REMOTE ANNEALING OF HIGH CARBON STEEL PARTS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 13
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 21, 1998
• Sequence Number: 9
• Publication Date: November 1, 1982
• Content Type: RS

Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
eizezae T ateziae Qeizetied Ond titate
REMOTE ANNEALING
OF
HIGH CARBON STEEL PARTS
Severin Dahlen, President
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
The investigation of a phenomenon known as "warm-forming" was initiated
in January of 1981 and continues to the present. The mechanism used to explore
this phenomenon is a series of psychokinesis or PK parties. A PK party con-
sists of approximately 25 persons of varied backgrounds gathered for the purpose
of bending metal objects.(stainless steel silverware, rods, bar stock, etc.)
which are not otherwise easily deformed. The party lasts between one and two
hours during which time each of the attendees is instructed to command a metal
object to bend while being lightly held between the thumb and index finger.
The effect which most people experience at these parties is that the metal
becomes warm and soft for a short period of time. During this short interval
the metal object is easily deformed using little manual force. A more detailed
description of the PK party, its format and the materials required is pro-
vided in Reference 1.
It has been speculated in Reference 2 that the momentary warming and
softening of the metal is caused by the participant's ability to transmit
information into the metal. Somehow energy from within the metal may cause
intense local heating along the grain boundaries and subsequent slippage when
minimal or moderate force is applied. Repeated successes(between 85 and 90%
of participants experience the "warm-forming" phenomenon) in over 30 PK
parties together with the explanation postulated and described in detail in
Reference 2 has given rise to the question: Is it possible for a state-change
or an annealing-like process to occur in hardened metals simply by exposing them
to the environment of a PK party?
The experiment documented in this report was conceived to explore the
possibility that hardened metals, repeatedly exposed to the PK party environ-
ment, could undergo a change in physical properties. The participants at the
PK parties were not aware of the experiment. The experiment was conducted from
September 15, 1982 to November 19, 1982 and consisted of a series of surface
hardness measurements of high carbon steel samples before and after exposure to
the PK party environment. These measurements were then compared with similar
1
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
results taken periodically from a control sample that was purposely isolated
from these party activities. The experiment clearly demonstrated a significant
reduction in the exposed group's tensile strength properties. This reduction
in tensile strength, verified from repeated surface hardness measurements, is
believed to be the result of PK Party exposure and the process is called
"Remote Annealing Radiation" or RAR.
Four high carbon steel hacksaw blades were purchased from a local hardware
store and removed from their protective covers. The blades were marked and
divided into two evaluation groups. One blade was chosen as the control sample
and was isolated (two mile separation) from the subsequent series of PK parties.
The other three blades were chosen for repeated (four) exposures at these
parties and were periodically tested using professional testing equipment and
procedures. A simple test set-up was used to ensure repeatability of the pre-
cision hardness measurements and similarly the samples were maintained at room
temperature during exposure, storage, test, and transportation. The control
sample was tested periodically during the course of the experiment. All three
blades in the second group were tested on both sides of their flat surfaces to
obtain an average hardness number after each RAR exposure. Figure 1 shows the
location of the test points designated 1 through 6. All these test points are
located in the middle (between the top of the blade and the cutting teeth) of
the blade to avoid variations in hardness which normally occur near the edges
of a hacksaw blade.
OPPOSITE SIDE HARDNESS CHECK POINTS
Figure 1. Hardness Test Point Areas
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
Table 1 lists the dates of all the events in this experiment. Note that
the exposed group was tested twice following the third exposure.
Before hardness testing began, both surfaces of each blade were inspected
for possible discoloration or other surface imperfections which might alter or
influence the subsequent surface hardness measurements. This was accomplished
using a stereo microscope set at a magnification of twenty (20X). All four
blades appeared to have uniform surface conditions.
A Rockwell Superficial Scale 15N (15 kg. load, diamond cone indenter)
was used for the hardness measurements. Before each test, the apparatus was
checked with a certified 15N-scale hardness test block to ensure precision
performance. Also the same 2-inch diameter anvil was used to support each
test specimen. Frequent calibration of the test equipment was made to ensure
precision hardness measurements.
