COLOMBIA: PARAMILITARIES GAINING STRENGTH
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
00809198
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
21
Document Creation Date:
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date:
July 19, 2018
Sequence Number:
Case Number:
F-2018-01908
Publication Date:
June 13, 1997
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 617.37 KB |
Body:
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
(b)(3)
Intelligence Report
(1
(1 eiK
Office of Asian Pacific and Latin American Analysis
Colombia: Paramilitaries Gaining Strength
13 June 1997
Sponsored by local powerbrokers and fueled by frustration over the military's
inability to control the expansion of guerrilla activity, paramilitary groups are
growing and are likely to continue to expand their membership, capability, and
influence over economically important territory.
� The climate of insecurity in vast areas of Colombia offers the
paramilitaries a ready and lucrative market among wealthy businessmen,
including drug traffickers.
� Although they are no match militarily for the 10,000 to 15,000 full time
guerrillas who operate nationwide, paramilitary groups are a force to be
reckoned with, particularly in northern Colombia.
Paramilitary groups have long been regarded as allies, or in some cases,
surrogates of the military.
Nonetheless, enough data exist to draw the following
conclusions:
� The attitude of most military officers toward these groups appears to be
shaped by their shared interest in fighting the guerrillas, and to this end
officers probably view the paramilitaries as a valuable source of
information about local conditions and insurgent activities.
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
� Instances of direct, high-level military support for paramilitaries
appears to be isolated suggest links exist (b)(1)
between Major General Ivan Ramirez, Commander of the Army's First (b)(3)
Division, and Carlos Castano, Colombia's most notorious paramilitary
leader. (b)(3)
CI:q6
APLA 97-41007
TN: 97-03138
DEA-1, UN. X1
DRV PROM: Multiple Sources
'Secret_
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Possible military military links to these groups are of particular concern because of the
upsurge in human rights violations attributed to paramilitary groups in recent
years.
� Victims of paramilitary violence are most commonly unarmed civilians
who are murdered for suspected ties to the guerrillas.
Amid these ominous trends, President Samper and other top officials have said that
the government is prepared to take firm action against the paramilitaries, but so far
they have not matched their words with deeds.
� Prosecutors have investigated only a fraction of the many serious incident
that have taken place in recent years, and
some outstanding arrest warrants have not been enforced.
� We see scant indications that the military is making an effort to directly
confront the paramilitary groups or to devote additional men or
resources against them in an amount equal to the dimensiOns of the
problem.
The growth of paramilitary violence is likely to complicate US interests in
Colombia in the areas of human rights and counternarcotics.
(b)(6)
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
(b)(3) (b)(6)
(b)(3)
This re ort was prepared by with contributions from and
ffice of Asian Pacific and Latin American Analysis. It responds to a request by a senior State (b)(3)
Department official and was coordinated with INR and DIA. Comments and queries are welcome and In;(b)(6)
the Latin America Regional Issues Manager, APLA,
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
2
"Thttret�
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 000809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
--Secret�
Paramilitaiies Growing, Expanding Activities
Paramilitaries, a term used by many Colombians to refer to bands of armed civilians
paid to protect the interests of various sponsors, are stepping up their activities in
economically important areas of the country. The areas include key agricultural and
cattle ranching areas, as well as mineral extraction regions in the northern and central
parts of the country. (See map).
A former Human Rights Ombudsman claims that paramilitary activity has increased
by 60 percent over the past four years. Frustration over widespread insecurity caused
by the military's inability to curtail the activities of the guerrilla groups--the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and National Liberation Army
(ELN)--probably are fueling the upsurge in activity by these groups
The use of private security forces to compensate for shortcomings in the state's ability
to provide security, especially in the countryside, is not new.1 But in recent years the
seemingly unabated escalation in cases of kidnapping, extortion, theft, and murder by
the guerrillas�who now number between 10,000 and 15,000 full time armed fighters,
according to government estimates�has led growing numbers of local powerbrokers
to sponsor paramilitaries to strike back at guerrillas and their sympathizers. Sponsors
have come to view the weakness�or in some cases absence--of government authority
in rural areas as an opportunity to use violence with impunity to consolidate and
expand their control over territory and licit and illicit economic activity.
