BOMBING TARGETS IN THE DRV

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-450-8-8-5
Release Decision: 
RIFLIM
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
December 23, 2009
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 11, 1972
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-450-8-8-5.pdf48.42 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2009/12/23: LOC-HAK-450-8-8-5 TOP SECRET/EYES ONLY MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: MR. K9SZNGER 49 V u J. w71.iJJ_'.~ ,L X1.L'a Z! Y w`7 1 L? iVi January 11, 1972 Bombing Targets in the DRV I was struck by our weekly briefing on Vietnam yesterday by the number of trucks in the DRV just sitting in mass parking lots between Hanoi and the Chinese border. A couple of these truck parks, located near Thai Nguyen I believe, have as many as 1, 000 new vehicles. The way they are exposed suggests that the DRV may consider itself immune to attacks against such targets north of the 20th parallel. I am sure this entire subject has been considered previously in consulta- tions to which I am not privy. I would, however, like to urge that if we have another series of protective reaction strikes that some of these truck parks be considered as targets. -- If we could knock out 1 or 2 thousand trucks with 1 or 2 day air campaign, it would in effect be equal to roughly our entire truck kill in the logistics system for a month of the dry season creating replacement problems just at a time when they are most needed. -- The psychological impact on DRV planning would be substantial with revived fears that no part of the DRV is immune to attacks on military targets which pose a direct threat to the South. Moreover, such attacks would exploit the lop-sided nature of their air defenses which are now oriented to the South and might even give them pause about such orientation. -- At this stage a 1 or 2 day strike, even though directed at what is possibly a far more lucrative target, might generate considerably less publicity here than the last one did. TOP SECRET/EYES ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Full 2009/12/23: LOC-HAK-450-8-8-5