attempt to rob the King and Church of England
of their independence. He, had circulated the `tradition' that
since the days of, Charlemagne (787) the churches of the West
had paid an annual tax to the See of St. Peter (Peter's Pence)
and that the kings were to take an oath of subjection or fidelity
to the pope (Migne, P.L. 148, 674). William the Conqueror
(d. 1087), however, did not fall for the pope's lies and refused
to recognize this Benedictine monk as his feudal lord. He wrote
to the pope: "I have never, nor will I now swear fealty; because
neither have I promised such, nor do I find that my predeces-
sors did it to your predecessors" ("Fidelitatem facere nolui nec
volo" Ep. 11 to Gregory VII; Migne,. P.L. vol. 148, p. 748). In
1155, according to official British government documents, the
Church of Ireland was still 100% independent from Rome, but
Pope Adrian IV, the only Englishman ever to become pope
(Lord Nicholas Breakspeare), made a secret agreement with
his friend, King Henry of England, by which independent Ire-
land would become a feudal possession of Great Britain under
the condition that both England and Ireland would recognize
the pope as their spiritual head and pay the annual Peter's Pence.
Such was the secret deal, but publicly the transaction was ex-
plained as necessary, because the Irish were too ignorant and
544pproved For Release 2002/08/21
too un-christian to be independent. Pope Adrian IV wrote to
King Henry II: "Ireland and all islands ? . . which have received
the teachings of the Christian faith, belong by right to Blessed
Peter and to the holy Church ... We are looking forward with
pleasure to your plan of invading this island in order to extend
the boundaries of the Church, to stem the wave of crime, to
correct their morals and to stimulate virtues for the propagation
of the Christian religion ... to teach the uneducated and unciv-
ilized people the truth of the Christian faith" (Thomas Rymer,
"Foedera", 1745 (3rd) ed., vol. 1, part 1, p. 5).
The Rape of Ireland took place in 1155. The island was easily
invaded, but not easily subdued. The Irish, unacquainted with
a hierarchy, resented British appointed bishops and Roman
customs. As late as 1172 Pope Alexander III wrote to King
Henry II and mentions, among "other monstrosities and crimes
of the Irish, that "they all without distinction eat meat during
Lent, nor do they pay church taxes, nor do they at all respect
the sacred churches of God and ecclesiastical persons as they
should" (Migne, P.L. 200, 883).
Before little Ireland was completely subdued to England and
to Rome, the British empire itself lost its independence, as is
the fate of all who get entangled with papal politics. On May
15, 1213, King John signed the British empire over to the Pope
of Rome: "John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord
of Ireland ... We offer and freely grant ... to our lord Pope
Innocent and to his Catholic successors the whole kingdom of
England and the whole realm of Ireland ... holding these lands
as a feudal subject . . . and We swear fealty for them to our
above-mentioned lord, Pope Innocent . . . Moreover, in proof
of this our perpetual obligation and grant, We will establish ...
excluding in all respects the Peter's Pence, that the Roman
Church shall receive annually one thousand marks sterling"
(Thomas Rymer, Foedera, 3rd ed., 1745, vol. 1, part 1, p. 57).
Pope Innocent III also forced King John to sign the oath of feal-
ty: "I, John, by the grace of God, King of England and Lord of
Ireland, from this hour forward, will be faithful (fidelis ero) ...
to the Roman Church and to my lord, Pope Innocent and to his
successors . ? . So help me God and these holy Gospels . . .
May 15, in the 14th year of our reign" (Foedera, vol. 1, part 1,
p. 58). The pope had first supported the British Barons against
 their king, but. as soon as the king was'subdued.he turned against
the barons and condemned their Magna Charta (1215). German
Emperor Frederick II well warned King Henry III of England
(1228) : "Take warning by the past ... Did not Innocent III stir
up the English Barons against King John, as being the foe of
the Church? As. soon as the King had crouched like a coward
and handed over his realm to Rome, the Pope, who only hun-
gered for the fat of the land, gave the Barons up to misery and
death. . ? . Unite yourselves then, and overturn this un-heard of
tyranny, this danger common to us all" (from the official gov-
ernment documents of Frederick II, collected by Huillard-Bre-
holles; translation by T. L. Kington, History of Frederick II,
London, 1862, vol. 1, p. 298).
It was not till 1534 that England was able to shake off the
320 year old. Roman yoke, and to re-establish the independent
Church of England. The popes then excommunicated, King
Henry VIII, Queen Elizabeth, and other British rulers and in-
stigated plot after plot to assassinate them and to overthrow
their government. Once Rome realized that it was a lost cause,
she used the political, situation of the Catholic Irish rebelling
against their Protestant masters as a means to force England
to maintain diplomatic relations with the Vatican. By, papal
concession England received the right to approve any candidate
for an Irish bishopric before official appointment by Rome.
Thus for purely political power Rome secretly betrayed the
Irish Catholics once more.
The past is filled with Vatican intrigue, setting one country
against another for the direct purpose of eventually subjecting
both to Roman Catholic rule. We may not dwell here on medie-
val history, but we must turn to the 20th century. The first
attempt by the Jesuits to revive the Holy Roman Empire was
made in 1914 when Pope Leo promised to make the German
Kaiser emperor of all Europe. The exiled Kaiser admitted in his
Memoirs that "the Pope said to me on this occasion that Germany
must become the sword of the Catholic Church." After this
failure, Fascism was invented which is a Jesuit form of govern-
ment based on the theory that people are not only too dumb,
but also too lazy to govern themselves, and that they are satis-
fied when the government is placed in the hands of one they
an call their own. By making secret deals with a blacksmith
c
in Italy, a paperhanger in Germany, etc., the Jesuits thought
they had discovered the formula for re-establishing the Holy
Roman Empire. Without a shot being fired the King of Italy
abdicated and Mussolini with a handful of blackshirts marched
on Rome. Mussolini signed a Concordat with the Vatican (1929)
wherein he recognized the pope as the owner and ruler of the
Papal States (extinct since 1870), promised to pay an annual
sum from government funds as restitution for these States,
created Vatican City as an independent State within Italy with
the right to print its own money, stamps, etc., and recognized
the Roman religion as the State religion, making it, for example,
a crime for Italian businessmen to provide employment to priests
who have broken their ties with the Church. Uncle Sam later
recognized this unholy scheme of the Jesuits.
In 1933 Germany (Hitler) concluded a Concordat with the
Vatican. Anyone can read in a neutral encyclopedia how the
people of Spain, without any interference from without, orderly
voted for a republican form of government, and how Catholic
Hitler and Catholic Mussolini overthrew by force the democratic
government of Spain and supplanted it with a dictatorship under
Catholic Franco. Both Hitler and Mussolini declared war on the
United States and lost. Yet, after the war the same intrigue
continued. Spain (Franco) signed a Concordat with the Vatican
(Aug. 28, 1953) and within one month Uncle Sam recognized
the new government and signed a Spanish-American agreement
(Sept. 26, 1953). This new Spanish government, hated by 90%
of the people, allows public prostitution (government licensed),
but outlaws public Protestantism. Protestants may only worship
in privacy. Protestants converted from Roman Catholicism are
unable to obtain a marriage license. Catholicism is the State
religion. Yet these Protestant United States, under the pretext
that we need Spanish naval bases, keeps this Catholic dictator
in power by granting millions of dollars to this Spanish govern-
ment, and then we wonder why the Spanish people don't like
their Uncle.
In 1958 Catholic De Gaulle, by means of deserting French
armed forces, blackmailed France into accepting him as absolute
dictator, and President Eisenhower was immediately `advised' to
claim that he liked De Gaulle, and to publicly recommend a
man who overthrew his legal government by force. To show his
CIA-RDP80B0l 676R003600070077-4
57
Approved For Release 2002/08/21 :
 appreciation to the Vatican, De Gaulle immediately pledged
public funds for all Catholic schools.
By means of outright grants, so-called military surplus, and by
loans the U.S. supports and keeps in power all the Roman Catho-
lic dictators of South America against the wishes of its citizens.
South Americans have charged that U. S. big business and even
the underworld (casinos) have received favors from these dic-
tators. It is no secret that Uncle Sam has interfered for
years in the internal affairs of Cuba (Baptista vs. Castro), and
when Castro emerged as the victor the U.S. news wires revealed
the existence of an unholy alliance between U.S. big business
and the Catholic Church, but most newspapers did not dare to
print it (Jan. 28, 1959). When Catholic Dictator Peron double-
crossed the pope and set up a popular government, the latter
excommunicated him and by means of the Argentinean army
(one man) overthrew the legal government by force. As the new
Argentinean dictator was not excommunicated, Rome publicly
approved this new government. When in January, 1959, nearly
all of Argentina went on strike, the government immediately
`drafted' all labor into the army in order to make any striker
technically a `traitor' and subject to the death penalty. Argentine
President, Arturo Frondizi, was hastily flown to the United States
to tell President Eisenhower that "Argentina is a democratic
country" (AP Jan. 19, 1959) and to obtain American `aid' needed
for suppressing Argentine labor. The U.S. has been interfering
with the internal affairs of Venezuela by sheltering ousted
Dictator Jimenez; of Guatemala by selling surplus fighter planes
to those who wish to overthrow the government of Guzman,
etc., etc., while we have imposed heavy tariff on such Latin
democracies as Chile. The U.S. virtually confiscates the earnings
of our Hollywood stars and sends this money to the Dominican
Republic so that its tax-exempt, multi-millionaire dictator, Tru-
jillo, can continue to rule his two million starving subjects and
can send his son with a luxury `warship' to Hollywood to buy
the friendship of our actresses. The New York professor, Dr.
Jesus de Galindez, an outspoken opponent of Dictator Trujillo,
became a victim of the `Spanish Inquisition', was kidnapped
March 12, 1952, evidently flown out of the country and assassi-
nated. Like all political murders of this kind, Uncle Sam has
been unable to solve the crime. This incident further serves as a
58Approved For Release 2002/08/2
warning to those who dare to obstruct the work of undercover
agents who are secretly rebuilding the Holy Roman Empire.
The American public, kept by our newspapers in total ignor-
ance about South American affairs, was surprised to learn that
our dictator-praising Vice-president was almost assassinated
during his `good will tour' in South America and demanded to
know why the marines were alerted to come to his rescue. The
most shocking part of the whole Nixon incident was never di-
vulged to the people. Because of a heart condition, President
Eisenhower has confided all diplomatic secrets to his Vice-
president. The incident exposed the fact that neither Eisenhower
nor Nixon knew anything about our Latin American dealings
concocted by jesuitical minds and executed by our State Depart-
ment.
If it is true, as our diplomats maintain, that the Vatican has
the largest' spy system in the world, we must maintain that secret
Vatican agents (Jesuits) are spying in our country, for without
this their system would be far from complete. We may then
also maintain that those Jesuit-trained American priests who
were arrested and imprisoned in China for spying, might well
have been spying for a foreign power as the pope claims to be.
If our whole intelligence service depends on the Vatican, how
dependable is the Vatican? Unless our agents and those of the
Vatican are unable to track an elephant in the snow, it is unex-
plainable how our allies, Great Britain and France, without any
travel restrictions, could prepare for an all-out war against Egypt
without President Eisenhower ever finding out. The ex-general's
ego was so hurt by his ignorance that he all but declared war
against our allies in favor of Egypt.
Monsignor Tiso, who headed the Catholic Party in Czechoslo-
vakia, betrayed his country by allowing the German army to
enter it. Because the monsignor was not high enough in the
hierarchy and the victors demanded some blood, Rome allowed
him to be hanged as a war criminal. The Nuremberg war crime
trials revealed that some of Hitler's best exterminators "were
Catholic Sisters and nurses. The chief nurse confessed that she
had murdered approximately 210 children . . . Another sister
confessed with a stony grin that she had poisoned 'at least thirty
to forty persons"' (N. Y. Times, July 5, 1945). Pavelic, who
tinder the jurisdiction of Cardinal Stepinac headed the Catholic
CIA-RDP80BO1676R00360007% 77-4
 Action group in Yugoslavia, attacked his country's army from
the rear when Hitler attacked it. After the war Cardinal Stepinac
was allowed to escape through the intervention of Cardinal
Spellman, an American citizen who is up to his neck in foreign
politics. Roman Catholic Andrew Artukovic, wartime interior
minister in the Nazi puppet State of Croatia, who is known as
another "Himmler" and whom the government of Yugoslavia
demands to stand trial "for the mass murders of 200,000 Jews,
Croatians, Serbs, gypsies and clergymen of the Orthodox faith
in 1941-42" (Belgrade, UPI, Jan. 18,'59), was allowed to secretly
enter the United States while the State Department refused to
extradite him. Cardinal Mindszenty of Hungary, who is said to
have spied for the Vatican and to have sought to overthrow the
present communist government of his country, was given refuge
in the U. S. Embassy of Budapest indefinitely. Why a Protes-
tant country should give asylum to a foreign Catholic clergyman,
dangerously engaged in politics, is not easily understood unless
our government has secret commitments with the Vatican. The
U. S. is now at the mercy of Communist controlled Hungary,
because, if we break diplomatic relations with Hungary, the
Cardinal will automatically fall into the hands of the present
government which wants to try him for treason.
Rome either has a great spy system or not. She has foreign
and domestic spies, or not. Her religious leaders are in politics
or not. If the Vatican maintains numerous spies, as our diplomats
claim she does, why does the U. S. allow these spies to pose as
rs of their faith when they are caught in the murders of
t
y
mar
their own countrymen? As we have only scratched the surface
of Vatican intrigues and of our own foreign entanglements, and
commitments with this foreign power, it should be clear to all
that the condemnation of Article 43 of the Syllabus is a very
dangerous dogma.
45. Totum scholarum publi- 45. The entire control of Public
carum regimen, in quibus Schools wherein the youth of a
juventus christianae alicujus christian State are educated .. .
reipublicae instituitar . . . may and must be in the hands of
potest ac debet attribui auc- civil authorities.
toritati civili.
Whether it sounds radical, shocking or even sacrilegious, it is
Approved For Release 2002/08/21
60
a fact that all schools are to a great extent brain-washing labora-
tories. One can place the orphaned children of Protestant par-
ents in a Catholic school and make believing Catholics out of
them. The children of a capitalist will turn into Communists
under Russian education. Whosoever controls the therefore, n-
ob-
trols the youth and the future of the nation. It is, and private,
vious why Rome wants to control all schools, public aand why she forbids the State to govern the education of its
citizens.
In Catholic schools the children are indoctrinated in the Italian
branch of christianity and in such philosophies as will benefit
the political aims of Rome. In such institutions the minds of our
future citizens are poisoned by having the priests (often foreign-
born) teach them that our Constitution is anti-Catholic, that
Uncle Sam is anti-Catholic for refusing aid to Catholic schools,
that Catholics in conscience are allowed to withhold 10% of their
income taxes because of this `double taxation', that Catholics do
not have to confess thefts which are less than $50 if stolen from
the rich, that Catholic employees may steal from their employers
whenever they believe that they are underpaid or treated un-
justly (doctrine of probabilism), etc. etc. Naturally the children
of Catholic schools will not have the same respect for our Con-
stitution and American traditions as those of the Public Schools.
Yet for the sake of peace and religious freedom Uncle Sam allows
these parochial schools to operate if financed by the owners
themselves. The establishment of parochial schools is not a right,
but a privilege.
Rome always has been and still is against the education of the
masses, for it leads to democracy. An ignorant nation yields easier
to totalitarian rule. For example in Brazil, which has the largest
Catholic population (54 million) and where Rome is completely
in control, there are no schools for the common people (75%
illiteracy). The American Jesuits hold that "This business of
teaching every child indiscriminately to read and write results
in nothing more than mass illiteracy ... The indiscriminate edu-
cation applied to all alike under the State systems is the result
of the heresy of the equality of man" ("America", Oct. 31, 1931;
vol. 46, p. 83). In Protestant countries Rome is forced to main-
tain parochial schools in order to compete with public schools.
Her aim is to control both and to destroy the latter. The methods
: CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070&77-4
 proved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
of destroying our public school system are many, and we can
mention here only a few: (1) Without a shred of evidence, all
public schools must be denounced as being atheistic and com-
munist-inspired; (2) Public funds must be demanded for all
private schools, so that other faiths will also withdraw their
children from public schools; (3) Secret Jesuits and other papal
agents, posing as laymen or even as non-Catholics, must gain
control of the public schools.
