PROPOSED GRILL FLAME PROTOCOL, PROPOSED SRI INTERNATIONAL APPLIED REMOTE VIEWING PROTOCOL (S)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00788R001300070001-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 57
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 5, 2000
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: March 23, 1979
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2000 GMP96-00788ROO1300070001-1
SEVORET
CLI VAWH'I[ i' 9G In I
PROPOSED GRILL FLAME PROTOCOL (U)
PROPOSED SRI INTERNATIONAL APPLIED
REMOTE VIEWING PROTOCOL (S)'
WARNING NOTICE - Intelligence Sources
and Methods Involved
NOS" RELEASA E ITO FOREIGN
NATIONAW
~., W, (N)
SRI 9-4107
Copy No. 3
SECRET
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 ved For Release 2000/O W7 : DP96-007888001300070001-1
MEMO Ckff
PROPOSED GRILL FLAME PROTOCOL (U)
PROPOSED SRI INTERNATIONAL APPLIED
REMOTE VIEWING PROTOCOL (S)
CLASSIFIED BY: Msg. HQDA(DAMI-ISH) Wash.
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION
Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to
Administrative and Criminal Sanctions
WARNING NOTICE - Intelligence Sources
and Methods Involved
NOT RELEASABLE TO FORE_I,
NAT.IORALEU
This document consists
of3 pages.
Copy No. 3 of 15 copies.
333 Ravenswood Ave. ? Menlo Park, California 94025
[phone] ? Cable: STANRES, Menlo Park ? TWX: 910-373-1246
ved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2000/0 / 7 ? fit;?DP96-00788RO01 300070001-1
(S) PROPOSED GRILL FLAME PROTOCOL (U)
(S) PROPOSED SRI INTERNATIONAL
APPLIED REMOTE VIEWING PROTOCOL (S)
1. (S) GENERAL
This protocol contains the procedure for AMSAA-sponsored SRI Inter-
national-performed remote viewing. It is in effect for the period required
to accomplish the scope of work. Remote viewing (RV) is an intellectual
process by which a person perceives characteristics of a location remote
from that person. RV does not involve any electronic sensing devices at
or focused at the target site, nor does it involve classical photo inter-
pretation of photographs obtained from overhead or oblique means. The
individual performing RV (the remote viewer) is provided with a unique
identifier such as stationary map coordinates, a specific structure, an
identifiable vehicle (aircraft tail number) or a specific individual
(name, place of birth, age, and/or photograph). The task of the remote
viewer is to locate, identify and/or describe the target. The task is
achievable.1-5 (Reference 1 is included here as Tab A.) No drugs,
hypnosis, special sensory (visual, auditory or olfactory) or proprio-
ceptive stimuli, liminal or subliminal, electrical or electromagnetic
stimuli will be used in this RV protocol.
2. (S) MILITARY OBJECTIVE
It is the objective of this protocol to familiarize Army and contractor
personnel with RV procedures as they apply to the location and identifica-
tion of militarily significant targets.
3. (S) MILITARY APPLICATIONS
RV provides a potential capability to target field-mobile weapons which
are currently difficult or impossible to detect prior to launch, such as
tactical missiles and rockets and attack helicopters. RV can be used
to: target on key enemy military individuals, from covert agents to key
battle commanders; detect the change in state of military units; to
rapidly determine the damage resulting from nonnuclear weapon attack; to
determine the access code to computers and other electronic devices; and
to determine the general content of documents and other informational
items found in military organizations.
wr !\rT
#10 on
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000/ fDP96OO788ROOl 300070001-1
*J L.
4. (S) APPROVAL HISTORY
SRI International was requested by the U.S. Army Materiel Systems
Analysis Activity (AMSAA) to prepare a proposal for an extension of their
(SRI) previous RV work which would focus on familiarizing some Army
personnel with RV procedures and application of existing RV procedures
to tactical military targets.
The Commander, U.S. Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command
(DARCOM) approved in principle the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis
Activity (AMSAA) involvement in what is now known as project GRILL FLAME
in April 1978. In May 1978, the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence
(ACSI) accepted lead responsibilty for GRILL FLAME applications. Overall
DoD responsibility resides with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).
5. (S) PROJECT OFFICERS
The overall, responsible individuals for all aspects of the project
are Harold E. Puthoff, Ph.D. and Russell Targ (for curriculum vitae see
Tabs B and C).
6. (S) DEFINITIONS
a. Remote Viewing (RV): An intellectual process by which a person
perceives characteristics of a location remote from that person; it does
not involve any electronic sensing devices at or focused at the target
nor does it involve classical photo interpretation of photographs obtained
from overhead or oblique means.
b. Remote Viewer: The person who locates, identifies and/or des-
cribes the target.
c. Interviewer: The person who interacts with the remote viewer
before, during and after the RV session.
d. Remote Viewing Session: A single attempt by the remote viewer
to locate, identify and/or describe a target.
7. (S) PROCEDURE
To provide a framework for familiarizing Army and contractor per-
sonnel with the task of RV, a series of RV sessions will be conducted.
&1W ro .0"
ftf so 1641410116
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000/0 / 7
0. Af ? DP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
The elements of an RV procedure are: (1) target selection; (2) remote
viewer session preliminaries; (3) remote viewing session; and (4) post-
session analysis. The procedure will now be described, using geographic
coordinates as the remote target identifier.
(1) TARGET SELECTION
From a target pool of 50 to 100 geographical coordinates
previously selected by an individual, called the target pool selector
(TPS), the TPS will select a target for the session. This person does
not communicate at any time with the remote viewer or the interviewer.
The 50 to 100 individual targets are randomized, numbered and stored in
a secure container accessible only to the TPS. Targets once used, are
not returned to the target pool.
(2) REMOTE VIEWER SESSION PRELIMINARIES
Before a first RV session is scheduled, the remote viewer
is oriented by the interviewer to the procedure to be followed. The
remote viewer needs to understand that he or she should give initial raw
perceptions; experience has shown' that later more deliberate interpre-
tations are quite often wrong while the initial raw perception tends to be
correct. Remote viewers are always encouraged to express their feelings
and ideas for enhancing all aspects of the RV process.
(3) REMOTE VIEWING SESSION
During the 30 to 60 minutes prior to the agreed-upon start
time of a session, the interviewer offers some encouragement to the
remote viewer in the manner of a coach giving a pep talk to his team, and
answers any questions the remote viewer may have about the procedures.
During the 15 minutes immediately before the session, the
remote viewer and interviewer are generally silent. Experience has shown
(unpublished data) that this "quiet time" enhances the RV process.
During the 15 minute viewing period the remote viewer and
the interviewer function as a team. At no time is the session conducted
by the remote viewer in the absence of all other persons. The inter-
viewer provides encouragement with words of reassurance that the task is
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000 DP96-00788R001300070001-1
in fact possible. Thus, if the remote viewer does not have any immediate
sensory images, the interviewer applies no pressure; rather, the interviewer
reassures the remote viewer that they have all the time in the world.
When the remote viewer has an image of the target site, the interviewer,
in conversation with the remote viewer, may then suggest that the remote
viewer intellectually move around at the site and describe the site more
fully (e.g., buildings, terrain features, people, activities, machinery,
etc.).
If it appears to the interviewer that the images are in
some way contradictory or inconsistent, the interviewer may then attempt
clarification by asking questions in order to verify what the remote
viewer first described.
The RV session is tape recorded and pen and paper are
available for the remote viewer to sketch his perceptions. Experience
has shownl that some remote viewers prefer to combine written and oral
descriptions, while some prefer to work sequentially.
The average RV session is approximately 30 minutes and
never exceeds 60 minutes.
(4) POST-SESSION ANALYSIS
After the RV session is over, the remote viewer and
interviewer obtain from the TPS specific information about the target
and compare their session results with these data. The remote viewer and
the interviewer discuss the session results. The purpose of this post-
session analysis is to provide the remote viewer with the satisfaction
of knowing how well he or she did.
a. General Remote Viewing
The foregoing has described the use of coordinates to obtain
from a remote viewer the description of that site. Another approach to
the same goal is to access the target site on the basis of focusing on a
person rather than a coordinate. For example, the remote viewer is provided
some personal information and then proceeds to describe the location of
the individual. Thus, the individual serves as a beacon to locate the
target by RV. To standardize this approach, the procedure described in
paragraph 6 is modified as follows.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000/0 / 7 ? DP96-00788ROO1300070001-1
The elements of this procedure consist of (1) target selection;
(2) remote viewer session preliminaries; (3) activity of person who serves
as beacon; (4) remote viewing session; and (5) post-session analysis.
