QUANTUM PHYSICS AND PARAPSYCHOLOGY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 25
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 11, 1998
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: October 28, 1974
• Content Type: REPORT

.Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
QUANTM4 PHYSICS AND PARAPSYCHOLOGY
The 23rd Annual International Conference of the Parapsycholo r Foundation, Inc.
Hotel La Reserve, Geneva, Switzerland August 26-27, 1974
An interpretative conference report containing sore comments about
prospects in parapsychological research.
SG11
Mved For.Rel se 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
I. INTRODUCTION
The 23rd Annual Conference of the Parapsychology Foundation was
held at the Hotel La Reserve, Geneva, Switzerland on August 26 and 27,
1974. The subject of the conference was "Quantum Physics and Parapsychology",
a topic selected at the instigation of Arthur Koestler, the well-knoti,rn
author,. who in recent years has interested himself in the subject of
parapsychology. His recent book, The Root, or Coincidence, reflects
this interest. The putative relation between quantum physics and para-
psychology arises because the apparent non-common sense features accepted
in quantum physics may be analogous to the non-common sense features
observed in parapsychological phenomena. In any case the conference
was ostensibly devoted to an exploration of the physical bases for
parapsychology.
Complete texts of all ten of the papers presented at this conference
have previously been supplied. A summary and critique of the contents
of each of the ten papers appears in the Appendix of this report. At
the conference a discussion period followed the presentation of each paper,
and at the conclusion of the conference another more general discussion
took place. The proceedings of this conference, containing both the
submitted papers and the verbal discussion, is scheduled for publication
in June 1975 by the Parapsychology Foundation, Inc., 29 West 57th Street,
New York. A brief official account of the conference will appear sooner
in their "Newsletter of the Parapsychology
Foundation".
The following discussion of conference content is based upon attendance
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
at all the sessions, subsequent study of written versions of the papers,
and private conversations with nearly all of the personalities present.
II. ANALYSIS OF TIE PURPORT OF T}TE COflF PE vCE The reality of ESP was an accented fact at this conference. When
discussion of the reality of the phenomena occurred, it was concerned only
with methods of securing public acceptance and belief in paranormal
cognition. Some doubt was expressed of the usefulness of public
demonstrations to "blue-ribbon panels", but all agreed on the necessity
of more research support.
It became clear that there exists at present no adequate theory of
paranormal perception which can furnish a physical basis for the phenomena.
The existing attempts at physical theories are speculative, incomplete,
at at best poorly substantiated; although some ideas were presented
which might furnish the seeds of fruitful investigation. These ideas
are discussed in more detail below.
The conference evidenced a rough division of attitudes toward
. parapsychology into two schools-of thought. Researchers share a general
acceptance of the strangeness of it all, but on the working level some
believe' progress in understanding can be achieved through extension
and use of existing scientific knowledge and methods, perhaps by some
new synthesis. The others basically favor a more philosophical and
tr~stical approach, and believe that nothing short of a complete revolution
of thought, maybe into more spiritual directions, can cope with the
challenge. The "mystics" characterize the physical approach as
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
naivo reductionism. The "reduct5.onist.,;", for lack of a better term,
retain their faith in the efficacy of traditional scientific methods.
These categories are a convenient simplification of complex attitudes
and some individuals show traces of both orientations.
In v'ew?of the conference topic it was surprising that the "mystics
were strongly represented. The presentations of Chari, Firsoff, Whiteman,
and Bastin seem to fall in the mystical category. Verbal comments of
Arthur Koestler woula place him also in this group. At the conclusion
of the conference he expressed disappointment that the ideas were not
"crazy" enough and voiced scepticism at seeking explanation of ESP in
existing physical theories. These contributions to the conference seem
to offer no avenues of physical understanding and will not be discussed
further.
The remaining papers presented at the conference are more physical
in content. Of the theoretical papers Costa de Beauregard gave the most
general and perhaps the best formulated analysis of a possible physical
basis for ESP. His presentation consisted of words, and not equations,
but the concepts discussed were readily understandable by a theoretical
physicist., No specific mechanism was proposed, but information theory
was interwoven with some established physical principles to describe a
framework withih which ESP might be understood. The ideas of Costa de
Beauregard are unifying in character, rather analogous to the unifying
character of the energy concept in conventional physics, ana like the
concept of energy could establish broad guidlines without supplying a
detailed mechanism. For =mple, the idea discussed by Feinberg, that
precognition is a memory propagated from the future, is subsumed in
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
Costa do- DeaurcgardIs thin%ing. Puthoff presented some speculations about
apparent features of his PK experiments which are also consistent with
the same overall picture. Indeed if any common. thread emerged from the
physical side of the conference, it was that somehow information theoretic
concepts must play an important role in ESP. The connection is established
through the equivalence of information theory with physical probability
and its role both in quantum theory and in macroscopic entropy,
A detailed and partially quantitative physical theory of ESP was
presented t-ry Walker. This theory may err through its use of overspecific
and poorly justified assumptions. It relies heavily on some explicit
conjectures about neural activity in the brain, and also postulates-an
essential function in consciousness and psi communication for the so--
called "hidden variables" of quantum theory.
