REPLY TO(Sanitized) QUESTIONS OF 6 JUNE 1966 CONCERNING PROJECT 99715-3

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04747A002600010023-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 30, 2001
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 10, 1966
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04747A002600010023-8.pdf91.77 KB
Body: 
~' Approved Fel~~ DP785047.4WA00260001~0 NPIC/P&DS/D/ 10 June 1966 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Reply to uestions of 6 June 1966 Concerning Project 1. Film Transport: Design Requirement Preliminary Test Final Test Low Range 0.02 to 0.20"/sec. ? to 0.21"/sec. ? to 0.196"/sec High Range 2.4 to 24"/sec. ? to 25.8"/sec. ? to 19.7"/sec. Although the preliminary test maximum figures exceeded the requirements, the minimum speed in each range did not (although not documented). After adjustment, control of the film at minimum deflection was much enhanced (although, again, not documented). Max- imum speeds were reduced as shown. Although not entirely meeting specs, this function of the instrument has been considered acceptable for a prototype development by past and present monitors. Admittedly, the minimum speed in each range should have been determined. The optimistic note in the Acceptance Inspection Report (Memo- randum For The Record, 4 May 1966), that the new power supply to be installed would greatly improve the cloud and shadow/reject modes, has not been born out following the subject installation. Further examination of these functions is in order; however, they cannot be considered successful items among the various goals of this develop- ment. Since no precise specifications fo:r these capabilities are spelled out factors for report. in the contract documents, I did not consider them levying penalties against vith a negative acceptance 4. The Final Contract Inspection Report (# 24) might have been pre-mature, in view of your questions plus the fact that I intend to Declass Review ` yp' Mrat u ll bsts. However, prior to initiation 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A eBOUP 1 Approved For ReIe DP78BO4747AO0260001002 ctaaetl from automatic WIDENTI downgrading and daciasslticatian Approved Fp Release 2002/01/02: CIA-RDP78B0474;-A002600010023-8 CONFIDENTIAL of the POP procedure it was our intention to close out this project (997153) and request a Special =nvestigation assignment with 25X1A new 1966 number. decided against such cancellation and re-initiation las wee . 25X1A 5. To date, higher priority work has delayed further T&E on this instrument. In addition, the recent malfunction of the Panoramic Stereoviewer has further delayed such work. It is my intention to attempt (with the aid of EPS) a tempora:cy "fix" on the latter instru- ment to permit continuing acceptance testing while arranging with for a finished job. I am attemptin;z to complete acceptance test of the Panoramic Stereoviewer before leaving for the University of Rochester Optics course and a (hoped fo:r) 2-weeks vacation following. In view of the foregoing - I am open to your recommendations concerning 99715-3 or other items. 25X1A Distribution: Orig - Project File 99715-3 1 - DB Chrono pnf Approved For ReleasCUp~~0~DEN1j~~I P78B04747A002600010023-8 Approved For Release 2002/01/02: CIA-RDP78B047A002600010023-8 NOP, CONFIDENTIAL 1. Has the film drive system been corrected to operate according to specs.? 2. Has the cloud reject? Approved For Rel T44DP78B04747A002600010023-8