We all know that a school can only be called atheistic or com-
munistic, when such subjects as atheism or communism are posi-
tively taught, in which case any informed citizen must report
the facts to authorities. A public school can no more be called
atheistic than a public library, public swimming pool or public
baseball park, simply because the Italian -branch of christianity
is not being taught on its premises. The earliest American
schools were `Protestant', and the American Public School system
was introduced (1825), not to further communism (invented
in 1917), but to give education to all citizens, including Catho-
lics. As soon as the American Public School became prominent,
Rome attacked it. Whenever the Public School conducted Bible
classes for its children, Rome accused it of teaching Protestan-
tism and dragged the case in court; whenever the Public School
sought to avoid religious controversies, Rome called it atheistic.
That Rome is not sincere in her charges any educator knows.
With all our public schools the United States has far more church-
goers and far less communists per capita than papal Italy. Nei-
ther are parochial schools per se more religious than public
schools, because American statistics prove that the Roman Cath-
olic Church with its largest number of private schools has always
produced the largest number of criminals (Statistics by prison
chaplains, compiled by Father Leo Kalmer, "Crime and Religion",
Chicago, Franciscan Herald Press, 1936).
Rome would tolerate Public Schools if Roman Catholicism
were taught in all class rooms and if all non-Catholic faiths were
barred. She does not believe in the American system of barring
all sectarian teachings so that the three R's can be taught to
children of all faiths, leaving religious instructions to the church-
es. Our Constitution demands separation of Church and State;
Rome demands separation of School and State.
The popes have condemned the American Public Schools since
their founding and the American Jesuits have denounced and
vilified our American schools especially since the attack against
the Public School by Pope Pius XI in 1929 (Encyclical "Christian
Education of Youth"). By Canon Law Catholic parents must
send their children to parochial schools (Canon 1374)?. Jesuit
Father Paul L. Blakely, editor of the Jesuit Weekly "America",
writes: "Our first duty to the public school is not to pay taxes
for its maintenance . . . The first duty of every Catholic father
to the public school is to keep his children out of it" ("May an
American oppose the Public School", p. 5). The Jesuits of Ford-
ham University in New York openly support the pope in his
stand against our Public Schools, and teach that the pope has
a right to condemn "neutral State Schools from which religion
is barred" ("Social Ethics", thesis 85). Jesuit Father Francis P.
Le Buffe shouted: "Thanks to our Godless American public
school system, which is un-American, we have a generation that
i does not know God" (N. Y. Times, May 17,1943). Bishop Fulton
1 J. Sheen shouted over the radio: "A system of education . . .
A
o
h
Approved For Release 2002/08/
g .. .
t an wr
which teaches that there is no such thing as ng
is not worth preserving. Let it perish" (Catholic Radio Hour,
Jan. 18, 1942). Before his new assignment on TV, Sheen faith-
fully expounded the Catholic encyclicals and not only denounced
our schools, but also the so-called rule by the `mob'. The Jesuit
Father W. J. McGucken defended the pope in his attack against
our schools: "It would be absurd to say that the Pope approves
of our public school system . . . No Catholic can approve of such
a system where religious instruction is barred" (Catholic Way
in Education," Bruce, 1934, p. 98). Bishop John F. Noll of Fort
Wayne, Ind., wrote a booklet on "Our National Enemy No. 1-
Education without Religion." So the attacks against our schools
continue from coast to coast, day by day, by a minority deter-
mined to conquer our land. If one of the 140 million non-Catholic
citizens dares to expose this jesuitical design of overthrowing
our government, he is immediately singled out for character
assassination and ultimate destruction. At the time Pope Pius
XI attacked our schools, the New York Times still dared to sound
a weak protest: "The Pope's encyclical sounds a note that will
startle Americans, for it assails an institution dearest to them-
the public school-without which it is hardly conceivable that
?Timothy Bouscaren (Jesuit), Canon Law, Milwaukee, Bruce, 1948, p.704.
: CIA-RDP80BO1676R0036000*077-4
 democracy could long exist" (N. Y. Times, ]an. 13, 1930). Few
Americans read these `brave' words in small print. If our news-
papers had had any backbone and true national pride, they
would have headlined this papal attack and they would have
reprinted President Wilson's warning: "Our liberties are safe
until the memories and experiences of the past are blotted out
and the Mayflower with its band of pilgrims forgotten; until
our public school system has fallen into decay and the nation
into ignorance; until legislators have resigned their functions
to ecclesiastical powers and their prerogatives to priests" (The
Public Papers of Woodrow Wilson, authorized edition, part I,
vol. 1, p. 62).
"Public schools, public funds; private schools, private. funds"
(P.O.A.U.), is an old American principle. Not only does the
first Amendment to the Federal Constitution forbid the use of
government funds for religious schools, but many States forbid
the same explicitly. The Constitution of Pennsylvania reads:
"No money raised for support of the public schools shall be used
for support of any sectarian school." In the New Jersey School
Bus Case it was ruled that "The First Amendment has erected
a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high
and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach"
(Decision of Feb. 1947). Rome, however, seeks to breach that
wall by playing on the sympathy and big-heartedness of our
non-Catholic citizens. She first pretends to be interested in free
bus transportation only, while hiding her real and ultimate aims.
By portraying the Public School Bus as a `Protestant' monster
which refuses to pick up innocent Catholic children shivering
in the cold, many Americans will feel that a child should not be
made the victim of religious controversy, law or no law. Once
Rome has her foot in the door she demands free medical care,
free lunches, free text-books, etc., as stepping stones to her ul-
timate aim: total support of all her schools and destruction of
the public school. As early as 1917, by a secret coalition with
the Communist party and other minorities, the Catholic Party
of Protestant Holland-which has a Protestant Queen-caught
the Protestants sleeping and succeeded in passing a bill which
gave them public funds for their private schools?. The Dutch
government must pay the salaries of the nuns, the cost of the
'Bernard Vlekke (Catholic), Evolution of the Dutch Nation, New York,
Roy, 1945, p. 331.
Approved For Release 2002/08/21
but the government has nothing to say about
buildings, etc., the appointment of' Roman Catholic teachers. The Roman
Catholics of Holland were told to vote for all Communist-
t f e
sponsored bills, in return for which the e ummuni strategy, voted
Jesuit
Catholic legislation. This is ordinary..
pope has publicly stated that he will even enter into a league
with the devil if it would benefit the Church. Rome needs
public funds desperately, for she cannot compete
big public schools which have better facilities (swimming
pools, football fields, etc.) than her own. She knows that once
she obtains public funds, Protestant school l buildings whdemand
ich now
equal privileges, and the large public dominate our American towns and whirespect our flag
mad
constitution, will then be supplanted by dozens
denominational schools which she can easily the building of a
in order to obtain free city property
new Catholic High School, bishops have often threatened to
close all their schools and to dump a hundred thousand Catholic
children on the public schools. Officials should accept the
challenge and let those children, who never before sought
public education, wait till. such new facilities become available.
Society would benefit by. it. The argument that Roman Catholic
schools save the tax-payers millions of dollars and therefore
their schools are entitled to subsidy, is neither a religious,
nor a legal, but a very materialistic viewpoint. Since when has
the saving of a few dollars priority over constitutional law?
Counties and States could save their hospitals and old folks
homes millions of dollars by introducing mercy killing, but this
still would not make it legal. The same Jesuit logic could be
applied to all private institutions, such as private libraries,
private cemeteries, private swimming pools, Bible camps, wed-
ding chapels and funeral chapels. Rome may use our public
cemeteries, but if she dares to abolish her private Catholic
cemeteries she will no longer be able to refuse `christian'
burial to those who refuse to accept her dogmas; she may use
our city halls for her wedding ceremonies, but if she dares to
abolish her church weddings she will be unable to dominate
her subjects in matters of divorce or annulments; she may use
our public schools, but if she dares to abolish her private schools
she will no longer be able to corrupt the mind of her youth.
CIA-RDP80B0l676R00360007000 1-4
 pproved or a ease 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
She has her own choice, but she has no right to demand public
funds for the purpose of ridiculing our Constitution and des-
troying our democratic way of life.
MORE ABOUT JESUITS
The infiltration of Public Schools by Catholics for the pur-
pose of destroying them, is one of the oldest schemes of the
Jesuits. Before we can explain this, we must first explain the
infiltration system of the Jesuits, a method so sinister, so evil,
but so effective that the 20th-century Communists adopted
the Jesuit method in its every detail.
Pope Clement XIV had demanded that these cursed Jesuits
be extinguished `forever'. When they were re-instated as a
'religious' order in 1814 (Aug. 7), they kept a secret group of
under-cover men who were to infiltrate all branches of society.
Governments feared their infiltration as much as that of the
Communists of today. President Adams wrote in 1816 to Presi-
dent Thomas Jefferson: "Their restoration is indeed a step toward
darkness, cruelty, perfidy, despotism, death. I wish we were out
of danger of bigotry and jesuitism" (Writings of Jefferson, Mon-
tecello ed., Wash., D.C. 1904, vol. 15, p. 60). "I do not like the
reappearance of the Jesuits," explained Adams. "If ever there
was a body of men who merited damnation on earth and in hell,
it is this society of Loyola's." President Lincoln wrote to a
friend: "The Jesuits are so expert in their deeds of blood, that
Henry IV said it was impossible to escape them." It is as
ridiculous to maintain that these American presidents were
misinformed or anti-Catholic, as it is to maintain that Pope
Clement was misinformed or anti-Catholic when he demanded
the total extinction of the Jesuits. The Jesuits are not a `religious'
Order. The Saturday Evening Post speaks of them more correctly
as "the Pope's Commandos," and says that this order was found-
ed "along military lines" (Jan. 17, 1959). The Post further
observed correctly that they are "the most feared, the most
suspected" of all orders, blamed for many "wars, revolutions
and intrigues", and "double talk." It further explains that not
all Jesuits wear clerical garb at all times. "When a delicate
assignment calls for it, he may confront the world in civvies."
The same article finally explains that "Professional and business
men in many countries are conspicuous among laymen - willing
to work with the society, and Jesuit-sponsored groups of
Catholic executives flourish in Germany, France, the United
States, and elsewhere" (Saturday Eve. Post, Jan. 17, 1959, p. 51).
This last statement seems to refer to Jesuit-trained agents and to
"lay-Jesuits" who are to infiltrate all branches of society.
Dr. James J. Murphy, expert in jesuitry, wrote in 1946: "It can
be said with the greatest likelihood that in the United States
Msgr.
the following are lay Jesuits: Father Charles E. Coughlin;
Fulton J. Sheen; Senator David I. Walsh, head of the U. S. Senate
Naval Committee; William T. Walsh, author; Robert Murphy,
ambassador of the U. S. Department of State in Germany;
Francis `X. Woodlock ... It.. is more than probable that ~ L ouis
F. Budenz, recently resigned editor of the Daily Worker, is a
lay Jesuit who was 'planted' in the Communist party" (Con-
v.erted Catholic magazine, Jan; 1946, p. 25). .
Our encyclopedias, used to mention this secret group of Jesuits,
but have been forced to omit this information ,long .before the
year 1928. Up to World War II the Jesuits denied the existence
of any secret branch of activities. When Hitler had successfully
invaded all of Western Europe and had practically restored the
Holy Roman Empire, the Jesuits needed more secret agents
and had to reveal some of their activities.
There are two kinds of Jesuits. The first wear black clothes
and clerical collar, are occupied with serving a church or with
teaching at a college, and give the impression of being ordinary
priests. The second wear plain-clothes, deny that they are
Jesuits, and are engaged in subversive activities of all descrip-
tions. To them the end justifies the means and by special dis-
pensation all things are holy. They may marry when ordered
to do so. They may pose as Protestants and take membership in
a Protestant church. They may assassinate a person when told
to do so, and their vow of blind obedience forbids them to ask
questions or to inquire why such orders were given. They are
used as secret agents within their own country or as spies
in foreign countries. They can be forced to denounce allegiance
to their own country; or, as the Saturday Evening Post describes
the Jesuit, "He may be ordered to speak henceforth, in another
language, or change his nationality" (1-17-59, p. 46). They are
usually not ordained, but trained in one specific field for one
Agroved For Release 2002/08/21 : (IA-RDP80B01676R00360007007
 specific purpose. A secret Jesuit, schooled for 20 years in the
field of economics, sociology, psychology and public speaking,
may be ordered to don a pair of overalls and to seek member-
ship in a labor union in order to study its corruptions, its weak-
nesses and its structure from within, and to climb its ranks
till he becomes its leader. Because of his learning, he will be
able to outtalk any opponent; because of his unlimited funds
he will be able to buy friends and supporters; his easy way
of life (gambling, drinking, women) will impress the gangster
element and other classes; his membership in a Protestant church
or lodge will give him support from non-Catholics; his liberal
or modernistic views will confuse the Communists; and his
public but unexplainable support from the local hierarchy makes
the Catholic element vote for him.
In the same manner the Jesuits have infiltrated the Protestant
churches. Long before the 19th century they succeeded in infil-
trating the State churches of England and Sweden, i. e., the
Anglican and Lutheran institutions of these two countries. The
19th century introduced the so-called Higher Criticism of the
Bible for which the Jesuits had no answer. Fearing that this
new textual criticism might aid the wave of liberalism and
democracy in Catholic countries, and knowing that the Bible
is the sole rule of faith for Protestants, the Jesuits forbade the
reading of hooks on Higher Criticism to all Catholics, but in-
structed their secret agents to teach that very thing in Protestant
schools. As the Jesuits maintain a system of absolute secrecy like
the Mafia (one secret member does not know the other), it is
difficult to point to specific cases. When a secret agent has
fulfilled his mission and is no longer needed in that field, he is
often recalled and the world is told that he has been `converted'
to Roman Catholicism. Whether Newman of the Anglican
Church, Budenz of the Communist Daily Worker, and dozens
of other reported converts to Romanism were secret Jesuits,
converts of secret Jesuits, or genuine converts, one is unable to
prove one way or the other. We do know, however, that Com-
munist Budenz, immediately after his conversion, was deemed-
qualified to teach at a Catholic university, and that Newman
was created a Cardinal though all his works, both before and
after his conversion, reveal his modernistic views on the Bible
and theology, views which are neither Anglican
Release 2002/08/21
The number of Jesuits infiltrating a certain
dor n min tior1 is
very small. It takes only one learned, Popular
fessor to contaminate an entire denomination. Jesuits, usually designated
pose as
to infiltrate the political field of the U. S. A.,
Episcopalians. Rome may feel that this
can be comes closestany d in in doctrine to her own, an Neitherga religious nor a political
English speaking country?
but may be a third-genera-
t needs to be a direct `convert',
agen
tion undercover man. On the other hand, a Jesuit posing aes
a
Protestant may at men allow his son to become a Jit.
know whether they are
The very thought that men no longer know whether they are
The very thought ht th th
voting or working for a Catholic or not, creates a fear which has
, Some of
been so psychologically effective
faith have beeno conspicuous
our statesmen of the Episcopalian
for their lack of support of Protestant institutions and for their
large donations to the Church of Rome. Since World seem II
Jesuits
and the rise of Communism in Germany, the
have succeeded in uniting some German Lutheranh bishops
and Roman Catholic bishops into a fellowship whic Martin
eran
Luther would condemn. In the United
tSStates thwhiutisome
:hurches seem too solid for the Jesuits crack' e
other denominations e ti
Communists and other isms as well. One
the Jesuits, but by by opposite directions:
denomination is being pulled to four oRomanism, Communism, modernism and fundamentalism, while
its founder stood for the last one only. One invite aofCaa large
Protestant church in Long Beach,
priest to preach his Lenten sermon and he introduced the
speaker as if the no Reformation had
ba kthen two
differen been
if there were n problem of mixed marriages.
churches, or as if he had solved the pIt is evident that dozens of our universities and en tote such
colleges have been infiltrated by secret Jesuit ag
famous institutions hcat University Seminary, Co um-
thhe the University o off Chicago, Union
bia University and many other Eastern institutions of learning.