The civilian sponsors of paramilitary activity include business owners, such as cattle
ranchers, coffee plantation owners, and emerald miners. In some areas
narcotraffickers, who, like other wealthy Colombians have been targets of guerrilla
extortion and other crimes, have largely displaced legitimate landowners and are
using paramilitaries to intimidate and eliminate guerrillas and others who interfere
with trafficker business.2 Paramilitaries sometimes do more for traffickers than
Landowners, businessmen, and other wealthy patrons have long relied on private security
forces to protect their lives and interests. In the 1960s, the military, facing a vast and �
geographically compartmented terrain with inadequate manpower and transportation, created
paramilitary groups to assist them in confronting guerrilla activity in isolated parts of the
country. In 1989, however, the Supreme Court struck down the statute legalizing paramilitary
groups.
2 Despite clashing with guerrillas in some areas in northern and central Colombia,
narcotraffickers enjoy well established and mutually profitable relations with guerrillas in coca
and opium poppy growing areas. There, guerrillas provide security for illicit crop growing
areas, clandestine laboratories, and airstrips.
3
e e F
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
�Secret
�
protect against guerrillas; they are used by traffickers to force owners and squatters
off land.
�
a well-known paramilitary group
protects the Gaitan Sendales narcotrafficking operations
the presence of large landholdings, particularly those
owned by narcotraffickers, appears to be the strongest indicator of paramilitarism.
Areas with vigorous economic activity, such as cattle ranching, emerald mining, or oil
production are magnets for both guerrillas and paramilitaries. As guerrillas target
areas of high economic activity for extortion of "war taxes," so do business people in
these areas hire paramilitaries to protect their interests against the guerrillas.
4
-Secret
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
--Sec-get-
5
Approved for for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Stet ct
Paramilitaries Seeking Unity
A growing body of reporting suggests that Castano and other key paramilitary leaders
have been trying to join forces under an umbrella group in an effort to portray
themselves as a legitimate force in their own right, rather than bands of vigilantes and
surrogates of the military, as the guerrillas charge. Following a national conference in
Uraba attended by some 150 activists in mid-April, the largest paramilitary groups
announced that they were forming a national, unified coordinating committee known
as United Self-Defense Groups of Colombia (AUC). The leaders of these groups
appear to be motivated by a desire to position themselves for a place at the table if and
when peace negotiations occur between the government and the guerrillas. Improved
coordination also affords the possibility of creating better networks for obtaining arms
and sharing training expertise.
It seems unlikely however, that this new structure will have a significant impact on
.the paramilitaries' day-to-day operations. The groups have admitted that their various
regional commanders will retain independent responsibility for their respective
military actions.
� Personal rivalries between Castano and Carranza thwarted previous efforts
at unity, but the two have put aside their differences in order to pool
resources and field a more competent combat force against the guerrillas,
according to a foreign government service official.
Top paramilitary leaders also have tried to build support among the groups for a
unified agenda, according to a document purporting to be a communique issued by
paramilitary groups following a summit in November 1996. According to the
communique, the top priority is to expel the guerrillas from broad swaths of land in
the coffee growing areas (Antioquia, Risaralda, and Caldas Departments) and other
key economic zones in the northern half of the country.
� Other priorities are to increase intelligence activities in urban areas,
especially in big cities such as Bogota, Medellin, and Cartagena, and to
establish influence in Putumayo Department along the southern border
with Ecuador and Peru, where the paramilitaries say they fear the
guerrillas have set up a virtual parallel government.
6
Approved for for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
�Secret.
The paramilitaries may be coordinating plans to violently disrupt the coining state and
local elections scheduled for 26 October. The AUC asserted in late April that it will
stop leftist politicians from campaigning in areas under their control, a threat similar
to that of FARC, which indicated that it would stop campaigning in its areas of
influence, according to press reports. Presumably, however, the FARC will allow
politicians who are sympathetic to their cause to campaign.
Murky Ties Between the Military and Pararnilitaries
Historic links between the military�especially the Army, which is the largest service
and the one that bears the brunt of the battle against the guerrillas�and paramilitary
groups are well known and publicly acknowledged by the government, but the nature
of the contemporary relationship is more difficult to ascertain.
