CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT FOR IMAGE PERCEPTIBILITY STUDY
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP78B04770A000300050019-5
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date:
November 1, 2004
Sequence Number:
19
Case Number:
Publication Date:
July 5, 1966
Content Type:
FORM
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 106.22 KB |
Body:
^ SECRET
o
ONTRACT NO.
C
TASK N0,
CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT
TO:
DA
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION & SETTLEMENT
INSPECTION REPORT NO. (If final, so state)
BRANCH/PD/OL
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
22 _1V 1%j2
NAME OF CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF COMMODITY OR SERVICE
'L Force?? bilit '
THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
^ rES ?
FUNDS YES ^ NO IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC-
NO
OMMEND ION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE
O
,
N
PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED -[
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN, INDICATE MAGNITUDE OF AD.
DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED .
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT , FINAL REPORT, PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD? W YES ^ NO (If yes, give details on reverse side .)
HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? ^ YES ? NO
(If yes, indicate items, quantity, and cost on reverse side.)
INCENTIVES-
IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT 0 YES NO
NOTE:
IF YES. CHECK TYPE
USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS.
COST O PERFORMANCE ^ DELIVERY
FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR
1. ^ OUTSTANDING 3. ^ ABOVE AVERAGE 5. 1:1 BELOW AVERAGE 7. 1:1 UNSATISFACTORY
2. 1-1 EXCELLENT 4. ^ AVERAGE 6. El BARELY ADEQUATE
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE. INDICATE REASONS ON
REVERSE SIDE.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
? CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^ WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
^ TERMINATE ^ OTHER (Specify)
IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT PUT COMMENTS ON REVERSE IN NARRATIVE
FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN
RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE, WHERE APPLICABLE, THE FOLLOWING:
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
ITEM
DOES NOT
APPLY
REC D
APPLY
PROTOTYPES
MANUALS
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FINAL REPORT
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
SPECIAL TOOLING
END ITEMS
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR
3.5 J'. 1966
SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR DIVISION
INSPECTOR'S E
1065 1897 PREVIOUS El UNCLASSIFIED
Ad
M&TS 030005^01 Y LASS I F I ED
f] CONFIDENTIAL
^ SECRET
AppromEgg ft V ff W1~1/30 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA000300050019-5
25X1
25X1
^ SECRET
? CONFIDEN
Approved For Release 2004/11/30 : C
NARRATIVE REPORT
El [INC LASS I
On er .Last visit to the contsractor# the contract adulAistratur
ac iett eye. We reviewed 'meat work h&1 b m; A and checked
their t tbr7. I also gave a brief ex , .armat ion or why we ref "*4
to u; rove the expesadi tore of additional &=a to trq new
CRT's. min, unexj gated can uj3 durir. t'* visit.
I rex' tail to aLIAN wa overrun in the >urchase of
(2T's, we have eseenti*14 blacked az more experi tin& with the
ei.ectrva is breadboard printer. The vice was vhet per to 4 .prove the
s o l' the tat* aM a t:xt~we overrun of at least II in uox s
os" drr-ir taq * re iuc ru tioa tr4m an e;-*a loo , emulated limit ,riuter
of about 50 liaae/l leaoiutift or to gut % be project off'. The latter
oo wse was chosen Niue to the r: cap ;at the contractor a 4 the
native results so ar,
ae t at W X at the *=tractors facility which
will hay, to be rommod at the *&I of the ccnt ract. the contractor
desire to parcheae *am of the equlieesnt, and we told
bid c r bids an the equipment he wanted. We have not
bits yet. Good use can be m 4e of poet of the equt mwmt;
however, the electronic circuitry and the special CRT tubas und
iat+sd dear have little value i'tnr OPZC at ;vooant.
^ UNCLASSIFIED
CONFIDENTIAL
^ SECRET
F IED
-'1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Approved For Release 2004/11/30 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA000300050019-5