INFORMATION DISCUSSED WITH CANDIDATE INVOLVED WITH OVER-FLIGHT OF SOVIET BLOC COUNTRIES
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
T
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 30, 2002
Sequence Number:
4
Case Number:
Publication Date:
March 19, 1956
Content Type:
MFR
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4.pdf | 147.21 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 20
ILLEGIB
6IB
tt
EGIB
Approved For Release 2003/02/27 : CIA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4
=t.,'r,flzTI-FIN FOR 'r . i';.' j;cc ar?
1. The candidate was questioned as to his acceptance and understanding
of. ate. conditions outlined in the first interview. An affirmative answer
was given. 6
2. The need for security and restriction of all information given at
.away!` time relative to this project was reiterated.
3.' A hypothetical mission was described involving deep penetrati
n over-r
o
flight of Soviet Bloc countries in single engine equipment superior to any
With which the candidate is now fa .'liar. The purpose behind such a mission
was described as the collection of inteliigenco, possibly slectronically,
his not now available to th Wt Pi
eesernower countres. A discussion
of capture or non-return from mission ensued with the.understanding that the
candidate would at a later ate be more able to evaluate far h3elt the
k
i
s
r
. italyed. .It was stated that all persons concerned in this activity, including
Ai
e
r Force p
rsonnel to whom the propositi hdi nall bed
,ona. orgyen mae had felt
that ` the . risks involved were of reasonable proportion. The candidate was
cured ;that he w.ie not being required to accept or sign a contract at this
w
but
ould have at least two or three more vTsGks in which to consider our
proposition. ,
4.. The term of the contract were outlined
i.e.
General ')ut
statt:e
,
,
y
pay at 9'775 per ta)onth, ape ,~-tic~:,_1 ?s:ty status it '1540 per month, with a
bonus 01
. 1Ca0O per mont', cc ruir:,u ::fi.e; arrivcl at the operational site. The
,ant of the bonus eitx,ea? in total er in p-"i?t ,eould be left largely to th'
jurisdiction of the senior member. of the avers?F 9 unit. It was :further ex- -
plained that this individual wcuLld' ve of a typo similar to the CO's with whom
the candidate h :-%d h ,.d con -La c - . Tho tern-s oil the insurance coverage and leave
.arrangements were e)lained.
With an affirmatip reaction from the ctaiididate
the problem of
,
developing an e.lana.tion for his employment during the period of the contract
w:p briefly explored sold it is the. intention of the parties concerned that
r4zdrewnta
.' The candidate was advised that through he mild bee
o
notifiedf the date, time, and place for physic ti -
or- and, that official
to. It was outlined tb the candidate that" etepe dssigned to examine his
background and :psr#oruU. reputation .gill have to be undertaken and the casid!d-;te
agreed that this irus f.cce?t ogle to him.
0001 nt No.
tea i h nge In Class. ^
Dc ssitied
Ciis`s thangee to: TS C
Next Review Date: - -- -----__--- --
25*1 Fti3 70-3
'lace: -_r''
WHET
Approved For ReleasUMBI2/BQ.: 4IA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4
7 2 o/