This does not mean that these schools arenounder control of
Rome, nor can it be said that their presidents are
compli-
staunchest American citizens. to be marked it
infiltration
ment for any organization or group
 because the Jesuits would not bother unless they thought them
to be the backbone of our nation. The purpose of secret Catholic
professors at Protestant or State institutions of learning is mainly
negative. By means of these impostors Rome can pretend to
have 'non-Catholic' or neutral support for her false claims and
fraudulent activities. For every author who exposes the tactics
of the Vatican she can order a Trotestant' professor or an
ordinary 'layman' to denounce his book as a vicious, anti-
Catholic attack of distorted facts and malicious lies. She can
order an 'agnostic' doctor to admit the miraculous cures of
Lourdes. She can use an alleged 'neutral' news service to
announce the miracle of our Lady of Fatima as Gospel truth,
though reported some 40 years after its supposed occurence.
She can use 'reliable sources' of a foreign country to make our
newspapers report the alleged appearance of Christ to the
pope of which the pope himself was ignorant till he read it
in our papers), without our journalists going through the usual
procedure of an interview, inquiring what Christ had to say.
She can quote Trotestant' scholars who will 'admit' as an in-
disputably historical fact that Peter founded the Church of
Rome. Besides these immediate and indirect aims, complete
control of the infiltrated organization is the Jesuit's ultimate aim.
Though probably less than 100 Jesuit undercover agents have
been at work in the United States during the early part of the
20th century, it is evident that since World War II Rome planned
to increase their numbers into the thousands. As few volunteers
can qualify for the job of Lay-Jesuit or Vatican-agent and as
ten thousands are needed, Rome was forced to give more
publicity to some of her secret projects. Of late she admits that
she has secret recruiting stations which turn out thousands
of secret nuns and monks, people who wear civilian clothes
but are bound by oath to.follow blindly the directions of their
monastery. This secret Order now admits to have been founded
as early as 1791-the year our Bill of Rights was adopted-at
the time when the Jesuit Order was outlawed by the pope
himself. Its headquarters are in Chicago, whose Catholic under-
world put Rome in power there.
In their magazine "America", the Jesuits came very close to
admitting the existence of their "lay-Jesuits" or Jesuit-trained
undercover agents, when they raised the question: "Can a
Approved For Release 2002/08/21
70
Catholic become a Methodist, a Presbyterian, a Catholic all at the same
an Atheist, and yet remain a good time?" This question was answered in the affirmative: "He can,
if he is on the job of training a Catholic Evidence gu. "
0
("America," a Catholic Review of the week; New fY or Nov. 30
denies his
1940; vol. 64, no. 8, p. 198). A man who py but could
religion and Christ may remain a "good Catholic ,
not be much of a "Christian". He is merely a politician who holds
that the end justifies any means. He is more interested in the
numerical strength of his denomination and the political power
of his pope than in honesty, the truth and the glorification Act of
God. Instead of entering this country by a special Congress, he should be told to leave. Instead of public funds and
immunity, he should be given notice to register as a foreign
agent. Switzerland, which is regarded as the most liberal and
tolerant country in the world and which has given asylum to
all refugees, Protestants, Jews, dethroned kings and dictators,
communists and anti-communistslasl fanned oreign the
entangle-
an consequently it has been spared from a
ments e-
ments and wars.
Roman Catholic News services, under the date line: "Indiana-
polis, Ind. (NC) ", revealed that we now have 6,000 secret nuns
engaged in undercover activities. Evidently for the purpose of
recruiting new members, the official diocesan paper of Pitts-
burgh, Pa., explained their activities as follows:
"Indianapolis, Ind. (NC)-Catherine S. is a bookkeeper for
a large manufacturing firm not far from here. Thirty-five years
old, Miss S. has been with the company for 12 years. She dresses
neatly, likes music and occasionally attends a movie or stage
play. She lives alone in a modestly furnished apartment.
What, you may ask, makes her newsworthy? . . . Catherine S.
is a member of the DAUGHTERS OF THE HEART OF MARY,
an unusual religious society founded 166 years ago. Although
Catherine does not wear religious garb or live in a convent, she
is a Religious-taking vows of poverty, chastity and obedience...
Members of the Society who live a community life are known as
'INTERNS', while those who live in the world are called
'EXTERNS'. Even interns in this distinctive society do not wear
a religious habit.
The interns engage in apostolic activities such as STAFFING
CIA-RDP80BOl 676R003600070O7-4
 SCHOOLS. The exterris function to give a greater PENETRA-
TION of the religious life into general society. In the ranks of
the `hidden' religious [nuns] are many prominent women. Some
years ago, an extern won a national award without her identity
as a religious even being remotely suspected.
Externs have been a part of the Daughters ever since their
founding in France during the Reign of Terror. They formed,
as it were, a `FIFTH COLUMN' for God at a time when mem-
bers of religious orders were being persecuted. They could
carry on their work for Christ without fear of detection.
In its 166 years of existence, the Daughters have spread
throughout the world. Membership is now more than 6,000 and
they are found in 23 U. S. dioceses.
The main center for the Daughters of the Heart of Mary is
at the Ephpheta center, 330 W. Wellington Ave., Chicago 14,
Ill." ("Pittsburgh Catholic", Jan. 24, 1957).
Though the Externs of the Daughters of Mary infiltrate all
offices and all branches of society, schools included, the Interns,
likewise posing as civilians, specialize in infiltrating our public
school system. By invading a Protestant county or State en masse,
they gain temporary control of the Public High Schools, during
which time Roman Catholic principals are put in authority.
Once their task has been accomplished, this secret force moves
on wherever directed to go. For example, in town after town
in Protestant Minnesota, even towns with less than 3 Catholic
families, one can find a high school with a Catholic principal,
as if out of 140 million non-Catholic citizens no one can qualify
for the best paid job in town. We find then the ridiculous
situation wherein Catholic principals drive their own children
every morning to a Catholic school of another town, deeming
their own public schools not good enough for them.
Similar "Interns" turn up in our newspapers under different
for example, explained
names. The Los Angeles Examiner,
that "six of the seven `interns' now being trained under the new
program at Immaculate Heart College are working in Los
Angeles city high schools . . . They now hold regular teaching
jobs under personal guidance of well-experienced members of
Immaculate Heart" (L. A. Examiner, Oct. 20,1957).
Not only secret nuns, but also secret monks are being trained
by the thousands to infiltrate our schools and other institutions
Ligourian", article
for the direct purpose of destroyirig" them. An
appeared in the Catholic paper, "The Lseeking new recruits among teenagers explains the secret or
e
ganization known as the "Secular Institute."
nsti t " N activitiesaturallto Hole
article does not too openly admit its political -
members, but tries to give it a `religious' twist:
`What is the Secular Institute? ofr eligious life ishknowneas
This new vocation, this eo is
the Secular Institute ? . . A secular institute is a society th of p op is
living in the world and yet attempting to live up to e idea
d
and aspirations of those who are actual members of approved
religious orders . . . In other words, the secular institute does
the work of the nun and the monk without binding its subjects
to the conformity and the community lie beof the longs tunaand the
monk. Take the example of the girl institute. She is in the world, oftentimes living without
reli-
giving the appearance of belonging to any special type
gious congregation at all. If one were not told that she is that
member of the secular institute, one would never guess
such is the case . . . She would be one of the neighborhood
in her appearance.
The primary purpose of the girl's joining a secular institute
is to INFILTRATE the world with the teachings of Christianity
and to do this in such a way as not to arouse suspicion on the
part of those who have no belief in Christianity Which best a
unfor-
watered-down and false belief in Christianity,
tunately is the case of a large number of baptized Christians.
for
The idea of the secular institute is to capture
has been engaged
Christ, without the world's knowing that it in battle.
... Every army must have various kinds of troops-those who as the openly show themselves by uniform and action on cause of. vy of
the nation; and those who generally promote the ictory
?' silently and unknown.
She is subject to her superiors in the central house of
her community. She follows a particular kind of life, a life
according to a rule, whether it be at home with her parents,
or in a hospital as a nurse, or in a factory as a worker, or in
a department store as a clerk behind the counter,
without with
approbation of her superior. She does nothing
77pproved For Release 2002/08/21: CIA-RDP80B01676R003600077v077-4
 direct or at least indirect approval.
. It is not to be thought that all the members of the secular
institutes always live at home with their family; or that the
work of the secular institutes is always merely to influence
society by the example of right living and to infiltrate society
with the ideals and the spirit of Christ.
Other secular institutes have communities, centers, homes
where those members live (wearing the clothes of the people
of the world, of course) who have no special reason for living
outside the community. They may teach in public schools, . ? .
. Only one thing remains to be said . . . the addresses of
their headquarters which we list below.
OPUS DEI - Rev. Joseph Muzquis
Men's Residence
5544 Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, Ill.
MISSIONARIES OF THE
KINGSHIP OF CHRIST
Rev. S. Hartdegon, O.F.M.
Holy Name College
14th and Shepherd Sts.
Washington, D. C.
(from The Ligourian, Jan., 1957)
Women s Residence
4944 Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, 111.
SCHOENSTATT SISTERS
OF THE MARY OF THE
CATHOLIC APOSTOLATE
Sister M. Winfriede
New Schoenstatt, R.R. 1
Madison, Wis.
Here then, we have quoted from Catholic literature a few
lines of black on white admissions that Rome through under-
cover agents is out to conquer the world by surprise, without
the world knowing that it was in danger till it is too late. As it
is impossible in the religious sense of the word to win a convert
for Christ without the `victim' knowing about it, Rome speaks
here in a political sense. Hidden, Jesuit-trained monks and nuns,
posing as Atheistic or Communistic authors, as Episcopalian
statesmen, Protestant labor leaders, non-Catholic professors,
Lutheran bishops, Methodist youth leaders, Baptist school
teachers, Presbyterian secretaries for government offices,
fallen-away Catholic sheriffs and even non-religious call-girls
have been organized, Mafia-style, into an underground fifth-
column with a striking force so fantastic that its victims will
ever know what hit them. It is apparently later than we think.
n
he adi
When Hitler spoke id
f eC ob uWillgAmerica awaken nnttime?hat
this would be an ins ] the Article 45 of the Schools must be brought n into the hand of
control of our Public
the Roman Catholic Church. Undercover agents, demanding
public funds for private schools, are to bring about this change.
Therefore, the American public must think twice before of
'changes its educational system. When Robert F.
subsidy for
New York State University in Albany proposes professor or
parochial schools; when Dr. Charles J. Donahue, p
Fordham (Jesuit) University in New York City, complains aboeut
aa lleged `double taxation' whereby
rebat state Catholics system 'which they
full share in taxes to support ystem
sincerely feel is, incompletely, suited to the particular needs of
their, children" (Washington, D. C. AP, Sept. 1, 1958); when
George N. Shuster, president of Hunter College, New York,
.speaks of "the grotesque stupidity of Protestants" for, opposing
subsidy "Catholic Spirit in America," p. 175) mark own their
names so that you may know the enemies of our American
an
schools and traditions. The issue of public funds for private
schools is so important to the Roman church that politicians,
like Joseph V. Aguiar Jr., are not ashamed to advertise in news-
papers: "If elected, I will introduce a constitutional amendment,
to force the state to pay 50% of the cost of all new parochial
schools" (Fall River, Mass., Herald News, Sept. 5, 1958).
47. Postulat optima civilis
societas ratio, ut populares
scholae, quae patent omni-
bus cujusque e populO clas-
sis pueris . . . eximantur ab
omni Ecclesiae auctoritate.
48. Catholicis viris proba-
ri potest ea juventutis in-
stituendae ratio, quae sit a
Catholica fide et ab Eccle-
47. The best system of a civil
society requires that popular
schools, which are open to all
children of people of every class
. should be freed from all
ecclesiastical authority.
48. This system of instructing
youth, by separating them from
the Catholic faith and from the
jurisdiction of the Church, may
be approved by Catholic men.
siae potestate sejuncta.
Theologically
"civil" is the opposite of "ecclesiasti-
7Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600076677-4
 cal", and may be synonymous with secular, lay, non-religious,
governmental or State. As we have seen, Rome believes in
education of the higher classes only and does not believe in
the equality of men. Here, Rome warns the Catholic men
(Catholic women, like the lower classes, have no equality)
that in democratic countries the popular or public schools come
also under her jurisdiction.
49. Civilis auctoritas potest 49. Civil authorities may prevent
impedire quominus sacro- the highpriests of religion and
rum antistites et fideles po- the faithful of the laity from com-
puli cum Romano Pontifice municating freely and mutually
libere ac mutuo communi- with the Roman Pontiff.
cent.
While admitting that she has the largest spy system in the
world, Rome holds that her bishops and her plain-clothes agents
are ex lex, that is, outside the jurisdiction of the State they
live in, and their travel, to and from Rome, may not be restricted
even in war time. Secret Concordats between the Vatican and
other States cover these items here defined. Cardinal Spellman,
who apparently appointed himself as Chief Chaplain of all
Catholic forces of the U.S.A. (though he has neither the time
nor the training for such a full time occupation, and merely
distributes cigarettes), not only travels unrestrictedly during
war time, but at government expense. During World War 11,
when Cardinal Spellman was to fly from Spain to England,
Spanish officials prevented him the last minute from boarding
a certain plane and gave the Germans the o. k. to attack the
plane over the channel.
By solemn Concordats Roman Catholic Hitler and Roman
Catholic Mussolini were in unity and harmony with the Pope:
the first dictator was called "the secular arm of the Church",
while the Pope called the second dictator "the Man of Provi-
dence". When this Man of Providence declared war on the
United States, he was neither excommunicated nor reprimanded
by the pope, but the Italian Church continued to pray for an
Italian victory over its enemies, the United States. When Japan
destroyed our navy by a sneak attack at Pearl Harbor, the Pope
was so sure of an Italo-German victory that he immediately
entered into diplomatic relations with our arch-enemy, Japan.
When our American soldiers invaded the North African conti-
nent in order to find a route to Italy, the Catholic hierarchy
of the Allies had tipped off the Catholic hierarchy of our
enemies, the Pope had tipped off Hitler, and the German armies
were waiting for our boys. The massacre that followed is now
history. War crime investigations, though almost totally censored
where Vatican intrigue is involved, revealed at least this in-
stance of treason. The N. Y. Times reported it as follows: "Paris,
June 20 - Adolph Hitler was warned in August, 1942, through
sources originating in the Vatican of the Allies' North African
plans, according to evidence read before the examining magis-
trates today in the case of Otto Abetz, former Nazi diplomatic
representative in France" (N. Y. Times, June 21, 1946).
According to Drew Pearson, Pope Pius XII and Cardinal
Spellman talked every Wednesday at 1:00 P. M. by trans-
Atlantic phone, all during the war; and although connections
were made between two enemy countries (?), Spellman's con-
versation was never censored.
Roman Catholicism is an international religion. Therefore,
in case of a world war, its members are found both among the
Allies and among our enemies, and, as in the case of Spain,
among the so-called neutrals. To allow these members to com-
municate freely is national suicide. In spite of the thousands of
white crosses that mark the graves of our soldiers, Rome throws
her anathemas at those who favor national security over war-
time `vacations' for our so-called highpriests of religion. The
word `religion' means the Roman Catholic religion. When the
Protestant Bishop S. M. Molina wished to attend a bishops'
conference in England, Spain refused him an exit visa. This
was in peace time.
53. Abrogandae sunt leges
quae ad religiosarum fa-
miliarum statum tutandum,
earumque jura et officia
pertinent; immo, potestas
civile gubernium us omni-
bus auxilium praestare, qui
a suscepto religiosae vitae
instituto deficere ac solem-
53. Laws which give protection
to the status of Religious Orders
and which deal with their rights
and activities, ought to be
abolished; yes, the civil govern-
ment may even lend assistance to
all who desire to free themselves
from the accepted rule of re-
ligious life and to break their
76 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B0167A03600070077-4
 nia vota frangere velint; pa-
riterque potest religiosas eas
familias ... extingere.
solemn vows; and the govern- this plague of the Agapetae (nuns) to be in the Church? Whence
ment may also suppress these Re- come these unwedded wives, these new kind of concubines,
ligious Orders ... these prostitutes ... their real aim is to indulge in sexual inter-
" 402). This Saint speaks of "Sisters"
22
L
P
Mi
.