(1) TARGET SELECTION
A target pool of 50 to 100 targets will be selected by a
TPS. The targets chosen will be distinctive, but to include more than
one example of each type. This precludes the remote viewer from eliminating
a target type because one example was used before. The remote viewer is
informed that the target pool consists of similar as well as different
types of targets. All other aspects of the target selection element of
the procedure remain the same.
(2) REMOTE VIEWER SESSION PRELIMINARIES
(3) ACTIVITY OF PERSON WHO SERVES AS BEACON
At the beginning of the RV session, the remote viewer and
interviewer are given one or more items of biographical information con-
cerning, or may even meet briefly (for 3 to 5 minutes), the individual
serving as the beacon. If the latter is the case, the beacon individual
departs the meeting and obtains the target from the TPS. This procedure
eliminates the possibility of the beacon individual divulging any hint
of the target. The beacon individual travels to the target, arriving
there at a previously specified time. He or she then interacts with
the site for the predetermined length of time of the RV session.
(4) REMOTE VIEWING SESSION
(5) POST-SESSION ANALYSIS
9%20 1-
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000/ DP96-00788R001300070001-1
ftf
Currently envisioned military RV applications will draw on
general RV techniques utilized in coordinate and beacon RV. To stan-
dardize this approach the procedures described in paragraph 6 and 7a is
modified, as follows.
(1) TARGET SELECTION
Tactical targets will be selected from U.S. military units
involved in military exercises; they will range over field test units with
military vehicles such as tanks and helicopters which are instrumented to
determine their spatial location throughout a field trial, operational
units involved in routine field exercises and small units likely to
undertake no-notice exercises.
(2) REMOTE VIEWING SESSION PRELIMINARIES
This element consists of the basic RV procedure, augmented
by a briefing on some known aspects of the target.
(3) ACTIVITY AT TARGET
Target activity will be as prescribed by the commanders
and umpires and will be totally independent of the RV session.
(4) REMOTE VIEWING SESSION
(5) POST-SESSION ANALYSIS
After the RV session is over, the remote viewer and inter-
viewer discuss the session results and formulate specific questions about
the target activity, location, and state during the period of RV. When
information on the military exercise is available the interviewer and the
remote viewer compare it with the session results. The purpose of this
post-session analysis is to provide the remote viewer with the satisfac-
tion of knowing how well the remote viewer performed.
or* EM A04 R~~
*AP am 1%0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000/ nm DP96-00788R001300070001-1
ftf 00a
AMSAA-sponsored RV will exclude non program-associated U.S.,
allied, or neutral nation's citizens as targets.
10. (S) PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
SRI International is the performing organization.
11. (S) PROJECTED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF REMOTE VIEWERS AND INTERVIEWERS
? 8 active duty Army military officers
? 8 DA civilians (GS 12 and above)
? 3 AMSAA civilian consultants (retired general officers)
? 3 SRI International employees
? 9 SRI International Consultants
Persons involved will principally occupy the role of either remote
viewer or interviewer, but there may be some exchange of roles.
12. (S) SELECTION OF REMOTE VIEWERS AND INTERVIEWERS
A number of Army personnel were introduced to the RV phenomena by
a guest speaker presentation on the subject. Following this initial
introduction, others became familiar with the phenomena through the
circulation of open literature publications on RV. Discussions about
the military applications of RV phenomena by interested analysts resulted
in a decision by AMSAA management to seek establishment of a program to
define the military utility of the process. Individuals who had previously
shown an interest in the potential application of the RV process were
invited to participate as a remote viewer or interviewer. Individuals
desiring to participate in these tasks were accepted. Other individuals
selected after the initial participants were identified were given an
orientation on the phenomena and asked to read published materials on RV.
After a familiarization with the RV process and procedures, individuals
were asked if they would be willing to participate as a remote viewer
or interviewer. Only those individuals who indicated a positive desire
to participate were accepted.
e 11 OR r% IN, qF
*.F mm x.%16 .
no Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000/0 / 7 ? I DP96-007i~8 ~g01300070001-1
%F in 1-7-0
In addition to Army personnel, SRI International has additional
/
individuals who are participating as remote viewers; some of these are
consultants, others are members of the SRI staff. As with the Army
participants, only those individuals who indicated a positive desire to
participate after familiarization with the RV process and procedures were
accepted-. An information sheet for participants is included here as Tab D.
It is proposed to conduct up to 40 RV sessions per month, up to a
maximum of 200 RV sessions during the contract year. For each participant,
the number of RV sessions is not to exceed 2 per day, and not to exceed
10 per week.
The recorded RV images are independently evaluated by one or more
judges in the following manner to semi-quantitatively determine the
correspondence of the RV results to the intended remote targets.
1. Determine the principle concepts (PC) stated in the images
recorded in each RV session transcript.
2. At each target site blind judge the correspondence, on a
scale of 0 to 10, of each PC of each transcript.
3. Calculate the mean and variance of all the judged PCs of
each RV session for each target.
4. Rank the correspondence of each RV session for each target
using the calculated mean values.
5. Review the correspondence ranking utilizing any drawings
or sketches to fine-tune the rankings to establish a final judged rank
ordering of each RV session with each target.
15. (S) CONFIDENTIALITY
Individuals performing as remote viewers and interviewers under the
SRI International GRILL FLAME programs will not be identified without their
prior consent and they will be referred to in project records only by an
alpha-numeric designator. Products of remote viewers and interviewer such
OW I" 'P%
ftf No %0
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 2000/ / DP96-00788R001300070001-1
ftl no 'WW
as tapes, drawings, transcripts, rosters, or other materials which might
reveal the identity of the remote viewer will be coded to assure the
protection of their identity.
16. (S) PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
RV sessions will be conducted in an ordinary room at ambient tempera-
ture and humidity during the normal waking hours of the participants.
w ~ ^ A r T
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
 Approved For Release 200010 7 ? I DP96-00788R001300070001-1
1. Puthoff, H. E. and Targ, R., "A Perceptual Channel for Information
Transfer Over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent
Research," IEEE Proceedings, Vol. 64, No. 3 (March 1976).
2. Puthoff, H. E. and Targ, R., "State of the Art in Remote Viewing
Studies at SRI,` 1977 Proceedings, IEEE, of International Conference
on Cybernetics and Society.
3. Bisaha, J. P. and Dunne, B. J., "Multiple Subject and Long Distance
Precognitive Remote Viewing of Geographical Locations," 1977
Proceedings, IEEE, of International Conferences on Cybernetics of
Society.
4. Puthoff, H. E., Targ, R., and May, E. C., "(S) Advanced Threat
Technique Assessment (U)," Stanford Research Institute Final Report
Covering Period from 14 April 1976 to 15 April 1977 (July 1977).
5. Puthoff, H. E., Targ, P., May, E. C. and Swann, I., "(S) Advanced
Threat Technique Assessment (U)," SRI International Final Report,
Covering Period from 18 April 1977 to 18 April 1978 (October 1978).
ame W. &"
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001300070001-1
 Approved For Release f JiWt!f7A: ?~IF FE6b00788R001300070001-1
TAB A
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 64, NO. 3, MARCH 1976 (U)
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001300070001-1
 Qnnr~~/p(~ UNCLASSIFIED
PROCEEDINa~9'OF'TITETEFE0, CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
A Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer
over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective
and Recent Research
CPYRGHT
HAROLD E. PUTHOFF, MEMBER, IEEE, AND RUSSELL TARG, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE
Abstract-For more than 100 years, scientists have attempted to
determine the truth or falsity of claims for the existence of a perceptual
channel whereby certain individuals are able to perceive and describe
remote data not presented to any known sense. This paper presents an
outline of the history of scientific inquiry into such so-called paranor-
mal perception and surveys the current state of the art in parapsycho-
logical research in the United States and abroad. The nature of this
perceptual channel is examined in a series of experiments carried out
in the Electronics and Bioengineering Laboratory of Stanford Research
Institute. The perceptual modality most extensively investigated is the
ability of both experienced subjects and inexperienced volunteers to
view, by innate mental processes, remote geographical or technical
targets including buildings, roads, and laboratory apparatus. The ac-
cumulated data indicate that the phenomenon is not a sensitive func-
tion of distance, and Faraday cage shielding does not in any apparent
way degrade the quality and accuracy of perception. On the basis of
this research, some areas of physics are suggested from which a descrip-
tion or explanation of the phenomenon could be forthcoming.
