Economic Intelligence Weekly Review, November 2, 1978

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
64
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 7, 2004
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 8, 1978
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5.pdf2.8 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved F r e 7 fA 80 0702 090)050002-5 TMR4 TO: Approved For FROM: o/~~2 EXTENSION I l~%e 2004MMIP: CIA-RDP80TO 702A000900 50002-5 REPLACES FORM 36-8 (47) WHICH MAY BE USED. FORM NO .241 1 FFR 5S L'r 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Next 12 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 ApprovedFFor Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Economic Intelligence Weekly Review 'ti EE3W11 78-044 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5~ Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE WEEKLY REVIEW France and the EMS: Third Time Around ................................................ Paris sees a complementarity between membership in the proposed European Monetary System and its economic policy goals of reining in domestic inflation and improving the competitiveness of French exports. India: Slowdown in Manufactured Exports Boom .................................... Export growth will proceed at a slower pace because of shortages of electric power, coal, and steel; growing labor unrest; and the govern- ment's shift in emphasis toward Internal needs. ASEAN Stabex Proposal: Complication in Common Fund Dialogue ............. 17 Officials from Japan and the five ASEAN member states have been holding discussions that could lead to still another international program for commodity export compensation. Sudan: Arab Largess Breeds Financial Problems ....................................... 21 Large Arab aid Inflows have required matching local funds, with foreign exchange shortfalls and domestic Inflation the result. Cuba: Citrus Development Threatens World Markets ............................... 26 As Cuban shipments gradually gain ground In the CEMA market, Mediter- ranean suppliers will likely focus on the European Community, increasing the difficulties for US growers in the latter market. Cuba: New Africa/Mideast Air Links Planned ......................................... 28 The expansion fits in with the extensive Cuban and Soviet Involvement in African political and military affairs. Note ........... ......................................................................................... 31 Vietnam's Military Demands Add to Economic Woes i SECRET 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 FRANCE AND THE EMS: THIRD TIME AROUND * French President Valery Giscard d'Estaing's decision to enter the European Monetary System (EMS) appears as firm as any political decision can be. While political considerations are dominant, the government argues that economic conditions are more favorable for such a move than at any time in years. France's current account has just returned to balance, although continuing rapid inflation generates skepticism about tying the franc to the deutsche mark. The motivations behind Giscard's EMS decision revolve essentially around the following: (a) the traditional French desire for fixed exchange rates, (b) the weakness of the US dollar and the general instability of international currency markets, (c) the desire to enhance French influence in a more unified European Community, and (d) the complementarity between EMS membership and domestic economic policy goals, especially slower inflation and improved competitiveness. The EMS, currently planned for implementation on 1 January 1979, is shaping up as an expansion of the present joint float-the so-called snake-with the French franc and possibly the Italian lira, the British and Irish pounds, and some other European currencies as additional participating currencies. Although serious differences remain to be worked out at the negotiating/technical level, Giscard and West German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt clearly have concluded that Europe must do something, even if the risk of failure is considerable. The two leaders appear to have the personal will and political clout to overcome the many technical obstacles to early implementa- tion of the EMS. If need be, they may go it alone in launching an expanded currency system. Whether France will be able to remain in the EMS for long will depend on (a) the durability and results of Prime Minister Raymond Barre's anti-inflationary policies, (b) the flexibility of the new currency arrangements, and (c) the course of internation- al currency speculation. To enhance chances of staying in the EMS, the French 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Ratios of Francs to Deutsche Marks and French to German Consumer Prices (Index: 1973 1=100) 1. Index of French franc(deutsche mark cross-rates. An increase in the index shows weakening of the franc vis-a-vis the deutsche mark. 2. Ratio of the French consumer price index to that of West Germany. A comparison of the wholesale price index reveals similar trends. Government probably will engineer a devaluation of the franc prior to initiation of the EMS. Once the system is operating, Paris would opt for further periodic devaluations rather than an externally imposed increase in austerity. France would drop out if remaining meant changes in domestic policy that Giscard perceived as clearly against the national interest or inconsistent with his political survival. The skepticism of outside observers for the long-term outlook of the EMS appears justified. Despite the history of previous European monetary failures and the franc's record as a two-time snake drop-out (January 1974 and March 1976), Giscard and Schmidt have concluded that another attempt must be made to link the currencies of EC members. The two leaders agree on the urgency of forming the EMS. The chicken-egg question of which should come first, coordination of economic policies or of exchange rates, has been answered in favor of the latter, at least for now. The French, who 2 SECRET Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 traditionally favor fixed exchange rates, believe they have convinced the West Germans of the evils of floating. An indication of French opinion on this subject is contained in the late-September press quotation of an unnamed Finance Ministry official: ". . . [France's] greatest intellectual victory is that the Germans, previously unconditional allies of Washington, now agree with the French point of view that the current situation is intolerable." Another factor pushing France toward the EMS decision is a conviction that the weakness and particularly the instability of the US dollar have been the primary cause of intra-European exchange rate problems. Although Giscard believes a truly durable international currency system must await some solution to the "dollar problem," he is firmly convinced that a "European zone of monetary stability" is needed to create a buffer for the European currencies against dollar fluctations. Furthermore, Giscard probably hopes that a European demonstration of decisiveness and solidarity will encourage stronger US action to help stabilize foreign currency markets. French political ambitions are perhaps an even more important factor underlying the decision. Giscard wants France to play a greater role in the world and believes that both politically and economically this can be achieved only through a stronger Europe, with France as its natural leader. Giscard views 1979 as "the year of Europe," marked by the first direct election to the European Parliament, progress toward accession to the Community of three new members, and implementation of an EMS as another step toward the long-heralded Economic and Monetary Union. For Giscard, the year's importance is increased further by France's succession to the EC Presidency, replacing West Germany, on 1 January 1979. In addition to wanting progress toward the EMS while their respective countries occupy the EC presidency, Giscard and Schmidt may feel that pushing hard against a short deadline is the only way to obtain a decision among nine countries with differing political aspirations, economic policies, and business trends. Complementarity of Internal Policies and the EMS The French Government is hoping that efforts to remain a full and strong partner in the EMS will reinforce domestic anti-inflationary and modernization policies. Opinion in Paris supports the Barre prescription of giving top priority to checking inflation, provided that efforts are made simultaneously to limit unemployment. Many economic advisers doubt the possibility of meeting official inflation targets-a 6-percent annual inflation rate by the end of next year, an average rate for 1979 of 8 percent-under the best of circumstances. Paris hopes that joining the EMS will buoy up the franc and force the inflation rate lower than it otherwise would be. Prime Minister Barre, who initially advised against EMS, is now a vocal supporter. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Other longstanding French goals have been translated into policy initiatives since the March 1978 reelection of the center-right parliamentary coalition. To achieve the dream of matching West German free-market dynamism and international competi- tiveness, Paris has removed nearly all industrial price controls; plans to progressively reduce subsidies to public utilities and services as well as state-owned firms, permitting compensating price hikes; and threatens to cut off financial assistance to noncompeti- tive private firms. The resulting "bubble" in the inflation rate does not greatly concern the government, which considers it a necessary short-term result of more realistic policies. Rising unemployment continues to pose a threat to the French economic strategy. Giscard and Barre clung stubbornly to their economic plan through the election campaign ending last March, ignoring pleas of political advisers who wanted expansionary policies to improve the governing coalition's chances. With the center- right comfortably ensconced in the National Assembly and the next important political test not due until the 1981 presidential election, they now have less reason than before to veer off from attempts to wring inflation out of the economy and make France a more modern industrial state. Negotiating From the Top * Since the July EC Summit endorsement of the EMS concept, representatives of member governments have been trying to work out technical details in the EC Commission's Monetary Committee and in the EC Central Bank Governors Commit- tee. Discussions stalled in August, primarily over a disagreement between French and German negotiators concerning the method of defining the exchange rate limits of the system. The French delegation had been pushing for the currency basket concept, which in some instances of exchange rate pressure could put the burden of intervention and policy adjustment on a single strong-currency country (presumably West Germany). Giscard and Schmidt appeared to have resolved the issue at one of their regular 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 tete-a-tetes in mid-September. Faced with flat West Geman refusal to accept the basket concept, the French President abandoned his position and agreed to accept the parity-grid system. Thus, the grid system currently employed in the snake would be used for determining intervention points; the basket approach would be employed simply as a warning system to trigger discussions on possible intervention or domestic policy changes before the grid system's obligatory intervention points were reached. Despite the Giscard-Schmidt agreement "in principle," EC negotiations continue to stumble over practically the same differences as those presumably resolved, at least between the French and Germans. Non-German EC members, including the French, are pushing for a more