.
gne,
(
course
, There are about 2,000 ex-priests in the United States, hundreds who wear their "lying garb" to hide their "swelling wombs" and
of whom have been converted to Protestantism while large 'use drugs to procure abortion." Jerome describes the dress of
numbers of them are serving as ordained Protestant ministers the first nuns in every detail and concludes: "Such may have
throughout the country: Dr. Sommese, Dr. Fernandez, Dr. admirers of their own and may fetch a higher price in the
Barrois of Philadelphia, Pa.; Rev. Payas, New York; Rev. market of sin, merely because they are known as `Virgins'
Guglielmi, New Haven, Conn.; Rev. Loughran, Woodburg, (Migne, P.L. 22, 401). Jerome also describes the monks: "But
Conn.; Dr. Bauer, Plymouth, Wis.; Dr. Russo, Milwaukee, Wis.; I will not speak only of women (nuns). Avoid men (monks) also,
Rev. Burke, Atlanta, Ga.; Rev. Daly, Corpus Christi, Texas; when you see them loaded with chains, and wearing their hair
Dr. Colacci, St. Paul, Minn.; Rev.Fredette, Nora Springs, Ia.; long like women contrary to the precept of the Apostle (I Cor.
11:14); not to speak of beards like those of goats, black cloaks,
Rev. Zerhusen, Elkader, Ia.; Rev.. D'Ostilio, Des Moines, Ia.;
Rev. Ackerman,; Miller, S. D.; Revs. Vinet, Sullivan, O'Gorman,
McLoughlin, Mitchell, Foster, Adams, Borman, Connahey,
LaVallo, Kieda, Groening, Florez, Mateo, Arrien, Beckes,
Angulo, De Champlain, Cifuentes, Moschetti, Stuber, Zachello
and hundreds of others. According to Roman Catholic theology,
Rome has the divine right to put these Protestant ministers to
death, and the United States has no right to interfere in these
mass-murders. The greatest crime a priest or monk can commit
in the eyes of Rome is not treason, murder or rape, but loss
of faith in the Italian branch of christianity. Hundreds of monks
and priests whose consciences were bothered by non-biblical
Roman practices and who made the mistake of confiding their
inner struggles and convictions to their superiors, have been
thrown in the dungeons of monasteries and left there to die.
Monasteries are immune from investigation by civil authorities.
To understand the monastery we must know something about
its history.
When 4th-century Rome abolished paganism by law, it in-
herited ten thousands of temple dames, prostitutes and pagan
"virgins" who wore the identical dress of the nuns of today.
Hundreds of bearded tramps and hoboes roamed the streets of
pagan Rome and were dressed exactly like the monks of today.
Rome forced these pagan monks and nuns to embrace christ-
ianity, but did not stop their immoral lives. Jerome (d. 420).
famous Bible translator, Bible commentator, Father of the
Church and Saint, who lived right in Rome, asked: "How come
f
k
ens o
and bare feet braving the cold. All these things are to
the Devil" (Migne, P.L. 22, 413). Jerome had no idea that this
immoral group of eccentric monks and nuns were to become
a standard feature of the Roman Church and would grow so
powerful as to become its rulers. To rid the city streets of the
ever growing pest and popularity of monks and nuns (Mansi
11, 963), the first Western monastery was built, Monte Cassino
(6th century), and an Italian desert dweller, St. Benedict (who
was not a priest, nor ever attended church services, nor received
the sacraments, but who, according to the Lives of the Saints,
ran naked in the desert with dozens of naked virgins in order
to `harden' himself against temptation), was selected to become
the first Abbot of the first monastery. From the very beginning
the monasteries were used to imprison heretics, kings and
political enemies. Within 50 years these immoral laymen and
laywomen were not only admitted to ordination (priestesses,
bishopesses; C. E. 3, 484), but controlled the Western churches.
They who falsely claimed to forsake the world became its
rulers. In 575 Benedict I became the first Benedictine monk to
be made Bishop of Rome, and from 575 to 1075 thirty-three
popes were Benedictine monks. The Catholic Encyclopedia
admits the gross immorality of most of them (under Benedict,
John, etc.). Speaking of the history of the popes from 754 to
1073, the greatest Roman Catholic church historian, Msgr.
Duchesne, writes: "The Lateran (Vatican) became a resort of
persons of ill-fame, and no virtuous woman could remain in
78 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B0167R003600070077-4
 safety at Rome" (Beginnings of Temporal Power, 1908 ed., p.
224). Catholic Cardinal Baroi ius calls this period "the reign of
the whores" (Annales, vol. 15, p. 501). Yet without these
"whores" the bishop of a city (urbis) could never have become
a religious ruler of the world (orbis).
Monks and nuns lived together as 'brother and sister' in the
same monastery (Mansi 13, 755). By the 11th century the Abbots
of monasteries had become bishops and worldly princes who
raised their own families. The Benedictine nuns were so im-
moral that they were banned in nearly every country. Monkery
was just about to die out when East and West separated
(Schism of 1054), and Roman Catholicism was born in Western
Europe. The Bishop of Rome made himself the dictator of the
West and founded new Orders to exterminate heretics and to
subject the Western kings. Peter Abelard (1142), St. Bernard
(1147), Gilbert of Gemblours (1200), Peter of Limoges (1233),
all of whom were Abbots of monasteries, admit the great im-
morality and sex crimes perpetrated in monasteries. The Council
of Beziers (1233) reveals that the monks used "immoral and
shameless women" and "public whores" (publicas meretrices)
to attract the peasants to their church carnivals (Mani 23, 276).
St. Bridget of Sweden (d. 1373), a reformer and founder of 50
monasteries 'for women only', relates that the monasteries are
houses of prostitution, their doors open day and night. She calls
the monks the "Mediators of the Devil" who are not ashamed of
their adulteries, but "they are manifestly delighted in it, because
their whores with swollen bellies walk with other women"
(Birgitta, Revelations, bk 4, chapt 33). All councils, all church
historians, all the Saints of the Middle Ages denounce the im-
morality of monks and nuns. All modern scholars of church
history admit that the monasteries were used throughout the ages
to imprison and torture thousands of heretics and political
enemies (Milman, H. H., Hist. of Lat. Christianity). The Abbot
of the monastery is king within his own domain, with the divine
right to punish his subjects with torture and death. The Monastic
Rule of St. Benedict prescribes excommunication and punishment
for unrepentant inmates; if they still refuse to change their ways
they are submitted to torture; "and if he does not even then
amend . . . then the Abbot shall act as a wise physician
(sapiens medicus) . . . then at last the Abbot may use the
Approved For Release
surgical knife (ferro abcissionis), as the Apostle says: 'Remove
evil from among yourselves' (I Cor. 5:13)" (Rule of Benedict,
chapt. 28; Migne, P. L. 66, 520). Such is the immoral, criminal
and sadistic institution of monasteries which claims immunity
from civil governments.
Though white slavery under the cloak of religion is as old as
religion itself; though young virgins were given by parents to
monasteries without the consent of the virgins themselves (C.E.
15, 459); though orphans and illegitimate children of priests
were forced to accept monastic life and used for immoral pur-
poses (Erasmus) throughout the Middle Ages; it would seem
that the idea of founding an Order of Nuns consisting exclusively
of immoral girls did not originate till the end of the 17th
century. One of the strangest Order of Nuns was founded in
1672 by a French priest, Father Eudes (a Saint, d. 1680), aided
by his companion, a Parisian night club dancer, Margaret
Uacoque (a Saint, d. 1690). These two not only invented the
Heart-worship' of Mary, but "for female sinners he founded
the Order of Charity, to recall them to a christian life" (Roman
Breviary, Aug. 19). Instead of selecting nuns from the best
families, this French Order of Nuns selected its victims from
girls who were involved with priests and with other Roman
Catholic bigwigs, evidently for the purpose of preventing their
gross scandals from reaching the Protestant and democratic
world. This Order, under various names, still exists today.
Miss Marcelina of the Philippine Islands, a pretty college
girl who fell in love with Father Lallana and married him, re-
lates how two nuns tricked her into taking a ride and how she
was forcibly placed in a Good Shepherd Convent. Fearing the
future of her baby, she signed her rights away under duress.
Without court trials and by means of kidnapping, thousands
of girls, nuns and priests have been whisked away from the
world. Like dozens of others, Mrs. Marcelina Lallana succeeded
in escaping and is now able to tell the following story: "I was
requested to fill out a form wherein I had to certify that I was
willing to stay and that I was ready to meet every and all con-
ditions they would give. Actually, I was forced to sign this
paper" (Christian Heritage, N. Y., Feb. 1958, p. 20).
A few years ago there was a riot in the Good Shepherd Con-
vent in Montreal, where the inmates were "fighting police and
2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
81
 nuns tooth and nail for more than three hours" (Montreal Gazette, Oct. 9, 1945) in protest against what they described as" concentration camp conditions." Eleven girls, ranging from 17 to 20, were placed in strait, jackets and locked up in jail, how police and nuns work together. Investigations further revealed that "no payment is given the girls, who work in the laundry and who make clothing for various firms which have contracts with the community . . . Children, who may be young as eight years old, may never see their parents except
through a grill of iron bars" (Montreal Gazette, Oct. 10, 1945).
in jail revealed that the girls wore only outer garments, without a stitch of under garments, and they com- plained that they were forced "to say the rosary the whole day long, even while at work." Other charges: solitary confinement,use of strait jackets, poor food, etc. Had it not been for one alert newspaper, the incident would never have become public: "Provincial police on duty Sunday night failed to report the (Montreal Gazette, Oct. 10, 1945).
laundries and Catholic printing shops of these tax-exempt in-
stitutions compete with private industry and fill the coffers Rome. in the United States we too have the "Good Shephercl and the "Magdalen Sisters", piously named after Mary
Magdalene, the alleged public woman of Jerusalem. The CatholicEncyclopedia explains: "Magdalena, the members of certain re-
ligious communities of penitent women who desired to reform their lives" (C. E. 9, 524). This religious Order of holy nuns is according to moral standards into three classes: the Magdalens proper . . . admitted to solemn vows,(2) the Sisters of St. Martha, who : .. could not undertake the obligation of solemn vows, and (3) the Sisters of St. Lazarus, public sinners confined AGAINST THEIR WILL" (C.E. 9, 524 ). "GOOD SHEPHERD, OUR LADY OF CHARITY OF THE.- The aim of this institute is to provide a shelter for girls and women of dissolute habits, who wish to do penance for their iniquities and lead a truly christian life. Not only VOLUNTARY penitents, but also those consigned by CIVIL OR PARENTAL AUTHORITY are admitted. Many of these penitents DESIRE
'] EIvIA1N FOR LIFE; they ard admitted` to take vows,
TO
and `form ,the class of `IVlagdalens','under the direction of 'the
Good Shepherd': PRAYER, PENANCE AND
Sisters of the G
MANUAL LABOR are their principal occupations The
Penitents', nitents', `Magdalena',` and `Preservates' form perfectly' dis-
classes, completely segregated from one another ...The
tinct
Good Shepherd is a branch of `Our Lady of Charity' ...founded
by Blessed John Eudes" (C. E. 6;647).
Thus us the Roman Church admits that in this modern space age
there ere are American Nuns who were forced by judges, police
chiefs, bishops or parents to embrace the Order of Father Eudes
their will", while others who during their captivity
"against,
or solitary confinement are said to have expressed a`desire' to
ontinue their penance and manual labor for life, are admitted
c
to perpetual vows and thus lose their right ever to return to he
world. Anyone who maintains that such institutions should either
be e outlawed or subjected to inspection by civil authorities is
automatically excommunicated and delivered up to Satan.
When I lived in Nebraska during the late thirties a nd early
?
1 of which my former classmate was chaplain. If this
institution still 'exists exists today, let me make it clear that my remarks
do in no way reflect the present administration of this nunnery,
nor the e present administration of police departments, judges,
courts, , or anything else related to juvenile cases. My classmate
con-
Was a man who felt very unhappy in the priesthood and con-
sequently had developed into a drunkard. When drunk he would
into trouble with his sex activities and give public scandal.
get
e was sent, therefore,..on various occasions to penal (sometimes
He
called ed mental) institutions in both Montreal, Canada, and in
uffs, Ia. During the years my classmate served time
Council Bl
institutions he was listed in the official Catholic Direc-
in penal
leave", without an address. According to his own
tory "on sick
testimony he was considered unfit for church work, but he was
allowed freedom if he would serve as "chaplain" for this Catholic
Institution. To appoint unfit or misbehaving priests as "chaplains"
of religious institutions is common practice in the Catholic
Church. The chaplain who preceded my classmate was a known
sex pervert, who also had served time, in Montreal, Canada.
One day, under the chaplaincy of my classmate, the police
82 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676%S03600070077-4
 brought to the nunnery a thirteen year old girl who was working tutions of this minority.
at a house of prostitution and had `lied' about her age. As there ent of a Protestant
nm
is hardly anything which will escape an alert police force, this
little girl was taken from this public house (the older girls con-
tinued their profession) and, according to my classmate, she was
placed in this nunnery for discipline or correction. This em-
barrassed the chaplain, because he was a steady patron of the
very house from which the girl had been taken. In the con-
fessional the girl begged her priest to help her to escape and
the chaplain came to me for advice. Knowing his background
and knowing that he did not have the support of any pressure
group, I warned him not to defy the Catholic Hierarchy and
City Hall singlehanded. I left Nebraska soon after this incident,
and not much later the chaplain, a Catholic priest, was found
shot. Now, anyone who maintains that the U. S. government
had a right around the year 1942 to investigate the dealings of
this nunnery with various courts and police departments, is
automatically excommunicated.
Numerous monasteries, never inspected by civil authorities,
violate the laws of the land. Some monasteries forbid embalming
and coffins, burying their inmates like dogs on the monastery
grounds. The monk in charge of the monastery's infirmary often
practices medicine without a license and causes many deaths
by waiting too long before getting an outside doctor. Irregulari-
ties in death certificates are rumored to be numerous. Inspection
of sanitary conditions, to which our smallest eating places are
subjected, are usually unheard of. Inspection of places and
persons, kept in solitary confinement, is considered heresy. In-
vestigation of nuns, monks and priests confined to penal or
mental institutions of the Roman Church (Council Bluffs, Ia.;
Oshkosh, Wis.; Scranton, Pa.; Miami, Fla.; etc.) is considered
so heretical that the mere mention of investigation is considered
libelous. The transportation of American priests to the penal
institutions of Canada (Montreal), especially when the crossing
of the national border involves American detectives and police
cars, certainly needs investigation regardless of papal anathemas.
As monasteries in Spain and Latin American countries have been
used to hide political criminals, to plan revolutions and to store
guns for the overthrow of the legal government, our national
security is at stake as long as we grant immunity to the insti-
It is the duty or a democratic gover
country to see to it that its citizens enjoy freedom of religion
and that no man, whether priest, monk or layman, can be put in
a penal or mental institution for the `crime' of turning Prot-
estant. Yet Art. 53 of the Syllabus condemns this governmental
protection. As our newspapers are deserting their duties of re-
porting `all' the news, they are aiding the undemocratic cause
of Catholic immunity. Even in cases of such famous and rich
personalities as the Dionne quintuplets, our newspapers failed
to report that one of them, Emilie, was scrubbing floors in an
institution where priests `on sick leave' were kept. Only after
her mysterious death, when the public demanded some explana-
tion, did our newspapers report that Emilie had talked her
sister, Marie, out of taking the vow of poverty in Montreal
(which might have cost the nunnery half a million dollars) ;
that the two fleeing girls were picked up by Montreal police
and handed over to the Cardinal; that Emilie had subsequently
been placed in an institution to become a nun according to one
report, and according to her own father she was there for a
rest (a millionaire scrubbing floors) ; that there was no one at
her bed side when she died; that she was not under doctor's care
and that the local doctor was not called till after her death;
that the local coroner was kept in the dark about her death
until the bigwigs in Montreal had given him instructions about
the death certificate; that the public was kept in the dark about
her death; and that a big shot from Montreal announced the
following day that she had died from epilepsy which the medical
profession of the U. S. openly denied. When our newspapers
refuse to report when a world famous girl enters a `nunnery',
what chances do American priests have to escape the penal in-
stitutions of Rome? Once in a great while the AP will report
that a priest is bringing a million dollar suit against his bishop
for trying to put him in a mental institution (as a case in
Lincoln, Neb.), or it will report that a priest shot and killed
his bishop for trying to lock him up (Rio de Janeiro, AP July 1,
1957), but our newspapers are afraid to carry these stories. The
UP released the story of a priest "murdering his 19-year-old
mistress" and "then used his knife to kill the child she was to
have," and "admitted affairs with other women" (Jan. 26, 1958),
84 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676&003600070077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
but few newspapers dared to print the..-fasts.; Thus,, by fear,
threats and anathemas our free press has disappeared and has
opened the way for American concentration camps immune from
inspection, if not by law, concordat or secret agreement, then at
least by practice.