1. INTRODUCTION
"IT IS THE PROVINCE of natural science to investigate
nature, impartially and without prejudice" [ 1 ] . Nowhere
in scientific inquiry has this dictum met as great a chal-
lenge as in the area of so-called extrasensory perception (ESP),
the detection of remote stimuli not mediated by the usual
sensory processes. Such phenomena, although under scientific
consideration for over a century, have historically been fraught
with unreliability and controversy, and validation of the phe-
nomena by accepted scientific methodology has been slow in
coming. Even so, a recent survey conducted by the British
publication New Scientist revealed that 67 percent of nearly
1500 responding readers (the majority of whom are working
scientists and technologists) considered ESP to be an estab-
lished fact or a likely possibility, and 88 percent held the
investigation of ESP to be a legitimate scientific undertaking
[2].
A review of the literature reveals that although experiments
by reputable researchers yielding positive results were begun
over a century ago (e.g., Sir William Crookes' study of D. D.
Home, 1860's) [31, many consider the study of these phe-
nomena as only recently emerging from the realm of quasi-
science. One reason for this is that, despite experimental
results, no satisfactory theoretical construct had been advanced
to correlate data or to predict new experimental outcomes.
Consequently, the area in question remained for a long time
in the recipe stage reminiscent of electrodynamics before the
Manuscript received July 25, 1975; revised November 7, 1975. The
submission of this paper was encouraged after review of an advance
proposal. This work was supported by the Foundation for Parasensory
Investigation and the Parapsychology Foundation, New York, NY; the
Institute of Noetic Sciences, Palo Alto, CA; and the National Aero-
nautics and Space Administration, under Contract NAS 7-100.
The authors are with the Electronics and Bioengineering Laboratory,
Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
unification brought about by the work of Ampere, Faraday,
and Maxwell. Since the early work, however, we have seen the
development of information theory, quantum theory, and
neuro physiological research, and these disciplines provide
powerful conceptual tools that appear to bear directly on the
issue. In fact, several physicists (Section V) are now of the
opinion that these phenomena are not at all inconsistent with
the framework of modern physics: the often-held view that
observations of this type are a priori incompatible with known
laws is erroneous in that such a concept is based on the naive
'realism prevalent before the development of quantum theory.
In the emerging view, it is accepted that research in this area
can be conducted so as to uncover not just a catalog of inter-
esting events, but rather patterns of cause-effect relationships
of the type that lend themselves to analysis and hypothesis
in the forms with which we are familiar in the physical
sciences. One hypothesis is that information transfer under
conditions of sensory shielding is mediated by extremely
low-frequency (ELF) electromagnetic waves, a proposal that
does not seem to be ruled out by any obvious physical or
biological facts. Further, the development of information
theory makes it possible to characterize and quantify the
performance of a communications channel regardless of
the underlying mechanism.
For the past three years, we have had a program in the
Electronics and Bioengineering Laboratory of the Stan-
ford Research Institute (SRI) to investigate those facets of
human perception that appear to fall outside the range of well-
understood perceptual/processing capabilities. Of particular
interest is a human information-accessing capability that we
call "remote viewing." This phenomenon pertains to the
ability of certain individuals to access and describe, by means
of mental processes, information sources blocked from ordi-
nary perception, and generally accepted as secure against such
access.
In particular, the phenomenon we have investigated most
extensively is the ability of a subject to view remote geograph-
ical locations up to several thousand kilometers distant from
his physical location (given only a known person on whom to
target).' We have carried out more than fifty experiments
under controlled laboratory conditions with several individuals
whose remote perceptual abilities have been developed suf-
ficiently to allow them at times to describe correctly-often in
great detail-geographical or technical material such as build-
ings, roads, laboratory apparatus, and the like.
As observed in the laboratory, the basic phenomenon appears
to cover a range of subjective experiences variously referred to
'Our initial work in this area was reported in Nature f 4l, and re-
printed in the IEEE Commun. Soc. Newsletter, vol. 13, Jan. 1975.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
CPYRGHTApproved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
330 PRfCF.F.iIiN(S nF THE iFFF McRrrr fo~~
Fig. 1. Airport in San Andres, Colombia, used as remote-viewing target, along with sketch produced by subject
in California.
in the literature as autoscopy (in the medical literature); exteri-
orization or disassociation (psychological literature); simple
clairvoyance, traveling clairvoyance, or out-of-body experience
(parapsychological literature); or astral projection (occult liter-
ature). We choose the term "remote viewing" as a neutral
descriptive term free from prior associations and bias as to
mechanisms.
The development at SRI of a successful experimental pro-
cedure to elicit this capability has evolved to the point where
persons such as visiting government scientists and contract
monitors, with no previous exposure to such concepts, have
learned to perform well; and subjects who have trained over a
one-year period have performed excellently under a variety of
experimental conditions. Our accumulated data thus indicate
that both specially selected and unselected persons can be
assisted in developing remote perceptual abilities up to a
level of useful information transfer.
In experiments of this type, we have three principal findings.
First, we have established that it is possible to obtain signifi-
cant amounts of accurate descriptive information about remote
locations. Second, an increase in the distance from a few
meters up to 4000 km separating the subject from the scene
to be perceived does not in any apparent way degrade the
quality or accuracy of perception. Finally, the use of Faraday
cage electrical shielding does not prevent high-quality descrip-
tions from being obtained.
To build a coherent theory for the explanation of these
phenomena, it is necessary to have a clear understanding of
what constitutes the phenomena. In this paper, we first briefly
summarize previous efforts in this field in Section II. We then
present in Sections III and IV the results of a series of more
than fifty experiments with nine subjects carried out in our
own laboratory, which represent a sufficiently stable data base
to permit testing of various hypotheses concerning the func-
tioning of this channel. Finally, in Section V, we indicate
those areas of physics and information theory that appear to
be relevant to an understanding of certain aspects of the
phenomena.
First, however, we present an illustrative example generated
in an early pilot experiment. As will be clear from our later
discussion, this is not a "best-ever" example, but rather a
typical sample of the level of proficiency that can be reached
and that we have come to expect in our research.
Three subjects participated in a long-distance experiment
focusing on a series of targets in Costa Rica. These subjects
said they had never been to Costa Rica. In this experiment,
one of the experimenters (Dr. Puthoff) spent ten days traveling
through Costa Rica on a combination business /pleasure trip.
This information was all that was known to the subjects about
the traveler's itinerary. The experiment called for Dr. Puthoff
to keep a detailed record of his location and activities, includ-
ing photographs of each of seven target days at 1330 PDT.
A total of twelve daily descriptions were collected before the
traveler's return: six responses from one subject, five from
another, and one from a third.
The third subject who submitted the single response supplied
a drawing for a day in the middle of the series. (The subject's
response, together with the photographs taken at the site, are
shown in Fig. 1). Although Costa Rica is a mountainous
country, the subject unexpectedly perceived the traveler at a
beach and ocean setting. With some misgiving, he described an
airport on a sandy beach and an airstrip with the ocean at the
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
UNCLASSIFIED
 CPYRGHT UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
PUTHOFF AND TARG: PERCEPTUAL CHANNEL FOR INFORMATION TRANSFER
end (correct). An airport building also was drawn, and shown
to have a large rectangular overhang (correct). The traveler
had taken an unplanned one-day side trip to an offshore island
and at the time of the experiment had just disembarked from a
plane at a small island airport as described by the subject
4000 km away. The sole discrepancy was that the subject's
drawing showed a Quonset-hut type of building in place of the
rectangular structure.
The above description was chosen as an example to illustrate
a major point observed a number of times throughout the
program to be described. Contrary to what may be expected,
a subject's description does not necessarily portray what may
reasonably be expected to be correct (an educated or "safe"
guess), but often runs counter even to the subject's own
expectations.
We wish to stress again that a result such as the above is not
unusual. The remaining submissions in this experiment pro-
vided further examples of excellent correspondences between
target and response. (A target period of poolside relaxation
was identified; a drive through a tropical forest at the base of
a truncated volcano was described as a drive through a jungle
below a large bare table mountain; a hotel-room target descrip-
tion, including such details as rug color, was correct; and so
on.) So as to determine whether such matches were simply
fortuitous-that is, could reasonably be expected on the basis
of chance alone-Dr. Puthoff was asked after he had returned
to blind match the twelve descriptions to his seven target
locations. On the basis of this conservative evaluation proce-
dure, which vastly underestimates the statistical significance
of the individual descriptions, five correct matches were ob-
tained. his number of matches is significant at p = 0.02 by
exact binomial calculation z
The observation of such unexpectedly high-quality descrip-
tions early in our program led to a large-scale study of the
phenomenon at SRI under secure double-blind conditions (i.e.,
target unknown to experimenters as well as subjects), with
independent random target selection and blind judging. The
results, presented in Sections III and IV, provide strong evi-
dence for the robustness of this phenomenon whereby a
human perceptual modality of extreme sensitivity can detect
complex remote stimuli.
