LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION WRITTEN BY MR. HELMS TO ROBERT R. MULLEN & COMPANY FOR E. HOWARD HUNT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
00609297
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
March 9, 2023
Document Release Date: 
August 14, 2020
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2016-01299
Publication Date: 
July 20, 1973
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION [15816493].pdf131.63 KB
Body: 
� Approved for Release: 2020/08/14 C00609297 20 July 1973 (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) MEMORANDUM FOR: The Record SUBJECT: Letter of Recommendation Written by Mr. Helms to Robert R. Mullen & Company for E. Howard Hunt 1. Mr. Robert R. Mullen of Robert R. Mullen & Company, Chief, CCS and the undersigned, case officer for the company, met In a park near 2eth & " H " Streets, Northwest, Washington, D.C. on 20 July 1973, at 9:15 AM, to discuss several matters relating to the company's past cooperation with the Agency. 2. recalled our meeting with Mr. Mullen on 20 April 1973 when he informed Mr. Mullen that would be given a meaningful Agency job in upon his return from in June 1973. apologized for his inability to be present in a subsequent meeting 4 June 1973 when the undersigned had to inform Mr. Mullen that the ass ignrilect for aad fallen through and that instead was to be terminated by the Agency. began to explain the reasons for the change in plans and Mr. Mullen (b)(1) Interrupted to say that he completely understood why had to (b)(3) be terminated by the Agency and did not in any way hold responsible for the termination nor did he doubt reracity (b)(1) or integ-rity. Mr. Mullen said that had naturally been (b)(3) disturbed and unhappy because of the termination, but Mi. Mullen had reminded him that he had certain gains from his Agency assir7nment, and particularly mentioned that might still be in (b)(1) working at some unexciting job except for his Agency employment. (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2020/08/14 C00609297 Approved for Release: 2020/08/14 C00609297 3. Mr. Mullen then reported that he has postponed his vacation because of a new business opportunity involving the sale of freight cars worth $135 million to the Yugoslav government. Mullen and Company's commission on this deal if it is consummated will be about $400,000. Mr. Mullen said that he had yestei-day received a telephone call from an official of the Pullman Company, which is to supply the freight cars, reporting that Mr. Stankovitz (phonetic) of the Yugoslav Embassy had contacted the Pullman Company. Mr. Stankovitz had told the Pullman Company official that he had heard rumors that Mullen and Company is involved with the CIA. and that the whole deal would be off if this proved true. .Mr. Mullen wondered whether there might be some leak within the Agency, but agreed with our comment that the Ytgoslays had probably read about Mullen's alleged association with the Agency in TIME Magazine because of Mullen and Company's employment of E. Howard Hunt. 4. at this point mentioned the letter written by Mr. Helms on behalf of Mr. Hunt to Mullen and Company. Mr. Mullen said that Mr. Hunt, in addition to giving Mr. Mullen the above letter of recommenciPtion, had also exhibited a copy of a letter of recommendation by Mr. Helms to -- Mr. Mullen thought -- Allied Chemical Company. 5. Mr. Mullen readily agreed to make a copy of Mr. Helme_ letter of recommerxiation available to the Agency. A letter was not written by Mr. Helms following Mr. Hunt's employment by Mullen and Company. Mr. Mullen recalled that at a function at the Kennedy Center he had seen Mr. Helms. They were nOt able to converse, but Mr. Helmet had winked and given a hand signal to Mr. Mullen which Mr. Mullen interpreted as an approbation of Mullen and Company's hiring of Mi. Hunt. Mr. Mullen explained that his hiring of Mr. Hunt had been a rather natural one as Mr. Mullen knew both Howard and Dorothy Hunt in Paris from about 1948 to 1950 when Mr. Hunt and Mr. Mullen were employed by the Marshall Plan, and Dorothy Hunt-was employed by Mr. Averell Harriman, then in Paris. When then with the Retirement Affairs -Branch, requsted Mr. Mullen's assistance in securing employment for Mr. Hunt, Mr. Mullen had arranged several interviews for Mr. Hunt. Mr. Mullen subsequently decided to have Mullen and Company hire Mr. Hunt because of his excellent writing abilities, and he had proved a splendid addition to the staff prior to the Watergate incident. -2- Approved for Release: 2020/08/14 C00609297 Approved for Release: 2020/08/14 C00609297 � tir�nirT 6. Mr. Mullen advised the undersigned telephonically at 11:45 AM on 20 July 1973 that when he attempted to get Mr. Helms' letter of recommendation concerning Mr. Hum, he had been reminded by his secretary that the entire Mullen & Company file concerning Mr. Hunt had been given to the U.S. Attorney's office by Mr. Robert Dennett of Mullen & Company during the investigation of the Watergate Incident during the Summer and Fall of 1972. Mullen & Company bad mt kept any copies of material in its Howard Hunt file and, consequently, no copy of Mr. Helms' letter is available through Mullen & Company. DC/CCS /CCB Orig DDO 10 OLC 1083 (Hunt) -3- Approved for Release: 2020/08/14 C00609297