PROJECT 8728 SESSION: 4 VIEWER: 018

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00789R003700850007-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: May 8, 2000
• Sequence Number: 7
• Publication Date: January 19, 1988
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700850007-2
N - HANDLE VIA SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
WARNING NOTICE: INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
------------------------------
PROJ ECT NTUMBER . 872 o ----- ------
SESSION NUMBER: 4
DATE OF SESSION: 19 JAN 88 DATE OF
START: 1017
REPORT: 19 JAN 88
END: 1039
METHODOLOGY: CRV VIEWER IDENTIFIER: 018
---------------------------------------------
1. (S/NF/SK) MISSION:
2. (S/NF/SK) VIEWER TASKING:
3. (S/NF/SK) COMMENTS: 018 too tired to work: session aborted.
SG1J
/ c% d"y?
SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP($4j$ R W37W1a50007-Z-DT
DECLASSIFY OADR
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 CIA-RDP96-00789R003700850007-2
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DATE: 17 January, 1988
REPLY TO
SUBJECT: SESSION SUMMARY (C /SS )
SG1J TO: DT-S (ATTN:
um.
1. (S-SS) Statistics: Viewer:
018
Session date: 17 JAN 88
Mode of operation: CRV
ES-fi b} Task g:
- Describe the site at coordinates 174301/868883,
3. (S-SS) Results:
a. The first impression was of an arched, pie-shaped
object (NFI). (See sketch, page 1)
-- ved to 1/2 mile above the tar t t
h
6V
ere was a
erce n ge s
f,; urge complex of bui 1d ?
i
g column) broke out to interest, curiosity,
inquisitiveness, indecision, and a longing for swe!ts.
e. Tasked with describing the outside surroundings of the
person, I perceived-, istant _
with having the man poi out alandmmarrkk,the manupointedatoea
set of ire buildings off in the distance, which were located
separate from the city, proper (see drawing, bottoip of page 7).,
f. With the next cue, some seemingly unrelated impressions
were perceived,",
.nitor called a break. Tke monitor then
commented that my sleepy state seemed to be affecting the
session, and changed the "break" to a "session end", both to
allow a postponement until I could work under better conditions,
and to allow him to catch up on some back paperwork,
ngs, w~ th a semi-circular
o~t area In front of it (see drawing,
mile above the target, the same generralpiimpressionsvwereo a full
r,
received, with the one added impression of the land being uneven,
as though it were rolling hills between two large hills.
C. I was suddenly impressed with the vague visual of
someone hiding behind a curtain, peeking through it. The prior
emanations of this broke out to curiosity and fear for the
person, and the colors orange and white for the curtain.
f person The cue was given that I was to perceive a certain
( person (NFI). After a series of AOLs, I began to get impressions
of being indoors in old-timey surroundings, and a person whose
personal feelin s (EI
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700850007-2
memorana
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
(REV. 1-80)
GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6
5010-114
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700850007-2
4. (S/SS) Viewer's critique: sleepy condition. The monitor was as session was plagued by my ely
l
s for the session, and I made the mistake of msitting5andnwaitingte
for him to arrive, rather than returning to the office and
busying myself with other work. Historically,
cool-down time" has proven to be a bad preparations technique a for
me, usually resulting in a severely hard-to-control state of
sleepiness. Records of past (training) sessions, have shown that
taking the standard "cool-down period" usually ends in poor
results from a session, and for that reason, I would have serious
doubts about any of the material contained in this session's
transcript.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700850007-2