RECRUITING

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00780R001400090038-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 25, 2003
Sequence Number: 
38
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 17, 1966
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00780R001400090038-9.pdf106.12 KB
Body: 
Approved For I Iease 2003/ RDP84-00780R001400090038-9 MU 17 June 1966 The attached memorandum for the Director of Personnel was prepared b land me as a result of your request made at a recent noon staff meeting. Mr. Warfield strongly opposes the memorandum. In view of the fact that the Office of Personnel is now heavily burdened with such matters as reorganization, installation of the skill bank, progress reporting and similar efforts, I recommend that we hold off on the attached memo until some of the existing work now under way has been completed. FRET. r',, Approved For Release 2003/05/27 : CIA-RDP 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/061-,", .111-RDP84-0078OR0$1406600 9 I S F I L. E DD/S 66 -3088 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Personnel SUBJECT : Recruiting REFERENCE : Memo to DD/S fr DD/Pers/RP dated 7 June 1966, subj: Commissioned Reserve (Clerical Recruiting) 1. The reference indicated that information was being provided which requires no action by the Deputy Director for Support. I believe, however, that it does require action if it is intended that plans previously approved by the Director of Personnel and the Deputy Director for Support are to be abandoned. 2. You will recall during recent hearings on the Combined Program Call I asked that the Office of Personnel consider the use of Correspondents, as well as Office of Security and 00 personnel, to enlarge its recruitment network. The Office of Personnel responded negatively in a memorandum dated 17 May 1966, but offered no evidence as to the depth and extent of its examinations with the other Offices concerned. 3. Before considering the reversal of my memorandum of 4 August 1965, subject: Commissioned Reserve (Clerical Recruiting), I believe it would be well for all of us to look rather closely at the alternatives involved in such action. It seems to me that a systematic examination of this problem should be based upon the following: a. Cost comparisons of the various alternatives available for recruitment activities, i.e., a cost-utility analysis for each method which could be used, indicating the cost on the one hand as compared with the benefits on the other hand. b. An examination, of sources in order to focus on the question of whether or not Agency recruiting efforts are dispersed in profitable locations. eJ?ia i,;o aatomatic a-.:A'-[IAV and Approved For Release 2003/05/27 :=CIA-RDP84-00780R0014000900 8-%6a3_t ?catI00 Approved For Release 2003/05/27 - 84-00780 R001400090038-9 2RET c. Practical methods of leveling out the recruitment workload in order to avoid peaks now so characteristic of the clerical. recruitment effort. d. What past experience has indicated, both qualitatively and quan- titatively, in terms of methods of recruitment. I would appreciate receiving from you by 15 July 1966 an analysis of the alterna - tive methods of achieving your recruitment objectives. R. L. Bannerman Deputy Director for Support Approved For Release 2003/05/27 :2CIA-RDP84-00780 R001400090038-9 Approved For Release 2003/05/27 : CIA-RDP84-00780 R001400090038-9 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2003/05/27 : CIA-RDP84-00780 R001400090038-9