Although paramilitaries were declared illegal in 1989, some members have continued
their ties to these groups
Many military officers have been embarrassed by several high profile, rebel-inflicted
setbacks over the past year, and some who are demoralized by the military's inability
to make headway against the guerrillas may see tolerance or support for the
pararnilitaries as one avenue for striking back. These officers tend to blame the
military's shortcomings on the government's failure to adequately support the armed
forces. Such views have been indirectly, but unmistakably articulated by Military
Forces Commander Harold Bedoya, who frequently bemoans the military's manpower
shortage and the judiciary's lax policies on prosecuting guen-illas.3
� Bedoya complained late last year that the country needs to triple its Army
to least 360,000 soldiers to adequately counter the guerrilla threat. To
compensate for the deficiency, in early April Bedoya proposed creating a
civilian militia, but the idea has little political support.
� He has also publicly criticized judicial authorities for releasing thousands
of guerrillas over the past several years whom the military had captured
and turned over to the courts for prosecution.4
4 Prosecutors claim they have no choice but to release the insurgents because the military
failed to provide admissible evidence or even positive identification of some of the guerrillas,
7
"Seevet
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
8
�Seer-et_
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
9
�Secret_
(b)(
(b)(
(b)(
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
�6jeer-et.
Military expertise may be shared and ties reinforced when former military personnel
join paramilitaries.
�
�
there are credible allegations that some
active-duty service members of the security forces "moonlight" as
paramilitaries.
It is difficult to corroborate the sketchy information available on the cooperation at
the local level and the extent to which top military officers are aware of such ties and
approve of them. In theory, government-sponsored rural security cooperatives known
as "Convivirs" are the military's "eyes and ears" in remote parts of the country, but in
practice some local commanders reportedly also rely on the paramilitaries for
information on guerrilla activities.
�
in October that at the local level, troop
commanders often consult with paramilitaries to obtain information about
guerrilla activity taking place in their area of operations.
Nevertheless as the larger paramilitary groups gain
strength, some of the leaders appear to want to distance themselves from the popular
perception that they work closely with the military--at least in their public statements
--in order to foster the image of powerful, independent actors.
10
""Aeevet
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
er-st�
� Despite reporting linking him with Ramirez
Castano and othei readers like him appear to have "outgrown" the military
and act with increasing independence.
Growing Human Rights Abuses
As paramilitaries have grown and intensified their activities, so too have the number
of human rights abuses attributed to these groups. Victims of paramilitary violence
are mostly unarmed, noncombatant civilians who are murdered for suspected ties to
the guerrillas, according to a variety of sources. In some departments, paramilitaries
carry out selective assassinations, while in other areas, particularly in northern
Colombia, paramilitaries are suspected of carrying out numerous massacres of
suspected leftist sympathizers.
�
redible, local nongovernmental organization
sources say that more than half of politically motivated extrajudicial
killings were committed by paramilitaries in 1996, more than triple the
level attributed to them in 1993.5
� Colombian human rights prosecutors blame paramilitaries for the majority
of massacres in ate-a8 siith as Uraba, Cordoba, Magdelena Medio, and the
Eastern plains,
In addition, paramilitary operations have exacerbated the already serious problem of
internal displacement caused by the long-running insurgency. A recent government
report indicated that paramilitary attacks are now the primary cause of the rising
number of internal refugees, findings that are consistent with those in a study carried
out by two human rights groups
�
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
The study found that more than 180,000 Colombians were displaced by
violence in 1996; it blamed paramilitary groups for 33 percent of the
forced migration and guerrillas for 29 percent of the displacement,
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
� In April this problem gained international attention when several hundred
refugees crossed the border into Panama to escape clashes involving
5 The report also noted that the number of human rights violations attributed to state security
forces has decreased significantly since 1993. At the same time, violations attributed to
guerrilla groups have risen steadily.
6 According to the UN, the total number of displaced Colombians is now over 750,000.
11
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
-Setret-
paramilitaries, guerrillas, and the Colombian Army. Paramilitaries
allegedly pursued the refugees, some of whom they apparently believed to
be guerrilla sympathizers, into Panama, where they killed five people,
according to various press reports.
Paramilitaries also add--albeit on a relatively small scale--to Colombia's kidnapping
statistics. In an effort to seek revenge and pressure the guerrillas to release the
hostages they hold, paramilitary leaders periodically kidnap collaborators,
sympathizers, and relatives of the guerrilla leadership.
� Colombia suffers from the highest rate of kidnapping in the world; about
half of the approximately 1,400 kidnappings reported in 1996 were
perpetrated by guerrillas, and the other half were committed by common
criminals.