11. BACKGROUND
Although we are approaching the study of these phenomena
as physicists, it is not yet possible to separate ourselves entirely
from the language of the nineteenth century when the labora-
tory study of the paranormal was begun. Consequently, we
continue to use terms such as "paranormal," "telepathy," and
the like. However, we intend only to indicate a process of
information transfer under conditions generally accepted as
secure against such transfer and with no prejudice or occult
assumptions as to the mechanisms involved. As in any other
scientific pursuit, the purpose is to collect the observables that
result from experiments and to try to determine the functional
relationships between these observables and the laws of physics
as they are currently understood.
2 The probability of a correct daily match by chance for any given
transcript is p = +. Therefore, the probability of at least five correct
matches by chance out of twelve tries can be calculated from
12 121 (1 -1,
P = ~ =
t ! (12-)! 0.02.
7 7
Organized research into so-called psychic functioning began
roughly in the time of J. J. Thomson, Sir Oliver Lodge, and
Sir William Crookes, all of whom took part in the founding of
the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) in 1882 in England.
Crookes, for example, carried out his principal investigations
with D. D. Home, a Scotsman who grew up in America and
returned to England in 1855 [3]. According to the notebooks
and published reports of Crookes, Home had demonstrated
the ability to cause objects to move without touching them.
We should note in passing that, Home, unlike most subjects,
worked only in the light and spoke out in the strongest pos-
sible terms against the darkened seance rooms popular at the
time [5].
Sir William Crookes was a pioneer in the study of electrical
discharge in gases and in the development of vacuum tubes,
some types of which still bear his name. Although everything
Crookes said about electron beams and plasmas was accepted,
nothing he said about the achievements of D. D. Home ever
achieved that status. Many of his colleagues, who had not
observed the experiments with Home, stated publicly that they
thought Crookes had been deceived, to which Crookes angrily
responded:
Will not my critics give me credit for some amount of common
sense? Do they not imagine that the obvious precautions, which
occur to them as soon as they sit down to pick holes in my
experiments, have occurred to me also in the course of my.pro-
longed and patient investigation? The answer to this, as to all
other objections is, prove it to be an error, by showing where
the error lies, or if a trick, by showing how the trick is per-
formed. Try the experiment fully and fairly. If then fraud be
found, expose it; if it be a truth, proclaim it. This is the only
scientific procedure, and it is that I propose steadily to pursue
[3].
In the United States, scientific interest in the paranormal
was centered in the universities. In 1912, John Coover [6]
was established in the endowed Chair of Psychical Research at
Stanford University. In the 1920's, Harvard University set up
research programs with George Estabrooks and L. T. Troland
[7], [8]. It was in this framework that, in 1930, William
McDougall invited Dr. J. B. Rhine and Dr. Louisa Rhine to
join the Psychology Department at Duke University [9]. For
more than 30 years, significant work was carried out at Rhine's
Duke University Laboratory. To examine the existence of
paranormal perception, he used the now-famous ESP cards
containing a boldly printed picture of a star, cross, square,
circle, or wavy lines. Subjects were asked to name the order
of these cards in a freshly shuffled deck of twenty-five such
cards. To test for telepathy, an experimenter would look at
the cards one at a time, and a subject suitably separated from
the sender would attempt to determine which card was being
viewed.
Dr. J. B. Rhine together with Dr. J. G. Pratt carried out
thousands of experiments of this type under widely varying
conditions [ 10 ] . The statistical results from these experiments
indicated that some individuals did indeed possess a paranor-
mal perceptual ability in that it was possible to obtain an
arbitrarily high degree of improbability by continued testing
of a gifted subject.
The work of Rhine has been challenged on many grounds,
however, including accusations of improper handling of statis-
tics, error, and fraud. With regard to the statistics, the general
consensus of statisticians today is that if fault is to be found
in Rhine's work, it would have to be on other than statistical
gi? nf-l [11] with rn$orA fn tha ~rrnc~tinnc of franrl~ fhP
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
UNCLASSIFIED
 qq~ ppRC~cQtH T UNCLASSIFIED
CY For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, MARCH 1976
most celebrated case of criticism of Rhine's work, that of
G. R. Price [121, ended 17 years after it began when the
accusation of fraud was retracted by its author in an article
entitled "Apology to Rhine and Soal," published in the same
journal in which it was first put forward [ 13 1. It should also
be noted that parapsychological researchers themselves re-
cently exposed fraud in their own laboratory when they
encountered it [ 14 1.
At the end of the 1940's, Prof. S. G. Soal, an English mathe-
matician working with the SPR, had carried out hundreds of
card guessing experiments involving tens of thousands of calls
[ 15 1. Many of these experiments were carried out over ex-
tended distances. One of the most notable experiments was
conducted with Mrs. Gloria Stewart between London and
Antwerp. This experiment gave results whose probability of
occurring by chance were less than 10-8. With the publication
of Modern Experiments in Telepathy by Soal and Bateman
(both of whom were statisticians), it appeared that card guess-
ing experiments produced significant results, on the average.3
The most severe criticism of all this work, a criticism diffi-
cult to defend against in principle, is that leveled by the well-
known British parapsychological critic C. E. M. Hansel [ 17 ],
who began his examination of the ESP hypothesis with the
stated assumption, "In view of the a priori arguments against
it we know in advance that telepathy, etc., cannot occur."
Therefore, based on the "a priori unlikelihood" of ESP,
Hansel's examination of the literature centered primarily on
the possibility of fraud, by subjects or investigators. He
reviewed in depth four experiments which he regarded as
providing the best evidence of ESP: the Pearce-Pratt distance
series [ 18 ] ; the Pratt-Woodruff [19] series, both conducted
at Duke; and Soal's work with Mrs. Stewart and Basil Shackle-
ton [ 15 1, as well as a more recent series by Soal and Bowden
[20]. Hansel showed, in each case, how fraud could have been
committed (by the experimenters in the Pratt Woodruff and
Soal-Bateman series, or by the subjects in the Pearce-Pratt
and Soal-Bowden experiments). He gave no direct evidence
that fraud was committed in these experiments, but said, "If
the result could have arisen through a trick, the experiment
must be considered unsatisfactory proof of ESP, whether or
not it is finally decided that such a trick was in fact used " [ 17,
p. 181. As discussed by Honorton in a review of the field
[211, Hansel's conclusion after 241 pages of careful scrutiny
therefore was that these experiments were not "fraud-proof"
and therefore in principle could not serve as conclusive proof
of ESP.
Even among the supporters of ESP research and its results,
there remained the consistent problem that many successful
subjects eventually lost their ability and their scores gradually
drifted toward chance results. This decline effect in no way
erased their previous astronomical success; but it was a disap-
pointment since if paranormal perception is a natural ability,
one would like to see subjects improving with practice rather
than getting worse.
One of the first successful attempts to overcome the decline
effect was in Czechoslovakia in the work of Dr. Milan Ryzl, a
chemist with the Institute of Biology of the Czechoslovakian
Academy of Science and also an amateur hypnotist [221.
Through the use of hypnosis, together with feedback and
3Recently, some of the early Soal experiments have been criticized
(16 (. However, his long-distance experiments cited here were judged
in a double-blind fashion of the type that escaped the criticism of the
early experiments.
Appromad For R010220 2000102107
reinforcement, he developed several outstanding subjects, one
of whom, Pavel Stepanek, has worked with experimenters
around the world for more than 10 years.
Ryzl's pioneering work came as an answer to the questions
raised by the 1956 CIBA Foundation conference on extra-
sensory perception. The CIBA Chemical Company has annual
meetings on topics of biological and chemical interest, and
that same year they assembled several prominent parapsy-
chologists to have a state-of-the-art conference on ESP [23].
The conference concluded that little progress would be made
in parapsychology research until a repeatable experiment
could be found; namely, an experiment that different experi-
menters could repeat at will and that would reliably yield a
statistically significant result.
Ryzl had by 1962 accomplished that goal. His primary con-
tribution was a decision to interact with the subject as a per-
son, to try to build up his confidence and ability. His protocol
depended on "working with" rather than "running" his sub-
jects. Ryzl's star subject, Pavel Stepanek, has produced highly
significant results with many contemporary researchers [24]-
[29]. In these experiments, he was able to tell with 60-percent
reliability whether a hidden card was green side or white
side up, yielding statistics of a million to one with only a
thousand trials.
As significant as such results are statistically, the information
channel is imperfect, containing noise along with the signal.
