SYRIA-THE NEXT STEP?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
June 16, 2010
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 3, 1975
Content Type: 
SNIE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1.pdf490.29 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 SPECIAL NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTI MATE Syria-The Next Step? Secret SNIE 36.7-1-75 3 November 1975 Copy N2 6 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to Criminal Sanctions DISSEMINATION CONTROL ABBREVIATIONS NOFORN- Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals NOCONTRAO- Not Releasable to Contractors or Contractor/ Consultants PROPIN- Caution-Proprietary Information Involved USIBONLY- USIB Departments Onlyh ORCON- Dissemination and Extraction of Information Controlled by Originator REL... - This Information has been Authorized for Release to... No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 S N I E 36.7-1-75 SYRIA-THE NEXT STEP? No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 THIS ESTIM INTELLIGENCE TE IS ISSUED BY HE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL THE UNITED AS NOTED IN The following int the Estimate: The Central Intl of State a STATES INTELLIGEN THE TEXT, AS FOLL Iligence organizations Iligence Agency, the intelli E BOARD CONCURS, EXCEF T WS: articipated in the preparation ~f ence organizations of the Departments d Defense, and the National Security Agency. Concurring: The Deputy Dir Agency actor of Central Intelligent The Director of Intelligence and Research The Director, D fense Intelligence Agency The Director, N tional Security Agency The Acting Dep ty Assistant Administrator and Devel pment Administration representing the Central Intelligence representing the Department of Stu 'de National Security, Energy Resear h Abstaining: The Assistant D rector, Federal Bureau of I The Special Assi tant to the Secretary of the of the Tre Bury vestigation Treasury representing the Departme t Also Participating The Assistant C lief of Staff for Intelligence Department of the Army The Director of Naval Intelligence, Depart ent of the Navy The Assistant Chi f of Staff, Intelligence, Dep rtment of the Air Force No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 SYRIA-THE NEXT STEP? PRECIS Despite Syria's increasingly intransigent public position on future peace negotiations, we believe President Asad is still interested in talks concerning a second-stage Israeli withdrawal on the Golan Heights. The Syrians, however, are likely to continue to insist as a pre- condition that the PLO be recognized in some way as a party to the negotiations before they will engage in such talks. Meanwhile, Damascus will exert maximum pressure on the US and Israel, hoping thereby to underscore an urgent need for diplomatic movement and to force concessions to Syria's negotiating demands. Between now and November 30, Asad's strategy will be to increase military tensions in order to create concern about Syria's military in- tentions and whether it will agree to the renewal of UNDOF. If neces- sary, however, Asad will go beyond mere posturing and this will lend further credibility to his "war of nerves." The Syrians have few, if any, good diplomatic moves to play. They do, however, have a range of military options that include: -- additional troop movements, exercises, alerts, overflights, re- serve call-up; - military "incidents," including firing across the UN buffer zone at Israeli patrols, short incursions into the Israeli disengage- ment area, and the facilitation of fedayeen terrorist and sabo- tage operations on the Golan Heights; I SECRET No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 -some fo m of "war of attritio - major m litary operations with specific - resumpt We do not He may, howe pressure camp Under these cir objectives; on of major hostilitie elieve Asad will deli er, take military acti ign fails to produce umstances we believe - Syria vember ably oc - If this there i even f contin Israeli mosph - At thi canno retali - The s in Sy The Israeli initiatives co military imp that would erately resort to full-scale w r. ns short of war if his curre t acceptable diplomatic resul s. hat: ill continue to step a its pressure campaign as 30 draws nearer. So roe serious "incidents" will pr ur during this period a good chance that rther by letting the U ing to abide by the isengagement agree re without provokin point, however, lim be ruled out and the ion and a general es uation in Lebanon co an and Israeli forces. uld rapidly spread to not produce diplomatic results, Asad will increase the press re mandate run out, perhaps w ile ilitary limitations of the Syr'a v- ent. This would create a crisis at- an Israeli attack. ed military operations by Syria e would run a high risk of Is aeli alation of the fighting. Id deteriorate in a way that ew Fighting between them in L ba- the Golan Heights as well. , for their part, are reluctant to take any new diplo atic cerning the Golan H ights both because of the a ea's rtance and the very d fficult domestic political prob ems raised. They will be even less interested in doing o in increased tension induced by Syria. 