definite role for the basket in determining intervention obligations of a strong-currency country; the West Germans continue to resist. On the surface, French negotiators seem not to have received word of their President's change of mind. A more plausible explanation of their persistence is that France intends to push for concessions-particularly regarding West German intervention obligations in the event of severe dollar fluctuations-until a complete agreement is worked out. In any event, negotiators probably recognize that differences will ultimately be resolved at the highest level. To the weak-currency countries, the currency basket issue and the disagreement over the size of EMS support facilities have become symbolic of West German reluctance to make commitments entailing substantial costs. In fact, the West German position is regarded as a retreat from the EC's agreed goal of a qualitatively new currency system. For its part, France clearly wants to avoid having to expend huge amounts of reserve funds in a fruitless effort to support its currency, as it did when trying to stay in the snake in early 1976. While West Germany loaned deutsche marks for intervention in 1976 and presumably would do so again, France would much prefer to obtain a formal German commitment to act directly in the market against a rising deutsche mark rather than for a falling franc. Giscard and Schmidt meet again today in Paris. Another agreement "in principle" will likely be announced, although basic differences concerning interven- tion obligations and credit facilities surely will persist. Moreover, other countries may resent such self-appointed Franco-German leadership even more than in the past. Thus far, most compromises have reflected concessions by Giscard, and the same pattern may emerge from the next Franco-German summit. In the meantime, however, the French President will have his negotiators push for all possible concessions from the West Germans. While the final outcome at the 4-5 Decmeber EC Council meeting may differ little from the compromise reached at the mid-September summit, French negotiating pressure may produce some give in the West German position. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Prospects for France and the EMS-A Mixed Bag President Giscard now seems determined to take France into a European Monetary System at the earliest moment. As long as Chancellor Schmidt remains equally resolute regarding EMS, technical problems and continued opposition from lower levels of the French and West German Governments could be swept aside. Nevertheless, economic or political pressures might yet cause either of the two leaders to shift position, at least enough to delay implementation of EMS beyond the 1 January 1979 target date. The franc's prospects once in the EMS will depend on the technical specification of the system and on its functioning. The wider the bands for fluctuation and the greater the resources for intervention and credit support, the longer the system can operate without parity changes. The inflation differential between France and West Germany will be a benchmark for determining the chances of the EMS, and it likely will remain relatively wide. French officials argue, however, that France's underlying rate of inflation is around 8 percent rather than the current observed rate of about 10 percent. They contend that the observed rate has been ratcheted upward by one-time price increases resulting from price deregulation and government-administered rate hikes. The French also assert that West Germany's underlying inflation rate is higher than the registered 3 percent, as deutsche mark appreciation has produced a drop in import prices and an artificially low rate of consumer price increases. Given greater stability in intra-European exchange rates, the West German inflation rate could well rise by one or two percentage points. The resulting gap of three to five percentage points between France and West Germany could be taken care of with periodic currency realignments within the EMS, provided that speculative currency flows did not add excessively to exchange rate pressures. The outlook for smooth adjustments is brightened by increasing French and West German willingness to accept timely devaluations/revaluations. France is particular has indicated that it would devalue its currency within the EMS in response to divergent economic trends. Other than speculation, the factor most likely to prevent France from remaining in the EMS would be domestic pressure to pursue policies not in accordance with EMS objectives. At the moment, Giscard judges the two complementary; current policy and expected pressures from EMS membership point in the same direction. He wants a strong franc (like the deutsche mark) and a strong economy (like Germany's). The key short-term policy goal of slowing inflation is consistent with EMS membership. France does not expect the EMS to force more austere policies than those currently employed; rather, the EMS would be used only as additional justification for such policies. If Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 continued EMS membership should come to depend on more austere policies, the French would be likely to withdraw. Giscard may in fact be forced to draw back from current anti-inflationary policy before its objectives are achieved. Unhappiness with the Barre Plan, particularly as reflected in record unemployment, is widespread and increasing. The leftist labor unions and the Socialist and Communist parties are currently dispirited and disorgan- ized, but strike activity is on the rise. More importantly, Giscard's Gaullist coalition partners-nationalistic, distrustful of the European Community, and concerned about unemployment-might choose unfavorable economic trends as the ground for a break with the majority. Unless Paris can point to a visible slowdown in inflation by the middle of next year, pressure to stimulate economic activity and reduce unemploy- ment could become irresistible. A policy reversal would dash Giscard's hope of bringing France's inflation rate into closer alignment with West Germany's and ultimately doom the latest attempt at closer monetary coordination in the European Community. With manufactured exports expected to reach $3.5 billion this year, India ranks high among LDC exporters of manufactured goods, but well behind South Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. Backed with considerable formal and informal encourage- ment from the government, India's export gains have been based largely on selling steel and machinery to Middle East OPEC countries and textiles, clothing, and yarn in developed country markets, Export growth is now being hurt by domestic shortages of key industrial inputs and growing labor unrest. Moreover, New Delhi's new five-year plan (1978-83) reduces the priority of heavy industry, which has been the main underpinning for export growth. These factors almost certainly will retard export expansion over the next several years even though India should do well in selected markets-for example, in sales of machinery to LDCs. Export Record Between 1970 and 1977, foreign sales of manufactured goods climbed from $1.1 billion to an estimated $3.2 billion, growing at a rate of 17 percent annually or double the rate of the 1960s. Export growth is slowing this year, however, and sales are expected to show only a small increase, to $3.5 billion. Despite its success in tapping foreign markets, India has not matched the pace of other leading LDC exporters. Its Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 share of LDC exports of manufactured goods to the OECD countries, for example, slipped from almost 9 percent in 1970 to 6 percent in 1977. India: Destination of Manufactured Exports -- Average Annual 1970 1977 Percent Growth World ..... ......................................................................... 1,067 3,200 17 OECD .......... ....................... ...................... _................. . 462 1,525 19 Of which: United States ......... .................... ................... ...... 169 382 12 France .__ ............................... .......... .................... 13 115 37 West Germany ........................ ............ ............... 25 238 38 Italy ........... .......................................................... 9 113 44 United Kingdom ............ ................................ .... 74 276 21 Japan ......... ...................... ..................... .............. 63 95 6 OPEC .......................................................................... 95 500 27 Of which: Saudi Arabia ...................................... _............... 11 75 32 Iran.. ................. ............ ....... __ ....................... 28 90 18 Kuwait ................................................_.............. 12 90 33 United Arab Emirates ........................................ 28 110 22 Far East ...................................................................... 125 325 15 Africa ......................... ................... ......:._.................... 36 130 20 USSR ....... .......... ..................................... ..................... 148 280 10 Eastern Europe .......................................................... 81 150 9 Other ................... .............. ............ ...... ....._................ 120 290 13 Export expansion has partly compensated for the slow growth of domestic demand and resulting underutilization of manufacturing capacity. Exports of steel products accounted for nearly 20 percent of domestic steel output in 1976 and 1977 compared with an average of 6 percent in the early 1970s. Textile production received a major boost following the 1973/74 OPEC oil price hikes because the bulk of output was cotton goods whereas other major LDC exporters had already converted to petroleum-based synthetic fibers. The export push has focused on shipping capital goods and intermediate iron and steel products to the Middle East and Asian LDCs, while exporting textiles and apparel to OECD countries. Sales of capital goods and intermediate products grew from $330 million in 1970 to $1.1 billion in 1977. Exports in this category cover a broad range of products including (a) heavy industrial equipment and electrical machinery; (b) a variety of steel and pig iron products; and (c) nonferrous metal manufactures such as aluminum ingots and sheets, copper, and copper alloys. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 India: Leading Manufactured Exports, by Commodity 1970 1977 Average Annual Percent Growth Manufactures .... ............................................... 1,067 3,200 17 Textiles ... ............................................... 460 800 8 Clothing; .................................................................. 36 340 38 Leather .................................................................... 95 280 17 Iron and steel ............ 131 360 16 Tubes and piping ........................................ 15 70 25 Metal manufactures ................................................ 33 150 24 Machinery .................................... ........... 38 140 20 Electrical machinery .............................................. 22 100 24 Transport equipment ............ 46 120 15 Chemicals ..................................................... 47 130 16 Other ........................................................ 