MEETING WITH MR. WILLIAM MCAFEE, DDC/INR DEPARTMENT OF STATE ON 6 FEBRUARY 1974

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
01474416
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date: 
August 7, 2017
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2007-00094
Publication Date: 
February 11, 1974
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon meeting with mr. william [15132254].pdf219.08 KB
Body: 
FIE) Approved for Release: 2017/01/18�001474416 INTERNAL Li AFIDENTI AL USE ONLY rouavonce.rwzra wmawaramoonsaan ROViTiNG AND RECORD SKEET _(D)(3) SUBJECT: (Optional) Meeting with Mr. Bill McAfee (State) FROM: -;i EXTENSION NO. DATE 19 7 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) � DATE RECEIVED FORWARDED OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) Mr. Colby DCI � t'D r�-�� � 8. 1 10. 12. 13. 14. FORM 3-62 tal 1 Bill, Attached is friy Memo for the Record of my discussion with Bill McAfee which I briefly reported to you on 6.February 1974. I think you would be particularly interested in the following paragraphs: 4-6: 10-15: THIRD COUNTRY (b)(3) EFFORT 16: DEPARTMENT OF STATE COMPLAINTS 19:- RE-WRITE OF ROGER CHANNEL AIRGRAM 6693 which was meant to be the substitute for the Presidential letter that you had proposed. USE I,REVIOuS INTERNAL n CONFIDENTIAL 11 nmiv [(b)(3) IMCLASS, El ED (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Ii February 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting with Mr. William McAfee, DDC/INR Department of State on 6 February 1974 ROBERT R. MULLEN COMPANY 1. On 6 February 1974 I visited Mr. William McAfee, DDC/INR, to brief him of our use of the Robert R. Mullen Company for Initially this meeting was scheduled for the afternoon o eoruary '74. Mr. McAfee had to Cancel this date. I was not available the next day. By the time we met, CBS had broadcast our cover involvement with the Mullen Company via TV in the evening of 5 February and in an expanded version via radio on 6 February 1974. cover 2. I told Mr. McAfee that we had one officer under Mullen and another officer \ I said these officers had beet engaged in operational activities which were compatible with our understanding with the respective host intelligence services, but that the latter had not been informed of their presence. I added that toward the end of the previous week, we had become aware of the possibility of the public revelation of our cover relationship with the Mullen Company. We, therefore* instructed to brief their Ambassadors and with their concurrence, the chiefs of the liaison services. This was done on 2 February 1974, and on the same day, briefed Acting Assistant Secretary of State Hummel. then informed Assistant Secretary Hartman on 4 February. I said that as of the time of our meeting, we had no indications that the publicity would result in difficulties by thc but I stressed that the reaction of was never predicted. (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(3) (b)(3) _(b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 3. Mr. McAfee expressed his particular disappointment of not having been briefed on 2 February 1974. He said that he had been in the office as Duty Officer. This would have put him in a position to handle the inquiry by Deputy Assistant Secretary Wells Stabler on 5 February 1974. Mr. Stabler is the Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of European Affairs responsible for the Low Countries. I let this observation pass without comment. Mr. McAfee then asked me for the names of the 2 fficers. I replied that as long as their names had not been ma e p lic, I preferred not to do so. (b)(3) -2- E(b)(1) (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 (b)(1) (b)(3) ASSISTANT SECRETARY KUBISCH LETTER TO AMBASSADORS IN THE WH AREA 7. While arranging the meeting with Mr. -McAfee the previous afternoon by telephone, he asked me whether I had seen the drafi letter to ambassadors by Assistant Secretary Kubisch. I said I had, and that it presented problems. Mr. McAfee said that Mr. Kubisch was anxious to get it out. I suggested we discuss it during the meeting and informed (b)(3) 8. Mr. McAfee asked Mr. James Gardner to join us. The latter opened the meeting by stressing the urgency to get an agreed draft. I said this could be achieved if Mr. Kubisch would accept that CIA will not participate in the CASP exercise, and that discussion of CIA personnel and activities would be on a bilateral basis between the Department and CIA. I added that we had no problem with doing this at the time of, but outside of the actual CASP review. Messrs. McAfee and Gardner agreed that CIA affairs should not be discussed in front of other participants in the CASP review. Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 (b)(1) (b)(3) -4- Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 kr;-tr.1 I L Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 (b)(1) (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 (b)(1) (b)(3) -6- Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 DEPARTMENT OF STATE COMPLAINTS 16. Mr. McAfee then took his turn of getting some complaints off his chest. It consisted of two items: -0: a. CIA's Use of the PFIAB � , (b)(1) (b)(3) �SLIP Wlaen Room NO. joined us to discuss the Kubisch draft of all Watergate rr.......- said t s re Mr. Co The a.ttached (=YCI -N-.1 expins wh.at is ( of vol:u.rnes. In. a� complete set is IG. FROM 01C BUILD1 FORM " 241 FEB 55 vjviiC REPLW Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416 (b)(1) (b)(3) RE-WRITE OF ROGER CHANNEL CIRCULAR AIRGRAM 6693 19. 1 asked about the status of the re-write of Roger Channel Circular Airgram 6693 of 17 December 1969. He said it was with the Secretary of State. Mr. McAfee had previously told me of a number of re-drafts, one of which finally went to Deputy Secretary Rush. He had it re-done again, but INR took exception to the elimination of an unidentified paragraph. The. last version and 'NW s dissent were sent to Secretary Kissinger where Mr. McAfee believes it will rest for a good long while. COMMENT 20. This frank and rather extensive exchange of views was carried on in a very friendly atmosphere as an exposition of the respective points of view and" heartburns " in the hope that it may assist in resolving some long-standing issues. �DCI DT.30 .ADDO C/AF, C/NE, C/SB (Paras. 4-6; 10-15) Cr,VH (Paras.4 -6; 7-9; 10-15) CFA, C/EUR (Paras. 1-6, 10-15) Chrono -8- (b)(3) (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416