When considering how best to use such a channel, one is led
to the communication theory concept of the introduction of
redundancy as a means of coding a message to combat the
effects of a noisy channel [30]. A prototype experiment by
Ryzl using such techniques has proved to be successful. Ryzl
had an assistant select randomly five groups of three digits
each. These 15 digits were then encoded into binary form and
translated into a sequence of green and white cards in sealed
envelopes. By means of repeated calling and an elaborate
majority vote protocol, Ryzl was able after 19 350 calls by
Stepanek (averaging 9 s per call) to correctly identify all 15
numbers, a result significant at p = 10-15 The hit rate for
individual calls was 61.9 percent, 11 978 hits, and 7372 misses
[31].
Note Added in Proof: It has been brought to our attention
that a similar procedure was recently used to transmit without
error the word "peace" in International Morse Code (J. C.
Carpenter, "Toward the effective utilization of enhanced
weak-signal ESP effects," presented at the Annual Meeting of
the American Association for the Advancement of Science,
New York, NY, Jan. 27, 1975).
The characteristics of such a channel can be specified in
accordance with the precepts of communication theory. The
bit rate associated with the information channel is calculated
from [30]
R = H(x)- Hy(x)
where H(x) is the uncertainty of the source message containing
symbols with a priori probability pi :
2
H(x), Pi 1092 Pi
i=1
and Hy (x) is the conditional entropy based on the a posteriori
probabilities that a received signal was actually transmitted:
2
Hy(x) =- L' p(i, j) loge Pi(/). (3)
1,1=1
CIA-RD1296-00722ROW 300070004 -4
UNCLASSIFIED
 .CPYRGHT UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01300070001-1
PUTHOFF AND TARG: PERCEPTUAL CHANNEL FOR INFORMATION TRANSFER
For Stepanek's run, with pi _, pi (j) = 0.619, and an average
time of 9 s per choice, we have a source uncertainty H(x) = 1
bit and a calculated bit rate
R/T - 0.0046 bit/s.
(Since the 15-digit number (49.8 bits) actually was transmitted
at the rate of 2.9 X 10-4 bit/s, an increase in bit rate by a
factor of about 20 could be expected on the basis of a coding
scheme more optimum than that used in the experiments. See,
for example, Appendix A.)
Dr. Charles Tart at the University of California has written
extensively on the so-called decline effect. He considers that
having subjects attempt to guess cards, or perform any other
repetitious task for which they receive no feedback, follows
the classical technique for deconditioning any response. He
thus considers card guessing "a technique for extinguishing
psychic functioning in the laboratory" [321.
Tart's injunctions of the mid-sixties were being heeded at
Maimonides Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, by a team of researchers
that included Dr. Montague Ullman, who was director of
research for the hospital; Dr. Stanley Krippner; and, later,
Charles Honorton. These three worked together for several
years on experiments on the occurrence of telepathy in dreams.
In the course of a half-dozen experimental series, they found
in their week-long sessions a number of subjects who had
dreams that consistently were highly descriptive of pictorial
material that a remote sender was looking at throughout the
night. This work is described in detail in the experimenters'
book Dream Telepathy [33]. Honorton is continuing work
of this free-response type in which the subject has no precon-
ceived idea as to what the target may be.
In his more recent work with subjects in the waking state,
Honorton is providing homogeneous stimulation to the subject
who is to describe color slides viewed by another person in a
remote room. In this new work, the subject listens to white
noise via earphones and views an homogeneous visual field
imposed through the use of Ping-Pong ball halves to cover the
subject's eyes in conjunction with diffuse ambient illumina-
tion. In this so-called Ganzfeld setting, subjects are again able,
now in the waking state, to give correct and often highly
accurate descriptions of the material being viewed by the
sender [34].
In Honorton's work and elsewhere, it apparently has been
the step away from the repetitive forced-choice experiment
that has opened the way for a wide variety of ordinary people
to demonstrate significant functioning in the laboratory, with-
out being bored into a decline effect.
This survey would be incomplete if we did not indicate
certain aspects of the current state of research in the USSR.
It is clear from translated documents and other sources [351
that many laboratories in the USSR are engaged in paranormal
research.
Since the 1930's, in the laboratory of L. Vasiliev (Leningrad
Institute for Brain Research), there has been an interest in the
use of telepathy as a method of influencing the behavior of a
person at a distance. In Vasiliev's book Experiments in Mental
Suggestion, he makes it very clear that the bulk of his labora-
tory's experiments were aimed at long-distance communica-
tion combined with a form of behavior modification; for
example, putting people at a distance to sleep through hyp-
nosis [36].
Similar behavior modification types of experiments have been
carried out in recent times by I. M. Kogan, Chairman of the
Bioinformation Section of the Moscow Board of the Popov
Society. He is a Soviet engineer who, until 1969, published
extensively on the theory of telepathic communication [371-
[401. He was concerned with three principal kinds of experi-
ments: mental suggestion without hypnosis over short dis-
tances, in which the percipient attempts to identify an object;
mental awakening over short distances, in which a subject is
awakened from a hypnotic sleep at the "beamed" suggestion
from the hypnotist; and long-range (intercity) telepathic com-
munication. Kogan's main interest has been to quantify the
channel capacity of the paranormal channel. He finds that the
bit rate decreases from 0.1 bit/s for laboratory experiments
to 0.005 bit/s for his 1000-km intercity experiments.
In the USSR, serious consideration is given to the hypothesis
that telepathy is mediated by extremely low-frequency (ELF)
electromagnetic propagation. (The pros and cons of this
hypothesis are discussed in Section V of this paper.) In
general, the entire field of paranormal research in the USSR
is part of a larger one concerned with the interaction between
electromagnetic fields and living organisms [41], [42). At
the First International Congress on Parapsychology and
Psychotronics in Prague, Czechoslovakia, in 1973, for example,
Kholodov spoke at length about the susceptibility of living
systems to extremely low-level ac and dc fields. He described
conditioning effects on the behavior of fish resulting from the
application of 10 to 100 ?W of RF to their tank [43]. The
USSR take these data seriously in that the Soviet safety re-
quirements for steady-state microwave exposure set limits
at '10?W/cm2 , whereas the United States has set a steady-state
limit of 10 mW/cm2 [441. Kholodov spoke also about the
nonthermal effects of microwaves on animals' central nervous
systems. His experiments were very carefully carried out and
are characteristic of a new dimension in paranormal research.
The increasing importance of this area in Soviet research was
indicated recently when the Soviet Psychological Association
issued an unprecedented position paper calling on the Soviet
Academy of Sciences to step up efforts in this area (451.
They recommended that the newly formed Psychological
Institute within the Soviet Academy of Sciences and the
Psychological Institute of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences
review the area and consider the creation of a new laboratory
within one of the institutes to study persons with unusual
abilities. They also recommended a comprehensive evaluation
of experiments and theory by the Academy of Sciences' Insti-
tute of Biophysics and Institute for the Problems of Informa-
tion Transmission.
The Soviet research, along with other behavioristically
oriented work, suggests that in addition to obtaining overt
responses such as verbalizations or key presses from a subject,
it should be possible to obtain objective evidence of informa-
tion transfer by direct measurement of physiological parame-
ters of a subject. Kamiya, Lindsley, Pribram, Silverman,
Walter, and others brought together to discuss physiological
methods to detect ESP functioning, have suggested that a
whole range of electroencephalogram (EEG) responses such as
evoked potentials (EP's), spontaneous EEG, and the contingent
negative variation (CNV) might be sensitive indicators of the
detection of remote stimuli not mediated by usual sensory
processes [46].
Early experimentation of this type was carried out by
Douglas Dean at the Newark College of Engineering. In his
UNCLASSIFIED
 CPYRGHT UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01300070001-1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, MARCH 1976
search for physiological correlates of information transfer, he
used the plethysmograph to measure changes in the blood
system functioning [47]. A plethysmographic measurement
was made on the finger of a subject during telepathy experi-
ments. A sender looked at randomly selected target cards
consisting of names known to the subject, together with names
unknown to him (selected at random from a telephone book).
The names of the known people were contributed by the sub-
found significant changes in the chart recording of finger
blood volume when the remote sender was looking at those
work by Lloyd [491, and most recently the work by the
recorded. Meanwhile, in another laboratory, a second person
is marked on the magnetic-tape recording of the subject's EEG.
are as compared with the nonstimulus periods.
tion, we noted that in previous work others had attempted,
observed by another subject [50]. In a discussion of that
temporal characteristics of the information channel, it might
fore, in our study we chose to use a stroboscopic flash train of
10-s duration as the remote stimulus.