144 710 26 The OECD countries and the OPEC oil producing nations together absorb nearly 65 percent of India's manufactured exports. Success in these areas has been narrowly based. In the OECD, export growth has consisted mainly of leather goods and textile sales to five countries-France, West Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In the Middle East, India has effectively cashed in on the economic development boom in the Persian Gulf states by exporting iron and steel products, machinery, and construction materials to Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. Sales to non-OPEC LDCs reached $600 million in 1977, nearly one- fifth of manufactured exports. Exports of manufactured goods to the United States, India's major trading partner, stagnated in 1977 at $382 million, roughly the same level as in 1976. A sharp drop in apparel sales-to $74 million-because of competition from East Asian suppliers was primarily responsible and cut the Indian market share to 2 percent. Textiles make up 65 percent of exports to the US market and are the major dollar earner; in 1977, textiles held a 10-percent share of the US market. Apart from these products, India has had little success in penetrating the US market with the manufactured goods that have been successfully marketed elsewhere. For example, steel products and heavy machinery sales amounted to only $24 million in 1977 and accounted for a negligible share of the market. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 India: Selected Exports by Destination, 1976 Clothing Textiles US $ 334 Million US $ 743 Million Iron and Steel US $ 367 Million Machinery and Transport Equipment US $ 315 Million 3% 2%1% El United States 11 Japan 577681 11-78 10 European Community ^ USSR and Eastern Europe Leather US $ 272 Million Africa Other Non?OPE&Inegl. Chemicals US $ 119 Million N OPEC U Africa Other Non-OPEC LDCs Other Developed Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 India: Major Commodity Market Penetration, 1977 Share of Import Market (Percent) United States Clothing 1.8 F]Metal Manufactures 0.9 0 Footwear 0.4 0 Metal Manufactures 1.3 a Electrical Machinery 03 Footwear 1.3 Textiles 2.1 fj Clothing 1.4 7 Metal Manufactures 1.3 Textiles 1.0 0 Industrial Machinery 0.3 n Electrical Machinery 0.8 -t Clothing 1.5 Textiles 1.5 a Footwear 0.5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Western Europe Sales to Western Europe reached $850 million in 1977 compared with $175 million in 1970; the United Kingdom and West Germany are by far the biggest customers. Textiles and clothing have been the leading exports, giving India a 9-percent share of the import market in the United Kingdom, and 3 percent in West Germany and France. Even these small percentages have generated a strong protectionist reaction; under the Multi-Fiber Arrangement of December 1977, import quotas on Indian sales of apparel to EC countries restrict volume increases to only 1 percent over 1976 levels. India has captured only a miniscule 0.3-percent share of the highly competitive EC heavy machinery market. Overall, India's share of the EC import market in manufactures has remained small-less than 0.5 percent throughout the 1970s. Competitive prices and low transport costs helped boost Indian exports to the OPEC countries by more than $400 million since 1970, to $500 million in 1977. Iron and steel products, construction materials, pipe, machinery, and transport equipment have been major foreign exchange earners. Manufactured exports have benefited from the success of Indian consulting and engineering consortiums in winning several large contracts, such as a $280 million contract to build 3,300 homes and the supporting infrastructure in Kuwait and a $100 million contract for a power plant in Saudi Arabia. Steel exports, $150 million in recent years, account for one-third of manufac- tured exports in the area. USSR and Eastern Europe Exports to the USSR and Eastern Europe absorbed 13 percent of total manufac- tured exports in 1977. At $430 million last year, sales were nearly twice as large as in 1970. Yarn, fabrics, and clothing make up the bulk of sales to the USSR as well as to Eastern Europe. Trade with the USSR is conducted under annual bilateral agreements which call for balancing exports and imports. India's growing trade surplus with the USSR has recently prompted Moscow to cut back imports. Competitive Factors In the 1970s India, as a long-established exporter, was able to increase manufac- tured sales in absolute terms though it lost ground relative to the vigorous new LDC exporters. Its failure to do better resulted from its inability to keep up with developments in technology, packaging, and marketing. At the same time India did Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 well in holding down price increases. The 9-percent average annual increase (1971-77) in wholesale prices of Indian manufactured products has been considerably lower than the increase in many other leading LDC exporters. Because of rupee depreciation, average dollar prices of manufactured goods have risen only 3 percent annually since 1975, less than half the rate for other leading LDC exporters and well below the rates for most developed country competitors. Since the link with the pound sterling was severed in 1975, the rupee has been permitted to depreciate on a bilateral price- adjusted basis 13 percent against the US dollar, 17 percent against the British pound, and 16 percent against the Hong Kong dollar. Labor discipline, which had deteriorated in the early 1970s, stiffened under Mrs. Gandhi's Emergency Rule (June 1975 to March 1977), with a resulting jump in productivity gains and a dampening of wage increases. Productivity gains in 1976-77 averaged 5 percent. India: Price-Adjusted Bilateral Exchange Rates Index 1973 1=100 120 60 1 1 1 ._1 _a_ j Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 In cooperation with private firms, the government has moved to beef up marketing and related services. An increasing number of trade missions are being sent overseas to conduct market analysis and acquaint importers with Indian manufac- tures. This year, for example, the Engineering Export Promotion Council, representing 6,000 firms, is sponsoring 60 trade delegations to various countries. Quality control inspections have recently been tightened. Several after-sales and service centers are being established in overseas capitals for government-owned manufacturing firms. As for financing, the government has approved but not yet established an export-import bank. In contrast to the situation in several other LDCs, notably South Korea, Taiwan, and Brazil, multinational corporations have not played a substantial role in India's export growth nor are they apt to in the future. New Delhi has maintained tight controls on foreign investment to keep majority interest and ownership in domestic hands. Although exceptions may be made in highly export-oriented and sophisticated technology areas, these restrictions and a host of administrative controls have discouraged foreign investment. Indian exporters benefit from a wide array of formal and informal incentives to support exports of manufactured goods. Cash subsidies alone amounted to an estimated $330 million in 1977, equal to 10 percent of total manufactured exports. One of the largest beneficiaries is the capital goods and machinery sector, which receives cash assistance ranging between 10 and 20 percent of f.o.b. value. Various categories of cotton textiles are eligible for rates of 10 to 12.5 percent. The rates are adjusted according to country of destination for cotton textiles and several other manufactured products. As a rule, when exporters request assistance, it normally is forthcoming on the recommendation of the appropriate government department. The Janata government, which took office in March 1977, has continued this generous policy but plans to require more justification from exporters requesting increased subsidies and broad- ened coverage. The Minister of Commerce recently observed "that subsidies while necessary to maintain India's competitiveness should not be a premium on inefficiency." Trade lobbies have been instrumental in obtaining changes in subsidy rates and in determining the coverage of eligible items. These lobbies operate through a variety of government-sponsored organizations, such as export promotion councils, development authorities, and government departments. Uncertainty over the duration of subsidy rates has caused problems for Indian firms, particularly when negotiating long-term Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 contracts, Exporters have usually asked that the subsidy rates remain unaltered for at least three years; New Delhi has generally fixed rates for one year, except for cotton textiles, where rates are reviewed every six months. Other measures used by the government to promote exports include: ? A deduction from income taxes of expenditures on export promotion, allowed at the rate of one and one-half times the actual expenditure. Large exporters, because of their high marginal income tax rates, benefit the most. ? Provision of export insurance and preferential credit rates. ? Giving first call on import licenses to assure a steady supply of raw materials and components used in the production process. The premium formerly carried by these licenses in the open market has declined since early 1978 when the government began liberalizing imports. ? Granting exporters a cash refund on excise and custom duties levied on imports of raw materials and components used in manufactured exports. The benefits of the Generalized System of Preference (GSP) to India have been partially offset by recent rises in nontariff barriers, such as quotas on textiles and clothing. Even so, India has taken full advantage of GSP and has emerged as one of its principal beneficiaries, particularly in West Germany and France. New Delhi has aggressively campaigned for increased GSP coverage of its exports. In 1977, some $550 million worth of its manufactured exports were eligible for GSP treatment, nearly one- tenth of the total benefit accruing to LDCs. Slow Growth Ahead We expect India's manufactured exports to grow at 10 to 15 percent annually in the next few years, a pace that would raise foreign sales to about $4.5 billion by the early 1980s. Signs of a slowdown in export growth are already evident, with sales of key exports such as steel, clothing, and leather goods leveling off. The slow-down partly reflects aggressive competition from other LDCs, quota restrictions imposed by developed countries, and a slowing of massive development programs in several Middle East countries. Not the least of India's short-run difficulties are serious supply bottlenecks, which have recently emerged in the industrial sector. Shortages of electric power, coal, cement, and various steel products, coupled with a resurgence of labor disputes, have hurt manufacturing output this year and have forced the government to import some Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 India: Commodity Export Trends' Dollar Value Index: 1973=100 Iron and Steel Textiles 600 -- 400 - 500 I 400 f 300 200 100 01 I I I Transportation Equipment 400 - 200 - 100 0L I i I I Leather 115 -- 110 - 105 100 r 95 - 90 85 80 75 I y-~- i 1e._.