A: simple empirical method of quantifying the results of ESP experiments
was proposed by Schmidt. This quantification, if appropriate, ,would
permit the various experimental manifestations of ESP ( precognition,
clairvoyance, PK, etc.) to be interrelated.
Experimental papers describing striking PK and remote viewing
experiments with gifted paragnosts were presented by Puthoff and Targ.
In terms of normal standards of scientific conferences the gleanings
of theoretical understanding from this conference are somewhat sparse,
particularly if a physical basis of ESP is the object. The phenomena
of ESP have undergone a great deal of experimental verification, but a
basic understanding of paranormal perception is evidently still lacking.
The material presented at this conference only indicates a bare beginning
of a rational, physical, interpretation of parapsychological phenomena.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved, For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
III. GEIIERAL CONCLUSIONS AND GUIDELIU' S
The Picture of ESP research derived from attendance at this conference
and supplemented by a study of publications in the open literature forms
the basis of the following general comments.
1. Knowledge of normal
perception and neural data processing in the brain
is still limited, even though the physical basis of normal perception
is well-founded. The wide area of ignorance or partial knowledge
surrounding even normal mental function is indicative of the possible
impediments to attaining a coherent understanding of paranormal perception.
The physical paradoxes of ESP are severe, but even were a physical
basis of ESP established, much would remain unknown. In short,
progress in this area may require not only increased understanding
of the physical basis of the phenomena, but also advances in cybernetics
and neurophysiologr as well.
2. The ideas of Costa de Beauregard forth the most auspicious point of
departure for development of a physical understanding of ESP. These
ideas axe favored because of their broad physical base, their use of
general information concepts, and because they contain a minimum of
ad hoc assumptions. Although some elementary deductions are immediately
possible, this theoretical framework is, as yet, insufficient..Ly articulated.
Additional analysis and calculation is needed to explore detailed
consequences of the basic general idea. Experimentally verifiable
I
predictions and relations should be souight, and the theory should be
I*
scrutinized for guidcliuao'to meaningful experimental efforts. Such
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved, For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
a program would represent a firm Physically-based attempt to un:lerstencl
some of the mechanism of. E,:P, but could not be expected to produce
immediate results:*
3'. For practical purposes- the investigation and experimental verification
of empirical regularities governing the occurrence, content, and
reliability of paranormal events should not be disdained. Although
theory is always valuable, it may not be absolutely essential. It is
quite possible to know enough about a phenomenon to use it effectively,
or to evaluate its use, without possessing any deep understanding of
its nature. The human race used fire for thousands of years without
understanding chemistry. Identification and quantification of physical
and psychological conditions for inhibition and enhancement of psi
effects is especially desirable. The apparent spontaneity of these
phenomena and their independence of most referents poses the most
serious obstacle to their application. It is difficult to perceive
the purpose served by research in parapsychology which does not attempt
to relate the phenomena to controling conditions. Parapsychology may
have application provided such relationships east on some level, even
the level of total empiricism.
4. Regardless of the level of understanding of paranormal perception it
is clear that information derived by this means is incomplete, subject
to error and distortion, and sometimes completely erroneous. In m ny
cases the accuracy is amazing, but complete errors are also frequent.
A percipient may be unable to reliably estimate his oiin accuracy.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
These inherent features raise the func?ai:cntal problem of hour such
erratic information can be utilized. How can the output of paranormal
perception be assessed according to its completeness and/or-reliability
so as to optimize its use and minimize the effect of errors? The
peculiar features of ESP derived information demand that these problems
be-addressed if such information is to serve a useful function.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 ?Qpproved?For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
,,. ? A Surary and Critique of Each Paper Presented at the Conference
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 1.
-rApproved For Release 2000/08/10
CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
T~J? :IJ',.TT0,t3 011 p,"kZ^'ir;rr,SIC.1L
r0',7C^LI F?
Evan IIurris l;'alker, Br,L, Aberdec , Provin,; Ground,, i zrvlana.
SUI?li4ARY:
The oral talk consisted only of an outline su-rmar-
y of ideas and results.
Study of a written version (69 pa ;es) of this talk together with previous
papers referenced therein is required to evaluate the thinking of Dr. Walker.
The written version of this talk explains a theory of psi phenomena resting
upon several foundations:
1. A theory of consciousness developed by Dr. Walker (referenced but rat
explained) in which triggering of nerve synapses is influenced by
single quantum-level processes, and in which there are computed 3
basic rates of data processing in the brain,
a.) Subconscious data rate 2.4(10) b;.ts/sec.
b.) Conscious data rate 7.5(10) bits/sec.
c.) Attention set or "will" d~:ta rate
3(10) bits sec.