Bogota Has Done Little to Stem the Tide
Amid growing turmoil, particularly in northern Colombia, President Samper and other
top officials have uttered strong pronouncements in recent months claiming that the
government was prepared to take firm action against paramilitary groups. Thus far,
however, the administration has not matched its words with deeds.
� In a surprisingly candid admission, the government conceded in a recent
report that it has been slow to perceive the gravity of the paramilitary
problem and in mobilizing resources to confront it.
A team of prosecutors who specialize in investigating human rights abuses has been
pursuing cases against numerous paramilitary leaders and activists, but the problem
has grown so large that they are only able to address a fraction of the many serious
incidents that take place each day. 7
� Last year, the team addressed approximately 100 cases involving
massacres, kidnappings, forced disappearances and extrajudicial killings
by paramilitaries, guerrillas, members of the security forces, and others,
As a result of these efforts and those of the police, several important paramilitary
commanders and lower level members have been arrested, but many other arrest
warrants, some many years old, have not been enforced,
7 Local human rights advocates are likely to receive a boost when a recently established
United Nations Human Rights commission local office becomes fully operational. The office
will be headquartered in Bogota but its staff is expected to travel widely in Colombia.
12
�Srepet_
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
� On 25 April police arrested Luis Alfredo Rubio Rojas, who was charged
with paramilitarism and participation in a massacre in 1989, among other
crimes.
� In January, Jose Anibal Rodriguez Urquijo, a member of Castano's
Peasant Self-Defense Groups of Corboda and Uraba, was sentenced to 40
years in jail for the kidnapping and murder of a senator and the massacre
of 43 peasants in 1989.
Efforts to prosecute members of the military who have allegedly assisted these groups
have been stymied. Prosecutors reportedly are concerned that all cases involving
military assistance to paramilitaries will be turned over to military courts, which have
traditionally been far more lenient on such matters. This action deprives civilian
officials of an important deterrent in preventing security forces from becoming
involved with paramilitaries.
� A precedent may have been set last year when a judicial council ruled that
the case against Farouk Yanine--a retired three star general charged with
collaborating with paramilitary groups in the Magdalena Media region
during the 1980s and "intellectual authorship" of two massacres--could
only be tried in a military court.
�
was unaware of a single case in
which a military court had prosecuted and sentenced a senior officer for
human rights violations.
More importantly, we see scant indication that the military leadership is making an
effort to directly confront the paramilitary groups or to devote men or resources to
stop their activities in an amount commensurate with the dimensions of the problem.
� Even as then Defense Minister Esguerra was announcing a new initiative
against paramilitary groups last December, Bedoya said leftist guerrillas
and narcotics traffickers would continue to be public-enemy number one,
according to press reports.
13
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Prospects Dim for Reining in Paramilitaries
Barring a significant improvement in Bogota's capability to impose security in the
Colombian countryside--which we believe is unlikely before the end of Samper's
term in August 1998--paramilitary groups will continue to expand in membership,
capability, and influence over economically important territory. Paramilitaries are,
however, a long way from parity with the guerrillas in terms of unity of purpose,
number of combatants, training, and equipment, and are unlikely to be able to match
them for many years. But as paramilitaries become stronger, they are increasingly
likely to engage in direct clashes with the guerrillas�as they do now in parts of
northern Colombia---and to try to extend their operations into areas long controlled by
the insurgents.
Efforts by key paramilitary leaders to create a formal, consolidated network are likely
to meet with only limited success. In view of longstanding personal rivalries, these
groups are more likely to operate as a loose confederation, rather than a unified
command element. Smaller paramilitary groups will continue to function as "guns for
hire," engaging in ever changing alliances of convenience.
As the frequency and intensity of violent confrontations between the paramilitaries
and guerrillas grow, civilians will increasingly be caught in the crossfire. Local
politicians, particularly in remote areas, will be vulnerable to intimidation by both
sides, further weakening the already tenuous government control in some areas. This
trend is likely to result in particularly bloody elections for state and local offices, even
by Colombian standards.
� Concern about violence in the runup to elections could prompt Bogota to
try to crack down on paramilitaries in coming months, and perhaps even
arrest one of the high profile paramilitary leaders. As the new UN human
rights office in Bogota becomes more active, it is likely to join with other
domestic and international groups in pressing the government for action.
The military is likely to react coolly to added calls by civilians for a crackdown on
paramilitaries. The deficiencies in manpower, transport, and tactics that propels some
14
�Strret.