--1 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1. Note change in scales. Electrical Machinery 400 100 ' 0 1 1 I L ____ Clothing 01 I i L 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 coal and steel. Delays and late deliveries of steel and other key manufactures to foreign countries are no doubt tarnishing India's reputation as a reliable exporter and may cost future sales. Over the longer term, the Janata government's shift in economic priorities and development policy would militate against maintaining the export growth pace of the 1970s. During the next few years New Delhi intends to give more emphasis to meeting domestic needs. For example, in allocating steel between firms producing for domestic and export markets, both types of manufacturing firms will now be treated equally; formerly, export-oriented enterprises received priority. More than any previous government, Janata is also stressing expansion of small-scale industry (and agriculture) to provide employment and income for the rural poor. This "trickle up" approach contrasts sharply with government planning in the 1950s and early 1960s which stressed the expansion of heavy industry and 1 ' oundation for the export growth of the 1970s. ASEAN STABEX PROPOSAL: COMPLICATION IN COMMON FUND DIALOGUE The countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand) are pressing Japan for a new system of compensation for declines in the value of commodity exports. Officials from Japan and the five ASEAN member states met in Jakarta last month to discuss creating some version of the European Community's STABEX system; they-are scheduled to meet again in December. These talks, which sandwich the November reopening of Common Fund negotiations, could lead to yet another form of commodity export compensation in what is rapidly becoming a tangled skein of such programs. Although the Japanese have made no commitments to date, the pressures on them to respond cooperatively are increasing. They could choose to announce financial support for an AESEAN stabex to improve their relations with the Third World before or during the UNCTAD V sessions (scheduled for Manila in May 1979). Meanwhile, preparatory talks on this issue will add another complicating factor to the muddled dialogue on a Common Fund. Compensation and Stabilization Facilities Long seized with the notion that shifting terms of trade for commodity exports are at the heart of their trade, payments, and growth problems, a substantial bloc of 2 November 1978 SECRET Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 SECRET I DCs has lobbied through their UN caucus-the Group of 77 (G-77)-for a variety of facilities to offset shortfalls in export earnings. The two basic types of remedies they have pressed for (or have elicited from the developed countries) have been compensa- tion for earnings shortfalls and mechanisms to offset price declines. The best known examples of earnings compensation include the IMF's Compen- satory Financing Facility (CFF) and the European Community's STABEX system. The CFF, established in 1963, has loaned more than $4 billion at concessional rates to LDCs suffering from declines in their overall commodity export earnings. The newer EC STABEX has provided about $200 million in interest-free loans or grants to certain African, Caribbean, and Pacific LDCs for shortfalls in about 20 primary commodity exports; in contrast to CFF loans, these payments occur even if losses on one commodity are offset by gains on others. Especially in the last few years, LDCs have increasingly drawn from one or the other facility. Devices to stabilize prices include international commodity agreements (ICAs) and the related creation of buffer stocks. The G-77 platform in this area focuses on an Integrated Program for Commodities (IPC) and the Common Fund. Since discussions on the IPC began in 1976, little progress has been made toward new ICAs because of a range of technical and political barriers. The lackluster IPC record repeats the experience of the IMF's Buffer Stock Financing Facility; indeed, only one ICA has made use of the funds in this latter facility since its creation in 1969. These difficulties in creating ICAs and buffer stocks will affect progress toward the Common Fund, negotiations for which resume on 14 November. Economists at the international financial institutions in the developed countries and-in some instances-even in the LDCs agree that price stabilization is a very blunt instrument for Third World aid. Partly in recognition of this fact, the Germans have been especially eager to drop the Common Fund concept in favor of a broader set of stabex schemes. Recently, they have again been lobbying for a global stabex that they had proposed at earlier stages of the Common Fund dialogue. The other Europeans are not eager to simultaneously finance the EC STABEX, the Common Fund, and the proposed West German global scheme. Nevertheless, a convergence of interests of the Germans and Japanese on stabex proposals could broaden the ongoing discussions of commodity earnings. The Japan-ASEAN Talks An expression of interest by the five ASEAN LDCs in a 25-commodity, $500- million facility led to serious discussions on a possible stabex at the Japan-ASEAN summit in August 1977. In the euphoria of that occasion, Prime Minister Fukuda pledged to move forward on proposals for regional commodity arrangements. The first 18 SECRET Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 such detailed proposal-still the only substantive document to emerge from the talks-appeared late in fall 1977 and is under scrutiny by the Japanese. Continuing informal discussions were capped by an "experts" meeting in Jakarta on 29-30 September of this year. At the next formal round, scheduled as part of a Japan-ASEAN conference in December, Tokyo expects to examine answers to a series of probing questions it tabled at the September meeting. Progress at this session is likely to be slow while both sides weigh worldwide developments on the Common Fund and on a variety of bilateral issues. Some basic differences persist between Japan and the ASEAN countries on stabex issues: Commodity Coverage. The current ASEAN proposal requires compensa- tion for earnings shortfalls in each of 17 commodity lines (including tin, already covered by a commodity agreement, and practically all of ASEAN's major exports except rubber). In this the design differs from the recent West German proposals for broader systems that would base compensation on declines in net earnings from a basket of exports. Japan reportedly is still considering the latter, much less costly basket approach and would, in any event, probably insist on narrowing the set of commodites covered. Financial Base. Early in the talks, ASEAN suggested a first round figure of $400 million to $500 million as the likely cost of its stabex scheme. Although financial limits apparently have not been formally discussed, Japan could seek quotas for each country, as in the CFF, or for the entire operation for a period of years, as in the EC STABEX. Alternatively, the financial base could be narrowed by limited commodity coverage, stringent threshold provisions, and hard credit terms. Whatever the arrangement, Japan will probably not allow the maximum financial requirements of the stabex scheme to approach the ASEAN figure. Terms of Compensation. In the ASEAN design, earnings shortfalls for exports to Japan trigger compensation in the form of interest-free, uncondi- tional loans. These are to be repaid within five years only if improved export conditions in the affected commodity permit. Japan will probably insist, however, on no better than concessional interest rates and a less open-ended amortization schedule. Impact and Interests The stabex talks touch on a variety of economic and political interests. Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand-currently major exporters of such commodities as Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 timber, rice, cassava, coconut and palm oils, tin, and copper-see fairly immediate gains from the proposed arrangement with Japan. Indonesia, whose export earnings are now derived 70 percent from petroleum, faces the propsect of a fairly rapid decline in that share in the 1980s; accordingly, it favors a regional stabex as yet another means of evening out its revenues for development. Singapore, a net importer of most of the commodities proposed for the scheme, would gain less but would not stand in the way of its regional allies. From among this cast, Malaysia and Indonesia-both aspirants for regional political leadership-have shown the most interest in a stabex. Still clouding discussions of the ASEAN stabex is the unresolved status of the Common Fund. Malaysia, usually the most concerned with commodity exports, publicly endorses the stabex scheme as complementary to a Common Fund and will provide the staff support necessary to pursue both proposals over the next several months. Indonesia, a strong political force in the Common Fund talks, will probably go on playing second to Malaysia in orchestration of the stabex discussions. The other ASEAN countries have shown less interest in both institutions; regional solidarity- such as has moved Thailand to a more aggressive Common Fund stance as this year's regional spokesman-will probably supplement economic interests in keeping the individual countries lined up behind group positions on both fronts. Like West Geman Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, who has pledged to attend a controversial North-South summit in Jamaica this December, Prime Minister Fukuda has shown interest in new ways to reaffirm commitment to Third World and regional goals. Despite the scant achievements of the ASEAN stabex talks so far, Fukuda could step in at the eleventh hour to resolve interministerial differences that now block agreement. Pressure to move in this direction will be greatest over the next few months as both developed and developing countries prepare for UNCTAD V (1979's most important North-South event) and try to compensate for any LDC disappoint- ment from the Common fund talks. Japanese acceptance of the ASEAN stabex scheme would have serious implica- tions for other facets of the North-South dialogue. Besides giving a new boost to West German arguments for substitution of a global stabex for a Common Fund, it would put heat on the United States (as another major ASEAN trading partner) to finance this additional commodity earnings scheme. Moreover, it would likely stimulate further demands from other LDCs not presently covered by stabex programs. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 SUDAN: ARAB LARGESS BREEDS FINANCIAL PROBLEMS Sudan is facing several years of severe balance-of-payments constraints on economic growth despite recent IMF help and Arab and Western debt reschedulings. Ironically, the payments bind stems from problems associated with Arab efforts to transform Sudan into a major food supplier. Large Arab aid inflows in recent years have required matching local funds and have often necessitated sizable investment in roads, railroads, and ports. This investment effort has left Khartoum with serious foreign exchange shortfalls and high domestic inflation. Under pressure from Arab creditors, the Numayri government finally has accepted stringent IMF guidelines to moderate its development effort and get its foreign and domestic finances into better shape. While economic growth is likely to average no more than 2 to 3 percent in the next several years, the reform program and increased agricultural yields from new farming and livestock projects should result in a sounder external financial position in the early 1980s. Agricultural Resources and Arab Interest Arab interest in the Sudan lies primarily in the country's considerable agricultural potential. Only 8 percent (6.4 million hectares) of the country's 80 million hectares of cultivable land is farmed. Irrigation from the Nile, which now affects only about one- fifth of the cultivated areas, could be doubled. Cotton from the irrigated land, groundnuts, gum arabic, sesame, and food products are the principal crops. Talk of Western retaliation against Arab food imports during the 1973/74 oil embargo focused Arab attention on Sudan. In 1976, a plan was formalized by the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development (a 12-member Kuwaiti-based organiza- tion) to combine Arab oil money with Sudanese resources and Western technology to develop Sudan into the "bread basket" of the Arab world. Although this plan has not yet gotten off the ground because inter-Arab rivalries have caused administrative tie- ups, more than $375 million in Arab project aid has been disbursed bilaterally since 1973, helping to support a number of irrigation and other agricultural development projects. Saudi Arabia has been by far the major Arab donor (70 percent), followed far behind by the United Arab Emirates. Total Arab aid was about equal to Western aid in 1974-77. Balance-of-Payments Problems The development drive sparked by Arab aid has increasingly strained