LAOS OPERATIONS: MEETING WITH SENATOR STENNIS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6
Release Decision: 
RIFLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
October 20, 2011
Sequence Number: 
27
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 3, 1971
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6.pdf211.43 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6 MEMORANDUM SECRET NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL URGENT ACTION December 3, 1971 MEMORANDUM FOR: DR. KISSINGER FROM: 'RICHARD T. KENNEDY/rit SUBJECT: 3J-36 Laos Operations: Meeting with. Senator Stennis You earlier agreed to meet with Senator Stermis to discuss his concerns over funding of Laos operations. On September 2 Senator Stennis wrote the President saying that he could not support any further funding with respect to Laos as part of the CIA budget (Tab B). He urged that other funding alternatives be considered in the FY 1973 budget. The Senator also alluded to the "final consideration" that the primary purpose of the Agency is jeopardized due to its involvement in the Laos operation. You have seen Director Helms to be sure of his support, but wished to delay meeting with Senator Stennis. We have held off recommending a meeting while the Foreign Aid debate was underway. Senator Stennis' involvement in the debate is now at a comparatively low ebb and his concerns, particularly as they related to the Defense budget, are now behind him. The Senate will be adjourning shortly and the budget is now in process of final preparation. The Laos operations are being put into the Defense budget. Accordingly we recommend that during the week of December 6. are prepared to transfer funding budget, and to convey to him the CIA management of operations. you plan to meet with Senator Stennis You will want to inform him that we of the Laos operation to the Defense importance of continuing the current May Contain Congressional Material There is an interagency agreement that: ? Defense will take over all funding of CIA paramilitary operations in Laos beginning with FY 1973. -- CIA will continue to manage the operations. Talking points are at Tab A. John Lehman & John Negroponte concur. No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6 NSS, OSD Reviews Completed No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6 SECRET TALKING POINTS HAK Meeting with Senator Stennis -- You and the President appreciate his staunch support and value his advice. -- We.lave studied his letter of September Z carefully and have considered all reasonable alternatives. We have arranged that DOD will take over all funding of paramilitary operations in Laos beginning with FY 1973. -- You trust this meets his immediate concern and you seek his support in getting necessary authorizations and appropriations for Defense. -- It will be important in the hearings that CIA be protected. We have also been carefully considering the other point raised in the Senator's letter, management of paramilitary operations in Laos. This presents difficult problems: At this critical juncture when we are windin down our efforts in Southeast Asia and withdrawing our men, any major change in managing Laotian operations would be unavoidably and undesirably disruptive. N.) -- At the time when our troops are coming home and we are also trying to engineer a major change of policy toward Peking, our actions are especially subject to misinterpretation. -- It has been a long struggle in Laos -- we have helped the Laotians do enough to make a successful take-over effort too costly for the North Vietnamese. We do not want to give up now at the very time when those in Southeast Asia are assuming a larger share of the --burden and there is hope that a long-term solution can emerge. We have an on-going program with close working relationships of several years standing. This is an SECRET No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6 No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6 SECRET 2 - ??? SECRET important asset but one which is vulnerable to instant dissipation if we try to make major changes in the way we manage the operations. The operations have been conducted in Laos effectively with a minimum of direct U.S. involvement. We have kept U.S. military personnel out. The Geneva accords limit the kind of help and advice we can give and the way we provide it. We can't give assistance directly with a military program. Thg present arrangement gives us the most flexibility. If we did move the management from CIA to another agency, domestic opinion could interpret such a change as merely regularizing the operation, digging in our heels for a prolonged fight, and as an attempt to mislead public opinion. A serious charge of lack of credibility might be made. Also, the enemy would undoubtedly try to take advantage -- both militarily and psychologically -- of the unavoidable disruption such a change would produCe"-;.. Therefore, we believe it is essential to retain the present management arrangements in order to preserve the effectiveness of our operations. No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6 . Of6 ,?????? eq1710.10.q.MM .n1.117 r .0141,L..F.C.1 ,..1.4. No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6 ef:j el ? l , .r? : , 4: ? Ct "" """ ! ?? ""v? a "4 "'IV'. ? ? v? 44?0 0. ? der ? ? ^Z." f. 14.1kGC.CAtio .CIAVA?4117,4AVV?eLls JO. CHIC, coun?Li. Atoz grog/ pm cum The President The White House Xashington, D. C. 11~ Vs commrritc o...ros=o stir/ices Wt.r.:1-iINGTON. D.C. 20'.; 0 September 2, 1971. ? ? ? ? ? c..mmtil., logih lasst/ LiMplulisd .J.1.11on 'en 11142 !Miry rife,e.uromonl Authorialion Hill which Includes a portion of the authorization for funding United States operations in Laos. 14oreover, as you know, for a number of years the Central Intelligence Agency also has funded a portion of U. S. programs-in Laos. I strongly defended the budget requests,for.Laos for fiscal year 1972 and the full requ6st was approved by the Committee. I have con-1 eluded, however, that for the CIA to continue funding any portion of .the Laos operation after fiscal year 1972 would be a serious mistake 'and possibly jeopardize the success with which the CIA carries out 14s other world-wide functions. The CIA involvement in Laos is now a matter of public knowledge. Moreover, as you know, the U. S. programs in Laos have become an issue Iwithin the Senate which will doubtless be raised by floor amendments. These considerations haVe led to demands that all-the CIA budget be 'revealed and debated. The Laos matter therefore adds to the difficulty in protecting the CIA budget against demands for greater disclosure. Thoro is th inc I considoration of iho fact that tho primar/ purpot.43 t,1 Iho Aqtsuf:y It, .1nd rIv?iiiialo .1hd I .11c; Laos program servos to jeopardizo this primary function due to the criticism of its involvement in the Laos operation. I am writing now to advise you that 1 cannof support any further funding with respect to Laos as a .part of the CIA budget for fiscal year 1973. I urge that other.funding Oternatives be considered in connection with the formation of the frscal year 1973 CIA budget. ? This letter is written to you directly because of the serious nature of this matter-end the interagency relationships involved. ri.46:11 rw.poctfujly yourn, ? r k ? yi] , , John C. Stennis .Chairman ... Senate Armed Services Committee No Objection to Declassification in Full 2013/08/14: LOC-HAK-18-6-27-6