EXPLOITATION OF TENSIONS IN THE SOVIET UNION AND EASTERN EUROPE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
18
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
February 19, 2010
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 9, 1970
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1.pdf670.16 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 MrILVLUic1INJJUAw THE WHITE HOUSE - WASHINQTON SECRET/SENSITIVE MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: Henry A. Kissinger SUBJECT: April 9, 1970 Exploitation of Tensions in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe Attached is an excellent CIA paper describing covert action programs being undertaken to exploit tensions in the' Soviet Union and Eastern Europe and identifying activities which may be emphasized in the future. In assessing Soviet vulnerabilities the report notes that: Although the internal dissident is not likely to signifi- cantly influence Soviet society in the short term, existing trends toward more active dissidence could be affected by external developments. The discrediting of the regime by a serious economic crisis or another Czech-type crisis might promote radical changes in the internal political climate. ON-FILE NSC RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS APPLY MORI/CDF C05106190 ??? Suppression of the growing intellectual dissent by Soviet authorities has disillusioned many foreign Communists and Soviet sympathizers. Among the non-Russian minorities in the Soviet Union dissent is vocal and widespread. -- There is also increasing criticism of the Soviet economy. In Eastern Europe where the tensions ate-greater and the Western orientation much stronger the Soviets will have to rely on force to maintain hegemony. There are numerous indications of the effectiveness of the program CIA conducts to capitalize on Soviet vulnerabilities: ??? Radio Free Europe, vhich broadcasts to an Eastern European audience of over 30 41lion that swells dramatically during crises, is frequently denounced by Communist leaders. Czech Party Secretary Husak, for example, has blamed RFE 'tor his party's inability to win over the Czech population. SECRET/SENSITIVE No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19 : LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 ? IP - .adie Liberty which broadcasts to thWSoviet Union has bad a significant role in increasing manifestations of dis- sent and opposition among the Soviet intelligensia. Defectors have often commented on the significant impact of the broad- cast of documents written by protesters. The $150 million spent anually by the Russians for jamming operations which are only marginally successful is indica- tive of the value of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty which cost less than :o operate. Publication of smuggled manuscripts and magazines geared to the Eastern European audience and distribution of books 25X1 not available in Communist countries have also made an impact. Emphasis on the following activities is being considered in planning for future operations: ? am 0.1 ? greater exploitation of dissent through modernized radio ? transmitting facilities, wider dissemination of criticism by the intellectuals, and stimulation of nationality aspirations ? among Soviet minorities; attacks on Soviet activities outside the bloc and intensified exploitation of anti-Communist themes abroad; 2 5 X 1 developing leaders capable of providing a democratic alterna- tive to Soviet-supported front organizations; ? preparations for covert programs to offset the threat of Communist election victories in the Free World. ff a Attachment 2 5 X 1 Al SECRET/SENSITIVE ?..a No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19 L 1,1? o (4-0:1 Ft,--c ,..,.y..:J. 7---u,,, ,4-...-/-,---- : OC-HAK-289-6-4-1 NILYmilVt, No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 11. 3M111.7. TENSIONS IN THE SOVIET UNION AND EASTERN. EUROPE CHALLENGE AND OPPORTUNITY Introduction ?At no time in the history of the Soviet Union to date have political forces outside the Communist Party leadership played a significant role in influencing events. The Party apparatus, the KGB and the deeply vested interests of the Soviet State hierarchy are experienced in coping with dissidence of all types, and have an impressive record of asserting their will at any cost to the rest of society. The KGB in particular has an almost perfect record of successful penetration, manipulation and suppression of opposition elements. In addition there is an historic tradition of public apathy, largely unchanged even today among the workers and peasants of Russia, and dissident elements find little encouragement at the grass roots. The authorities have often exploited the antipathy of the working class toward the intelligentsia in suppressing incipient demonstrations. Thus the experience of Russian history strongly argues against the proposition that the internal dissident will significantly influence Soviet society in the short term. The conditions, nevertheless, which abet existing trends toward more active and articulate dissidence could be affected by external developments. A discrediting of the regime by, say, another Czechoslovak crisis or a serious economic crisis, might well promote radical 'changes in the internal political climate. The paragraphs that follow should be considered in this light. Intellectual Dissent To describe the nature and scope of dissidence in the Soviet Union today poses the risk of over-emphasis. The Soviet regime is by no means on the brink of collapse. On the other hand, some- thing new has indeed emerged in Soviet society since Stalin's death. The growing demand for freedom of expression has been widely reported in the Western press, and its suppression by Soviet authori- ties has in turn contributed to disillusionment among foreign Communists and Soviet sympathizers. SECk: c7777777. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 ? NH:1* I No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 ) )410, gp 11. 25X1 ? Beyond the circle of leading-scientists and writers there are ..the.. active dissidents themselves. Most of them are younger members -of- '"-th'er-Intelligentsia, but their ranks also include workers, teachers, other professionals. 2 SECRET CF71 TIE No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 ; t'? r 1; 6. r e7.?_7-77:7171r No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 The picture of the Soviet Union that these defectors paint is one Of increasing cynicism and alienation on the part of the intelligentsia, -and:apathy and bitterness in the working class/ .25X1 3 OP, No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 ) N1.1. No Objection to Declassification in Hart 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 IIP LUI-(t. IIP Minority Repression Among many of the non-Russian minorities in the Soviet Union, dissent is vocal and widespread. It is also vigorously repressed. In the Ukraine, the arrests of hundreds of Ukrainian dissidents in ? 1965 and 1966, and subsequent repressions, have been vigorously Protested by leading Ukrainian scientists, artists, and writers, ? The contempt of the Baltic pepple for Soviet rule remains as strong as ever. It is no longer expressed in hopeless armed resis- tance, as it was twenty years ago. Instead, these small nations manifest a vigorous determination to preserve their national cultures. Even the local Communist Party apparatus has sought to assert a degree of autonomy. In Estonia many works of Western literature that have never been published in Russian are printed in the native language. Two of the major underground documents recently pro- posing alternatives to the Communist dictatorship originated in Estonia. Economic Unrest Since the December 1969 Central Committee Plenum, the Soviet press has given increasing attention to the lethargy of the economy. The best informed defectors and even Soviet economists depict the economy as suffering from overcentralization, rigid control, and a system of falsification and misrepresentation that prevents anyone from knowing what the true conditions are. / No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 ?25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 ? E,Urkt-.. I f?w Eastern Europe In addition to its domestic problems, the Soviet Union has had chronic difficulty in managing its satellites in Eastern Europe. In Eastern Europe the tensions in society are much greater than in the Soviet Union, the Western orientation much stronger, and the possi- ,.. 'May exists that at some futu.re time one Or more of these countries may successfully make the transition that Czechoslovakia essayed in It seems inevitable that, as long as-the Soviet Union maintain,s .',4-sCurrent system, it will be iMpossible for the peoples of Eastern Europe to live in real harmony with the Soviet Union and that, to maintain hegemony in the area, the Soviets will have to continue to rely upon force. ? Dissident elements in the USSR and Eastern Europe display remarkable sympathy and under sta fo th 125X1 25X1 ) (-" - ? Others protested the biased- reporting in the Soviet press an oviet threats before the troops moved in. Intellectuals in all Ea-stern European - countries have actively collaborated with the Soviet dissidents, and-- have expressed their sympathy for those arrested and imprisoned. With its easier access to the West, Eastern Europe acts as a conduit for books, letters, manuscripts and ideas. The flow back and forth across the Soviet borders is relatively easy and constant. The fact that Eastern European 'standards of tolerance and freedom _ aiireasiiin, although restrictive, are 'ikell?aboye-the leve-ls permitted 11 ? -in the Soviet Union makes the region's ability to influence the Soy-jot Union a consideration of major importance to the United States. 25X1 )177,S17-71,11V S0 E0 26/R9T: 0 No Objection to Declassification in part .1 2 .LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 / 1E No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 ?.; gip SECRET ' ? ) ? Radio Broadcasts Free Europe, Inc., and Radio Liberty Committee, Inc., were organized in 1749 and 1951 respectively by the CIA. The major activity of each operation is radio broadcasting. Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty programming centers are located in ? ? . - ? ? ? . The radio has achieved a high degree of - -Eastern European listener acceptance as a station which identifies .? -25X1 with their needs, thoughts and aspirations. It is estimated that over__ people listen to RFE broadcasts?_This percentage rises - =? dramatically during periods of international crisis, ?RFE is denounced almost daily by Communist media, and on occasion by-key figures of the Eastern European governments. Czechoslovak Party Secretary Husak has publicly placed a large share of the blame on RFE for his Party's inability to win over the Czechoslovak population. 