LETTER TO HOWARD H. BAKER FROM W.E. COLBY RE CONGRESSMAN NEDZI'S COMMENTS IN THE WASHINGTON POST

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
01474404
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date: 
August 7, 2017
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2007-00094
Publication Date: 
February 23, 1974
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon letter to howard h. baker[15132099].pdf145.77 KB
Body: 
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474404 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 (b)(3) 23 February 1974 Honorable Howard H. Baker United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Baker: In your letter, of February 22 you refer to Congressman Nedzi's comments in the Washington Post of February 22. I believe that Mr. Nedzi refers there to the same records and information which we have provided to you, plus the extensive hearings he conducted on this overall subject, with one supplementary item. You will recall that I showed you our log of the room tapes with some hand written notes of our initial ideas as to who the "guests" mentioned therein might be. When I showed you these we were in the course of trying to reconstruct who these guests might be from old calendars, notes, etc. After I showed this initial effort to you, we continued this process and produced what we think is the best account we can reconstruct in this way. We showed this final version to Mr. Nedzi and I would be quite happy to show it to you. The main point is that it contains no additional names which relate to "Watergate". Most of the names are either foreign intelligence officials or individuals within the United States Government or private individuals concerned with foreign intelligence matters or other CIA business. The fact of CIA's relationship with some of the foreign intelligence personalities is quite sensitive from their point of view, so I would not like this reconstructed log to leave our hands, but as I said above I would be happy to show it to you on a classified basis at any time you would desire. I think you will find that it does not contribute anything significant to your investigation. Sincerely, E. Colby Director Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474404 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474404 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 23 February 1974 Honorable Howard H. Baker United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510 Dear Senator Baker: In your letter of February 22 you referred to the fact that I reported to you that Mr. Woodward of the Washington Post apparently had a copy of Mr. Thompson's memorandum to you. N\ Your understanding understanding of my comments is accurate. Mr. Bernstein of the Post early on February 21 called to ask me some questions. I was not able to reply to his call until later in the afternoon, when I was told that Mr. Woodward was handling his calls. I thus spoke to Mr. Woodward who indicated that he had a copy of Mr. Thompson's memorandum and proceeded to interrogate me on it, with copious quotes of its language. Since I had a copy of it, thanks to your letter, I am sure that he was actually reading from a copy of it. He made no reference to your covering letter to me, which caused me to surmise that he did not have a copy of that. I have no idea of how Mr. Woodward might have obtained a copy of the memorandum. I did not inform Mr. Woodward that I also had a copy of the Thompson memorandum but I'did indicate familiarity with the questions he was asking, stating that you had been in contact with me about a number of matters including these. My explanation was that you had posed a number of questions in your continuing investigation, that we were answering them and that I did not see any issue between us. I did refer to the fact that I have certain inhibitions on how much of our sensitive material I could allow to leave the Agency's control but said that I have every intention to display to you any- thing we have in any way relating to your Committee's investigation. Sincerely, W. E. Colby Director Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474404 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474404 � SAM J. ERVIN, JR., N.C., CHAIRI. rIOWARD H. BAKER, JR., TENN. VICE C AN HERMAN E. TALMADGE, GA. EDWARD J. GURNEY. FLA. DANIEL K. INOUYE, HAWAII LOWELL P. WEICKER, JR., CONN. JOSEPH M. MFINTOYA, N. MEX. SAMUEL DASH CHIEF COUNSEL AND STAFF DIRECTOR FRED D. THOMPSON MINORITY COUNSEL RUFUS L. EDMISTEN DEPUTY COUNSEL February 22, 1974 Honorable William E. Colby Director Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D. C. 20505 Dear Bill: 9,1Cnifeb ZiEctifez Zenafe SMXOTCOMMITTEEON PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES (PURSUANT TO S. RES. 60, 03D CONGRESS) WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510 A February 22 issue of The Washington Post carries a story by Laurence Stern quoting Representative Lucien Nedzi as concluding that no Watergate-related or presidential conversations were destroyed by the CIA in a "major house-cleaning of tape record- ings in January, 1973." Nedzi is quoted as basing his judgment on a voluminous report, including logs, notes and memoranda, delivered to him yesterday by the CIA. Of course you have very kindly supplied me with certain records of room tapes, telephone tapes, appointment records, and so forth. In some cases the parties to the conversations are identified; in many they are not. In no case, as I recall, is the subject matter identified. Are the records to which Nedzi referred in the Post the same records which you supplied to me? Has Nedzi been supplied with records beyond those? If so, I respectfully request them as soon as possible. If there is interviews, destruction like--which White House as well. any other information beyond records--for instance, oral conversations and the like relating to the of tapes, transcripts of tapes, memoranda or the might have to do with Watergate personalities or conversations relating to Watergate, I want that I appreciate your cooperation and I from you. k - 3 Yours very truly, look forward to hearing HHBJr:d1 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474404