2 S CRET No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 DISCUSSION THE IMPACT OF SINAI II 1. The recent Egypt-Israel agreement on Sinai has left Syria's leaders frustrated. They feel Presi- dent Sadat misled them and seriously undercut their own negotiating chances by making far-reaching po- litical concessions and by not insisting that the im- plementation of the Sinai agreement be linked to negotiations for further Israeli withdrawal on the Golan Heights. 2. The Syrians insist they will not pay the po- litical price Sadat did simply to regain another small slice of the Golan and that they will not abandon the Palestinians. Consequently, they profess to see little hope of obtaining anything at present from the Israelis through negotiations. This pessimism stems not only from their belief that Egypt has left them in the lurch but also from their concern that the US has expended what leverage it had over Israel to obtain the Sinai agreement. They do not take Israel's offer to negotiate seriously and believe the Rabin government would try to drag such talks out indefinitely. 3. Out of frustration and anger, therefore, Da- mascus has lashed out with increasing vehemence at the Sinai accord and Sadat. Initially, this criti- cism was somewhat restrained and was designed primarily to protect President Asad's flank from attack by the Iraqis and his internal opponents while he reevaluated the prospects for negotiations with Israel. But since about mid-September, there has been a progressive hardening of Syrian public opposition to the Sinai accord that apparently re- flects a growing conviction among Syrian leaders that their chances of obtaining anything satisfactory soon via negotiations are poor. 4. The current strident propaganda assault on the accord shows no signs of abating. Numerous rallies and protest demonstrations have been staged in Damascus and other Syrian cities over the past several weeks. In addition, Syrian leaders have kept up a steady stream of attacks on the accord, echo- ing with increasing frequency Foreign Minister Khaddam's demand that Sadat renounce the agree- ment. 5. President Asad has also adopted a tough, un- compromising public stance on future Syrian-Israeli negotiations. He stated flatly in a recent televised speech commemorating the 1973 war that Syria would not engage in negotiations for a further sepa- ration of forces accord unless the Palestine Libera- tion Organization is involved in the negotiating process. By not specifying who would have to talk to the PLO-the US or Israel-Asad may have intended to leave open the possibility of some form of new Golan arrangement without the PLO but with no political strings attached. Nevertheless, he appears to have consciously reduced his room for maneuver in order to indicate that he is not pre- pared to make any political concessions for an in- terim step toward peace. 3 SECRET No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 LITTLE LEVERAGE 6. Given Syrian pessimism, lieves he has nothing to lose public posture for the time Syrians have few, if any, gooq they know it. 7. Damascus, for example little help from Moscow in aq breakthrough. Although the viets as arms suppliers, they especially helpful in promot the negotiating table. Moreo that the Soviets have very lit Israelis and believe they are Soviet-American relations by on Washington. 8. The Syrians seem to rea dependent than ever on the sions from the Israelis. Yet US intentions and are skel ability to exert pressure on in earnest. Asad, for instance, the US wants to "anesthctizi area until after next year's 1 Asad probably be- by assuming a rigid being. Indeed, the I moves to play and apparently expects hieving a diplomatic yrians value the So- ave not found them ng their interests at Ter, the Syrians know de influence with the nwilling to jeopardize ratting direct pressure ize that they are more US to extract conces- :hey are suspicious of tical of Washington's Tel Aviv to negotiate has said that he thinks the situation in the residential election. 9. Nor have the Syrians b response of other Arab lead ment. Many of the more in maincd silent, probably hop that has erupted between will somehow go away. Mos who have criticized the Sinai agreement in private, have so far gone along wi have even tried to encourag relations with Cairo. Thus, en encouraged by the rs to the Sinai agree- uential ones have re- ing that the quarrel important, the Saudis, h Sadat publicly and Asad to patch up his ie Syrians probably do not harbor high hopes of p,rsuading the Saudis to use their oil as a diplomatic weapon any time soon on behalf of Syria and the Palestinians. MILITARY OPTIONS 10. The most important presently holds is his pow extension of the mandate of on the Golan Heights, w newal again on November threatened not to approv mandate and only reverse moment, hoping to obtain diplomatic card Asad r not to agree to the ich comes up for re- 0. Last year the Syrians an extension of the themselves at the last ome quid pro quo. This follow through on such threat. His obvious aim would ons in a dramatic way in order to rgent need for diplomatic mov ances of an armed clash betw nd Israelis. Although the Syrians at the Israelis might use the r andate as an excuse to attack, A he implementation of the Sinai ac 11. Asad could go even further eginning another round of artill united ground skirmishes as he o spur negotiations or by trying ortion of Israeli-held territory. xert military leverage at all, we pt for something limited in scot ope could be contained. The o to such a tactic is that it would i punitive retaliation. The Syrians' r_ with the current Lebanon crisis in fear of provoking Israeli militar} 12. In addition, of course, Asad of starting major hostilities on the objective in that case, as he rece off-the-record remarks, would b pitted the two superpowers, the Union, against each other and to employ their oil weapon in the US to put more pressure on up Arab lands. 