25X1 25X1., 25X1 The station is a political force with which the Eastern. European ez,?t.'w1-4iregimes .must reckon. The res,scin for this lien partly in _tp#.t,t,e,x,:n of ,cross-reporting?i e , reporting in detail to all the Eastern European countries on domestic developments in thedi,' Countries. This is in effect the principal way the peoples ,of - the area learn of significant developments in their own and_ neighboring countries. It can be demonstrated that RFE's repeated exposure of T' domestic policies and methods has forced modification of censorship and, sitnilar restrictions in several of the Eastern EuropeancountiR n . RFE's role in the 1968 Czechoslovak crisis is a striking example. of of the radio's effectiveness. Prior to the ousting of Party First SiaCRET No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 ? OLUI11- gp Secretary Novotny in January 1968, RFE was the chief source of factual information and research analysis on domestic affairs for much of the Czechoslovak population. After the Soviet invasion and the loss of their new-found freedom, the Czechoslovak people again. became dependent on the round-the-clock reporting of RFE. Audience research indicates that?RFE's liste.nership rose to of the population. The station received of letters extolling its programs, while ;the. Communist news media unleashed an unprecedented series of attacks on RFE. The Soviht journal Red Star describecithe,.radio as the Pmost............. strategic weapon in the global psychological war being carried on by the United States against thee world socia41tatNayste.4,......,..,.,_,, Radio Liberty (RL) , 25i1? ..contrast to RFE, RL against the more restrictive Soviet system. Effectiveness is more difficult to measure. However,, letters from listeners,. defector- reports and Indicate that there is a sizeable auditenc It is generally agreed that RL merits a sjgnificant share ef the-4. - 25X1- --- -credit for the increasing manifestations of dissent and opposition ? among the Soviet intelligentsia.i .25X1 - Communist Attacks on the Radios Soviet and Eastern European attempts to discredit RFE and RL are intensive and coordinated., The Communist regimes a're particularly discomfited by the two. d coverage and highly effective cross-reporting of internal devel-.3- ortinz 0 oprnents, and by their exploitation of intel1ectu,a1 ferment, _ nationalist tendencies and general dissent within the Soviet Union. 7 c 0 )4 a4Lk. g SLel.?L I No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 Y2' or+ No Objection to Declassification in Hart 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 IIP ttl;KLI I ?P .25X1 '125X-1 ? , . 25X1- - A measure of the Soviet concern over Western broadcasts is the extent of the Soviet jamming effort. At-this time, Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria also extensively jam RFE broadcasts. According to a? VOA study, the Soviets use 2, 000 - 2, 500 jammers at an estimated annual cost of $150, 000, 000. As indicated above, however, the jamming is marginally eTiective inasmuch as the target audiences hear the radios on one or more frequencies. The cost of the Soviet jamming effort can be put into perspective by comparing it with the annual operating costs of FE, Inc., and RLC, Inc. and- :espectively. The radios represent a 20-year krivest-- rnent of over ?'-g, 11 SECRET No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 fi No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 OLUrit 1 IP 25X1 Coordination and Interrelation of Programs Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty and the other organizations and programs mentioned above reinforce ea-ch other's aetivities in many ways, significantly enhancing the effectiveness of the ov_ezall _ P.?., ---,.,effortz--in. the ecology of dissidence in the Soviet Union and Eaator,n Europe, political organizations such as the NTS and Prolog make contact through Western European travelers with the dissenters inside.- ? Through these tontacts and other means documents of protest, -- suppressed novels and similar material are brought out to the--West. - They are published in the original language and then broadcast by Radio Liberty and Radio Free Europe back to the East, thus vastly_-- magnifying the audience for the original protest documents and in n?ifirnulating further dissidence; Through the far-flung -contacts.,' of the radios and other CIA instrumentalities the publications are distributed to travelers from the Soviet Union and-Eastern Europe 4-82et1i and cheaply. Czech a.nd-Polish distributors enlist their cam.. - n 11(1 `tratkiots to carry :back Russian volumes to Poland and Czechoslovakialo for shipment onward. Few East Europeans need to be told that the future of their own countries depends in large_measure upon develop-- merits in Moscow. it this system of interlocking organizations and people, a. vital role-i's 'also played by overt government media such as the Voice, of - r America and ? Their role is media, and in tandem to reinforce their of course different from that of the covertly sporis,ored recent years the two have worked harmoniously in respective efforts. ir S 1: CP ET No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19 : LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 . QEPF)1:1- No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 1,4 Planning for the Future give..p_the necessary Rolicy,approvals.,p4d_laudget,ary,resources,, we propose a number of additional courses of.covertaction, aimed not only at the USSR itself, but also at Soviet presence and influence outside the Bloc. Most of these can be undertaken with existing some instances it will be necessary to create new ones. Exploitation of Internal Dissent se mode zation Ra,dio ,Fr ee Europe and ,Ra di o Liberty Spectrum interference (including jamming) and channel con-.:- lestion in the short and medium wave broadcasting modes have reached such serious proportions that higher power transmitters are needed to....... maintain an audible signal in the target area. The transmitting plants of both Radio Liberty and Radio Free Europe are outmoded and under, powered. Both require augmentation and modernization to sustain their effectiveness in a field of friendly and hostile "super power"- -..-nravlitt.con-ipetitors. In addition, Radio Liberty needs new facilities - -reach 'geographic areas of the USSR now only marginally covered. A . -ininimurn program of modernization, established by careful Agency review in coopetation with the Roreau of the Budget, calls for an out- lay ol This item was struck from CIA's FY 1971- budget; it will be included in the FY 1972 budget. ' No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/02/19: LOC-HAK-289-6-4-1 25X1