A priest or monk who comes to disbelieve Roman Catholicism
and wishes to turn Protestant, is designated by Rome as an
"apostate". Rome claims the right to murder all apostates or to
lock them up for life. Not even a Protestant government may
interfere with her alleged divine rights. That is the meaning
of. Article. 53 of the-infallible Syllabus. If a priest or monk escapes,
businessmen may not give. him employment. In Italy employment
of, a priest is illegal: "Apostate priests or those incurring censure
cannot be employed in a teaching post, or any office or employ-
Tcent in which; they, have immediate, contact with the public"
(,Vatican Concordat with Mussolini, 1929). Here in the United
States it is easier for a man who served, 30 years' in Sing Sing
to find and hold a, job than it is for a man who served 30 years
as a priest in the Catholic Church.
54. Reges et principes non 54. Kings and rulers are not only
solum ab Ecclesiae juris- exempt from the jurisdiction of
dictione eximuntur, verum the Church,, but are superior to
etiam in quaestionibus juris- the Church in litigated questions
dictionis dirimendis superi- of jurisdiction.
ores sunt Ecclesia.
That kings and presidents ?of various countries are independent
from the supreme jurisdiction of the pope is here condemned
as a heresy of modernistic times. Hence the often repeated
falsehood that a Roman Catholic President would not be under
the power and jurisdiction of the pope in -matters other than
dogmas of faith (purgatory, sacraments, immaculate concep-
tion, etc.) is here exposed infallibly. Not only a Catholic Presi-
dent, but all Catholic governors, senators, mayors, attorneys,
down to the school teachers and clerks owe complete obedience
to the Roman hierarchy in all matters of public life, whether
theological, political or legal. Any Roman Catholic, who holds
an important office and disobeys his Church, is excommunicated,
deprived of eternal salvation and declared an outcast for whom
none of his fellowmen is allowed to cast another vote.
55. Ecclesia a Statu, Status- 55. The Church ought to be sep-
que ab Ecclesia sejungendus arated from the State, and the
est. State from the Church.
The pilgrims and early settlers came to these shores to escape
the religious persecutions of Europe. If they had believed in a
Union of Church and State they would have made the Protes-
tant faith the religion of the State. However, in order to guaran-
tee. full freedom of religion to the small minorities of Catholics,
Jews and others, and in.. order to set up a democratic govern-
ment free from outside pressure, our forefathers demanded sep-
aration of Church and State, made it the law of. the land, and
added the first amendment to the Constitution (1791). Since then
Rome has constantly condemned the American principle of
Separation .of Church and State.
According to Rome,. all earthly powers are subject to''the
Catholic Church, but. the Church is, independent of the earthly
powers, not only in matters of religion but in all fields. Writing
on education, Pope Pius XI decreed: "Both in the origin and in
the exercise of her mission as educator of the young, the Church
is independent of any earthly power, not merely in regard to
her lawful end and purpose, but also in regard to whatever
means she may deem suitable and necessary to attain them"
(Enc. "Divini illius magistri"). This pope's Secretary of State,
Cardinal Gaspari, said in South America: "The theory of those
who wish to separate religion from politics is erroneous and
pernicious" (Chile, June 17, 1922). While Rome demands out-
right union of Church and State, the North American hierarchy
usually softens the papal dogma by adding a jesuitical adjective
to it: "Complete separation of Church and State is to be con-
demned" (Jesuits' Fordham Univ. "Social Ethics", p. 92).
When Hitler, as the "secular arm of the Church" began his war
to restore the Holy Roman Empire, and Father Coughlin began
his campaign to drive the Jewish and Protestant money changers
out of business, Rome began to denounce more strongly the
separation of Church and State in democratic countries: "No
Catholic may positively and unconditionally approve of the
policy of separation of Church and State" (Monsignor O'Toole,
Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C., 1939).
During the war the hierarchy stepped up its propaganda. "Ro-
g6' Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B016769003600070077-4
 pprove or Release 2002/
man Catholic theories of the church and state," warned Metho-
dist Bishop Oxnam, "lead logically to a subservient state dominat-
ed by an absolute church" (St. Louis Globe-Democrat, Oct. 29,
1945). After the war the American hierarchy continued to de-
nounce this American principle, as it stands in the way of the
Catholic design to obtain public funds for its religious institu-
tions. While the Supreme Court ruled that "The First Amend-
ment has erected a wall between church and state" (N. J. School
Bus decision, Feb., 1947), Pope Pius XII, without the use of
limitative adjectives, denounced the American principle in 1947,
but our newspapers were afraid to headline it. A foreign
language paper in New York dared to come out with a blunt
German headline: "Church and State inseparable" and reported:
"Vatican City, Oct. 30. Pope Pius declared today . . . that the
Church cannot be separated from the state" (N. Y. Staats-Herold,
Oct. 31, 1947). The Jesuits denounced the American principle
as "that negative, ill-defined, basically un-American formula,
with all its overtones of religious prejudice" ("America", Feb.
15,1947 ).
Like all members of the American hierarchy, Cardinal Richard
J. Cushing of Boston denounced the American principle of
Separation of Church. In early 1947, for example, Cushing was
quoted by the N. Y. Times as saying: "The extreme develop-
ment of the idea of separation of the Church and State is
`fantastic and un-American' " (Jan. 14, 1947). In 1949 Cardinal
Spellman and Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt locked horns on the same
question. When the latter upheld the Supreme Court piling
on the school issue, the Cardinal thought that he was powerful
enough to destroy the former `first lady of the land' by jesuitical
character assassination and publicly accused her of discrimi-
nations "unworthy of an American mother." By daring to defend
our Constitution we are in danger of becoming the victim of a
jesuit smear campaign and of their well-known tactics of name-
calling, like anti-Catholic, bigot, atheist, communist. In 1952,
when the hierarchy became so outspoken on this issue, Methodist
Bishop Oxnam thought it necessary to warn the American
citizen once more not to permit the Roman Church "to get its
prehensile hands in the public treasury."
In 1958, when the hierarchy began its all-out campaign to
push Senator John F. Kennedy of Boston for the presidential
nomination of 1960, it suddenly changed its previous policies
and attacks in order to lull the public into a false sense of
security. Cardinal Cushing, who is Kennedy's bishop and who
is pictured in Look magazine receiving a check of more than
a million dollars from the Kennedys (Look, March 3, 1959),
seems now temporarily cured of his former un-American utter-
ances. The Los Angeles diocese reports that "Archbishop
Richard J. Cushing of Boston said here that he had `never met
an ecclesiastical leader who desired union of Church and State
in this country" (L. A. Tidings, May 23, 1958 ).
Senator Kennedy, according to Look magazine, has said:
"I believe as a senator that the separation of Church and State
is fundamental to our American concept and heritage and should
remain so . . . The first Amendment to the Constitution is an
infinitely wise one" (Look, Mar. 3, 1959; AP Feb. 16, 1959) . As
the end justifies the means, Kennedy may say anything. We
notice at once his autobisection: "as a senator", leaving room
for opposite views. Governor Alfred E. Smith in 1927 made a
similar statement: "I believe in the absolute separation of Church
and State," but he pointed out: "I am only a layman ... I am
neither a lawyer nor a theologian" (Atlantic Monthly, April,
1927, vol. 139, p. 721).
The American public is thought to be gullible enough to
believe that Senator Kennedy, who has rubbed elbows with the
hierarchy from childhood, has no faith in the infallible teachings
of his church. Once elected, a President Kennedy could claim
that he had been misquoted, that the reasons for his former
stand no longer exist, that he has changed his views like so
many other presidents, or that at the time he was not aware of
the fact that his personal views were contrary to those of Rome.
We can feel sure that both the `Creed of Al Smith' and the
Creed of Jack Kennedy were drawn up by the hierarchy, i.e.,
by the Jesuits themselves.
That Kennedy's view is contrary to Roman theology is ad-
mitted everywhere. A famous Jesuit, Rev. Virgil C. Blum, of
Marquette University, an expert in political science, told a small
audience in Omaha: "It seems somewhat strange to see a Boston
Catholic in the `strict separation' camp, usually occupied almost
exclusively by Protestants and Other Americans United for
Separation of Church and State and its adherents" (Providence
Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R~~3600070077-4
88
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B
Visitor, Feb. 26, 1959). The Jesuit political scientist is barking
up the wrong tree. He must know the address of Kennedy's
bishop and of his pope. Why not expose the `heretic' to them?
His remarks are only meant to help Kennedy tear up his cam-
paign promises, once elected. The same opposition against
Kennedy's views were echoed by the Fathers of Notre Dame:
"Assuming that many readers will mistakenly take this to be an
official Catholic position on the problem involved ... in our
opinion such thinking contains a serious flaw ... No man may
rightfully act against his conscience ... It is dangerous because
it leads to secularism in public life. It is the political version
of the belief that religion has nothing to say about the conduct
of economic affairs. That you can separate your private religious
convicitions from everyday life" ("Ave Maria," Cath. weekly,
Notre Dame, March 7, 1959). The diocesan paper of Providence,
R. I., also attacked Kennedy's view which "seems to have
pleased the POAU ... more than Catholic opinion" (Providence,
AP 2-27-59). Every Catholic paper seemed to rap Kennedy,
except the paper which one would expect to expose the `heretic',
the Catholic paper of Boston. "Richard Cardinal Cushing said
today: `It is certainly ridiculous to suggest Sen. John F. Kennedy
(D. Mass) might not be able to fulfill his oath of office because
he is a Catholic. It's a great pity that questions about Kennedy's
religion have to be answered at all" (Boston, AP, March 9, 1959) .
It is useless to ask Kennedy what he would do if he ever
would find out that his personal views were heretical and that
he had incurred excommunication. Why should voters risk the
safety of their country when there are hundreds of candidates
whose loyalties are beyond question? How can we trust a man
who claims not to believe in the doctrines of his own church and
yet is a friend of the top officials of that church? Even if
Kennedy took an oath that in case of a papal excommunication
he would rather renounce his allegiance to Rome than to the
United States, he would remain a security risk. We have a
thousand years of Roman history: Rome never changes in her
political designs. We must remember that neither Kennedy, nor
Cardinal Cushing is authorized to define Catholic doctrine.
Only the pope of Rome can speak authoritatively and infallibly.
As long as he remains purposely silent, and refuses to annul
the papal Bulls of his predecessors, we are just asking for
trouble when we vote the presidency of a non-Catholic country
(80%) into the hands of a papal subject.
Pope Leo XIII warned the American bishops against the heret-
ical or schismatic view that Separation of Church and State
is only condemned in Europe, but may be tolerated in America,
"for it raises the suspicion that there are those among you who
conceive and desire a Church in America different from that
which is in the rest of the world" (Pope Leo XIII, "Catholicity
in the United States", 1899). Rome fears man more than God.
It is not guided by principles, but changes its political and
religious views whenever expedient. For example, the hierarchy
of Hungary, under Communist rule, now pretends to believe
in Separation of Church and State. We would be foolish to trust
a Roman Catholic candidate in the United States who is so am-
bitious that he publicly renounces the infallible teachings of
his church for temporary expedience.
"Keep the Church and State separate"-President Ulysses S.
Grant (1868).
60. Auctoritas nihil aliud 60. Authority is nothing else but
est nisi numeri ... summa. numerical superiority .. .
Article 60 condemns democracy itself as a heresy in which
no Roman Catholic may believe. According to Rome, demo-
cratic rule is not of God, because it is a rule by the mob, an
authority vested in the people themselves and measured by
votes.
In his encyclical on human liberty, the same Pope Leo XIII
remarks that "it is not wrong per se to prefer a democratic
form of government, if only the Catholic doctrine be main-
tained as to the origin and exercise of power." This kind of
double talk is more nonsensical than if he had said: Atheism
is not wrong per se as long as it recognizes the pope as the
supreme representative of God on earth.
Before the U. S. entered World War II (Dec. 7, 1941), when
Father Coughlin was still preaching his fascist attacks against
Protestant and Jewish individuals, the American Jesuits publicly
attacked our form of government, identified democracy with
Protestantism, and preached that such a government was not
worthwhile to preserve or to fight for. Father Coughlin had
predicted in 1939 "the end of democracy in America" (Social
g0 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R0903 600070077-4
 Justice, Sept. 1, 1939), and by 1941 the Jesuits were so sure of a
German victory that they began to reveal their real feeling
towards our doomed form of government: "How we Catholics
have loathed and despised this Lucifer civilization . . . Today
American Catholics are being asked to shed their blood for that
particular kind of secularist civilization which they have been
heroically repudiating for four centuries. This civilization is now
called democracy, and the suggestion is being made that we send
the Yanks to Europe again to defend it. In reality, is it worth
defending?" ("America", a Jesuit weekly, May 17, 1941, p.
145-146). Throughout the wac we find that the Catholic hier-
archy identified Democracy with Protestantism, and Protes-
tantism with Atheism. As if totalitarian Fascism can be called
a Catholic form of democracy, the American Catholics were
told: "Democracy has never meant in Latin countries what it
means over here, and enemies of religion know that Democracy
has meant control of the Government by irreligious forces" (Our
Sunday Visitor, national Catholic paper, June 6, 1943). By papal
bulls Rome has explained over and over that only the pope can
define what is right and what is wrong, and that it is blasphemy
to leave such matters to the votes of the people. Bishop Sheen
explained this Catholic view on his radio hours. Protestantism
and its alleged offshoots of democracy, liberalism and material-
ism, are openly denounced as errors; and as error is wrong,
neither democracy nor Protestantism has any rights. The Italian
Jesuits explained it in their monthly as follows: "The Roman
Catholic Church . . . must demand the right to freedom for
herself alone, because such a right can only be possessed by
truth, never by error" (Civilta Cattolica, April, 1948).
67. Jure naturae matrimonii 67. By the law of nature the bond
vinculum non est indisso- of matrimony is not indissoluble,
lubile, et in variis casibus and in various cases a so-called
divortium proprie dictum divorce may be granted by civil
auctoritate civili sanciri po- authorities.
test.
of polygamy of the Mormons. In the same manner Roman
Catholic practices which are contrary to civil law ought to be
abolished.
Christ allowed divorce in case of adultery (Matt. 19:9); the
Ecumenical Church, of which the Roman Church was a member
from 325 to 1054, allowed divorce in case of adultery; the Greek
Orthodox Church, the oldest Christian church on earth, still
allows divorce in case of adultery; all Protestant churches allow
divorce for the same reason, while people of other beliefs hold
that divorce ought to be granted in any case of incompatibility.
Knowing that divorce destroys common family life and de-
creases the number of children, Rome today forbids divorce
even where Christ allowed it. To accommodate the friends of
the hierarchy, Rome has invented 30 grounds for annulment, a
divorce in effect. Rudy Vallee, for example, had his three
previous marriages `annulled' by Rome and married his fourth
wife in the Catholic church. It is the intention of the Roman
hierarchy to make civil divorces of ex-Catholics and non-Catho-
lics impossible by forbidding Catholic judges to grant them.
Anyone who holds that the American courts are allowed to
grant a divorce in specific cases is excommunicated from the
Roman faith.
71. Tridentini forma sub in-
firmitatis poena non obli-
gat, ubi lex civilis aliam for-
mat praestituat, et velit hac
nova forma interveniente
matrimonium valere.
73. Vi contractus mere ci-
vilis potest inter Christianos
constare veri nominis matri-
monium; ...
71. The form (of solemnizing
marriage) laid down by the
Council of Trent under penalty of
nullity is not binding in cases
where the civil law has pre-
scribed another form and where
it holds that marriage is validly
contracted by this new form.
73. A mere civil contract may
constitute a true marriage among
Christians; ...