13. We doubt, however, that full-scale offensive as an acce certainly recognizes that such without the initial help this tim armed forces-could bear a heav risk the certain destruction of forces, serious economic disloca cupation of more Syrian territo leaving Syria in an even weake tion. Neither the Soviets nor support Damascus needs, appe derwrite such risk-taking at p Syria count on much military h the crucial first few days, fro Jordan, which would try to stay if Syria started it. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16 : LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 underscore the increase the en the Syrians feared last year vocation of the ad might calcu- id jeopardizing ord with Egypt, t some point by ry barrages and id in early 1974 to seize a small f he decides to elieve he would that he would vious drawback isk strong Israeli straint in dealing part reflects their reprisals. etains the option Syrian front. His -tly said in some the same as it S and the Sovie order to compe the Israelis to giv table option. H a gamble-take of the Egyptia penalty. It woul ions, and the o y by the Israeli negotiating pos he Saudis, whos r prepared to u lp, at least duria Egypt or eveji out of the fightir No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 STANDING PAT 14. Because negotiations appear to offer so little hope of success at present and military action is risky, Asad could choose to stick to his present hard- line posturing and bide his time. This would offer him an acceptable way out of his present dilemma and could hold a certain attraction for the Syrian leadership. While sustaining a controlled state of tension on the Golan Heights, they could turn their attention to consolidating their position at home and staking out a stronger claim to Arab leadership, which they believe Sadat has forfeited. They would especially seek closer political and military ties with the PLO and Jordan and even try to resurrect military cooperation with Iraq to strengthen their bargaining position in any future negotiations. 15. The Syrians are deeply concerned about Leba- non and have monopolized the mediation role between the warring factions. Syria is not inclined to intervene militarily but would probably feel constrained to at least keep such a decision under consideration and might threaten to restore order in Lebanon if things get much worse. At a minimum, Asad would not feel comfortable about pursuing a policy of brinksmanship on the Golan while civil war raged next door. In a worst-case situation, such fighting could compel Syrian intervention with its attendant high risk of confrontation with Israel. Fighting between Syrian and Israeli forces in Lebanon could rapidly spread to the Golan Heights as well. 16. From all appearances, Asad can afford to wait awhile if he chooses to do so. He does not appear, from what few sources of information we have available, to be under the kinds of pressure Sadat was this summer to resort to military action if he cannot obtain something soon through ne- gotiations. With the Egyptian front "frozen," we believe Asad could probably resist any internal pressures on him to fight by arguing that Syria needs more time to strengthen its armed forces and its position generally in the Arab world. drawal on the Golan presents Tel Aviv with even greater problems than the recently concluded Sinai agreement. Strategically, the Golan is important to Israel because of its proximity to . Israeli popula- tion centers. This, plus the fact the area under Israeli occupation is only about 12 miles across at its widest, has led Tel Aviv to take the position that it has almost no room to make territorial conces- sions as part of an interim agreement without en- dangering the security of Israel proper. 18. The 22 Jewish settlements in being or under construction on the Golan are another major com- plicating factor. The opposition of Jewish settlers in the occupied territories to any diminution of the Israeli presense there gives the government a power- ful domestic political incentive to put off serious negotiations. The settlement issue cuts across party lines and the Golan settlers, although only about 2,000 in number, have considerable political clout. Every party in Rabin's ruling coalition sponsors at least one Golan settlement. Many of the settle- ments, furthermore, were built to strengthen Is- rael's claim to the area. Several lie almost athwart the present disengagement line, further diminishing the government's room to maneuver. 