2. The notion of "hidden variables" in quantum theory. These "hidden
variables" are not present in standard quantum theory, rand arc called
"hidden" because they are inaccessible to direct measurement. There
is no experimental verification of necessity for such variables, but
they have been conjectured solely for philosophical. sr logical motives.
The roll of these variables is to fig: the precise outcome of a quan-
tum event (or measuzre,-lent), an ')W,%cone which in standard quantum theory
is only determined in terms of its probability. The outcome of a. quan-
tum event must be the same for all observers regardless of location
or time lapse, so "hidden vnriabl es" potentially provide a con,munica-
tion channel i ncdcpenden of space and time.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 ? Approved for Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
3. The assertion that the attention set or "',ill" data rate in the brain
is the rate at which "hidden variable"-governed quantum processes are
influencing the mind, or at which the mind can influence quantum proc-
esses. Such a mind-mind or mind-object link provides a "hidder_ var-
iable" theory of psi phenomena, suitable for telepathy, clairvoyance,
precognition, and PK.
Since according to this theory the "will" or paranormal data rate, 3(10)
bits see, is a very small fraction of the conscious data rate, 7.5(10) bits/sec,
the rarity of paranormal cognition is explained. Assuming a perceptive cue may
occur at random from either data rate permits a calculation of the incidence
of psi ability in an individual or a population. Fair agreement results.
A detailed calculation. is presented of the effect of quantum uncertainties
in the initial position and velocity of a cubical die which bounces dot-m an
inclined plane. This evperimontal situation amplifies initial quantum uncer-
tainties into macroscopic differences in the final position of the die. The
results of PK placement experiments on rolling dice are consistent with those
calculations, lending credence to the belief that PH operates by resolving
quantum uncertainty.
CRITIQUE:
1. The somewhat dubious contention that the triggering of nerve synGpses
is a quantum process requires more substantiation. The author's ar-
guments leading to this contention, though published or reported, are
not readily accessible. A like statement applies to his calculation
and interpretation of the three fundamental data rates in the brain.
All the author 'a ideas form an interlocking system which has evolved
ovor several years. To*secur.e acceptance, or even objective consid-
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approve For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
eration, these thou?hts should be combined into a sinle, concise,
and solf-c,nt~7.nc presentation, which the present paper is not.
2. Hidden variables are controversial and by no means form a part of ac-
cepted physical theory. No col-Melling physical evidence requires t'iem,
unless psi phenomena itself constitutes such evidence. Invocation of
physical hidden variables for a theory of consciousness is a radical
assumption, justifiable only by successful results.
3. The theory has not yet predicted anything. The calculations of the
incidence of psi ability, and of the influence of quantum uncertain-
ties upon dice rolling, show consistency with experiment but do not
test the fundamental assumptions of the theory. The former calcula-
tion depends only upon a single number (the ratio 1:10 and the
latter is a physical calculation.
4. 'Regardless of its validity, Dr. talker's theory is the most explicit,
detailed, and quantitative theory of psi phenomena presented at this
conference; though perhaps not the most fundamental. Unlike some of
the other papers its contents are sufficiently explicit to it do-
tailed criticism and evaluation) and to at least offer some possibil-
ities of experimental assessrment.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
? 2_? P~ ^C~'_T T~):'- : 117 '0! ,. ('),?
Gerald Feinberg, Department of Physics, Colur:ibia University, idea York.
SU, 2 AFCL:
The suggestion is advanced. that precognition may be knowledge of a future
state of the percipient's m:Lncl rather than prior knowledge of an objective
state of the physical world. This, like memory where the east state of the
mind is recalled, precognition is perception of a future state of the mind.
Professor Feinberg notes that the theory of electromagnetic radiation, and
other physical theories, in principle permits both time retarded and time ad-
vanced solutions. The time advanced Solutions which propagate information from
future to past are customarily excluded for the reason that they have not been
observed experimentally. The possibility exists of some small admixture of
time advanced solution together with the dominant time retarded solution. In
the ease of electromagnetic theory experiments arc presently testing this
sibility to the accuracy of one part in 10''.
If one assumes that the mecha:~is . of memory, whatever it may be, likei-rise
permits a small admixture of time advanced solutions as well as the usual time
retarded ones which we call memory, we have the phenomena of occasional pre-
cognition based upon perception of a future state of the mind. Precognition
of events is possible only if the percipient learns of t?`.he event at some time
in the future.
These speculations would receive experimental substantiation if precog-
nition is influenced by the same factors or, influence i.erory.
CRITIQUE:
Basically a trivial .paper, containing one idea e,:presserl in -the title,
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
;to ether with some standard p:-CT ics w'~j-ch is only rclatod to psi phenomena by
virtue of a strained analorrr, bbe-two-en electromagnetic radiation and memory
processes.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200180002-1
~. \ `a1 ,1i S"C1YOT CY'?, n1T1'T'fm LCG7C ~'?~ .i.f""'~ '^.T; C? T rEflR,
C.T.K. Ch