LACUNAE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
01481955
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date: 
August 7, 2017
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2007-00094
Publication Date: 
May 7, 1975
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon lacunae[15132617].pdf71.57 KB
Body: 
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01481954 (b)(3) (b)(6) 7 May 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Administration General Counsel SUBJECT Lacunae 1. In the course of the Director's depositions given to the Rockefeller Commission Staff and of his testimony to the Commission itself, there emerged several issues that would seem to require action. (Some of these issues have been discussed at Morning Meetings; the purpose of this memo is to make them part of the record.) 2. Some of our surveillance and investigations indicate that over the years we have used more than one channel to obtain advice and data from the Internal Revenue Service. OGC and the Office of Security have each(and separately) been involved. The law permits any Agency head, with proper justification, to seek IRS assistance on request to the Secretary of Treasury or the Head of IRS. It would seem appropriate to develop an agreed procedure for handling this within the Agency. A single channel, operating with specific approval of the Director in each case, may be the best bet. As a suggestion, how about a directive, signed by the Director, that lays on the pro- cedure? 3. A Presidential directive of 1965 prevents wiretaps in National Security cases unless approved by the Attorney General. We have no set procedure to govern instances wherein we may want to seek such approval. Presumably, the request would be forwarded to the Director for his approval and for his discussion with the Attorney General. Assuming the Office of Security or DDO would initiate such requests, shouldn't we be clear on the procedure? For example, should OGC and perhaps the IG, chop on each request en route to the DCI? Once again, either way, a DCI directive would seem to be the best way to lay on the procedure. SECR SENSITIVE Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01481955 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01481955 4. The Director has been asked why his 8/29/73 and 6/74 directives have not been incorporated in Agency regulations. He responded by saying many should and would be; some may not be appropriate for regulations. I am sure he would accept DDA determinations either way. E. H. Knoche Assistant to the Director, CIA cc: Inspector General Chairman, CIA Management Committee Mr. Ben Evans %Map -2- SECR T SENSITIVE Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01481955 J