In the design of the study, we assumed that the application
of the remote stimulus would result in responses similar to
those obtained under conditions of direct stimulation. For
example, when an individual is stimulated with a low-
driving of the brain waves at the frequency of the flashes [52 1.
manner (a putative sender), the EEG of another subject in a
changes in alpha (9-11 Hz) activity and possibly an EEG
driving similar to that of the sender, or other coupling to the
sender's EEG [531, The receiver was seated in a visually
opaque, acoustically and electrically shielded, double-walled
steel room about 7 m from the sender. The details of the
experiment, consisting of seven runs of thirty-six 10-s trials
proved to be successful. The receiver's alpha activity (9-11 Hz)
showed a significant reduction in average power (-24 percent,
16-Hz flash stimuli as compared with periods of no-flash
(-12 percent in average power, -21 percent in peak power),
Fig. 2 shows an overlay of three averaged EEG spectra from
alpha activity during the three stimulus conditions. Extensive
ri 6
5 Hz 10 Hz 15 Hz
Fig. 2. Occipital EEG frequency spectra, 0-20 Hz, of one subject (H.H.)
acting as receiver showing amplitude changes in the 9-i 1-Hz band as a
function of strobe frequency. Three cases: 0-, 6-, and 16-Hz flashes
(twelve trial averages).
results were produced by system artifacts, electromagnetic
pickup (EMI), or subtle cueing; the results were negative [4].
As part of the experimental protocol, the subject was asked
to indicate a conscious assessment for each trial (via telegraph
key) as to the nature of the stimulus; analysis showed these
guesses to be at chance. Thus arousal as evidenced by signifi-
cant alpha blocking occurred only at the noncognitive level of
physiological response. Hence the experiment provided direct
physiological (EEG) evidence of perception of remote stimuli
even in the absence of overt cognitive response.
Whereas in our experiments we used a remote light flash as a
stimulus, Tart [48] in his work used an electrical shock to
himself as sender, and Lloyd [49] simply told the sender to
think of a red triangle each time a red warning light was
illuminated within his view. Lloyd observed a consistent
evoked potential in his subjects; whereas in our experiments
and in Tart's, a reduction in amplitude and a desynchroniza-
tion of alpha was observed-an arousal response. (If a subject
is resting in an alpha-dominant condition and he is then
stimulated, for example in any direct manner, one will observe
a desynchronization and decrease in alpha power.) We con-
sider that these combined results are evidence for the existence
of noncognitive awareness of remote happenings and that they
have a profound implication for paranormal research.
III. SRI INVESTIGATIONS OF REMOTE VIEWING
Experimentation in remote viewing began during studies
carried out to investigate the abilities of a New York artist,
Ingo Swann, when he expressed the opinion that the insights
gained during experiments at SRI had strengthened his ability
(verified in other research before he joined the SRI program)
to view remote locations [54]. To test Mr. Swann's asser-
tion, a pilot study was set up in which a series of targets from
around the globe were supplied by SRI personnel to the ex-
perimenters on a double-blind. basis. Mr. Swann's apparent
ability to describe correctly details of buildings, roads,
bridges, and the like indicated that it may be possible for
a subject by means of mental imagery to access and describe
randomly chosen geographical sites located several miles
from the subject's position and demarcated by some appro-
priate means. Therefore, we set up a research program to
test the remote-viewing hypothesis under rigidly controlled
scientific conditions.
In carrying out this program, we concentrated on what we
considered to be our principal responsibility-to resolve under
control prgcedures _ wed andert~ken to dejerjfD t . ,1}Ilgmyu}~s,ppljiggs~j, i~s}~e?cf,he~or not this
MW ror i(erea3e
UNCLASSIFIED
 CPYRGHT UNCLASSIFIED
PUTHOFF ?RMYRAC Tp IgaUF2QQQAQfUWAi1 Ag Q6-00788R001300070001-1
class of paranormal perception phenomenon exists. At all
times, we and others responsible for the overall program took
measures to prevent sensory leakage and subliminal cueing and
to prevent deception, whether intentional or unintentional.
To ensure evaluations independent of belief structures of both
experimenters and judges, all experiments were carried out
under a protocol, described below, in which target selection at
the beginning of experiments and blind judging of results at
the end of experiments were handled independently of the
researchers engaged in carrying out the experiments.
Six subjects, designated S 1 through S6, were chosen for the
study. Three were considered as gifted or experienced subjects
(SI through S3), and three were considered as learners (S4
through S6). The a priori dichotomy between gifted and
learners was based on the experienced group having been
successful in other studies conducted before this program
and the learners group being inexperienced with regard to
paranormal experimentation.
The study consisted of a series of double-blind tests with
local targets in the San Francisco Bay Area so that several in-
dependent judges could visit the sites to establish documenta-
tion. The protocol was to closet the subject with an experi-
menter at SRI and at an agreed-on time to obtain from the
subject a description of an undisclosed remote site being
visited by a target team. In each of the experiments, one of
the six program subjects served as remote-viewing subject,
and SRI experimenters served as a target demarcation team at
the remote location chosen in a double-blind protocol as
follows.
In each experiment, SRI management randomly chose a
target location from a list of targets within a 30-min driving
time from SRI; the target location selected was kept blind to
subject and experimenters. The target pool consisted of more
than 100 target locations chosen from a target-rich environ-
ment. (Before the experimental series began, the Director of
the Information Science and Engineering Division, not other-
wise associated with the experiment, established the set of lo-
cations as the target pool which remained known only to him.
The target locations were printed on cards sealed in envelopes
and kept in the SRI Division office safe. They were available
only with the personal assistance of the Division Director who
issued a single random-number selected target card that con-
stituted the traveling orders for that experiment.)
In detail: To begin the experiment, the subject was closeted
with an experimenter at SRI to wait 30 min before beginning
a narrative description of the remote location. A second ex-
perimenter then obtained from the Division Director a target
location from a set of traveling orders previously prepared and
randomized by the Director and kept under his control. The
target demarcation team, consisting of two to four SRI experi-
menters, then proceeded by automobile directly to the target
without any communication with the subject or experimenter
remaining behind. The experimenter remaining with the sub-
ject at SRI was kept ignorant of both the particular target and
the target pool so as to eliminate the possibility of cueing
(overt or subliminal) and to allow him freedom in questioning
the subject to clarify his descriptions. The demarcation team
remained at the target site for an agreed-on 15-min period
following the 30 min allotted for travel.4 During the observa-
4The first subject (Si) was allowed 30 min for his descriptions, but
it was found that he fatigued and had little comment after the first 15
min. The viewing time was therefore reduced to 15 min for subjects
S2 through S6.
tion period, the remote viewing subject was asked to describe
his impressions of the target site into a tape recorder and to
make any drawings he thought appropriate. An informal com-
parison was then made when the demarcation team returned,
and the subject was taken to the site to provide feedback.
A. Subject Si: Experienced
To begin the series, Pat Price, a former California police com-
missioner and city councilman, participated as a subject in
nine experiments. In general, Price's ability to describe
correctly buildings, docks, roads, gardens, and the like, includ-
ing structural materials, color, ambience, and activity-often
in great detail-indicated the functioning of a remote per-
ceptual ability. A Hoover Tower target., for example, was
recognized and named by name. Nonetheless, in general, the
descriptions contained inaccuracies as well as correct state-
ments. A typical example is indicated by the subject's drawing
shown in Fig. 3 in which he correctly described a park-like
area containing two pools of water: one rectangular, 60 by
89 ft (actual dimensions 75 by 100 ft); the other circular,
diameter 120 ft (actual diameter 110 ft). He incorrectly indi-
cated the function, however, as water filtration rather than
recreational swimming. (We often observe essentially correct
descriptions of basic elements and patterns coupled with in-
complete or erroneous analysis of function.) As can be seen
from his drawing, he also included some elements, such as
the tanks shown in the upper right, that are not present at the
target site. We also note an apparent left-right reversal, often
observed in paranormal perception experiments.
To obtain a numerical evaluation of the accuracy of the
remote-viewing experiment, the experimental results were
subjected to independent judging on a blind basis by an SRI
research analyst not otherwise associated with the research.
The subject's response packets, which contained the nine
typed unedited transcripts of the tape-recorded narratives
along with any associated drawings, were unlabeled and pre-
sented in random order. While standing at each target loca-
tion, visited in turn; the judge was required to blind rank order
the nine packets on a scale 1 to 9 (best to worst match). The
statistic of interest is the sum of ranks assigned to the target-
associated transcripts, lower values indicating better matches.
For nine targets, the sum of ranks could range from nine to
eighty-one. The probability that a given sum of ranks s or
less will occur by chance is given by [ 55]
(-1)1
Pr (s or less) = I
n
1
n
\1
\
N i=n 1=0
- 1`
N1
i
)
where s is obtained sum of ranks, N is number of assignable
ranks, n is number of occasions on whic rankiings wwere made,
and 1 takes on values from zero to the pose 1ve integer k
in (i - n)/t4. (Table I is a table to enable easy application of
the above formula to those cases in which N = n.) The sum in
this case, which included seven direct hits out of the nine, was
16 (see Table II), a result significant at p =.2.9 X 10-5 by
exact calculation.