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
�Secret�
members of the security forces to work with paramilitaries is unlikely to change over
the next year. The popular perception that the military is "losing the war" against the
guerrillas is likely to continue to tempt some officers to pursue all avenues possible to
strike back at the guerrillas. As a result, informational links and instances of active
coordination between military and paramilitaries are likely to continue
Implications for the United States
Thus far, paramilitary groups have refrained from attacking US citizens and facilities.
Nonetheless, Americans, particularly those working in remote areas in northern
Colombia, are at risk of becoming unintended victims of paramilitary attacks. The
paramilitaries' victimization of growing numbers of innocent civilians runs counter to
US interests in preventing human rights abuses in Colombia.
� Washington's pressure on the Samper government could serve as an
impetus for a crackdown on the paramilitaries.
In addition, powerful paramilitary group leaders' involvement in or links with
narcotics trafficking could pose an increasingly potent challenge to US antinarcotics
interests. Just as paramilitaries have been directed against guerrillas who threaten
trafficker interests, these groups could also be directed against US aided eradication
activities and other counternarcotics efforts.
15
--Seer-et_
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
�Seefet_
Convivirs: Civilian Assistance for the Embattled Army
The Colombian Government authorized the formation of Convivirs in November
1995 to aid the military in counterinsurgency operations by empowering civilians to
gather information about guerrilla activities in rural areas and pass it to local
commanders. 8 Estimates of the number of Convivirs in operation vary; press and US
Embassy sources say that 400-500 Convivirs have been formed as of April
The majority
operate in central and northern Colombia.
� Each group consists of up to 30 people, including a leader who is selected by the
local Army commander. The Convivir is given a two-year charter, but the
government is free to revoke the license of the group and demand the return of
any equipment issued to it at any time.
Attitudes toward the creation and expansion of Convivirs are mixed. Many political
leaders, wealthy rural landowners, and the military strongly support these groups, but
others, particularly in the human rights community, fear that Convivirs will take on an
offensive role and become, in effect, a government-sponsored paramilitary.
� The governor of Antioquia Department extols the services provided by the
groups, and a top Army commander recently praised their "invaluable service."
� Concerns of critics and supporters alike, however, were raised by reports last
month that the government's Superintendency of Vigilance and Private Security
provided unauthorized weapons to about 60 Convivir groups, raising fears that
some of these weapons might be diverted to paramilitaries or other illegal
groups.
Instances of guerrilla violence directed against Convivir members suggests that the
rebels perceive them as a threat.
� For example, four Convivir headquarters were attacked and at least two members
killed in 1997, according to press reports.
8 The official name of these groups is Rural Cooperatives of Vigilance and Security.
Convivir means 'living together' in Spanish.
16
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Operating Areas of Major Colombian Paramilitary Groups, May 1997
(Z) Uraba region
Magdalena Medio region
Caribbean Sea
--4ANA_VA
�
Atlanticol
9
Sucre
Cordoba
� 8
Antioquia
North
Pacific
Ocean
Narino
Risaralda
del
Cauca
Cauca
Putumayo
10
ECUADOR
Caldas
Tolima
0 500 . 200 Kllomators
100 200 Miles
Magdalena
Boliv
La
�/Guajira
Norte de
Santander
6
Santander
Boyaca
Cundinamarca 2
Bogot
Distrito
Capital
Caqueta
PERU
1 Self-defense groups of Cordoba and Uraba
2 Victor Carranza's organization
3 Self-defense groups of Magdalena Medio
4 "La Mencenta" group
5 "Rodriguez Gacha" group
6 Self-defense groups of Bajo Rionegro
7 Self-defense groups of Cesar
8 Self-defense groups of Valencia
9 Self-defense groups of Sucre
10 "Los Masetos" organization
Casanare
Guaviare
Vaupes
Amazonas
VENEZUELA
Vichada
Guainia
BRAZIL
Boundary representation is
not necessarily authoritative.
Secret NOFORN
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Colombia: Paramilitaries Gaining Strength
External Distribution:
mre.t.-
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Colombia: Paramilitaries Gaining Strength
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Colombia: Paramilitaries Gaining Strength
--s4r,ege,t_s..
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198
�"Sire'tot
Colombia: Paramilitaries Gaining Strength
See
Approved for Release: 2018/07/17 C00809198