Sudan's external financial position. A principal problem has been Arab demands for substantial matching funds before aid is disbursed. For instance, Sudan is financing 25 percent of the $270 million cost of the Rahad, one of the country's largest irrigation projects. In Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 addition, before many of the agricultural and food processing projects can be carried out, Khartoum must develop transportation and communication facilities to overcome potential bottlenecks. Relying on its access to seemingly inexhaustible oil wealth, Sudan has gone overboard in foreign borrowing to help pay for the development program. As a result, foreign debt has risen from $335 million at yearend 1973 to almost $1.5 billion today, Funding the domestic cost of development has led to a growing budget deficit, which has been financed largely through local bank borrowing. The resulting inflation-25 to 30 percent in fiscal year 1978 (July 1977 - June 1978)-has undermined Sudan's export competitiveness, while outlays for construction projects have added to consumer demand for imported manufactures. The current account deficit began to escalate sharply in FY 1975, ebbed temporarly in FY 1977, then shot up again in FY 1978. Imports, principally from Western Europe, the United States, and Japan, which reached $935 million by FY 1978, have been increasing steadily in the past year and a half. At the same time, Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Sudan: Status of Planned Major Facilities Infrastructure Current Status Foreign Financing (percent) Jonglei Canal ....... ......... .................. Ongoing 46 Port $vdan-Khartoum road .................. ...... Ongoing 43 Railraod modernization ..... .................. Planning stage 74 Construction of Port Suakin Planning stage NA Sennar-Damazin road ............................. Ongoing 67 Agriculture Upper Atbara dam .................................... Planning stage 68 Rahad irrigation project ............................ Ongoing 75 Damazin agricultural and animal produc- tion project ......................................... Ongoing 40 Khashm el-Girba irrigation project expan- sion ... ............................................... Ongoing 38 Tea and coffee production in south ........ Planning stage 47 Industry Kenana sugar project................................... Ongoing 100 Starch and glucose factories ...................... Planning stage 50 Cotton mills ......... ..... ..:........................... Ongoing 61 Edible oil processing plants.................. Planning stage 75 export earnings have leveled off, partly because of the government's policy-at odds with the Arab goals of raising Sudan's farm exports-of encouraging import substitu- tion crops at the expense of export crops. Although the value of cotton exports doubled between 1975 and 1977, this was due more to higher world cotton prices than to expanded production; the volume of cotton exports in 1977 was up only 20 percent over the 1975 figure. International reserves began falling in 1975 and never recovered. The situation became acute in 1977 when Arab bilateral aid fell 60 percent from the 1976 peak. By mid-1978, reserves had dropped by $100 million, to about $22 million, less than half a month's imports, and arrears on import payments had accumulated to an estimated $850 million. These factors were reflected in Sudan's near-zero credit rating; most major international commercial banks were refusing new letters of credit to the Bank of Sudan. In July 1978, shortages caused by the severe foreign exchange crunch were compounded by heavy flooding in the Gezira, the country's principal agricultural region. Together, these events threatened the inflow of both capital and consumer goods, while aggravating public unrest. Supplies of petroleum and spare parts, as well Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Trade Balance ................................................ -246 23 -279 -470 Exports, f.o.b . ............................................ 508 665 656 667 Imports, c.i.f ............................................... 754 642 935 1,137 Net services ........ _....................... .... .... _..... -63 -49 -29 -70 Current account balance ................................ -309 -26 -308 -540 Debt amortization .......................................... -112 - 65 - 90 -235 Accumulation of arrearsI .... .......... .... ........ -5 -405 -450 0 Financial gap .................................................. -426 -496 -848 -775 Financing the gap .._........_ ........................... 330 499 776 650 Official nonmonetary capital .................. 369 94 287 650 Other capital .............................................. -44 0 39 0 Current arrears ........................................... 5 405 450 0 Change in reserves ...... ......... ._....... __..... ...... -96 3 -72 -125 Imports are understated because dataexclude remittancesof consumer goods by Sudanese working abroad; these are included under "Net services." Data are for fiscal years, July-June. Estimated. Projected. as fertilizers and insecticides essential for the cotton crop, became critically short. Iraq and Kuwait interrupted shipments of petroleum several times when Sudan was unable to keep arrearages from rising. Both industry and rail transportation were running at roughly half capacity for lack of equipment and spare parts. In mid-1978, Khartoum finally accepted under heavy Arab pressure an IMF austerity regimen to ease Sudan's financial problems. The program includes: ? A 20-percent devaluation, announced last June. ? A reduced rate of increase in government current expenditures. ? A trimming of development expenditures. ? A reversal of government policy in favor of export crops, particularly cotton, at the expense of import substitutes such as wheat. In return, the IMF has approved two loans worth $63 million. Negotiations for a formal standby agreement are scheduled for later this fall, at which time Sudanese compliance with the first part of the agreement will be reviewed. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 The IMF accord has opened the way for massive assistance from other sources. Saudi Arabia subsequently provided a $300 million loan to purchase crude oil and another $50 million for balance-of-payments support. Other donors have committed balance-of-payments support of $238 million. In addition, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait Total .._ ................................................................. 588 Saudi Arabia .................................................... 350 Arab Monetary Fund ...................................... 16 IBRD ................................................................ 25 Kuwait .............................................................. 19 Abu Dhabi ........................................................ 10 France .............................................................. 22 Japan ................................................................ 15 IMF .................................................................. 63 IMF compensatory financing ........................ 26 have rescheduled their share of Sudan's official debt on highly favorable terms. European nations have rescheduled $150 million in official obligations, and Western commercial banks have rescheduled $280 million to $300 million in private loans. Although the total of new loans and debt relief-more than $1 billion-readily covers the $540 million current account deficit projected for FY 1979 and eases the immediate debt amortization squeeze, the need for economic austerity will not diminish. A time lag of at least two years can be expected before the exchange rate adjustment and the tightened fiscal policies have positive effects on the balance of payments. Even the IMF-sponsored incentives to boost exports, which include a restructuring of costs and prices, will take considerable time to bear fruit. Last July's floods will further slow recovery of the Sudanese financial position, helping to keep exports flat. Although 95 percent of the 1978/79 cotton crop reportedly has been replanted, Khartoum must still find financing, for fertilizers and insecticides to replace those used on the flooded crop. Despite the receipt of $26 million from the IMF to cover an estimated one-third of the export short-fall resulting from the flooding, damage to the transportation system will hamper growth through FY 1979, These problems, together with internal and external financial constraints, probably will hold GNP growth to 2 to 3 percent for the next couple of years. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Cuba is undertaking a massive expansion of its infant citrus industry aimed, at least initially, at boosting export earnings from CEMA countries. Realization of production goals would enable Cuba by the mid-1980s to capture at least half of the rapidly growing CEMA market for fresh citrus. This market, which takes nearly one- sixth of the $2 billion in world exports, now is supplied mainly by Mediterranean countries. As Cuban shipments gain ground in CEMA, the Mediterranean suppliers will likely focus on the EC, increasing the difficulties for US growers in this latter market. Citrus Development Goals Cuba's citrus industry produced only 270,000 tons last year. Trees already planted, however, should yield crops of 550,000 tons by 1980 and 1.7 million tons by 1985. By 1985, even if Cuban citrus consumption should reach the targeted level of 60 kilograms per person per year-the world's highest-more than 1 million tons would be available for export. (World exports last year were roughly 7 million tons.) Realization of its 1985 production and export goals would enable Cuba to compete with the United States for the rank of second leading exporter of fresh citrus, after Spain. basic orchard units encompass 500 hectares; these are combined into farms of up to 28,000 hectares. Integrated with the new farms are secondary boarding schools-one 500-student school for each 500 hectares-whose students devote several hours a day to citrus cultivation and harvesting. Nearly 118,000 hectares already have been planted at a rate approaching 10 million trees a year. Most of the land developed for citrus cultivation is unsuitable for other crops. Cuban professional staffs appear to be well trained, though lacking experience. Rapid improvement in disease control and cultivation techniques have been noted, and the Cubans are believed capable of achieving their ambitious production goals. I he Cubans have been obtaining (through third country channels) ample supplies of all varieties of select US root stock, the world's best, and will therefore be producing a full line. The Cubans are besieging US growers and universities with requests for technical assistance while giving assurances that Cuba, with its output earmarked for CEMA nations, will not be a competitor of the United States. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Although the Cubans are aiming primarily at the fresh citrus market, they are also developing a processing capability. The two existing plants have a current processing capacity of 450 tons a day. A third plant is to be completed next year, and 12 more plants are planned for the next six years. A complete line of byproducts also is planned. The CEMA Market CEMA countries represent a large and rapidly growing market for fresh citrus. Their imports have grown an average 7 percent annually since 1970, compared with a growth rate of 3.4 percent for world citrus trade. At this rate, CEMA's citrus imports could double to about 2 million tons by 1985. Until the early 1980s, much of the increased demand will be supplied by the Mediterranean producers. Cuba sees in citrus a means of diversifying and expanding its limited export potential. Moreover, shipments to CEMA will help repay long-term industrial development aid. Although CEMA countries will prefer Cuba as a supplier to save on hard currency, sales by Mediterranean producers should not decline before 1984. If Cuba allocated a larger share of output to exports, Mediterranean losses would occur earlier. Italian citrus growers would be hurt the most; they now count on CEMA for three-fourths of their foreign citrus sales. Greece also would feel the impact; CEMA took two-thirds of Greek citrus exports in 1976. Other Mediterranean citrus exporters for whom CEMA has been a major market include Algeria (100 percent), Morocco (40 percent), Egypt (39 percent), and Turkey (30 percent). In the longer run, Cuba's citrus export capability will likely outstrip CEMA demand. By 1985, Havana intends to have 200,000 hectares of citrus groves, the equivalent of two-thirds of Florida's citrus acreage. These groves should yield an export volume of 6 million to 8 million tons by the mid-1990s; CEMA demand is projected to reach less than 4 million tons in 1985. Impact on US Growers Cuban citrus development could have a substantial impact on the US citrus industry. Even if Cuba failed to gain access to the US market, the industry could be hurt by sales to third country markets. The major threat could come from inroads into US sales to the EC, now one-fourth of the US total. As Mediterranean countries are squeezed from the CEMA citrus market in the early 1980s, they can be expected to push sales to EC nations. Cuba probably would divert sales from CEMA to the EC, as well as to Japan and Canada, only if hard currency needs became pressing. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Cuban citrus has some marked climatic advantages over US citrus. The Cuban fruit ripens up to three months earlier and is rarely hurt by the frosts that periodically decimate US citrus crops. Citrus production in the United States has leveled off since 1971 despite growing international demand. CUBA: NEW AFRICAN/MIDEAST AIR LINKS PLANNED * Cubana Airlines, Cuba's national air carrier, plans to expand its network of international services in the near term to several countries on the African con- tinent-Algeria, Ethiopia, Equatorial Guinea, Libya, and Mozambique-as well as to Iraq in the Middle East. Other points of service at a future date may include Syria and South Yemen. Cubana has tentatively scheduled the first phase of new services to begin in January 1979, about the same time that the airline reportedly will receive additional Soviet transport aircraft, including two long-range IL-62s. The expansion in airline service fits in with the extensive Soviet and Cuban involvement in African political and military affairs. Havana has not indicated any specific routes for the proposed service. We believe one possibility for three of the countries to be served would be a Havana-Algiers- Tripoli-Baghdad flight, which might include a refueling stop in Las Palmas in the Canaries. As for Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique, the most likely route would be an intermediate stop at Malabo in Equatorial Guinea on the existing route to Luanda, with operations beyond to Maputo, Mozambique. Any formal service to Addis Ababa could either operate as an extension of new service to north Africa or as an extension of some added service to Luanda. In addition to the broad Cuban military participation in the Horn and in southern Africa, political relations between Havana and each of the countries to be served have warmed perceptibly in the past few years. The increased contacts have led to plans for expanding technical assistance, particularly to Iraq, Libya, and Mozambique. Because of these improving ties, the Castro government decided to augment its slender air links with friendly countries in the area. Havana probably is optimistic in indicating its intention to inaugurate all these services by January, especially to those countries where a route requires a time- This article was produced jointly by the Office of Economic Research and the Office of Regional and Political Analysis. 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 consuming request for overflight rights. We do not know of any particular overflight requests by Cuba at this time. Factors Behind Expansion Cuba's economic relations with these countries, while still relatively small, have increased considerably over the past few years. For example, Cuban sugar exports to Algeria, Libya, Iraq, and Ethiopia have nearly quadrupled since 1974 to over 250,000 tons-about 15 percent of Cuba's total sugar exports to the world free market in 1978. These sugar sales have helped offset Cuba's serious shortage of hard currency. These earnings, coupled with the probable hard currency payments for Cuban technical assistance from at least some of the more prosperous Arab states, make many of these countries of increasing importance to Cuba. In addition to these commercial ties, the Castro government doubtless plans to use the new airlink to Addis Ababa to rotate troops-many of whom will soon have completed a year's service in Ethiopia. The new service will also allow the transport of civilian advisers, as part of Cuba's recently finalized plans to establish a large technical assistance program in Ethiopia. Similarly Havana is in the process of sending large numbers of public health and other technical specialists to Iraq and Libya and is expanding considerably in its development assistance to Mozambique. Cubana now operates 14 scheduled international flights weekly, to 15 foreign cities over a route network of 27,500 nautical miles. With Havana as the hub, the service features routes to Europe and the Caribbean, with additional flights to Canada and black Africa. In Europe, IL-62 flights operate three times a week to Madrid, one of the flights going beyond to East Berlin and another to Prague. A Havana-Montreal flight operates twice weekly, also using IL-62s. Service to Latin America includes weekly flights between Havana and Mexico City and between Havana and Lima via Panama City. In the Caribbean, Cubana has twice weekly turboprop IL-18 flights to Kingston; one of the flights continues on to Barbados, Port of Spain, and Georgetown. Scheduled Cubana operations to Africa amount to little at present. In addition to a twice weekly IL-62 flight between Havana and Luanda (with a stopoff at Cape Verde), occasional flights have been made to Luanda via either Conakry or Freetown. These flights have expedited the flow of Cuban military, technical, and general support personnel into the military confrontation arena. 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Cubana Airlines: International Route Network, October 1978* East Berlin .1rague Havana Luanda *Cubana flights between Havana and Luanda have used varying routes and intermediate stops during the past two years. he announced new service to Iraq would give recognition to this nation's ties to Soviet and Cuban aspirations both in the Mideast and on the African continent. Aircraft Inventory Cubana's civil air fleet has been expanded and modernized over the past 12 months through the purchase of four Soviet-built IL-62 jets * for longer haul international services, and more recently, through the purchase of six YAK-40 trijets Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Cuba's Transport Aircraft Inventory Jet .............................................................................. 10 IL-62 ........... . ..................... .......... ..................... 41 YAK-40 ... ............................................ 6 Other ........ . ....................... ................. ............ ...... 28 IL-18 ....... ......... .............. 4 Bristol-Britannia ...................................................... 4 IL-14 ... ...................................................................... 11 AN-24 ..... ............ ..... 9 for domestic service. The Cubana inventory of major transport aircraft is shown in the table. 25X1 Vietnam's Military Demands Add to Economic Woes Sporadic fighting on the Cambodia border since late last year and recent moves to improve defensive capabilities along the northern border with China are further hampering Vietnam's postwar economic recovery. * Since the 1.975 takeover, the economy has been hobbled by bureaucratic inefficiency, lack of skilled managers, absence of production incentives, a poorly developed infrastructure, and unusually bad weather affecting agricultural production. 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 The situation along both borders has diverted troops from their major postwar reconstruction and development role. The military was to provide much of the manpower, security, and equipment to open up Vietnam's agricultural frontier so that food production could be boosted. Many important-but not crucial-land reclama- tion, irrigation, and rail and road projects are being delayed. The military situation is also occupying much of the time and energy of Vietnam's thinly stretched government leaders, slowing the functioning of the centrally planned economy. Hanoi officials have been unable to give full attention to difficult decisions on foreign economic relations and on domestic economic policies. Consequently, implementation of foreign aid projects is lagging and needed economic reforms are being delayed. The heightened readiness along the border so far has required only small additional budgetary outlays for military pay, food, and equipment. Deliveries of military aid from the USSR this year are up slightly but are still well below those noted during the Vietnam war. We have no evidence that priority military shipments are substantially displacing the transport of civilian goods through Vietnam's already overtaxed ports. In some cases, however, transport equipment intended for foreign- financed aid projects has been commandeered by the military. 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Secret Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Assessment Center Economic Indicators Weekly Review ER EI 78-044 2 November 1978 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 This publication is prepared for the use of U.S. Government officials. The format, coverage and contents of the publication are designed to meet the specific requirements of those users. U.S. Government officials may obtain additional copies of this document directly or through liaison channels from the Central Intelligence Agency. Non-U.S. Government users may obtain this along with similar CIA publications on a subscription basis by addressing inquiries to: Document Expediting (DOCEX) Project Exchange and Gift Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540 Non-U.S. Government users not interested in the DOCEX Project subscription service may purchase reproductions of specific publications on an individual basis from: Photoduplication Service Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 1. The Economic Indicators Weekly Review provides up-to-date information on changes in the domestic and external economic activities of the major non- Communist developed countries. To the extent possible, the Economic Indicators Weekly Review is updated from press ticker and Embassy reporting, so that the results are made available to the reader weeks-or sometimes months-before receipt of official statistical publications. US data are provided by US government agencies. 2. Source notes for the Economic Indicators Weekly Review are revised every few months. The most recent date of publication of source notes is 16 February 1978. Comments and queries regarding the Economic Indicators Weekly Review are welcomed. