THE CIA AND ALLENDE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
01430482
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date: 
August 7, 2017
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2007-00094
Publication Date: 
April 12, 1973
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon the cia and allende[15132312].pdf81.94 KB
Body: 
'1r -Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C014304820 BALTIMGFIE AMERICAN 12 APR 1973 � . � JOEIN. p. P:OCPIE r4.-zt t. � he CIA and Aie, de The current imbroglio over the, role that' the Central Intell:geoce Agency arid7the ternational Telephone and Telegrap.h Co. played (or considered playing) in trying to block the, election of Chilean President lende :h.as. its tantalizir,.g and perplexing as- pects'..'as the CIA's cash balance so low it needed .a :11 Wirth dollars from ITR�T?�Did the. CIA and ITR�T really. think they could pull off some of the stunts contemplated without, the word getting out and working.massively- in favor, of Allende? But underlying this. brawl are a series of very difficult question of principle, to say nothing of definition. First of all', ..what constitutes� American-, (public or priyate) intervention in the.inter-- nal affairs ,of another .slate?; Obviously,. sponsoring a- revolution (as Teddy :Roosevelt' did to break. Panama loose ft-OM Colombia).* is at one pole. But betv.-eerpsponsoring revo- lutions and totally eliminating any Ameri- can activity outside of the United States,' _there is .a long line on the spectrum, a line that gets fu47:ier and fuizier -the further: you ...� : " �� � � go. Moreover, even doing nothing Can be Con:.: strued as: intervention: .Egypt's' -President Nasser throught .that Secretary-Dulles' refusal to help financesthe Aswan Darn was a - form of intervention, and some years "ago � six confee-producing nations in Latin Amen-' ca.protested to the Organization. of Ameri-. can States that our refusal to .rig 'coffee prices intervened in their infernal affairs. I would argue that the very existence or the United States as the most powerful' n.a:: lion in the world automatically intervenes in the affairs of every other state. Nasser and the coffee producers were right: Inaction on our part can have as great art impact as ac- tion. To take a vivid instance, if we had not shipped military equipment to Britain be- fore Pearl Harbor, the war for Europe could � ;have been lost. If we accept that�propoSition. the futile 'argument over whether we should intervene automatically goes by the boards. Then we ;turn to the hard one: To what ends should 'we (publicly and privately) intervene? Shout� we protect democratic. (or even un- democratic) nations from totalitarian inva- Sion or subversion? Should we utilize our:- . foreign aid to nourish democratic political , � development as is provided in the. Fraser - .� Amendment ,to- the foreign aid -bill � or � should .we 'take a.strictly .hands-off ap- proach? � It. as at this 'point that the 11.8�T fracas � ...comes .back _into focus, and as ileological . . shambles' occurs. Let us suppose for a .rno- ,',� ..ment that the Chase Manhattan Bank, influ- _. � enced by the World Council of Churches and � black militants, decided to provide a conduit � - to black7liberation movements in South Afri- ca, using�its-.business connections to provide � arms 'and other aid to the revolutionaries. . -.Would this .be. a- "bad" thing? Was it a "bad" thing when the CIA, using a business �� .cover, sliipped.. into Santo � Dorning_o the� � wea_pons used to kill the brutal dictator fru- ' Cl don't know howhe feels about it to- day, out in �190-Ftne Dominican statesman ":Juan Bosch thought that intervention was the- -thing since the discovery of America.). � � - � , What this comes down to is that interven- � tion is a "good" thing when you happen .to faVor the cause involved, but is wicked and 'immoral.. if you disapprove,of the goals. K. � � "perfettly.hum.an response; but hardly one, on �� which sound public policy can be foimulat- ed.The though, of .ITR-T losing its Chilean . assets does-not bring tears to my eyes or . lead me to, wish we still had a supply of gun- boats in stock. Capitalism. I'm told, involves .. taking risks, and the corporation may in the : end be reimbursed by a federal agency set up to provide insurance for 'such contingen- cies. No, what bothers me is the wholly ad hoe reaction of the Senate committee investigat- ing the matter. We' would be far better' served by Sen. Church and his colleagues if they spent less time being outraged and a little � more trying to formulate general guidelines, guidelines which would apply to South America and South Africa. to the just �and the unjust alike, however defined. ' Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430482 00465