No religion, least of all a minority, has the right to force her Marriage is no peculiarity of christianity; it is older than
particular beliefs on others. Only when a certain religious christianity. Neither the Bible nor the early Church looked
practice is contrary to the law of the land will the U. S. interfere upon marriage as a religious or sacred rite. Pope Callistus
and uphold national law above ecclesiastical law, as in the case (3rd cent.) allowed society ladies to have intercourse with a
Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R00 00070077-4
 pproved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
slave without the benefit of wedlock, he allowed the ladies
to use contraceptives and drugs to produce sterility, thus
"advocating adultery and murder" (Migne, P. G., vol. 16, part
3, p. 3388). Emperor Charlemagne (814) was the first to insist
on a church blessing, but this ceremony was not a sacrament
(Migne, P. L. 112, 1169; 121, 146; 183, 271). Not until Rome
made marriage a Sacrament (12th and 13th centuries) were
slaves admitted to church weddings. For 12 centuries Christian
Rome not only had slavery but forced her christian slaves
to live in concubinage. A local church with such primitive
theology now claims to be infallible and to be divinely guided
in matters of matrimony. Actually Rome made marriage a
sacrament in order to control the private lives of the people from
the cradle to the grave, and to control the private lives of the
secular rulers. Rome now teaches that Christ Himself instituted
the sacrament of matrimony, and that consequently no civil
powers may interfere with her divine rights.
The American Catholic hierarchy holds, for example, that
every baptized Lutheran who married an unbaptized Baptist in
a Protestant church, is living in adultery and his children are
illegitimate. Rome seeks to force legislation to prevent such
and other marriages.
In Spain civil marriages are forbidden to those who were once
baptized by the Spanish church. As nearly all Spanish Protes-
tants are converts from Catholicism, they can neither marry in
court nor in church, unless they forsake their Protestant `heresy'.
Similar conditions exist in Italy. When an ex-Catholic lady re-
cently married before a judge, Bishop Pietro Fiordelli denounced
the couple as "public sinners", and he called the lady "a harlot
and a concubine" unfit for christian burial. When the couple
brought suit against the bishop, the pope howled holy murder,
but the world was little impressed by his intolerance. Catholic
Italy, therefore, has farther advanced in shaking off the Roman
yoke than Protestant America.
76. Abrogatio civilis imperii, 76. The abolition of temporal
quo Apostolica Sedes poti- power, which the Apostolic See
tur, ad Ecclesiae libertatem possesses, would contribute great-
felicitatemque vel maxime ly to the liberty and prosperity of
conduceret. the Church.
Praeter has errores ex-
plicite notatos, all complu-
res implicite reprobantur,
proposita et asserta doctri-
na, quam Catholici omnes
firmissime retinere debeant,
de civil! Romani Pontificis
principatu.
This article not only states plainly that this papal Bull is
binding to all Roman Catholics, but it further reveals the fact
that only part of papal instructions are put in writing while
particular instructions for certain countries are delivered orally
to the bishops and executed in secret.
77. Aetate hac nostra non 77. In this our day it is no longer
amplius expedit, religionem expedient to hold the Catholic
Catholicam haberi tamquam religion as the only religion of
unicam Status religionem, the State, excluding all other re-
ceteris quibuscumque cultis ligions.
exclusis.
78. Hinc laudabiliter in qui- 78. Hence it has been wisely pro-
busdam Catholici nominis vided by law in some countries
regionibus lege cautum est, called Catholic, that persons who
ut hominibus illuc immi- immigrate to these countries shall
grantibus liceat publicum enjoy the public exercise of their
proprii cujusque cultus exer- own religion.
citium habere.
Conquered Italy, while occupied by American troops, removed
the church signs from Protestant churches. Protestant employees
of the American embassy in Spain may worship in private but
may not announce their services publicly nor erect a public
building of Protestant worship. The Spanish Charter of July 17,
1945, Art. 6, reads: "The Catholic religion, which is the religion
of the State, has official protection . . . Open-air ceremonies
or demonstrations other than those of the Catholic religion,
shall not be tolerated." Uncle Sam not only respects these laws
of Protestant persecution, but lavishes billions of Protestant
dollars on these totalitarian dictators. According to the unani-
mous reports of American ministers who visited Russia and
Besides these errors, explicitly
noted, many others are implicitly
condemned by the proposed and
asserted doctrine, WHICH ALL
CATHOLICS ARE BOUND TO
HOLD MOST FIRMLY, concern-
ing the temporal sovereignty of
the Roman Pontiff.
94 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R009V00070077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
Spain, there is more religious freedom in Communistic Russia
than in Catholic Spain.
79. Enimvero falsum est, ci- 79. Furthermore it is false that
vilem cujusque cultus liber- the State's granting of freedom
tatem ... conducere ad po- to all religions . . . leads more
pulorum mores animosque easily to the corruption of the
facilius corrumpendos ac morals and souls of the people
indifferentismi pestem pro- and to the propagation of the
pagandam. pest of indifferentism.
Modern history has proved that State religions do not prosper
like free religions. The United States, which allows Catholics
and Protestants, Jews and Mohammedans, to immigrate and
to worship God as they see fit, has its churches crowded,
while Catholic Italy has nothing but empty churches and
millions of anti-religious communists. Nowhere in the world
has the Catholic church prospered as in the United States. Yet,
American Catholics are forbidden under penalty of hell to
uphold the American Constitution which proclaims freedom of
religion to all.
"Individual liberty in reality is only a deadly anarchy" (Pope
Pius XII, April 6,1951) .
"Freedom of thought, therefore, does not mean the liberty to
think as one pleases . . . Freedom of thought means the liberty
to think the (Catholic) truth" (The Tablet, diocesan paper of
Brooklyn, N. Y., Feb. 22,1958).
LINCOLN'S ASSASSINATION, 1865
The un-American, anti-democratic hate-Bull of Pope Pius IX
was published during the last month of 1864 (Dec. 8) and
copies were mailed to all bishops who ordered their priests to
preach against our American principles. President Abraham
Lincoln, elected in 1860 and re-elected in 1864 because of his
stand against slavery, had become the symbol and champion
of democracy so detested by the Jesuits. As the Jesuits hold
that one can bribe or intimidate any ruler and that it is im-
possible to bribe the people, Rome has always opposed the
democratic idea of granting liberty and self-government to
all. International jesuitry sided with the South during the
Civil War, as this is evident from the apostolic letter of Pope
Pius to the President of the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis
("Illustrious and Honorable President"). Contemporary authors,
like Rev. Chiniqui and Dr. Fulton?), quote Abraham Lincoln
as follows: "From the beginning of the war there has been, not
a secret, but a public alliance between the Pope of Rome and
Jefferson Davis ... The Pope and his Jesuits have advised. and
directed Jefferson Davis on the land, from the first shot at Fort
Sumter." Lincoln's life had been threatened from the time of his
Emancipation Proclamation to liberate the Negro slave (Jan. 1,
1863) , . and the new papal Bull (Dec. 8, 1864) pointed at
Lincoln as the greatest heretic of this era. Lincoln wrote to a
friend: "The Jesuits are so expert in their deeds of blood, that
Henry IV said it was impossible to escape them ... My escape
from their hands, since the letter of the Pope to Jefferson Davis
has sharpened a million daggers, is more than a miracle."
On Good Friday, April 14, 1865, Abraham Lincoln was shot
by John Wilkes Booth. From the testimonies given at the trial
of Lincoln's assassins, published by Benn Pitman?, it is clear
that the plot was directed by the Vatican which used a drunken
fanatic to execute it. Headquarters of the plot was the house
of Roman Catholic Mrs. Mary E. Surrat, 561 H Street, Washing-
ton, D. C. This house was a gathering place of Father Lehiman,
Father Wiget and many other priests. Mr. Booth, who had a
fanatic hatred for Lincoln, was easily persuaded that the assassi-
nation of such a man was not murder but a service to God and
mankind. Mrs. Surratt was found guilty at the trial and she was
hanged as an accomplice to Lincoln's murder. Mr. Booth fled
to the barn of Mr. Garrett, a Roman Catholic. Mr. Lloyd, a
Roman Catholic, was in possession of Booth's gun. Dr. Samuel
A. Mudd, a Roman Catholic doctor who set the leg of the
fleeing murderer, was sentenced to life imprisonment.
Thus the greatest champion of democracy (who gave us the
definition of democracy: "for, by, and of the people"), the
greatest citizen of the U. S. who towered over his fellowmen
*) Rev. Charles Chiniqui (former priest and friend of Lincoln), Fifty
years in the Church of Rome, New York, Revell, 1928. Rev. Justin Fulton,
Washington in the Lap of Rome, 1888. Benn Pitman (court reporter),
The Assassination of President Lincoln, New York, Funk & Wagnalls, 1954.
96 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003%'60070077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
both physically (6 ft. 4 ins.) and morally, became the first
victim of the anti-democratic Bull and was shot in the back
in Washington, D. C.
History can and will repeat, for Rome still teaches that she
has the divine right to murder any Protestant and that she will
destroy any heretic if his death would greatly benefit her
church. Thus, in a case where..our President would be a Protes-
tant (heretic) and our Vice-President a Roman Catholic, Rome
could give an assassin not only. permission to commit murder,
but a plenary indulgence from all his sins for giving this country
its first Roman Catholic President. -
POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE CHURCH
Before Christianity all religions were national, and Church
and State were united in such 'a way that the secular ruler
was the Supreme .Pontiff of religion with the right to appoint
the highpriests of religion. This was also the case in the Hebrew
religion. Because Christianity became an international religion,
its clergy gradually demanded Separation of Church and State.
During the first 300 years Christianity was illegal and had
no international organization or administration. During the
era of the Ecumenical Church (A. D. 325-1054) the Eastern
Emperor held ex officio the title of Supreme Pontiff and had
the right to appoint bishops and to convoke councils. After the
final Schism (1054) the Western Church (Roman Catholic
Church) gradually succeeded not only in wresting from the
Western Emperor his ancient rights of appointing bishops and
convoking councils, but in taking the secular title of Supreme
Pontiff for itself, thus subjecting State and Emperor alike
to the Church.
"It is a fundamental human right, a privilege of nature, that
every man should worship according to his convictions. It is
certainly no part of religion to spread itself by force. It must
he embraced freely, and not be imposed" (Migne, P. L. vol.
1, p. 777). These words did not come from the pen of Thomas
Paine (d. 1809), but from Bishop Tertullian (d. 230), the very
first Latin Father of the Church.
"Each of us should bring forward what we think, judging no
man nor rejecting anyone. from the right of fellowship, if he
should think differently from ' us. For neither does . anyone. of
us set, himself up as a `Bishop .of bishops', nor. does anyone.,by
"totalitarian methods compel his fellow-bishops to the necessity
of obedience, because every bishop (pastor), according to the
allowance of his liberty and power, has his own proper right of
judgment, and can no more be judged by another than he
himself can judge another" (Migne, P. L. 3; 1092 ). "For neither
did Peter arrogantly assume anything to himself, so as to
say that"he held a `primacy' (primatum)" (Migne, P.L. 4, 423).
These words came from St. Cyprian (d. 258), the greatest
Latin - Father. of the. 3rd century, who' unsuccessfully sought to
unite all national 'churches into one visible church (Cyprian,
"On the Unity of the Church").
Pagan Emperor Constantine (d. 337) granted freedom, of re-
ligion to all Christians: "We, Constantine ... decided that .. .
Christians and all "others should have freedom to follow the kind
of religion they favored:. .. that each should have freedom to
worship God after 'his 'own choice" (Migne, P.L. 7, 267-268).
Later, when the Emperor turned `Christian', he and his spiritual
adviser, Bishop 'Hosius of Spain, founded . the Ecumenical or
Catholic Church- and convoked its . first council (325),
"Do not interfere in matters ecclesiastical, nor give orders
on such questions, but rather learn about them from- us. For
,into your hands God, has placed the Kingdom, but the affairs
of his Church He has committed to us" (Migne, P.G. 25, 746).
.These words, demanding separation of Church and State, did
not come from the pen of Dr. Glenn L. Archer (P.O.A.U.),
but from the first President of the Catholic Church, Bishop
Hosius, who. addressed them to the Emperor.
Gelasius (d: 496), Bishop of Rome and most ardent supporter
of Ecumenicalism, sought separation of Church and State. He
wrote to the Emperor that the bishops of religion should settle
religious affairs even. as' "the imperial power has been- bestowed
upon you by Divine Providence, the priests of religion obey
your laws" (Migne, P. L. 59, 42). Not even the first Western
Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Charlemagne (d. 814),
granted this independence to the bishop of Rome. When
secular rulers foolishly granted the Church independence from
the State (Concordat of Worms, 1122), the State lost its inde-
pendence from the Church. .
98 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003J0070077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
CORRUPTION OF THE PAPACY
When the bishops of Rome became secular rulers (p. 45),
especially after the first Schism of East and West (867), they
forsook the teachings of christianity and sought only power and
wealth. Pope Formosus (891), who had been excommunicated
by Pope John VIII, had the latter murdered and made a deal
with the ambitious Arnulf to run the empire together. All subjects
had to swear the sacred oath: "I swear by these Holy Mysteries
that, saving my honor, my law, and the fidelity I owe to my
lord, the Pope Formosus, I both am and will be faithful all my
life to the Emperor Arnulf" (Annales Bertiniani, A.D. 895; Mura-
tori, R.I.S., vol. 2, part 1, p. 574).
A Roman prostitute, Theodora, demanded the embraces of
Bishop John of Ravenna, whom she made bishop of Rome
(Pope John X, 914). When the pope quarreled with his concu-
bine's daughter, she strangled him (Migne, P.L. 136, 852). Pope
Sergius lived with the "whore" Marozia, who made her illegiti-
mate son Pope John XI (Liber Pontificalis, vol. 2, p. 243). The
Venerable Italian Cardinal Baronius (d. 1607) writes in his
Church Annals under A. D. 931: "They elected to pope the very
son of Marozia, named John, whom the same whore bore to
Pope Sergius" (Baronius vol. 15, p. 639).
Cardinal Baronius calls this era of the papacy: "the reign
of the whores". But the popes were no worse than their prede-
cessors. Baronius quotes Genebrard to describe the popes of A.D.
752 to 901: "This century is unfortunate, as for nearly 150 years
the popes have fallen from all virtues of their predecessors,
and have become Apostates rather than Apostles." Thus he
explodes the fable that there were just a "few bad popes". He
describes these popes: "What a shame, what a pity. What
monsters, horrible to behold . . . What evils did they not
perpetrate, what tragedies did they not cause? With what im-
purities was this See . . . then stained; with what rotteness
infected; with what filth defiled; and by these things blackened
with perpetual infamy" (Baronius 15, 501). "And what sort of
Cardinal Priests and Deacons were chosen by these monsters",
asks Baronius (15, 572). The Catholic Encyclopedia answers
that question: "The episcopal sees ... were treated as property
which descended by hereditary right from father to son ..not
only priests but bishops openly took wives and begot children
to whom they transmitted their benefices" (C. E. 3, 485).
What the greatest Catholic scholar, Monsignor Duchesne, says
of these popes has never been said of the era of Al Capone or
the Mafia: "The Lateran became a resort of persons of ill fame,
and no virtuous woman could remain in safety at Rome"
(Duchesne, "Beginnings of the Temporal Sovereignty of the
Popes, A.D. 754 to 1073," 1908 ed., p. 224).
In order not to be accused of "smearing" the papacy, we
will refrain from quoting Catholic scholars and quote directly
from the Vatican Archives. Pope John XII (d. 964) "spent his
entire life in adultery" (Liber Pontificalis, vol. 2, p. 246). The
people of Rome cried out: "The Lateran Palace, which once
was the meeting place of the saints, is now a public whore
house" (Migne, P. L. 136, 900). The Roman Council (963)
found the pope guilty of adultery "with the widow of Reynard,
and with Stephanie, his father's concubine, and with the widow
Anna, with his own grand-daughter, and he turned the Holy
Palace into a brothel and whore house" (Mani, Conc., vol.
17A, p. 466). "Pope John . . . while he was enjoying himself
with the wife of another man, was struck dead by the Devil"
(Migne, P. L. 136, 908).
Pope John XV (996) distributed all the wealth of the church
among his relatives (Liber Pont. 2, 260), and was "covetous
of filthy lucre and venal in all his acts" (Muratori, Annali, 5,
498). Pope Benedict IX, who was a boy of ten when he became
pope (Rudolph Glaber in Migne, P.L. 142, 679), sold the papacy
in order to marry. He still claimed to be pope during the schism
(1054). "His life," writes Pope Victor III, "was so evil, so
horrible, and so execrable, that I shudder to describe it" (Migne,
P. L. 149, 1003). "He neither feared the Lord, nor respected
his fellowman" (Migne, P. L. 150, 817).
