CURRENT INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN - 1956/12/05

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
03003001
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
October 25, 2019
Document Release Date: 
October 31, 2019
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 5, 1956
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CURRENT INTELLIGENCE BULL[15742083].pdf202.15 KB
Body: 
for ft*W"ed Release: 19/10/23 W/1 ArOffir4 5 December 1956 Copy No. % 112 � 3.3(h)(2) / 4 CURRENT 3.5(c) 'oAx INTELLIGENCE ss c �HANGeDT ' Ts / / / 0 cOLADEC.LASSIFIED NEXT REVIEW DATE: ._ AUTH: H BULLETIN OFFICE / OFFICE OF CURRENT INTELLIGENCE ' DATE: REVIEWER: / g CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY o 1 0 $ $ / j4 TOS .#�/ P Approved for Release: 2019/10/23C 0W3003001 /d rr/: 7. /1.04 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 vi ts.E. CONTENTS 1. NEHRU'S PLANS FOR WASHINGTON TALKS (page 3). 2. EGYPT FORESEES NEW WESTERN PLAN TO CREATE A MOSLEM BLOC (page 4). 3. DAMASCUS REQUESTS SOVIET STATEMENT ON SYRIA (page 5). 4. SOVIET-RUMANIAN COMMUNIQUE 5 Dec 56 page 6). Current Intelligence Bulletin Page 2 TOP 'CRET Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 6t. FOR WASHINGTON TALKS the Indian prime minister in his discus- sions in Washington will stress his desire to build a close partnership with the United States, at the same time reiterating that India will not change its policy of friendship toward the USSR and Communist China. Nehru reportedly wants to discuss the Middle East, with emphasis on the future roles there of the United States and India; Communist China; and military pacts, especially Baghdad and SEATO. He will express his concern over the rapid Pakistani build-up with American aid. Although Nehru reportedly will not ask for long-range economic aid, he hopes the desired "partnership" would assure major American assistance for Indian develop- ment projects. Comment Nehru's concern over Hungary may result in some discussion of Soviet tactics and ambitions. He is also deeply interested in promoting inter- national controls over nuclear weapons. 5 Dec 56 Current Intelligence Bulletin :Page .3 SECIET Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 ur *Forl 2. EGYPT FORESEES NEW WESTERN PLAN TO CREATE A TuffIQ T V11/1 11T nr Egypt suspects that the United States is the prime mover in a plan to create a Moslem bloc an Egyptian analysis apparently made by Ali Sabri, Nases adviser, said the United States assumes British leadership in the Middle East is damaged beyond repair and that it feels it is the only country which can take up Britain's role. The instruments of American policy are said to be Pakistan and Lebanon, and King Saud of Saudi Arabia is described as the "crucial figure" who is being tempted by the "baits" of leadership of the bloc and of a favorable Buraimi settlement. Nasr has written Saud warn- ing him of the "intrigue afoot," and the Egyptians hope and expect that Saud will remain steadfastly with Egypt and thus frustrate the Western plan. Comment This report, indicating continuing Egyp- tian suspicion of the United States as a member of the Western alliance, is probably a more accu- rate reflection of the attitude of the Nasr regime than are reports that Nasr intends to move closer to the US. 5 Dec 56 Current Intelligence Bulletin Page 4 TOP S RET Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 I UP 5 .1-(E 1 3. nAmAsmrs TTRaTTESTS SOVIET STATEMENT ON SYRIA Soviet Union to issue a statement on "the serious sit- uation resulting from the concentrated attack on Syria and from the aggressive intentions of Britain, France, Israel, and the Baghdad pact nations P The minis- try suggested that such a statement at that time would be especially opportune since the foreign ministers of France, Britain, and Turkey were in London, and since the United States had issued a statement warning against any aggres- sion on the Baghdad pact nations. Comment Syrian leftists were urging the government to conclude a mutual assistance treaty with the USSR. This Syrian appeal testifies further to the genuineness of Syrian fears of foreign intervention. Moscow is continuing to encourage the Syrians both privately and publicly to stand firm against the West and the Baghdad pact powers. Foreign Minister Shepi- loy referred in Copenhagen on 28 November to the threat to Syria and other Middle East states, and Moscow is maintain- ing a continuous propaganda barrage on Syria's behalf. 5 Dec 56 Current Intelligence Bulletin Page 5 TOPSfJCRET Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 LOIVLUIEIVTIAL 4. SOVIET-RUMANIAN COMMUNIQUE The Soviet-Rumanian communiqu�s- sued in Moscow on 3 December pays lip service to Rumania's "national sovereignty," but places greater em- phasis on the need to strengthen the "unity" of the Sino-Soviet bloc. It states Soviet troops in Rumania will remain temporarily, in view of the aggres- sive tactics of Western imperialists, although mention was made of later consultations between Warsaw pact nations concerning the ultimate disposition of these forces. This communiqu�mounts to the first public declaration since the suppression of the Hungarian revolution of the policy the USSR hopes to apply generally to the European Satellites. It does not contradict the Soviet-Polish communiqu�f 18 November, but variations in emphasis and specific content reveal the totally differ- ent nature of Polish and Rumanian relations with the USSR. Poland, in addition to gaining promises for significant and long-term economic aid from the USSR-- including the cancellation of old debts, was given a voice in the control of Soviet troop movements within Poland and was able to avoid any public declaration of support for the Soviet intervention in Hungary. Rumania, on the other hand, received only a relatively minor commitment for much- needed economic aid, including postponement but not can- cellation of certain debt payments. It secured no agree- ment concerning Soviet military units within Rumania and specifically endorsed the Soviet line toward Hungary, in- cluding the Soviet contention that it was the USSR's inter- national "duty" to use force against the "fascist counter- revolutionaries!' (CONFIDENTIAL) 5 Dec 56 Current Intelligence Bulletin Page 6 CONFJ1iENTIAL Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 yr / Z/d7115ffte;,OP)3,' 0 1 , 4 , , , , 711/ 0 4 4 0 0 e e , 4. fe 7 r . / 4 e r d 0 I/ ir (../ 1/ f;; e V /1), .0 i r# '�� 0 1 0,,,,,dawe,fardeffdA TOP CRET 7,00/07:07.4 Approved for Release: 2019/10/23 C03003001 ni for -sSi9g/fZ3 C�57771;)'Wjf