Each test of a sample consisted of six measurements, three per side at the
three locations indicated in Figure 1. At the end of each test, the data were
marked to indicate the testing rate, operating mode, location number, date,
time, and final cumulative mean indicated on the 15N dial.
All test results are summarized in Table 2. The measurements taken at
the beginning of the experiment indicated that the blades had nearly the same
initial hardness. Periodic testing of the control sample over a two month
interval revealed that the variability in the hardness measurement never
exceeded + 2 units on the Rockwell scale. Examination of the test measure-
ments associated with the exposed group indicates a persisted reduction in
hardness level accompanied by a fluctuation in test to test readings similar
to that recorded for the control sample.
3
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
Table 1
EVENT SUMMARY
Event
Sep 13,
1982
Purchased hacksaw blades
Sep 15,
1982
Test hardness of all blades
Sep 16,
1982
1st exposure, 2nd group PK party noa 30
Oct
5,
1982
Test hardness of 2nd group
Oct
6,
1982
2nd expsoure, 2nd group PK party no. 31
Oct 11, 1982
Test hardness of control blade
Oct 28, 1982
Test hardness of 2nd group
Nov
1,
1982
3rd exposure, 2nd group PK party noa 34
Nov
2,
1982
Test hardness of 2nd group
Nov
9,
1982
Test hardness of control blade
Nov 10,
1982
Test hardness of 2nd group
Nov 10,
1982
4th exposure, 2nd group PK party no. 35
Nov 18,
1982
Test hardness of control blade
Nov 19,
1982
Test hardness of 2nd group
Group No. 1 - Nonexposed (one blade) group
Group No, 2 - Exposed (three blades) group
4
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
Table 2A: Control Sample "C" (Nonexposed)
HARDNESS DATA USING ROCKWELL SUPERFICIAL 15N SCALE
Test Date
Control
Sample
Average of
6 Readings
Conversion to
Tensile Strength in psi(3)
9-15-82
82
75
77
167,000
82
79.5
79
79
79
79
5
167
000
.
,
79
79.5
79
11-09-82
79
79
80
-79.1
---~=
167,000
79.5
78
79
11-18-82
82
78
79
167,000
78
79
78.5
Hardness numbers are displayed according to the following
pattern corresponding to the test points shown in Figure 1:
1
2 3
4
5 6
(3) Reference
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
Table 2B: Test Sample No. 1 (0) Exposed
HARDNESS DATA USING ROCKWELL SUPERFICIAL 15N SCALE
Test Sample Average Value Conversion to
Test Date No.1 of 6 Readings Tensile Strength in psi (3)
9-15-82 75 78 75
Before 76 77 75
Exposure
10-05-82 74 76 75
72 73 74
10-28-82 73.5 75 71
73.5 73 72
11-02-82 72 73.5 72
70 73 69
11-10-82 73 73 72
68 69 72
11-19-82 72 72 71
67 69 65
76.0 =--- . 142,000
130,000
73.0 ----a- 124,000
71.5 --- - 119,000
115,500
69.3 ---~ 106,000
Hardness numbers are displayed according to the following
pattern corresponding to the test points shown in Figure 1:
1 2 3
4 5 6
(3) Reference
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
Table 2C: Test Sample No. 2(A) Exposed
HARDNESS DATA USING ROCKWELL SUPERFICIAL 15N SCALE
Test Sample
Average Value Conversion to
Test Date
No. 2
of 6 Readings Tensile Strength in psi(3)
9-15-82
76
75
77
Before
76.0
---
142,000
Exposure
75
76
77
10-05-82
74
75
73
74.0
--~..