In Experiments 3, 4, and 6 through 9, the subject was se-
cured in a double-walled copper-screen Faraday cage. The
Faraday cage provides 120-dB attenuation for plane-wave
radio-frequency radiation over a range of 15 kHz to 1 GHz.
For magnetic fields, the attenuation is 68 dB at 15 kHz and
decreases to 3 dB at 60 Hz. The results of rank order judging
(Table II) indicate that the use of Faraday cage electrical
Ow Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : IA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
CP%RGHApproved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE. MARCH 1976
(a) (b)
Fig. 3. Swimming pool complex as remote-viewing target. (a) City map of target location. (b) Drawing by Price (Si).
TABLE I
CRITICAL VALUES OF SUMS OF RANKS FOR PREFERENTIAL MATCHING
Number of
Assi
nable
Probability (one-tailed) that the Indicated Sum of Ranks or Less Would Occur by Chance
g
Ranks (N)
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.04
0.025
0.01
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.0005
10-4
105
10-E
10-7
4
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
5
11
10
9
8
8
7
6
6
5
5
6
16
15
13
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
7
22
20
18
18
17
15
14
12
12
11
9
8
8
29
27
24
24
22
20
19
17
16
15
13
11
9
8
9
37
34
31
30
29
26
24
22
21
20
17
14
12
10
LO
46
42
39
38
36
33
31
29
27
25
22
19
16
13
11
56
51
48
47
45
41
38
36
34
32
28
24
20
17
12
67
61
58
56
54
49
47
43
41
39
35
30
25
22
Note: This table applies only to those special cases in which the number of occasions on which objects
are being ranked (n) is equal to the number of assignable ranks (N). Each entry represents the largest
number that is significant at the indicated p-level. Source: R. L. Morris [55].
shielding does not prevent high-quality descriptions from being
As a backup judging procedure, a panel of five additional
SRI scientists not otherwise associated with the research were
asked simply to blind match the unedited typed transcripts
(with associated drawings) generated by the remote viewer
against the nine target locations which they independently
visited in turn. The transcripts were unlabeled and presented
in random order. A correct match consisted of a transcript
stead of the expected number of 1 match each per judge, the
number of correct matches obtained by the five judges was 7,
6, 5, 3, and 3, respectively. Thus, rather than the expected
total number of 5 correct matches from the judges, 24 such
Approved For RPIPagp 2000/OR/07
B. Subject S4: Learner
This experiment was designed to be a replication of our pre-
vious experiment with Price, the first replication attempted.
The subject for this experiment was Mrs. Hella Hammid, a
gifted professional photographer. She was selected for this
series on the basis of her successful performance as a per-
cipient in the EEG experiment described earlier. Outside of
that interaction, she had no previous experience with apparent
paranormal functioning.
At the time we began working with Mrs. Hammid, she had
no strong feelings about the likelihood of her ability to suc-
ceed in this task. This was in contrast to both Ingo Swann
who had come to our laboratory fresh from a lengthy and
apparently successful series of experiments with Dr. Gertrude
clAeRNo 1afieg2 0'I_1000 JJ66 4 4~j Pat Price
UNCLASSIFIED
 CPYRGHT Ip '~UQN0C UNCLASSIFIED
PUTHOFF ANN 'TAR~GVe RCE9iuAL RmL'OR'IN RQTT10 I `&A'NS''F`$R96-00788R001300070001-1
PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS TARGET
TABLE II
DISTRIBUTION OF RANKINGS ASSIGNED TO TRANSCRIPTS
ASSOCIATED WITH EACH TARGET LOCATION FOR EXPERIENCED
SUBJECT PRICE (SI)
Target Location
Distance
km
Rank of
Associated
Transcript
Hoover Tower, Stanford
3.4
1
Baylands Nature Preserve, Palo Alto
6.4
1
Radio telescope, Portola Valley
6.4
1
Marina, Redwood City
6.8
1
Bridge toll plaza, Fremont
14.5
6
Drive-in theater, Palo Alto
5.1
1
Arts and Crafts Plaza, Menlo Park
1.9
1
Catholic Church, Portola valley
8.5
3
Swimming pool complex, Palo Alto
3.4
1
Total sum of ranks
16
(p_2.9XIO-6)
scientific rigor, one of our primary tasks as researchers is to
provide an environment in which the subject feels safe to
explore the possibility of paranormal perception. With a new
subject, we also try to stress the nonuniqueness of the ability
because from our experience paranormal functioning appears
to be a latent ability that all subjects can articulate to some
degree.
Because of Mrs. Hammid's artistic background, she was ca-
pable of drawing and describing visual images that she could
not identify in any cognitive or analytic sense. When the target
demarcation team went to a target location which was a
pedestrian overpass, the subject said that she saw "a kind of
trough up in the air," which she indicated in the upper part
of her drawing in Fig. 4. She went on to explain, "If you
stand where they are standing you will see something like
this," indicating the nested squares at the bottom of Fig. 4.
As it turned out, a judge standing where she indicated would
have a view closely resembling what she had drawn, as can be
seen from the accompanying photographs of the target loca-
tion. It needs to be emphasized, however, that judges did not
have access to our photographs of the site, used here for
illustrative purposes only, but rather they proceeded to each
of the target locations by list.
In another experiment, the subject described seeing "an
open barnlike structure with a pitched roof." She also saw
a "kind of slatted side to the structure making light and dark
bars on the wall." Her drawing and a photograph of the
associated bicycle shed target are shown in Fig. 5. (Subjects
are encouraged to make drawings of anything they visualize
and associate with the remote location because drawings they
make are in general more accurate than their verbal description.)
ho
ay
of admit to seeing. Therefore, in addition to maintaining As in the original series with Price, the results of the nine-
UNCLASSIFIED
that he used his remote-viewing ability in his every-
In comparison with the latter two, many people are more
fluenced by their environment and are reluctant under
ublic scrutiny to attempt activities that are generally thought
o be impossible. Society often provides inhibition and nega-
ive feedback to the individual who might otherwise have
xplored his own nonregular perceptual ability. We all share
n historical tradition of "the stoning of prophets and the
urning of witches" and, in more modern times, the hospitaliza-
ion of those who claim to perceive things that the majority do
felt
life.
 CPXRGHT UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, MARCH 1976
BICYCLE SHED TARGET
DETAIL OF BICYCLE SHED
Fig. 5. Subject Hammid (S4) response to bicycle shed target described as an open "barn-like building" with "slats
on the sides" and a "pitched roof."
TABLE III
DISTRIBUTION OF RANKINGS ASSIGNED TO TRANSCRIPTS ASSOCIATED
WITH EACH TARGET LOCATION FOR LEARNER SUBJECT HAMMID (S4)
Target Location
Distance
(k.)
Rank of
Associated
Transcript
Methodist Church, Palo Alto
1.9
1
Ness Auditorium, Menlo Park
0.2
1
Merry-go-round, Palo Alto
3.4
1
Parking garage, Mountain View
8.1
2
SRI International Courtyard, Menlo Park
0.2
1
Bicycle shed, Menlo Park
0.1
2
Railroad trestle bridge, Palo Alto
1.3
2
Pumpkin patch, Menlo Park
1.3
1
Pedestrian overpass, Palo Alto
5.0
2
Total sum of ranks
13
(p-1.8x10-e)
experiment series were submitted for independent judging on
a blind basis by an SRI research analyst not otherwise associ-
ated with the research. While at each target location, visited
in turn, the judge was required to blind rank order the nine
unedited typed manuscripts of the tape-recorded narratives,
along with any associated drawings generated by the remote
viewer, on a scale 1 to 9 (best to worst match). The sum of
ranks assigned to the target-associated transcripts in this case
was 13, a result significant at p = 1.8 X 10-6 by exact calcula-
tion (see Table I and discussion), and included five direct hits
Again, as a backup judging procedure, a panel of five addi-
tional judges not otherwise associated with the research
were asked simply to blind match the unedited typed tran-
scripts and associated drawings generated by the remote viewer,
against the nine target locations which they independently
visited in turn. A correct match consisted of a transcript of
a given date being matched to the target of that date' In-
stead of the expected number of 1 match each per judge,
the number of correct matches obtained by the five judges
was 5, 3, 3, 2, and 2, respectively. Thus, rather than the ex-
pected total number of 5 correct matches from the judges,
15 such matches were obtained.
