SERVO SYSTEMS
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP78B04770A001700010017-6
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date:
February 8, 2005
Sequence Number:
17
Case Number:
Publication Date:
August 3, 1966
Content Type:
CONT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 132.72 KB |
Body:
25X1
^. SEWXroved For RelB' se 2005/05/20 R1kAb d!070 700010017-6 ^. UNCLASS I F I ED
CONTRACT NO.- TASK NO.
CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT
25X'
TO.
DATE -
3A 106
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION & SETTLEMENT
INSPECTION REPORT NO. (If
final, so state)
BRANCH/PD/OL
,
3
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
-
September er w4
NAME OF CONTRACTOR -
-
TYPE OF COMMODITY OR SERVICE
so isttiJil~
THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
FUNDS ? YES 0 NO IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC-
^ YES ?
OMMENDATION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE. ON
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICATE MAGNITUDE OF AD-
PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED -
DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED -
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT. FINAL REPORT. PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD? ^ YES 0 NO (If yes, give details on reverse side.)
HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? ^ YES ? NO
(If yes, indicate items, quantity, and cost on reverse side.)
INCENTIVES'
IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT 0 YES ~NO
NOTE:
IF YES, CHECK TYPE
USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS.
COST 0 PERFORMANCE 0 DELIVERY
FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR
1. ^ OUTSTANDING 3. ^ ABOVE AVERAGE 5. ^ BELOW AVERAGE 7. ^ UNSATISFACTORY
2. ^ EXCELLENT 4. ^ AVERAGE = 6. ^ BARELY ADEQUATE
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE, INDICATE REASONS ON
REVERSE SIDE.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^ WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
^ TERMINATE ^ OTHER (Specify)
IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINK REPORT PUT COMMENTS--011WREVFi6SE IN NARRATIVE
FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN
RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE, WHERE APPLICABLE. THE FOLLOWING::
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
APPLY
APPLY
PROTOTYPES
MANUALS
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FINAL REPORT
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
SPECIAL TOOLING
END ITEMS
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
DATE OF L,
C
O
T7
CONTRACTOR
A
, T.
JAUS
Z
SIGNATURE OF INSP 25X
INSPECTOR'S EXTE
FORM
10.65
1897,.; RE V I OUs
EDITION
^ UNCLASSIFIED 0 `CONFIDENTIAL
^ SECRET
Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001700010017-6
Declass Review by NGA.
25X1
25X1
U
0 CONFIDENTIAL ^ UNCLASSIFIED
Approved FRxIftw i%i5/20 : CIA-RDP7
gq4jffi010017-6 ^ FINAL
on Juno 8, 1966
vWtod V M to evaluate Vall point pen r kin
eyotfm a le by They both retied that the eyestcn
e potent l for tt us Mott(
8, 3.966#1 vi etta NPIC
-ydtams to be tried on the .otter. 8c
-i+I e d it x- m onth o o three ores to
d .ed, that, tut ire bx a oar to4 be
e WAt Mounted on a b1oe uh4 could than be
plotter. The unit tl d I visions for uat>
preoetn or the mmrtjm~gr system scribe nth
durin; the Au r et 2 viait ?..nri
1. P er to .. point pen - Difficulty vaA encountered
in sett pen r otiJE" o. When enough predl ct .io I,
the line U43 #41 a' L41c.
2, Stuedtler posa, 1.0 and 0.6 aim "aei' 8t t l er
free flowing ink,a Bopth pole skipped an ve type der
the. 1*0 pen pr'e uccd n darks etrui,-,ht line an Carr film.
e itl vaz icxt eU iy as a iunet&on of epe but
not em ugh to be objmt Len ble. pews to be a god
o ,t to for Cuture agmelo nt. The ink dr9e4 in lose thnza
eM auto af't c hie t on. Noap lutt ri during dottLi
mde .
3. Eeterbre c a liU-ary zen vM #Qterbsook re .i. d;3r ?r
all. pure ink, 'Skipped on paver a an Crete. I . s
not dry after r' min itee. No exaiatt in c uri drotti
M01116.
UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001700010017-6
25X1
25X1
^ SECRET