GLENN INTERVIEW
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP88-01070R000200810004-5
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date:
June 27, 2008
Sequence Number:
4
Case Number:
Publication Date:
July 31, 1983
Content Type:
OPEN SOURCE
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP88-01070R000200810004-5.pdf | 96.68 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200810004-5
NBC MEET THE PRESS
31 July 1983
GLL;)~/INTERVIEW DONALDSON: Thank you. J_m. Coming up heat from St.
Petersburg, Fla., where he is campaigning. Sen. John Glenn.
Ser. Glenn than: you for Xng us today. GLENN: Thank
vou'.-4, Glad to be With vou.
go
we
DON.;~LDSON': Now. vou ve bee. very critical of resident heagan's
poll-N, in Central America. is VOL' were president of the United
States today, what would you do? GLENN: Well, I think we need
to define the vital interests of our country down there and try
to get su-Dpcr t of the ,
.1er: can people behind i t . I think we
need to get a better balance between our talk and our force
show down there. I think we need to also.... When we talk about
to the source, as the president did the other day, I think
need to remember that when, we go to the source, we need to
go to sources of some of the problem also there in LI Salvador
itself, because a lot of the problem, there is the internal
situation that they have there and the difficulties of the
people, and . . . You know. I wonder if we can connect this
because I'm getting a very bad feedback here on this whole thing.
I r getting an echo that makes it Very dl:ffa,cult to talk. Can
we check that, please.
We'll check i t , John. Go ahead. GLENN: Good.
DONALDSON: Go ahead. Well check it While vou keep telling us
about what you'd d0 as president in Central America. GLENT:
Okay Tine. What I -as saying is that I think we need to go
for the support of the American people oefining the vital
interests down,
there' We need also to find a better balance
between our talk and our show of force in that par tieular
area. And I think that when we go into that area and talk
about going to the source, as the president did, and then
intimate that that is Cuba or that's the Soviet Union, it also
is indigenous ir. the country itself down there. We have great
^.7Obe^F n that area :,en we nave the right'wirg death squads
}.ilii'g CeoPle with _-p unity from out of the government
C:rcies itself and effect driving ?eopie into the hills and
nto the support of the guerrilla movement there. It }ust
leaves a great deal to be desired In our whole posture there.
'L -'E been very confusing. We have Amoassador Stone. Dick Stone
there, and then we have the Con'tadcra Group that we're
supporting. We have Fissinger 1n there. We're supporting the
Contras also. At the same time, we're making three different
major shows of force in there with two carrier task forces, a
battleship task force, and we're going to extend the maneuvers
the president calls routine, but they're not routine, and
evervcne knows that. And so I think we need to define what our
real interests are there and what our real posture is going to
be. It's been very Confusing.
WILL: Senator, last week: the House voted to cut off aid from
the United States, covert aid to the Contras fighting the
regime in Nicaragua. In doing so, they defeated a proposal by
a southern conservative Democrat, Mr. Mica, who said, 'Let's cut
L0,NriUTUED
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200810004-5
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200810004-5
cff aid when Nicaragua cuts Off aid to _l Salvador.' Could you
have supported that ;: in.d of amendment the 'ii ca Amendment?
Oh, I probably could have supported that because I
don't think that the support that we've been giving there in
our efforts to dump the government of Nicaragua. which is
basically what it is, is going to solve the problem there.
Even if all aid _s cut off from J\'1Caraguia int El Salvador. and
C
the :low o arms through there is small right now. In fact, it
neecs a very low flow of arms to really support all the
activity that the guerrillas in `_l Salvador have been making.
You know, there are only about 5,000 to 7.000 of the guerrillas
there now and they need a few boxes of ammo perhaps and some
small flow of arms could actually come by air. So I don't
think that's really the final answer in that area under what at
least our agreements are with the Organization, of the American
States, the Ric Treaty. All have indicated a willingness to
cooperate in that region, not go in and try and dump
governments.
WILL: Senator. I made not have made my question clear. You
then would've supported the amendment that did pass the House
to cut off aid. You would, not have supported the Mica
Lmencme^.t td, make the cut-off cf aid contingent on Nicargua
cutting off its aid. GLENN: No. That's right. I would have
cut off the aid period in that area or cut off the covert
activity in that area. Let me make it clear. Cut off the
covert activity in that area, which I think is counter-
productive to our purposes in that region.
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200810004-5