CIVILIAN COURT TRIAL FOR GENERAL CAMPS - 1986/04/16

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
06627155
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
April 3, 2019
Document Release Date: 
April 12, 2019
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 16, 1986
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIVILIAN COURT TRIAL FOR [15499980].pdf225.31 KB
Body: 
Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155 CONFIDENTIAL :PROS -04/16/86 4k.MB:,FV0RTIZ .1301_,: JJ CARRAGHER:FLD '.1);CM:4A,BUSHNELL, POL:RBHOWARD, EAO:MJBERGER, DAO:COL.NIELSEN jPOL,3 AMB DCM, ECON SCI USIS, DAO MILGE EAO, RF CHRON . A,MEMBASSY BUE.1105 AIRES �SECStATE WASIIDC INFO USCINCSO QUARRY HEIGHTS PN ,USCINCLANT NORFOLK VA AJSAFS6 HOWARD AFB PN//DOI/LAI// CINCSO AND CINCLANT ALSO FOR INTAFF E.O. 12356: DECL: OADR TAGS: MARR, PGOV, SHUM, AR SUBJ: CIVILIAN COURT TRIAL FOR GENERAL CAMPS *- 220 : M J B r� N I E SE COL CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT DATE: 09-14-2018 CONFIDENTIAL Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155 � Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155 1. (U) THE FEDERAL APPEALS COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL DISTRICT DECIDED EARLIER THIS MONTH TO TAKE THE CASES OF RETIRED GENERAL RAMON ALBERTO CAMPS AND FUGITIVE GENERAL (RE) CARLOS GUILLERMO SUAREZ MASON AWAY FROM THE SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE ARMED FORCES. USING THE SAME AUTHORITY INVOKED LAST YEAR IN THE CASES OF THE NINE JUNTA MEMBERS, THE APPEALS COURT DECIDED NOT TO GRANT ADDITIONAL TIME TO THE SUPREME COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE CASES. THE COURT'S DECISION ON THE CAMPS CASE NOTED THAT THE STATUTORY SIX MONTHS ORIGINALLY GRANTED THE COUNCIL HAD LONG SINCE ELAPSED. FEDERAL PROSECUTOR JULIO STRASSERA, WHO PROSECUTED THE JUNTA NINE, REPORTEDLY ARGUED THAT EVEN WITH ADDITIONAL TIME, "IT WOULD BE BARELY POSSIBLE TO IMAGINE ANY DECISION IN A RELATIVELY SHORT TIME." CONFIDENTIAL 2-k GE Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155 %,j cti'24A .c0f, !,7 OP � Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155 , 2. (C) COMMENT: SUAREZ MASON WILL MOST LIKELY REMAIN A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE, BUT THE WAY IS NOW OPEN FOR CAMPS TO BE TRIED IN THE SAME FASHION--WITH AT LEAST SOME ORAL TESTIMONY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC--AS THE MEMBERS OF THE JUNTAS WERE. CAMPS, WHO IS IN MILITARY DETEN- TION, WILL BE JUDGED FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES COMMITTED IN BUENOS AIRES WHILE HE WAS PROVINCIAL POLICE CHIEF. pp:r3a Ci�CNrDDENTIAL Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155 IUTA � nt-22ar.41-1�4cpaT C,C7 SILITC IZW1-2:11 (4,CAT 3 31T-4 Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155 - , 3. (C) THE CIVILIAN COURT'S ACTION WAS NOT UNEXPECTED AND BY ITSELF DOES NOT AFFECT THE GOA'S GOAL OF PUTTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIALS ISSUE BEHIND IT BY THE END OF 1986 OR EARLY 1987. MANY HERE ALWAYS ASSUMED THAT CIVILIAN TRIALS OF CAMPS AND A FEW OTHER NOTORIOUS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATORS WERE INEVITABLE, ACCEPTABLE TO THE GOA, TOLERATED BY THE MILITARY. IT IS UNCERTAIN, OF COURSE, WHAT PASSIONS TESTIMONY IN THE TRIAL MAY FAN, BUT THE ARGENTINE MILITARY ARE UNLIKELY TO REGARD CAMPS' FATE AS CRITICAL TO THEIR OWN. MUCH MORE WORRISOME TO THE ARMED FORCES WILL BE THE CASE OF NAVY LIEUTENANT ALFREDO ASTIZ, WHOSE DOSSIER IS APPARENTLY RE-OPENED IN THE SUPREME COUNCIL. SOME REPORTS SAY A SUPREME COUNCIL DECISION IS NEAR. TO MANY IN THE MILITARY, ASTIZ'S CASE CONTINUES TO BE THE LITMUS TEST OF GOA'S ATTITUDES TOWARD MID- OR LOWER-LEVEL OFFICERS WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE WAR ON SUBVERSION. ORTIZ## CONT I D;EUBFkLI.T'4,'1 Approved for Release: 2018/09/17 C06627155