C. Subjects S2 and S3: Experienced
Having completed a series of 18 remote-viewing experiments,
9 each with experienced subject S 1 (Price) and learner S4
(Hammid), additional replication experiments, four with each
subject, were carried out with experienced subjects S2 (Elgin)
and S3 (Swann) and learners S5 and S6. To place the judging
on a basis comparable to that used with S I and S4, the four
transcripts each of experienced subjects S2 and S3 were com-
bined into a group of eight for rank order judging to be com-
pared with the similarly combined results of the learners
S5 and S6.
The series with S2 (Elgin, an SRI research analyst) provided
a further example of the dichotomy between verbal and draw-
ing responses. (As with medical literature, case histories often
are more illuminating than the summary of results.) The ex-
and four second ranks (Table III). _ ease 2000/00/07 p~~jxlle~t cc~rjpe~}?hg{~eyr~S, ?t~}yr~~j,rgl yFxec~ with this em-vrte
UNCLASSIFIED
 CPYRGHT UNCLASSIFIED
PUTHOFF rA 1~ ~~ ei IRI c r :g ?R?9 1 aJ ATl J 6- 00788 R001300070001-1
339
subject. It was a demonstration experiment for a government
visitor who had heard of our work and wanted to evaluate our
experimental protocol.
In the laboratory, the subject, holding a bearing compass at
arm's length, began the experiment by indicating the direction
of the target demarcation team correctly to within 50. (In all
four experiments with this subject, he has always been within
100 of the correct direction in this angular assessment.) The
subject then generated a 15-min tape-recorded description and
the drawings shown in Fig. 6.
In discussing the drawings, Elgin indicated that he was
uncertain as to the action, but had the impression that the
demarcation team was located at a museum (known to him)
in a particular park. In fact, the target was a tennis court lo-
cated in that park about 90 m from the indicated museum.
Once again, we note the characteristic (discussed earlier) of a
resemblance between the target site and certain gestalt ele-
ments of the subject's response, especially in regard to the
drawings, coupled with incomplete or erroneous analysis of
the significances. Nonetheless, when rank ordering transcripts
1 through 8 at the site, the judge ranked this transcript as 2.
This example illustrates a continuing observation that most of
the correct information related to us by subjects is of a non-
analytic nature pertaining to shape, form, color, and material
rather than to function or name.
A second example from this group, generated by S3 (Swann),
indicates the level of proficiency that can be attained with
experiments, he dictates two lists for us to record. One list
contains objects that he "sees," but does not think are located
at the remote scene. A second list contains objects that he
thinks are at the scene. In our evaluation, he has made much
progress in this most essential ability to separate memory
and imagination from paranormal inputs. This is the key to
bringing the remote-viewing channel to fruition with regard to
its potential usefulness.
The quality of transcript that can be generated by this pro-
cess is evident from the results of our most recent experiment
with Swann. The target location chosen by the usual double-
blind protocol was the Palo Alto City Hall. Swann described a
tall building with vertical columns and "set in" windows. His
sketch, together with the photograph of the site, is shown in
Fig. 7. He said there was a fountain, "but I don't hear it."
At the time the target team was at the City Hall during the
experiment, the fountain was not running. He also made an
effort to draw a replica of the designs in the pavement in front
of the building, and correctly indicated the number of trees
(four) in the sketch.
For the entire series of eight, four each from S2 and S3, the
numerical evaluation 'based on blind rank ordering of tran-
scripts at each site was significant at p = 3.8 X 10-4 and in-
cluded three direct hits and three second ranks for the target-
associated transcripts (see Table IV).
Swann, he has been studying the problem of separating the ex- out with learner subjects S5 and S6, a man and woman on the
ternal signal from the internal noise. In our most recent SRI professional staff. The results in this case, taken as a
Annrnverl Fnr Release 90001081OZ - CIA-RnP96-00Z88R001300OZ 001-1
UNCLASSIFIED
practice. In the two years since we first started working with To complete the series, four experiments each were
 CPYRGHT
UNCLASSIFIED
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, MARCH 1976
~Y MaT~~yQ ~~?
~IV~.ak- Latl; qr~?.
P.
group, did not differ significantly from chance. For the series
of eight (judged as a group of seven since one target came up
twice, once for each subject), the numerical evaluation based
on blind rank ordering of transcripts at each site was non-
significant at p = 0.08, even though there were two direct hits
and two second ranks out of the seven (see Table V).
One of the direct hits, which occurred with subject S6 in her
first experiment, provides an example of the "first-time effect"
that has been rigorously explored and is well-known to experi-
menters in the field [57]. The outbound experimenter
obtained, by random protocol from the pool, a target blind
to the experimenter with the subject, as is our standard pro-
cedure, and proceeded to the location. The subject, a mathe-
TABLE IV
DISTRIBUTION OF RANKINGS ASSIGNED To TRANSCRIPTS ASSOCIATED
WITH EACH TARGET LOCATION FOR EXPERIENCED SUBJECTS ELGIN (S2)
AND SWANN (S3)
.Subject
Target Location
Distance
(km)
Rank of
Associated
Transcript
S2
BART Station (Transit System), Fremont
16.1
1
S2
Shielded room, SRI, Menlo Park
0.1
2
S2
Tennis court, Palo Alto
3.4
2
S2
Golf course bridge, Stanford
3.4
2
S3
City Hall, Palo Alto
2.0
1
S3
Miniature golf course, Menlo Park
3.0
1
S3
Kiosk in park, Menlo Park
0.3
3
S3
Baylands Nature Preserve, Palo Alto
6.4
3
Total am of ranks
15
(p=3.8x10-4)
TABLE V
DISTRIBUTION OF RANKINGS ASSIGNED To TRANSCRIPTS ASSOCIATED
WITH EACH TARGET LOCATION FOR LEARNER SUBJECTS S5 AND S6
Sub ect
Target Location
Distance
(km)
Rank of
Associated
Transcript
S5
Pedestrian overpass, Palo Alto
5.0
3
S5
Railroad trestle bridge, Palo Alto
1.3
6
S5
Winimill, Portola Valley
8.5
2
S5, S6
White Plaza, Stanford (2)
3.8
1
S6
Airport, Palo Alto
5.5
2
S6
Kiosk in Park, Menlo Park
0.3
5
S6
Boathouse, Stanford
4.0
1
Total am of ranks
20
(p=0.08, NS)
vious experience in remote viewing, began to describe a large
square with a fountain. Four minutes into the experiment,
she recognized the location and correctly identified it by name
(see Fig. 8). (It should be noted that in the area from which
the target locations were drawn there are other fountains
as well, some of which were in the target pool.) As an ex-
ample of the style of the narratives generated during remote
viewing with inexperienced subjects and of the part played by
the experimenter remaining with the subject in such a case,
we have included the entire unedited text of this experiment
as Appendix B.
E. Normal and Paranormal: Use of Unselected Subjects in
Remote Viewing
After more than a year of following the experimental pro-
tocol described above and observing that even inexperienced
subjects generated results better than expected, we initiated a
series of experiments to explore further whether individuals
other than putative "psychics" can demonstrate the remote-
viewing ability. To test this idea, we have a continuing pro-
gram to carry out additional experiments of the outdoor type
with new subjects whom we have no a priori reason to believe
have paranormal perceptual ability. To date we have collected
data from five experiments with two individuals in this cate-
gory: a man and a woman who were visiting government
scientists interested in observing our experimental protocols.
The motivation for these particular experiments was twofold.
First, the experiments .provide data that indicate the level of
OR
11LULIULdn III tue computer science a ors ory w no a no pre- proliciency that can be expec a trom unse ecte volunteers.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO01 300070001 -1
UNCLASSIFIED
 CPYRGHT UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/07: CIA-REP 6-00788RO01 300070001 -1
PUTHOFF AND TARG: PERCEPTUAL CHANNEL FOR INFORMATION TRAN FE
Fig. 8. Subject (S6) drawing of White Plaza, Stanford University. Sub-
ject drew what she called "curvy benches" and then announced cor-
rectly that the place was "White Plaza at Stanford."
Second, when an individual observes a successful demonstra-
tion experiment involving another person as subject, it inevi-
tably occurs to him that perhaps chicanery is involved. We
have found the most effective way to settle this issue for the
observer is to have the individual himself act as a subject so as
to obtain personal experience against which our reported
results can be evaluated.
The first visitor (VI) was invited to participate as a subject
in a three-experiment series. All three experiments contained
elements descriptive of the associated target locations; the
quality of response increased with practice. The third re-
sponse is shown in Fig. 9, where again the pattern elements in
the drawing appeared to be a closer match than the subject's
analytic interpretation of the target object as a cupola.