A descendant of the whore Marozia, Countess Mathilda of
Tuscany, made the monk Hildebrand pope of the entire West
(Pope Gregory VII). He was the first Roman bishop to claim
the sole title of Pope and Supreme Pontiff, but the bishops
of the West dethroned him at the Council of Worms in 1076
(Monumenta Germ. Hist., Leges, vol. 2, p. 44). Slowly, country
by country, the popes of Rome became the rulers of the West
(see p. 54).
100 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R00M00070077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
Pope Boniface VIII (1300) invented :the Jubilee Indulgence
and wrote . the famous ..Bull. "Unam sanctam," thus officially
establishing the Roman, Church. as the only true. church. Yet
he was an outspoken atheist, a -murderer and. sex pervert. Both
at the Council of Paris and at the Italian Council. convoked by
Pope Clement V, Pope' Boniface was found guilty and condemn-
ed. At his trials, recorded in both Italian and- French,government
documents, dozens of clerics and monks, testified under oath
that the pope had murdered his predecessor and many of his
priests, that he denied the existence of life after death, that
he held that "the three religions (Jewish, Christian and Mo-
hammedan) . . are human inventions", that, ;Christ was a
"hypocrite" and "a man like us", and that he constantly said:
"to enjoy oneself and to lie. carnally with women or, with boys
is no more a sin. than rubbing. one's hands together" (Pierre
Dupuy, "Preuves de l'histoire, du di f f erend . . .,", Paris, 1655,
p. 541; Bishop He f ele, History, of the councils, bk 40, art. 697).
Driven out of Rome, Pope Boniface committed suicide (Villani,
Historie, bk 8, . ehapt. 63; Muratori, R. I. S. vol.. 13, p. 397).
This. convicted murderer,. atheist and sex pervert is the first
Roman bishop to decree: "We declare, state, define and pro-
nounce that it is altogether necessary to, salvation for every
human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff" (Bull
"Unam Sanctam," 1302; Bullarium Romanum, .vol. 3, part 2,
p. 94; Mirbt, No. 372). His successors became bolder in claiming
that "We hold the place of God on earth," but they also grew
more immoral than their predecessors. Their immoral lives have
been condemned by all the saints of the Middle Ages, and
their immorality is admitted by Catholic professors like Alzog
and Pastor.
Pope John XXIII (not to be confused with the one elected
in 1958) was held to be the "true" pope by the Council of
Constance (1415), but, because of his great immorality, this
pope. was officially and infallibly dethroned. His personal bio-
grapher, Theodoric a Niem, informs us that John XXIII raped
200 women. We will stick to the official Vatican records: "His
Lordship, Pope John, committed perversity with the wife of his
brother, incest with Holy Nuns, intercourse with Virgins, adul-
tery with the married, and all sorts of sex crimes ... wholly given
to sleep and other carnal desires, totally adverse to the life and
teachings of Christ .. . among the faithful of Christ, who knew
his life and character, he was publicly called the DEVIL IN-
CARNATE" (Council of Constance, Session 10; Mansi 27, 663).
The Diet of Frankfort (1457) describes in detail the crimes
of Pope Callistus III. When the immoral Franciscan monk,
Pope Sixtus IV (d. 1484) -who had made his illegitimate sons
cardinals and who invented the application of indulgences
to the souls in purgatory-passed away from this life, the Roman
newspaper said: "Today has God delivered his people from
the power of this, unjust: man, who, destitute alike of the fear
of God and of the love of his .fellowmen, sought only the
gratification of his avarice and ambition". (John Alzog, Univer-
sal Church History, .vol.. 2; p: 903). The same Catholic pro-
fessor speaks of the children of.. Pope Innocent, VIII, and of
his papal successors.
Pope Alexander VI (d. 1503) had six illegitimate children,
five by the twice divorced Countess Vanozza de Catanei,
and one by the blond teenager, Giulia Farnese. His daughter,
Lucretia, lived with 'him, in the Vatican. Bishop John Burchard,
who wrote the rubrics for the. modern Mass and who was the
official recorder' of papal deeds, who lived in the Vatican and
who was paid by the pope for writing it, recorded the life story
of Pope Alexander, day by day. This bishop describes, for
example, the intercourse party the pope staged in the Vatican
on Oct. 31, 1501. The fifty ladies invited for dinner, later
danced and played games in the total nude. The pope and his
illegitimate daughter, Lucretia, personally awarded prizes to
the nudists and later staged an intercourse contest, personally
awarding the prize to the male guest who managed to have
the greatest number of sexual intercourse with the ladies
("pluries dictas meretrices carnaliter agnoscerent"). One hun-
dred persons at a time were engaged in fornication, right in
the Apostolic Palace, publicly exhibited ("in aula publice car-
naliter tractatae") (Bishop John Burchard, "Diarium," Paris,
1885; vol. 3, p. 167).
His successor, Pope Julius II (d. 1513) had three known
illegitimate children (Pastor, vol. 5, p. 369), and the Reformation
Pope, Leo X, was ordained at the age of seven and created
a cardinal at the age of thirteen. We cannot give a full history
of the popes, but we have given you a sample of what popes are
102 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R008 10070077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
made of. Their murders and sins, enumerated by Catholic
authors, are such that we are convinced that, though they have
the same names as our Mafia, they were morally far worse.
Ordinarily a voter is not interested in the immoral lives of
religious leaders; but when certain leaders claim divine rights
in the United States and hold 25 to 35 million American
citizens in spiritual and mental bondage, we have a right to
explain the papacy to our fellow citizens before they vote this
papacy into power.
"Feed the flock of God . . . not by being lords over God's
people, but by being examples to the flock" (Peter, I. 5:2).
"No one should be so foolish as to believe that it is the
serious opinion of the pope and of all his Romanists and flatterers
that his great power is of divine right" (Martin Luther).
WHAT HAS THE PAPACY CONTRIBUTED
TO THE CAUSE OF LABOR?
What the papacy has contributed to the advancement of
science, the emancipation of slaves, the emancipation of wo-
men, the cause of democracy, of freedom, of tolerance and of
civilization in general, can be written down on one page.
Neither has it done anything for labor. The papal encyclical
"Rerum novarum" was actually anti-labor. When Rome knew
that the labor movement could not be stopped, it began to form
`Catholic labor parties' to break the movement into religious
divisions. Who controls labor, controls the country.
According to an article on the Jesuits in the Saturday Evening
Post: "In the United States, labor relations now rank with the
Jesuits' prime interests. The order operates a string of labor
schools across the country, Jesuit specialists have sat on many
arbitration boards, and Jesuit priests, working directly with
the unions, are now a common sight on many a tough water
front" (Sat. Eve. Post, Jan. 17, 1959, p. 51). By infiltration and
merger the Jesuits succeeded in `taming' labor in a country
which is 80% non-Catholic. Naturally, some Protestant industri-
alists are the Jesuits' staunchest supporters. The Kennedys of
Boston have been especially trained to cope with labor. While
Robert Kennedy conducts the Congressional Committee of in-
vestigation in labor racketeering, John Kennedy is writing labor
bills: "Sen. John F. Kennedy (D.-Mass) today unveiled a new
labor-management control bill . . . `which would virtually put
Mr. Hoffa and his associates out of business"' (Washington, AP,
Jan. 20, 1959). Congressional Inquisitions often do not seek the
criminal of a known crime, but at great government expense
seek to pin a crime on a predetermined `criminal'. Should the
victim be without sin, his repuation has been ruined by impli-
cation, and he still can be put away, either for perjury or for
contempt of Congress.
In his labor encyclical, Pope Leo XIII decreed: "Let it be
laid down, in the first place, that humanity must remain as it, is
. . . unequal fortune as a result of inequality in condition"
("Rerum novarum"). The Jesuits, who wrote this papal encyclical,
also interpreted its meaning: "It is not desirable that the
workers in a State become part of the brain cell of its govern-
ment. For the same reasons the cellular groups of different
races cannot be allowed to mix in with one other" (Jesuit
Father Muckermann, "Volktum, Staat and Nation, p. 37). Such
is the papal and jesuitical wisdom in matters of labor and race
relations. The same philosophy is peddled by the lay-Jesuits in
every field.
Westbrook Pegler quoted Pope Pius XII and Bishop Sheen to
warn this nation against the danger of organized labor, and of
the masses (mob) in general: "Pope Pius XII said that there
was danger in `the overwhelming strength of organized masses'
... Fulton J. Sheen ... said that all the good in the world now
was threatened by 'the masses' " (N. Y. Journal American, July
18, 1945) .
It is more than a coincidence that the United States has no
`Catholic' Labor Party, and that our Secretary of Labor, James
P. Mitchell, is a Catholic who, like Senator Kennedy, Governor
Brown, etc., is seeking the presidential nomination.
Jesuit-ridden Argentina controls labor by drafting any would-
be striker into the army and by declaring any dodger a traitor
to be shot before a firing squad. "Buenos Aires (AP) Jan. 20,
1959. The government's order drafting transport workers into
the army appeared today to have broken the backbone of a
nationwide strike against President Arturo Frondizi." While
his country was on strike against the dictator who had over-
thrown the legal government by force, Frondizi flew to the
104 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R00360Q?80077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
United States for financial aid to suppress the uprising. Rome
considers any labor movement and any movement towards
nationalism, independence and democracy as being Communist-
inspired. Capitalistic America, instead of welcoming new de-
mocracies, is siding with the Jesuits, is destroying democracy
abroad and is supporting and keeping in power dozens of corrupt
Catholic dictators. Modern U. S. policy is dividing the world
into two hostile camps: Communists and Catholic dictators,
thus destroying its own Protestant heritage.
A great threat to freedom and progress is anti-ism, i. e.,
character assassination of any non-conformist by falsely classi-
fying him into a hate group or a group most hated. We are being
brainwashed into believing that any opposition to political
Catholicism is absolute bigotry and prejudice. While Rome may
claim for herself alone infallibility and divine truth, and may
denounce any Protestant Bishop, Jewish Rabbi, Tibetan Lama
or oriental god-king as heretic, schismatic, unbeliever or im-
postor, we, non-Catholics, may not so much as disagree with
the political opinions of Rome.
Protestants are not anti-Catholic. While Catholic countries
close the doors of Protestant churches, Protestant America
would gladly shed its blood to fight for the religious freedom
of its Catholic brethren. The State of Minnesota, which is
almost solidly Lutheran, was so anxious to show the world
that it is liberal-minded that Lutheran Senator Edward J. Thye
was defeated and Catholic Eugene J. McCarthy was elected
as senator. Besides the Catholic mayors, chiefs of police, judges
and governors, there are about one hundred Catholic members
of Congress in Washington, D. C., more Catholics than any
other denomination or religion. It is, therefore, evident that
the Jesuits and their lay-stooges are going to call us anti-
Catholic until we have sold our birth right one hundred per
cent and have given Rome sole control. Even in the Al Smith
campaign of 1928 the Catholics gave their candidate only 3
million votes while he received 12 million votes from the
non-Catholics (Catholic World, Nov. 1950).
Nearly two years before the 1960 election, the `Catholic-for-
President' camp began its name-calling and brain washing
campaign to soften the American voter. A recent article in Look
magazine cleverly tosses around such phrases as: "An old
taboo of American politics", "the notion that only Protestants
should be nominated for the top jobs", "the Protestants-only
taboo", "the Protestant monopoly of the White House," etc. The
author, of course, neglected to mention such `taboos' as "native
Americans only", "non-Communists only", and other precautions
by which a free nation seeks to safeguard its freedoms (Look,
March 3,1959).
Senator Paul H. `I am a Protestant' Douglas felt it necessary
to write an article in Coronet, entitled: "A Catholic can become
President," and asks: "Just what could a Catholic President of
the United States do - against the will of the non-Catholic
majority - to aid the Pope?" He further warns that "we must
not deny to 36,000,000 Americans the right to have a qualified
member of their faith elected to the White House" (Coronet,
March, 1959). The senator seems to think that an American
President is just a figure head and does not seem to' know that
he is the Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces and exercises
probably more authority than any other human being on earth.
The senator seems to think that Catholics have a "right" to
make Protestants vote for a Catholic president. No religion has
a legal right to have one of its members in the White House.
When the country elected President Eisenhower, it was not
generally known whether he was affiliated with any church. He
was elected by a landslide because his loyalty towards his
country, was believed to be beyond a shadow of a doubt. Even
if the nation had elected Eisenhower because he was such a
good "Protestant", what makes the Protestant Senator think
that Catholics may take the religion of a candidate into con-
sideration, but Protestants not? No American Catholic has ever
been able to crash the Vatican in papal elections, why should
he have a "right" to crash the White House? Which Catholic
country votes Protestants into the highest office of the land?
The Constitutions of Catholic countries like Spain, Argentina,
Paraguay, etc., provide that the head of the State must be a
member of the Catholic church, thus excluding all Protestants,
Jews and candidates of other faiths. It would have been less
ridiculous for a Trotestant' Senator to have written to the Pope
106 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R0036000'P0077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
and to have pointed out that among the newly appointed
Cardinals not a single one was of the Protestant or Jewish faith.
Because seven presidents happened to be of Holland-Dutch
descent, it does not mean that now an Irishman has the 'right'
to head the nation. Baptists, Lutherans, Mormons, Jews, Mo-
hammedans, etc., do not take `turns' in the presidency, but who-
soever receives the confidence and the votes of the country as
a whole, he is the man. To hint that `Protestants' are prejudiced
is raising an accusing finger at 80% of our citizens and totally
ignoring the anti-democratic remarks of the leaders of the Ro-
man Catholic Church. Dozens of brave non-Catholics hate
lost their jobs and millions of dollars have been spent in courts
to keep the hands of the Jesuits out of the U. S. treasury, to keep
them from using our armed forces, our stamps, our public
highways for advertising their brand of religion. How long can
we keep it up, Senator Douglas, and what will they think of
under a Catholic administration?
Why did not the "Protestant" Senator give his job to a Catho-
lic? Any honest or informed man would rather have pointed out
how anti-democratic, anti-social and anti-Protestant the Roman
Catholic Church is, but Senator Douglas undoubtedly considers
that `taboo' and `prejudice'.
"Make America Catholic" read the huge banner which the
Paulist Fathers displayed in the streets of downtown New York
City. "The time has arrived when Catholics should not be blind
voters in keeping with their longtime Democratic and Republi-
can faith," shouted Bishop Noll in Kansas City. Jesuit Father
Francis X. Talbot predicted the doom of American civilization
when he said: "The old Protestant culture is about at the end
of its rope. The first settlers of our country established this
distinctly Protestant culture ... It has given the complexion
to this country, entered our legislation, sociology and economics,
is the basis of our commerce and industry, and, in fact, has
formed a great part of the American people ... This Christian
culture is a wave receding, and we Catholics are living in a
most important day, with one culture vanishing, another gain-
ing strength. Why can't we raise the tidal wave that will bring
Catholic culture into the United States? Why can't we make
the United States Catholic in legislation, Catholic in justice, aims
and ideals? ... We are now ready to expand. Now is the time
to organize and strike hard to put the Catholic idea before all"
(New York World, Dec. 14, 1930). "How we Catholics have
loathed and despised this Lucifer civilization ... This civiliza-
tion is now called democracy" (America, Jesuit weekly, May
17,1941).
These men, who despise our American way of life, are seeking
power to destroy us. These are the men who by some mysterious
charm can persuade even a `Protestant' senator to turn against
his own people. As we have seen, these men do not tolerate
other religions besides their own. They are anti-Protestant
not only where they are in a majority, but where they enjoy the
greatest freedom as a minority. The Archbishop of Santa Fe,
N. M., succeeded in ousting every Protestant from the Santa
Fe School board (Presbyterian Life, Aug. 15, 1958). What will
these bishops be able to do under Catholic leadership? As we
have shown, these men are intolerant, and boast that they may
not tolerate evil and error (Protestantism) in their midst. They
are anti-Public School, anti-State, anti-equality, anti-democratic
and anti-social in all their actions. Bishop John O'Hara of
Buffalo laid down this generally accepted rule for Catholic
school children: "First of all, Catholics are not permitted to
attend baccalaureate or commencement services held in a non-
Catholic church. Secondly Catholics are not permitted to attend
a Protestant service held anywhere ... even though the priest
is requested to give the sermon" (Buffalo Chancery, March,
1947). "The real glory of being a citizen of the United States
is that it always comes second ... Being a Catholic ... comes
first" (Commonweal, Dec. 2,1949; vol. 51, p. 231).