130,000
73
74
75
10-28-82
70
74
73
71
73
72
11-02-82
71
75
70
72
70
70
11-10-82
71
73
71
70.1
111,000
66
71
69
11-19-82
72
71
72
69.6
107,000
64
70
69
Hardness numbers-are displayed according to the following
pattern corresponding to the test points shown in Figure 1:
1 2 3
4 5 6
(3) Reference
7
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
Table 2D: Test Sample No. 3 (0) Exposed
HARDNESS DATA USING ROCKWELL SUPERFICIAL 15N SCALE
Test Sample
Average Value Conversion to
Test Date
No. 3
of 6 Readings Tensile Strength in psi (3)
9-15-82
79.5
79
80
Before
166,000
Exposure
79
78
78
10-05-82
78.5
78
76
76.2
-~
148,000
76
77
72
10-28-82
77
75
77
73.6
--~
127,000
70
71
72
11-02-82
71.5
76
72
71.6
118,000
68
71.5
71
11-10-82
77
72
75
71.1
----~
115,000
67.5
67.5
68
11-19-82
73
72
71
70.5
112,000
67
70
70
Hardness numbers are displayed according to the following
pattern corresponding to the test points shown in Figure 1:
1
2 3
4
5 6
(3) Reference
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
In Figure 2 the test data are averaged to eliminate the test-to-test
variations and the Rockwell scale readings converted to tensile strength
expressed in pounds per square inch (Reference 3). The average of measurements
taken on the control sample and each of the test samples is displayed over the
duration of the experiment. The event summary presented in Table 1 is superposed
on Figure 2 to provide a reference for the measurements.
Subsequent to the first RAR exposure, large strength reduction of 18,000
psi occurred in Sample 3. The average reduction in tensile strength following
each RAR varied between 10,000 and 18,000 psi. Over the duration of the
experiment (four RAR exposures) the tensile strength of Sample 3 was recuced
by 50,000 psi while the other two samples experienced a 35,000 psi reduction.
Annealing definitely occurred in the three hacksaw blades that were
exposed to RAR during four PK parties. The hardness of the high carbon steel
blades was reduced, as demonstrated by a reduction in tensile strength,
between 35,000 and 50,000 psi for each of the exposed blades. The control
blade did not vary from its original hardness level during the same time period
of this experiment. The final hardness level of the exposed blades was nearly
down to the top of the hardness range for annealed steel. This range is also
shown on Figure 2.
If the results of this experiment were to be duplicated using conventional
methods, the hacksaw blades would have to be placed in an annealing furnace for
approximately one hour at a temperature between 1450 and 1525 deg. F. Then
they would be slowly cooled down to 1200 deg. F (50 deg./hr.). After reaching
1200 deg. F, then the blades could be cooled in air down to room temperature.
This annealing procedure typically requires eight to ten hours (Reference 4).
Much experimentation remains because there are many unknown factors in
how RAR works. Many complex human parameters, such as mental attitudes,
9
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
0103S - NSL IelallaadnS IIaMM3o}j
rAn
0
00 co N r-. rNN N
0
z
0
250
W W
--004/-LU
I 1 I
O Of
1S31 r'-
3anSOdX3
-H1anOd (NV iS31
31dWVS-31S31 ?D -
1531 N
3anSOdX3 dalHi
I ' 3anSOdX3 1Sa13
3anSOdX338O339 1S31
co O
rl~
(ISd) HDNI 'DS aid S131 OOOL X H1DN3a.S 311SN31
U,-
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : d?A-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
desires, personalities, and level of emotional intensity, are involved in this
type of experimentation. However, it is becoming clear that the human mind
can have a dramatic effect on material things as demonstrated in this experi-
ment. This experiment is easily replicated by anyone with access to hardness
testing equipment and PK parties. Any data obtained from similar experimenta-
tion would be greatly appreciated.
11
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
 Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8
1. Jack Houck, "PK Party Format and Materials Required,"
Private Publication, March 16, 1982
2. Jack Houck, "Conceptual Model of Paranormal Phenomena,"
Private Publication, September 21, 1982
3. J.H. Westbrook and H. Conrad (Eds.), "The Science of Hardness Testing
and Its Research Applications," American Society for Metals, 1973
4. ASM Metals Handbook--9th Ed., 1981, Volume 4, Table 2, page 17
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020009-8