SERVO SYSTEMS

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04770A001700010017-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 8, 2005
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 3, 1966
Content Type: 
CONT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04770A001700010017-6.pdf132.72 KB
Body: 
25X1 ^. SEWXroved For RelB' se 2005/05/20 R1kAb d!070 700010017-6 ^. UNCLASS I F I ED CONTRACT NO.- TASK NO. CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT 25X' TO. DATE - 3A 106 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION & SETTLEMENT INSPECTION REPORT NO. (If final, so state) BRANCH/PD/OL , 3 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE - September er w4 NAME OF CONTRACTOR - - TYPE OF COMMODITY OR SERVICE so isttiJil~ THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED FUNDS ? YES 0 NO IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC- ^ YES ? OMMENDATION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE. ON REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICATE MAGNITUDE OF AD- PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED - DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED. PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED - HAS AN INTERIM REPORT. FINAL REPORT. PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PERIOD? ^ YES 0 NO (If yes, give details on reverse side.) HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? ^ YES ? NO (If yes, indicate items, quantity, and cost on reverse side.) INCENTIVES' IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT 0 YES ~NO NOTE: IF YES, CHECK TYPE USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS. COST 0 PERFORMANCE 0 DELIVERY FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION. OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR 1. ^ OUTSTANDING 3. ^ ABOVE AVERAGE 5. ^ BELOW AVERAGE 7. ^ UNSATISFACTORY 2. ^ EXCELLENT 4. ^ AVERAGE = 6. ^ BARELY ADEQUATE IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE, INDICATE REASONS ON REVERSE SIDE. RECOMMENDED ACTION CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^ WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE ^ TERMINATE ^ OTHER (Specify) IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINK REPORT PUT COMMENTS--011WREVFi6SE IN NARRATIVE FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE, WHERE APPLICABLE. THE FOLLOWING:: ITEM RECD DOES NOT ITEM RECD DOES NOT APPLY APPLY PROTOTYPES MANUALS DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FINAL REPORT PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER SPECIAL TOOLING END ITEMS OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY DATE OF L, C O T7 CONTRACTOR A , T. JAUS Z SIGNATURE OF INSP 25X INSPECTOR'S EXTE FORM 10.65 1897,.; RE V I OUs EDITION ^ UNCLASSIFIED 0 `CONFIDENTIAL ^ SECRET Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001700010017-6 Declass Review by NGA. 25X1 25X1 U 0 CONFIDENTIAL ^ UNCLASSIFIED Approved FRxIftw i%i5/20 : CIA-RDP7 gq4jffi010017-6 ^ FINAL on Juno 8, 1966 vWtod V M to evaluate Vall point pen r kin eyotfm a le by They both retied that the eyestcn e potent l for tt us Mott( 8, 3.966#1 vi etta NPIC -ydtams to be tried on the .otter. 8c -i+I e d it x- m onth o o three ores to d .ed, that, tut ire bx a oar to4 be e WAt Mounted on a b1oe uh4 could than be plotter. The unit tl d I visions for uat> preoetn or the mmrtjm~gr system scribe nth durin; the Au r et 2 viait ?..nri 1. P er to .. point pen - Difficulty vaA encountered in sett pen r otiJE" o. When enough predl ct .io I, the line U43 #41 a' L41c. 2, Stuedtler posa, 1.0 and 0.6 aim "aei' 8t t l er free flowing ink,a Bopth pole skipped an ve type der the. 1*0 pen pr'e uccd n darks etrui,-,ht line an Carr film. e itl vaz icxt eU iy as a iunet&on of epe but not em ugh to be objmt Len ble. pews to be a god o ,t to for Cuture agmelo nt. The ink dr9e4 in lose thnza eM auto af't c hie t on. Noap lutt ri during dottLi mde . 3. Eeterbre c a liU-ary zen vM #Qterbsook re .i. d;3r ?r all. pure ink, 'Skipped on paver a an Crete. I . s not dry after r' min itee. No exaiatt in c uri drotti M01116. UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001700010017-6 25X1 25X1 ^ SECRET