19. Nonetheless, Tel Aviv recognizes that there are some benefits to be gained-principally in sta- bilizing the Sinai agreement-in early negotiations with Syria. The Israelis, moreover, are interested in keeping the northern front quiescent and favor an extension of the UN forces' mandate on the Golan when it expires on November 30. In early October, Defense Minister Peres said that Israel would prob- ably make a minor unilateral gesture on the Golan to encourage Syria to renew the mandate. It is possi- ble that the Israelis might still attempt such a ges- ture if the Syrians do not resort to any hostile mili- tary action. They are reluctant, however, to take the initiative on negotiations, especially in a situa- tion of increasing tension. Rabin will look to Wash- ington to get the ball moving. THE ISRAELI ATTITUDE 17. Although the Israelis have offered to negotiate with Syria, Tel Aviv is reluctant to begin early ne- gotiations for anything less than a final peace ac- cord. Negotiating for even a limited Israeli with- 20, In the short term, Asad can be expected to step up his "war of nerves" This could include some limited military action, such as artillery fire and low-level incidents. The Syrians will over the next 5 SECRET No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 month in particular raise th diplomatic and mili- tary temperature in the area s the time approaches to renew the UN mandate in rder to improve their bargaining position. 21. In fact, Asad has alrea y begun this process. His remarks to Newsweek i September about the possibility of Syria resuming hostilities on its own, the recent shift of Syrian arm red and infantry units back to the Golan front, an his recent comments to a Kuwait newspaper that he UN observer forces do not constitute an obstacl to military operations are all calculated to create u certainty about Syria's military intentions. There ve also been reports of reserve call-ups. 22. One unsubtantiated Syrians may be planning a port claims tion of short duration to sa territory held by the Israeli disengagement line. Such would be designed to force to contain the fighting and t imited military opera- off a small chunk of somewhere along the move, if undertaken, e US to move quickly refocus its diplomatic efforts on obtaining a Syrian-Israeli accord, pre- umably one that also contained s palestinians. The possibility of a li grab operation cannot be ruled out, of such action may have been pla Syrian effort to keep the pressur Israel to make some concession to the UN mandate runs out. mething for the ited Syrian land- although rumors ted as part of a on the US and amascus before 23. If the "war of nerves" does not produce re- sults, there is a good chance that Asad will up the pressure even further by simply let date run out while continuing to tary limitations of the Syria-Isra agreement. If however, he deci harder by engaging in limited mil the mandate lapses, he risks p Israeli response. resort to full-scale war. He kno not have the military capability t Heights and that any Syrian offe ably result in a smashing Israel Syria in an even worse bargaini SEIRET ing the UN man- bide by the mili- I disengagement es to push even tary actions after ovoking a major will deliberate! s that Syria doe regain the Gola isive would prob victory and pu g position. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16 : LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 1. This document was disseminated by the Central Intelligence Agency. This copy is for the information and use of the recipient and of persons under his jurisdiction on a need-to-know basis. Additional essential dissemination may be authorized by the follow- ing officials within their respective departments: a. Director of Intelligence and Research, for the Department of State b. Director, Defense Intelligence Agency, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the organization of the Joint Chiefs of Staff c. Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army, for the Department of the Army d. Director of Naval Intelligence, for the Department of the Navy e. Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, USAF, for the Department of the Air Force f. Deputy Assistant Administrator for National Security, Energy Research and Development Administration g. Assistant Director, FBI, for the Federal Bureau of Investigation h. Director of NSA, for the National Security Agency i. Special Assistant to the Secretary for National Security for the Department of the Treasury j. The DCI's Deputy for National Intelligence Officers, for any other Depart- ment or Agency 2. This document may be retained, or destroyed by burning in accordance with applicable security regulations, or returned to the Central Intelligence Agency by arrangement with the DCI's Deputy for National Intelligence Officers. 3. When this document is disseminated overseas, the overseas recipients may retain it for a period not in excess of one year. At the end of this period, the document should either be destroyed, returned to the forwarding agency, or per- mission should be requested of the forwarding agency to retain it in accordance with IAC-D-69/2, 22 June 1953. 4. The title of this document when used separately from the text should be clas- sified: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1 Secret Secret No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/06/16: LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1