EQUIPMENT AND STUDIES (SERIES OF PROJECTS UNDER OUR CONTRACT)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78B04770A000600050006-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 27, 2004
• Sequence Number: 6
• Publication Date: February 2, 1966
• Content Type: FORM

?3ECRET A r ? CONFIDENTIAL Q 7 3 ? UNCLASSIFIED
ON wywu 015-15
r CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT
TO:
DATE
2 February 1966
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION &
SETTLEMENT
INSPECTION REPORT NO. (If final, so state)
BRANCH/PD/OL
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
Indefinite
NAME OF CONTRACTOR
Declass Review by NGA.
TYPE OF COMMODITY OR SERVICE
Equipment and Studies
Series. of Projects under our contract)
THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
NO
?
FUNDS YES 0 NO IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC-
,
YES
ON AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE. ON
OMMENDA
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICAT
E MAGNITUDE OF AD-
PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED
DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT. FINAL
REPORT. PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FR
OM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD? U YES 0
No (If yes, give details on reverse side.) 111111
HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD?
YES ? No
'(If yes, indicate items, quantity
, and cost on reverse side.)
INCENTIVES'
IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT 0 YES NO
NOTE:
IF YES. CHECK TYPE
USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS.
COST 0 PERFORMANCE
DELIVERY
FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTI1
E EVALUATION.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR
1. ? OUTSTANDING 3. ABOVE AVERAGE 5. BELOW AVERAGE 7.
UNSATISFACTORY
2. ? EXCELLENT 4. ? AVERAGE 6. ? BARELY ADEQUATE
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE, INDICAT
E REASONS ON
REVERSE SIDE.
Series of pr
described on reverse-
ojects
f
RECOMMENDED ACTION
? CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED
W
TERMINATE
? OTHER (Specify)
IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT PUT COMMENTS ON REVERSE IN NARRATIVE
CTOR'S PERFORMANCE
FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE
A
AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN
AND CE
RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE, WHERE APPLICABLE, THE FOLLOWING:
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
ITEM
REC'D
DOES NOT
APPLY
APPLY
PROTOTYPES
MANUALS
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FINAL REPORT
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
SPECIAL TOOLING
END ITEMS
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR
SIGNATURE OF INSPE TOR
F I
DIVISION
INSPECTOR'S EXTENSION
SIGNATURE OF APPROVER
770A0006,9g0gR0RP~6 (12-36)
10.65 1897 PREVIOUSA" pU tekA1 2004/11/3Q-~C~INFE RL u
EDITION U
 CONFIDENTIAL UNCLASSIFIED
PAR 207 "DefinitieStudy of Contact Printers.':'. Final Report due in
February. Proceeding satisfactorily.
PAR 202/224 "Briefing Print Enlarger." Breadboard and tests in final
stage. Have waived the final report in order to construct the
Prototype which has been authorized as PAR 243. This project is
considered outstanding.
PAR 211 "Microdensitometer Study of Effects of Processing." Final Report
received on 1 November 1965. Evaluation completed on 31 January.
Considered Unsatisfactory.
PAR 212 "Color Acquisition System Review Study." Final Report was
received 1 November. Evaluation completed 31 January. Considered
Barely Adequate.
PAR 213 "Color Reproduction Systems Review." Final Report was evaluated
on 28 December 1965. Considered Below Average.
PAR 216 "Laser Photographic Exposure." Evaluation of Final Report was
completed on 29 October 1965. Considered Unsatisfactory.
PAR 217 "Optimization of Lasers.", Final Report was received on 1 Nov. 1965.
Evaluation was completed on 18 January 1966. Considered Unsatisfactory.
PAR 233 "Zoom Projection Lens." Work has just begun. Visited ^ on
31 January and 1 February 1966. Proceeding satisfactorily,.
PAR 242A "Color Demonstration Materials." Proceeding satisfactorily.
PAR 243 "Briefing Print Enlarger Prototype." Commenced this project in
January 1966. Great expectations!
COMMENTS:
PAR 211, PAR 212, PAR 213, PAR 216 and PAR 217 all appear to be
challenges not met by this particular division of ^ They probably
should not have been assigned to 0 as projects since so little has
been given in return. Recommend we notify ^ of general poor quality
of research and reporting, then close out these particularlprojects
as "water under the bridge".
Note: PARs 214 and 215 were delivered and installed in NPTC in
October/November 1965. They are still undergoing experimental
operations although the PARs are completed.
UNCLASS I F IERpproved For Release OAK ib.qIW-IRDP78B04770A000600O50006-J SECRET
25
25
25
 CREI
Approved Folftlease 20 4 1/30: CIA-RDP78B047
Dear Rock
25X1- Rafwa,%ncet Contract
4(
"Color Demonstration Material'
OQ50~76~6~
0
28 September 1965
In order to complete our briefing materials for PAR-213, we will
require more material than was listed in PAR 242. Our letter of 5 May 1965
indicated that considerably more slide material would be needed than was
.included in PAR 242; we would therefore like to expand PAR 242 to include
additional materials as indicated below. This would require a new ached.
ale and fiscal estimate. It is assumed that all slides discussed in PAR
242 are made by color separation printing.
Additional Materials
1. Increase item 3f of PAR 242 to five each.
2. Adds one contact S0-121 on SO-121 by subtractive printing.
3. Adds one contact 50-121 to 4400 by white light printing
thence to 8430 by mercury light printing.
4. Adds one contact from'original 4404 to 8430 and one 50.121 on
SO-108 (additive).
5? Adds one each 1X, 2X and 4X from 5X Interneg Ektacolor ?? all
by subtractive printing.
In summary, this means that the number of slides for the revised
PAR will be increased from seven to 18 each, four of which will be by
subtractive printing, and one will be from black and white to black and
white.
GROUP I
Approved For Relea R) /30 : CIA-RDP78B04770A00b "aw"