Thus a majority is pleading with a minority just to practice
a little bit of tolerance and charity, and to do unto others as
they would like to be treated. But they flatly refuse to accept
our American ideals and openly advocate to overthrow them.
The chances of a Democratic victory look very good, with or
without a Catholic candidate. If the Republicans should nomi-
nate Nixon and Mrs. Clare Booth Luce for Vice-President, the
Catholics will get their foot in the White House either way.
108 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R0036NO70077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
Our newspapers and national magazines. seem to have com-
pletely surrendered to Catholic pressure. Labor seems to have
surrendered to the Roman yoke. There are indications that Rome
has been assured of the vote of some minorities.
Of the 16 million Negroes in the U. S. about 15,12' million are
Protestant. Rome was not interested in this poor segment of
our population until the National Association for the Advance-
ment of the Colored People began to organize them into a
political group. Very few Negroes have joined the NAACP,
but nearly all are expected to follow its political directions. The
Jesuits have never been pro-Negro, and political organizations
of the Catholic Church, like the Knights of Columbus, have
barred Negroes from membership, even in the North (Time,
Sept. 15, 1958). Unless the NAACP can believe that it was the
Roman hierarchy which kept the Little Rock incident on our
front pages, it should not support a Catholic president. Yet
Rome may succeed in convincing an oppressed group to vote
for another minority group, just out of principle.
Of the 5 million Jews in the U. S. some may feel sympathetic
towards a new adventure in electing a president not by party,
but by faith. Pope Innocent III (1215) forbade the Jews to
run for public office and forced them to wear a special
garb (Mansi 22, 1055). The Jesuits selected Catholic Hitler
to introduce the same and worse customs for their new Holy
Roman Empire. It is hard to believe that Jewish leadership will
encourage the support of a Catholic candidate simply because
Catholicism is sometimes called a minority.
The American people will realize that Catholics have a habit
of staying in power once they gain it. Their methods of boycott,
censure, pressure and blackmail will perpetuate them in power.
Public funds will start flowing into Catholic enterprises. Once
the State begins to subsidize parochial schools, Rome is in
business. Catholic schools, hospitals, churches, etc., do not belong
to the Catholic population but to the bishop alone. He is a
one-man organization, incorporated as such by special privilege
("corporation sole"). Without having to bother with the wishes
of the people or with the votes of a board of trustees, the bishop
can start any private enterprise, using Catholic property as
collateral.
Besides minority groups and labor unions, we have other
pressure groups, from oil-industries to lodges. It seems now
generally admitted that those American citizens who do not
belong to these pressure groups, no longer have representation
in Washington, D. C. If true, this would make the Catholic
pressure groups the more dangerous. Columnist David
Lawrence summed up the activities of the 85th Congress (Aug.
1958) by quoting a famous journalist who had covered every
session, and who calls it a congress of "vote-trading", "log-
rolling" and "legislative juggling . . . behind the scenes",
"mainly concerned with local projects or the pressure of voting
groups, and evidently of the belief that the country as a whole
would never find out what really happened" (Aug. 26, 1958).
In other words, our Congress, which becomes more and more
Catholic, is betraying the citizens whom it should represent.
Al, SMITH'S CREED (1927)
In the days of Alfred E. Smith one article of the "Syllabus"
was quoted to point out Catholic belief, and the Catholic can-
didate replied that he had never heard of this document till his
opponents mentioned it. He used the old jesuitical method of
calling it an old and "obsolete" document, thereby inferring
that his opponent was maliciously attacking him without cause.
In one breath, Smith first refers to his ignorance to prove one
point and then turns `expert' by declaring it obsolete. Not even
Cardinal Spellman has the authority to define Catholic doctrine,
or to declare which papal bulls are still infallible and which have
become obsolete. Smith further ridiculed the Protestant for
thinking that all Catholics are alike. The voter has no time to
psychoanalize every candidate, and certainly has no desire to
vote only for 'bad' Catholics. He knows that those who have
the support of their hierarchy definitely have obligations towards
their church.
Such old standards as "without mental reservation" do not
prove the integrity and sincerity of a 'creed'-writing candidate.
The candidate is free to stay with his church or to leave it. But
as long as the reigning pope refuses to retract the papal bulls
of the last centuries and the Jesuits refuse to retract their hate
mongering in their "America" magazine, any loyal, non-Catho-
lic citizen naturally refuses to vote a member of such a hate-
110 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003699p70077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
organization into power.
"I recognize no power in the institutions of my Church to
interfere with the operations of the Constitution of the United
States or the enforcement of the law of the land. I believe in
absolute freedom of conscience for all men and in equality of
all churches, all sects, and all beliefs before the law as a matter
of right and not as a matter of favor. I believe in the absolute
separation of Church and State ... I believe that no tribunal
of any church has any power to make any decree of any force
in the law of the land. I believe in the support of the public
school as. one of the corner stones of American liberty" (Alfred
E. Smith, "Catholic and Patriot," in Atlantic Monthly, April,
1927, vol. 139, p. 728).
Catholic professor Edmond J. Moore, who wrote a book
entitled: "Al Smith runs for President," warned Senator John
F. Kennedy in Jan. 1959, not to duplicate Al Smith's mistake
of putting his political `creed' in print. Yet Kennedy did not
heed the warning. After he published his creed, the Catholic
press mildly rebuked his heresies (see pages 89-90) so that
after the election no one can have an excuse of not knowing that
Kennedy was in error, and may not keep his promises.
by AP, Feb. 16, 1959).
John Kennedy, like Al Smith, wants the public to believe that
he is a lberal' Catholic, different from the others. Voters ought
to ask a Catholic candidate this question: `Are you a good
Catholic or a bad one?' If he answers `a good Catholic', we know
that he cannot be a good President, for his first allegiance will
be to the Pope of Rome. If he answers 'a bad Catholic', we
certainly do not want him in the White House. A man without
sincerity in matters of religion cannot be trusted in matters of
state.
JOHN F. KENNEDY'S CREED (1959)
"Whatever one's religion in his private life may be, for the
officeholder, nothing takes precedence over his oath to uphold
the Constitution and all its parts-including the First Amend-
ment and the strict separation of church and state ... I believe
as a senator that the separation of Church and State is funda-
mental to our American concept and heritage and should
remain so. I am flatly opposed to appointment of an ambassador
to the Vatican. Whatever advantages it might have in Rome-
and I'm not convinced of these-they would be more than offset
by the divisive effect at home. The first Amendment to the
Constitution is an infinitely wise one. There can be no question
of Federal funds being used for support of parochial or private
schools. It's unconstitutional under the First Amendment as
interpreted by the Supreme Court. I'm opposed to the Federal
Government's extending support to sustain any church or its
schools" (John F. Kennedy; in Look, March 3. 1959; as quoted
112 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600 '80077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600070077-4
PAPAL EXCOMMUNICATIONS OF SECULAR RULERS
A.D. 1076 Pope Gregory VII excommunicated King Henry IV:
"0 Blessed Peter ... by your power and authority I depose
King Henry ... from the government of any and all kingdoms
of Germany and Italy ... and I loose all Christians from the
bonds of their oaths which they have taken .:. and I forbid
anyone to serve him as King" (Migne, P.L. 148, 74; Liber Pont.
2, 283) .
A.D. 1209 Pope Innocent III excommunicated King John of
England and in 1212 the pope declared the English king deposed
and asked King Philip of France to invade the British Isles unless
the English king surrendered his kingdom to Rome and agreed
to govern it as a papal fief. The sentence of excommunication
included the eternal damnation of his entire family: "His sen-
tence is absolutely irrevocable ... His viper progeny included"
(Milman H.H., Hist. of Latin Christ., vol. 5, p. 487).
A.D. 1215 Pope Innocent III excommunicated the English Barons
(Thomas Rymer, Foedera, vol. 1, part 1, p. 69), and condemned
the Magna Charta which demanded separation of pope and
state: "That the Church of England shall be free and have her
whole rights and her liberties inviolable" (Art. 1; Mirbt, No.
314).
A.D. 1239 Pope Gregory IX, who constantly excommunicated
Frederick II, beginning with Coena Domini, March 21, 1228
(Bullarium, vol. 3, p. 429), incited assassination by placing the
whole world under interdict, i.e., depriving it from the sacra-
ments of salvation: "We have placed under ecclesiastical inter-
dict the cities, camps, homes, and other places where he may
be found, as long as he stays there" (Bullarium III, 499).
A.D. 1303 Pope Boniface VIII, as recorded by contemporary
historians, "sought to oppress the King of France with excom-
munications and by other means in order to deprive him of the
kingdom" (Villani, bk 8, chapt. 63; Muratori, R.I.S., 13, 395).
A.D. 1535 Pope Paul III excommunicated King Henry VIII of
England: "We proclaim . . . that King Henry has incurred the
penalty of deprivation of his kingdom ... that he must be de-
prived of church burial and We smite them with the sword of
anathema, malediction and eternal damnation . . . And let the
sons of King Henry . . . share the punishment . . . And We
absolve and totally release from their oath of allegiance all the
subjects of the same King Henry" (Bull "Ejus qui immobilis,"
Bullarium, Turin ed., vol. 6, p. 195).
A.D. 1570 Pope Pius V excommunicated Queen Elizabeth of
England: "He that reigns in the highest ... entrusted the govern-
ment of the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church, outside
of which there is no salvation, to one man alone ... the Roman
Pontiff.... This one man He set up as Chief over all nations
and all kingdoms, to seize, destroy, scatter, dispose . . . We
declare the aforesaid Elizabeth, being a heretic and a supporter
of heretics, and her adherents in this matter, to have incurred
the sentence of anathema . . . and all others who have taken an
oath of any kind to her We declare to be absolved forever from
such an oath and from all duty of dominion, fidelity and obe-
dience" (Bull "Regnans in excelsis," Bullarium 7, 810).
Not only secular rulers, but also religious leaders like John
Hus, John Wycliff, Martin Luther, etc., were subjected to papal
excommunications and to the vilest curses. Every local bishop
claims similar powers, even the right to impose eternal hell fire
on innocent relatives. The Archbishop of Santa Fe, N. M., ex-
communicates girls participating in beauty contests: "Yesterday
the office of the archbishop affirmed that Miss Ingersoll and
her family would be deprived of the sacraments . . . if she
parades publicly in a bathing suit" (AP July 4, '59). A church
which never excommunicated a murderer like Hitler, never
abolished legalized prostitution in Catholic Spain, never excom-
municated the 80,000 unionized prostitutes of Chicago, will
excommunicate innocent relatives and innocent bystanders in
order to obtain its selfish ends. We cannot afford to allow an
American president to become subject to the papal system of
excommunications.
114 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80B01676R003600Q 0077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
"No people in history who have lost their freedom ever deliber-
ately and knowingly voted its abandonment. In every case it was
taken by conquest or stealth"-J. C. Penney (New Age mag.,
July, 1957).
"Our liberties are safe ... until legislators have resigned their
functions to ecclesiastical power and their prerogatives to
priests"-President Wilson.
"Keep the Church and State separate"-President Ulysses S.
Grant.
"From the beginning of the war there has been, not a secret,
but a public alliance between the Pope of Rome and Jefferson
Davis ... The Jesuits are so expert in their deeds of blood"-
President Abraham Lincoln.
"I do not like the reappearance of the Jesuits ... Their restora-
tion is indeed a step towards darkness, cruelty, perfidy, despo-
tism, death"-President John Adams.
"If the United States ever loses her liberty, it will be through
the Romish priesthood"-President George Washington.
The Jesuits should be "suppressed, extinguished, abolished and
abrogated FOREVER"-Pope Clement XIV.
"And thus I hide my naked villainy,
With old, odd ends, stolen forth of Holy Writ,
And seem a saint, when I play the Devil"-William Shakespeare.
(King Richard III, Act 1, scene 3)
"No Italian priest shall tithe or toll in our Dominions ...
So tell the pope . . . and his usurped authority"-William
Shakespeare.
(King John, Act 3, scene 1)
"Rome, subdued she is a Lamb,
Treated as an equal she is a Fox
When in power she is a hungry Lion."
BIBLIOGRAPHY
of original sources, with at least one library where books may
be found.
Acta Sanctae Sedis; a monthly and continuation of the Bul-
larium Romanum. Rome, 1865 - (Berkeley, Calif.)
Baronius, Caesar, d. 1607 (the "Venerable" Italian Cardinal)
Annales Ecclesiastici, Lucca, 1774. 38 folio vols. (Newberry
Library, Chicago; and in nearly all State universities)
St. Bridget (Birgitta of Sweden), d. 1373 (Prophetess and
Saint) Revelationes, Nuremberg, 1500. (Newberry Library,
Chicago)
Bullarium Romanum, Rome, 1733-1857; Turin edition, 1857-
1885. 51 vols. (in Berkeley; Newberry; Iowa City; Urbana;
etc. )
Burchard, Bishop John, d. 1506 (Pontifical biographer)
Diarium, Paris, 1885. 3 vols. (Newberry; Madison, Wis.)
Dupuy, Pierre, d. 1651, ed. (Paris. National Library. Dept.
of Manuscripts) Preuves de l' Histoire du dif ferend de Bo-
niface et Philippes le Bel, 683 p.; bound with Histoire du
di f f erend . . . Paris, 1655. (Minneapolis; Newberry; Chicago
Univ.)
Hefele, Bishop Carl Joseph von (greatest scholar on the councils
and speaker at Vatican Council, 1870) Conciliengeschichte.
Freiburg, 1890. 9 vols. (Urbana, Ill. )
Huillard-Breholles, J. L. Alphonse, d. 1871, ed. Historia diplo-
matica Frederici Secundi, Paris, 1852. 11 vols. (Newberry
Library; Univ. of Chicago)
Liber Pontificalis, ed. by Msgr. Louis M. O. Duchesne, d. 1922;
Paris, 1892. 2 folio vols. (Newberry; Univ. of Chicago)
Mansi, John Dominic, d. 1769, ed. (Italian Archbishop)
Sacrorum Conciliorum Collectio, Florence, Venice, 1758-1798;
extended to 58 folio volumes. (Marquette; Urbana; U.S.C.;
116 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600M077-4
 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4
Migne, Jack Paul,. d. _ 1875, ed. (French priest-scholar)
Patrologiae Latinae and Patrologiae Graecae cursus, Paris,
1844-1857. 473 volumes. (New York Public Library; Union
Theol. Sem.; Philadelphia; Washington, D. C.; Univ. of Chi-
cago; Newberry; Milwaukee; Madison, Wis.; Urbana, Ill.;
Iowa City; Minneapolis; Lincoln, Neb.; USC and UCLA in
Los Angeles; Berkeley, Calif.; etc.)
Mirbt, Carl Theodor, b. 1860 (Lutheran prof. of church hist.)
Quellen zur geschichte des Papstthums and des romische
Katholizismus, Leipzig,. 1895, Tubingen, 1935 (UCLA and
and Berkely, Calif,)
Monumenta Germaniae Historica, ed. by Pertz, etc.: Scripto-
res Rerum Germanicarum, -Hanover, 1894, 42 vols.;, - Leges,
and other collections, totalling 127 vols. (USC Los Angeles-)
Muratori, Louis Anthony, d. 1750, ed. (Italian priest-scholar)
Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, Milan 1751. 31 folio vols.
Annali d Italia, Milan, 1744-1749. 12 folio vols.
Antiquitates Italiae Medii Aevi, Milan, 1742. 8 folio vols. (New-
berry; USC)
Rymer, Thomas, 1641-1713, ed. (Gt. Britain. Manuscripts)
Foedera, conventiones, litterae et . . . acta publica inter
reges Angliae et alios; London, 3rd ed. 1745, 40 folio volumes
(UCLA)
Thomas Aquinas, d. 1274 "Summa Theologica" (English text)
London, 1928. 22 vols. (in nearly all universities)
118 Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R003600070077-4