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 BIG SIX Fd roved For COMPOSITE INDICATORS 140 130 120.E INDEX: 1970=100, seasonally adjusted Semilogarithmic Scale Percent JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT 1973 ApprTMIXor Release124.9iN07/28 : CIA-- 1976 T7 0T00702A0p09 050002-5 1978 llncluding Japan, West Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Canada. A-2 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Trade Balance 4.0 Industrial Production Big Six United States Consumer Prices AVERAGE ANNUAL Percent Change GROWTH RATE SINCE LATEST from Previous 1 Year 3 Months MONTH Month 1970 Earlier Earlier2 Percent, seasonally adjusted, annual rate Billion US $, f.o.b., seasfially adjusted Unemployment Rate Big Five 3 Months LATEST MONTH 1 Year Earlier Earlier Big Six JUL 78 0.9 9.2 6.6 7.9 Trade Balance United States JUL 78 0.7 6.8 7.7 1 1.0 Big Six United States LATEST MILLION CUMULATIVE (MILLION US $) MONTH US $ 1978 1977 Change JUL 78 3,146 31,681 16,184 15,497 JUL 78 -2,987 -19,355 -13,623, -5,732 w ear Re eor previos aseu2004n/07/ so ally ad usteRDP80T00702A000900050002 -5 rate, 2Average for latest 3 mdn~ll? RRdrci08}?ddifh A-3 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION INDEX: 1970=100, seasonally adjusted West Germany 130 120 110 /' 113 JAN APR JUL OCT JA APR JUL CT A APR N P C APR JUL OCT approved for Release 2~'b4/~`~/2 :Geld-R ~8~0`tOa1 0A 2~ O6Oa02-5 1973 1974 1975 1976 1978 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 United Kingdom 140 Canada 1 140 JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT United States Japan West Germany France Percent AVERAGE ANNUAL Change GROWTH RATE SINCE from LATEST Previous 1 Year 3 Months MONTH Month 1970 Earlier Earlieri Percent Change AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWTH RATE SINCE LATEST Previous ' 1 Year 3 Months MONTH Month 1970 Earlier Earlieri Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 iAverage for latest 3 months c pared with average for previous 3 months. JAN APRN 1JUL~ ~~ -OCT Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE PERCENT United States JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 Approved For Release 2004/07/2 6 CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 United Kingdom Italy (quarterly) 3 Canada JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 THOUSANDS OF PERSONS UNEMPLOYED United States Japan West Germany France 1 Year 3 Months Earlier Earlier SEP 78 6,002 6,668 5,754 JUL 78 1,260 1,200 1,220 SEP 78 986 1,035 986 SEP 78 1,235 1,132 1,186 3.8 United Kingdom Italy Canada 8.5 OCT 78 1,360 1,432 1,371 711 III 1,658 1,692 1,455 SE:P 78 946 887 944 NOTE: Data are seasonally adjusted. Unemployment rates for France are estimated. The rates shown for Japan and Canada are roughly comparable to US rates. For 1975-78, the rates for France and the United Kingdom should be increased by 5 percent and 15 percent respectively, and those for West Germany decreased by 20 percent to be roughly comparable with US rates. Beginning in 1977, Italian rates should be decreased by 50 percent to be roughly comparable to US rates. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : QAI9-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 CONSUMER PRICE INFLATION Percent, seasonally adjusted, annual rate' United States 2.9 Ayeracge Annual Rate of Inflation 1961-1972 West Germany France ._ _...~.___ JAN R-,.,...._.... JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR a JUL OCT 1AN- APR JUL UL OCT OCT JAN APR JUL OCT 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 'Three-month average compared'' h pprove err+orhF~elease 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 /ap A-8 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 United Kingdom 4.T Canada 4.2 JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR Percent Change from LATEST Previous MONTH Month SEP 78 AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWTH RATE SINCE 1970 1 Year 3 Months Earlier Earlier2 JUL 78 0.7 AUG 78 0.1 LATEST MONTH United Kingdom SEP 78 Italy SEP 78 Canada SEP 78 2Average for latest 3 months compared with average for previous 3 months, seasonally adjusted at annual rate. Approved For Release 2004/07/28: CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT Percent AVERAGE ANNUAL Change GROWTH RATE SINCE from Previous 1970 1 Year 3 Months Month Earlier Earlier2 1.0 13.1 12.2 13.5 0.1 7.6 8.6 8.7 United States Japan West Germany France United Kingdom Italy Canada ' Seasonaly adjusted. Average Annual Growth Rate Since Percent Change ------- Latest from Previous 1 Year Previous Quarter Quarter 1970 Earlier Quarter 78 II 1.8 3.2 4.0 7.4 78 II 1.1 5.4 5.3I 4.4 78 II 78 I 77 IV 78 I 78 II Nonresidential; constant prices Average Annual Growth Rate Since United States Japan West Germany France United Kingdom Italy Canada ' Seasonally adjusted. Percent Change -.-- Latest from Previous I Year Previous Quarter Quarter 1970 Earlier Quarter 78 II I 3.6 I 3.0 7.4 1 15.1 78 II 78 II 77 IV 78 I United States Japan West Germany France United Kingdom Canada Eurodollars Average Annual Growth Rate Since Percent Charge - Latest from Previous 1 Year 3 Months Month Month 1970 Earlier Earlier United States Jul 78 -0.3 3.1 3.5 1.9 Japan Apr 78 4.0 9.9 4.3 24.8 West Germany Jun 78 1.6 2.6 3.3 -3.2 France Jan 78 9.9 0 1.0 10.5 United Kingdom Sep 78 -1.2 1.3 6.8 12.8 Italy May 78 12.1 3.5 3.5 12.1 Canada Aug 78 3.7 4.1 1.3 1.1 ' Seasonaly adjusted. 'Average for latest 3 months compared with average for previous 3 months. WAGES IN MANUFACTURING' United States Jul 78 Japan Apr 78 West Germany 78 I France 77 IV United Kingdom Jun 78 Italy Jun 78 Canada Jul 78 1.2 0.3 0.9 'Hourly earnings (seasonally adjusted) for the United States, Japan, and Canada; hourly wage rates far others. West German and French data refer to the beginning of the quarter. 'Average for latest 3 months compared with that far previous 3 months. 1 Year 3 Months 1 Month Latest Date Earlier Earlier Earlier Oct 25 Oct 27 Oct 25 Oct 27 Oct 25 Oct 25 Oct 25 Average Annual Growth Rate Since Percent Change -- Latest from Previous 1 Year 3 Months Period Period 1970 Earlier Earlier ' 3.82 4.08 7.00 8.50 10.71 4.93 9.92 7.30 7.75 9.91 8.38 8.41 Approved For Release 2OG4/07128- CIA--R?P8M0702A00090005090 -5 A-10 Commercial paper Call money Interbank loans (3 months) Call money Sterling interbank loans (3 months) Finance paper Three-month deposits ___e-_ - GNP Approved For Releas2004/07/28 : CIJ~f~ 85A ~0 - EXPORT PRIC Iff proved For Release 2004/07/28 IJg$0p2A000900050002-5 us $ National Currency Average Average Annual Growth Rate Since Annual Growth Rate Since Percent Change Percent Change Latest from Previous 1 Year 3 Months Latest from Previous 1 Year 3 Months Month Month 1970 Earlier Earlier Month Month 1970 Earlier Earlier United States Jul 78 - 0.4 9.6 9.5 15.7 United States Jul 78 - 0.4 9.6 9.5 15.7 Japan Jul 78 1.0 11.7 26.8 37.9 Japan Jul 78 - 5.8 3.8 -4.3 -8.8 West Germany Jun 78 1.7 11.5 12.9 -4.0 West Germany Jun 78 0.7 3.9 -0.1 4.9 France Jun 78 2.2 11.5 13.6 7.8 France Jun 78 0.6 8.8 5.3 -2.8 United Kingdom Sep 78 1.7 12.3 21.8 41.9 United Kingdom Sep 78 0.8 15.1 8.3 9.6 Italy Jun 78 0.5 10.8 8.1 2.7 Italy Jun 78 -0.8 15.3 4.9 4.6 Canada Jul 78 0.9 8.3 0.6 10.3 Canada Jul 78 1.5 9.3 6.6 3.8 IMPORT PRICES OFFICIAL RESERVES National Currency Average Billion US $ Annual Growth Rate Since Latest Month Percent Change I Year 3 Months Latest from Previous 1 Year 3 Months End of Billion USE Jun 1970 Earlier Earlier Month Month 1970 Earlier Earlier United States Jun 78 18.9 14.5 19.2 19.2 United States Jul 78 0.6 12.6 7.3 2.9 Japan Aug 78 29.2 4.1 17.8 27.7 Japan Jul 78 -6.6 5.8 -20.9 -22.7 West Germany Jul 78 41.1 8.8 35.1 41.3 West Germany Jun 78 -1.6 3.0 -5.9 -12.5 France Apr 78 10.6 4.4 10.0 10.2 France Jun 78 -0.6 9.1 0.2 -9.1 United Kingdom Aug 78 17.4 2.8 15.0 17.3 United Kingdom Sep 78 0.9 17.1 4.3 3.8 Italy Aug 78 14.9 4.7 10.5 12.2 Italy Jun 78 -0.7 18.7 1.8 2.4 Canada Sep 78 3.7 9.1 4.8 4.7 Canada Jul 78 2.3 9.7 11.3 17.4 CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE ' BASIC BALANCE ' Current and Long-Term Capital Transactions Cumulative (Million US E) Cumulative (Million US E) Latest Latest Period Million US $ 1978 1977 Change Period Million US $ 1978 1977 Change United States' 78 I -6,954 - 6,954 -4,158 -2,796 United States No longer published' Japan Aug 78 7 1 0,803 5,300 5,503 Japan Aug 78 -1,268 4,867 3,779 1,088 West Germany Jul 78 -868 2,831 1,406 1,425 West Germany Jul 78 -881 1,915 -2,363 4,278 France 78 I -84 -84 -1,628 1,543 France 78 1 -863 -863 -1,889 1,025 United Kingdom 78 I -803 -803 -896 94 United Kingdom 78 I -326 -326 543 -869 Italy 78 I 288 288 -1,025 1,313 Italy 77 III 2,427 N.A. N.A. N.A. Canada 78 II -1,201 -2,381 -2,658 277 Canada 78 II 883 327 -557 884 ' Converted to US dollars at the current market rates of exchange. Converted to US dollars at the current market rates of exchange. ' As recommended by the Advisory Committee on the Presentation of Balance of Payments ' Seasonally adjusted. Statistics, the Department of Commerce no longer publishes a basic balance. TRADE-WEIGHTED EXCHANGE RATES' EXCHANGE R ATES Spot Rate As of 27 Oct 78 Percent Change from Percent Change from As of 27 Oct 78 US $ 1 Year 3 Months 1 Year 3 Months Per Unit 19 Mar 73 Earlier Earlier 20 Oct 78 19 Mar 73 Earlier Earlier 20 Oct 78 Japan (yen) 0.0056 45.80 41.97 5.06 2.32 United States -6.73 -11.86 -3.88 -1.86 West Germany 0.5682 59.84 28.92 15.30 2.64 Japan 46.60 35.37 2.59 1.48 (Deutsche mark) West Germany 37.01 7.70 5.46 0.03 France (franc) 0.2466 11.13 19.77 8.17 3.42 France -10.09 -1.83 -2.56 0.91 United Kingdom 2.0630 -16.56 16.59 7.16 3.25 United Kingdom -29.33 -0.37 -0.90 1.09 (pound sterling) Italy -44.04 -8.66 -3.90 -0.69 Italy (lira) 0.0013 -28.65 10.56 5.72 1.78 Canada - 17.64 -10.94 -4.77 0.28 Canada (dollar) 0.8515 -15.13 -6.56 - 3.14 0.84 Weighting is based on each listed country's trade with 16 other industrialized countries to Approved For Release 2004/07/28 1a rg the maja `urren`ies. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80TOO702AO00900050002-5 Exports to (f.o.b.) Big Other Com- World Seven OECD OPEC munist Other UNITED STATES 1975 .......................... 107.65 46.94 16.25 10.77 3.37 29.82 1976 .......................... 115.01 51.30 17.68 12.57 3.64 29.44 1977 .......................... 120.17 53.92 18.53 14.02 2.72 30.98 1978 .......................... 1st Qtr ................ 30.94 13.65 4.60 3.76 1.00 7.93 Apr ...................... 12.06 5.40 1.68 1.38 0.42 3.17 JAPAN 1975 .......................... 55.73 16.56 6.07 8.42 5.16 15.87 1976 .......................... 67.32 22.61 8.59 9.27 4.93 17.84 1977 ........... ....... ..._. 81.11 28.02 9.73 12.03 5.32 26.01 1978 1st Qtr ................ 22.11 7.83 2.39 3.35 1.32 7.22 Apr ...................... 7.89 2.80 0.80 1.19 0.57 2.53 WEST GERMANY 1975 .......................... 91.70 28.33 36.44 6.78 8.81 11.05 1976 .......................... 103.63 33.44 41.86 8.25 8.72 11.04 1977 .......................... 119.28 39.01 48.00 10.78 8.59 12.90 1978 1st Qtr ................ 32.45 FRANCE 1975 .......................... 52.87 20.00 15.50 4.90 3.13 8.61 1976 .......................... 57.05 22.49 16.15 5.08 3.23 8.75 1977 .......................... 65.00 25.90 18.19 5.97 3.00 11.94 1978 1st Qtr ................ 18.49 7.66 5.07 1.57 0.66 3.53 Apr ...................... 6.74 2.82 1.90 0.56 0.28 1.18 UNITED KINGDOM 1975 .......................... 44.03 12.55 16.59 4.55 1.56 8.64 1976 .......................... 46.12 14.03 17.53 5.13 1.39 7.92 1977.......................... 57.44 16.99 22.56 6.78 1.63 9.48 1978 1st Qtr ................ 16.86 5.09 6.27 2.03 0.55 2.92 Apr ...................... 5.75 1.73 2.19 0.74 0.18 0.91 ITALY 1975 .......................... 34.82 15.61 7.86 3.72 2.46 4.67 1976 .......................... 36.96 17.41 8.69 4.23 2.18 3.96 1977 .......................... 45.04 20.92 10.20 5.85 2.45 5.62 1978 1st Qtr ................ 10.80 CANADA 1975 .......................... 33.84 26.30 1.73 0.71 1.20 2.00 1976 .......................... 40.18 32.01 2.03 0.81 1.25 2.09 1977 .......................... 42.98 34.77 2.13 0.94 1.06 4.08 1978 1st Qtr ................ 10.75 8.78 0.55 0.23 0.22 0.97 Apr ...................... 4.20 3.44 0.16 0.08 0.07 0.45 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80TOO702AO00900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 UNITED STATES 1975 .......................... 1976 .......................... 1977 .......................... 1978 1st Qtr ................ Apr ...................... JAPAN 1975_ ........................ 1976 .......................... 1977 .......................... 1978 1st Qtr ................ Apr ...................... WEST GERMANY 1975 .......................... 1976 .......................... 1977 .......................... 1978 1st Qtr ................ FRANCE 1975 .......................... 1976 .......................... 1977 .......................... 1978 1st Qtr ................ Apr ...................... UNITED KINGDOM 1975 .......................... 1976 .......................... 1977 .......................... 1978 1st Qtr ................ Apr ...................... ITALY 1975 .......................... 1976 .......................... 1977 .......................... 1978 1st Qtr ................ CANADA 1975 .......................... 1976 .......................... 1977 .......................... 1978 1st Qtr ................ Apr ...................... World Big Seven Other OECD OPEC Com- munist Other 103.42 49.81 8.83 18.70 0.98 25.08 129.57 60.39 9.75 27.17 1.16 31.09 156.70 70.48 11.08 35.45 1.22 38.47 43.14 20.39 3.51 8.15 0.47 10.62 15.42 7.54 1.27 2.73 0.18 3.70 57.85 16.93 6.08 19.40 3.36 12.05 64.89 17.58 7.78 21.88 2.91 14.72 71.33 18.87 7.93 24.33 3.41 16.79 18.32 5.04 2.06 6.46 0.87 3.89 6.28 1.64 0.74 2.01 0.36 1.53 76.28 27.09 27.78 8.24 4.87 8.21 89.68 31.28 32.64 9.73 5.93 10.01 102.63 36.38 37.37 10.12 6.14 12.62 28.24 10.11 10.88 2.32 1.39 3.54 53.99 23.04 14.33 9.43 1.94 5.21 64.38 27.81 16.93 11.36 2.24 6.01 70.50 30.28 18.24 11.82 2.46 7.70 19.76 8.58 5.40 3.05 0.64 2.09 6.79 3.02 1.84 1.00 0.23 0.70 53.35 18.47 18.52 6.91 1.68 7.67 55.56 19.66 18.81 7.29 2.08 7.65 63.29 24.02 21.34 6.31 2.40 9.22 18.87 7.44 6.68 1.80 0.55 2.40 5.67 2.27 2.04 0.39 0.16 0.81 38.36 17.32 6.75 7.85 2.09 4.34 43.42 19.35 8.04 8.12 2.65 5.24 47.56 20.80 8.67 9.03 2.80 6.26 11.26 5.03 2.10 2.18 0.51 1.44 38.59 29.78 1.70 3.43 0.32 2.02 43.05 33.55 1.82 3.48 0.38 2.56 44.67 35.67 1.77 3.05 0.33 3.85 10.80 8.60 0.44 0.77 0.08 0.91 4.61 3.84 0.18 0.03 0.19 0.37 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 FOREIGN TRADE BILLION US $, f.o.b., seasonally adjusted 6.8 6.6 2.0 JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 A-14 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 United Kingdom United States Japan West Germany France AUG 78 Balance SEP 78 Balance AUG 78 Balance JUL 78 Balance 13,429 104,054 91,352 13.9% 15 120 126,721 10Q 105 19 1% -1,691 22,667 -17,953 -4,714 8,146 62,499 51,820 20.6% 6.023 43.994 41.055 7.2% 2,123 18,505 10,765 7,740 10,890 78,259 66,376 17.9% .9.,.203 64,60.4_ 5 ,039 17-4% 1,687 13,655 11,337 2,318 6,598 50,854 41,993 21.1% .6,842_ 50,7.35_. 44,40.1- 14,3?! -244 119 -2,409 2,527 6,043 50,004 41,298 21.1% 6,423 51,895 44,234 17.3% Balance -380 -1,891 -2,936 1,044 4 480 33 333 29 145 14 4% AUG 78 , 3,787 , 31,244 , 28,992 . 7.8% Balance 693 2,089 153 1,936 Canada AUG 78 3,640 29,739 27,962 6.4% 3,478 28.071 26.672 5.2% Balance 162 1,668 1,289 379 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 A-15 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 FOREIGN TRADE PRICES IN US $1 United States West Germany INDEX: JAN 1975 =100 JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT 19AA3roved For#MM5se 2004/071129761A-RDP80T9ffD7A000900050M% lExport and import plots are based on five-month weighted moving averages. A-16 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL55 OCT JAN APRs JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT 117 Approved For elease 2004/6S 6CIA-RDP80 (W7 2A0009000 R(T( g 11-78 ApprovSELECTEDe 2004/ 01AA-6DP?3URfV1Vg00050002-5 MONEY SUPPLY' INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION ' Average Average Annual Growth Rate Since Annual Growth Rote Sims Percent Change ----- Percent Change - West from Previous 1 Year 3 Months Latest from Previous 1 Year 3 Months Month Month 1970 Earlier Earner Period Period 1970 Earlier Earner' Brazil Mar 78 2.7 36.4 43.3 34.7 India Jun 78 -2.8 5.2 5.4 21.1 India Apr 78 2.5 14.0 16.2 13.0 South Korea Jun 78 -1.2 22.5 20.1 26.5 Iran May 78 0.4 29.0 21.4 66.2 Mexico May 78 -2.2 6.3 8.3 14.3 South Korea Jun 78 4.3 31.6 30.4 20.9 Nigeria 78 1 6.8 11.4 0.5 30.0 Mexico Jun 78 2.9 20.9 37.7 30.8 Taiwan Aug 78 2.9 16.3 33.6 40.6 Nigeria Mar 78 5.6 35.3 18.9 3.3 Taiwan May 78 0.6 25.1 32.8 40.8 Seasonally adjusted. Thailand Apr 78 - 3.2 13.3 12.5 32.3 previous 3 months. Average for latest 3 months compared with average for ' Seasonally adjusted. ' Average for latest 3 months compared with average for prevIous 3 months. CONSUMER PRICES WHOLESALE PRICES Average Anmat Growth Rote Since Average Percent Change Annual Growth Rate Since Latest from Previous 1 Year Percent Change Month Month 1970 Earner Latest from Previous 1 Year Month Month 1970 Earlier Brazil Jun 78 4.1 28.3 38.0 Brazil May 78 3.4 28.4 34.5 India May 78 0.3 7.4 1.6 India May 78 0.6 8.0 -2.8 Iran Jun 78 -0.1 12.2 10.2 Iran Jun 78 -1.3 10.7 9.3 South Korea Aug 78 0.3 14.5 13.5 South Korea Aug 78 0.1 15.7 10.9 Mexico Jul 78 1.7 15.2 18 3 Mexico Jul 78 1.1 16.5 17.3 Nigeria Dec 77 3.1 16.6 31.3 Taiwan Aug 78 0.4 8.1 1.6 Taiwan Aug 78 1.9 9.8 -0.6 Thailand Mar 78 -0.1 9.4 5.8 Thailand Jun 78 0.9 8.7 8.4 EXPORT PRICES OFFICIAL RESERVES us $ Million US $ Average Latest Month Annual Growth Rate Since 1 Year 3 Months Percent Change End of Minion US $ Jun 1970 Earlier Earlier Latest from Previous 1 Yea Month Month 1970 Earlier Brazil Feb 78 6,733 1,013 5,878 5,994 Brazil Feb 78 0.4 14.0 1.5 India Jun 78 6,140 1,006 4,559 5,823 India Sep 77 -2.7 10.0 18.4 Iran Aug 78 11,949 208 11,561 12,468 South Korea 78 1 0.7 8.7 7.7 South Korea Jul 78 4,298 602 3,656 4,138 Taiwan Jun 78 1.9 11.3 3.3 Mexico Mar 78 1,766 695 1,422 1,723 Thailand Dec 77 0.1 10.2 -7.8 Nigeria Aug 78 1,872 148 4,611 2,609 Taiwan Jun 78 1,462 531 1,411 1,433 Thailand Aug 78 2,295 978 1,992 2,129 Approved For Release 2004/07/28\: 16IA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Latest 3 Months Percent Change from 3 Months 1 Y ear Latest Period Earlier' Earlier 1978 1977 Change May 78 Exports 84.8 -3.7 4,743 4,979 -4.7% May 78 Imports 26.6 1.4 5,110 4,939 3.5% May 78 Balance -367 40 -407 Mar 78 Exports -19.6 -13.5 1,476 1,707 - 13.5% Mar 78 Imports -24.1 9.7 1,444 1,316 9.7% Mar 78 Balance 32 391 -358 Iran Jul 78 Exports 49.4 14.0 13,913 13,562 2.6% May 78 Imports - 1.6 1.6 5,705 5,259 8.5% May 78 Balance 4,087 4,871 -783 South Korea Jul 78 Exports 39.3 23.5 6,749 5,351 26.1% Jul 78 Imports 83.0 29.2 7,284 5,695 27.9% Jul 78 Balance -535 -344 -191 Mexico Jun 78 Exports - 7.3 8.4 2,412 2,162 11.6% Jun 78 Imports 91.3 26.8 2,934 2,340 25.4% Jun 78 Balance -522 -178 -344 Nigeria 78 II Exports 86.7 -26.0 1,808 2,526 -28.4% 78 I Imports 579.5 115.0 1,808 841 115.0% 78 I Balance -974 368 -1,342 Taiwan Aug 78 Exports 84.2 38.7 8,044 5,884 36.7% Aug 78 Imports 68.9 32.5 6,439 5,119 25.8% Aug 78 Balance 1,605 765 840 Thailand May 78 Exports 21.9 4.5 1,609 1,506 6.8% May 78 Imports 105.7 21.3 1,908 1,624 17.5% May 78 Balance -299 -117 -182 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 A d?A-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 AGRICULTURAL PRICES MONTHLY AVERAGE CASH PRICE WHEAT S PER BUSHEL 7.5 1-25 OCT 11 RICE 175 S PER HUNDRED WEIGHT '22.5 No. 2 Medium Grain, 4% Brokens, f.o.b. mills, Houston, Texas 16 OCT 15.50 10 OCT 15.50 SEP 78 15.50 OCT 77 17.06 t5.0 15.50 7.5 1-16 OCT 1-974 1975 1976 1977 1978 25 OCT 0.6719 18 OCT 0.6567 SEP 78 0.6101 OCT 77 0.5003 1-25 OCT II 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 SUGAR $ PER METRIC TON 75 0 PER POUND 800 1-25 OCT (I CORN 5 $ PER BUSHEL 0 1974 8.97 1-25 COFFEE/TEA 400 C PER POUND COFFEE 2,000 Other Milds Arabicas, ex-dock New York 350 25 OCT 150.00 18 OCT 154.33 300 SEP 78 155.32 1,500 OCT 77 170.90 1,000 200 TEA London Auction JUL 96.2 JUN 98.3 MAY 94.9 OCT 77 101.9 Approved For Release 2004/0742 A: Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 SOYBEANS $ PER BUSHEL Crude, Bulk, c.i.f. US Ports 25 OCT 0.3050 18 OCT 0.3050 SEP 78 0.2975 OCT 77 0.2017 500 400 25 OCT 6.91 25 OCT 177.50 18 OCT 6.70 18 OCT 175.20 SEP 78 6.47 SEP 78 164.03 OCT 77 5.05 OCT 77 136.41 SOYBEAN OIL/PALM OIL $ PER POUND $ PER METRIC TON 0.51 SOYBEAN OIL Crude, Tank Cars, f.o.b. Decatur 0 PER POUND 120 AUSTRALIA Boneless Beef, 110 f.o.b., New York 11 1-25 OCT (l 1976 1977 1978 UNITED STATES Wholesale Steer Beef, Midwest Markets } 19 OCT 108.00 21 OCT 81.83 13 OCT 106.00 14 OCT 84.28 $ PER METRIC TON $ F 1-19 OCT $ PER METRIC TON 108.38 . 2,500 1-19 OCT 500, 1-17 OCT [ NOTE: The food index is compiled by the Economist for 16 food commodities which enter international trade. Commodities are weighted by 3-year moving averages of imports into industrialized countries. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : C-PA-RDP80TOO702AO00900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS PRICES MONTHLY AVERAGE CASH PRICE COPPER WIRE BAR 140 C PER POUND LME US 25 OCT 69.3 71.6 18 OCT 67.6 71.6 SEP 78 65.4 67.8 OCT 77 54.8 60.6 LEAD S PER METRIC TON 45 C PER POUND 3,000 ZINC 100 C PER POUND LME US 25 OCT 33.3 35.0 18 OCT 31.2 35.0 SEP 78 28.8 33.0 OCT 77 23.1 32.3 1-25 OCT 1I 1,000 TIN S PER METRIC TON 750 C PER POUND 2,000 650 1-25 OCT II ' 6,000 1977 1978 1-25 OCT II 1975 1976 1 977 200 ~1978 LME US 25 OCT 731.5 776.9 18 OCT 699.5 755.7 SEP 78 630.4 674.9 OCT 77 549.6 607.9 1-25 OCT II 0 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 250 1974 O 1-19 OCT II 0 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 PLATINUM 350 $ PER TROY OUNCE LME US 25 OCT 39.2 39.0 18 OCT 36.1 39.0 37.4 SEP 78 31.4 :14.4 MP USD 25 OCT 280.0 345.5 18 OCT 255.0 326.0 SEP 78 250.2 258.0 OCT 77 167.0 156.0 PER METRIC TON 1,000 $ PER METRIC TON 16,000 734.7 ) 1-25 OCT 1977 1978 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 A-22 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 ALUMINUM Major US Producer t per pound 55.25 53.00 53.00 48.00 US STEEL Composite $ per long ton 419.31 395.81 359.36 327.00 IRON ORE Non-Bessemer Old Range $ per long ton 22.55 21.43 21.43 20.51 CHROME ORE Russian, Metallurgical Grade $ p.er metric ton NA NA 150.00 150.00 CHROME ORE S. Africa, Chemical Grade $ per long ton 56.00 56.00 58.50 42.00 FERROCHROME US Producer, 66-70 Percent t per pound 42.00 41.00 41.00 44.00 NICKEL Composite US Producer $ per pound 2.02 2.06 2.11 2.41 MANGANESE ORE 48 Percent Mn $ per long ton 67.20 67.20 72.28 72.00 TUNGSTEN ORE Contained Metal $ per metric ton 18,222.00 18,372.00 20,236.00 16,340.00 MERCURY New York $ per 76 pound flask 151.00 151.00 141.14 132.45 SILVER LME Cash t per troy ounce 594.79 515.88 476.67 421.55 GOLD London Afternoon Fixing Price $ per troy ounce 226.75 175.28 158.86 116.12 LUMBER INC)EX6 1-17 OCT 1977 1978 1970=100 1-20 OCT `II 1976 1977 1978 lApproximates world market price frequently used by major world producers and traders, although only small quantities of these metals are actually traded on the LME. 2Producers' price, covers most primary metals sold in the US. 3As of 1 Dec 75, US tin price quoted is "Tin NY lb composite." 4Quoted on New York market. 5S-type styrene, US export price. 6 This index is compiled by using the average of 13 types of lumber whose prices are regarded as bellwethers of US lumber construction costs. 7Composite price for Chicago, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh. NOTE: The industrial materials index is compiled by the Economist for 19 raw materials which enter international trade. Commodities are weighted by 3-year moving averages of imports into industrialized countries. Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : Cql,13RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/28 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000900050002-5